tradingkey.logo

Elon Musk’s Tesla ordered to pay $243M in the Autopilot crash verdict

Cryptopolitan2025年8月1日 22:48

Tesla has been ordered to pay $243M after being found 33% liable for a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida. The Jury holds Tesla partially liable for the 2019 Florida collision that killed one and injured another.

Tesla Inc. was hit with a $243M judgment on Friday after a federal jury in Miami found the automaker partially responsible for a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system.

Tesla ordered to pay $243M in the Autopilot crash verdict

Following a three-week trial, jurors deliberated for less than a day before finding Tesla 33% liable for the collision. The driver was found 67% liable. The panel awarded $42.5M in compensatory damages and $200M in punitive damages against the company.

The crash occurred in the Florida Keys when a Tesla Model S, with George McGee behind the wheel, failed to stop at a T intersection and collided with a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. The collision was fatal for Naibel Benavides Leon, while her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, sustained serious injuries.

“This verdict represents justice for Naibel’s tragic death and Dillon’s lifelong injuries,” Brett Schreiber, the lead attorney for the victims, said in a statement. “It holds Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company’s trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.”

Tesla responded sharply, announcing plans to appeal the verdict. “Today’s verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety,” the company said in a statement. “We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”

The trial found Tesla liable

The trial brought in Tesla engineers, external analysts, and the driver of the Model S, George McGee as witnesses. McGee claimed that he had activated Autopilot while driving home from work and was distracted at the time of the crash. He said he had dropped his phone while on hold with American Airlines and was looking for it when the vehicle left the road.

“I knew I was completely responsible for operating the car,” McGee told the jury. “But I expected Autopilot to assist me in the event I made a mistake. In that case, I do feel like it failed me.”

Tesla’s legal team countered that the accident was entirely McGee’s fault, calling the court’s attention to the driver’s distraction and history of speeding. They pointed out that Autopilot requires the driver’s attention and readiness to take control at all times, even referring to the language in the owner’s manual and warnings displayed in the vehicle.

Data extracted from the Tesla showed that McGee had overridden the car’s adaptive cruise control by pressing the accelerator to 17 miles per hour over the speed limit moments before the crash. Tesla maintained that Autopilot functioned as designed and no known defect contributed to the collision.

The $243M verdict delivers a blow to Tesla’s courtroom track record, which previously included two favorable verdicts in California and multiple confidential settlements.

Cryptopolitan Academy: Want to grow your money in 2025? Learn how to do it with DeFi in our upcoming webclass. Save Your Spot

免責聲明:本網站提供的資訊僅供教育和參考之用,不應視為財務或投資建議。

相關文章

tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
日內數據由路孚特(Refinitiv)提供,並受使用條款約束。歷史及當前收盤數據均由路孚特提供。所有報價均以當地交易所時間為準。美股報價的即時最後成交數據僅反映透過納斯達克報告的交易。日內數據延遲至少15分鐘或遵循交易所要求。
* 參考、分析和交易策略由提供商Trading Central提供,觀點基於分析師的獨立評估和判斷,未考慮投資者的投資目標和財務狀況。
風險提示:我們的網站和行動應用程式僅提供關於某些投資產品的一般資訊。Finsights 不提供財務建議或對任何投資產品的推薦,且提供此類資訊不應被解釋為 Finsights 提供財務建議或推薦。
投資產品存在重大投資風險,包括可能損失投資的本金,且可能並不適合所有人。投資產品的過去表現並不代表其未來表現。
Finsights 可能允許第三方廣告商或關聯公司在我們的網站或行動應用程式的任何部分放置或投放廣告,並可能根據您與廣告的互動情況獲得報酬。
© 版權所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版權所有
KeyAI