tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
検索

LendingTree (TREE) 2026年第3四半期決算説明会:保険事業の成長、14%のEBITDA見通し

Nov 4, 2026 8:08 AM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
すべてのコメントを見る(0)

LendingTreeの2026年第3四半期決算は、保険部門の成長や小規模事業者(SMB)向け融資の改善により、業績予想を上回った。通期の調整後EBITDA成長率の予測は中間値で14%増に引き上げられた。主力の保険部門は好調な市場環境が追い風となり、SMB向け融資も前四半期の底から力強く回復している。住宅部門は金利上昇などの逆風下でも売上高が前年同期比で増加した。同社はフリーキャッシュフローの創出を背景に負債削減を進めつつ、第4四半期に自社株買いの実施を計画している。AI活用による業務効率化も継続している。

AI生成要約

LendingTree(NASDAQ: TREE)は、保険部門の成長と小規模事業者(SMB)向け融資の改善に支えられ、2026年第3四半期決算が自社の業績予想を上回ったと発表した。住宅ローン事業の逆風が続く中、同社は通期の調整後EBITDA成長率の予測を引き上げ、中間値で14%増とした。

主要なポイント

  • 2026年通期の業績予想は、調整後EBITDAの成長率を中間値で14%増とし、経費は約3%増加すると見込んでいる。
  • 第3四半期までの過去12カ月間(TTM)のフリーキャッシュフローは、訴訟関連の支払いを除き1億ドルとなった。
  • LendingTreeは当四半期中に6000万ドルの負債を返済し、有利子負債総額(グロス負債)を前四半期の3億9700万ドルから3億3600万ドルに削減した。長期的な有利子負債総額の目標値は2億ドルとしている。
  • 保険部門は引き続き最も好調な事業であり、保険会社の収益性改善、活発な顧客獲得予算、および最大手クライアントとの入札プラットフォーム展開が想定より早く進んだことが追い風となった。
  • 小規模事業者向け融資は第2四半期の底から改善した。9月と10月のSMBコンシェルジュ売上高は2026年1月以来の最高水準となったが、融資受諾率や平均融資額は過去のピークを下回ったままである。
  • 経営陣は強力なフリーキャッシュフロー創出力を理由に挙げ、負債削減を継続する一方で、第4四半期に自社株買いを実施する計画である。

主要財務データ

指標2026年第3四半期開示情報背景・補足
通期調整後EBITDA成長率業績予想中間値で14%増住宅ローン市場の逆風が続く中で達成
2026年の経費増加率中間値で約3%増コスト規律とAI活用による効率化を反映
2023年比の調整後EBITDA年平均成長率(CAGR)業績予想中間値で25%経営陣による複数年比較
2023年比の経費CAGR3%経営陣によると、概ねインフレ率と同水準
過去12カ月(LTM)フリーキャッシュフロー1億ドル訴訟関連の支払いを除く
四半期負債返済額6000万ドル有利子負債総額を3億3600万ドルに削減
ネットレバレッジ(純有利子負債倍率)1.7倍経営陣の複数年比較における5.3倍から低下
支払利息の削減額500万ドル負債削減による効果
非現金性ののれん減損損失9900万ドル住宅部門および消費者部門で計上
長期有利子負債総額の目標値2億ドル自社株買いと並行して負債返済を継続予定

9900万ドルののれん減損損失は、9月30日時点におけるLendingTreeの時価総額を考慮した減損テストを反映したものである。経営陣は、この減損処理が住宅部門または消費者部門に対する見通しの変更を示すものではないと説明した。

事業および業績状況

保険部門

損害保険事業は引き続きLendingTreeの最大の成長要因となっている。経営陣は業界サイクルについて、安定しており収益性が高く、複数のクライアントがプラットフォーム上で急速に事業を拡大していると説明した。

LendingTreeの最大手保険クライアント向けの新しい入札プラットフォームの導入が予想以上に早く進み、当四半期の業績に寄与した。インフレの再燃や保険会社による大幅な価格還元などの大きな変化がない限り、好調な保険市場環境は2027年、2028年、さらにはそれ以降も続くと経営陣は予想している。

LendingTreeは、保険分野におけるオンライン成果報酬型マーケティングの自社シェアが20%を大幅に下回っていると推計しており、市場全体の拡大に伴いシェア拡大の余地が残されているとみている。

消費者および小規模事業者向け融資

小規模事業者向け融資は、第2四半期に底を打った後、前四半期比で力強い改善を示した。ローンの返済パフォーマンスが安定して推移したことで貸し手のマインドが回復し、前年と同等の金利および条件で融資を提供する動きが戻った。

