帕斯瓦德金融 (CASH) 2026 財年第四季財報電話會議:重申 2027 財年 EPS 財測指引
Pathward Financial 2026財年淨利1.757億美元,稀釋每股盈餘8.14美元。放款與租賃成長9%,調整後淨利息收益率提升至5.51%。不良放款比率升至5.61%,單季淨沖銷額5,200萬美元。管理層重申2027財年稀釋每股盈餘預測為9.50至10.00美元。合作夥伴基礎多元,無單一合作夥伴貢獻超過5%收入。信用品質及再生能源專案處置為近期關注焦點,預期信貸成本將趨於正常化。
Pathward Financial (NASDAQ: CASH) 在 2026 財年結束時,商業金融收入增加、卡片及存款手續費收入成長強勁,放款亦持續擴增。信用品質仍為投資人關注的焦點,同時管理層重申 2027 財年稀釋每股盈餘預測為 9.50 美元至 10.00 美元。
重點摘要
- 2026 財年淨利為 1.757 億美元,或稀釋每股盈餘 8.14 美元。平均資產報酬率為 2.30%,平均有形權益報酬率達 32.9%。
- 截至 9 月 30 日,放款與租賃成長 9%。全年在信貸贊助業務成長帶動下,新承作放款額自去年同期的 13 億美元增加至 22 億美元。
- 受惠於生息資產組合優化與放款重新定價,第四季調整後淨利息收益率提升至 5.51%。
- 不良放款與租賃比率季增至 5.61%。單季淨沖銷額為 5,200 萬美元,其中 2,030 萬美元與商業金融相關。
- 管理層重申 2027 財年稀釋每股盈餘預測為 9.50 美元至 10.00 美元,該預測假設未來無額外利率變動、有效稅率為 18% 至 22%,且每季次級市場收入為 500 萬至 700 萬美元。
- Pathward 表示,沒有單一合作夥伴貢獻超過 5% 的收入,凸顯其合作夥伴基礎的多元化。
核心財務數據
| 指標 | 結果 | 背景說明 |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 財年淨利 | 1.757 億美元 | 受惠於合作夥伴成長與嚴格的費用控制 |
| 2026 財年稀釋 EPS | 8.14 美元 | 全年結果 |
| 平均資產報酬率 | 2.30% | 全年報酬率指標 |
| 平均有形權益報酬率 | 32.9% | 全年報酬率指標 |
| 調整後淨利息收益率 | 5.51% | 受惠於資產組合優化與重新定價,在第四財季獲得改善 |
| 放款與租賃 | +9% | 截至 9 月 30 日餘額與去年同期相比 |
| 新承作放款 | 22 億美元 | 較去年同期的 13 億美元增加 |
| 不良放款與租賃比率 | 5.61% | 季增幅度溫和 |
| 第四財季淨沖銷 | 5,200 萬美元 | 包含來自商業金融的 2,030 萬美元 |
| 流動性 | 31 億美元 | 截至 9 月 30 日 |
| 第四財季庫藏股實施 | 約 28.2 萬股 | 每股均價 88.75 美元 |
業務與營運表現
商業金融帶動單季淨利息收入成長近 600 萬美元。就整個財年而言,商業金融利息收入增加近 3,000 萬美元,主因是結構化融資業務拉動。
非利息收入在第四季錄得雙位數成長。卡片及存款手續費收入增加近 800 萬美元,其中大部分增長來自核心支付業務。
儘管截至 9 月 30 日 Pathward 資產負債表上的存款略有下降,但平均託管存款仍較去年同期增加超過 4 億美元。該公司賺取的託管存款手續費收入與聯邦基金有效利率掛鉤。
Pathward 持續拓展結構化融資、定期貸款、SBA 與 USDA 貸款,以及營運資金資產基礎貸款。該公司在 SBA 7(a) 貸款計畫中亦晉升為前 20 大放款機構。
信貸贊助是新承作放款成長的主要動力。管理層表示,在近期新增與擴大的合作夥伴計畫基礎上,較高的放款承作量代表了新的常態水準。
Pathward 延長了與 H&R Block 的長期合作夥伴關係至 7 月中旬。該公司亦強調了先前宣布與 Clair 續約的消息。管理層表示,業務成長持續來自新合作夥伴的加入以及既有合作夥伴對產品的更廣泛採用。
營運費用受益於法律及顧問成本降低,但部分被房屋及軟體費用增加所抵銷。Pathward 計劃繼續在技術、風險控管、合規、人才與流程方面進行針對性投資。
管理層指引
Pathward 重申 2027 財年稀釋每股盈餘預測為 9.50 美元至 10.00 美元。該展望假設:
- 本財年內無額外利率變動。
- 有效稅率為 18% 至 22%。
- 每季次級市場收入為 500 萬至 700 萬美元。
- 預期的庫藏股回購。
管理層預計 2027 財年的投資將從 12 月季度開始。第一季的招聘預計會在本財年早期提高薪酬與福利支出水準,而顧問支出在上半財年預計將維持適度偏高。
隨著不良放款漸次處置,公司預計 2027 財年信貸成本將趨於正常化。管理層指出,商業金融的正常化歷史信用損失準備率約為 120 至 130 個基點,具體取決於新增放款組合。根據目前狀況,預計未來提存主要將由放款成長帶動,而非信用品質進一步惡化。
證券投資組合預計隨著時間將穩定在約 8 億至 10 億美元。管理層預期 2027 財年約 1.4 億至 1.5 億美元的本金到期回收款,大部分將轉向放款投資組合;不過在降息環境下,適度購買證券亦可提供收益保護。
風險與關注焦點
信用品質仍是近期主要的關注點。不良放款與租賃比率升至 5.61%,且沖銷額維持在偏高水準。管理層表示,這些問題集中於先前已討論過的授信案(包括再生能源專案),並非代表整體投資組合惡化。
部分再生能源專案在竣工與出售前仍需要資金支援。在基礎專案出售之前,這些營建墊款仍列為非應計項目,這可能在處置過程中使報導的不良資產維持在較高水準。
