tradingkey.logo

Hain Celestial (HAIN) Q2 2026 Earnings Transcript

The Motley FoolFeb 9, 2026 2:37 PM
Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Feb. 9, 2026, 8 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • President and Chief Executive Officer — Alison Lewis
  • Chief Financial Officer — Lee Boyce

TAKEAWAYS

  • North America Snacks Divestiture -- Announced definitive agreement to sell the North America snacks business to Snackrupters for $115 million in cash, with all proceeds allocated to debt reduction.
  • Business Mix Impact -- North America snacks accounted for 22% of company net sales in fiscal 2025 and 38% of North America segment sales, yet had negligible EBITDA contribution over the last twelve months.
  • Financial Profile Post-Divestiture -- Remaining North America portfolio is expected to deliver gross margins above 30% and EBITDA margin in the low double digits after mitigation of stranded costs.
  • Q2 Organic Net Sales -- Decreased 7% year over year, reflecting a 9-point volume mix decline and a 2-point price increase.
  • Adjusted Gross Margin -- 19.5% for the quarter, a decrease of 340 basis points year over year, driven by cost inflation and lower volume mix, partly offset by productivity and pricing.
  • Adjusted EBITDA -- $24 million for the quarter, versus $38 million prior year, with margin at 6.3%.
  • SG&A Expense -- Down 13% to $61 million; now 15.9% of net sales compared to 17% the previous year.
  • North America Segment Performance -- Organic net sales declined 10% year over year, primarily due to declines in Snacks and baby formula, with beverage growth partially offsetting.
  • International Segment Performance -- Organic net sales declined 3%, improving from a 4% decline in the prior quarter, mainly due to moderation in baby and kids declines.
  • Q2 Free Cash Flow -- Reached $30 million, up 22% from $25 million in the prior year, mainly from inventory delivery and higher cash earnings.
  • Net Debt and Liquidity -- Net debt decreased to $637 million, a $32 million reduction, with $68 million cash on hand and $144 million available liquidity under the revolver.
  • Inventory and Payables -- Days inventory outstanding improved to 75 days, and days payable outstanding reached 57 days, reflecting better operating discipline.
  • Interest Expense -- Increased 22% year over year to $16 million, mainly due to higher rates and increased amortization of deferred financing fees.
  • Restructuring Charges -- Year-to-date charges reached $103 million, now expected to total $115–$125 million, with an increase related to the snack divestiture.
  • Leverage Profile -- Pro forma for the snacks sale, leverage expected to fall from 4.9x to approximately 4.0x, providing meaningful covenant headroom.
  • Category Performance -- Snacks -- Organic net sales down 20% year over year, led by club distribution losses and velocity challenges.
  • Category Performance -- Baby and Kids -- Organic net sales down 14%, with double-digit growth in North America finger foods and cereal segments.
  • Category Performance -- Beverages -- Organic net sales up 3%, led by tea growth and new product launches.
  • Category Performance -- Meal Prep -- Organic net sales down 1%, with North America yogurt growth offsetting UK softness in spreads and drizzles.
  • Capital Expenditure -- $7 million for the quarter, with full-year CapEx expected in the low $20 million range.
  • Stranded Cost Impact -- Anticipated $20–$25 million in stranded overhead from the snack divestiture, with detailed action plans to mitigate the majority within six to twelve months.
  • Guidance Policy -- No numeric guidance for fiscal 2026 operating results due to ongoing strategic review, with pro forma financials to be provided upon snack divestiture closing.
  • Profitability Outlook -- Management expects the divestiture to be gross margin and EBITDA accretive for the North America portfolio, improving both financial flexibility and investment capability.
  • Credit Facility Status -- Facility matures December 2026 and is classified as a current liability; all covenants remain in compliance with significant headroom.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

  • Adjusted gross margin declined 340 basis points year over year to 19.5%, "driven by cost inflation, lower volume mix, and unfavorable fixed cost absorption," with only partial offset from productivity and pricing.
  • Adjusted EBITDA dropped 37% to $24 million from $38 million last year, primarily "from lower gross margins, partially offset by a reduction in SG&A."
  • Interest expense increased 22% year over year to $16 million, with exposure to "higher spread as well as increased amortization of deferred financing fees as a result of the amendment of our credit agreement."
  • Stranded overhead from the snack divestiture is expected to create $20–$25 million in short-term cost pressure, with a "number of elements. It's primarily in the SG&A side, a little bit in our distribution and warehousing network," although action plans are in place for mitigation.

SUMMARY

Hain Celestial Group (NASDAQ:HAIN) announced the sale of its North America snacks business for $115 million, with proceeds directly applied to deleverage, marking the first execution step of its strategic review. Management highlighted sequential improvement in the international segment and emphasized operational gains including better forecasting, reduced inventory days, and enhanced cash flow, while reiterating that core tea, yogurt, and baby and kids categories remain stable. The company reported lower year-over-year revenue, margin compression, and higher interest expense, but significant cash generation and reduction in net debt. Actions underway to resolve stranded costs, combined with plans for selective portfolio investment, signal management’s confidence in improved profitability for the remainder of the fiscal year and a structurally stronger set of core categories post-divestiture.

