tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
검색

노블 코퍼레이션(NE) 2026년 3분기 실적 발표회: 수주잔고 67억 달러 기록

TradingKeyOct 27, 2026 9:43 PM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
모든 코멘트 보기(0)

노블 코퍼레이션은 2026년 3분기 매출액 6억 8,400만 달러, 조정 EBITDA 2억 1,000만 달러를 기록했습니다. 높은 설비 투자로 인해 잉여현금흐름은 마이너스 4,800만 달러를 기록했으나, 신규 계약 수주로 수주잔고는 67억 달러로 증가했습니다. 2026년 연간 매출액 가이던스는 28억 5,000만~29억 달러, 조정 EBITDA 가이던스는 8억 5,000만~9억 달러로 축소되었으며, 경영진은 4분기 조정 EBITDA가 3분기를 소폭 하회할 것으로 예상하고 있습니다. 또한 노블은 주당 0.50달러의 4분기 배당을 추가 선언하며 주주환원 프로그램을 유지했습니다.

AI 생성 요약

노블 코퍼레이션(NYSE: NE)은 2026년 3분기 매출액 6억 8,400만 달러, 조정 EBITDA 2억 1,000만 달러를 기록했다고 발표했습니다. 높은 설비 투자 수준이 지속되면서 잉여현금흐름은 마이너스 4,800만 달러를 기록한 반면, 신규 계약 수주로 수주잔고는 67억 달러로 증가했습니다.

핵심 요약

  • 2026년 3분기 매출액은 6억 8,400만 달러, 조정 EBITDA는 2억 1,000만 달러, 조정 EBITDA 마진은 28%를 기록했습니다. 조정 EBITDA는 주로 여러 시추선의 계약 간 전환으로 인해 전 분기 대비 5% 감소했습니다.
  • 영업활동 현금흐름은 총 1억 4,400만 달러였으며, 설비 투자(CAPEX) 1억 9,200만 달러로 인해 4,800만 달러의 마이너스 잉여현금흐름이 발생했습니다.
  • 노블은 지난 3개월 동안 약 5억 6,000만 달러 규모의 신규 계약을 수주했습니다. 10월 26일 기준 총 수주잔고는 67억 달러이며, 이 중 약 26억 달러는 2027년 중 매출로 전환될 예정입니다.
  • 회사는 2026년 연간 매출액 가이던스를 28억 5,000만~29억 달러로, 조정 EBITDA 가이던스를 8억 5,000만~9억 달러로 축소했습니다. 경영진은 4분기 조정 EBITDA가 3분기보다 소폭 하회할 것으로 예상하고 있습니다.
  • 노블은 분기 배당금 주당 0.50달러를 지급하고 4분기 배당금으로 주당 0.50달러를 추가 선언하며 주주환원 프로그램을 유지했습니다.
  • 경영진은 2027년 1분기 조정 EBITDA가 2026년 4분기와 비교해 전반적으로 안정적인 수준을 유지한 후, 계약된 선대 용량이 늘어남에 따라 매 분기 의미 있게 증가할 것으로 예상합니다. 2027년 하반기 계약 선대 용량은 이미 상반기보다 약 20% 높은 수준입니다.

주요 재무 데이터

지표2026년 3분기 / 현재 현황변동 내용 및 배경
매출액6억 8,400만 달러연간 가이던스가 이전 전망치 범주의 상단 근처로 축소됨
조정 EBITDA2억 1,000만 달러전 분기 대비 5% 감소
조정 EBITDA 마진28%발표된 비GAAP 마진
영업활동 현금흐름1억 4,400만 달러—
설비 투자(CAPEX)1억 9,200만 달러지속적인 선대 및 프로젝트 투자 포함
잉여현금흐름마이너스 4,800만 달러높아진 설비 투자를 반영함
수주잔고67억 달러2026년 10월 26일 기준
2027년 수주잔고 매출 전환액약 26억 달러고객 정산 매출 및 부대 서비스 제외
분기 배당금주당 0.50달러동일한 수준으로 4분기 배당금 선언

노블 리졸브(Noble Resolve)의 매각은 10월 9일에 완료되어 잔여 대금 4,500만 달러가 유입되었습니다. 노블은 또한 노블 글로브트롯터 II(Noble Globetrotter II)의 3,800만 달러 규모 매각이 2026년 4분기 내 완료될 것으로 예상하고 있습니다. 경영진은 거래 완료 후 해당 시추선이 시추 선대에서 제외될 것이라고 밝혔습니다.

사업 및 운영 실적

3분기 조정 EBITDA 감소는 노블 블랙라이노(Noble BlackRhino), 노블 디스커버러(Noble Discoverer), 노블 벤처러(Noble Venturer), 노블 글로브트롯터 I(Noble Globetrotter I)의 계약 가동 일수 감소를 반영합니다. 이는 7월 브라질 시추선 2척의 가동 재개와 8월 노블 게리 드 수자(Noble Gerry de Souza)의 계약 개시로 일부 상쇄되었습니다.

노블 보이저(Noble Voyager)는 최종 시운전 및 기상 악화 지연으로 인해 당초 계획보다 몇 주 늦어진 9월 말 미국 멕시코만에서 셸(Shell)과의 4년 계약을 시작했습니다. 노블 발리언트(Noble Valiant)와 노블 디스커버러(Noble Discoverer)는 2026년 말경 수리남에서 토탈엔전스(TotalEnergies)의 장기 개발 캠페인에 착수할 예정입니다.