較高的利率可能因增加資金成本並要求補充股權,進而改變再生能源專案的經濟效益。不過管理層表示,專案的報酬率通常仍可讓具可行性的交易在調整結構後繼續推進。
公司亦指出,合約中基於交易量的獎勵支付可能在不同季度之間轉移,導致卡片與存款手續費收入出現波動,儘管全年支付金額相對穩定。
分析師問答亮點
管理層表示,Pathward 的成長管道涵蓋信貸贊助、嵌入式金融、發卡、收單及其他由合作夥伴主導的產品。由於新發卡計畫通常需要較長的導入與推廣期,預計既有合作夥伴仍將是近期收入成長的最大來源。
在競爭優勢定位方面,執行長 Brett Pharr 認為企業文化是競爭對手最難複製的能力。他指出,銀行基礎設施與計畫管理需要不同的營運文化,這使得完全垂直整合相當困難。
隨著浮動利率放款發放量增加,Pathward 目前呈輕微的資產敏感型。財務長 Gregory Sigrist 估計,升息 25 個基點(1 碼)可為全年稅前盈餘帶來約 200 萬美元或稍多的貢獻,不過管理層預計資產負債表將隨時間逐漸恢復中性。
管理層表示,經濟成長趨緩可能會擴大營運資金與資產基礎放款的機會,因為傳統商業借款人會尋求替代融資管道。管理層並指出,合作夥伴自行申請銀行執照並不會構成重大威脅,部分原因在於合作夥伴基礎多元,且無任何合作夥伴貢獻超過 5% 的收入。
完整法說會逐字稿
完整財報電話會議逐字稿
管理層陳述
Operator
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to Pathward Financial's Fourth Quarter 2026 Investor Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Darby Schoenfeld, Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Darby Schoenfeld
Thank you, Operator, and welcome. With me today are Pathward Financial CEO Brett Pharr and CFO Gregory Sigrist, who will discuss our operating and financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year of 2026, after which we will take your questions. Additional information, including the earnings release, the investor presentation that accompanies and supplemental slides may be found on our website at pathwardfinancial.com. As a reminder, our comments may include forward-looking statements. Those statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual and anticipated results to differ. These statements speak only as of this date, and the company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as may be required by applicable law. Please refer to the cautionary language in the earnings release, investor presentation, and in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent filings, for additional information covering factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Additionally, today we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures on this conference call. References to non-GAAP measures are only provided to you to assist in understanding the company's results and additional information regarding these non-GAAP measures as well as reconciliations are included in the earnings release and the appendix of the investor presentation. All time periods referenced are fiscal quarters and fiscal years and all comparisons are to the prior year period unless otherwise noted. Now let me turn the call over to Brett Pharr, our CEO.