  • Leadership described North America post-divestiture as "healthier financially and more focused," anticipating further asset streamlining as part of the ongoing strategic review.
  • Management expects second-half sequential improvements from innovation, price realization, and disciplined cost control, particularly in flagship categories and international markets.
  • The outlook for leverage, post-transaction, projects a reduction from 4.9x to about 4.0x, supported by consistent engagement with lenders and additional asset sales under consideration.
  • Capital expenditures will remain tightly managed, with the focus primarily on supporting growth in the company’s strongest performing categories.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; used as a profitability and cash flow proxy in company analysis.
  • SG&A: Selling, general, and administrative expenses; indirect costs not directly tied to production, impacting overall profitability.
  • Stranded Overhead: Fixed costs remaining after a divestiture that no longer have proportional revenue support, requiring focused mitigation to protect margins.
  • RGM (Revenue Growth Management): Strategic approach to optimizing pricing, promotion, and mix to drive profitable revenue growth.
  • SKU: Stock Keeping Unit; unique identifier for each product or variation sold.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Alison Lewis, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lee Boyce, our Chief Financial Officer. Slide two shows our forward-looking statements disclaimer. As you are aware, during the course of this call, we may make forward-looking statements within the meanings of federal security. These include expectations and assumptions regarding the company's future operations and financial performance. These statements are based on our current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations.

Please refer to our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports filed from time to time with the SEC, as well as the press release issued this morning for a detailed discussion of the risks. We have also prepared a presentation inclusive of additional supplemental financial information, which is posted on our website at hain.com under the Investors heading. We discuss our results today, unless noted as reported, our remarks will focus on non-GAAP or adjusted financial measures. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP results are available in the earnings release and the slide presentation accompanying this call. This call is being webcast, and an archive will be made available on the website.

And now I'd like to turn the call over to Alison.

Alison Lewis: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call and for your continued support of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Today, we will discuss the actions we are taking to advance our turnaround strategy and the results for our second quarter. First, let me start with an update on our strategic review. As previously communicated, we have been conducting a comprehensive strategic review with the goal of simplifying our portfolio, enhancing our financial flexibility, reducing our leverage profile, and maximizing shareholder value. The assessment phase involves a thorough review of our assets, operations, and market opportunities.

As a result, we are executing our first decisive step to sharpen our focus on categories and brands in key markets where we can leverage our organizational strength. On February 2, we announced that we reached a definitive agreement to sell our North American snacks business to Snackrupters, a family-owned manufacturer of food and baked goods in Canada, for $115 million in cash. Proceeds from the transaction will be used to reduce debt, thereby strengthening our company's financial position and leverage profile. I am confident that in Snackrupters, we have found the right home for our beloved snack brands and the employees who support them.

I want to express my gratitude to the many talented employees who have built our North American snack brands over the years. Their commitment has been instrumental to reaching this milestone. This divestiture marks a pivotal moment for Hain as we focus to grow. The simplified portfolio that emerges in North America following the divestiture is stronger financially with a more robust margin and cash flow profile to drive growth. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s North America snacks represented 22% of the company's net sales in fiscal 2025 and 38% of the North America segment's net sales, with negligible EBITDA contribution over the last twelve months.

The financial profile of the remaining portfolio in North America is meaningfully stronger and expected to deliver EBITDA margin in the low double digits, underpinned by gross margins above 30%. Our North America business will be healthier financially and more focused as we concentrate on three flagship categories: tea, yogurt, and baby and kids, while we continue to develop our meal prep platform. This portfolio remains diverse across life stages, is aligned with better-for-you trends, and is quite GLP-1 resistant, meeting evolving consumer needs. This recently announced divestiture is the first visible step in the execution phase of the strategic review we initiated with Goldman Sachs.

This transaction is a clear example of how we intend to use the value embedded in our portfolio to meaningfully reduce debt, strengthen our balance sheet, and sharpen our strategic focus. In parallel, we are actively advancing the next phase of this review to further simplify our portfolio with a clear priority on continued deleveraging. We expect the resulting financial flexibility will allow increasing investment over time, enabling us to drive sustainable, profitable growth and create long-term shareholder value. I'd like to discuss the concrete operational progress we've made to advance our turnaround strategy and the positive changes we're driving across the organization.

We are beginning to see measurable results from the steps we've taken to reshape our cost structure, enhance our operating model, and execute our five actions to win. As a reminder, our turnaround strategy is centered on five key actions to win: streamlining our portfolio, accelerating brand renovation and innovation, implementing strategic revenue growth management and pricing, driving productivity and working capital efficiency, and strengthening our digital capabilities. Underpinning our turnaround strategy is enhanced operating discipline. Early signals across forecast accuracy, inventory management, service levels, and productivity reinforce our confidence that we are enhancing operating discipline, tightening production processes, improving cash efficiency, and establishing a strong foundation for long-term growth.

For example, forecast accuracy in the US rose by four points quarter over quarter, and in December, reached the highest level in the last several years. This contributed to a four-day improvement in days' inventory outstanding in North America, while international improved by nine days, driving improved cash flow. In terms of service level increases, North America was over 96% in the quarter, our best service level in recent history, enhancing our ability to meet demand and support sustainable growth. Further, we drove 13% improvement in SG&A year over year, or 120 basis points as a percent of sales, and productivity remains on track to hit our targets for the fiscal year, supporting our ability to reinvest in the business.

On this improved operational foundation, we are driving Hain forward with a focused portfolio, more brand renovation and innovation, rigorous pricing and promotion execution, and enhanced digital marketing and e-commerce capabilities that position us to accelerate growth and improve profitability. Turning now to quarterly results. Our second quarter results reflect both the meaningful progress we are driving and the near-term pressure we continue to navigate, particularly from volume-driven deleverage in select parts of the portfolio. Even with these headwinds, we delivered important wins: strong cash flow, a reduction in net debt, and a clear sequential improvement in both top and bottom line trends in our international business.