최근 수주한 계약 내역은 다음과 같습니다:

  • 노블 블랙라이노(Noble BlackRhino): 나이지리아에서 토탈엔전스(TotalEnergies)와 체결한 4개 공 시추 계약으로, 수주 내 시작되어 약 150일간 진행될 예정이며 최대 6개 공 추가 옵션이 포함되어 있습니다.
  • 노블 페이 코작(Noble Faye Kozack): 가나에서 툴로우(Tullow)와 체결한 5개 공 시추 계약으로, 2027년 중반 시작 예정이며 예상 기간은 약 250일입니다.
  • 노블 글로브트롯터 I(Noble Globetrotter I): 경량 유정 개보수 작업을 위해 토탈엔전스(TotalEnergies)와 체결한 3년 선대 용량 예약 계약으로, 첫 작업은 2027년 3분기 또는 4분기 앙골라에서 진행될 예정입니다. 그에 앞서 2027년 2분기부터 페루에서 옥시덴탈(Occidental)의 2개 공 탐사 캠페인에 투입될 예정입니다.
  • 노블 블랙호크(Noble BlackHawk): 2027년 4분기에 시작될 것으로 예상되는 우루과이 내 아파치(Apache)와의 1개 공 시추 계약입니다. 예상 기간 50일의 이 계약 금액은 이동/철수, 압력제어시추(MPD) 및 기타 서비스를 제외하고 약 2,500만 달러 규모입니다.
  • 노블 인터셉터(Noble Interceptor): 2027년 중반 DNO 유정 시추 후, 2027년 3분기부터 에코피스크(Ekofisk)에서 코노코필립스(ConocoPhillips)의 약 670일간의 유정 폐구(Plug-and-Abandonment) 프로그램에 투입될 예정입니다.
  • 노블 인트레피드(Noble Intrepid): 2027년 3분기에 시작되어 40~60일간 진행될 것으로 예상되는 올렌(ORLEN)과의 1개 공 시추 계약입니다.

경영진은 시장에 공급된 초수심 시추선 110척 중 109척이 현재 또는 향후 작업에 대한 계약을 완료하여 99%의 계약 가동률을 기록하고 있다고 밝혔습니다. 현재 실제 가동 중인 시추선은 88척으로 2024년 고점보다 10척 적습니다. 최고급 시추선의 최신 용선료는 일당 40만 달러대 중반에서 50만 달러 수준인 것으로 설명되었습니다.

노르웨이 시장 역시 노블에 유리하게 강세를 보이고 있습니다. 회사의 CJ-70 잭업 시추선 5척 중 4척이 노르웨이에서 계약을 맺었으며, 최신 용선료는 작업 방식과 기간에 따라 23만 달러에서 30만 달러 사이입니다. 노블 이노베이터(Noble Innovator)는 아직 계약되지 않은 상태이지만, 경영진은 북해 남부에서 계약을 수주할 것으로 낙관하고 있다고 전했습니다.

경영진 가이던스

가이던스 지표업데이트된 2026년 전망치 범주이전 전망치 범주경영진 코멘트
매출액28억 5,000만~29억 달러28억~29억 달러높아진 고객 정산 매출이 축소된 범위 형성을 뒷받침함
조정 EBITDA8억 5,000만~9억 달러8억 5,000만~9억 2,500만 달러노블 보이저와 노블 발리언트의 계약 개시 지연으로 인해 주로 하단 근처로 축소됨
설비 투자(CAPEX)6억 8,000만~7억 500만 달러6억 1,500만~6억 6,500만 달러증가폭은 주로 높아진 고객 정산 설비 투자를 반영함

고객 정산 설비 투자는 당초 예상했던 2,500만 달러에서 2026년 총 약 6,500만 달러에 달할 것으로 예상됩니다.

경영진은 2027년 1분기 조정 EBITDA가 2026년 4분기와 전반적으로 비슷할 것으로 예상하며, 이후 2027년 잔여 기간 동안 분기별로 의미 있는 성장을 이어갈 것으로 보고 있습니다. 이러한 전망은 2027년 하반기 계약 용량이 상반기보다 약 20% 높다는 점에 기반하며, 연중 추가 계약 기회도 계속 모색하고 있습니다.

노블 클라우제 바흐만(Noble Claus Bachmann)을 제외한 순정상화 설비 투자는 이전에 언급된 3억 달러 후반에서 4억 달러 범위의 상단 수준이 될 것으로 제시되었습니다. 노블 클라우제 바흐만 프로젝트 지출의 절반을 소폭 상회하는 금액이 2027년에 집행될 것으로 예상됩니다. 관련 수익 및 잉여현금흐름 창출 능력이 본격화되기 전인 2027년 중반까지는 선대 투자가 높은 수준을 유지할 것으로 예상됩니다.

리스크 및 주시해야 할 영역

  • 계약 전환과 프로젝트 지연으로 인해 3분기 계약 가동 일수가 감소했습니다. 시운전 및 기상 조건으로 노블 보이저의 가동 개시가 지연되었고, 노블 보이저와 노블 발리언트의 시작 시점이 늦어지면서 연간 EBITDA 가이던스에 영향을 미쳤습니다.
  • 미국 멕시코만은 상대적으로 약세를 보이는 지역 시장으로 유지되고 있으며, 시추선 수가 최근 몇 년 동안 20대 초반에서 10대 중반으로 감소했습니다. 경영진은 2027년 어느 정도 개선될 것으로 기대하지만, 다른 지역으로 이동하는 시추선으로 인해 시추 용량을 다시 유치하기 위한 용선료 상승 압력이 발생할 수 있다고 밝혔습니다.
  • 원자재 가격 상승이 아직 시추 수요의 명확한 증가로 이어지지는 않았습니다. 경영진은 이를 고객의 지속적인 자본 규율과 지정학적 요인으로 인한 단기 유가의 불확실성 때문으로 분석했습니다.
  • 노블 바이킹(Noble Viking), 노블 블랙호크(Noble BlackHawk), 노블 스탠리 라포스(Noble Stanley Lafosse)를 포함한 일부 시추선은 2027년에 미계약 용량이 남아 있습니다. 경영진은 공백을 채우기 위한 일감을 모색하고 있으나 모든 이용 가능 기간에 대한 계약이 아직 확보되지는 않았습니다.
  • 비용 인플레이션이 정상화된 설비 투자 예상치에 영향을 미치고 있으며, 주요 선대 업그레이드로 인해 2027년 중반까지 자금 소모가 지속될 전망입니다.

