CNXリソース (CNX) 2026年第3四半期決算説明会:生産維持とユーティカ戦略
CNXリソーシズの2026年第3四半期決算説明会では、強力なヘッジを活用した維持生産モードの継続が表明された。経営陣は2027年の公式ガイダンスを見送りつつ、低価格期における小規模な減産実施や、軽油・鋼材のインフレ影響が資本計画の1%未満にとどまる見通しを示した。また、自社株買いを資本配分の基準とし、2020年代末に向けたペンシルベニア州中部のユーティカ開発への移行方針を強調した。リスク要因として、域内ガス価格の下落や需要不確実性が挙げられている。
CNXリソーシズ(NYSE: CNX)は、2026年第3四半期決算説明会において、生産規律の維持、自社株買い、およびペンシルベニア州中部ユーティカ(Utica)開発に向けた長期的な移行を強調しました。経営陣は2027年の公式ガイダンスを示さなかったものの、現時点では維持生産モード(現状維持の生産体制)にとどまる見込みであると説明しました。
主なポイント
- CNXの2027年に向けた現在の計画は、維持生産を前提としています。経営陣によると、2027年に向けて十分なヘッジが施されており、市場環境が悪化した場合でも事業活動を調整する方針です。
- 経営陣は、在庫水準が過去5年の平均値付近にあり、冬場に向けて4 T(兆立方フィート)に接近する可能性があると述べました。追加増産を行うには、先物価格のさらなる上昇が必要になると示唆しました。
- CNXのポートフォリオのおよそ3分の2はアパラチア域内価格に連動しています。地元のガス価格が1ドルを下回った際、同社は一部の生産量を抑制(減産)しましたが、第3四半期の総減産量は「1 B(10億立方フィート)未満」と説明されました。
- 自社株買いは、M&Aやその他の資本配分オプションを評価する際の基準(ハードルレート)であり続けています。経営陣は、自社株買いについて、総生産量を増やすことなく1株当たりの生産量およびフリーキャッシュフローを拡大する手段とみなしています。
- CNXは、ペンシルベニア州南西部のマーセラス(Marcellus)開発を今後4〜5年継続し、2020年代末頃にペンシルベニア州中部のユーティカおよびマーセラス中心の開発体制へ移行する見込みです。
- 軽油および鋼材価格の上昇が同社の資本計画に与える影響は1%未満にとどまる見通しです。これは、電動フラッキング(水圧破砕)車隊の導入や水輸送トラックへの依存度低減に支えられています。
事業および業績ハイライト
| 指標 | 2026年第3四半期決算説明会での開示事項 | 経営陣のコメント |
|---|---|---|
| 域内価格へのエクスポージャー | ポートフォリオのおよそ3分の2 | 天候に起因する需要の伸び悩みと地元価格の軟調さが価格差(ディファレンシャル)を圧迫 |
| 第3四半期の生産抑制(減産)量 | 「1 B(10億立方フィート)未満」 | 域内ガス価格が1ドルを下回った期間に減産を実施 |
| インフレの影響 | 資本計画の1%未満 | コスト上昇は主に軽油と鋼材に集中 |
| ペンシルベニア州中部のインフラ投資 | 年間でおよそ2,500万ドル前後 | 経営陣はインフラ支出の大幅な急増を予想していない |
| オールイン資本効率目標 | 0.85〜0.90ドルの範囲 | インフラおよび掘削・仕上げ投資を含み、インフレや年間のインフラニーズに応じて変動 |
| ペンシルベニア州南西部マーセラスの開発期間(ランウェイ) | 4〜5年 | 開発はほぼ2020年代末まで継続する見込み |
CNXは、ペンシルベニア州南西部のマーセラスが短期的に最も採算性の高い開発地域であり続けていると述べました。その理由は、すでにインフラが整っており、既存のロケーションへの再アプローチを行うプロジェクトが多いからです。
開発構成(開発ミックス)には、大深度ユーティカ井が徐々に組み込まれる見込みです。2020年代末頃には、ペンシルベニア州中部のユーティカを中心に、ペンシルベニア州中部のマーセラスを補完的に加えた開発体制へとシフトする予定です。ペンシルベニア州南西部のユーティカおよびその他の地層については、その後の開発が検討される可能性があります。
経営陣は、ユーティカでの掘削日数の短縮が今後残された最大のコスト削減機会であると特定しました。また、明確な井戸数は示さなかったものの、2027年の開発構成は、大深度ユーティカでの活動とペンシルベニア州南西部の残存インベントリ(未開発鉱区)を組み合わせた現在のプログラムとおおむね同規模になると述べました。
業績予想・見通し(ガイダンス)
CNXは2027年の公式ガイダンスを提供しませんでした。現在の状況に基づき、経営陣は自社のヘッジポジションが多くの競合他社よりも強力な保護となっているため、現状維持の生産体制を保つ姿勢であると説明しました。
長期の天然ガスフォワード価格が追加供給を正当化できるほど上昇した場合には、増産を検討するとしています。一方、価格がさらに軟化した場合は、必要な調整を行うと経営陣は述べています。
CNXは、今後5年間に見込まれるプロジェクトに向け、潜在顧客との直接ガス販売交渉に参加しています。しかし、固定引き渡し義務を正当化するには長期契約に十分なプレミアムが不可欠であると説明し、合意に向けたスケジュールは開示しませんでした。
リスクと注目点
- 域内ガス価格は一時的に1ドルを下回り、およそ0.50〜0.60ドルまで落ち込んだため、ヘッジされていない生産量を抑制するインセンティブが生じました。
- 全生産量の約3分の2がアパラチア域内価格に左右されるため、地元の天候、需要、輸送コストの経済性が実現価格差(ディファレンシャル)に影響を与える可能性があります。
- 軽油や鋼材のコストが上昇していますが、経営陣は現時点で設備投資全体への影響は限られると見込んでいます。
- アパラチア地域における長期的なガス需要には不確実性が残っており、特にAI関連などのプロジェクトに伴う需要の規模と時期が注目されます。
- 大口顧客との直接契約の経済性は、長期引き渡し義務に対する十分なプレミアムが得られるかどうかにかかっています。
- 資本効率は、インフレ動向や各年に必要なインフラ整備の規模に対して引き続き敏感です。
アナリスト質疑応答のハイライト
資本配分:経営陣は、1株当たりの長期フリーキャッシュフローを増加させるM&Aに対して引き続き前向きであると述べました。ただし、自社株買いが潜在的な取引に対するハードルレートを設定し続けています。同社は将来の融資枠(リボルバー)の利用や短期的な買戻し戦略についての詳細は提供しませんでした。
天然ガス需要:CNXはアパラチア地域の長期需要について強気ですが、その機会の定量化は控えました。経営陣は、生産量の増加は需要予測のみならず、供給曲線からの価格シグナルに引き続き連動すると述べました。
