CBRE 2026年第3四半期決算説明会：コアEPSは28%増

主なポイント

• CBREの2026年第3四半期の売上高は前年同期比13%増、コアEPSは28%増加した。リジリエント（安定成長型）事業とトランザクション（取引型）事業の双方が2桁成長を達成した。
• クリティカル・インフラストラクチャー・サービス部門の売上高は、データセンター・ソリューションに対するハイパースケーラーの需要とピアース（Pearce）社の買収に牽引され、80%急増した。
• 経営陣は、2026年通期のコアEPS見通しを7.80〜7.90ドルに維持した。これは中間点ベースで23%の成長に相当する。
• CBREは、2027年も15%のコアEPS成長に至る道筋を見込み続けている。この見通しには、オネック（Onnec）社による予想貢献額と、追加で実施される見込みのM&Aが含まれている。
• 経営陣は、クリティカル・インフラストラクチャー・サービスの売上高が2027年に45億ドル近くに達し、インフラストラクチャー・サービス全体の売上高は2026年水準を40%以上上回る約70億ドルに達すると見込んでいる。
• 金利の高止まりと高水準のボラティリティが不動産資本市場を圧迫している。CBREは資本市場の取引活動が2026年第4四半期から2027年上半期にかけてほぼ横ばいで推移すると予想している。

主要財務データ

事業および業績の動向

アドバイザリー・サービス部門

アドバイザリー・サービス部門の売上高は11%増加し、セグメント営業利益は16%増加した。

グローバル賃貸仲介売上高は6%増加した。英国に支えられ、EMEAが21%増と力強く牽引した。APACは2%増加し、インドや太平洋地域の好調さが北アジアの軟調さで相殺された。米国の賃貸仲介売上高は4%増加し、物流・産業用不動産が16%増加した一方、オフィスは2%減少した。

経営陣は、米国のオフィス業績について、大型取引の第4四半期への期ずれと前年同期の比較水準が高かったことが要因の一部だと説明した。グローバル賃貸仲介売上高は第4四半期に10%台前半のペースで拡大し、2027年には1桁台半ばから後半の成長率に落ち着くと見込んでいる。

グローバル不動産売買仲介売上高は28%増加した。米国は産業用および商業施設取引が牽引し37%増となった。EMEAは英国の33%増を含めて8%増加し、APACは日本が主導して10%増加した。

モーゲージ組成売上高は1%増加した。プライベート・キャピタルからの2桁成長が、政府系機関による融資の減少により相殺された。長期金利の上昇に伴い、借り手がデット・ファンドや保険会社による変動金利構造を好んだと経営陣は語った。

ビルディング・オペレーションズ＆エクスペリエンス部門

ビルディング・オペレーションズ＆エクスペリエンス部門の売上高は17%増加し、セグメント営業利益は21%増加した。

クリティカル・インフラストラクチャー・サービスの売上高は、ハイパースケーラーの需要とピアース社の買収を反映して80%急増した。ファシリティ・マネジメント売上高は、テクノロジー、金融サービス、エネルギー分野の顧客に支えられ13%増加した。ローカル・ファシリティ・マネジメントは米州で25%以上拡大し、アジア太平洋および西欧でも引き続き好調を維持した。

CBREは年末頃にオネック社の買収を完了する見込みである。オネック社は、マレーシア、北欧、オーストラリアなどの市場において、データセンターのプロジェクトおよびテクニカル・サービスの事業基盤を拡大する。経営陣は同業界が依然として細分化されていると指摘し、米国および国際市場においてさらなる買収機会を見込んでいると述べた。

プロジェクト・マネジメント部門

プロジェクト・マネジメント部門の売上高は3%増加した一方、パススルー（通過型）コストは4%減少した。純売上高ベースでは、同事業は11%成長した。

セグメント営業利益は9%増加した。顧客のデフォルトに関連するAPACでの一時的費用が報告された成長率を6ポイント押し下げた。このプロジェクトの評価損を除いた場合、営業利益の成長率は15%であったと経営陣は述べた。

