FCPT 2026년 3분기 실적 발표 콘퍼런스 콜: 사상 최대 인수 및 1억 달러 규모 자사주 매입

핵심 요약

• 3분기 주당 FFO는 0.46달러로 전년 동기 대비 2.9% 증가했습니다. 현금 임대료 수익은 13.7% 증가한 7,520만 달러를 기록했습니다.
• FCPT는 이번 분기 동안 현금 캡레이트 6.6%, GAAP 캡레이트 7.1%에 120개 자산을 3억 2,600만 달러에 인수했습니다. 연간 누적 인수액은 역대 최대치인 4억 1,000만 달러에 달했습니다.
• 임대율은 99.5%를 기록했으며, FCPT는 3분기 기본 임대료의 99.7%를 수금했습니다. 실적을 공시한 포트폴리오 대부분의 임대료 보상배율은 5.3배였습니다.
• 더든은 FCPT의 임대료 감면이나 자본 출자 없이 2027년 만기 예정인 올리브 가든 및 롱혼 스테이크하우스 임대 계약 100%와 2028년 만기 예정 계약 수건을 연장했습니다.
• 이사회는 FCPT의 첫 1억 달러 규모 자사주 매입 프로그램을 승인했습니다. 경영진은 자사주 매입이 밸류에이션에 민감하게 진행될 것이며 단기적으로 주요 자본 배치 주안점이 될 가능성이 높다고 밝혔습니다.
• FCPT는 2026년 현금 판관비(G&A) 가이던스를 1,920만 달러에서 1,970만 달러로 유지했으며, 해당 범위의 하단에 가까운 실적을 기록할 것으로 예상했습니다.

주요 재무 데이터

사업 및 영업 실적

의료 리테일 부문은 미션 펫 헬스(Mission Pet Health) 자산 102개를 인수하며 3분기 투자 활동을 견인했습니다. FCPT는 또한 첫 D&W 그로서리(D&W Grocery) 자산과 드릴링 툴스 인터내셔널(Drilling Tools International) 경공업 제조 시설을 포함해 레스토랑, 정비 서비스 및 기타 부문에서 거래를 완료했습니다.

포트폴리오 다각화는 지속되었습니다. 더든은 현금 임대료의 40%를 차지한 반면, 42%는 캐주얼 다이닝 이외의 부문에서 발생했습니다. 의료 리테일이 16%, 정비 서비스가 13%, 패스트푸드(QSR)가 10%를 차지했습니다.

경영진은 미션 펫 헬스 자산의 임대료 보상배율이 6배 이상이라고 밝혔습니다. FCPT의 3대 레스토랑 브랜드도 최근 매출 성장을 기록했습니다. 올리브 가든은 1%, 롱혼 스테이크하우스는 6.8%, 칠리스는 10.1% 증가했습니다.

임대 활동은 견조한세를 유지했습니다. FCPT는 옵션 행사, 신규 계약 또는 변경 계약을 통해 2026년 만기 예정인 임대 계약 43건 중 39건을 연장했습니다. 나머지 4개 자산이 연환산 기본 임대료에서 차지하는 비중은 0.2% 미만이었습니다.

자금 조달 측면에서 FCPT는 4월 이후 6억 달러 규모의 신규 기간대출을 체결했으며, 이는 4억 1,000만 달러의 추가 부채를 의미합니다. 대차대조표 부채의 40% 가까이가 4%에서 5% 미만 사이의 표면이율로 5년에서 7년 만기로 설정되거나 연장되었습니다. 또한 회사는 미인출 상태인 3억 5,000만 달러 규모의 회전한도대출을 보유하고 있습니다.

FCPT는 8월부터 월간 배당금을 지급하기 시작했으며, 이어서 4분기 배당금을 3.5% 인상했습니다.

경영진 가이던스

FCPT는 2026년 현금 판관비 가이던스를 1,920만 달러에서 1,970만 달러로 재확인했습니다. 경영진은 실적이 해당 범위의 하단에 가까울 것으로 예상하고 있습니다.