애널리스트 Q&A 주요 내용

심해 시추 수요: 경영진은 지난 90일 동안 가장 긍정적인 변화를 보인 지역으로 미국 멕시코만과 인도를 꼽았습니다. 노블은 미국 멕시코만에서 2~3개 기회가 확정 단계에 가까워지고 있으며, 인도가 2027년 말과 2028년부터 2~4척의 시추선을 필요로 할 것으로 보고 있습니다.

탐사 전망: 지난 18개월 동안 고객들은 매장량 대체 및 탐사를 점차 강조해 왔습니다. 경영진은 2027년에 와일드캣 탐사가 증가할 수 있으나, 현재 탐사 수주 수준이 노블의 전체 사업 전망을 크게 바꿀 만큼 실질적이지는 않다고 전했습니다. 개발 프로젝트는 2027년 말까지 예상 수요 성장의 주요 동력으로 남아 있습니다.

글로브트롯터 I 수익성: 3년 계약 기간 동안 연간 최소 150일의 가동 일수가 보장되는 유정 개보수 계약입니다. 경영진은 최소 약정 기간 가동 시 현금흐름 손익분기점에 도달할 것으로 보며, 추가 호출 작업(Call-out work)이 추가됨에 따라 마진을 창출할 수 있을 것으로 기대하고 있습니다. 업황이 좋을 경우 가동 일수가 300일에 접근할 수 있으며, 평균적인 결과는 200일대 초반이 될 수 있습니다.

가이아나 용선료: 노블의 가이아나 시추선 용선료는 티어 1(Tier 1) 시추선의 글로벌 시장 가격에 맞춰 협상됩니다. 최근 6개월간 적용될 용선료는 실적 발표 전화회의 약 한 달 전에 결정되었으며, 2027년 1월 1일부터 적용될 예정입니다. 노블은 구체적인 용선료를 공개하지 않습니다.

미계약 시추 용량: 경영진은 동남아시아에서 추가 일감을 확보할 경우 노블 바이킹(Noble Viking)의 2027년 가동률이 약 50%에 달할 수 있다고 밝혔습니다. 노블 블랙호크(Noble BlackHawk)와 노블 블랙라이노(Noble BlackRhino)는 2027년 말과 2028년에 여러 기회가 열려 있으며, 노블 스탠리 라포스(Noble Stanley Lafosse)는 2027년 말 또는 2028년 초 미국 외 지역에서 가동을 재개할 수 있습니다.

선대 투자: 경영진은 2027년 말까지 모든 티어 1 시추선이 압력제어시추(MPD) 능력을 갖출 것으로 예상하고 있습니다. 기타 업그레이드 항목에는 고용량 데릭(Derrick), 필요 지역의 크라운 탑재 보상 장치(Crown-mounted compensator), 선대 대부분에 대한 대형 스러스트(Thruster) 장착 등이 포함됩니다. 경영진은 이를 글로벌 개발 프로젝트에서의 경쟁력을 향상시키기 위한 자산 수명 주기 투자로 설명했습니다.

실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 전문


전체 실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 녹취록

경영진 발표

Operator

Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Lacy, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Noble Corporation Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions]

I would now like to turn the call over to Ian MacPherson. Please go ahead.

Ian MacPherson

Thank you, operator, and welcome, everyone, to Noble Corporation's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. You can find a copy of our earnings report, along with the supporting statements and schedules on our website at noblecorp.com. We will reference an earnings presentation as well that's posted on the Investor Relations page of our website. Today's call will feature prepared remarks from our President and CEO, Robert Eifler, as well as our CFO, Richard Barker. We also have with us Blake Denton, Senior Vice President of Marketing and Contracts; and Joey Kawaja, Senior Vice President of Operations.

During this call, we may make certain forward-looking statements regarding various matters related to our business and companies that are not historical facts. Such statements are based upon current expectations and assumptions of management and are, therefore, subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Several factors could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, including those described in our earnings release and in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Noble does not assume any obligation to update these statements. Also note, we are referencing non-GAAP financial measures on the call today. You can find the required supplemental disclosure for these measures, including the most directly comparable GAAP measure and associated reconciliation in our earnings report issued yesterday, furnished to the SEC and posted to our website.

Now I'll turn the call over to Robert Eifler, President and CEO of Noble.

Robert Eifler

Thanks, Ian. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I'll open today's call with a brief summary of our third quarter highlights and recent contract awards, followed by an update on the market. Richard will then cover the financials before I wrap up with closing remarks and move to Q&A.

During the third quarter, we earned adjusted EBITDA of $201 million with free cash flow of negative $48 million. We again distributed our $0.50 quarterly dividend. And yesterday, our Board declared a $0.50 per share dividend for the fourth quarter, maintaining our consistent return of capital program. The 5% sequential decrease in adjusted EBITDA resulted from a number of rigs transitioning between contracts, including the BlackRhino Discoverer Venturer and Globetrotter I, each of which had fewer days on contract in Q3 compared to Q2. These were partially offset by the resumed operation of our 2 rigs in Brazil in July as well as the Gerry de Souza's contract startup in August.

Additionally, the Voyager commenced its 4-year contract with Shell in the U.S. Gulf in late September. Final commissioning and weather delays resulted in a few weeks later start than planned for this contract, but we are excited to now be underway with the Voyager. Next, in our major project start-up queue, we are looking forward to the Valiant and Discoverer scheduled commencements right around the end of this year on their long-term development campaign for Total and Suriname. Over the past 3 months, we have secured new contract awards totaling approximately $560 million. First, the Noble BlackRhino has been awarded a 4-well contract with TotalEnergies in Nigeria, expected to commence within the next few weeks. This program has an estimated duration of 150 days and includes options for up to 6 additional wells.

