tradingkey.logo

MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case

Cryptopolitan2025年8月26日 10:21

The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence.

According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case. 

The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court.

Search history is not evidence, defense attest

According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation.

Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty. 

“For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.”

Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.” 

“The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent. 

MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says

According to a US Department of Justice statement on the case, the brothers are accused of exploiting Ethereum’s Maximal Extractible Value (MEV) boost system in April 2023. They allegedly intercepted private transactions and manipulated them to siphon $25 million in just 12 seconds.

“And once they put their plan into action, their heist only took 12 seconds to complete,” US Attorney Damian Williams mentioned in his press briefing.

Authorities say the brothers targeted Ethereum traders by altering pending transactions, allowing them to divert the crypto funds before the trades were finalized. Court filings further reveal that the pair retained legal counsel immediately after being contacted by anonymous “sandwich attackers” who demanded the return of the stolen funds.

Anton was detained in Boston, while James was booked in New York during their arrest in May last year. In the afternoon of their indictment, the former appeared before US Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson in Massachusetts. James faced US Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo in the Southern District of New York.

“As alleged in today’s indictment, the Peraire-Bueno brothers stole $25 million in Ethereum cryptocurrency through a technologically sophisticated, cutting-edge scheme they plotted for months and executed in seconds,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told reporters at the time of their indictment.

Defense files other motions to scrap evidence

The Peraire-Bueno brothers also moved to exclude several other pieces of evidence. They asked the court to block prosecutors from introducing news articles that contain “inflammatory descriptions” of them as inadmissible hearsay.

MIT-educated brothers battle use of Google searches in $25 million crypto fraud case.
Motion to exclude Twitter screenshot as evidence. Source: CourtListener.

Moreover, they sought to prevent the government from using a screenshot from X that allegedly shows a “false signature.” The screenshot was originally posted by pseudonymous Paradigm crypto researcher “Samczsun.” Defense attorneys are trying to convince the court that prosecutors cannot properly authenticate the image, and that they should admit it would be prejudicial.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

免责声明:本网站提供的信息仅供教育和参考之用,不应视为财务或投资建议。

相关文章

tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
日内数据由路孚特(Refinitiv)提供,并受使用条款约束。历史及当前收盘数据均由路孚特提供。所有报价均以当地交易所时间为准。美股报价的实时最后成交数据仅反映通过纳斯达克报告的交易。日内数据延迟至少15分钟或遵循交易所要求。
* 参考、分析和交易策略由第三方提供商Trading Central提供,观点基于分析师的独立评估和判断,未考虑投资者的投资目标和财务状况。
风险提示:我们的网站和移动应用程序仅提供关于某些投资产品的一般信息。Finsights 不提供财务建议或对任何投资产品的推荐,且提供此类信息不应被解释为 Finsights 提供财务建议或推荐。
投资产品存在重大投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金,且可能并不适合所有人。投资产品的过去表现并不代表其未来表现。
Finsights 可能允许第三方广告商或关联公司在我们的网站或移动应用程序的任何部分放置或投放广告,并可能根据您与广告的互动情况获得报酬。
© 版权所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版权所有
KeyAI