회사는 인수 가이던스를 제공하지 않습니다. 경영진은 인수 수익률이 FCPT의 자본 비용을 초과하는지 여부에 따라 투자 활동이 계속 결정될 것이라고 밝혔습니다.

FCPT는 미인출 기간대출 한도 잔액 4,000만 달러와 보유 현금을 사용해 12월 만기 예정인 5,000만 달러 규모의 사모사채를 상환할 계획입니다. 해당 사모사채를 제외하면 2028년 2월 이전에 만기가 도래하는 부채는 총 부채의 5% 미만인 7,500만 달러에 불과합니다.

리스크 및 관전 포인트

경영진은 외부 자산의 캡레이트가 FCPT의 자본 비용 대비 전반적으로 너무 낮아 품질 기준을 충족하는 투자에 대한 스프레드가 미미하거나 음수를 기록하고 있다고 밝혔습니다. 캡레이트가 상승하긴 했으나 부채 및 자기자본의 가격 재조정을 상쇄하기에는 역부족이었습니다.

레버리지는 FCPT가 제시한 목표 범위인 5.0배~6.0배의 상단에 근접했습니다. 경영진은 레버리지를 낮추거나 자사주 매입 자금을 마련하기 위한 잠재적 자본 조달 원천으로 자산 매각, 합작법인(JV), 내부 창출 현금 흐름을 꼽았습니다.

3분기 실적에는 중단된 거래 비용 약 10만 달러와 일회성 오클라호마 주세 정산 비용 약 10만 달러가 포함되었습니다. 특정 신용 공여 비용도 해당 분기 동안 비용 처리되었습니다.

9월 30일 기준 부채의 85%가 고정금리였지만, 경영진은 현재의 조달 비용으로 인해 추가 인수의 매력도가 떨어질 수 있음을 인정했습니다. 또한 FCPT는 언제든지 자사주 매입 프로그램을 중단하거나 종료할 수 있는 재량권을 유지하고 있습니다.

애널리스트 Q&A 주요 내용

• 더든 계약 연장: 경영진은 임대 연장이 포트폴리오 패키지로 협상된 것이 아니라 기존 계약 조건에 따라 행사된 것임을 분명히 했습니다. 더든은 각 자산을 개별적으로 평가했으며, FCPT는 임대료 감면이나 자본 출자를 제공하지 않았습니다.
• 자사주 매입: 경영진은 단기적으로 자사주 매입이 시작될 수 있으며, 밸류에이션 및 인수, 부채 감축, 유동성 보존과의 비교 평가에 따라 향후 자사주 매입이 주요 주안점이 될 것으로 예상된다고 밝혔습니다.
• 자산 매각 및 합작법인: FCPT는 개별 자산에 대한 역제안 문의를 정기적으로 받고 있습니다. 경영진은 조만간 매각이 완료될 수 있으며, 잠재적 합작법인은 사모 시장 파트너에게 자산을 출자하거나 매각하고 그 대금을 주당가치 제고에 기여하는 자사주 매입에 활용하는 방식이 될 수 있다고 밝혔습니다. 확정된 거래는 없습니다.
• 인수 환경: FCPT는 미션 펫 헬스 거래 이후 파이프라인을 적극적으로 축소했습니다. 경영진은 엄선된 전략적 인수를 계속 평가 중이나 매도자의 가격 조정이 높아진 자본 비용을 상쇄할 만큼 이루어지지 않았다고 밝혔습니다.
• 장기적 포지셔닝: 경영진은 미션 펫 헬스 인수, 대차대조표 대응 조치 및 기업 경비의 철저한 관리가 2027년과 2028년을 향한 FCPT의 입지를 잘 구축해주고 있다고 밝혔습니다. 이는 경영진의 정성적 견해일 뿐 공식적인 실적 가이던스는 아닙니다.
• 웬디스 익스포저: 경영진은 FCPT의 웬디스 익스포저가 유의미하지 않은 수준이며 해당 매장을 극소수만 보유하고 있다고 설명했습니다.

실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 전문

전체 실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 녹취록

경영진 발표

Operator

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to Four Corners Property Trust Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now hand the conference over to Patrick Wernig, CFO. Please go ahead.