The core of our business is stable with continued growth in North America tea, yogurt, and in baby kids. Finger foods across both regions. Organic net sales in Q2 were flat year over year when excluding the known hotspots of North America snacks and Ella's Kitchen wet baby food, as well as Earth's Best baby formula, which is impacted by lapping supply recovery last year. SG&A performance was a standout with disciplined execution driving meaningful improvement. Adjusted EBITDA of $24 million reflected volume mix impact and cost inflation. Importantly, the actions we are taking across innovation, pricing, and brand investment should position us for a stronger second half.

We remain fully committed to delivering improved top and bottom line performance in the back half of the year as these initiatives take hold, executing with discipline to strengthen our cost structure and position the business for growth. We are advancing our turnaround strategy with urgency and this quarter demonstrated meaningful strategic and operational progress. We are sharpening our portfolio and strengthening our balance sheet through the divestiture, giving us greater financial flexibility alongside an improved margin and cash flow profile. Our core categories are stable, our operational execution is improving, and the actions underway across simplification, pricing, innovation, productivity, and digital provide a clear path to sequential improvement in the back half of the year.

I'll now turn the call over to Lee to review our second quarter results in more detail, along with our outlook.

Lee Boyce: Thank you, Alison, and good morning, everyone. For the second quarter, we saw an organic net sales decline of 7% year over year, driven by lower sales in both the North America and international segments. The decline in organic net sales growth reflects a nine-point decrease in volume mix and a two-point increase in price. As Alison mentioned, organic net sales trends in the second quarter were flat year over year and in line with Q1 when excluding North American snacks, and Ella's Kitchen wet baby food, along with Earth's Best baby formula, which was cycling a significant return to market pipeline.

Adjusted gross margin was 19.5% in the second quarter, a decrease of approximately 340 basis points year over year. The decrease was driven by cost inflation, lower volume mix, and unfavorable fixed cost absorption, partially offset by productivity and pricing. Actions already underway, including SKU simplification, revenue growth management, targeted pricing, and productivity initiatives along with efforts across key manufacturing sites to improve plant absorption, and reduce discards, position us well for margin improvement in the back half. SG&A decreased 13% year over year to $61 million in the second quarter, driven by a reduction in employee-related expenses and non-people cost discipline.

As we implemented overhead reduction actions, SG&A represented 15.9% of net sales for the quarter, as compared to 17% in the year-ago period. We are nearly finished with our restructuring program to date having taken a $103 million in charges associated with the transformation program. Excluding inventory write-downs, the total charges are now expected to be $115 to $125 million reflecting a $15 million increase related to actions anticipated in connection with the sale of the North American snacks business. We remain on track to deliver the targeted $130 million to $150 million in benefits through fiscal 2027.

Interest rose 22% year over year to $16 million in the quarter, primarily driven by higher spread as well as increased amortization of deferred financing fees as a result of the amendment of our credit agreement. We have hedged our rate exposure on more than 50% of our loan facility with fixed rates of 7.1%. We continue to prioritize reducing debt over time. Adjusted net loss, which excludes the effects of restructuring charges, amongst other items, was $3 million in the quarter, or 3¢ per diluted share as compared to an adjusted net income of $8 million or $0.08 per diluted share in the prior year period.

We delivered adjusted EBITDA of $24 million in the second quarter, compared to $38 million a year ago. The decrease was driven primarily by lower gross margins partially offset by a reduction in SG&A. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 6.3%. Turning now to our individual segments. In North America, organic net sales declined 10% year over year. The decrease was primarily driven by lower volume in Snacks and by baby formula, partially offset by growth in beverages. Excluding snacks, organic net sales in the quarter would have declined by 3%. The core is relatively healthy with growth in tea, yogurt, and Earth's Best finger food and cereal.

Second quarter adjusted gross margin in North America was 20.8%, a 440 basis point decrease versus the prior year period. The decrease was driven primarily by lower volume, cost inflation, and unfavorable fixed cost absorption, partially offset by productivity savings and pricing. Excluding snacks and eaves, which we previously announced we were exiting, gross margin would have been 28.6% in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA in North America was $11 million, or 5.5% of net sales, reflecting a decrease of 57% from the year-ago period. The decrease resulted primarily from lower gross margins, partially offset by a reduction in SG&A expenses. Excluding snacks and eaves, EBITDA margin on a comparable basis would have been 12.8% in the quarter.

In our international business, organic net sales declined 3% in the quarter, primarily driven by lower sales in baby and kids. This represents an improvement from the 4% decline in organic net sales in the first quarter, driven primarily by a moderation in declines in baby and kids. International adjusted gross margin was 18.1%, a 200 basis point decrease versus the prior year period. The decrease was driven primarily by cost inflation, unfavorable fixed cost absorption, and lower volume mix, partially offset by productivity savings and pricing. Adjusted EBITDA was $19 million or 10.2% of net sales, reflecting a decrease of 16% compared to the prior year period. The decrease resulted primarily from lower gross margins.

Now turning to category performance.