一部のテクノロジー企業やヘルスケア顧客を含め、企業の不動産設備投資は減速した。しかし、インフラ関連の業務がこの軟調さを十分に相殺した。

リアルエステート・インベストメンツ部門

リアルエステート・インベストメンツ部門の営業利益は、データセンター用地の売却と他の資産のマネタイズ（現金化）に牽引され、前年同期の7,300万ドルから1億6,600万ドルに増加した。

CBREは、データセンター用途として売却できる可能性のある用地を20件以上保有している。経営陣は、これを継続的ではあるが非常に不均等なビジネスと説明しており、そのタイミングはハイパースケーラーの需要、許認可、電力へのアクセスに大きく依存している。

インベストメント・マネジメント部門の営業利益は12%減少した。リカーリング型の資産管理手数料の増加が、共同投資リターンの低下によって相殺された。

経営陣の見通し

CBREは2026年通期のコアEPS見通しを7.80〜7.90ドルに維持した。中間点は23%の成長を意味する。

経営陣は、2027年に15%のコアEPS成長に至る目標を引き続き掲げている。この見通しは、インフラ部門の異例とも言える好調な成長の継続、オネック社からのプラスの貢献、および追加で想定されるM&Aを前提としている。また、不動産資本市場事業の成長減速も織り込んでいる。

2027年について、経営陣はクリティカル・インフラストラクチャー・サービスの売上高が45億ドル近くに達すると見込んでいる。インフラストラクチャー・サービス全体の売上高は、2026年を40%以上上回る約70億ドルに達すると予測されている。開発事業における潜在的なデータセンター用地の売却は、この売上高予測から除外されている。

同社は、通期のフリーキャッシュフロー・コンバージョン率が目標範囲である75%〜85%に収まり、年末の純レバレッジが1倍をわずかに上回ると予想している。

リスクおよび注視すべき点

• 金利上昇と金利の不確実性は、取引価格の再設定、遅延、資産売却に代わる借り換えを引き起こし、投資売買仲介、モーゲージ組成、開発、投資運用全般における取引活動の減速を招いている。
• 経営陣は、資本市場活動が2026年第4四半期および2027年上半期を通じてほぼ横ばいで推移すると予想している。2027年下半期の改善予想は、金利のさらなる安定にかかっている。
• エンタープライズ・ファシリティ・マネジメントにおける2件の大型契約で再構築が必要となっており、同事業の第4四半期業績を圧迫する見込みである。経営陣は、この問題はポートフォリオ全体を代表するものではなく、個別契約固有のものであると述べた。
• 企業の慎重な姿勢が、賃貸仲介および従来の不動産設備投資に影響を与えている。一部のテクノロジー企業の顧客は、支出をデータセンターやその他の重要インフラへと向け直している。
• 負債コストの上昇は、データセンターの新規建設を減速させる可能性がある。経営陣は政治的状況も不確定要素として挙げたが、既存サイトの改修や米国以外の市場では引き続き機会が存在すると見込んでいる。
• データセンター用地の売却益は四半期または年単位での予測が難しく、リアルエステート・インベストメンツ部門の業績に大幅なボラティリティをもたらす可能性がある。

アナリストQ&Aの要点

アナリストはCBREの2027年成長目標の持続可能性に注目した。経営陣は、特にデータセンターやインフラサービスなどのリジリエント事業が資本市場の活動減速を相殺できると述べた。15%のコアEPS成長の道筋にはオネック社が含まれており、追加の買収も前提としている可能性が高い。

M&Aについて、CBREは最低15%のリターンを目標とし、すぐに利益増大（アクレティブ）につながる取引に焦点を当てていると述べた。オネック社がパフォーマンスに基づく対価の満額を獲得した場合、アーンアウトの支払額は10億ドルをわずかに上回る。経営陣は、その金額を達成するには高い成長が必要になると述べた。

CBREは、M&Aが引き続き資本運用の最優先事項であると予想している。自社株買いはオネック社の取引を控えた第3四半期に減速し、買収パイプラインが堅調に推移する間は大幅に減少する見込みである。

また経営陣は、エンタープライズ・ファシリティ・マネジメントの軟調さが、再構築を要する2件の複雑な大型契約に起因するものであると説明した。ローカル・ファシリティ・マネジメント事業は契約構造が異なり、エンジニアリング主導のサービスや小規模なプロジェクト機会から引き続き恩恵を受けている。

決算説明会文字起こし全文

決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト

経営陣による説明

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2026 CBRE Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Chandni Luthra. Thank you. You may begin.

