Upexi（UPXI）2026年度第4四半期・通期決算説明会：2億4,610万ドルの赤字、234万SOLを保有

要点

• Upexiは2026通期会計年度の純損失が2億4,610万ドル（1株当たり3.87ドル）になったと発表しました。これは主に1億9,510万ドルの暗号資産（デジタル資産）未実現損失、1,170万ドルの実現損失、および2,190万ドルの株式報酬費用によるものです。
• 2026年6月30日時点において、同社は約234万ソラナ（Solana）トークンを保有しており、取得原価ベースで3億6,030万ドル（1トークン当たり平均取得単価154ドル）でした。保有資産の約95%がステーキングされていました。
• 通期の暗号資産による売上高は合計約1,740万ドルで、獲得したSOLは約13万5,000SOLに相当します。
• Upexiは当四半期末時点で前四半期比65%増となる580万ドルの現金で締めくくり、6月に約2,000万ドルの負債を消滅させました。年度末以降、同社は信用枠のリファイナンスを行い、金利を11.5%から7.5%に引き下げました。
• 製造、倉庫保管、物流業務のアウトソーシングに伴い、同社はフルタイム従業員数を前年の59人から10人に削減しました。
• 経営陣は今後、ステーキング収入が継続的なキャッシュ支出を十分に上回ると見込んでおり、効率化プログラムの成果は2026年9月30日終了四半期に表れると予想しています。

主要財務データ

事業および業績の概要

第4四半期は、Upexiのソラナ（Solana）財務戦略導入から1周年となりました。経営陣によると、2026年6月30日終了四半期中にソラナは全体として下落傾向にあり、同社は流動性の確保、負債の削減、および運営効率の向上を優先課題としました。

Upexiが保有する234万SOLトークンの約95%がステーキングされています。同社は、慎重なレバレッジ管理およびリスク管理を維持しながら、ステーキング報酬、規律ある資本活動、および割安なロックドトークンの好機をとらえた購入を通じて、1株当たりのソラナ保有量を増やすことに引き続き注力しています。

Upexiは、製造、倉庫保管、および物流のアウトソーシングを含む効率化施策を完了しました。フルタイムの従業員数は前年の59人から10人に減少し、経営陣の言葉を借りれば、より予測可能性の高い費用構造が構築されました。

同社は2026通期会計年度中に、1株当たり加重平均価格0.96ドルで約290万株の自社株買いを実施し、取得総額は約280万ドルとなりました。年度末以降には、ATM（At-The-Market）発行プログラムを通じて約250万株を発行し、約250万ドルの手取額（総額）を得ました。

経営陣の見通し

経営陣は、コスト削減の成果が2026年9月30日終了四半期に表れると見込んでいます。また、今後ステーキング収入が継続的なキャッシュ支出を十分に上回ると予想しています。

役員陣は、暗号資産市場の回復により価値創出の機会が拡大すると考えているものの、この見通しはソラナの価格や暗号資産市場全体の状況に依存していると述べました。

リスクと注目点

• ソラナ価格の変動性は2026通期会計年度の業績に重大な影響を与え、1億9,510万ドルの未実現損失および1,170万ドルの実現損失をもたらしました。
• 株主資本はマイナス5,380万ドルに減少しました。これは主に、暗号資産トレジャリーにおける損失や同戦略の実施によるその他の影響を反映しています。
• Upexiがトレジャリー拡大のために短期債務や可換社債を利用したことで、支払利息は1,360万ドルに増加しました。ただし、その後信用枠の金利引き下げを行いました。
• 経営陣は、当四半期中に一部の追加的な利回り機会の魅力が低下したと述べました。同社は、投資家が容易に理解できる低リスクかつ継続的な戦略に対して高い基準を維持しています。
• 未償還の可換社債の最終的な取り扱いは不透明であり、Upexiの株価変動性、ソラナの価格、および協議による代替案の可能性に一部依存します。

アナリスト質疑応答のハイライト

アナリストからは、通常のステーキングを超えてUpexiがどのように利回りを増加させることができるかについての質問がありました。経営陣は機会の評価を継続しているものの、当四半期中に一部のリスク・リターン構造の魅力が薄れたため慎重に行動してきたと答えました。役員陣は、暗号資産市場の状況が回復すれば、こうした機会も改善する可能性があると示しました。