Patrick Wernig

Thank you, Lucas. During the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements, which are based on our beliefs and assumptions. Actual results will be affected by known and unknown factors that are beyond our control or our ability to predict. Our assumptions are not a guarantee of future performance and some will prove to be incorrect. For a more detailed description of some potential risks, please refer to our SEC filings, which can be found at fcpt.com. All the information presented on the call is current as of today, October 29, 2026. In addition, reconciliation to non-GAAP financial measures presented on this call, such as FFO and AFFO, can be found in the company's supplemental report.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Bill.

William Lenehan

Good morning, and apologies for the technical difficulties. Following my initial remarks on our Q3 results and the state of the market, Patrick will comment on our investment activities for the quarter and current capital position. 2026 has been a banner year for FCPT. Year-to-date, we have acquired a record volume of $410 million of properties at a blended 6.6% cash cap rate and 7.2% GAAP cap rate. Over the past 12 months, we've acquired $505 million of properties. Despite the record volume for FCPT, we have remained highly consistent with the investment characteristics that have long defined FCPT strategy, namely, low basis properties, conservative rents, strong store level profitability and leading tenant operators. We fully funded the volume this quarter with 2 recently closed term loans that feature coupons in the mid-4% to low 5% range, utilizing our debt capacity generating spreads of over 200 basis points as compared to historic investment yields. We also updated our dividend policy to monthly payments beginning in August and subsequently increased the dividend by 3.5% for the fourth quarter.

Finally, we were excited to announce a few weeks ago that Darden extended 100% of all Olive Garden LongHorn leases maturing in 2027, along with the early extension of a handful of 2028 lease maturities. These properties represent the first extension decision by Darden since FCPT spin-off back in 2015. We note that the extensions do not require rent reductions or capital contributions from FCPT, and Darden's rents will continue to increase by 1.5% annually. To clarify, these are individual leases where the tenant made the decision in each and every case to extend under contractual terms. We also note that we've continued to significantly diversify. Darden is now just 40% of cash rent and 42% of our rents come from sectors outside of casual dining. This includes medical retail now at 16%, automotive service at 13% and quick service at 10%.

Now turning to the current acquisition environment, which has changed a great deal in recent months. Investors consistently ask us how this will impact our pipeline efforts. Our answer is that since inception, FCPT has been consistent in modulating acquisitions relative to our cost of capital. This happened most recently when rates rose in 2023. At that point, rising rates made it difficult to invest accretively. And so we subsequently stopped nearly all acquisitions and aggressively moderated additions to our pipeline from late '23 through mid-'24. Basically, we didn't buy anything. Once our cost of capital improved, we hit the gas with vigor and subsequently invested nearly $1 billion in new accretive real estate investments from 2024 through today.

Capital allocation discipline is built into how we operate. We do not provide acquisition guidance. Our team's incentives are not tied to volume. This alignment lets us grow when it's accretive and stay patient when it isn't. It's times like these when having clear rental frameworks designed in nonturbulent times makes all the difference to investors. Other companies may say they will modulate guidance in the face of weakening spreads, but we actually have an established track record of pausing investments. Said simply and to be clear, FCPT's management will not sacrifice our shareholders' interest to simply pursue scale. As for the state of the company in this turbulent environment, we believe that we are very well positioned to weather continued macro headwinds. First, our granular acquisition strategy has created a highly fungible portfolio among the lowest per property value at risk within our industry. Our lease renewal rates are very high. Occupancy remains well over 99% and our rent coverage in Q3 was 5.3x for the majority of our portfolio that reports this figure. Our rent coverage remains best coverage within our industry and what we believe is a reflection of our conservative and analytical underwriting.

Second, our 3 core restaurant brands, Olive Garden, LongHorn and Chili's continue to outperform their peers and grew sales in the most recent quarter by 1%, 6.8% and 10.1%, respectively. The value proposition these restaurant brands offer their customers is tremendous, and they have shown through consistent historical growth in many different macroeconomic cycles. Additionally, our Mission Pet health properties have coverage levels above 6x. This is the exact type of portfolio you would want in a turbulent backdrop. Third, we have very limited credit loss over our 11-year history. That result isn't an accident. We are aligned with leading operators in our chosen sectors and avoid experience net lease sectors and over-rented properties. We try to keep it simple by acquiring low basis fungible properties in what we believe are e-commerce resistant sectors.