一方で、事業者の需要回復は緩やかである。融資承認率や平均融資額は2025年第4四半期および2026年第1四半期の過去最高水準を下回っており、中小企業の慎重な姿勢が反映されている。

経営陣によると、SMB部門が当初の予算通りに推移していれば、通期の調整後EBITDAは1億6000万ドルを超えていたという。パーソナルローンなどのその他消費者向け融資カテゴリーは、良好な信用供与環境、安定した返済パフォーマンス、および低失業率に支えられて健全性を維持した。

住宅部門

住宅部門は、長期金利の上昇と厳しい住宅ローン市場環境にもかかわらず、売上高と変動マーケティング粗利益(VMD)の双方で前年同期比成長を達成した。経営陣は、LendingTreeが市場シェアを獲得しており、消費者トラフィックへの投資の成果が出ていると考えている。

ホームエクイティローン(住宅担保ローン)およびHELOC(住宅担保ローン限度枠)が同部門で占める割合が高まっている。経営陣は、これらの商品について新規住宅購入ローンや借り換えローンよりも金利感応度が低いとみており、2027年に向けて住宅エクイティ関連が主要な成長機会であり続けると予想している。

経営陣の試算によると、巡航(ミッドサイクル)状態における住宅部門の正常化収益力は現在の水準より約5000万ドル多いVMDを生み出す可能性があり、その大部分がEBITDAに還元されるという。ただし、同社は住宅ローン環境がいつ回復するかを予測することはできないとしている。

AIと「ノーススター(指針)」戦略

LendingTreeはリピート顧客、紹介、ログインユーザー数の増加を継続して優先課題に掲げている。プロダクト開発には、負債管理ツール、AI生成によるレコメンデーション、シナリオ分析、音声・テキストAI、および自動比較購買支援が含まれている。

AIによる提示条件の概要表示(AIオファー・オーバービュー)は、ログインユーザーから自社ブランドサイト「LendingTree.com」の全ユーザーへと対象が拡大された。同社は2027年初頭までに、すべての消費者向け商品でAIオーバービューを導入する計画である。

経営陣はまた、ソーシャルメディア、ビジネス開発、パブリッシャー、アドアドテック(広告技術)への投資を強化する計画だ。これらは同社が競合他社に比べてプレゼンスが不十分だと認識している分野である。

LendingTreeは、700社を超える保険会社や貸し手からなるネットワークを構造上の強みと捉えている。これらのパートナーの約半分から4分の3は、公開Webサイトでの見積もりではなくバックエンドAPI経由のみで見積もりを提供しており、汎用AIエージェントが同社の比較マーケットプレイスを模倣することを制限している。

業績予想(ガイダンス)

2026年通期業績予想では、調整後EBITDAの成長率を中間値で14%増と見込んでいる。効率的な業務運用とAI活用による生産性向上に支えられ、経費の増加率は約3%に抑えられると経営陣は予想している。

第4四半期については、住宅部門が季節要因により減少する見通しであり、住宅ローン環境の影響で通常の季節性以上の落ち込みとなる可能性がある。消費者部門は、パーソナルローンの季節的落ち込みをSMB事業の季節的な活発化が相殺し、前四半期比で概ね横ばいとなる見込みである。

第4四半期の最大の不透明要因は保険部門である。業績予想には保険会社の予算の季節的な増加を見込んでいるが、近年見られたような異例に大規模な年末予算は織り込んでいない。

同社は2027年の計画策定段階にあり、数値による業績予想は提示しなかった。経営陣は、良好な保険市場環境、住宅部門における住宅エクイティ主導の成長、および事業者のマインド改善に伴うSMB事業の更なる復調を期待している。AIへの投資は増加する可能性があるが、生産性向上によって費用の一部は相殺されると経営陣はみている。

リスクと注力分野

  • 長期金利の高止まりと住宅販売の低迷が引き続き住宅ローン需要の重荷となっている。
  • SMB事業者のマインドが完全に回復しておらず、融資受諾率と平均融資額は以前のピークを下回ったままである。
  • 第4四半期の保険部門の業績は、保険会社の予算投入のタイミングと規模に一部依存する。
  • インフレの再燃や保険料率の下落は、保険会社の収益性や顧客獲得コストへの支出を悪化させる可能性がある。
  • LendingTreeはAI、データインフラ、顧客獲得への追加投資を計画しており、2027年の経費推移に不透明感をもたらしている。
  • 経営陣は大規模言語モデル(LLM)プラットフォームが短期的・中長期的に重大なトラフィック減少をもたらすとは予想していないが、システム連携やエージェント間通信プロトコルへの投資を継続している。