可換社債について、経営陣はソラナおよびUpexi株の双方の変動性を挙げ、転換されないままにとどまると決め付けることを避けました。同社は協議による転換、満期延長、または行使価格の変更（リプライシング）を検討する可能性はありますが、対応が早すぎると過剰な価値を損なうことになりかねないと述べました。

資本配分に関して、経営陣は1株当たりのSOL保有量を増やす可能性に基づいて、割引された負債の消滅、自社株買い、およびATM発行を検討すると述べました。またUpexiは、自社、投資家、株主に恩恵をもたらし得るクリエイティブな取引の追求も計画しています。

経営陣は、Blueprintバリデータとの関係はHivemindとの取引の条件ではなかったと述べました。Upexiは複数のバリデータを利用しており、ステーキングの経済性と報酬に基づいてそれらを評価しています。また経営陣によると、Hivemindとの広範なパートナーシップは、Upexiがアジア市場への展開を拡大するのにも役立つ可能性があるとのことです。

決算説明会トランスクリプト全文

決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト

経営陣による説明

Operator

Good day, and welcome to the Upexi Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Valter Pinto, Managing Director of KCSA Strategic Communications. Please go ahead.

Valter Pinto

Thank you, operator. Good evening, and welcome, everyone, to the Upexi Fiscal Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. I'm joined today by Allan Marshall, Chief Executive Officer; Andrew Norstrud, Chief Financial Officer; and Brian Rudick, Chief Strategy Officer.

Before we begin, I'm going to remind everyone that statements made during today's conference call may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors.

For a detailed discussion of some of the ongoing risks and uncertainties in the company's business, I'll refer you to the press release issued this evening and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K as well as the company's reports filed periodically with the SEC. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law.

In addition, during the course of the call, we may refer to non-GAAP financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and they may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

The reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are contained in our earnings release issued this evening, unless otherwise noted. I'd now like to turn the call over to Upexi's CEO, Allan Marshall.

Allan Marshall

Thank you, Valter, and welcome, everyone, to our fiscal fourth quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Our fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2026, marks not only the end of our fiscal year, but also the 1-year anniversary of our Solana treasury strategy. As such, I wanted to start with a brief review. We first embarked on our Solana treasury strategy in April 2025 as it became apparent that the U.S. administration and its agencies were turning from a headwind to a tailwind for digital assets.

To bootstrap the strategy, we completed what we believe to be the first large-scale equity raise for an altcoin treasury, raising $100 million and kickstarting the digital asset treasury company trend in the U.S. We followed with a second highly accretive raise in July 2025, taking in an additional $200 million and including, we believe, the first in-kind convertible note, again, demonstrating our innovation within the capital markets.

Turning to the quarter, April, May and June were characterized by a subdued market environment for digital assets and though volatile, Solana generally trended lower throughout the quarter. During this bear market, we focused on what we could control. Management worked to fortify the balance sheet with debt reductions and increasing capital on hand using our ATM. Secondly, we dramatically reduced expenses and streamlined our business to create a very predictable expense profile.

On the balance sheet front, we spent the quarter focused on a number of initiatives to strengthen our financial position. We used some of the ATM proceeds to increase our cash position, which totaled $5.8 million as of June 30, up 65% from the prior quarter end. Separately, in June, we extinguished roughly $20 million in debt. And subsequent to quarter end, we refinanced our existing credit facility, moving the interest rate from 11.5% to 7.5% and reducing the amount of collateral required for the line.

All in, we are in a much stronger position and ready for any market environment that may come. On expense management, we successfully completed our efficiency initiative, which included outsourcing our manufacturing, warehousing and logistics operations and reducing full-time employees from 59 a year ago to just 10 today.

As previously guided, we expect these efforts to show up in the current quarter ending September 30 and specifically for our staking revenue to more than cover our ongoing cash expenses on a go-forward basis. Before concluding, I want to express the fact that this is just our first year. And while the crypto market has not been what we hoped for, we believe it's still in the early innings.

The market will turn up again. And when the bull market returns, which it will, the opportunities to create value will be abundant and the premiums will return. The work we have done this year will amplify the capitalization of those as we execute upon them. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to our Chief Strategy Officer, Brian Rudick.