ガスディファレンシャル:経営陣は当四半期の厳しい域内環境の原因を天候と価格の軟調さによるものとしました。MichConやその他の市場への輸送が採算に合わなかったため、一部の量は域内に留まりました。
経営陣の移行:アラン・シェパード氏は、CNXが社内候補者のラヴィ・スリヴァスタヴァ氏をCFOに任用したことを喜ばしく思っていると述べました。同氏はエバレット氏の退任について、同社の8-K提出書類以上の詳細情報を提供しませんでした。
アパラチア地域の統合:CNXは他の事業者が発表した取引についてのコメントを控えました。経営陣は、買収は資本配分の選択肢の1つに過ぎず、1株当たりの価値創造において自社株買いと競合しなければならないことを再強調しました。
決算説明会(電話会議)全文文字起こし
決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト
経営陣による説明
Operator
Good day, and welcome to the CNX Resources Third Quarter 2026 Q&A Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]
Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Tyler Lewis. Please go ahead.
Tyler Lewis
Thank you, and good morning, everybody. Welcome to CNX's Third Quarter Q&A Conference Call. Today, we will be answering questions related to our third quarter results. This morning, we posted to our Investor Relations website an updated slide presentation and detailed third quarter earnings release data such as quarterly E&P data, financial statements and non-GAAP reconciliations, which can be found in a document titled 3Q 2026 Earnings Results and Supplemental Information of CNX Resources.
Also, we posted to our Investor Relations website our prepared remarks for the quarter, which we hope everyone had a chance to read before the call, as the call today will be used exclusively for Q&A. With me today for Q&A are Alan Shepard, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Ravi Srivastava, our Chief Financial Officer; and Navneet Behl, our Chief Operating Officer. Please note that the company's remarks made during this call, including answers to questions, include forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors. A discussion of risks and uncertainties related to those factors in CNX's business is contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the release issued today. With that, thank you for joining us this morning.
And operator, can you please open the call up for Q&A at this time.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Gabriel Daoud with Truist.
質疑応答
Gabe Daoud
I was hoping we could maybe just start with the macro backdrop. And you noted in the prepared remarks, you'll certainly remain flexible and responsive to the current environment. So curious maybe how that would kind of translate into your thoughts on '27, just given where gas prices are?
Alan Shepard
Yes. Hey, Gabe, thanks for the question. Where we sit right now, so we're pretty much on the 5-year average for storage levels. We'll be close to 4 Ts going into winter. Right now, we're not giving forward guidance, but right now, it looks like we'll be in maintenance production mode, right? Like unless we see something that sort of incentivizes producers to bring on more gas, we'll be staying steady state. And obviously, if it sort of degrades from here, we'll make adjustments as necessary.