アナリスト質疑応答の要点

アナリストの関心は、保険部門の成長の持続性、SMB回復のペース、AIへの投資需要、および資本配分に集中した。

経営陣は、保険会社の収益性と顧客トラフィックの獲得競争が高水準を維持しているため、保険市場は異例なほど強力な複数年にわたる見通しの良さを備えていると語った。また、LendingTreeはオンライン保険成果報酬型マーケティング市場におけるシェア獲得の機会もあるとみている。

SMB事業に関して、経営陣は第2四半期の低迷の要因として、地政学的懸念や燃料価格への警戒感から貸し手と事業者が慎重姿勢を強めたことを挙げた。その後貸し手の需要は回復したものの、事業者の自信、融資承認率、平均融資額は依然としてピーク水準を下回っている。

AIに関して、同社は主要なLLMやAIプラットフォームとの連携を積極的に推進している。外部のAIエージェントがLendingTreeの特化型エージェントと連携できるインフラを構築中である一方、保険会社側も公開Webサイトより認証済みのログイン環境下での金利・見積もり提供に前向きな姿勢を示している。

資本配分について経営陣は、レバレッジの低下と訴訟関連を除く過去12カ月間のフリーキャッシュフロー(1億ドル)の組み合わせにより、継続的な負債返済と第4四半期からの自社株買い開始の双方をサポートできると述べた。

決算説明会 文字起こし全文


決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト

経営陣による説明

Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to LendingTree, Inc.'s Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Andrew Wessel, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Andrew Wessel

Thank you, James. Hello to everyone joining us on the call to discuss our third quarter 2026 financial results. On with us are Scott Peyree, President and CEO; and Jason Bengel, CFO.

This afternoon, we posted a detailed letter to shareholders and our investor presentation on our Investor Relations website. For the purposes of today's discussion, we'll assume that listeners have gone through those materials, and we'll focus on Q&A.

Before I hand the call over to Scott for his remarks, I remind everyone that during this call, we may discuss our expectations for future performance. Any forward-looking statements that we make are subject to risks and uncertainties, and our actual results could differ materially from the views expressed today. Many but not all of those risks we face are described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. We will also discuss a variety of non-GAAP measures on the call, and I refer you to today's press release and shareholder letter, both available on our website for the comparable GAAP definitions and full reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to GAAP.

And with that, Scott, please go ahead.

Scott Peyree

Thank you, Andrew. Jason and I have a few opening comments before we get into Q&A. First off, we're very excited to provide strong financial results in Q3 that handily beat guidance we put out as well as our updated guidance for the full year assumes adjusted EBITDA growth by 14% at the midpoint despite ongoing headwinds in the mortgage business. This result highlights the durability of our diversified business model.

To hit very briefly on each of our main businesses, starting with insurance. The property and casualty industry cycle remains steady and very strong. We have multiple clients growing very quickly with us. The new bidding platform with our largest client that we were integrating with at the end of Q2 and beginning of Q3 went very well and rolled out faster than we fully expected to and provide a benefit to our business there throughout the quarter, the remainder of the quarter.

On the consumer side, as we expected and communicated in the Q2 earnings call, Q2 was a trough in the performance of the small business lending, and we did see strong sequential growth. We're still on the path to getting back to our all-time records of Q4 of last year and Q1 of this year, but we're feeling that the industry is in a much better position, and we are tracking to continued growth. As a matter of fact, September and October were our 2 best SMB concierge sales month since January of this year. So we definitely think it's heading in the right trajectory.

Just on the consumer lending side, in general, we're seeing strong -- from a client perspective, we're seeing strong lender performance. Credit availability remains very strong. Loan performance remains good. Unemployment rate, which is a big leading indicator a lot of the lenders look at remains very low. So personal loans and the other consumer lending areas remain in a strong and healthy place.

On the Home side, long-term interest rates and overall have definitely gone in the wrong direction this year, which has provided some headwinds. That said, even in those headwinds, we provided strong year-over-year growth in both revenue and VMD. So we're very proud of that. We feel like we're taking market share there. We feel like a number of the investments there we've done to grow consumer traffic have been effective. There still is very strong demand from clients in that space. It's really a matter of finding those qualified consumers that are looking for the loans. But as we mentioned in the letter, home equity has become and HELOC has become a major part of that business, and that business is much less interest rate sensitive and purchase or refinance mortgage. And so we believe heading into next year, we can continue to see growth in the home equity side of that business.

On the North Star strategy, execution continued and stayed strong. Just to remind everyone, we have -- our big focus is on return customers, referred customers and logged-in user growth. On the logged-in user side, we've been building and rolling out a number of tools we're excited about, debt management tools, AI-driven recommendations, scenario tools analysis. We're really looking forward to some of the things we'll be rolling out over the next few quarters, and we've got a long list of features that we think will create a very sticky log-in user base over the long run that will provide return consumers that we can proactively provide our financial and insurance product offering to without paying for those consumers to come through every time.