Brian Rudick

Thanks, Allan, and hello, everyone. Allan covered our strategic priorities and progress at the company, and I will provide an update on Solana. After all, the main determinant of the success of any treasury company will be the performance of its underlying token. Put simply, Solana remains incredibly well positioned. As a brief review, Solana is a high-performance blockchain and is uniquely positioned as the first second-generation smart contract blockchain.

This gives Solana both best-in-class technology from having come later than early generation blockchains and deep network effects with a plethora of users, developers and applications. While one may think of Solana and smart contract blockchains as a new computing paradigm, Solana is hyper-focused on internet capital markets, where it aims to provide a single liquidity venue for all the world's assets accessible to anyone, anywhere, anytime with just a simple internet connection.

Personally, I like to think of this as reimagining our antiquated global financial infrastructure, which were quite literally built 50-plus years ago, with internet and blockchain-based rails for massive speed and cost advantages and through items like stablecoins, tokenization and AI agents. And with top performance and distribution, Solana is in the catbird seat to lead this revolution.

Metrics agree and show that Solana is winning. Key statistics from last quarter include a 48% increase in stablecoin supply over the prior year, tokenized equities growing to over $420 million from virtually 0 a year ago and with trading volume of over $5 billion, amounting to a 97% market share, the cheapest median transaction fee of any chain at just $0.04, a 53% market share of all blockchain transactions and strong spot ETF inflows compared to large outflows for others.

A big reason for Solana's success and a pivotal factor for the future is Solana's growth with institutions. After all, institutions are likely the fastest way to onboard the masses given their billions of customers, built-in trust, billions of dollars of capital and leading developers.

Notable corporate announcements during the quarter were numerous and occurred in various areas from key players like in payments and stablecoins from SoFi, Western Union, MoneyGram and Mastercard, in tokenization and capital markets from State Street, Amundi, Securitize and Ondo and in infrastructure from Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Moody's and Allfunds.

It's early innings, but institutions are reimagining our antiquated financial infrastructure with Solana as the rails, and we are on our way towards internet capital markets. As that continues, Solana and Upexi are well positioned to benefit. And with that, I'll turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Norstrud, for a review of our financial performance.

Andrew Norstrud

Thank you, Brian. As of June 30, 2026, the company had approximately $5.8 million in cash, $165.3 million in Solana and $180.1 million in total assets and $45.6 million in working capital. Turning to the treasury. As of June 30, 2026, the company had approximately 2.34 million Solana tokens, having a cost basis of approximately $360.3 million, equating to an average cost per token of $154 and approximately 95% of these tokens were staked.

For the year ended June 30, 2026, the treasury had approximately $17.4 million in digital asset revenues or approximately earned 135,000 Solana tokens. There was $195.1 million in unrealized losses and $11.7 million in realized losses. For the year ended June 30, 2026, general and administrative expenses were $26.4 million compared to $11.9 million in the prior year.

The increase reflects the build-out of the treasury strategy includes $7 million increase in employee compensation, a $4 million increase in public company expenses, a $1.5 million increase in digital asset treasury fees, a $1.2 million increase in legal fees and a $1.1 million increase in travel. Stock-based compensation was approximately $21.9 million compared to $2.4 million in the prior year. Interest expense was $13.6 million compared to $1.2 million in the prior year.

The increase reflects the increase in short-term and convertible debt obtained to increase the company's treasury. The company has recently negotiated a lower interest rate on the short-term debt to reduce the interest expense. There is a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $10.3 million. This reflects the debt reduction on the -- on an acquisition loan and the partial repayment of a convertible debt in the company stock.

Net loss for the fiscal year was $246.1 million or $3.87 per share compared to a net loss of $13.7 million or $1.73 per share in fiscal year 2025. The loss was driven primarily by $195.1 million of unrealized losses on digital assets, $11.7 million of realized losses on digital assets and $21.9 million of stock compensation.

During the year, we repurchased approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock at an average weighted price of $0.96 per share for total consideration of approximately $2.8 million under the $50 million repurchase program of our Board authorized in November of 2025. Subsequent to year-end, we issued approximately 2.5 million shares under the at-the-market program for gross proceeds of approximately $2.5 million.