The last point I'd like to touch on is yesterday's announcement of our inaugural share repurchase program. Let me go into some detail here on how we are thinking about share repurchases. One of our long-term mental models is our heat meter and the green, yellow and red zones. In FCPT's history, there have just been a handful of times of short-lived red zone windows over the last decade. At the spin during COVID were the 2 prominent ones, where share repurchases would have made true economic sense. We believe the current landscape presents the best opportunity for FCPT share repurchases since our company was founded. As such, our Board has authorized a $100 million share repurchase program. And if conditions can meet our thresholds, then we will seek to utilize it. So let me trace the steps of how we think about this, which is influenced by the writing of Michael Mauboussin on capital allocation. The first decision is whether there are property acquisitions that clearly exceed our cost of capital. Because we are very analytical in assessing the quality of the properties we buy, we can do this step without quality creep. This is where we have been as a company for a significant majority of our existence, but not today. Perhaps cap rates will follow interest rates with a lag. But as of today, we think external cap rates are generally too low and in most instances, investment spreads will be thin to negative for the investments that meet our high-quality thresholds we hold ourselves to. We next make sure we are conservatively levered. We want to make sure our balance sheet is in great shape. Pat has done a terrific job here. We have a few near-term maturities, a largely fixed rate structure, and we remain within our modest target leverage range. Then we make a determination of whether we believe our stock represents a compelling investment opportunity. By this, I mean below where we believe our intrinsic value is. In the final check, we compare the risk-adjusted returns of new acquisitions, debt reduction, liquidity preservation and share repurchases. FCPT has always been price disciplined in where we issue new shares, and this is in an exact same vein, we will seek to be very price disciplined when we buy back shares. We will run this analysis every time we repurchase stock in the market to confirm these conditions are met. It is also worth noting that our program does not require us to buy a certain number of shares and allows us to suspend or terminate the program at any time, i.e., we will be valuation sensitive. Given the lack of tenant issues and our strong confidence in the portfolio, we view FCPT's current stock price as a very compelling investment today. I note that it's public that I personally purchased FCPT stock recently. This does not affect a theoretical exercise for me.

Before handing it back over to Pat, I want to offer a sincere gratitude to Josh Zhang for his contributions to FCPT. Josh joined us way back in 2016 and was instrumental in building our platform. Josh will be leaving FCPT in Q4 to take a personal sabbatical before exploring an entrepreneurial opportunity. He remains a big fan of FCPT as we are of him and is another proud member of our alumni base. We wish him the absolute best. I know I speak for myself, Patrick, the rest of the company, the Board, when I say it's been a pleasure getting to know him professionally and personally. Wherever he ends up, they'll be extremely lucky to have him. Over to you, Patrick.

Patrick Wernig

Thanks, Will. Very well said, and I couldn't agree more. Josh has been a close colleague for a decade and left [ his mark ] FCPT. We're very grateful for his meaningful efforts, which helped us evolve from startup to a seasoned net lease investment vehicle.

Now I'll shift to a review of the Q3 acquisition activity before touching on our balance sheet. In Q3, we acquired 120 properties with a weighted-average lease term of 10 years of $326 million at a 6.6% cash cap rate or 7.1% GAAP cap rate. This quarter was weighted towards medical retail with the previously announced acquisition of 102 Mission Pet Health properties. We also continue to source and execute our regular way investment pipelines in restaurants, automotive service, medical retail and other sectors across 14 distinct transactions in Q3. Those investments included new subsectors for our platform with acquisitions of the D&W Grocery property and the Drilling Tools International light manufacturing facility. In both cases, we've been monitoring these sectors for years and have been waiting for the right opportunities with real estate, credit and pricing quality to fit FCPT standards and investment profile. We'll continue to evaluate investments in these subsectors and expect that over time, we will expand our opportunity set as we build domain expertise.

