ミラム・ファーマシューティカルズ（MIRM）2026年第3四半期決算説明会：売上高は1億8,600万ドルに達し、ガイダンスを引き上げ

要点

• 第3四半期の製品純売上高は、前年同期の1億3,300万ドルから約40%増となる約1億8,600万ドルに達した。
• LIVMARLIは引き続き主力を担う成長要因となり、米国内での1億ドルを含む1億3,300万ドルの製品純売上高を計上した。経営陣は、最近の成長に対する最大の貢献要因として成人進行性家族性肝内胆汁うっ滞症（PFIC）を挙げた。
• Mirumは、最初の9カ月間に約5億2,200万ドルを計上したことを受け、2026年通期の製品純売上高ガイダンスを7億1,500万〜7億2,000万ドルに引き上げた。
• 同社の9月末時点における現金および現金同等物ならびに投資有価証券の残高は約5億ドルとなった。同四半期の営業活動に使用した現金は約400万ドルだった。
• Atebriozは9月に12歳以上の進行性骨化性線維異形成症（FOP）患者向けに承認され、10月に米国での販売が開始された。経営陣は、上市はまだ初期段階にあるとしつつも、患者、介護者、医師からの初期の関心は非常に強いと述べた。
• Mirumは、volixibat、Brelovitug、Atebrioz、LIVMARLIにわたる5件の薬事申請または適応拡大の可能性に向けて取り組みを進めている。経営陣は、商業的成長とパイプラインの進展により、同社が2027年にキャッシュフローを黒字化できる態勢が整うと見込んでいる。

主要財務データ

事業および業績の動向

LIVMARLIは引き続きMirumの商業的成長を牽引した。アラジール症候群について、経営陣は新規患者の投与開始、治療継続率、体重に応じた投与量の増加を要因に挙げた。成人PFICは最大の増収要因であり、経営陣は米国内の対応可能市場（TAM）となる患者が少なくとも2,000人存在し、その大半が依然として未診断であると推計している。

同社は、遅発性PFICの疾患啓発および遺伝子検査に関する営業活動を拡大している。経営陣は、このインフラがvolixibatやBrelovitugの将来的な上市支援にもつながるとしている。

Mirumの胆汁酸治療薬は、同四半期に5,200万ドルの売上高を記録した。CHOLBAMは希少疾病用医薬品の独占期間をすでに経過しているが、CTEXLIは希少疾病用医薬品の保護期間を維持している。同社は、新たな市場参入者は確認されていないと述べた。

Atebriozは、成人および12歳以上の小児FOP患者を対象とした9月の承認を受け、Mirumにとって4番目の商用医薬品となった。10月には米国での販売が開始された。上市に伴う売上高ガイダンスは提示されなかったものの、経営陣はLIVMARLIの初期導入時よりも速いペースでの普及を見込んでいる。

ポートフォリオ全体で臨床開発も進展した。LIVMARLIの第III相EXPAND試験では、主要評価項目および事前に規定されたすべての副次評価項目を達成し、経営陣は胆道閉鎖症における結果を強調した。Atebriozの極めて重要なPROGRESS試験コホート2では、6歳以上12歳未満の小児において異所性骨化の減少や有望な関節可動域のデータなど、コホート1と一貫した結果が得られた。

Brelovitugについては、第III相AZURE-1試験でウイルス学的指標および肝疾患活動性指標の改善が示された。Mirumは2026年末までにAZURE-4試験の結果が出ると見込んでいる。原発性胆汁性胆管炎（PBC）を対象としたvolixibatのVANTAGE試験の結果発表は、引き続き2027年第1四半期に予定されている。経営陣は、中間データにおいて成人のItchRO評価項目でプラセボ調整後2ポイント以上の改善が示されたと指摘した。

経営陣のガイダンス

• Mirumは、2026年通期の製品純売上高ガイダンスを7億1,500万〜7億2,000万ドルに引き上げた。
• 経営陣は、主に成人PFICが牽引し、ポートフォリオ全体の成長にも支えられる形で、前四半期比で約1,000万〜1,500万ドルの増収という直近のペースが2027年まで継続すると予想している。
• 現金ベースの研究開発費は、今後約2四半期にわたり売上高の約50%近辺にとどまる見込みである。その後、この比率は急速に低下し、長期的には10%に近づくと経営陣は予想している。
• 同社は、商業的成長の継続とパイプラインの着実な進捗を背景に、2027年にキャッシュフローが黒字化すると予想している。
• Mirumは、2027年上半期に原発性硬化性胆管炎（PSC）を対象とするvolixibatの新薬承認申請（NDA）提出を、また同期間に6歳以上12歳未満の小児を対象とするAtebriozの適応追加承認申請（sNDA）提出を計画している。
• AZURE-4試験で良好な結果が得られることを前提として、Mirumは2027年上半期にデルタ肝炎を対象とするBrelovitugの生物製剤承認申請（BLA）を提出する計画である。
• PBCを対象としたvolixibatの第III相VANTAGE試験の結果発表は、2027年第1四半期に予定されている。