Alison Lewis: Organic net sales in snacks was down 20% year over year, driven by club distribution losses and velocity challenges in North America. Importantly, we are seeing velocity improvements with our recent avocado innovation and multipack optimization. And our seasonal innovation performed particularly well, with ghosts and bats for Halloween, and more recently, holiday trees. In baby and kids, organic net sales growth was down 14% year over year, driven primarily by industry-wide softness in wet baby food in The UK, as well as formula in North America, driven by lapping the return to market pipeline.

We have continued to see strength in best finger foods and cereal in North America, each showing dollar sales growth of low double digits percent year over year. Ella's Kitchen Finger Food also saw organic net sales growth up high teens year over year. And while still in decline, are seeing signs of stabilization in the wet baby food category in The UK. In the beverages category, organic net sales growth was 3% year over year, driven by tea in North America, and demonstrating an acceleration from the 2% growth year over year Q1, Celestial Seasoning Bad Tea grew dollar sales in the quarter, in part due to the recent launch of wellness innovation.

In meal prep, organic net sales growth was down 1% year over year. A softness in spreads and drizzles in The UK was partially offset by strength in yogurt in North America. Greek gods grew dollar and unit sales in the quarter, by high teens percent and gain share. Shifting to cash flow and the balance sheet. As Alison mentioned, we had strong cash delivery in the quarter, Free cash flow in the second quarter was $30 million, an increase of 22% compared to $25 million in the year-ago period. The improvement was primarily driven by inventory delivery, higher cash earnings, and improved payables, partially offset by lower recovery of accounts receivable.

We are pleased with the progress we're making on inventory, driven by improved operating discipline. Inventory continues to be an area of focus for fiscal 2026. Days inventory outstanding improved to seventy-five days in the quarter compared to eighty-three days in Q1 2026, and seventy-seven days in the prior year period. Each day of inventory is worth approximately $3.5 million. We also made progress in our days payable outstanding, with days payable outstanding of fifty-seven days in the quarter, in line with Q1, and an improvement from fifty-six days in the year-ago period. CapEx was $7 million in the quarter, was up slightly from $6 million in the prior year period.

We now expect capital expenditures to be in the low $20 million for fiscal 2026. Strong cash flow generation in the quarter for cash on hand to $68 million and net debt to $637 million, a reduction of $32 million. We also have a $144 million of available liquidity under our revolver and remain in compliance with all credit agreement covenants. Our credit facility matures in December 2026. Accordingly, have classified all of the associated borrowings as a current liability in our 10-Q. We have a disciplined approach to capital management and continue to prioritize debt reduction as the primary use of cash as we continue to act proactively to manage the upcoming maturity.

Over the last ten quarters, we have reduced net debt by $140 million. We expect to generate additional operating cash flow during the balance of fiscal 2026, including the collection in January of $26 million of insurance proceeds, and ongoing working capital improvement meaningfully reducing debt obligations in the ordinary course of business. Our strategic review has yielded a multistage plan aimed at materially improving liquidity and leverage. The sale of the North American snacks business is an important first step, with net proceeds dedicated to debt repayment. Pro forma for the transaction, leverage would fall from 4.9 times at quarter end to approximately four times.

As we execute the next phase of this plan, we are advancing additional actions to enhance financial flexibility, improve performance, and address the upcoming credit agreement maturity, including further asset sales and operational improvements. We believe that aligning the maturity solution timing with the execution of the multistage plan will enable us to achieve the strongest long-term outcome for the company and shareholders. We remain actively engaged with our lenders and are assessing opportunities to refinance our debt or extend maturities, while evaluating potential capital raising or strategic transactions. We believe that the successful execution of these plans will enable us to refinance, extend, or repay our debt prior to maturity from a position of strength.

Turning now to our outlook. As previously communicated, we are not providing numeric guidance on fiscal 2026 operating results at this time, given the uncertainty around the outcome and timing of the completion of our strategic review. We intend to provide pro forma financials upon closure of the North American Snacks divestiture, expected in February. Looking ahead, we expect the divestiture of North American Snacks to be gross margin and EBITDA accretive, and the profile of the go-forward North American portfolio to have gross margin above 30% and EBITDA margin in the low double digits.

As for fiscal 2026, we continue to expect strong cost management and productivity along with execution against our five actions to win in the marketplace, to drive stronger top and bottom line performance in the second half of the year as compared to the first half. And for the full year, we continue to expect positive free cash flow. Before I turn back to Alison, I want to underscore the actions we are taking to strengthen our financial position. We are enhancing our flexibility and improving performance through initiatives to stabilize sales, improve profitability, optimize cash, and reduce debt.

The strategic review and agreement to sell our North American snacks business are important steps, and we continue to advance additional actions. With solid liquidity, strong cash delivery in the quarter, and positive free cash flow expected in fiscal 2026, we remain confident in our ability to drive improved performance in the second half and beyond. Now I'll turn the call back to Alison for some closing remarks.

Alison Lewis: Thanks, Lee. In summary, I want to reaffirm our confidence in the direction we have set for the company. This quarter marks a pivotal moment in our journey. We have taken a significant first step to sharpen our focus and strengthen our financial position. We are engaging in ruthless focus, fewer categories, fewer brands, and fewer SKUs, enabling concentration on areas that better align with our strengths and core capabilities. We are making tangible progress in improving our operational health and enhancing cash delivery. The actions we have taken will drive a structural reset of our margins. And we continue to identify and remove costs from the business, freeing up fuel to invest.