Total stockholders' equity was negative $53.8 million at June 30, 2026, against positive equity of $90.1 million a year ago. The year-over-year change in stockholders' equity primarily reflects the impact of the unrealized losses on our digital asset treasury and other changes associated with the execution of our treasury strategy.

Management continues to focus on growing Solana Holdings on a per share basis through disciplined capital activities, staking yield and opportunistic purchase of discounted locked tokens while maintaining prudent leverage and risk management. And now I'll turn it back over to Allan for concluding remarks.

Allan Marshall

Thanks, Andrew. I wanted to close the call by reiterating the progress we have made despite the difficult market environment for crypto. The improvements to our balance sheet and the material reduction to our expenses leave us in a position to capitalize on the inevitable upturn. The company results will improve materially when this happens and all the groundwork we did will be amplified with material improvement in the Solana price. With that, I'll turn it over to the operator for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Brian Kinstlinger with Alliance Global Partners.

質疑応答

Brian Kinstlinger

Two questions. My first one is, I'm curious if you can discuss the progress and/or ways you can maximize yield and some of the avenues you're exploring to achieve your goals? And then what are your top priorities for Upexi in the current fiscal year? And then I'll ask my second question.

Allan Marshall

Brian, do you want to take that one? Do you want me to take it? This is Allan Marshall.

Brian Rudick

Sure. Happy to. Yes, Brian, thanks for the call. I'd say that we slow-played this a bit. We looked at several different opportunities. First, one was quite attractive from both a risk and return perspective. Recall, we have a quite high bar. We want to make sure it's very low risk, and we want to make sure that it can be recurring and also something that investors understand.

What I'd say is some of the opportunities that we were looking at got less attractive during the quarter. And we think that as the crypto market comes back, a lot of those opportunities will improve as well, and we could become much more active there. So not a ton to report there, but we're still actively looking, and that is something that we do want to do.

Brian Kinstlinger

Great. My second question is, could you explain with the stock price well below the strike price for the converts, why is management choosing to calculate NAV as though these will convert as it seems like they won't, you're trading at 1.4x. And so capital raising would be accretive to SOL per share. I'd love to hear your thought process on those converts.

Allan Marshall

Sure. Brian, it's Allan Marshall. I mean, I think we spoke about this in the past. I mean, you're speculating on SOL price and asking us to do that. And we just -- I just don't think we're in a position to do that. I mean, in July of 2025 within 150 days, SOL went from $234 to $82. So I mean, we have 281 days assuming we don't either extend them or find a way to convert them like we did with the Hivemind deal.

So anything we do would have a speculation in it. So we reported this. We know what the dates are and to assume that they're not going to convert in 281 days when SOL, like I said, went from $234 to $82 in 150 days, it is an assumption I'm not willing to make. I mean, we did this transaction, assuming they would convert. And if SOL were back at $200, they would convert.

So I guess we could do percentagewise on what we think it is, but it will be speculation. So this is -- we're just being consistent with how we reported it. Like Danny said, we have -- we report on our website. We think we'll be able to either create value with these converts, find a way to convert them, Solana could go above a level that would make them convert.

So you're making one assumption that it's not going to convert, and I just don't know how we could make that -- responsibly make that same, I guess, speculation. If I was good at speculating, I would have sold on my Solana at $234 and bought it back at $82.

Brian Rudick

Yes. Brian, one thing I would add is if you take the embedded option in our in-kind notes and you run it through any sort of options pricing model like Black-Scholes, that delta is actually still quite high. It's because like the vol on our stock is extremely high, like we would trade with the beta to SOL and SOL is quite volatile, as you know.

So that suggests that there's actually still a really, really darn high chance that they do end up converting. And I think like that volatility is often overlooked. So I wanted to mention that as well.

Allan Marshall

And just not to go further, but you saw we did the Hivemind deal, we converted early. So even if somehow, we had to possibly reprice them if it was close or something, so maybe there would be some additional dilution. We just can't do -- you can't do a 0. We can't do any all-or-nothing kind of transaction. So like speculating just -- it's just hard for us right now.

Operator

Our next question is from Gareth Gacetta with Cantor Fitzgerald.

