By Mike Scarcella
WASHINGTON, March 20 (Reuters) - Elon Musk on Friday convinced a Texas appeals court to reject a defamation lawsuit that claimed the billionaire spread lies on his social media platform X, suggesting that a college student participated in an extremist group's street brawl.
The Third District Texas Court of Appeals in Austin reversed a lower court ruling that had allowed the lawsuit by plaintiff Benjamin Brody to move ahead. The appeals court found that Musk's post on the social media platform X that was allegedly related to Brody was a protected statement of opinion.
Musk’s lawyers, Alex Spiro and John Bash, in a statement on Friday said they were pleased with the court’s ruling.
Mark Bankston, an attorney for Brody, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Brody’s lawsuit, filed in 2023, alleged Musk falsely suggested in a post on X that Brody took part in a violent Oregon street brawl in June of that year involving a neo-Nazi group.
Brody claimed that users on X misidentified him as a participant, and that Musk amplified that misinformation in a post that said, “Looks like one is a college student (who wants to join the govt).” Brody asserts that the reference was about him.
The lawsuit accused Musk of “astonishingly reckless conduct” and sought more than $1 million in damages.
Musk, who had denied any wrongdoing, countered that his X post was not "of and concerning" Brody, and that it was "not a verifiable statement of fact but rather one of nonactionable opinion."
The appeals court said Musk’s comment did not mention Brody by name.
“We believe a reasonable reader of Musk’s comment who had not seen the earlier tweets — even a reader who was familiar with Brody — would not have concluded that Musk’s comment was referring to Brody,” the appeals court said.
The court also said, “it is a matter of common knowledge, we think, that Twitter posts were not known for rigorous factual accuracy.” Twitter, now called X, “was a platform known for free-flowing debate and the expression of uninhibited opinions,” the panel said.
The case is Elon Musk v. Benjamin Brody, 3rd Court of Appeals, Texas, No. 03-24-00392-CV.
For Musk: Alex Spiro and John Bash of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
For Brody: Mark Bankston of Farrar & Ball
Read more:
Musk appeal calls defamation lawsuit over extremist street brawl 'baseless'
Elon Musk lawyer Spiro avoids sanctions as defamation lawsuit proceeds
Musk questioned in defamation lawsuit over X post about street brawl