TradingKey - As the Bank of Japan (BoJ) enters a tightening cycle, Japanese government bond (JGB) yields have been rising steadily. However, the recent sharp selloff in Japan bonds appears unusually severe.
Despite worsening fiscal conditions, rising inflationary pressure, and the BoJ scaling back its bond purchases, demand for Japanese bonds remains weak, with even traditional buyers like life insurance companies failing to step in.
Last Tuesday (May 20), an auction of 20-year JGBs served as the trigger for the latest bond rout. The bid-to-cover ratio fell to the lowest level since 2012, signaling weak investor appetite. Over the following days, 30-year and 40-year JGB yields hit record highs, while 20-year yields reached their highest level this century.
Analysts attribute the broad-based JGB selloff to multiple factors:
Goldman Sachs pointed out that the key reason behind the sharp rise in long-term JGB yields is a severe imbalance between supply and demand, particularly due to life insurers reducing their appetite for long-dated bonds.
In simple terms, duration measures either the average time it takes to recover the cost of a bond investment or how sensitive a bond's price is to interest rate changes. The longer the duration, the higher the interest rate risk and price volatility.
A duration gap refers to the difference between the duration of assets and liabilities held by financial institutions such as banks or insurance companies. In Japan, life insurers have historically faced a negative duration gap, meaning the duration of their liabilities exceeds that of their assets.
This mismatch stems from several structural issues: historically limited availability of long-term domestic bonds; long-duration life insurance liabilities (e.g., annuities); investment in short-duration instruments such as equities and overseas bonds.
To manage this negative duration gap, life insurers typically buy long-term JGBs to better match the duration of their liabilities. When interest rates rise, liabilities decrease more than assets, effectively increasing net worth — a strategy that has helped life insurers hedge against BoJ rate hikes.
However, under the current environment of rising yields and persistent rate hikes, continuing to accumulate long-term bonds would increase asset depreciation risks, offsetting the gains on the liability side and eroding the hedging benefit.
As a result, many life insurers are choosing to sit out the market.
Japan’s largest life insurer recently reported that its book losses on Japanese bonds had tripled to ¥3.6 trillion as of March, highlighting the growing pain among insurers.