Q2 results demonstrate strong cash delivery, reduction in net debt, and a stable core business. We are attacking our challenges head-on and nurturing growth through our five actions to win. We are encouraged by the progress we are making as we focus on executing our strategy and building momentum quarter by quarter. While we continue to navigate pockets of pressure, we are executing with resolve, and we remain confident that the steps we are taking today position Hain to deliver sustainable, profitable growth and long-term value for our shareholders. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we are now happy to take your questions. Operator, please open the line.

Operator: At this time, I would like to remind everyone, in order to ask a question, press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. And your first question comes from the line of Jim Salera with Stephens Inc. Please go ahead.

Jim Salera: Hey, Alison and Lee. Good morning. Thanks for taking our question. Wanted to start off with maybe some more details around the decision to divest the Snacks portfolio. If we go back to the Investor Day in 2023, you guys called out a couple of different categories, you know, to focus on as you grow. Snacks was one. The baby and kids, and then beverages. I think there's six brands, three of which were snacks. And then over the preceding years, there's been a lot of focus on innovation in the Snacks portfolio, you know, getting better placement and away from home, things like that. And so clearly, something's changed.

You guys think that there's more value in focusing on other areas of the portfolio. So we just love you could kind of help us bridge, you know, what changed in your thinking or what you've seen in the market from, you know, that 2023 until now to result in divesting the snacks.

Alison Lewis: Sure. I'll jump in first. So good morning. Look. You know that our first action to win is all about simplifying our portfolio. We needed to take some action in North America that would allow us to really focus to grow. As we assess the various businesses, stepping back and looking at sort of rights to win and what it takes to win in a category like snacks, the reality is that there are a lot of capabilities given that this is an impulse category that I would argue are more difficult for us to develop. So if you think about impulse categories that are fundamentally demand creation categories, you need to have, you know, really heavy and intense innovation.

You need to have strong marketing investment consistently. You need to have DSD-like merchandising to drive again, kind of that impulse purchase. If you look at sort of the rest of our portfolio, it tends to be more center of store in North America and center of store categories are fundamentally demand fulfillment. Demand's already there, and it's not quite as competitively intense. So that is, you know, one of the key reasons when we looked at, you know, our portfolio where was sort of the biggest opportunity for simplification. I'll also add, and you saw that, you know, snacks over the years had become somewhat financially challenged for us as a company.

We had become over-reliant on the club channel. That club channel is really great when you have that business, really challenging when you don't have that business. And so again, we had to look at how do we build a portfolio that financially is structured to grow. And we firmly believe that as we divest the Snacks business, having a portfolio in North America that has gross margins 30 plus percent and has EBITDA margins in the low single digits, it's going to put us in a position where we truly can invest and truly can focus to grow.

Jim Salera: Yeah. I would agree. I guess just building on that to what Alison said, I mean, the operating model, talent profile, capital allocation priorities are very different. You know? And what we called out is you kind of look forward is, Snacks, and we also said Eaves as well because that's another piece of business we previously disclosed that we've gotten out of. The gross margin profile of those businesses is 28.6. You know, the ongoing margin profile, the gross margin profile of the remainder of the North American business, we anticipate being greater than 30%.

So, you know, and again, we don't like to do kind of x but if you take out a couple of things specifically around snacks, and then some, you know, some category softness that we've had in kids. You know, we were actually flat. So that speaks to kind of the rest of the portfolio. So we think we are better positioned as we move forward with a higher profitability portfolio.

Jim Salera: The estimate reallocating some of the innovations? I imagine if you're not having the Snacks portfolio anymore, that frees up some internal capabilities. To then pivot to innovation in the remaining categories. Can you talk through maybe some of the stranded overhead, what those costs are? And if we could expect to see more innovation in, you know, the remaining categories whether it's in the back half of this year or maybe that's a 2027 event?

Lee Boyce: Yeah. We did call out the stranded cost. I don't think, you know, we can probably didn't verbally speak to it, but it was on one of the slides. So the stranded cost impact is about $20 million to $25 million. So those are costs that are allocated to Snacks right now. We have really concrete plans to execute to mitigate the majority of those costs within the six to twelve month, time frame.

And, again, you know, it will free up, you know, resources some of that would obviously would drop through, but also just free up resources as we support those innovations, as we make sure that we have kind of adequate market expenditure against the rest of the portfolio.

Alison Lewis: Yeah. I'll just I do think your point is right that we will be able to put more investment and more time and energy against the innovation for the balance of the portfolio and we really are seeing, I think I've talked to you before about how we're doubling down on innovation both in our North America and our international segments. We're seeing that those innovations that we're putting in the market, whether it's single-serve yogurt and with the Greek gods, you know, or wellness tea or Earth's Best snacks, we're seeing that those innovations are driving incrementality. They're driving share growth.

So innovation is absolutely critical in this segment or in the Better for You categories to bring new consumers in and ultimately get to growth and driving volume-based growth. So, yes, absolutely, we will continue to double down on innovation.

Jim Salera: Great. I appreciate the time. I'll pass it on.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Kaumil Gajrawala with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Kaumil Gajrawala: I guess a question on the divestiture in the context of cash. Obviously, you have some sort of cash coming in, but, were those businesses cash burn businesses where run rate perspective or whatever capital that was required? Like, how does that sort of bend the curve on your ability to generate cash?

Lee Boyce: Yeah. I mean, the Snacks is not a significant cash-generating business. I mean, we talked about the lower margin profile within it. You know, so it's a it I'd say from an ongoing kind of cash generation perspective, we're in a very, very good position. You know, one thing we did emphasize is, you know, as you look at Q2, we did have a really strong cash delivery. We will continue to be very focused on inventory reductions, continue to make progress on payables. The second thing, especially as we go into the second half, I think we also mentioned we do have $26 million that we got on January 2.