Brett Pharr
Thanks, Darby, and good evening, everyone. Thank you for joining our earnings call. We're looking forward to sharing our updates today, but I'd like to start by taking a moment to reflect on an important milestone. This quarter marks five years since my first earnings call as CEO of Pathward. Looking back, it's remarkable to reflect on everything the Pathward team has accomplished. We have navigated the challenges of COVID, rebranded the company as Pathward, expanded our executive team, and strategically reshaped our balance sheet, all while evolving our business and strengthening our position as a trusted platform that enables our partners to thrive. Through each chapter, one thing has remained constant, and that's the dedication and commitment of our employees. Our success has always been rooted in our people. Every day, talented employees across Pathward work with customers and businesses to enable financial availability, choice, and opportunity. Their unwavering commitment to true partnership is what has enabled us to adapt, execute, and continue delivering for all of our stakeholders. I'm very proud that we've continued to sustainably grow while staying true to our purpose of powering financial inclusion. That is not a coincidence. Our purpose continues to guide our strategy, and we believe that this diligent focus helps drive long-term value for our shareholders. And while I find tremendous value in times of reflection, I'm even more excited about what lies ahead. We have a strong foundation, a team that embodies our values and is committed to success, as well as a clear strategy to guide us forward. With that, let me spend a few minutes on our strategy. Then I'll provide a quick update on credit before turning the call over to Greg. Fiscal 2026 was another important year of execution for Pathward. They successfully advanced their strategic priorities we set out to accomplish last year, and this was by no means a small feat. We had some major wins across each area, starting with maintaining an optimized balance sheet. Commercial finance growth combined with reductions in our lower yielding securities portfolio reflects our disciplined approach while remaining cognizant of our balance sheet capacity. We deployed capital where we believed to provide us with optionality or generated strong risk adjusted returns. We made significant inroads in the Small Business Administration loan market, moving up within the top 20 SBA 7A program lenders in the country. We continue to make investments in technology, risk, and compliance. We believe these continued investments will allow our partners, both present and future, to deliver with confidence as they leverage our expertise, infrastructure, and collaborative support. The world is only moving faster, and we are proud to enable our partners by offering a broad suite of capabilities. Furthermore, we are very proud to have been recognized by a few different organizations throughout the year for our standout workforce and culture. We believe part of our success can be attributed to our Talent Anywhere approach. Through this talent strategy, we have been very successful in expanding our reach beyond local candidates as a remote-enabled employer and strengthening our ability to meet the evolving needs of our business. The last strategic priority is the client experience. We believe our partners see the value in Pathward's platform and our ability to grow alongside them. Last quarter, we announced that we had renewed our relationship with Clair, a company that has empowered workforce management and payroll platforms to offer early access to earned wages to employees at no cost to employers. This quarter, we are pleased to announce that we've renewed our contract with longstanding partner H&R Block, extending our relationship through mid-July. H&R Block has been a leader in the tax preparation industry for more than 70 years with a deep commitment to their clients, associates, and community. We are excited to continue to support them. We still see significant opportunity in our pipeline with both new and existing partners to build on this momentum by expanding the products and capabilities we deliver. As we look ahead to fiscal 2027, our strategy will remain consistent. We believe the continuity in our strategy reflects the confidence that we have, both in the direction of the business and the progress we have made throughout fiscal 2026. Our focus is now on continuing to execute against these areas and building momentum across the organization. Importantly, we believe our diversified mix of partners, products, and capabilities remains a key differentiator of Pathward. We are not dependent on a single partner, industry, or market, which we believe delivers a resilient business model while providing multiple avenues for growth. Our broad suite of solutions allows us to create opportunities, deepen relationships, and deliver value. As a result, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on the opportunities in front of us. We continue to work through the renewable energy projects that we mentioned last quarter and still believe we have line of sight to bringing them to completion. While we made significant progress during the quarter, these things take time. We will continue to provide transparency in connection with these credit items. Additionally, we continue to believe that these events are not indicative of a broader systemic issue within the portfolio. Aside from credit, we are very pleased with the results of the year. Now I'd like to turn it over to Greg, who will take you through the details of our financials and fiscal year 2027 guidance.