Chandni Luthra

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to CBRE's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Earlier today, we posted a presentation deck on our website that you can use to follow along with our prepared remarks and an Excel file that contains additional supplemental materials. Today's presentation contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning our business outlook, business plans, capital allocation strategy as well as our earnings, net leverage and free cash flow outlook. .

These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and trends to differ materially. For a full discussion of the risks and other factors that may impact these statements, please refer to this morning's earnings release and our other SEC filings. We've provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures discussed on our call to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, together with explanations of these measures in our presentation deck appendix.

Throughout our remarks, when we cite financial performance relative to our expectations, we are referring to actual results against the outlook we provided on our second quarter 2026 earnings call in July, unless otherwise noted. All growth rates we cite are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted. Also, as a reminder, our resilient businesses include facilities management, critical infrastructure services, property management, project management, loan servicing, valuations, other portfolio services and recurring investment management fee. Our transactional businesses are comprised of property sales, leasing, mortgage origination, carried interest and incentive fee in the investment management business and development fees.

I'm joined on today's call by Bob Sulentic, our Chair and CEO; and Emma Giamartino, our Chief Financial Officer. Now please turn to Slide 3 as I turn the call over to Bob.

Robert Sulentic

Thank you, Chandni, and good morning, everyone. CBRE produced another quarter of strong financial results and continued to make strategic gains in targeted areas of our business. Financially, core EPS improved 28% on a 13% revenue increase with both resilient and transactional businesses growing by double digits. Strategically, we continue to advance both our Critical Infrastructure Services business line, which operates as part of the BOE segment as well as the broader infrastructure services work we perform across the company.

As a reminder, our Critical Infrastructure Services business line primarily entails network infrastructure services, MEP projects and facilities management for data centers. Our acquisition of Onnec, which we announced on Tuesday, fits within this line of business. We expect critical infrastructure services to generate nearly $4.5 billion of revenue in 2027. Outside of the Critical Infrastructure Services business line, our infrastructure services work consists primarily of overseeing the construction of transportation and energy assets, along with data centers within Project Management and arranging the sales, leasing and financing of data centers and advisory services.

Taking this work into account, we expect our total infrastructure services revenue to reach nearly $7 billion in 2027, growing more than 40% from this year. Any data center land sales in our development business would be in addition to this revenue. Looking ahead, 2 significant competing dynamics are impacting our business and are offsetting each other. First, we should see continued outsized growth and investment in our infrastructure services businesses. Second, given the interest rate environment, we are expecting downward pressure in our businesses that are driven by the real estate capital markets.

And now I'll turn the call over to Emma.

Emma Giamartino

Thank you, Bob, and good morning, everyone. I will begin by providing detail on our segment results. Overall Advisory Services revenue rose 11%. Global Leasing revenue grew 6% with mixed results across regions. EMEA led leasing revenue with 21% growth where the U.K. was a standout. APAC grew 2% with strength in India and the Pacific, offset by softness in North Asia. In the U.S., leasing revenue rose 4%, supported by industrial up 16%, while office leasing dipped 2%. We have strong pipelines and expect global leasing revenue to grow at a low double-digit rate in the fourth quarter. .

Global property sales revenue increased 28%, led by the U.S., up 37%, driven by accelerated growth in industrial and retail. Outside the U.S., sales revenue grew 8% in EMEA with particularly strong growth in the U.K., up 33% and 10% in Asia Pacific, led by solid growth in Japan. Mortgage origination revenue rose 1% as a double-digit increase from private capital sources was offset by a decline in government agency lending. Private capital activity was driven by debt funds and insurance companies as borrowers preferred floating rate structures in a rising rate environment. The agencies have a hard time competing in a market environment with higher long-term rates.

Advisory SOP grew 16%. Turning to Building Operations and Experience. Revenue increased 17%. Growth continues to be led by Critical Infrastructure Services, where revenue increased 80%. The drivers were strong hyperscaler demand for our data center services solutions as well as contributions from last November's Pearce acquisition. As Bob mentioned, we have agreed to acquire Onnec and expect to close the acquisition around the end of the year. If Onnec were included, the Critical Infrastructure Services business line would have generated approximately at least $3 billion of revenue over the past 12 months.

