Siqi Chen lança token Zero (ZERO), afirma que puxar o tapete foi um erro
Siqi Chen causou outro momento caótico nos círculos de tokens meme, após lançar o token Zero (ZERO). Ele então apresentou uma ordem de venda, alegando que era um erro, depois comprou de volta e queimou seus ganhos.
Siqi Chen, CEO da Runway e cofundador da Serious Business, mais uma vez causou o caos no mundo dos tokens meme. Uma puxada de tapete e um token chegando a zero não seriam notados se não fosse pelo perfil público de Chen e pelas recentes perdas do token MIRA. O MIRA foi lançado em 25 de dezembro, concedendo uma parte dos tokens a Chen. Essa participação expandiu-se brevemente de cerca de US$ 440 mil para US$ 6 milhões em valor nocional, impulsionada pelo hype de pertencer a uma instituição de caridade legítima de pesquisa do câncer.
Chen lançou o ZERO com um aviso de que é um token de teste que chegaria a zero. Como a negociação de tokens meme geralmente usa bots, houve, de fato, ordens de compra, injetando imediatamente liquidez no SOL e aumentando o valor do token. A certa altura, Chen vendeu ZERO, adquirindo 444 SOL, depois reverteu isso e demonstrou que não tinha lucros.
então lancei um token de teste chamado zero, com a descrição: “isso vai para zero… não compre” pensando que as pessoas iriam ler e não comprar.
não esperava que todos pudessem apenas ver e comprar - pensei que era algo sobre o qual eu precisaria twittar.… pic.twitter.com/bH4b0PIlJH
– Siqi Chen (@blader) 30 de dezembro de 2024
On-chain researcher ZachXBT raised objections, showing that Chen also bought another token, ChAIrity, also placing a sell order that crashed the price. After the second token launch, however, Chen has stated he is ready to make some of the losing parties whole, despite the token warnings. Others warned Chen to avoid paying those that claim ZERO caused losses, as the token had a clear warning. No payments or compensation has been offered for MIRA traders, who managed to take much more significant profits.
The ZERO token still holds $141K in liquidity, and has not actually gone to zero. Since bots and irrational buyers are always active, the asset may see ongoing activity and not be abandoned. Until then, ZERO may continue to lead to losses, or put pressure on Chen to recover the damages.
MIRA continues to slide as a charity token
The older MIRA token continues to slide, showing that mixing charity and meme token trading has a big downside. MIRA pumped again to $0.026, then erased 50% of its value to $0.013. The token has only $814K in liquidity and has survived for several days.
Chen has warned he expects the token to go to zero, as he continued selling to take profits for his cancer research charity. At the same time, early buyers blamed him for not warning about potential losses. Whales were also easily taking profit, benefitting from the charity hype.
Initially, Chen said he did not mind the profit potential of MIRA, despite causing losses for the community. Some of the early wallets achieved profits of over $480K, essentially taking away funds that some buyers thought would go to charity. While MIRA was more efficient than the GoFundMe approach, it also led to great inefficiencies as traders sold their early positions.
MIRA gets boost from Binance Alpha
Despite whale selling, and despite warnings that Chen would liquidate his entire share of MIRA, the token may continue to trade. MIRA was added as one of the daily selections of Binance Alpha, allowing for fast purchases.
MIRA has already spread to 11,944 holders, and new whales have appeared. The token also sees activity from high-volume clusters. The clusters are unrelated to Chen’s known wallet.
As of December 31, part of the donation is still in Chen’s wallet, valued at around $1.1M after the recent price slide. MIRA can only be sold in small batches, due to its low liquidity. The token still lacks market-makers, and there is no long-term strategy for continuing its charity purpose.
With MIRA and ZERO, Chen may find himself involved with an unintended crypto community, who may continue to pump the token and demand exposure.
After the introduction of MIRA, the brief charity token trend subsided. The one asset that remained more active was ChAIrity, with only $50K in liquidity. The token pumped briefly, then lost more than 90% of its value as most of the holders were selling. Even those that wanted to donate to charity were reluctant to give up their funds to whales, instead of an actual charity.
From Zero to Web3 Pro: Your 90-Day Career Launch Plan
Artigos relacionados
PETR4 - O Balanço de Petrobras - Vale a Pena Comprar a Ação PETR4 pela Análise Técnica?
No vídeo "PETR4 - O Balanço de Petrobras - Vale a Pena Comprar a Ação PETR4 pela Análise Técnica?" compartilho um setup baseado em análise gráfica e de indicador da análise técnica para que você tome a sua melhor decisão de comprar ou não a ação PETR4 no curtíssimo prazo (dentro da semana ou poucos
BRKM5 Vale a Pena Comprar as Ações da Braskem? Análise Técnica - Análise Gráfica
Neste vídeo compartilho o meu melhor entendimento , baseado na análise técnica, sobre melhores momentos para comprar a ação BRKM5 da Braskem, visando o curto prazo. Para terem ideia, a ação BRKM5 hoje (04/02) chamou a atenção na bolsa de valores brasileira com valorização da ação BRKM5 de 4,04%...
Vale (VALE3): Acordo de Mariana e estes fatores pressionam as ações, diz Levante
Investing.com – Com queda das ações da Vale (BVMF:VALE3) desde o início do ano, as incertezas a respeito do acordo envolvendo o rompimento da barragem em Mariana (MG), al&ea