Gregory Sigrist
Thank you, Brett. We were pleased with the performance during the quarter as our core businesses delivered solid results. Starting with the balance sheet, our Treasury-led model continues to deliver with growth of nearly $6 million in net interest income from our commercial finance business. We also delivered double-digit percentage growth in non-interest income, primarily due to an increase of almost $8 million in card and deposit fee income, the majority of which was driven by growth in the core payments business. Non-interest expense improved in the quarter as a result of disciplined expense management with lower legal and consulting expense. This is partially offset by building and software expense. Additionally, we will continue to make targeted investments in our people, processes, and technology to facilitate evolution and scalability. Aside from the credit items Brett discussed, we are pleased with our full year results and equally important, how our teams delivered them. Their focus, collaboration, and consistent execution throughout the year drove strong performance across the business. Interest income growth in commercial finance was nearly $30 million, driven primarily by an increase in structured finance. Solid partner growth combined with disciplined expense management led to full year net income of $175.7 million or $8.14 of diluted earnings per share. With that, our return metrics remain strong, with a 230 basis point return on average assets and a 32.9% return on average tangible equity. We believe that these results reflect the quality of our business model, discipline of our teams, and consistent execution, not to mention our capacity to generate earnings and to create capital to cover events as they arise. We believe this continues to differentiate Pathward and provide a strong foundation as we enter fiscal 2027. While deposits held on the company's balance sheet at September 30th experienced a modest decrease versus a year ago, we held more than $400 million more in average custodial deposits. As a reminder, we do earn fee income on custodial deposits that is tied to the effective Fed funds rate. Average partner deposits were strong in the quarter, giving us the ability to generate additional servicing fee income. Loans and leases at September 30th grew 9%. We continue to be successful in growing structured finance, term lending, and SBA and USDA loans, as well as working capital asset-based lending. Adjusted net interest margin improved to 551 basis points in the fourth quarter as we continue to improve our earning asset mix and see the benefit of repricing. Year-over-year loan originations increased from $1.3 billion to $2.2 billion, driven primarily by significant growth in our credit sponsorship business from both a new contract signed last year and expansion with current partners. Regarding credit, the non-performing loans and lease ratio did increase modestly to 5.61% sequentially. While there are always normal flows in and out, the increase was largely attributable to additional work being done to bring certain credits to completion. Net charge-offs were $52 million in the quarter, of which $20.3 million was associated with commercial finance portfolio. We continue to expect credit to normalize in 2027 as we work down our non-performing loans. The strength of our balance sheet, along with our earnings and capital accretion power, allows for return of capital to shareholders. As of September 30th, our liquidity was $3.1 billion, and during the quarter, we were able to repurchase approximately 282,000 shares at an average share price of $88.75. For a total of over 2 million shares, for the year. This leaves 2.8 million shares still available for repurchase under the current stock repurchase program. We are reiterating our fiscal year 2027 guidance range of $9.50 to $10 per share, which includes the following assumptions: No additional rate changes during the year. An effective tax rate of 18 to 22%. Expected secondary market revenues between $5 million to $7 million per quarter, and includes expected share repurchases. Lastly, a comment on expenses. As we have said, we will continue to invest in people, processes, and technology. In prior years, that has largely shown up as an investment ramping throughout the year. For fiscal 2027, we expect those investments to begin in the December quarter. This will manifest as additional hirings in the first quarter that will increase the compensation and benefits run rate earlier in the year, but will still hold the normal seasonal pattern. Similarly, we will continue to use consultants with modestly elevated spend in the first half of the year. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the line for questions.
Operator
We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Tim Switzer with KBW. Tim, your line is now open. Please go ahead.
分析師問答
Timothy Switzer
Hey, Tim. Sounds like good progress on the partnership side, now it's on H&R Block and Clair and some other ones recently. I'm curious on, you know, where do you think the new partners will be coming from, specific industries and is it more on the credit sponsorship side, embedded finance? You know, the card and debit business. We'd love to get an update there.
Brett Pharr
Yes, so I, I think there's a variety of ways. It's pretty broad. One of the things we could emphasize is our diversified business model and product set. And so it's all of the above we're seeing. And we've said it before, a lot come from potential new partners. And also, an awful lot of our increase in revenue comes from existing partners. But there's not one that I would single out and say that it is a higher percentage of it. This is all about the breadth and depth of our offerings. And our partners really want understand that and be a part of it.
Timothy Switzer
Okay. Um, and do you guys feel like there's any areas right now we need to invest a little bit more in to keep up with the competition in the BaaS and embedded finance space? Where are you directing most of your investment dollars right now?
Brett Pharr
Greg, I'll get you to talk about this a little bit, but I mean, we've said for a while that we've been in our run rate investing in technology and enhancing the infrastructure and the backbone.
Gregory Sigrist
Anything you want to add to that? No, I think that's right. I mean, it's more just staying contemporary with their clients to really help them support their own, you know, endeavors. And as I said in my prepared remarks, we also invest on the risk and compliance side because with the onboarding we've done and just the increase in the volumes today and in the future, we just want to make sure that stays, you know, state of the art and stays at the strength that we've had historically. So that's just an area we want to make sure we stay ahead of.