リスクと注目点

volixibatのPSC申請計画は、引き続き米食品医薬品局（FDA）との進行中の協議次第である。経営陣は、協議の目的はあらゆる段階で完全な合意を得ることではなく、申請前にFDAがVISTASデータセットへの理解を深めることにあると述べた。新たに作成されたPSCと炎症性腸疾患に関する分析は、これまでFDAによって審査されていなかった。

Brelovitugの申請は、AZURE-4試験の良好な結果に依存している。AZURE-1試験とAZURE-4試験は、一貫して米国での申請に向けた2試験からなる第III相パッケージとして提案されてきた。

成人PFICおよびデルタ肝炎においては、診断率の低さが依然として商業上の制約となっている。経営陣によると、対象となり得る成人PFIC患者の大半が未診断であり、米国のB型肝炎患者のうちデルタ肝炎の検査を受けたことがある患者は過去数%にとどまっている。

CHOLBAMは希少疾病用医薬品の独占期間が終了しており、競合に関する潜在的な懸念が生じている。しかし、Mirumはジェネリック医薬品などの新規参入者は見られていないと述べている。CTEXLIは引き続き希少疾病用医薬品の保護対象となっている。

Mirumが複数の後期開発プログラムおよびBrelovitugの製造活動に資金を投入していることから、短期的な研究開発集約度は高水準にとどまっている。同社は、この支出水準がさらに約2四半期続くと予想している。

アナリスト質疑応答の要点

• ガイダンスの牽引要因：経営陣は、売上高見通し引き上げの最大の牽引役は成人PFICであり、アラジール症候群や胆汁酸ポートフォリオも貢献していると述べた。
• 武田薬品からの受注：第3四半期の武田薬品関連の売上高はごくわずかであり、Mirumは第4四半期に新規受注を見込んでいない。
• Atebriozの上市：初期の引き合いや採用の兆候は好調と説明された。経営陣はLIVMARLIよりも速い普及曲線を見込んでいるが、詳細な上市指標を公表するには時期尚早であると述べた。
• PSC申請：Mirumは2027年上半期のNDA提出目標を維持した。同社はVISTASデータセットに自信を維持しているが、FDAとの協議について個々の会合ごとの進捗報告は行っていない。
• HDV市場の開拓：MirumはB型肝炎患者を治療する医療提供者を対象に、疾患啓発および教育活動を開始した。経営陣は、治療選択肢が整うにつれて検査への関心が高まると予想している。
• ピーク時売上高の枠組み：経営陣は、デルタ肝炎におけるBrelovitugの売上高が10億ドル超に達する潜在力を改めて強調し、米国の対応可能市場（TAM）としてそう痒症を伴うPSC患者約2万人、PBC患者約5万人に言及した。これらの数値は、ポートフォリオ全体のピーク時売上高が40億ドル超に達する可能性があるというMirumの幅広い見通しの一部をなしている。
• 資本構成：Mirumは2029年満期転換社債の額面2,000万ドル分を現金約6,200万ドルで買い戻した。第2四半期の資金調達と合わせ、同社は2029年満期社債の発行残高を80%超削減した。

決算説明会トランスクリプト全文

決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト

経営陣による説明

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Good afternoon, and welcome to Mirum Pharmaceuticals Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Joel, and I will be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to Andrew McKibben, SVP of Strategic Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Andrew McKibben

Thank you, Joel, and good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to Mirum Pharmaceuticals Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. I'm joined today by our Chief Executive Officer, Chris Peetz; our President and Chief Operating Officer, Peter Radovich; our Chief Medical Officer, Rob Myers; and our Chief Financial Officer, Eric Bjerkholt.

Earlier today, Mirum issued a press release announcing the company's results for the third quarter of 2026. Copies of the press release and our SEC filings are available on the Investors section of our website. Before we start, I'd like to remind you that during the course of this conference call, we'll be making certain forward-looking statements based on management's current expectations, including statements regarding Mirum's programs and market opportunities for its approved medicines and product candidates and financial guidance. These statements represent our judgment and knowledge of events as of today and inherently involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed.