I note that we did end up killing a handful of deals this quarter as we got more selective or ran into issues during due diligence that we thought would impact the long-term economics. That results in net deal cost of around $100,000, which hits AFFO. We don't [indiscernible] up deals, but are more focused on avoiding long-term problems and deals that don't meet our return thresholds.

Before I move on from acquisitions, I'd like to commend our investment and legal teams as well as our accounting and property management teams who ran an effective and efficient diligence process and integrated more properties in Q3 than we have historically done in the full year, really speaks to the strength of the platform and the capacity we've built at FCPT.

Now over to the balance sheet. As Bill highlighted, since April, we've closed on a total of $600 million of new term loans, which represents an incremental $410 million of debt with nearly 40% of our balance sheet put in place or extended 5 to 7 years, 4% to below 5% coupons. $40 million remains undrawn on the $400 million term loan, which we intend to fund by the end of the year. Additionally, we are able to lower term loan spreads by 5 to 10 basis points annually on $800 million of outstanding loans for annual savings of approximately $450,000. We are fully undrawn on our $350 million revolver and leverage for the Q3 annualized period was 6x. Our stated leverage range remains 5 to 6x and on a run rate basis, we remain a bit below that 6x upper bound of the range.

On our debt maturity schedule, we just had a $50 million private note coming due in December, which is about 3% of our total outstanding debt. We plan to repay that private note at the maturity date. We earmarked funds to do so. Principally, we expect to address the maturity with $40 million remaining undrawn term loan and cash on hand. Excluding the December note, we have just $75 million or less than 5% of our total debt coming due prior to February 2028. Our staggered debt maturity schedule is specifically designed to avoid facing a significant refinancing loss in any given year. Looking at the landscape today, a great benefit to have very minimal refinancing headwinds. In the same vein, we have very little floating rate exposure with 85% of our debt balance fixed as of 9/30. We included a detailed hedging schedule in our supplemental that also has the lock rate on our term loan, which is currently 3.1%.

Now I'd like to go through a few earnings highlights for the quarter. Q3 cash rental income was $75.2 million, representing 13.7% growth versus prior year. Annualized cash base rent for leases in place as of quarter end was $292.8 million, and our weighted-average 5-year annual cash rent escalator is 1.6%.

Cash G&A expense was $4.7 million for the quarter, representing 6.3% of cash rental income compared to 6.5% for the prior year. This improvement in operating leverage illustrates our continued efforts at achieving efficient growth and the benefits of our rising scale. Overall, Q3 FFO per share was $0.46, representing 2.9% growth versus prior year, a bit of a noisy quarter versus our usual results because of the significant acquisition volume and debt refinancing. We also recognized a onetime catch-up charge from the disputed state tax assessed several years ago and debt deal costs in several transactions that we killed during the quarter.

Our fixed charge coverage ratio remains a very healthy 4x as of quarter end. Following our Q3 results, we are affirming our cash G&A guidance for 2026 of $19.2 million to $19.7 million, but noting we expect to be at the bottom of the range. On the leasing front, the team continues to achieve remarkably strong results. We continued to make progress on the 2026 lease maturities with 39 of the 43 leases already extended by option release or amendment. The remaining 4 properties combined for less than 0.2% of ABR. We are actively negotiating with current and prospective tenants on the remaining properties in the normal course of managing our portfolio. Our occupancy remains strong at 99.5% today. We collected 99.7% of base rent for Q3.

Finally, last quarter, we did not see any material changes to our collectibility or credit reserves. Our best-in-class portfolio represents an opportunity for differentiated source of capital in the form of dispositions. In the past, we've had periods where we were more active with dispositions than not in recent years. We have a slide in our presentation posted yesterday that details our strong disposition track record. We view this as another tool to unlock value not reflected in our public valuation. Depending on pricing and execution, dispositions could be another potential capital source. We regularly receive strong reverse inquiry offers for our properties. And in this environment, we plan to be more responsive to those opportunities.

With that, I'll turn it back over to Lucas for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo.