On just the consumer experience, the shopping experience, the [ Susie ] experience, as we call it internally, which is just to transform and dramatically improve the [ Susie ] experience. We're very happy with improvements we're making there. For example, voice and text AI, we continue to roll out in beta form on multiple fronts where we're bringing AI in to handle a lot of the shopping process on behalf of the consumer until they're closer to application-ready process before we hand them off to the client. We're seeing lots of positive signs on multiple fronts there, really looking to more rapidly and aggressively roll that out as we head into '27.

AI overviews that we're providing mainly to our personal loans customers right now. We've rolled it out from just our log-in users to now all of our branded LendingTree.com users. We're looking to roll out new versions of it for personal loans that are even better and improved on helping when you're sitting on 30 to 50 offers, helping to understand which offer you should select based off of your personal situation. We're seeing a lot of engagement from the consumers there. Our plan is as we get into '27 is to early in '27 to have versions of AI overviews for every product we're offering to the consumers coming through our website.

Moving on, just to hit briefly on -- there's been a lot of conversations that I've had. I'm sure questions will come up here. So I'll just preemptively talk about a little bit, just the AI threat, mainly the LLM threat to our business and our competitors' business versus maybe the reality we're all seeing right now. And I'll start with we have -- as we've looked at it and all the consumers out there, we have the ability to generate way higher increases in traffic through social business development and publishers then we have the threat of losing traffic to LLMs for any in the near or midterm. As we look at the marketplaces out there, there's just -- we're under-indexed in a lot of those categories. We've had a lot of success this year growing those categories. We're going -- we're actively investing heavier to grow at a faster rate in those categories.

And then when you look at the LLMs, I mean, they have been growing. They're taking bigger share. But an analysis I was given a few months ago, if you really look at the overall bucket and if you include search with LLMs is just like a pie of consumers, all of the LLMs added up together are 5% of the search bucket. And as we've seen, like which gets a lot of media, like when new items come out like news, what we're seeing is they're taking share away from the other LLM much more so than they're taking share away from like a Google AI overview search result.

So it's still growing. We're still actively involved. We've got a lot of resources commit to it, whether it's like we're building apps for the LLMs, whether we're making our content available for LLMs to access, whether we're advertising on the LLMs. But I think it's just fair to set the precedent that we don't expect any sort of massive growth in traffic from the LLMs anytime in the near future, nor do we expect any major loss of traffic we're getting from other sources to the LLMs anytime in the near future. And we're excited about the growth we know we can achieve from other areas where consumers are every day in shopping for products that we're offering.

To add to that, LendingTree's carrier and lender network is a big structural moat. We have 700-plus carriers and lenders in our network. Roughly half to 3/4 of these only quote via back-end API access, not open online quoting. So this whole concept of an LLM agent just going and filling out forms on behalf of the consumer, yes, that's true to some extent, but it's very limited in most of the industries we're in, where they can actually get a very good and quality set of comparison quotes. That's where we provide huge advantage. We feel that we can be an extremely useful platform in this world, not just from the breadth of offerings, but also from a compute standpoint with the agents to be a go-to source for the financial product quoting via AI agents.

For example, why would an LLM agent [ use ] burn compute hitting 20 separate personal loan sites when they could just come to our site and get those same 20 quotes by filling out one form through us. And even when I say filling out a form, the protocols of the agents working together, it's not even really they need to fill out a form. They're just communicating with our specialty agents that can provide that on their behalf. Our specialty agents that can be on the phone on behalf to get other quotes that you can only get over the phone. Like we're going to be building a lot of this stuff that the big LLMs just simply aren't going to put the attention to over any time in the near future.

So I just to round that out, I mean, I would say we are very excited about the Agentic AI capabilities we're building to both improve the current shopping experience and transform the shopping experience in general, whether it's consumers using our web-based platform to shop, whether it's LLMs or other Agentic AIs accessing our specialty AI agents to shop or whether it's logged in members to get the benefit of our Agentic AI doing secret shopping and/or actively preparing updated offers in real time on their behalf. We're more confident by the day that we can provide huge value to the consumer in the age of AI.

So with that said, before passing over to Jason to comments on the bigger picture financial performance, I just want to reiterate our excitement about the growth we see ahead of us. The North Star is starting to really show real results on our consumers. We've done a lot of testing throughout '26 of millions of different things of how we can use AI and Agentic AI to transform the shopping experience. We feel like we've identified a number of things that can be used across all of the industries we operate in, and we'll be really investing heavily in rolling that all out on a broad macro basis in 2027 and beyond.

