tradingkey.logo

Elon Musk’s Tesla ordered to pay $243M in the Autopilot crash verdict

Cryptopolitan2025年8月1日 22:48

Tesla has been ordered to pay $243M after being found 33% liable for a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida. The Jury holds Tesla partially liable for the 2019 Florida collision that killed one and injured another.

Tesla Inc. was hit with a $243M judgment on Friday after a federal jury in Miami found the automaker partially responsible for a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system.

Tesla ordered to pay $243M in the Autopilot crash verdict

Following a three-week trial, jurors deliberated for less than a day before finding Tesla 33% liable for the collision. The driver was found 67% liable. The panel awarded $42.5M in compensatory damages and $200M in punitive damages against the company.

The crash occurred in the Florida Keys when a Tesla Model S, with George McGee behind the wheel, failed to stop at a T intersection and collided with a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. The collision was fatal for Naibel Benavides Leon, while her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, sustained serious injuries.

“This verdict represents justice for Naibel’s tragic death and Dillon’s lifelong injuries,” Brett Schreiber, the lead attorney for the victims, said in a statement. “It holds Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company’s trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.”

Tesla responded sharply, announcing plans to appeal the verdict. “Today’s verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety,” the company said in a statement. “We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.”

The trial found Tesla liable

The trial brought in Tesla engineers, external analysts, and the driver of the Model S, George McGee as witnesses. McGee claimed that he had activated Autopilot while driving home from work and was distracted at the time of the crash. He said he had dropped his phone while on hold with American Airlines and was looking for it when the vehicle left the road.

“I knew I was completely responsible for operating the car,” McGee told the jury. “But I expected Autopilot to assist me in the event I made a mistake. In that case, I do feel like it failed me.”

Tesla’s legal team countered that the accident was entirely McGee’s fault, calling the court’s attention to the driver’s distraction and history of speeding. They pointed out that Autopilot requires the driver’s attention and readiness to take control at all times, even referring to the language in the owner’s manual and warnings displayed in the vehicle.

Data extracted from the Tesla showed that McGee had overridden the car’s adaptive cruise control by pressing the accelerator to 17 miles per hour over the speed limit moments before the crash. Tesla maintained that Autopilot functioned as designed and no known defect contributed to the collision.

The $243M verdict delivers a blow to Tesla’s courtroom track record, which previously included two favorable verdicts in California and multiple confidential settlements.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

免责声明:本网站提供的信息仅供教育和参考之用,不应视为财务或投资建议。

相关文章

tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
日内数据由路孚特(Refinitiv)提供,并受使用条款约束。历史及当前收盘数据均由路孚特提供。所有报价均以当地交易所时间为准。美股报价的实时最后成交数据仅反映通过纳斯达克报告的交易。日内数据延迟至少15分钟或遵循交易所要求。
* 参考、分析和交易策略由第三方提供商Trading Central提供,观点基于分析师的独立评估和判断,未考虑投资者的投资目标和财务状况。
风险提示:我们的网站和移动应用程序仅提供关于某些投资产品的一般信息。Finsights 不提供财务建议或对任何投资产品的推荐,且提供此类信息不应被解释为 Finsights 提供财务建议或推荐。
投资产品存在重大投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金,且可能并不适合所有人。投资产品的过去表现并不代表其未来表现。
Finsights 可能允许第三方广告商或关联公司在我们的网站或移动应用程序的任何部分放置或投放广告,并可能根据您与广告的互动情况获得报酬。
© 版权所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版权所有
KeyAI