Next, I'm pleased to announce that the Noble Faye Kozack was awarded a 5-well contract with Tullow in Ghana scheduled to commence in mid-2027 with an estimated duration of approximately 250 days. Also, the sixth-generation drillship Noble Globetrotter I has been awarded a contract with TotalEnergies for light well intervention services under a 3-year capacity reservation agreement with the first scope of work scheduled to commence in Angola in Q3 or Q4 next year. However, prior to this, the rig is scheduled for a recently awarded 2-well exploration campaign with Occidental in Peru, commencing in Q2 2027, which leverages the Globetrotter's unique capability to transit through the Panama Canal in order to access this remote drilling location.

Continuing with Frontier exploration in South America, the Noble BlackHawk has been awarded a 1-well contract with Apache in Uruguay that's expected to commence in Q4 2027 with an estimated duration of 50 days and a contract value of approximately $25 million, plus additional fees for mobilization and demobilization. This contract value does not include MPD or any other additional services. As the BlackHawk is winding down its current work in the U.S. Gulf, we are continuing to pursue promising leads for additional work for the rig next year prior to the Uruguay move.

Switching over to Norway. The Noble Interceptor has been awarded a 1-well contract with DNO that's expected to commence in mid-2027 with an estimated duration of 50 to 90 days. Upon completion of this campaign, the rig is scheduled to commence its P&A program of ConocoPhillips at the Ekofisk field in the third quarter of 2027 with an estimated duration of 670 days. And finally, the Noble Intrepid was awarded a 1-well contract with ORLEN that is expected to commence in Q3 2027 with estimated duration of 40 to 60 days. With these awards, our current backlog stands at $6.7 billion.

Now zooming out for a moment to the broader market, recent trends across both the deepwater and harsh environment sectors are continuing to gain nice momentum. Deepwater contracting activity, which started out the year gangbusters, but then hit a quiet patch between May and July has recently reaccelerated over the past few months with a spate of recent pictures confirming day rate recovery for high-end drillships in the mid-400s up to $500,000 per day as current utilization, but to a greater extent, anticipated 2027 utilization continues to firm up. Today, 109 out of 110 marketed UDW rigs are contracted currently or in the future, putting contracted utilization at 99%. This eclipses the 2024 high watermark of 105 contracted rigs.

Meanwhile, current working utilization of 88 rigs is still 10 units shy of the 2024 peak. However, we've reached a point now where the number of pending contract start-ups for currently idle rigs modestly exceeds the number of contract rollovers over the next 6 months or so. This creates a fulcrum for the active rig count to potentially expand over the next few quarters as additional contracts are executed. So the deepwater market is firming up, consistent with what we've been anticipating for a while now. And this is despite the fact that we really haven't seen any real demand response so far this year resulting from higher commodity prices.

On the contrary, the U.S. Gulf, which has historically been one of the more demand elastic markets through commodity cycles, has been a noted soft spot amidst an otherwise robust global market throughout this year. Having now retreated from a low 20s rig count in recent years to a mid-teens market presently, we do expect to see some improvement in the Gulf next year based on current customer dialogue. However, the departure of a few drillships to other regions could likely create upward day rate pressure in order to drive capacity back into the Gulf, perhaps similar to recent dynamics in the harsh semi market, which in recent years have seen Norway rig count dip from the high teens down to the mid-teens and now back up to the high teens, with strengthening Norway day rates accompanying the migration of capacity back into that region.

And speaking of Norway, I would further add that the Norwegian jack-up market is also developing into a bright spot for Noble. With our recent contract awards, we now have 4 of our 5 CJ-70 jack-ups contracted in Norway for the first time, which is very promising improvement with leading-edge day rates ranging between $230,000 to $300,000, depending on work mode and contract duration. Currently, the Noble Innovator, the older unit among our 5 CJ-70s, remains uncontracted, but we're optimistic about contracting that rig fairly soon in the Southern North Sea where day rates are structurally lower. But nonetheless, this gives us a clear shot at approaching effectively full utilization for our jack-ups in 2027.

Now I'll pass the call over to Richard for the financial review.

Richard Barker

Thank you, Robert, and good morning or good afternoon all. In my prepared remarks today, I will briefly review the highlights of our third quarter and then discuss the outlook for the fourth quarter of 2026. Starting with our quarterly results. Total revenue for the third quarter totaled $684 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $201 million and adjusted EBITDA margin was 28%. Q3 cash flow from operations was $144 million. Capital expenditures were $192 million and free cash flow was negative $48 million. On October 9, the sale of the Noble Resolve was finalized with the company receiving the remaining $45 million of proceeds. Further, the sale of the Noble Globetrotter II is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026 for a purchase price of $38 million.

As summarized on Page 5 of the earnings presentation slides, our total backlog as of October 26 stands at $6.7 billion. As a reminder, our backlog excludes reimbursable revenue as well as revenue from ancillary services. Our current backlog includes approximately $2.6 billion that is scheduled for revenue conversion in 2027. Referring to Page 9 of the earnings presentation, we have narrowed our full year 2026 guidance for total revenue to between $2.85 billion and $2.9 billion compared with $2.8 billion and $2.9 billion previously and adjusted EBITDA to between $850 million and $900 million compared with $850 million and $925 million previously, as we expect Q4 to be slightly lower compared to Q3. Revenue was narrowed around the high end of the previous range, driven by higher reimbursable revenue than previously expected, while adjusted EBITDA was narrowed around the lower end, driven primarily by slightly later starts for the Voyager and the Valiant.

Additionally, capital expenditures guidance for this year has been increased to $680 million to $705 million compared with $615 million to $665 million previously, with the increase primarily attributable to higher customer reimbursable capital expenditures, which is now expected to total roughly $65 million for this year as compared to $25 million previously. If you exclude this $14 million increase in reimbursables, our capital expenditures guidance would have otherwise remained within the prior range.