So with that, Jason, go ahead.

Jason Bengel

Thanks, Scott. And I think it's useful just to take a step back. And when you look at the midpoint of our guide versus 2023, you're looking at a 25% EBITDA CAGR. You're looking at expenses with a 3% CAGR, in line with inflation essentially. You're looking at net leverage moving from 5.3 to 1.7. So we've made tremendous progress over the last few years. And looking at 2026, we've had some headwinds in 2026, right, but we're still growing EBITDA well into double digits, 14% when you're looking at the midpoint of the guide. That's because we have a diversified portfolio, like Scott alluded to.

You're looking at within 2026, expenses growing around 3% at the midpoint. That's the result of discipline and a focus on driving internal efficiencies with the use of AI. We expect all that to continue into 2027. And I think what's also interesting is when you look at our cash flow, look at our Q3 LTM cash flow, free cash flow, excluding litigation, it's $100 million. So that's a lot of cash available to return to shareholders. And so coming back to the diversified business point, Insurance is performing extremely well, and we expect it to continue to perform extremely well. Home is in a difficult environment. Mortgage is hard right now. But when you look at that segment, you look at sort of the mid-cycle earnings averaging -- just averaging the peak and the trough of Home, that's about $50 million of VMD, higher than where we are today. And the majority of that would drop to EBITDA. We just can't really get confident that's going to happen soon, but there is a massive potential there for that segment because we have a diversified strong business with a great lender network.

This quarter, we paid down $60 million of debt. We saved $5 million in interest expense, bringing our gross debt down to $336 million, pretty -- approaching pretty close to our $200 million longer-term goal. You'll see in our financials, we did take a noncash goodwill impairment of $99 million in Home and Consumer. And that's really involving testing for impairment where we had to consider our market cap on and around September 30. That resulted in the charge. This doesn't reflect a change in our expectations for these segments, but it does reflect a market cap that implies a free cash flow yield ex litigation north of 25%. So we see the attractiveness in these numbers. We see the attractiveness and the upside in our stock. And so in Q4, we're going to be buying back stock, and we're going to continue paying down debt.

And so with that, I'll hand it over to the operator for Q&A.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jed Kelly from Oppenheimer & Co.

質疑応答

Jed Kelly

Just diving into Insurance, I think one of your competitors last night said they expect this soft market cycle or higher favorable profitability cycle to continue potentially into '28, '29. Are you seeing like the same thing? And do you just have like a good multiyear visibility into insurance over the next couple of years?

Scott Peyree

Yes. I would -- thanks for the question, Jed. I would generally agree with that sentiment you heard yesterday, and it's a very stable industry at this point in the game. And I would say there's probably long term -- it's easier to look out long term and project continued long-term growth today than almost it's ever been. Not that there can't be a big turn where inflation goes way up again or which could affect the insurance companies or they start giving some rate back to the consumers, which affects their profitability.

But yes, I think the industry is more stable now than it's been in a long, long time. It's very profitable. In general, we're seeing -- and I'm sure not just us, our competitors as well are just seeing more players get more aggressive with budget, which is very good for a marketplace business like ours where you have more competition for those consumer clicks. Yes, I would say to '28 and beyond, I mean, outside of some major shift, there's a lot of continued growth, I would expect in that industry.

Another interesting thing I would comment there is like when we look at just the -- like when we look at our market share versus the overall industry, like in insurance, in online performance marketing, which is essentially where we sit in insurance, we probably actually have a lower market share than just about any other industry we're in, even with as big as insurance is for our business. My guess is we are well below 20% market share just within our group. So like there's the whole industry that's going to keep growing for the next few years, and then there's the ability to grow our market share within that industry. So yes, I would have very positive outlook for the insurance industry right now.

Jed Kelly

Great. And then I think, Jason, you mentioned expenses have grown about 3%. Just with AI, how do you feel like relative to your competitors, your opportunity, how do you think you're invested in AI? Do you think -- I mean, do you think you can continue growing expenses at 3%, 4%? Or do you think you're going to have to invest more so you can kind of better harvest this technology? Thanks.

Jason Bengel

Yes. I mean it's -- we're not -- we're still in the 2027 planning phases, I guess. So it's hard to put out a number at this point. But we've had a lot of success using tools that we have today to drive a lot of efficiency on the AI front. When you look at how we run marketing and just using data agents, for example, within marketing, the amount that we've been able to upskill our marketing team by using agents to handle sort of the data gathering and analysis part of their jobs allows them to become much, much more efficient marketers.