We are under no duty to update these statements. Please refer to the risk factors in our latest Form 10-Q and subsequent SEC filings for more information about these risks and uncertainties. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Chris. Chris?

Christopher Peetz

Thanks, Andrew. Third quarter was another strong period for Mirum, both commercially and across our clinical programs. We generated $186 million in third quarter net product sales, and we are increasing our full year net product sales guidance to $715 million to $720 million.

We've also had great progress across the portfolio since our last earnings call, positive phase III AZURE-1 data for Brelovitug, positive EXPAND data for LIVMARLI, the approval and launch of Atebrioz, and another positive Atebrioz readout in younger patients. Our recent progress feels quite meaningful as Mirum approaches its eighth anniversary. It's remarkable to think about what this team has accomplished in 8 years. We started Mirum around a simple idea that by identifying important opportunities in rare diseases, combining great medicines with relentless execution, we could have a meaningful impact for patients and build an enduring company. 8 years later, we now have 4 approved medicines, a commercial business approaching $0.75 billion in annual net product sales and a late-stage pipeline with multiple opportunities to drive our next phase of growth. Coming up, we have 2 more potentially registrational readouts approaching with the Brelovitug AZURE-4 study in HDV expected this quarter and the volixibat VANTAGE study in PBC expected in the first quarter of next year. Together, these are part of 5 potential approvals and label expansions ahead of us as we work towards realizing the greater than $4 billion peak revenue potential of the Mirum portfolio.

So 8 years in, we're entering our next phase from a position of real strength, and we're excited to touch on some highlights and updates today. With that, I'll turn the call over to Peter. Peter?

Peter Radovich

Thanks, Chris. The third quarter was another excellent quarter for Mirum's commercial business with $186 million in net product sales. LIVMARLI continues to be the primary growth driver, with third quarter net product sales of $133 million, including $100 million in the United States.

Our bile acid medicines also provided steady growth, generating $52 million in net product sales for the quarter. Continued growth across LIVMARLI and our bile acid medicines has allowed us to increase that outlook throughout the year. And based on our performance through the first 9 months, we are increasing full year guidance today to $715 million to $720 million. This is a testament to our high-impact medicines and high-performing team dedicated to getting them to patients.

For a little more color on LIVMARLI. In Alagille syndrome, uptake remains steady and durable, supported by new patient starts, persistence on therapy and weight-based dose increases. PFIC continues to be an important driver, particularly among adults, where we believe there are at least 2,000 addressable patients in the United States, though the substantial majority of these patients remain undiagnosed.

Greater awareness of later onset PFIC and increasing use of genetic testing will continue to help improve diagnosis rates. And we are expanding our commercial efforts on this front, which should lay a strong foundation for 2027. This expansion will also enable our other upcoming potential launches for LIVMARLI, volixibat and Brelovitug. I'm also happy to say that our fourth medicine, Atebrioz, was approved in September for adults and pediatric FOP patients ages 12 and older, and our U.S. launch commenced in October.

Atebrioz is a natural addition to our rare genetic disease business. The FOP community is uniquely engaged and the response to the approval to date reinforces our belief that Atebrioz can address a significant unmet need for patients and families living with FOP with the convenience of oral dosing and a mechanism designed to address the underlying cause of the disease.

Our near-term focus is on patient identification and access, and we're encouraged by the strong early engagement from patients, caregivers and health care professionals. Overall, I'm very happy with the progress we made this quarter. We are growing our existing medicines, launching our fourth medicine and laying a strong foundation for multiple new potential indications and launches in 2027 and beyond. With that, I'll turn it over to Rob. Rob?

Rob Myers

Thanks, Peter. It's been an exciting couple of months for Mirum, significant clinical progress across rare liver and rare genetic -diseases. We are now working towards 5 potential regulatory submissions across the portfolio, NDAs for volixibat in PSC and PBC, a BLA for Brelovitug and hepatitis delta, a label expansion for Atebrioz in FOP and an sNDA for LIVMARLI based on the EXPAND study. Starting with volixibat and PSC, we continue to make progress toward our planned NDA submission in the first half of 2027.

We remain confident in the strength of the VISTAS results and the potential for volixibat to address an important unmet need for patients with PSC and pruritus. We look forward to submitting our NDA and we'll provide an update if there's any material change in our plans or an FDA's prior feedback. We've also recently reported positive results from 3 important studies across the portfolio.

