tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
Search

Historical Return

Cumulative Return-10.18%
Annualized Return+13.07%
5Y
1M
3M
1Y
3Y
5Y
5-Year Performance-16.16%

Current Holdings

No.
Name
Price
Chg %
Industry
Score
Watchlist
eBay Inc
EBAY
91.040
+3.48%
Software & IT Services
7.63
EverQuote Inc
EVER
15.430
+1.58%
Software & IT Services
7.66
Alphabet Inc Class C
GOOG
286.890
+4.80%
Software & IT Services
7.39
4
Alphabet Inc Class A
GOOGL
287.620
+4.84%
Software & IT Services
7.52
5
Mastercard Inc
MA
499.715
+3.20%
Software & IT Services
8.25
6
MercadoLibre Inc
MELI
1728.760
+8.08%
Software & IT Services
7.22
7
Meta Platforms Inc
META
572.100
+8.82%
Software & IT Services
7.88
8
NetEase Inc
NTES
111.930
+2.44%
Software & IT Services
7.44
9
Pinterest Inc
PINS
18.350
+3.32%
Software & IT Services
7.79
10
Reddit Inc
RDDT
134.690
+10.55%
Software & IT Services
7.4
11
Shopify Inc
SHOP
118.620
+6.05%
Software & IT Services
7.05
12
ThredUp Inc
TDUP
3.289
+3.43%
Software & IT Services
6.89
13
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
TME
9.280
-1.59%
Software & IT Services
7.23
14
Uber Technologies Inc
UBER
71.930
+3.98%
Software & IT Services
7.8
15
Yalla Group Ltd
YALA
6.255
+4.08%
Software & IT Services
5.75

How We Select Online Services Stocks

AI Tip

TradingKey's online stock selection strategy is fundamentally rooted in the nature of these businesses, with primary emphasis on three interdependent pillars: user growth, network effects, and monetization capabilities. A successful online platform must first achieve healthy expansion in user scale and sustained high activity levels, then efficiently convert user attention and behavior into revenue streams. The long-term sustainability and profitability of this process ultimately hinge on the depth and durability of the moat constructed through network effects. This strategy provides a systematic framework for evaluating these critical dimensions.

3. User Scale and Activity

Goal: Confirm the sustained effectiveness of the platform’s growth engine

Users form the foundational source of value for any internet platform; absent continuous user expansion and high-frequency engagement, subsequent monetization efforts and ecosystem development cannot take hold. Our objective is to identify platforms that continue to exhibit robust or even accelerating user growth, or those where overall scale may be stabilizing but engagement depth and participation metrics are still meaningfully improving—while avoiding names where user growth has plateaued, and activity levels are deteriorating. We track levels, growth rates, and industry rankings of monthly active users (MAU) and daily active users (DAU). More critically, we analyze engagement depth indicators such as average daily time spent and next-month retention rates. Data interpretation is contextualized by product lifecycle stage: for platforms in growth mode, priority is given to user growth rates and market penetration; for mature platforms, emphasis shifts to stickiness, penetration gains among specific cohorts, and progress in international expansion.

2. Monetization Efficiency

Goal: Achieve high-quality revenue growth

We concentrate on a platform’s ability to effectively convert traffic and user attention into sustainable revenue. The focus is on high-quality growth—revenue expansion that stems from genuine value extraction from users rather than degradation of the user experience. We seek companies with clearly articulated and well-executed strategies for increasing per-user value, enabling monetization progress to drive concurrent margin expansion. The central metric is average revenue per user (ARPU) and its trend trajectory. We decompose ARPU growth drivers to distinguish between improvements in payment penetration rates versus increases in average spend per paying user. Across business models—whether advertising, transaction commissions, subscriptions, or value-added services—we examine efficiency indicators such as ad load and effective cost per mille (eCPM), platform gross merchandise volume (GMV) paired with take rates, subscription gross margins, and related metrics. Sustainable improvements in monetization efficiency should reinforce a virtuous cycle with user scale and data accumulation.

3. Network Effects and Moats

Goal: Evaluate the foundation of long-term competitive advantage

Network effects represent the most formidable and durable moats in online service business models. Our objective is to invest in platforms where these effects are both significant and actively strengthening. For such platforms, value scales exponentially with user growth, creating formidable barriers that new entrants struggle to overcome and thereby securing long-term profit sustainability and pricing power. We distinguish between direct network effects (user-to-user interactions) and indirect, data-driven effects by examining interaction density among users, content generation volume, and supply-demand matching efficiency. We assess multi-homing costs—the friction users face when simultaneously using competing platforms—as a key indicator of lock-in. Moat depth is ultimately reflected in switching costs, brand mindshare dominance, and ecosystem completeness. Platforms with robust network effects see their competitive advantages deepen progressively over time.

FAQs

What is ARPU? Why is it critical for online services?

ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) quantifies the average revenue generated from each user and serves as a core indicator of a platform’s underlying profit potential. User scale alone does not equate to economic value; only when users can be effectively monetized does scale translate into meaningful financial returns. In mature phases, improvements in ARPU often become more important than incremental user growth, as they reflect the platform’s pricing power, depth of service offerings, and overall ecosystem strength.

Is e-commerce still a growth industry by 2026?

While overall e-commerce penetration growth has moderated, this does not imply the sector has lost investment relevance.

Growth momentum has shifted toward more specialized areas: vertical-specific platforms, service-oriented commerce models, e-commerce infrastructure providers, and enabling technology services.

The industry is transitioning from a pure "scale-first" phase to one focused on "efficiency enhancement"—a natural and inevitable evolution in a maturing market.

Are gig economy stocks like Uber and DoorDash safe investments?

The primary risks for gig economy platforms do not stem from demand stability but from the sustainability of their unit economics and ongoing regulatory uncertainty.

Even with stable user demand, long-term shareholder returns can remain constrained unless the underlying unit economics continue to improve meaningfully.

The critical investment questions are whether the company has crossed the breakeven threshold and whether it possesses genuine, durable pricing power in its marketplace.

Related News

View more
KeyAI