Facilities Management revenue grew 13%. Enterprise Facilities Management was led by technology, financial services and energy clients, while local facilities management was paced by more than 25% growth in the Americas as well as continued strength in Asia Pacific and Western Europe. BOE SOP grew 21%. In Project Management, revenue grew 3%, while pass-through costs declined 4%. We saw a slowdown in real estate capital spending by corporates. This was significantly offset by strong growth in infrastructure revenue. Project Management SOP grew 9% despite a onetime cost in APAC related to a client default, which lowered the growth rate by 6 percentage points.

In Real Estate Investments, segment operating profit rose to $166 million from $73 million in the prior year quarter. The improved performance was driven by data center land sales as well as the monetization of other assets. We believe the embedded gains in our development portfolio now total about $800 million, adjusting the value for the recent increase in interest rates. Any data center land sales would generate additional profits over and above the $800 million.

In Investment Management, operating profit declined 12% as higher recurring asset management fees were offset by lower co-investment returns. We ended the quarter with more than $155 billion of AUM and raised approximately $2 billion of new capital, up from $1.6 billion in the second quarter. Now I'll turn to free cash flow and capital allocation. Free cash flow totaled $1.8 billion on a trailing 12-month basis. For the full year, we remain on track to achieve free cash flow conversion within our target range of 75% to 85% and expect to end the year with slightly above 1 turn of net leverage.

We continue to prioritize M&A in areas benefiting from secular tailwinds with a particular focus on data centers and infrastructure. You've seen this in the Onnec acquisition. Turning to our outlook. We are maintaining our previously stated 2026 core EPS guidance in the range of $7.80 to $7.90, reflecting 23% growth at the midpoint. As Bob indicated, we are seeing competing dynamics in our business. We expect to see continued outsized growth in our infrastructure businesses. This will be somewhat offset by lower growth in our real estate capital markets-driven businesses. As a result, we continue to see a path to 15% core EPS growth in 2027.

With that, operator, we will open the line for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan.

質疑応答

Anthony Paolone

My first question is with regards to the path to 2027 growth. What do you think most likely gets you there now in comparison to maybe what you thought the components were a few months ago? And can you maybe get into a little bit of the context on what may need to happen or just how at risk is that 15%.

Emma Giamartino

Yes. Thanks, Tony. So as both Bob and I mentioned in our remarks, we are seeing some competing dynamics across our business. Of course, we're seeing pressure on our real estate capital markets business, but that is being offset in a big way by outsized growth in our resilient businesses, notably infrastructure services and data centers. And I want to reiterate a number that we put in our press release around Onnec. Next year in 2027, we're expecting our critical infrastructure services revenue to reach $4.5 billion and our infrastructure revenue to reach $7 billion.

So there's a tremendous amount of growth there. Walking a high level through the segments, starting with the easy segments, BOE and Project Management, we expect them to grow consistently with how they've grown historically. Advisory will moderate somewhat more than what we expected 90 days ago, as you'd expect with slowing capital markets but it will grow next year. And then within REI, our Investment Management business will be roughly flat, and we expect to monetize development assets, including data center land sales, but there is a wide range of outcomes there.

We'll also likely have more M&A. We have a strong pipeline, particularly in the data center space, and we expect to do more in 2027. So if you put that all together, we are confident in our path to 15%. And I do want to say this is a great example of how our business model is working the way we've intended and the way we've shaped it, even in an environment where our capital markets business are slowing, our resilient businesses are able to offset that and deliver double-digit growth.

Anthony Paolone

Got it. And then just my follow-up is on BOE and just the enterprise facilities business there being under a bit of pressure. I guess what's changed? And what are you really seeing there, especially considering how recurring that business seems to be, and it's 3 quarters into the year, I guess, what's changed?

Robert Sulentic

Yes, Tony, what's going on there that's notable is that we have a couple of accounts that are problematic that we've decided to take on and work out and get resolved. That -- and in doing that, it's putting some downward pressure on our earnings, particularly in the fourth quarter in that business. That's happened from time to time over the years. It's a little bit like brokerage recruiting. The market gets frothy, it gets more and more competitive and you end up with some circumstances, you end up with some broker hires or for -- some outsourcing or enterprise accounts that don't have the characteristics you would want.