In FOP, Cohort 2 of the pivotal PROGRESS study extended the encouraging Atebrioz results into children ages 6 to under 12. The results were consistent with Cohort 1 with reductions in heterotopic ossification, encouraging improvements in joint mobility and a safety profile consistent with that observed in older patients.

The mobility findings are particularly encouraging in a progressive disease like FOP, where preserved function by -- preserving function by intervening early is especially important. Our next step is a planned sNDA submission in the first half of 2027, to potentially expand Atebrioz to children ages 6 to under 12. Cohort 3 evaluating zilurgisertib in even younger children continues to enroll.

Now turning to the liver portfolio. EXPAND was another positive Phase III study for LIVMARLI, meeting its primary endpoint and all prespecified secondary endpoints with particularly encouraging results in biliary atresia. These findings further strengthen the body of evidence supporting IBAT inhibition for pruritus across a range of underlying cholestatic liver diseases. And in hepatitis delta, the positive Phase III AZURE-1 results provide important validation for Brelovitug, demonstrating meaningful improvements across key measures of virologic and liver disease activity.

We'll build on this momentum at AASLD later this week, where we'll present new data across our rare liver disease portfolio, including the full AZURE-1 results and longer-term Brelovitug data as well as additional analyses from VISTAS and LIVMARLI data in rare cholestatic liver disease.

Without getting ahead of these presentations, we're particularly excited by the growing body of evidence with Brelovitug, showing deepening virologic suppression and continued improvements in ALT normalization and liver stiffness with longer treatment, including in patients with cirrhosis, a population with particularly urgent unmet medical need.

Looking beyond AASLD, we expect the AZURE full readout this quarter, an important next milestone for the Brelovitug program and our planned BLA submission in the first half of 2027. Overall, these recent clinical successes, together with the regulatory milestones ahead, give us strong confidence in the potential for our portfolio to deliver meaningful new treatment options for patients. With that, I'll turn it over to Eric to discuss the financials. Eric?

Eric Bjerkholt

Thanks, Rob, and good afternoon, everyone. Our third quarter financial performance reflects our ongoing operating priorities, continued top line growth with focused investment in bringing our late-stage programs through several potential approvals and launches. As Peter mentioned, net product sales for the third quarter were approximately $186 million compared with $133 million in the third quarter last year. Through the first 9 months of the year, net product sales were approximately $522 million, which I'm excited to point out already equals full year 2025 revenues.

In the third quarter, the cash contribution margin from our commercial business was in the high 50s percent of sales and cash used in operations was approximately $4 million. Total operating expenses for the quarter were approximately $245 million. cost of sales of approximately $28 million, SG&A expense of approximately $70 million, R&D expense of approximately $94 million, all on a cash basis, in-process research and development of $13 million and stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expense of $40 million.

Our investment in R&D reflects the breadth of activity across our expanded late-stage pipeline as well as the planned manufacturing expenses for our HDV program. On a cash basis, R&D was approximately 50% of revenues as expected. We expect this level of R&D spend to continue for approximately 2 more quarters. In total, revenues this quarter exceeded expectations, while expenses are on plan.

We also took steps this quarter to improve our capital structure. In September, we repurchased $20 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2029 convertible notes for approximately $62 million in cash, thus further reducing both future dilution and ongoing interest expense. This follows the financing we completed in the second quarter when we issued $690 million of 0 coupon convertible notes due in 2032 and settled 75% of the outstanding 2029 notes.

Together, these transactions have reduced the outstanding balance of our '29 notes by over 80%, while preserving substantial financial flexibility. As of September, cash, cash equivalents and investments were approximately $500 million. Our commercial business continues to scale, and our balance sheet gives us the resources to support our upcoming launches and late-stage clinical programs. With that, I'll turn the call back to Chris.

Christopher Peetz

Thanks, Eric. We're keeping stock of where we are today, Mirum is at a strong inflection point. Commercial business continues to outperform, driving an increase in our full year guidance. We launched Atebrioz as a fourth commercial medicine and including the Atebrioz supplemental NDA for younger patients, we have 5 upcoming approval opportunities to further accelerate the commercial business.

The strong performance commercially paired with our pipeline advancements positions us to be cash flow positive next year. As we wrap up our prepared remarks, I want to direct attention again to the upcoming Brelovitug datasets being presented at AASLD this weekend. With data maturity now out to 2 years from the early program, we'll be able to share more of a complete picture of what Brelovitug can achieve for patients with hepatitis delta.