On insurance proceeds as well from a previous M&A activity. So I think we're in a good position moving forward. But to your question, I mean, the Snacks business was not a significant cash generation business for us.

Kaumil Gajrawala: Okay. Got it. And you provided some, I guess, thoughts on the upcoming maturity. You know, how much flexibility do you have? Is it leaning one direction versus the other? You know, refinance versus equity versus strategic? So there's feels like there's many moving parts. Just curious how should we be thinking about what you what your options are and how much flexibility there is as the date gets closer.

Lee Boyce: Yeah. So I'd say a few different things. I mean, we have a path. We're mindful of the upcoming maturities, and, you know, we're in frequent and constructive dialogue with our bank group. So, you know, what we did feel was that aligning the maturity solution with the execution of the strategic review will put us in a stronger long-term position. The key thing, obviously, with the execution of this divestiture, you did see on a pro forma basis our leverage decreased significantly, so going from 4.9 to four times. So again, we are also continuing under that strategic review to look at other options. So again, we're mindful of it. We're working through good discussion with our bank group.

And we're continuing to just do a, you know, thorough evaluation of our strategy in our portfolio. So again, the four times is versus the covenant we have. That takes us all the way through to the twenty-second December, which is 5.5 times. So have significant headroom under the current. But again, we're in ongoing dialogue to make sure that we come up with the right optimal long-term capital strategy.

Kaumil Gajrawala: Okay. Got it. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John Baumgartner with Mizuho. Please go ahead.

John Baumgartner: Good morning. Thanks for the question. Like to ask, Alison, I'd like to ask a follow-up to Jim's question and the characteristics for categories that you like and you wanna pursue. The profit improvement from the snack sale is clear. You know, as you progress in the second phase of review and presumably divest more assets, how do you envision Hain as a true growth business in the end? You know, I get the resource allocation. You have some bright spots with the Finger Foods and Kids. You know, there's pockets in meals that haven't really grown over time. In babies and kids, the fertility rates are declining across your market.

So how do you think about driving sustainable volume in that backdrop? Does it require larger price cuts to bring your products more within reach of, you know, sort of mainstream middle-income households and expand penetration that way?

Alison Lewis: You know, as I look at again, I'll sort of focus it, I guess, on North America given that we're focused there with the divestiture. As you look at the remaining portfolio in North America, as I mentioned, first of all, the demand fulfillment aspect of it is an area where I think we had strength and we've demonstrated, you know, consistent delivery over time. As you think about growth in the remaining portfolio, we talk about some of our flagship categories being our tea business, our yogurt business, and our Earth's Best baby and kid business. What you see is in those businesses, we have strength.

So if you look at, you know, we're a top three player in tea. We've shown that we can drive growth when we innovate. So our wellness innovations that we launched in June are a great example of that. They're driving share growth for us, share growth in the overall wellness category. When you look at our yogurt business, I mean that's a standout business for us with double-digit growth. Again, in a very specific area where we have strength. So whole milk, which is a growing area of, you know, interest in the overall dairy category where whole fat are something that consumers are moving more and more towards.

So again, a niche area within a broader player, but an area where we can build from a place of strength. And then the same with baby and kids. When I look at our snacks business and our cereal business, where, again, you know, we're number one in each of those categories. So we have strengths. We're seeing innovations that we're launching there are delivering results, double-digit growth in fact. So, again, the idea is play to your strengths. Find those sort of spots within those categories where you already are in a top three position and keep driving that. When it comes to meal prep, there's also areas within meal prep that I would argue are underpenetrated.

A great example, you know, we're number one in coconut oil in spec oils. Right? An area where less competition, we're number one. We're launching into liquid coconut for the first time in the second half of the year. 25% of households only use coconut oil, so it's an untapped opportunity for continued growth. So when you talk about sort of where does that growth sit, it's really finding those growth pockets and being close to the consumer and unlocking that with innovation, and renovation. When it comes to price cuts, here's what I'd say. I mean, price is relative to the value that you deliver.

And what we've consistently seen, and I think you see this broadly across all categories, is that price relative to value. So when we're bringing innovation or we're bringing and we're seeing that added value come into the product, we're seeing an ability to, you know, sustain price or even price up. So again, the key is not so much about, you know, decreasing prices, increasing prices, it's really about what's the value that we're bringing and what's the consumer willing to pay for that value.

John Baumgartner: Okay. Thanks for that. And then, for Lee, in terms of the potential or, I guess, likelihood of additional asset sales from here, are there a cost basis or tax considerations or any other factors that might limit your degree of flexibility in divesting certain businesses?

Lee Boyce: There are no concerning tax considerations at this point.

John Baumgartner: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Lazar with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Andrew Lazar: Great. Thanks so much. Good morning.

Alison Lewis: Hey, Andrew.

Andrew Lazar: You mentioned sequential improvement. Expectation in the fiscal second half. And obviously, you also announced the divestiture of Snacks, which is expected to close fairly soon. Much of the weakness in fiscal first half was, of course, related to Snacks, so I'm curious if you also expect sequential improvement in the fiscal second half sort of on a pro forma basis. And then any thoughts or help on how we should think about the potential magnitude of such improvement?

