The SpaceX IPO aims to fund its ambitious Mars colonization by tapping into global liquidity, not traditional private equity. This move will liberate Tesla from serving as Musk's primary capital source, potentially allowing for share buybacks. SpaceX's core businesses—launch services, Starlink, and Starship—are projected for significant growth. Starlink is pivotal for Tesla's autonomous systems, while Starship enables space data centers. This synergy, powered by the IPO, enhances Tesla's AI computing capacity by overcoming ground-based energy and data gravity limitations, offering a light-speed communication advantage. Ultimately, this positions Tesla as an "Interstellar Infrastructure Supplier." Short-term risks include capital diversion to SpaceX and unresolved technical challenges for orbital data centers.

Will the Tesla stock in your portfolio be abandoned because of SpaceX’s listing? This is likely the source of the most intense anxiety for secondary market investors recently. After all, when investors are given the chance to bet directly on the "stars and the universe," who would still linger on electric vehicles down on Earth?
However, within Musk's grand chessboard, this "either/or" mindset is precisely the greatest misreading of the battlefield. SpaceX’s IPO is by no means a bloodletting of Tesla’s capital; on the contrary, it is the booster rocket for Tesla to complete its final evolutionary form. If SpaceX is responsible for building the physical skeleton leading to the future, then Tesla is responsible for injecting the intelligent soul. The strategic convergence of the two constitutes the complete closed loop of Musk’s business empire.

Source: the space investor
SpaceX’s current valuation in the private market has reached astonishing levels, with rumors suggesting an IPO target valuation as high as $1.5 trillion. Simultaneously, Musk’s personal net worth is approaching $500 billion. It seems he is already "wealthy enough to rival nations," so why reach out to the public for money?

Source: Forbes
Because in the face of the Mars Plan, these figures are still a drop in the bucket. According to Musk’s public vision, establishing a self-sustaining city on Mars requires transporting at least 1 million tons of materials to the Martian surface. Based on the current design payload of "Starship," this implies a fleet of approximately 1,000 ships. Including the need for orbital refueling, the total number of launches for round trips would be at least 10,000. Even if Starship can drive the cost of a single launch down to $100 million (a fraction of the current industry average), the launch costs alone would amount to $1 trillion.
There is a huge cognitive error here: Market Cap does not equal Cash. Although Nvidia has a market cap of $4 trillion and the US GDP forecast for 2025 is about $31 trillion, this does not mean $1 trillion is a small number. A cash expenditure (CapEx) of $1 trillion exceeds the US Department of Defense's total annual budget (approx. $850 billion) and far surpasses the cash reserves on the books of any tech giant.
The conclusion is obvious: Relying on Musk’s personal wealth, the limited private equity (PE) market, or even the traditional terrestrial economic system cannot support this ambition. SpaceX chooses to IPO not for traditional shareholder cash-outs, but to initiate a "crowdfunding" campaign targeting humanity's excess liquidity, thereby completing the most expensive engineering project in human history.
For Tesla shareholders, this massive capital requirement is no longer a nightmare, but a relief. In the past, Tesla actually played the role of the "donor heart" for Musk’s empire. Whenever SpaceX R&D hit a snag or Twitter (now X) urgently needed funds, Tesla’s stock price would often fluctuate violently due to Musk’s large-scale sell-offs, leaving shareholders trembling.
After the IPO, SpaceX will possess an independent financing platform with strong "blood-making" capabilities. Tesla will no longer be Musk’s ATM, but a protected core asset. Furthermore, as SpaceX’s liquidity is released, Musk could potentially use his personal SpaceX holdings for collateral or monetization to repurchase Tesla shares, thereby increasing his control and ensuring Tesla’s AI development direction isn't swayed by short-term capital.
Before discussing Mars, we need to understand SpaceX’s current money-making logic. According to estimates by the authoritative space media outlet Payload, SpaceX’s revenue is expected to reach $22 billion to $24 billion in 2026, with a year-over-year growth rate exceeding 50%. This is not just a rocket company; it is a massive commercial ecosystem taking shape. We can break down its business structure through the following three core pillars:

Source: Bryce Briefing

Source: retirewithrohit
This is the logic most easily overlooked by the market, yet it holds the most explosive potential: The money raised by the SpaceX IPO is essentially expanding Tesla’s "brain capacity."
Musk has mentioned multiple times that while building data centers in space faces huge engineering challenges regarding heat dissipation and radiation, from the perspective of First Principles of Physics, this is not only "feasible" but perhaps an "inevitable path" for the development of AI civilization. As AI model parameters expand exponentially, terrestrial computing power is facing the limit challenges of physics. The combination of SpaceX and Tesla is reconstructing the future of AI computing power through three dimensions, from shallow to deep:
It can be said that if Microsoft Azure is OpenAI’s cloud service provider, then SpaceX is Tesla’s exclusive, physically isolated, energy-infinite, and light-speed "Space-Based Cloud Service Provider."
Once we straighten out the logic of computing power and energy, the Mars Plan is no longer a distant sci-fi novel, but a clearly visible supply chain order.
What is the most expensive cost of going to Mars? Not rocket fuel, but "sustaining human life." Humans are too fragile; we need oxygen, water, food, and extremely expensive radiation protection equipment. According to First Principles, the most economical colonization plan is straightforward: Robots first, humans later.
In this closed loop, SpaceX provides cheap interstellar transport services (Starship) and orbital computing/communication support (Starlink + Orbital Data Centers); while Tesla is responsible for manufacturing the labor force capable of working in harsh environments (Optimus) and ground energy storage systems (Megapack).
Once SpaceX IPO funds are in place and Mars base construction begins, Tesla will receive the largest hardware procurement order in human history. Millions of Optimus robots will be sent to Mars, utilizing solar energy and local resources to build bases, paving the way for the subsequent arrival of humans. At this point, Tesla’s valuation logic will completely detach from "automaker" and even "terrestrial tech company," evolving into a true "Interstellar Infrastructure Supplier."
SpaceX does not need to look for cornerstone investors because global top-tier capital has already entered the game. From long-term financial capital represented by Fidelity to tech giants represented by Google and Oracle, they have already placed their bets with real money. For Google and Oracle, this is not just a financial investment, but a strategic hedge on space-based computing networks—they must ensure they are not excluded from the future physical infrastructure. However, even with giants gathering, Musk still locks down absolute control through a tight dual-class share structure. This sends a clear signal to all IPO participants: You are buying a ticket to the future, not the voice to steer the ship. This mechanism effectively isolates Wall Street’s pressure for short-term financial reports from Musk’s Mars vision spanning decades, ensuring the giant ship always sails according to the Chief Engineer’s will.
More importantly, if SpaceX lists with a $1.5 trillion valuation, it will become Tesla’s strongest "Value Anchor." Market logic will be forced to reconstruct: If SpaceX, as the company providing "Hard Infrastructure (Roads)," is worth $1.5 trillion, then the value cap for Tesla, the only entity in the ecosystem providing "Soft Intelligence & Labor (Cars/People)," will be blown wide open. As the "exclusive supplier" in Musk’s interstellar map, Tesla’s valuation logic will completely break away from "car manufacturing" and instead be viewed as a super-growth stock monopolizing the Martian economy. The more expensive SpaceX becomes, the higher the "gold content" of Tesla.

Source: Jarsy
Despite the grand prospects, short-term risks remain. The most direct risk is capital diversion. In the short term, the market’s capital pool is limited, and institutional investors have caps on their allocation for "Musk concept stocks." SpaceX’s listing might siphon off some liquidity from Tesla, especially from passive funds that simply want "Musk exposure." Additionally, orbital data centers still face huge technical challenges; for example, how to solve the heat generated by high-density computing through radiative cooling in a vacuum remains an engineering problem that has not been fully conquered.
SpaceX’s IPO is destined to become a watershed moment in business history. It is not only to solve the funding gap for the Mars Plan but to break through the physical bottlenecks of Tesla’s AI evolution. We are witnessing an exciting positive feedback loop: The further SpaceX flies, the stronger orbital computing becomes; the stronger orbital computing becomes, the smarter Tesla’s FSD and robots get; the smarter the robots get, the lower the cost of building a Mars base.
For investors, this is no longer a choice between investing in the "Road" (SpaceX) or the "Car" (Tesla), but whether you are willing to bet on the next leap of human civilization. When Musk casts his gaze toward the stars, SpaceX and Tesla are the two wings in his hands. In this grand vision, pessimists are often right, but optimists are often successful. Are you ready for this ticket to the future?