Looking ahead, while we plan to provide formal guidance for 2027 on next quarter's earnings call, I would like to share the following directional indicators. In the first quarter of 2027, adjusted EBITDA is expected to be broadly similar to Q4 2026. We then expect adjusted EBITDA to build meaningfully higher each quarter as we progress through the year, supported by the buildup in our contract coverage with already approximately 20% more capacity under contract in the second half of the year compared to the first half. This is a noteworthy contrast with recent years in terms of the general slope of our contract coverage for the following year. And as Robert referenced, there were several opportunities we are actively chasing that start around the middle of the year that would build on top of this already existing contracted step-up.

With that, I'll now pass it back to Robert for concluding remarks.

Robert Eifler

Thanks, Richard. To wrap up, we're excited about both the direction of the market as well as Noble's positioning as we ramp into some pretty meaningful contract start-ups over the coming quarters. The gathering drumbeat of exploration and reserve replacement imperatives facing resource holders, combined with a forward oil price curve that has been melting higher through the end of the decade, have the potential to drive meaningfully tighter market conditions ahead. And specifically, based on the robust portfolio of contract opportunities in front of us today, it's not hard to draw a straight line to a fully sold-out market for high-end deepwater rigs within the next year or so.

Even under a more moderate demand scenario, however, we believe Noble is exceptionally well positioned to execute our playbook, generate durable free cash flow and deliver substantial returns of capital to shareholders through cycle. The backlog that we've secured since last year provides a clear line of sight to a significant cash flow inflection as we move through 2027 with, as Richard just highlighted, approximately 20% more contracted fleet capacity already secured in the second half of 2027 versus the first half of the year. And of course, we will have some opportunity to build on this.

This dynamic, in particular, is clearly supportive of an improving outlook, especially when contrasted against comparable measurements in recent years when the deepwater outlook has been burdened by significant white space problems. For example, 12 months ago, our H2 2026 days under contract were 5% shy of H1 2026 contracted days. And 24 months ago, when we were in the relatively early days of the emerging downdraft in the market, our contract coverage in the second half of 2025 was at that time actually 33% below H1 2025. So today's situation does indeed represent a very pronounced upturn in the shape of our backlog heading into 2027. And with that as a launch point, we're increasingly excited about the opportunity set in front of us.

Operator, we're ready to go to questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Arun Jayaram from JPMorgan.

질의응답

Arun Jayaram

Hey, Robert and team, I was wondering if you could comment a little bit on kind of changes you've seen in the overall market since last quarter and you gave your semiannual review of rig demand. We have noted that the contracted rig count has moved up by about 5 rigs. I think last quarter was about 104 and now you're at 109. So maybe just comment on what you're seeing that's evolved over the last, call it, 90 days and maybe add a little bit of regional color as well. Appreciate that.

Robert Eifler

Sure, Arun. Thanks for the question. Yes, we noted in the prepared remarks that we were in a bit of a doldrum over the summer months on fixtures. And you've referenced those that are known where we're up a handful of rigs on total demand rig count. What I would say is beyond that, we see now, I think, 2 to 3 opportunities in the U.S. Gulf that are somewhat closer to firm than we saw 90 days ago, which is obviously extremely helpful. And we see everything moving forward as planned through Kercom in West Africa. And then I would also note probably the other most notable change is we're feeling very good about demand emerging in India. So if you recall, there was some excitement there and then some tenders were postponed. And since that time, it appears obvious to us that, that I don't know, anywhere from 2, but probably something closer to 4 good drillships are going to be needed in India starting in late '27 and '28. I think those are probably the most bullish changes that we've seen in the last 90 days are U.S. and India.

Arun Jayaram

Great. And my follow-up, Robert, we're still in the early innings of kind of the OFS earnings season. But one of the themes that SLB highlighted on their call is just this renewed interest in exploration. And we did note in your updated fleet status report some opportunities in Peru and Uruguay. So I was wondering if you could just comment on general trends you're seeing in exploration over the next, call it, 12 to 18 months? And maybe part and parcel with that, are you seeing opportunities for chunkier development opportunities, which could have a little bit of a longer-term duration to those versus some of the exploration opportunities that tend to be a couple of wells here or there?

Robert Eifler

Yes. So I think if you just walk back through just a tiny history of exploration, I think it was around 3 years ago where we started seeing our customers start to talk a little bit more about reserve replacement. And then in the last 18 months or so, we started to see some real movement among our customers and increased narrative, specifically in exploration. There have been some, I guess, public commitments by our customers and statements around a return to exploration in various different regions. 2027 has been cited as a year where we would perhaps see an uptick in some of the, call it, wildcat exploration, which I think is where you really want to be looking right now. And so I would agree completely with what SLB said. What -- the only thing I would say is in terms of what has hit our business, you've seen the couple you referenced on our fleet status. It's not a needle mover, I don't think, for our business from where we sit today. We're very hopeful that as our customers exit budget season with really good cash flow during 2026 that we might actually see some more evidence of wildcat exploration in 2027.

And then you asked about development. This cycle has been -- I don't know if it's been reversed, but most of what's driven the demand heretofore has been development projects. So it's like a lot of things that have been delayed in years past are now starting up. That's what's driving, I think, the global uptick that we see in late and have referenced in late '27. And so -- and included in a lot of that, I think the exploration we've seen over the last couple of years has all been infield exploration. And so we watch that closely. That -- the percentage of our wells that's infield exploration has stayed relatively flat over the last few years. And so we're like you, really watching some more wildcat type exploration closely, and we're hopeful that, that starts to define the next phase in this uptick that we've been calling for here. But I think '27 is when we might get a little bit more clarity there.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Fredrik Stene with Clarkson Securities.

Fredrik Stene

I would argue that you provided a relatively strong contracting update today with rates being supportive on most of these contracts, particularly happy to read and hear your commentary about the jack-ups, which have been lagging a bit with the leading-edge rates now being stronger. But I wanted to -- with rates being in a good place, I wanted to touch a bit on utilizations maybe in the near to medium term for certain specific rigs. You have some open capacity next year on the Stanley Lafosse, you have the Viking that has availability and obviously, the BlackHawk, which you've now in for a short-term contract towards the latter part of 2027. If we -- feel free to give specifics, but if you were to take like a portfolio view of maybe the drillships in particular that have open capacity, what kind of utilization should we expect on those in those areas which are now at least for now uncovered?