And as we approach our eighth anniversary, I'm incredibly proud of what this team has built, but even more excited about what's ahead as we enter a unique period of commercial growth, multiple launch opportunities and strong financial performance. And finally, as always, I want to thank the entire Mirum team for their exceptional execution and the patients, families and physicians whose partnership keeps us focused on what matters most. We have a lot to look forward to. With that, operator, please open the call for questions.

Operator

Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Josh Schimmer with Cantor Fitzgerald.

質疑応答

Joshua Schimmer

Just a couple of quick ones. First, were there any Takeda purchases of LIVMARLI this quarter or expected in the next quarter as part of the revised guidance? And then second, for the CHENODAL and the CHOLBAM CTEXLI -- CTEXLI franchise, at least combined, you're starting to get to levels that I think historically, you've suggested might attract generic interest or competition, not necessarily breaking out the relative contribution of each, but how should you -- how should we be thinking about modeling the exclusivity of that franchise?

Christopher Peetz

First, I can hit on the bile acid franchise. And we are really excited with how these have grown. Just as a quick reminder on the backdrop on exclusivity. For CHOLBAM that is now is beyond its orphan exclusivity time period. But CTEXLI does have orphan protection. They're both contributors here. And for both of them, we actually -- we've not seen an entrant. That's really all we have visibility to at this point to speak to. So you can see the trends we're seeing for the near term in any case to roll forward. And I'll ask Eric to maybe speak to Takeda dynamics.

Eric Bjerkholt

Yes. So we had very minimal revenues from Takeda this past quarter, and we don't really expect any new orders in Q4.

Operator

Your next question is from Kalpit Patel with Wolfe Research. Your next question is from Brian Skorney with Baird.

Luke Herrmann

Could you provide a little more color on the -- your confidence in the timing of the planned PSC submission? What's the next regulatory touchstone we should be looking for here? This is Luke, by the way.

Christopher Peetz

On the PSC situation, for the time being, really nothing changed in what we're -- what we can speak to and the status of the program. Strategy is underway. And as we spoke about previously, multiple different touch points as we work towards a potential submission in the first half of next year. I think we're really confident in the datasets. Rob called out some of the abstracts at AASLD that touched on IBD safety, for example, some of that work coming out of our prep for that NDA submission. So just kind of come back to -- we feel really confident in our guidance to submit an NDA in the first half of next year. Beyond that, no material updates to what we've seen or heard.

Luke Herrmann

Great. And then on Atebrioz, I guess, has there been any difference in the early launch experience thus far as compared to your expectations going into it?

Christopher Peetz

It's early days. I'll hand over to Peter to give some color.

Peter Radovich

Yes, Luke, as Chris mentioned, early days, just launched in October, so we're a couple of weeks in, but really positive feedback from patients, caregivers, physicians, I think high receptivity to the value proposition we see with Atebrioz. So we're really excited, but obviously, early days to get any more detail than that.

Operator

Your next question is from Gavin Clark-Gartner with Evercore ISI.

Yesha Patel

This is Yesha on for Gavin. We were just wondering if ahead of the Q1 VANTAGE readout for PBC, there were any blinded baseline or trial conduct metrics you're expecting to share, in particular, maybe like baseline itch severity, background therapies, discontinuation rates, anything along that realm?

Christopher Peetz

I think maybe Rob can speak to a little bit of the trial design, but probably not too much on the actual data to speak to at this point.

Rob Myers

Yes. Really not much to report at this point. I mean we're still tracking towards reporting the data in the first quarter of next year. I think premature to talk about baseline characteristics and aspect of study conduct at this point.

Operator

Your next question is from Kalpit Patel with Wolfe Research.

Kalpit Patel

Two from us. For the guidance raise, is most of that related to the adult PFIC patients that are growing for LIVMARLI? Or are there other areas that are contributing to that growth? And then for the second question, for the PSC IBD subgroup data that you'll be presenting, can you comment if those data have been submitted previously to the FDA? Or are these new analysis that need to be set?

Christopher Peetz

I mean I can just touch on the PSC one briefly and then hand the guidance question over to Peter. I mean these are new analyses. So kind of more detailed review of data that FDA had not seen previously.

Peter Radovich

Yes. Kalpit, on the guidance question, we do see strength across the portfolio, continued growth in Alagille syndrome, bile acid products doing very well. But adult PFIC is the biggest driver. And we have line of sight now after several quarters of this cadence of $10 million to $15 million quarter-on-quarter step-up for that to persist through this year and through next year as well.