질의응답

James Feldman

So congratulations on getting the first tranche of the Darden leases executed 100%. You had mentioned that those were all one-off negotiations or individual leases. Can you just talk about -- as we think about the future tranches, can you just talk about what kind of the negotiating points were to get all of those done? Is there anything as we think about how they might play out for the next tranches that were sticking points as you're negotiating? Or does this give you confidence that it will go pretty smoothly for the rest?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think negotiation is probably too strong of a word, Jamie. We had to help administer the paperwork on the extensions, but they were essentially extended -- not extension, they were extended in -- as contractually they notified us, and it's just working with them, so it doesn't all happen the last minute, just managing the paperwork. But these are very well-covered leases. These buildings have been in operation since I was a child by and large. And that's very, very similar to all the rest of our portfolio.

Patrick Wernig

I think the point we made on the individual leases is that because it's not a master lease, Darden had the opportunity to go through and evaluate each property. And so it makes us feel even better than you might think just saying that, each and every one of those cases, affirm the store as something that they wanted to remain committed to and continue to operate because they're profitable.

James Feldman

Okay. And then with leverage close to the high end of your range, assuming that the cost of capital, at least the equity markets doesn't cooperate anytime soon, how do you think about maybe getting that leverage lower to get yourself back in a position to acquire? Or do you just wait this out? Would you consider asset sales or anything else to raise capital?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think Patrick made the comments at the end of his remarks that we have very liquid currency in our buildings. There are a lot of demand for them. We get reverse inquiries on a daily basis. So we have that. We have -- we could do a joint venture, free up capital, incremental free cash flow is substantial at the scale of our business. We have a lot of avenues to create cash to reduce leverage, keep it within the range and still buy back shares.

James Feldman

But I guess in terms of like timing, how patient would you be for things to come your way before you start taking action?

William Lenehan

If by taking actions, you're referring to buying back stock, I think we would be doing that in the near term.

James Feldman

No, sorry. Raising third-party capital, you mentioned third-party [ capital ].

William Lenehan

Yes, I think the process of selling buildings is a pretty well-worn path. We've showed in our presentation, we've done that a number of times. So that can be done in the near term.

Patrick Wernig

Yes. And I think I would just point out that I hope it's not lost that the timing of when we raised that debt capital this summer was pretty fortuitous around a 5% or lower coupon rate, that's close to where the U.S. Treasury is today. So I think we timed that well. It was accretive -- highly accretive at that point. And when we think about the flexibility of having lower leverage, you have to make sure that the pricing of that debt today still makes sense, right? And so if rates have moved significantly since then, it's to our benefit that we acted when we did and didn't hold on to that capacity.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Spenser Glimcher with Green Street.

Spenser Glimcher

Look, on the transaction front, I know you guys have hit the brakes just given kind of the current environment and your cost of capital. But can you just talk about the makeup of deals you're seeing in terms of industries or credit looking to transact? And then have you seen any capitulation from sellers in terms of -- just signs of willingness to move cap rates higher?

William Lenehan

Yes. So we actively managed our pipeline down post the Mission Pet Health acquisition. We are seeing in the market that buyers are actively retrading in a substantial way. The few remaining assets we had in our pipeline have attractive cap rates. And what we're seeing today is cap rates going up, but not nearly as much as rates have moved and cost of debt has moved. So as Pat mentioned, we locked in a very substantial amount of debt before this move, which is very advantageous because incremental investments, if you're funding it with a typical mix of equity and debt, both your equity cost of capital is challenged across our industry as stock prices have gone down and your debt cost is challenged. So we are seeing higher cap rates. There are some selective things to do, which we're very active on. But by and large, it hasn't reacted enough to compensate where your sources of capital have repriced.

Spenser Glimcher

Okay. And then on the divestment front, it sounds like, obviously, you're in the early innings of this process. But can you provide some color on what types of assets would be kind of top of mind to sell? And would this be purely opportunistic? Or would there be any room for portfolio management just keeping in mind of how high rent coverage and how superior tenant health is in the portfolio?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think it's primarily driven by how attractive the use of capital is in share repurchase. So that's very price dependent, as you might be aware. But I think the way we think about Spenser is very similar to a report that Green Street did many years ago, I believe it was in 2014 on the arbitrage between the NAV of your company and the value of assets that you can sell. So I think that you guys wrote the script to that game plan.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Goldsmith with UBS.