Robert Eifler

Yes, Fredrik, thanks. So all 3 of the -- well, all of the rigs are competing -- well, they're competing in slightly different markets. The Viking, I think it's very likely to stay in Southeast Asia. We have a number of opportunities for that rig that would close some of the gap before its long-term contract. So I think it could perhaps get up to in the 50% type range on utilization next year. But as the fleet status shows, we need to win some work there. And then I would lump the other rigs probably into more of a similar group. So we mentioned on the prepared remarks that we do have some work for the BlackHawk that we're hopeful comes through prior to its transfer transit down to Uruguay. And then there's a fair amount of work following that. And so we think between the Hawk and the BlackRhino that there are a lot of opportunities towards the end of '27 and '28, most of which are for long term -- for the long term. So we're pretty comfortable that we're going to fill in some white space on those rigs.

The Stanley Lafosse has work potential both in the U.S. and then outside the U.S. And I guess what I would say there is if it were to go outside the U.S., that's more likely to go back to work in late '27, early '28, that kind of time frame.

Fredrik Stene

All right. That's very helpful. And then as a follow-up, 3 or 2 questions, if I were to sound completely honest. The first one is with the rates being higher for ultra-deepwater market at the moment, what kind of delta should we expect for the Guyana rigs in terms of repricing and the mechanism that's at play there? I think it's being discussed it every September and March or something? And how will that play into your financials next year and '28 for that matter? And second, are you able to provide some guidance on how the agreement on the Globetrotter I work since it's more of a call-out arrangement with minimum utilization rather than a regular day-to-day contract?

Robert Eifler

Yes. So on the CEA, I guess I'd kind of say what we always say, which is it tracks market extremely well. We set the latest rate about a month ago that will start next year. And because we had one rate through all of '26 and then we have a rate that will start in late '27. We never disclosed the rates. What I would say is that it was set right around a month ago, maybe just a bit more and tracks the market very closely. And that will be a 6-month rate starting in January 1. And we've just adjusted the timing on that this year. So we had one rate for all of this year and then the next 6-month rate starts January 1. It's just easier for everybody. Over to the Globetrotter I, putting aside its exploration drilling well. The intervention project is 3 years long. It has a minimum of 150 days per year included in that. And then as most people listening probably know the intervention market is just a little bit different than the drilling market. It's planned on a much, much shorter cycle and it's more -- I'd call -- we call it call-out work, which compared to our drilling work, it is effectively call-out work.

And so the way I would think about that program is that it's roughly kind of breakeven at the minimum number of days per year. And then as call-out work fills in extra days, then we can earn some margin on top of that. We really like it. We think that rig is very well set up to kind of be that hybrid where it does intervention work, but can also head to run to some drilling wells where needed as we've seen and with a potential uptick in exploration and our belief for a long time that intervention is going to grow through time. We think this is a good contract for the rig, even if it's not going to be a real needle mover for us from a free cash flow generation perspective.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Scott Gruber with Citigroup.

Scott Gruber

I just wanted to follow up on the last line of question. So on the Globetrotter, as you kind of cycle between kind of working and not working, can you help us on the cost side of things? How should we think about cost well working and not working? And how you think about kind of managing those costs through the kind of on-off schedule?

Robert Eifler

Yes. So not working, we can get the costs well down, call it, to about 50% of what a Tier 1 drillship might cost. And while it's working, it's only slightly higher than that, call it, 60% of a working drillship in that range. That's an intervention mode. So when I mentioned the -- that sort of cash flow breakeven to moderately better than that, that's assuming that full intervention cost load all the way through. So that's, call it, 60% of the cost of a working Tier 1 rig.

Scott Gruber

Got you. And do you have much insight today in terms of the uptime extending beyond the 150 kind of days annual commitment?

Robert Eifler

We don't right now. I mean we're hopeful that we can -- I think I'm just going to throw out there. A great year, we think, would be to be able to double that number and keep it working kind of around 300 days. And then an average would probably be halfway between 150 and 300. So just over 200 -- low 200s per day -- I mean, per year, excuse me.

Scott Gruber

Yes. If I could just squeeze in one more, too. On the Guyanese rates, those are measured against market rates, not spot, correct? And is the measuring stick a global market rate or more region-wise to Latin America or the Americas in total?

Robert Eifler

It's a global market rate for a Tier 1 drillship.

Scott Gruber

Got you. For realized rate, not spot.

Robert Eifler

Yes. So what -- yes, it is. It's -- the way I would say it works in practice, which I love the way this is set up is because it's negotiated each round. And so because fixtures are all so bespoke and almost every fixture has some sort of special story to it, all of that does go into consideration. So that kind of all gets thrown out on the table and negotiated. It's not just a formulaic average of an Excel sheets print out. And frankly, that's why I think it tracks the market so well.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Keith Beckmann with Pickering Energy Partners.

Keith Beckmann

I just wanted to ask around -- I want to dig into the Gulf a little bit more around some of the comments you had earlier. I mean, are you seeing some of the smaller independent drillers in the Gulf worry about a lack of rig supply into next year as we see potentially several longer-term programs in West Africa and Southeast Asia. And in that case, I mean, is that what potentially caused them to move some of these programs up from maybe what their expectations were before? Just any commentary around that.

Robert Eifler

What I would say is it is becoming increasingly obvious that supply could be an issue. I think, to our customers broadly, whether they're small or large. Whether someone has brought a program forward out of that, I wish I could say yes, but I'm not sure that we've actually seen that.