Operator

Your next question is from Ryan Deschner with Raymond James.

Ryan Deschner

Congrats on the quarter. I'm curious on sort of your expectations for the relative launch trajectory for Atebrioz. And if you expect at least early on, any sort of -- any signs of a bolus kind of coming in for that to sort of slow down later on in the early launch. Just curious on your thoughts there.

Christopher Peetz

I'll let Peter speak to that and probably even speak to the kind of broader portfolio as we roll into next year.

Peter Radovich

Yes. The Atebrioz early adoption and inbound interest has been really really strong, and we're excited about that. I think if I were to compare the Atebrioz launch trajectory and adoption curve to LIVMARLI, probably will be faster. I think you take LIVMARLI, we're in Alagille syndrome. It's been about 5 years since the original FDA approval and about 50% of addressable patients with Alagille syndrome have gone on LIVMARLI, and we're still seeing growth quarter-over-quarter. And I think if you were to think about that as a comparator, we would expect Atebrioz to be faster adoption dynamics at this point.

Christopher Peetz

The one thing I'd add on is, as you look at Q4 and even into next year, the cadence of growth we've seen for total revenue in this kind of $10 million to $15 million a quarter, we fully expect that to continue throughout next year.

Operator

Your next question is from James Condlis with Stifel.

James Condulis

And maybe just one on PSC, and I appreciate there's only so much you could say. But I think you've mentioned in the past that in the discussion with the FDA, there was nothing really new you felt was new that wasn't in the original VISTAS study. And just curious if that's still the case from your perspective? And then just like in general, do you expect there to be a sort of formal alignment here kind of ahead of filing? Or is it just sort of TBD in terms of how the discussion evolves?

Christopher Peetz

Overall, because of the situation we're seeking multiple different interaction points, multiple meetings, we're not providing kind of meeting-by-meeting updates. So really, what I can say is we're pointing towards that first half NDA -- and kind of remind on the goal here is given that the dataset is so robust and there's a lot to review, the goal of the interactions we're having is to get more familiarity with the data set before submission, not necessarily, in all cases, complete alignment.

Operator

Your next question is from Jessica Fye with JPMorgan.

Jessica Fye

I was looking at the press release, and it looks like there is a lot of regulatory submissions going in, in the first half of 2027. And I was curious if you could just speak to kind of the organizational bandwidth to bring in additional assets via business development during what seems like a really busy time. Basically, should we expect a little breather on the BD side in the near term while you get all these things into the FDA?

Christopher Peetz

Yes, it is a very busy first half of the year for submissions. You're absolutely spot on with that. We've done a lot -- we saw this coming. So we've done a lot to organize for it, and we're in really good shape from a team standpoint on having these efforts staffed and expect that we'll be able to manage through it without issue. In terms of what it means for BD? We continue to be opportunistic. So if the right opportunity comes, we want to be able to pursue it. However, more of an earlier clinical stage opportunity would be a little easier to add in at this point. But that doesn't mean we're not continuing to have an opportunistic lens on all opportunities.

Jessica Fye

Does that include commercial stage?

Christopher Peetz

Yes, absolutely. I mean I'd pass it over to Peter to kind of talk about our lens on, again, more broadly on BD scope and targets that we like.

Peter Radovich

Yes. I mean, as Chris mentioned, I think our philosophy is you always have to be active and we look clinical stage through commercial stage. We think about rare disease as a capability in the therapeutic area in and of itself have the know-how to be successful with rare disease medicines, whether it's development, regulatory, patient finding, patient access. We feel really good about the capabilities we've built there and kind of look broadly for underappreciated rare disease assets where we think we could potentially add value.

Operator

Your next question is from Yigal Nochomovitz from Citi.

Yigal Nochomovitz

Congrats on the strong quarter. I just want to switch topics on to HDV and the AZURE-4 readout. Obviously, that's a second Phase III trial, which is good. But can you just speak to what additional nuances or additional learnings you might glean from AZURE-4 to further drive the strength of the BLA? And then with regard to the HDV market, could you just talk to what you're watching for in terms of HDV diagnosis rates potentially expanding as you get closer to a launch?

Christopher Peetz

I'll ask Rob to maybe recap some of the A ZUR4 design and rationale and then let Peter speak to the market question.

Rob Myers

Yes. AZURE-4 is an important part of the registrational package for Brelovitug in the U.S. And just as a reminder, it's designed very similarly to AZURE-1, with the exception of patients in the late treatment arm crossing over 12 weeks instead of 24 weeks. And in terms of our expectations, of course, we expect to see complementarity in -- or consistency in the neurologic responses and ALT normalization as well as safety to that which we observed in AZURE-1.