Michael Goldsmith

Maybe we can dive a little bit deeper into just how you use? What capital you do have, right? We're talking about share repurchases. You mentioned buying down debt. And then also, it sounds like some deals were killed. So it seems like you were also willing to transact in the market. So can you just talk about at what levels do each of those look attractive and your thought process about approaching each of them?

William Lenehan

Yes. So we have seen some acquisitions that are highly strategic where we're adding an asset to already existing master lease or we're getting very attractive pricing because we know a tenant. But by and large, our focus going forward is going to be share repurchase. And for obvious reasons, we're not going to draw a line in the sand of what that value is. But we think where our stock price is right now is very attractive.

Michael Goldsmith

Got it. And then also, you did mention the potential of doing joint ventures. So I just want to get a sense of what that looks like. Is that selling assets into a venture with someone else and then freeing up some capital to do activity in the market? Or just trying to get a sense of what you would be looking to get out of a JV arrangement?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think you nailed that. We have a very well-developed acquisition apparatus. We are -- see a lot of deal flow, and there are parties that contact us weekly about partnering with us to buy net lease assets. On the private side, net lease is very, very popular right now and a number of new platforms have started and perhaps have raised more capital than they have acquisition opportunities. So I think our platform is very attractive there, and it's a very efficient way, as you mentioned, to free up capital to make accretive share repurchases.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Wes Golladay with Baird.

Wesley Golladay

Being that you have more liquid assets and equity price is more volatile than the private market, are you okay having a timing mismatch buying shares first and going a little above your target leverage level?

William Lenehan

I don't think -- I'd rather not comment on that, Wes.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Borden with BMO Capital Markets.

Eric Borden

On the reverse inquiries that you're receiving, where are the bids relative to your view of the asset value? And then are buyers still financing and closing at those levels? Are you kind of seeing the same retrading pressures you described on acquisitions?

William Lenehan

I would say that because we haven't sold assets for a couple of years now, we have a number of people who are very specifically interested in an asset that might be in their local market and might be where they have a second home. And we're reassessing those opportunities first. There's also a tax dynamic with bonus depreciation that may end on January 1. So there's a lot of activity in the market right now for assets like gas stations and car washes that benefit from bonus depreciation. We don't have a lot of those, but we do have some.

Eric Borden

Okay. Perfect. And then one for Patrick. Just could you quantify the state tax catch-up and any other nonrecurring items that affected the third quarter? And then as those costs fall away and the recent acquisitions contribute to a full quarter, how should we think about like the underlying earnings run rate heading into 2027? I'm just curious on earnings.

Patrick Wernig

Curious. Yes. So it's a very specific question, very granular. If there's a need to think on it offline on model, I'm happy to do that. I would just say that the state tax issue was unique in that the dispute started during COVID. I think the state -- the specific state, which was Oklahoma, I just took several years to review the complaint that we had about what it was. It wasn't a huge number, call it, approximately $100,000. It's nonrecurring. And the only reason we mentioned it, frankly, is because we usually don't have anything out of the norm. And so I just felt like we should highlight that with moving part of the AFFO figure.

William Lenehan

Yes. There were costs related to our credit facility that in some instances, people might assume were capitalized that were expensed, that also in the quarter. So there were, as we mentioned, a handful of things that made it a little bit more noisy in the quarter than we would have anticipated.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Rich Hightower with Barclays.

Richard Hightower

One on the share repurchases. Just help us understand the arithmetic on how you came up with the $100 million figure. It's some combination, obviously, of free cash flow. There's a lot of other moving parts as well that you've kind of gone through. But just help us understand the buildup to get to that figure.

William Lenehan

Yes, I wouldn't overthink it. It's a number that is self-determined when used, we can reauthorize it with a simple e-mail to our Board. So I wouldn't think too much about it at all.