Keith Beckmann

Okay. And then my second question is just around, I mean, how are customers thinking about contract duration today? We've seen day rates continue to tick up here a little bit here over the last couple of months. Are they looking to lock stuff up for potentially prices rise further? Or are they potentially pushing stuff off right now, thinking hopefully, day rates come back down? Just maybe recent customer conversations around that.

Robert Eifler

Yes. I would say just tracking over the last 90 days that urgency has gone up, not down. But I would also say that we're far from a market where there's legitimate concern about not being able to drill a program because of supply. So whatever kind of middle ground that is, I think we're starting to hear more comments about how it's looking pretty tight going into 2028. The deepwater market is looking pretty tight. But we're still a ways away from the urgency we've seen in certain past cycles where you really -- where it's really driving duration decisions. I think duration decisions are still largely driven by need.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Eddie Kim with Barclays.

Edward Kim

So you mentioned that the deepwater market is firming up despite no demand uplift so far this year from higher commodity prices. Could you elaborate on that for us? Is it your view that the recent contracting increase we've seen would have happened even without the increase in oil prices and that we should have seen more multiyear contracts announced by now given the elevated level of oil prices? And if that's the case, what do you think is the main reason that the customers are sort of holding back at this point?

Robert Eifler

Yes. It's -- Ed, you're breaking up a little bit, but -- so why are the higher commodity prices from this year not driving activity? We cast it as a positive because just because obviously, more cash flow for our customers is good for us. We really haven't seen very much increasing. We haven't seen -- I don't think we've seen any demand that's arisen from this. And I think it's because, a) discipline has ruled our customers for this entire cycle, up cycle, mid-cycle, wherever we are right now. And that's not going to change. And so there's additional cash flow right now, which is good. It's not translating into drilling just yet, which obviously we wish it had. I think we remain hopeful that in '27, we'll see some additional exploration work. We mentioned that earlier. And then I would say just the nature of all of the markets this year have been, I think, a little bit baffling for a lot of people. So I think there's an understanding that the oil -- current oil price could go right back down almost overnight given the geopolitical drivers and everything that's out there. And so people aren't really willing to make long-term decisions off of it right now.

We've pointed to the middle part of the Brent curve is probably the best indicator of our business for quite some time. And as we mentioned, it's bumped up a little bit, but it has been a lot less volatile than near-term pricing all the way through all of this. And so I think we've just seen our customers maintain a disciplined and steady posture towards deepwater drilling. It's positive. I think any of our customers would say that they have a belief that deepwater is going to gain market share here through time, but it's not being strongly affected by the events of this year.

Edward Kim

Got it. Understood. My follow-up is just on your commentary on leading edge day rates on recent contracts for Tier 1 drillships now in the mid-400s and close to $500,000 a day, which is evident from kind of the recent contracting we've seen. I mean it wasn't too long ago when we were in the low 400. So just curious if sort of the progression of day rates has increased faster than you would have expected at the beginning of the year or if the pace has been sort of in line with your expectations based on the demand outlook that you have seen.

Robert Eifler

Yes. So I think there's 2 things going on. The answer is no, it's not surprising. Back in '21 and '22, that kind of time frame, we saw rates move at least as fast, I would argue actually on a percentage basis, much faster. So it happened. So I think there's a couple of things going on. One, we are plus 5-ish units here recently. The marketed utilization is up to like 99%. So probably working utilization matters a little bit more for total pricing. So I think you'd see an even a much bigger move if working utilization -- if working utilization goes up to that 99% range, which, as we said in the comments, you can see a path to that for 2028 right now. But nonetheless, people can see out and see what we see, which is not only 99% market utilization, but a working rig count in late '27 that's roughly equal to where we are today, maybe slightly up from where we are today, which means every incremental contract that's signed for late '27 adds to the working rig count. And so people see what we see and the market is pricing accordingly. I think it makes sense.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff LeBlanc with TPH Research.

Jeffrey LeBlanc

I wanted to see on the jack-ups, is the expectation that the 4 jack-ups should remain in Norway moving forward? Or should we still expect some move between the 2 sides of the market?

Robert Eifler

Yes. I think we're finally, for the first time in years, hopeful that the 4 newest CJ-70s are going to stay in Norway.

Jeffrey LeBlanc

Okay. And then the secondary question is on the global -- Globetrotter, excuse me, is the expectation that, that drillship will remain in the global marketed fleet once the sale completes? Or will it be removed?

Robert Eifler

Into the GT2, no, it's coming out of the drilling fleet.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers.

Noel Parks

It's really interesting to hear what you've seen as far as continued support for exploration out there in the marketplace. And I guess that makes me think a bit more about maybe pivoting back to talking about the development side. So of course, products are generally economic at far below the current prices we're seeing. But I'm just wondering, do you -- are you detecting any greater confidence among producers may be reflected in their budgeting for 2027 into 2028, where perhaps the industry is taking the Iran war supply disruptions considerably more seriously than certainly the markets have. So I just wonder if you sense a little bit more urgency on the development side.

Robert Eifler

Yes. I got to say we have -- from what we see, which granted is never at the very cutting edge of how our customers are thinking about how it gets down to like thinking about drilling rigs. But we have seen remarkably little change in the stance of our customers. And they continue -- by our observation, they continue to use very conservative breakeven oil price assumptions, and they continue to be extremely disciplined. I think -- we're thinking about the future as if that does not change. And I'm fond of saying that we're fans of efficiency because the deepwater is drilling itself into work as it gets more efficient. But we very much see the future of deepwater working because barrels are profitable at that kind of 60s and 70s range and really below that for breakeven, but that our customers are willing to drill and develop large projects at prices that fit nicely into the middle parts of the Brent curve. We haven't changed our stance on that at all in the outlook.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Greg Lewis with BTIG.