Gabe Daoud
Okay. Thanks, Alan. Okay. So maintenance for now, like not below maintenance given prices on the screen currently. You feel good with still maintenance.
Alan Shepard
Yes. We're pretty hedged going into '27. So we're in a little bit different shape than most folks. So right now, we'd still be in the maintenance mode mindset.
Gabe Daoud
Right. Right. Okay. Okay. Great. That's helpful. And then my follow-up would be another, I guess, high-level question, a big merger in basin this week was announced, as I'm sure you're all aware. Would love to hear your thoughts maybe on the transaction and just M&A in Appalachia more generally.
Alan Shepard
Yes. I want to comment on other folks' M&A. Obviously, it's a commodity industry and you see consolidation in those sorts of industries. We'll see what the sort of the combined company does in terms of production levels and things like that, but not much color to provide from our side on it.
Gabe Daoud
Okay. And just CNX's appetite for M&A at this stage?
Alan Shepard
Yes. So it's one of the lanes of capital allocation, right, as we always talk about, we're open to things that are accretive to the long-term free cash flow per share value. But it's just one of the things we review. And right now, share repurchases are sort of the bar we test all of that against, and they continue to be extremely attractive as you saw this quarter.
Operator
And the next question comes from Leo Mariani with ROTH.
Leo Mariani
I wanted to see if you could comment on inflation. Are you starting to see that creep in, in areas of the business? And do you expect that to maybe get a little worse next year?
Alan Shepard
I'll turn that over to Nav.
Navneet Behl
Yes, on the inflation side, the cost increase we are seeing are on two things. One is diesel and other is steel. But our overall impact to our program is less than 1% of our capital. So not much impact moving forward for us.
Alan Shepard
Yes. Leo, if you think about it, we've driven most of the diesel out of our system through sort of our emission reduction initiatives over the years. We run electric frac fleets. We have intensive sort of in-water transportation, right? We don't run a lot of water trucks and things like that. So as Nat mentioned, our exposure to those 2 categories are pretty limited moving into '27, but there are certainly increases there as everyone is.
Leo Mariani
Okay. Appreciate that. And then just a question on sort of the Utica here. I know you haven't had some recent wells. But as you look out a handful of years, certainly my understanding that you guys are going to continue to kind of do more in the Utica. As you think about that, are you contemplating any kind of new midstream build-out you think might be necessary to kind of get some of that deeper Utica in Central Pennsylvania online several years down the road?
Alan Shepard
Yes. As we sort of move through that CPA field, right, we're going to develop that as efficiently as possible, right? We've had a lot of time to sort of plan out the runway there. You're not going to see any major spikes in sort of infrastructure build. Year-to-year, you'll see some oscillation, but really, call it, in the $25 million plus or minus range on infrastructure.
Operator
The next question comes from Phil Jungwirth.
Phillip Jungwirth
Previously, you talked about 40,000 to 50,000 Southwest PA Marcellus acres remaining to be developed. I guess just wondering how you expect the transition activity in coming years. Is the focus going to be predominantly in this area through the decade? Or are we going to see a more gradual pivot, which would actually extend years of inventory in the core?
Alan Shepard
Yes. Obviously, the developing what's remaining in the Southwest PA area on the Marcellus front is the most sort of economic thing to do, right? The infrastructure is all there and they're mostly return trips and things like that. As we talked about before, the way to think about it is we sort of exit the Southwest PA Marcellus as we kind of exit the decade, right?
So there's another 4 to 5 years sort of develop the rest of that. And then the program shifts over to CPA Utica predominantly with CPA Marcellus as we call that area. And then ultimately, you would return back to Southwest PA for Southwest PA Utica and other horizons later on down the road.
Phillip Jungwirth
Okay. Great. And then can you remind us on maintenance CapEx for CNX and maybe a little bit more theoretical because there's still the potential to drive down costs. But if you did shift to predominantly deep Utica position in Central PA, how do you expect total spend to trend relative to this year's more Southwest PA focused program?
Alan Shepard
Yes. So the way we think about it sort of a capital efficiency metric, so all in with the capital infrastructure and the D&C, you're calling that $0.85 to $0.90 range is where we want to be sort of moving forward. Obviously, that's subject to things like inflation and amount of infrastructure in any given year. But the avenue where there's still opportunity to sort of squeeze cost out of the system is really on the drilling days on the Utica side, right? So that's really where our focus is. And every time we go back to a new pad there, that's where we're being intentful.
Operator
And the next question comes from Michael Scialla with Stephens.
Michael Scialla
You had some management change during the quarter. Just wanted to see if you could add any color on Everett's departure and Ravi assuming the role of CFO.
Alan Shepard
Yes. Excited to have Ravi. Great to have an in-house candidate with his sort of background and skill set to sort of step in the role. I'm not going to add anything additional on sort of the Everett departure outside what was in the 8-Ks.