And so we're using the tools that we have today with a lot of success, and we fully intend to keep doing that. It is possible that as we move into 2027, we do wind up investing more in AI, but we would expect an outsized increase in productivity moving forward.

Scott Peyree

Yes. And I would just add in there. Yes, it's a little bit of both. Like there's areas we're going to invest into. Like data is a critically important area to have quality of data infrastructure for AI to work effectively, log-in experience, like I was saying. So -- but you can -- just like everyone, you can get so much more done with fewer people in this age of AI. And then at the same time, we're looking where AI can provide efficiencies. So it kind of levels out to some extent when you look at it that way.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Youssef Squali from Truist.

Youssef Squali

Scott, I was intrigued by your comments about working with LLM platforms, at least in theory to integrate some of your capabilities within the agent results. Are you actually talking to some of these platforms? And kind of what kind of feedback are you getting from? What kind of reception are you getting from? And I have a follow-up.

Scott Peyree

Yes. We're actively engaged in some platforms more so than others. But it's -- yes, honestly, these companies are growing so fast. They help you where they can. They give you directional information as far as like a lot of these times, they don't even know how their systems work any more than anyone else knows how it works. So they're trying to give you directional like, okay, here's where we believe the AI is finding value and not finding value. There's definitely a number of -- like -- and this is more of a recent thing. A number of, I guess I'll call them Internet protocols are starting to be developed that makes it easier for like AI agents to communicate with companies like ours.

And so I think the fact that we're making sure we're building our platforms to be able to easily communicate with LLM agents, like because not everyone is going to be doing that, obviously, not that we're the only ones doing it. But I mean, the group of us are going to be front end doing that, we'll do it. But yes, I mean, I would say all the major LLMs or just AI companies we've got relationships with. There's only so much they know or they can tell you, but they can help you direct you the way it should be going.

Youssef Squali

Got it. Okay. And then maybe on the other 2 subsegments, Home and Consumer, it's very encouraging to see that you guys still posted positive growth. As we look at 2027, can you maybe just kind of share your initial outlook as to kind of the potential growth prospects for these and still the headwinds ahead ex maybe just rates, which God knows what's going to happen there.

Jason Bengel

Yes. I mean I'll start and then Scott can chime in here. I mean, like I said, we're still a little early in our planning for 2027. So we're not putting out guidance or numbers really at this point. But just thinking about the backdrop, like Scott said, insurance, we expect continued tailwinds for a while. Combined ratios are still very low. I think carriers are going to very carefully manage those combined ratios. Competitiveness is very high. And so I think we'll have a very favorable environment in insurance moving into 2027 and beyond.

Home, like you said, it's a bit more challenging, right? Like it's -- mortgage is in a hard spot. The home sales are at a very, very low level. I want to say 20, 40-year low. So it's hard to be excited about mortgage. But at this point, is really driven by Home equity. And there are record home equity balances and people are renovating their homes. So like there's a real opportunity within home equity to drive growth.

I guess I would say we're really excited about the opportunity to drive traffic. And Scott touched on it, but we're under-indexed in several channels that we fully intend to lean into in 2027 and beyond. And our strategy is focused on driving organic traffic. And we think we can have a real impact moving into 2027 and beyond there as well. So it's a little bit early to be putting out numbers, but I think the backdrop is generally favorable for insurance. It's a little bit complex with home, but it's going to be home equity driven. Consumer, it's really about SMB. We did see a lot of headwinds in SMB early in the year. That's improved. It's been improving. I think we expect it to continue to improve, but it's hard to really guarantee that. So it's really more about how are we going to execute to find additional traffic moving into 2027 and make those investments to keep driving growth.

Scott Peyree

Yes. Then I would just add in briefly. Small business, if it continues to recover. I mean that's a big wildcard. If it gets back to where it was in Q4, Q1 this past year, which is very well good, that would be major growth in and of itself. So that's something we're excited about. And then as I said before, like a real focus on getting more and more users to sign up to become log-in members, which of LendingTree and active users, which increases our long-term value, decreases our cost of acquisition over the long run. Those are the major metrics. So I mean, so if we can start showing improving out those metrics, that will have a significant impact, not only on profitability, but just ability to drive more consumers on top of the funnel.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Tomasello from KBW.

Ryan Tomasello

Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions. Hearing a lot of comments about the focus on growing organic traffic and investing there and understand that makes sense over the long term. But I just want to make sure we're understanding that properly, if there's anything you're telegraphing there around incremental investment next year? And how should we think about the ability to continue to sustain double-digit EBITDA growth even if we do see some incremental investment in parts of the business like that?