We have decided to really take that on now and try to change that circumstance going forward. So we're going to in a marketing sense, in particular, in a solutioning sense, we're going to approach it a little differently than we have in the past to try to get that out of our system kind of permanently. We'll never get it totally out of there, but we are to going to be subject to the impact of restructuring a couple of those accounts in the fourth quarter, and that's what you're seeing there.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Sheldon with William Blair.

Stephen Sheldon

First, just on capital markets. Can you just maybe dig into more on what you're seeing out there later in the third quarter and into the last few weeks or kind of early in the fourth quarter. And specifically, are you starting to see any delays or cancellations in transactions. And then maybe tied into last -- I guess, how wide of a range of outcomes could there be for capital markets looking into next year, assuming a somewhat similar environment to the one we're in right now. I guess how are you thinking about that?

Robert Sulentic

Yes, Stephen, this is Bob. I'll comment and then I'll let Emma comment. So we're seeing exactly what you would expect to see. The cap rates have gone up, deals that were under contract are getting retraded, deals that might have otherwise gone under contract aren't happening. We're seeing refinancings in some places that we thought would we'd see sales. All of the stuff you typically see when the capital markets are both uncertain and interest rates go up. Our view is that part of what's going on here isn't just the interest rate situation and what interest rates are, but what the uncertainty around interest rates.

It's our view that, that could settle out in the back half of next year and be helpful. Of course, none of us know what's going to happen. As a result, though, in investment sales, mortgage origination, development, investment management, we're seeing an impact, and that's baked into what Emma described in terms of our outlook for the business for the rest of this year and into next year. And Emma, you may want to add on to that.

Emma Giamartino

Yes. I'll just add that throughout the third quarter, as you'd expect, we saw a slowdown in our Capital Markets business, particularly in September. And going into Q4, we expect Capital Markets overall to be roughly flat and that to extend into, as Bob said, the first half of next year. What we really need is for rates to stabilize. The volatility and the uncertainty is what's driving a pause or a hold or even delaying deals to 2027. And we expect that stability to come in the back half of next year. And then, of course, if that doesn't come or things change, the results will be different.

Stephen Sheldon

Got it. That's really helpful. And then on project management, and I apologize if I missed some detail on this, but I think you called out in the presentation that the growth was tempered by weaker corporate capital spending. Just I guess, any detail on where you're seeing that and kind of maybe timing-wise when that started to slow down a little bit? Just any detail there.

Robert Sulentic

Yes. I think it's been a little slower throughout the year. You have all kinds of things going on. You do have some uncertainty in the economy, which causes corporates to be a little more conservative. You have some -- we have -- we do a lot of work for, as you know, big tech clients that have moved their spending away from kind of traditional legacy real estate type investment into infrastructure, critical infrastructure, data centers, I think you're seeing some of that. We saw I think a little bit of concentration and slowdown in health care. So it was a mixture of things. And I think we weren't that surprised by that. Emma, do you have something you want to add to that?

Emma Giamartino

Yes. I just want to add and reinforce that on a net revenue basis, our project management business grew 11% and our SOP, if you take out that one project that we wrote down was 15% growth. So it is doing what we expect it to do, and we expect that to continue through the year. So all of that growth in infrastructure, which is a very large part of our Project Management business is more than offsetting the slowdown in real estate.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI.

Steve Sakwa

I was wondering if you could just comment a little bit more about the office leasing being down 2%. I don't know maybe -- I mean, you made some comments around region. That seems to be a little bit counter to maybe what we're seeing out of the REIT portfolios just from an activity level. So any color on U.S. office leasing would be great.

Robert Sulentic

Yes. I think, Steve, it is a little counter to broadly what we see going on in leasing. It had a couple of situations for us in Q3. We had some big deals that are going to slip into Q4, which is why we have confidence, in part why we have confidence that we'll see double-digit growth in leasing in Q4.