Gregory Lewis

Robert, you provided a lot of color on the market. I was hoping to kind of get a big picture around like how we should be thinking about CapEx. I think one of the things, clearly, you guys are generating a lot of cash. I guess kind of a couple of questions around here. But like coming off of the down cycle, kind of like as you look at your fleet today, is it kind of where it needs to be for the next couple of years of the up cycle, i.e. I get we're upgrading the GreatWhite, the Claus rig and -- but like other rigs, right, as we think about where they are, could we be thinking about, hey, you know what, this rig needs this upgrade, this rig needs that upgrade? Or could we actually see kind of a move lower in CapEx as we look out over the next couple of years?

Robert Eifler

Yes. How about -- let me explain a little bit around the types of upgrades we made, and then I'll hand it to Richard and he can give you a little kind of, I guess, history of our CapEx and how it fit into the cycle. So everything we've done -- the Bachmann, we fundamentally changed the marketability of that rig by making it Norway compliant. So I think that's baked in now that rig is worth substantially more because of its increased earnings power because of the upgrades that we're performing on that rig right now. So it's been -- the rig is capable of working in Norway will go to Norway, and it's a great place for the rig. We're very, very proud to be supported by our customer in moving that rig into that region. Everything else falls into kind of a different bucket, which would be a range of, obviously, maintenance CapEx over to some more specific upgrades. But I'm extremely pleased with where we're going to sit by the end of 2027 on all of our Tier 1 drillships. Every single one of those will have MPD. We will have 2 million, 2.8 million pound Derricks that are highly competitive in the U.S. Gulf.

We've added grown non compensators where needed. And already a majority of our fleet has larger thrusters that allow them to work effectively anywhere around the globe. There's are a lot of drillships out there that actually can't work in some of the emerging markets. So -- it's obviously coming at a cost right now in '26 and in early '27. But we are so well set up with the quality of our fleet going into late '27 and '28. These are life of asset upgrades. And I actually think the timing is darn close to perfect for us on having made these investments.

Richard Barker

And Greg, just to add to that, obviously, we're spending a lot of capital on the fleet right now. That will continue, if you will, to kind of mid next year. But obviously, the earnings power that this kind of increases or the increase in earnings power around that fleet is significant. So once you get to kind of second half of next year, kind of the EBITDA and free cash flow run rate is pretty significant. Maybe just to put kind of normalized CapEx into focus here. What we said at the beginning of the year was that net CapEx would be in the high 300s to kind of $400 million range on a normalized basis. This would exclude the Claus Bachmann. We are seeing some inflationary pressure. So I think you should think about normalized CapEx for us in the high end of that range, so within that kind of $400 million kind of area type context. Obviously, that excludes the Claus Bachmann. And as you think about 2027, we probably have just over half of the Claus Bachmann CapEx to spend in 2027. So from a kind of a net CapEx perspective, I think hopefully that gives you some guidance here for kind of '27 and beyond.

Gregory Lewis

Yes. And just so as we think about that rig, that rig is starting up in March. So when it leaves for that maiden voyage, that it's good to go. It's not going to go back in, right?

Richard Barker

Correct. That is right. Yes.

Gregory Lewis

Okay. And then I did have one other question. Just -- Robert, this is for you. Just it's been interesting I mean, clearly, we've always seen rig pocket contract, right? Obviously, you guys have the 4 rigs with Exxon and Guyana. You were able to get those 2 Shell rigs. This development work, we've been talking a lot about development drilling. But I guess my question is, at this point, as we look out over the next couple of years and our understanding is there is still a couple of opportunities for multi-rigs going with one customer in one region for development drilling. Are we at a point now with the fleet where we need to start maybe being a little more selective in some of the work we're doing simply because we want to be in the right place at the right time to potentially win some of these multi-rig tenders?

Robert Eifler

Yes. So there are multiple multi rig development programs out there. And I think that's one of the things that makes us so excited going into exiting '27 because those we think now we have some clearer sight that those are going to come through. I think we've always been selective. We have really embraced efficiency and technology, as I mentioned, around the CapEx upgrades. And those really pay for themselves in development projects way more than anywhere else. And so we've targeted and really wanted to be in some of these bigger development projects. I think we've done a good job with had a fair amount of success there. That won't necessarily change for us, and there are some additional projects out there that are on the table for us and nothing is done yet. But obviously, pricing has moved and we'll continue to move with whatever the market dictates. But nothing's really changed about where we see our strengths as a company.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn it back to Ian MacPherson for closing remarks.

Ian MacPherson

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We appreciate your interest in Noble, and we will look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Have a great day.

Operator

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

이 문서에는 사람이 검토한 AI 생성 콘텐츠 또는 AI 번역 콘텐츠가 포함될 수 있습니다. 이는 참고용 및 전반적인 정보를 제공용으로만 제공되며 투자 조언에 해당하지 않습니다.

면책 조항: 이 웹사이트에서 제공되는 정보는 교육적이고 정보 제공을 위한 목적으로만 사용되며, 금융 또는 투자 조언으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

코멘트 (0)

$ 버튼을 클릭하고, 종목 코드를 입력한 후 주식, ETF 또는 기타 티커를 연결합니다.

0/500
코멘트 가이드라인
로딩 중...

추천 기사

tradingkey.logo
위험 경고: 저희 웹사이트와 모바일 앱은 특정 투자 상품에 대한 일반적인 정보만을 제공합니다. Finsights는 재정적 조언이나 투자 상품에 대한 추천을 제공하지 않으며, 이러한 정보 제공이 Finsights가 금융 조언이나 추천을 제공하는 것으로 해석되어서는 안 됩니다.
투자 상품은 투자 원금 손실을 포함한 상당한 투자 위험에 노출되어 있으며, 모든 사람에게 적합하지 않을 수 있습니다. 투자 상품의 과거 성과는 미래 성과를 보장하지 않습니다.
Finsights는 제3자 광고주나 제휴사가 저희 웹사이트나 모바일 앱 또는 그 일부에 광고를 게재하거나 전달할 수 있도록 허용할 수 있으며, 사용자가 광고와 상호작용하는 방식에 따라 이들로부터 보상을 받을 수 있습니다.
© 저작권: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 모든 권리 보유