Alison Lewis: Yeah. So I think we talked in the first part of the call a little bit about sequential improvement in our international segment. We saw that from first quarter to second quarter and we expect that to continue in the international segment not only driven by the innovation that we're putting into the market it is significant. We also cycle the Ella's challenges with the broader sort of industry and category in May of 2026. So that's going to definitely, definitely help. In North America, we also expect sequential improvement as we look to from first half to second half. We saw that actually in our tea business.

If you look at Q1 to Q2, we see that pick up with the rest of our businesses as we launch innovation. So when you think about our yogurt business, the doing very well. We continue to expand our single-serve Greek gods yogurt, which is driving a lot of incrementality, about percent incremental to the business and almost 100% or the category and almost 100% incremental to our business. When you look at our Earth's Best business, we are launching seven SKUs in the big kids snacks area. That's an area we have not been in the past. So we're launching bites, we're launching Waze, we're launching Sticks.

All of those things have added protein, have added fiber, and so they really play into where the market is moving. So again, the sequential improvement comes from that innovation, we also see the full realization of the pricing actions we've taken. As you know, pricing actions have been rolling in across baby, across tea, across meal prep. As we executed the first half, in the second half, we see the full benefit of that, along with we'll continue to tighten up sort of our promo efficiency and effectiveness. So definitely, we are looking to drive sequential improvement first half to second half overall, and we have a lot of activities.

I guess our five actions to win help drive that.

Lee Boyce: Yeah. And I just building on that a little bit, you know, we expect our margins in the second half to improve. The reasons Alison mentioned. I mean, RGM, you know, we did have some impact and we talked about it in the second quarter on manufacturing on absorption. We expect to get improvements in our manufacturing footprint continue to drive productivity reducing some of our waste as well. So we expect to see that as we move through. So we expect to see an improving margin profile as well.

Andrew Lazar: Okay. Great. And then just regarding stranded costs, call out the $20 to $25 million on an annual basis. Obviously, you're gonna do what you can to mitigate that as soon as you can. But, I guess, in the near term, I mean, should we think about EBITDA being impacted for a period of time when the deal closes because of the stranded costs? And does the four times pro forma leverage include or exclude the stranded costs?

Lee Boyce: Thank you. Yes. So we do I mean, the pro forma leverage did include some of the stranded cost and then some of the other benefits as we've taken out. Moving forward, I mean, will be some short-term pressure with the stranded cost, but we do have a very detailed plan to get those out in a short period of time. We said the six to twelve month period. So, it is something again, there's a number of elements. It's primarily in the SG&A side, a little bit in our distribution and warehousing network. But we have action plans to get those out.

So you got I'd say you would see some pressure in the first quarter, but that would dissipate as we execute those actions. Very, very quickly. Thank you.

Operator: Again, if you would like to ask a question, press 1. And your next question comes from the line of Anthony Vendetti with Maxim Group. Please go ahead.

Anthony Vendetti: Thank you. Yeah. So just to know you gave us the percentages of the snack business relative to overall into North America. If we had a look at the last either the last twelve months or fiscal year 2025, what was the actual revenue contribution from the Snack business?

Lee Boyce: We gave it as was it 38% of the total of the total North America number.

Anthony Vendetti: Okay. Did the is that was that business I know you said that there was I think the gross margin on that business was twenty-eight point six. Not that far off from what you're look No. No. No. Sorry.

Lee Boyce: Sorry. Just one correction there. That gross margin was ex the Snacks business. So the Snacks business was extremely dilutive to that. So that's why we wanted to give you x the snacks business.

Anthony Vendetti: Got it. Okay. Good. That's helpful. And then if you know, in terms of I know the first question was you know, what drove you to this. Was this was this sale you know, pressured by the debt by your bank group? Did the bank group sign off on it? You know? And if there if the bank group wasn't involved you think you would have spent more time trying to turn it around? Or maybe just give us a little bit color on what drove the sale right now.

Lee Boyce: Yeah. It definitely pressured by the bank, it was done. I mean, we talked about I think it was made. We kicked it off. We had a strategic review process, and where we've strategically in a position with the right to win within that category and how did it fit within the rest of our portfolio. So that's really what drove the decision. You know, it felt like with the acquirer, they've got a better position to drive that moving forward. So not pressured by the bank group, no.

Alison Lewis: Yeah. And I would say, Anthony, I mean, you know, look, obviously, this is public now with the team. We couldn't talk to, you know, the team in North America much about what we were doing. As the team looks at sort of the potential of the business with the three flagship categories I noted plus, you know, selective opportunities in meal prep, they're excited. They're excited because the financial profile is such that they can put a lot more focus against these. They know there's growth in these businesses. They're gonna be given an opportunity to unlock that growth. So, again, simplification is our first action to win.

We have to engage in ruthless complexity reduction across our business and that was a very smart way to do that given the capabilities that are required to win in Snacks, which I would argue are not capabilities that are at the heart of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s strength. Given it's an impulse category and fundamentally a demand creation category.

Anthony Vendetti: Okay. Great. And then one last follow-up on the meal prep business because that is one of the fastest growing categories within grocery stores. Maybe give us a little bit more color on the plan there. Is it gonna be more frozen, refrigerated? And just an idea of how you're gonna build that out? Thank you.