Gareth Gacetta

I wanted to touch on the June private placement. It looks like you were able to retire just under $20 million of principal for around $10 million at the time. So a pretty meaningful discount to face value. I'm wondering how we should think about the capital allocation framework going forward. And maybe if you think that something like you just did would be repeatable or then how you would weigh that versus the buyback program?

Allan Marshall

On a more general -- it's Allan Marshall. Thanks for the question. On a more general level, I think what we've been able to do over the process of building this treasury or starting the treasury and then being the first to create these in-kind notes, then finding a way to get a deal done with Hivemind to make it beneficial for both sides. I think what I would take from that is just our creativity and our awareness that these are things we have to accomplish this year.

So our process there is like how do we find creative ways to create value, whether it's another deal like Hivemind, whether it's we go back to the investors and sweeten the deal to extend the duration, whether we -- there are plenty of negotiating points, which could benefit both the investor, ourselves and the shareholder. And we're very aware that we need to at least start considering those and possibly execute on them.

We'll go back to like the volatility. It's not unreasonable that we could wake up in June of next year and SOL will be $250. So we just -- we don't want to do something too early to create a situation where we give too much back or I don't think that's the way to really look at it, but that's our thought on that. And so we continue to -- when we decide to raise money on the ATM, the closer it is to NAV, above NAV, we still think -- actually, so we look at it a little differently this year than we did last year.

Like everybody was raising as much money at NAV, put it to work. And it turns out that all of that is kind of incorrect in a certain way. I mean, correct at the moment in time, but when SOL goes from $234 to $65, everything you bought is upside down where you think you'd want to raise as much money as you can if you still believe in the story at $65.

Unfortunately, that's -- we all know that's not how the markets work. So we're trying to blend that. The ATM, we're trying to be creative. We are going to look to continue to raise capital in a way that we think is accretive in the scenario where SOL goes back to both where it's been and maybe to a new high.

Gareth Gacetta

Great. That's super helpful. And then maybe just touching on the Blueprint delegation. So it appears that Blueprint is under the umbrella of Hivemind. So I'm just wondering, was that maybe a portion of the deal or what it took to get the deal through? And could you maybe clarify how much of the treasury you're going to shift over to Blueprint?

Allan Marshall

Not sure I understand the question...

Andrew Norstrud

You're talking about the validator with Blueprint. And we're not shifting any more or less. We are partnering with them. They partnered with us in the past. We also have a few other validators that are primary ones that give us very good rates. We get back most of the staking and block rewards, everything else. So that's kind of how we look at it. We don't just favor one, but without looking at the economics of all of them.

Allan Marshall

Yes, and let me just put, yes, so the Blueprint deal was a deal that Hivemind, Matt and their team and I have been working on for a year. So it wasn't really connected. It was just like if we're going to deepen our partnership, we wanted to -- after that, you're like, hey, we can maybe increase the rewards side. So that's the way we look at that as well.

Gareth Gacetta

That makes sense. And I was actually looking into it. It looks like they have a pretty unique platform in general, just from like an asset management perspective. So maybe could you just touch on like how you see that platform and the uniqueness of it?

Allan Marshall

Yes. Some of the things that we -- are you talking about -- so the relationship with Hivemind we're looking to expand into other -- we think the U.S. market is a great market, but they have more access on their platform to enter the Asian market.

So for us, for Upexi, that partnership was how do we expand our footprint outside of that, and they're great, making a deal with them hopefully would lead to making a deal with other investors in that area of the world. And I'm not -- I'll let Andy jump in, in case the question was more about the validator.

Andrew Norstrud

Yes, just with the dashboard and everything else. One of the things that we did with this partnership before they even had a Solana validator. That's kind of why we're putting this partnership together prior to the conversion, prior to even actually the deal being done on the convertible. So it's been a process. We work together very well, and we'll continue to try to expand that as we go forward in many different ways.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Allan for closing remarks.

Allan Marshall

Thank you, everybody, for joining the call today. Thanks for the questions. Like I said, I'll just reiterate again, we're looking forward into 2027. We think there's a significant bull market coming. We think we'll be able to execute on those strategies. And I'll close that with thank you again for everyone and look forward to talking to you and listening to you on the next call.

Operator

Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect at this time and thank you for your participation.