We also had a pretty tough compare last year. I will say that we're prominent in the bigger markets around the U.S. And I think everybody knows, if you go back to the comments you made on the REITs, if you look at the REITs and their best assets in the biggest markets, we're running out of space to lease, and that's having an impact on the business as well. It's good for the value of those assets, but that's having an impact as well. We think that, as I said, we're going to see double-digit growth in leasing in Q4, and then we think we're going to settle out in the mid- to high single digits next year in leasing.

Steve Sakwa

Great. And maybe just a follow-up on the Onnec's acquisition. Could you maybe just talk about kind of pricing. I think if we did the math right, it was about 9x EBITDA. How are you thinking about pricing? And how did you think about maybe change in pricing given just the overall capital markets environment and how do you size that up?

Robert Sulentic

Yes. Well, I'm going to make some comments on it, and then I'm going to let Emma comment. Emma was more involved in the pricing. So first of all, what Onnec does, they do outside the U.S. in some really important markets in Malaysia, in the Nordics, in Australia, and that rounds out our business, and that is a very valuable business, both to us and to other people that would want to acquire that business because of the position that we've put ourselves in on M&A in general, but specifically on M&A for these smaller data center type businesses, we're able to bring these companies on board, create an environment for them where they could be more successful with us than they could outside of us. And so we make an upfront payment that's reasonable, but then we give them the chance to have a substantial earn-out downstream. I think if they fully achieve their earn-out, the multiple will actually go up a little, but the outcome for us will be spectacular.

And Emma, you may want to comment on that.

Emma Giamartino

Yes. For -- if they earn the entirety of the earn-out, that would be a little over $1 billion. And as Bob said, we use that to incentivize to continue to generate really strong growth. These are businesses that have experienced rapid growth over the past 2 years, just as we've seen in our direct line business. So it's difficult to put a multiple on an upfront earnings number. And so if they earn the earn-out, and we're very confident that they will, we're going to have extraordinary growth in this business. .

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Brendan Lynch with Barclays.

Annabelle Ayer

This is Annabelle on for Brendan. Maybe just a follow-up on Onnec. Are there any capabilities or geographies for critical infrastructure that are kind of still missing? And how much more M&A do you think is needed to fully build out this business?

Robert Sulentic

So Annabelle, we have a good global footprint now. This is something we were really after. We managed a lot of data centers overseas, but we didn't have the project capability built out the way we wanted to have it there, the white space technical services work. This does build that footprint out. But there is a lot of room to go in terms of the magnitude of our business around the world. This is a super fragmented business. .

We've now become very large relative to most players in this segment, but still very small relative to the size of the opportunity. And we do believe there'll be considerable M&A targets, both here in the U.S. and around the world that we can go after to continue to build this business. And we are an attractive home for those companies. We're getting inbound requests to talk to us about people selling their businesses to us. So we think that the kind of the perimeters of the footprint geographically are well built out, but there's a lot of infill to be done.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Jade Rahmani with KBW.

Jade Rahmani

Are you seeing any spillover effects from higher interest rates into other areas of the business beyond Capital Markets? For example, in office leasing, is there any reduction in confidence in other areas such as BOE, enterprise facilities management, any slowdown, any pause. And in Project Management, corporates, any pause on CapEx?

Robert Sulentic

Yes. I think in reality, Jade, it's all impacted by that, right? When companies are nervous about the economic outlook, they're a little more cautious. So it's hard to quantify, but there probably has been some pressure in leasing from that economic uncertainty. For sure, one thing we're anticipating is that there could be some impact on the data center build around the world because of the cost of debt.

If you look at our business, one of the things we really loved about Onnec is that if things slow down here for data centers in the U.S., either because of the interest rate environment or because of the political environment, et cetera, we think the growth is going to accelerate outside the U.S. And Onnec puts us in a great position to take care of that. We think that in data centers, you're going to see potentially some pressure on the amount of new build, which is crazy right now, as everybody knows. There will be a lot of pressure on that and still have it be enormous. And then what's happening, and we're already seeing it is a lot of refit of existing data centers, which a big chunk of our business is in that area now. So you're going to see -- when you have higher interest rates, economic uncertainty, you're going to see impacts all across the business.

Jade Rahmani

And your comments on data center potential slowdown actually addressed a second question I had. Just wanted to ask about the data center land site sales. Just in quantum, could you give any context as to how much is remaining? And in terms of activities, are you replenishing those? Is the plan to have that be a recurring business? Or is there sort of a set pipeline, and once it's monetized, that will be it?