Peter Radovich

Then in terms of the question on HDV diagnosis rates and kind of how we see this undeveloped market developing over time. We actually have a small team that's pretty active now doing disease state education and awareness with the providers across the country who manage hepatis B patients and in areas where they likely have undiagnosed delta patients as well. And I think one of the things we've learned as we've been out in the field is there's really been very little testing to date. There's papers that show single-digit percentages of -- low single-digit percentages of hep B patients have ever received a delta test.

So I think one of the big pushbacks from providers historically has been lack of therapies for this condition. And I think we're seeing that change now and look to see increased interest in testing over time and excited about the early trends we're seeing.

Operator

Your next question is from Mike Ulz with Morgan Stanley.

Michael Ulz

Congratulations on the strong quarter as well. Maybe just a follow-up on volixibat and the upcoming VANTAGE data next quarter. Can you just remind us what the bar is on pruritus and then what you think is sort of a meaningful benefit there?

Christopher Peetz

I can make a couple of observations and ask Rob to maybe speak to expectations. I think the one thing that I'd point towards is for the study, we have the interim readout. So we kind of -- we know what's possible for volixibat really substantial improvements versus placebo over a 2-point placebo-adjusted difference. That is really compelling and competitive if we're anywhere in the ballpark of what we saw in the interim. And I don't know, Rob, do you have anything to add on to that?

Rob Myers

Yes. Just that the interim data were quite compelling. As mentioned, we see over a 2-point placebo-adjusted improvement in the volixibat arms. We've done a bit of work to validate the adult ItchRO to show that this magnitude of reduction is actually clinically important. And so we feel very confident going into the readout next quarter.

Operator

Your next question is from Lisa Walter with RBC Capital Markets.

Lisa Walter

Congrats on the quarter. Maybe just given the recent challenges with the FDA and PSC, just curious if the same group of regulators will also be reviewing your filings for biliary atresia as part of the EXPAND study as well as a potential filing for PBC. And if so, what gives you confidence that the FDA will understand those rare diseases a little bit better and your trial designs better versus what we have seen for PSC? Any color here would be helpful.

Christopher Peetz

From a simple standpoint, these are all with the liver division. However, knowing who is assigned to the review is something we don't have visibility to at this point in time. What I would say is for VANTAGE and for expand, really clear dialogue along the way on study design, all of the choices we made in those studies and some of it quite recent interactions. So I do feel confident in our position heading into those submissions.

And the one thing I'd add on is what the contrast of that to PSC is that interactions with PSC were really mostly in 2019, 2020, so a bit more distant just from a time standpoint.

Operator

Your next question is from Joe Schwartz with Leerink Partners.

Joseph Schwartz

Can you talk about what we should watch for at AASLD for Brelovitug in terms of the full AZURE-1 presentation, what our focus should be? And will any updates from the Phase II trials be presented to? And then we noticed that the Brelovitug BLA is now described as subject to supportive AZURE-4 results. Is that new caution or just standard language? And can you talk about what counts is supportive? And given that AZURE-4s control group waits only 12 weeks, would you file on AZURE-1 plus the Phase IIb data if AZURE-4 were more mixed?

Christopher Peetz

On that last point, there's nothing new here. So AZURE-1 and 4 have always been the proposed Phase III package for Brelovitug. And the simple way to think of it is the study was designed with the FDA before orphan designation was granted. So they were looking for 2 pivotals. Really nothing different from patient population overall dynamics here that would suggest a big difference between the 2. It's just about having 2 pivotals. Now we do have orphan designation. So hindsight, hard to say how that would have been treated, but that's the case and has always been the plan for submission. And I'll ask Rob to maybe give the highlights and directions for AASLD.

Rob Myers

Yes. We have some exciting data on Brelovitug at AASLD. As you mentioned, we'll present the AZURE-1 results in full 24-week data, Phase III data and as well the 48-week Phase IIb component of. And then lastly, we have an abstract on patients with cirrhosis from the original Phase II study who've been treated out to 2 years. And really, that entire data package, it's really robust. I mean it tells us that we do see excellent rates of virologic suppression and ALT normalization as early as week 24, that with prolonged treatment, greater virologic suppression, greater rates of ALT normalization, including in patients with advanced disease cirrhosis. And quite significantly elevated ALT. So I think the Brelovitug package is quite strong. Looking forward to our AZURE-4 data by the end of this year.