Alison Lewis: Yeah. You're right. Meal prep is actually an exciting area, and as we've sort of we're looking at how do we put some additional focus against that business without the snacks business in North America. We're looking at out our pipeline related to Maranatha. You heard me talk about liquid coconut oil on Spectrum. 25% of households only using coconut oil, and we're number one right now. But we don't have a liquid product. That's another great example. So we will absolutely look at ways we can unleash the opportunity within meal prep as we go forward because we know it's a growth category. And when 38% of your business is in snacks and it requires impulse category like capabilities.

You find that a disproportionate amount of human resources are spent there. We now have time to spend it against some of the other great opportunities that exist in our portfolio.

Anthony Vendetti: Okay. And I would just like to conclude with congratulations on the permanent appointment as CEO, Alison.

Alison Lewis: Thank you very much. Continue to be energized by it.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Jon Andersen with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Jon Andersen: Morning. Thanks for the question. I was wondering if you could help us just with kind of the cadence in the baby and kids business, there are, I guess, a couple of other transitory events that are affecting organic growth in that business. You've cited the first one as being pipeline associated with the Earth Balance relaunch last year. And then just kind of the industry-wide challenges in Wet Baby in The UK, can you remind us UK. You know, the timing of those?

When will those be cycled or kind of out in the base, if you will, and do you do you kind of expect post that the baby and kid business is in a position in aggregate to grow? Thanks.

Alison Lewis: Yeah. So I'll talk about The UK first and Ella's. So the BBC Panorama documentary came out in early May of last year. And so we do start to cycle that drag that has hit the category come Q4 of this year. So you will see, you know, that business return to a much better position and return to growth. We are, as you know, on that business we've been doubling down on marketing. I think I talked in our last call about sort of a new marketing campaign that's getting very good response that we are also doubling down on our innovation. So in the back half, in Ella's, we have 10 new snacks SKUs going in.

We have new meal stage four, so older kids sort of meals going in. And then we have the nutty blend, which is a combination of nuts and fruits and vegetables. So, again, lots of innovation to continue to drive that category, and Ella's does remain the number one in the category overall. And is the pioneer in sets the standard for organic baby in the category. So again, once we cycle that, we have confidence that again, that business, you'll see a return to growth.

As it relates to the North America business, I think we've talked quite a bit that we're in a tale of two cities where we've got good growth double-digit growth, strong double-digit growth in our Earth's Best snack, in business, and we'll continue to drive that with the innovation we have coming in, in the back half of the year. On our cereal business, the same thing. Mid single-digit growth, strong business. Again, looking at innovation to continue to drive that. When it comes to our formula business, this is the last big cycle this quarter with the last big cycle that we see, so we should get to a more normalized place.

Although I will tell you that formula is an incredibly competitive category. You have a lot of new players in, and Earth's Best has been working hard to really rebuild sort of the trust credentials that it always had as well as engage in very targeted recruitment-based marketing through things like Earth's Besties, as well as some of the registry programs with our retailers. So again, we have more work to do on our formula business, but the cycles we get over. As it relates to our pouch business, sort of our other challenged area, I mean that's another example where hypercompetitive in the pouch business a lot of the pouch business moving to refrigerated.

And so you're seeing sort of a sea change and a shift in that category overall. We will still be cycling some exits of that business as we look to we talked to you, I think, our last earnings call about the 30% SKU reduction in North America. We continue to drive that. A chunk of that SKU reduction does actually hit our pouch business as we look to really again build a focused power core of sort of hero SKUs in our wet baby food business. So again, we've got great strength in a couple of segments, and we'll continue to drive those hard.

And we're working to stabilize the other two segments with some cycles that we get through as we move through the remainder of the year.

Jon Andersen: That's thanks for the color. That's helpful. Makes sense to focus on the area where you have the strongest differentiation. One follow-up to Andrew's question just on stranded overhead. I just want to make sure, when you talk about North America gross margins, being in the thirties post on a pro forma basis and EBITDA margin double digit or double digit. Is that after the work down of the stranded overhead costs, or is it, you know, kinda right out of the gates?

Lee Boyce: Oh, no. That's a good question. It is after the work down of the stranded overhead impact. So again, that's why we've emphasized and we have action plans to do take those out on the kind of a short-term basis, moving very aggressively. But it is up to that work down. That's right. So just again, for modeling purposes, it would be I guess, prudent might be the word to assume, you know, there's gonna be kind of a $5 to $6 million overhead stranded overhead headwind per quarter until those are worked down.

Jon Andersen: That's the way it would work. Yes. It would be about, yeah, $5.05 $5 million, you know, a quarter, 5 to 6. But, again, we would be taking actions, you know, to quickly kind of work that down as fast as possible.

Jon Andersen: Understood. Okay. Thank you so much.

Operator: That concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Alison Lewis, CEO, for closing remarks.

Alison Lewis: Great. Well, thank you, everyone, for joining today. I'll just reaffirm our confidence in the direction that we're taking. This quarter represented a really pivotal step for us as we began to execute our strategic review with the Director of Snacks. We're focusing our portfolio for growth. We're improving sort of our overall financial profile as we go forward. And strengthening our operational health while they continue to drive out costs and enhance our overall cash delivery. And I would say, you know, we're attacking the challenges head-on. Certainly, business is in transformation, and turnaround, but we see bright spots and, we'll continue to drive those bright spots as we action our five actions to win.

So thanks for joining us today.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.

Should you buy stock in Hain Celestial Group right now?

Before you buy stock in Hain Celestial Group, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Hain Celestial Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $443,299!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,136,601!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 914% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 9, 2026.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Related Articles

KeyAI