Robert Sulentic

It's a recurring business, Jade, but it is not a ratable business, right? We can't sit here and say so much is going to happen every quarter. We could have 6 or 9 months where nothing happened and then in 1 quarter, we could have a lot happen. It's driven by the underlying demand mostly of hyperscalers, our businesses. We've got more than 20 sites that we have under control that could end up being sold as data center sites. We're active.

We have considerable skill at identifying and entitling and getting power to new sites. So we are in the market looking for new sites. And we think that, that will be an ongoing part of our business. But if you were to ask us to lay out exactly what's going to harvest quarter-by-quarter, or even year-by-year, we wouldn't be able to do that. And that's why when we talk about the profits and the revenues in our infrastructure-related businesses, we separate out data centers and comment that, that's in addition to the revenues that we're highlighting for you. When we talk about the profits embedded in our development business, we give you a number for that and then separate out data centers and suggest it'd be in addition to that. I can't remember over the years anything that we were involved in that had real promise that was also simultaneously more choppy than data center land sales are.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Seth Bergey with Citi.

Seth Bergey

I just wanted to kind of go back to the 2027 outlook and just understand how much of that kind of 15%, the path to 15%, does that include any benefit from Onnec that may not have been kind of in the outlook as of the second quarter call in the future M&A.

Emma Giamartino

Yes. It includes the benefit from Onnec, and it likely includes additional M&A on top of that. .

Seth Bergey

And then I guess just kind of on the additional M&A comment. Is that kind of how do you think about pricing? And should we kind of expect that to be -- what kind of size of the companies are you looking to acquire? Is there a size range or just kind of general comments you can make about what you're looking to underwrite?

Emma Giamartino

I think Onnec is a really good example of the types of deals that we're looking at in terms of size, multiple return. We look at all of our deals and are targeting a strong return at least 15%. And as you've seen with all of our recent deals, they're all highly accretive and immediately accretive. So we're focusing on delivering a strong return. We're creating value over the long term. So I think looking at something like Onnec is a good example. .

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.

Ronald Kamdem

Two quick ones. Just going back to BOE and the enterprise facilities management. Can you just talk about what sort of catalyzed the change in -- that you mentioned with some of the tenants there? Was it rates? Was it something else? And how does that dynamic compare to what's happening with the sort of locals business? Is there any sort of correlations there?

Robert Sulentic

Yes. Ronald, this was 2 specific deals that -- the contracts and what we have to deliver under those contracts just doesn't work the way it's structured now. So we're having to restructure them. That work is underway. It's not indicative of the business more broadly. We are going to learn from it and change some things going forward. But those -- it's -- the thing to know about those contracts relative to the local business, those are very big, very complex contracts. They typically involve assets that are geographically spread maybe around the world, certainly over large geographies within parts of the world, many, many assets, sometimes multiple services, sometimes not. .

Local is very different. It can be a single asset. When it's a single asset, it can be quite big and quite complex or a group of assets within a specific geography. That business is very engineering-led, very small project led. We upsell a small projects. So it's very sales-led. It's not an RFP-driven sale process. It's a proactive driven sale process where we engage in the marketplace. So the characteristics around the way contracts are landed, the complexity of contracts, the work we do subject to those contracts is very different in those 2 businesses.

Ronald Kamdem

Great. That's helpful. And then just a second on just the capital allocation. I think you talked about sort of potential more M&A. How should we think about where you're comfortable running leverage? And does that probably sideline the buybacks from here?

Emma Giamartino

Yes. So we're always continuing to prioritize M&A. You saw that with Onnec. And you saw in Q3 that we did slow down our buyback somewhat in anticipation of this deal. And you should expect that to continue through the fourth quarter. We have a really strong pipeline of deals. I know I always say it's difficult to predict what will convert, but we have a great pipeline, and we do expect some of that to convert in 2027. So you should expect to see repurchases as long as that remains the same, repurchases decline pretty meaningfully. .

Operator

And we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back to CEO, Bob Sulentic, for closing remarks.

Robert Sulentic

Thanks, everyone, for being with us, and we look forward to speaking with you again when we report our full year results.

Operator

Thank you. And this concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.