Scott Peyree

Yes, I'll hit on it. There's basically 2 lens. We think there's ability to grow a lot of organic traffic by a number of the things we're building in the log-in experience and just being better about more proactively. We've already been doing some testing about more proactively getting consumers that are upfront shopping for whatever product they're shopping for to get them to become log-in members. And I would say we're pretty excited about our ability to onboard members. And so then you got to create that long-term value. That would be like the organic growth.

But then we also feel that there's a lot of growth just in areas where we've arguably been under-indexed compared to our competitors over the last number of years. And that would be social media, which is a massive world of consumers, business development, publishers. We've been building a lot of ad tech around that over the past 9 months, and we'll probably continue investing even more heavily in that to just really get -- to have really good platforms that good ad tech where we can go and place our ads and have publishers and partners more easy to work with us. We feel like that's just a major -- like I would almost call it, if you build it, they will come situation, like we just got to build more of the stuff, onboard more partners, and that will just drive a lot more traffic there as well.

Ryan Tomasello

Great. I appreciate that. And then as a follow-up on SMB. Maybe, Scott, if you can just put a finer point on the -- how the recovery trajectory looked in that business coming out of the second quarter, whether or not you learned anything incremental on the drivers of the earlier weakness, what questions might still be out there and how you're thinking about that recovery progressing into next year?

Scott Peyree

Yes. I would say -- so in Q2, the biggest drivers we had bad for at least early Q2, bad lender sentiment and mainly because these lenders have written a lot of loans in the previous like 6 to 9 months, and they just kind of wanted to -- Iran war started, et cetera, they just want to take a time out and just make sure the loans were performing. And then you had bad merchant sentiment, which a lot of it was gas prices and the Iran war stuff. And I think small and medium-sized businesses are probably honestly even more sensitive to that than consumer lending even is.

And so when we got out of Q2, what we saw the lender sentiment completely turned around, where they're like, "Okay, our loans are performing. Everything is going great. Let's get back to business." We're just -- we're offering loans at the same rate and term that we were a year ago. So that's fully recovered. So that's a really good part. The merchant sentiment has recovered, but not fully. That's where we're still seeing the take rates on loans are lighter than they were in our peak Q4, Q1 peaks and then the average size of loan is a little lighter. And we just feel that's still just kind of a little bit of merchant sentiment, just concern on the macro economy and stuff. But I mean, that's something we fully -- once the sentiment turns around, we -- I mean, we have a long-term history of like what the take rate on loans generally is and what the average loan size really is and no reason to believe we won't be right back there.

Ryan Tomasello

Any way to quantify how far below you are on those take rates and average loan sizes?

Jason Bengel

I mean, I guess one way to look at it is comparing to our original budget. And if SMB was performing at the original budget, we would be north of $160 million EBITDA this year.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Danny Pfeiffer from JPMorgan.

Daniel Pfeiffer

For the first, as you have discussions with insurance carriers, can you talk about what their mindset is as it relates to partnering versus blocking AI agents and where LendingTree might fit in that equation?

And then on the second, on the topic of making progress on logged-in member experience, can you talk about your ambitions here? And if you could share any stats on the member base today in terms of like size, return frequency or monetization?

Scott Peyree

I'll start with the first part of the question, just with the insurance carriers. And I would say like, yes, insurance carriers historically, they just -- they don't want their rate tables publicly available to the world because they don't want to start this downward spiral of everyone having to give rate and it's like everyone has to low ball on the upfront rate. If you rewind the insurance industry like 30 years ago, it was a similar problem where they were more public with the rates, but then it was just -- they had to low ball for the first 6 months and then jack everyone's insurance rate up by 50% after 6 months, horrible consumer experience, like, they don't want to get back to that world, and they've made it very clear.

So when they look at like some of these agents like a news coming out and being able to scrape sites that provide rates publicly, which honestly is not a ton of carriers that do that, but there are some that do that. I think like I was saying in the market share of LLMs overall right now, the quantity of consumers actually using LLMs to shop for insurance, I don't think it's -- I don't think they're seeing the quantity that it really concerns them yet.

Now if they started all of a sudden seeing hundreds of thousands of unique rate requests a day, my guess is they would pretty quickly shut that down. Now where they work with us and after working with us, getting back to the logged-in experience, we've had a number of carriers already tell them we're actively building with some. They're like, okay, you're logged in. We don't want to show rates on your public-facing site, but you're logged-in users that are your users, we're more than happy to show rates and let you do secret shopping and provide a lot of value that way. And that's a perfect example where I think our platform is a Specialty Agentic AI platform in the Insurance and Financial services space will be much greater than what any LLM that has honestly much bigger fish to fry will accomplish.

And could you -- what was your second question?