Michael Scialla
Okay. Fair enough. I guess thinking long term, been some pretty robust natural gas demand forecast out there. I guess I want to see your thoughts on do you agree with those? And if they play out, how would CNX respond? Would you do anything different than the way the company has been operating in the last really 6 years with aggressively buying back shares?
Alan Shepard
Yes. I would say we're extremely bullish on sort of long-term demand in basin. In terms of giving you a precise number, whether that's 2 Bs or 20 Bs, time will tell, right? I mean there's still a lot of uncertainty on the ultimate end users in terms of AI and things like that. But what's clear is natural gas, every drop here in Appalachia is going to get developed.
From a pricing perspective, what that means is we're still going to be constrained by the supply curve. This is the way we sort of think about it. So when we see the longer-term strip increasing in pricing to sort of bring a call on what we have, that's when we'll bring incremental volumes to the market until then sort of maintenance of production the way we think about it.
Operator
And the next question comes from Betty Jiang with Barclays.
Wei Jiang
First on the gas differential, like 3Q differential is a bit wider than where we were -- where we were expecting. So just wondering if there's anything in particular that impacted this? And could you remind us what's your in-basin exposure?
Alan Shepard
Yes. I mean our in-basin exposure is 2/3, 2/3 of the whole portfolio, right? Been challenging up here in basin with sort of the weather and the softness. Any given day, our team is out there optimizing. We have different sales points, but a lot of the volumes ended up just staying here because it wasn't economic to sort of send to MichCon or other places.
Wei Jiang
Got it. And then just you guys don't subscribe to the curtailment strategy, right? Was there any curtailment impact?
Alan Shepard
Yes. No, great question, Betty. So there's been some periods over the last couple of months where gas has dropped sub-$1 because we hedge, there's not a lot we need to do in terms of shut-ins, but there's been some couple of stretches where we have curtailed volumes. It's been less than a B though, probably for the whole quarter. So we haven't sort of spiked that out. But we definitely are sensitive as other folks when you get down to $0.50, $0.60 gas in basin, there's no reason for anybody to sort of reach that level if you're unhedged.
Wei Jiang
Right. No, that makes sense. And then another question on capital allocation. It's the second quarter in a row now that you lean on the balance sheet a bit for a pretty outsized buyback. Is that a level that -- something that you will consider -- continue to do? And is there a limit on how much willingness you're willing to maybe draw on the balance sheet on the revolver?
Alan Shepard
Yes. We generally don't try to give too much color on the short-term tactics from the buyback program because that's not sort of in our interest. But I think if you can look back at the history of what we've done, we sort of stepped on the gas when see the sort of sector trade-off and we laid off when the sector is a little more bid to it.
But longer term, we still view every share we repurchase as a sort of great opportunity to create long-term per share value, particularly when we think about the question about long-term gas demand, right? Like instead of growing production, you can grow production per share by repurchasing shares, right? That's another way to do it. So...
Operator
And we have another question from Michael Scialla with Stephens.
Michael Scialla
I just wanted to ask about a lot of companies talking about having conversations and some agreements on direct sales to customers. Are you having any of those kind of conversations with potential customers? And if so, what sort of time frame should we be thinking about? Are these like towards the end of the decade? Or could they be sooner than that?
Alan Shepard
Yes. We're certainly in the mix with everybody else here in the basin on some of these discussions. I mean the challenge has been what's the incentive to like to sell off the long-term contracts if you're not getting sort of enough of a premium to lock into that fixed delivery. So that's been the challenge. No particular time line as folks come to market and look for gas for these projects that are coming online over the next 5 years, we'll participate and we'll update if there's something meaningful to update on it.
Michael Scialla
Got you. And then you mentioned a little bit about deep Utica. Should we be thinking for '27, similar kind of program as this year, turning in line 7 or so wells? Or could that -- could you flex that up at all? Or do you have plans to do that?
Alan Shepard
Yes. I think the mix sort of looks like this year. I don't want to give you the precise numbers off the top of my head, but the mix is we're blending in deep Utica with the remaining sort of Southwest PA that we've talked about. And any given year, I wouldn't get too engaged in sort of any false precision on the signal there. Like I said, we're super bullish on that horizon, and it's sort of going to be core to the next couple of decades.
Operator
And this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tyler Lewis for any closing comments.
Tyler Lewis
Great. Thank you again for joining us this morning. Please feel free to reach out if anyone has any additional questions. Otherwise, we'll look forward to speaking with everyone again next quarter. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.
この記事の一部はAIによって生成・翻訳され、人間によるレビューを経ています。これは一般的な情報提供の目的でのみ使用されており、投資アドバイスを構成するものではありません。










コメント (0)
$ボタンをクリックし、シンボルを入力して、株式、ETF、またはその他のティッカーシンボルをリンクします。