Richard Hightower

Okay. I will not overthink it. And then secondly, back to the joint venture topic. I know it's obviously very preliminary, but since it's kind of out there for discussion now, is this something that you envision it could be more of a one-off source of equity programmatic? Are you having multiple conversations along those lines? Obviously, we've seen different flavors of the same thing sort of up and down the sector and even broadly across REITs. So just curious for what the thought is there.

William Lenehan

I think at a high level, the demand for net lease in the private market is very strong. And I think it's -- and the stock prices of the public companies are generally weak, ours included. So I think it points that having the flexibility to invest both public and private capital, at least at this moment in time is a valuable thing. And I think it's a good way to free up capital to buy back stock.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Mitch Germain with Citizens Bank.

Mitch Germain

Lots of noise around Wendy's. Is there any exposure in your portfolio with that tenant?

William Lenehan

Not meaningful.

Patrick Wernig

We have a handful of them. I think as Bill said, it's not a meaningful [indiscernible].

William Lenehan

And I would also say, Mitch, we've seen -- and I would by no means expect Wendy's to be problematic, but we have seen some very positive results with QSR brands migrating from [ Midland ] brands to very strong brands because the replacement cost and the drive-through entitlements are super valuable.

Patrick Wernig

I'd point out that to the extent it's useful to you, Mitch, we do have on our website a list of all the properties that we own in the portfolio published. So as a reminder to our investors that that's the resource and transparency that we're trying to provide.

Mitch Germain

Super helpful. I think last question. Bill, you were pretty bullish on -- I'm not asking for guidance. I want to say that, but you were pretty bullish on growth prospects, last quarter, almost frustrating. And you've almost get the full quarter benefit of that bigger Mission transaction this quarter. And I recognize there's just a lot of noise in your numbers here throughout the quarter. But how should we think about kind of the growth prospects of kind of what you've just accomplished over the course of the year and what it could mean for you guys going forward?

William Lenehan

Yes. And I really am looking out not quarter-to-quarter or intra-quarter. I'm looking out for '27 and '28. And I really believe that what we did with our balance sheet, what we did on Mission Pet Health, the -- our sort of ruthlessness on corporate overhead puts us in a really good position for '27 and '28. And if the stock price remains low, our ability to create value by buying back stock makes it even more so.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo.

James Feldman

So you had mentioned potentially JV as a source of capital. I'm just curious if you could provide more color given we're seeing more and more of that across REIT land. How do you think about a potential size? How do you think about the types of assets or types of tenants you'd want to put into those assets? And I guess with some of the Darden extensions, if that makes sense for a JV. But any other color you could provide on what that might look like would be great.

William Lenehan

Yes. I'm not going to negotiate the terms of the JV on our conference call. I would just say that what I said before, which is there's lots of demand for our high-quality portfolio, and there's a lot of value in our platform, and there's a lot of capital switching around in private markets, and we're attuned to that. But the market out there is pretty volatile, and we're certainly not at the stage -- at an advanced stage in those discussions. We will announce it when it's finalized, when and if it's finalized.

James Feldman

Okay. So it sounds like it's not a high priority. It's just an option?

William Lenehan

I wouldn't say that. Next question, operator?

Operator

We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Bill Lenehan for closing remarks.

William Lenehan

Thank you, Lucas. The first 9 months of 2026 have been unprecedented for FCPT. We exceeded our record annual investment volume by completing the largest acquisition in our history and accelerated the diversification of our portfolio. We also executed the first renewal tranche of the expiring Olive Garden LongHorn properties at a 100% renewal rate, demonstrating the durability and strength of the portfolio. And we extended nearly 40% of our balance sheet at an approximately 5% or lower coupon. Finally, we've activated our inaugural share repurchase program. Our portfolio is performing incredibly well with occupancy, rent collections, tenant coverage and leasing outcomes amongst the strongest in net lease. Our consistency has set us up with the tools that we can help create value in any environment. Our team will be at the NAREIT Atlanta Conference in November and the Jefferies Conference in December. We welcome the opportunity to meet in person. Please reach out to either Patrick or myself to coordinate schedules. Thank you.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.