Daniel Pfeiffer

Yes. And maybe on the second, if you could provide any stats or anything on the log-in user base in terms of anything like the size or return frequency or monetization?

Scott Peyree

No, we're not currently providing any stats on those front publicly.

Daniel Pfeiffer

Got it. Thank you.

Scott Peyree

Just for competitive reasons.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Grondahl from Northland.

Mike Grondahl

A question on your 4Q guidance. Scott, would you say that, that pretty much reflects seasonality, typical seasonality in the business? Or is there, I don't know, a weakness in the business line you hadn't expected earlier in the year? Just trying to get a feel for how you're thinking about that 4Q.

Jason Bengel

Yes, I can start and then Scott will chime in. I mean we just go segment by segment, I guess, like Home is seasonally lower in Q4. It might be a little bit more low than normal seasonality just given the environment. Consumer is generally going to be flat sequentially Q3 to Q4 with sort of offsetting seasonality between personal loans and small business. Small business has a strong Q4. Personal loans tends to have a weaker Q4. The real uncertainty is with insurance. The last few years, we have gotten very large budgets towards the end of Q4, and so the guide isn't assuming the sort of budgets that we've gotten in prior years. We are assuming we do get sort of a seasonal uptick in insurance budgets, but just less than we have in the prior years. We're just being conservative there. So that is inherent in the guide. But no, there's no single business that's performing particularly poorly Q3 to Q4 to answer your question.

Scott Peyree

And just to add -- the only thing I would add on there is if you look year-over-year, the biggest driver probably is small business. So small business keeps improving from the Q2 trough. But again, I'll reiterate that Q4, Q1 were all-time highs last year for us. And so like even though we're improving and we're coming back, there's still a ways to go to get to those levels, and that's probably the single biggest driver if you look year-over-year.

Mike Grondahl

Got it. That's helpful. And then on the buyback, it seems like you signaled you're going to be engaging in that here in 4Q. Is there 1 or 2 metrics? I mean, I imagine maybe it's debt to adjusted EBITDA has gotten to a level where you're comfortable. It seems like the cost structure, you've got your arms around really tight with inflation growth. Help us think about your kind of appetite for buyback and amongst those metrics.

Jason Bengel

Yes. I mean we're looking at a lot of things. Our debt -- we declared our target debt level is $200 million. In last quarter, we were sitting on $397 million of gross debt in a rising interest rate environment relative to our $200 million target. So we made a big dent in that debt, and we're going to continue paying down debt and returning money to shareholders that way.

When it comes to the buybacks, when you look at where our stock is and has been compared to our free cash flow, it's just pretty obvious that it is an attractive opportunity that we're going to take advantage of. We drove -- like I said, we drove looking back trailing 12 months, $100 million of free cash flow when you exclude litigation payments and you look at that relative to our market cap, it becomes pretty compelling pretty quickly. So that's a big one that we're looking at as well as our EBITDA multiple and the growth implied in it. It all points to a pretty easy decision to lean in and buy back shares in Q4.

Mike Grondahl

Great. I know it's taken a lot of hard work in a couple of years to get there, but congratulations, guys.

Operator

Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it back to CEO, Scott Peyree, for closing remarks.

Scott Peyree

Thank you. Just to close, we appreciate you all joining the call and asking the questions you asked. We're just looking forward to continuing to execute and being able to report on continued improvements in the business next quarter. Have a good evening.

Operator

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program, and you may now disconnect.

この記事の一部はAIによって生成・翻訳され、人間によるレビューを経ています。これは一般的な情報提供の目的でのみ使用されており、投資アドバイスを構成するものではありません。

免責事項:本サイトで提供する情報は教育・情報提供を目的としたものであり、金融・投資アドバイスとして解釈されるべきではありません。

コメント (0)

$ボタンをクリックし、シンボルを入力して、株式、ETF、またはその他のティッカーシンボルをリンクします。

0/500
コメントガイドライン
読み込み中...

おすすめ記事

tradingkey.logo
リスク告知:当社ウェブサイト及びモバイルアプリは特定の投資商品に関する一般的な情報のみを提供しており、Finsightsは金融アドバイスや投資商品の推奨を行うものではありません。本情報の提供をもってFinsightsが投資助言を行っていると解釈されることはありません。
投資商品には元本割れを含む重大なリスクが伴い、全ての投資家に適するものではありません。なお、過去の運用実績は将来の成果を保証するものではありません。
Finsightsは、第三者広告主または提携先が当社ウェブサイト・モバイルアプリ上に広告を掲載することを許可する場合があり、これら広告主から広告への反応に基づく報酬を受けることがあります。
© 著作権: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 無断複写・転載を禁じます。