Operator

Your next question is from Jon Wolleben with Citizens JMP.

Jonathan Wolleben

I was hoping to get some more color on how you guys are thinking about your peak sales guidance in HDV and then PBC, PSC. Just given the relative prevalence and moving dynamics in those markets, what's underlying that $1 billion? Or is that just a simple guidepost to think of as a starting point? Just wondering how granular you guys have gotten internally there?

Christopher Peetz

The one thing I'd say is overall meant to be an approach on how we give these on giving kind of greater than a certain target, important lens to put on it as you're thinking about it, but Peter can speak a little bit to some of the color on how we came to these numbers.

Peter Radovich

Yes. So I think in delta the guidance of greater than $1 billion, there's a lot of ways to get there, quite frankly. I mean, even if you just look at the U.S. market today, about 15,000 patients diagnosed with insurance under management, you don't only really need to get a few thousand of those on therapy chronically to get towards that greater than $1 billion guidance. Obviously, we know this is an underdiagnosed disease.

And as we commented, very low rates of testing have happened historically in the U.S. And not to mention, there's a substantial international opportunity for Brelovitug as well. So I think I'd say the theme there, a lot of ways to get to greater than $1 billion. And as you move over to vol, PSC, PBC, similar addressable patient population in the U.S. for PSC, about 20,000 patients with PSC and pruritus, no competition there. And then PBC, a larger addressable market with about 50,000 addressable patients in the U.S., but a bit more competition. But I think you could kind of do the math in a number of different ways to get to the kind of numbers you need to get to, to get to the greater...

Operator

Your next question is from Charles Wallace with H.C. Wainwright.

Charles Wallace

This is Charles on for RK. So for my first question, I was wondering how should we think about the R&D spend going forward in fourth quarter and then also 2027 with the placebo-controlled portion of AZURE-1 and 4 studies completing. I'll come back with my second question.

Christopher Peetz

Speak to some of those trends?

Eric Bjerkholt

Yes. So we like to measure it both in absolute terms and also as a percent of revenue. And as I alluded to in my comments, the past couple of quarters we have been around 50% of revenue. We think that's going to continue at about that pace for 2 more quarters and then subsequently decrease rapidly, I think, to 10% of revenue. That should be true long term as well.

Charles Wallace

And then for my second question, beyond the AZURE-4 results, what additional items remain before you can file the BLA in the first half for Brelovitug?

Christopher Peetz

For Brelovitug, it really just comes down to pulling together the submission. So all of the work streams from both the clinical studies and the CMC submission all tracking towards being ready first half. So all that's a lot of document prep and write-up that's left to do.

Operator

Your next question is from Joseph Thome with TD Cowen.

Joseph Thome

Maybe another one on HDV. We may have several agents approved for HDV, I guess, currently or over the next couple of years here. What do you see as sort of the main differentiating features of Breobitug based on the data you have in hand that will drive adoption of Breobitug over some of these others?

And then second, when we think about the potential cadence of BA coming online for LIVMARLI, obviously, the FDA just kind of ask you to do this based on request. Is there a pocket of patients ready to come on therapy rapidly? Or will it be gradual? Kind of how should we think about the cadence of that launch?

Christopher Peetz

I'll make a couple of observations on HDV and let Peter add to it and speak to BA as well. But the one thing I'd say is when we put together the transaction with Bluejay around Brelovitug, what we found really exciting about this program is that you had a fully human antibody that was a single treatment that could drive continued improvement over time to some really impressive response rates, both on normalizing liver inflammation and on controlling and lowering viral levels. A lot of that data is what we're looking forward to sharing this weekend at AASLD to show updates on what that can get to at 2 years. That kind of gives the answer to how we think about our positioning with HDV. Pass over to Peter to touch up and add the BA comments.

Peter Radovich

I think it's very well stated on HDV. And on the BA question, these patients are at the same centers, the pediatric liver docs that prescribe LIVMARLI today for pediatric PFIC and Alagille patients. So it's -- the patients are there. As you noted in your kibbenkkquestion, the study was really started as a response to inbound interest from clinicians to use the product in this way. So it's a pretty captive audience who we're very familiar with the product who have these patients in our clinic under management now.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Chris Peetz, CEO, for closing remarks.

Christopher Peetz

Great. Thanks, everyone, for joining today's call. Looking forward to a strong end of the year and a busy 2027. Good afternoon, everyone.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you so much for attending. You may now disconnect.