Timothy Switzer
Okay. That's helpful. And I want to ask a few on the credit side here. With the charge-offs this quarter, and I guess in the last few, which were – some of them were in the renewable energy space, were there any specific verticals or industries that these are concentrated in this quarter?
Brett Pharr
No, none specific that we would call out. Um, and, you know, a lot of this is related to transactions that we've already talked about before as we work through the process. Um, so there's not anything new or any new kind of asset classes that we would bring to the table and say we're seeing things here.
Gregory Sigrist
Yes, and Tim, I think the key point there with Frederick, yes, I think the key point which you really touched on though is that the elevated charge-offs and frankly still the NPL and the NPL ratio, it's concentrated in the credits we've already talked about. And I think importantly, we're making resolutions. You saw the past dues have declined. That's important to see too, and we've not seen any evidence that it's going to be if there's any other issues spreading across the portfolios.
Timothy Switzer
Okay. I mean, I guess with the charge-off this quarter, we still see NPAs staying around the same level. Should we expect further charge-offs? Starting next year what, you know, what kind of assumptions should we have.
Brett Pharr
Keep in mind, and we talked last time about a number of um the projects that we were going to take over and have to lead to completion. That means you fund the projects and then eventually complete them, get them producing, and then you sell them. Well, for the existing portfolio, when you fund some of that construction, those dollars go into non-accrual until you sell the product.
Gregory Sigrist
Yes, but specifically on charge off the ten, you have to separate and differentiate the charge offs from when you take and how that kind of dovetails with the lifecycle Brett just mentioned, right? The charge offs you're seeing a result of, you know, specific reserves that we've taken in prior quarters, and you have to differentiate that against our ongoing credit cost of, you know, credit, right? Which is what we provision for. You know, we talked about last quarter. We see credit normalizing into 2027 and what that really means is the cost of credit which is our credit provisioning is getting I feel it's going to migrate back to our historic levels. The charge offs are a bit more episodic and they're tied to the idiosyncratic loans that we've talked about over the last year, frankly, but it's a byproduct of just the natural progress of working through some of those.
Timothy Switzer
Okay, all right. My last one here, and Greg, you just touched on this, but what kind of provision expense expectations are embedded within your guidance for 27?
Gregory Sigrist
Yes, I touched on it last quarter too, and where I said we would normalize back to kind of the historic run rate. And I think I said this last quarter too. What that really means is if you focus solely on the commercial finance portfolio, the historic ACL ratio has been, you can see it in the deck, it's in there, but it could be down roughly 120 to 130 basis points is probably a normalized level. I think that's the starting point. And then anything up or below that's really just going to be a more of a function of the mix of new production. What you saw this quarter, frankly, the provisioning in the quarter is really just provisioning for new, you know, for new for loan growth. Upon what that mix was. And that's the way I kind of see next year playing out is more akin to that 120 to 130 basis point range.
Timothy Switzer
Okay, since you're already near those levels, it seems like the provision going forward to be more for loan growth rather than credit deterioration.
Gregory Sigrist
Based upon the facts we have right now, that's exactly the way we're feeling about it.
Timothy Switzer
All right. Good to hear. Thanks for taking all my questions.
Operator
Thank you. Your next question from the line of Joseph Yanchunis with Raymond James. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Joseph Yanchunis
I'm doing well. So new originations, you know, increased pretty meaningfully this quarter, you know, largely driven by credit sponsorship and you'd reference growth with existing partners. How much of that growth represents a new normalized run rate versus potentially some acceleration-specific programs? I'm just kind of curious what you're seeing in the pipeline today that gives you confidence in that continued growth.
Gregory Sigrist
Yeah, I believe that really represents the new run rate based upon the programs and the partners we've announced and onboarded. And I think, you know, we tend to ramp into those programs more rapidly than an issuing partner or acquiring is pretty rapid, too. But I think that's the new normal. And from here, it's really just growth in partner programs and then growth in the partner base.
Joseph Yanchunis
That's great to hear. Um and then Brett, you know, having completed five years of earnings calls for Pathward and congratulations for that, I was hoping you could talk a little bit about the next five years. And what do you think the themes will be in the BaaS space and, you know, how do you expect consolidation in the regulatory environment will play out?
Brett Pharr
Well, so I think it's a broad set of things are there. Obviously there's lots and continual change in all kinds of payments products. I mean, if you think about where we were five years ago and the products that we offered and provided and then what we offer today is vastly different. And I think five years from now, there will be a lot more of things that are, let's say, not just issuing and interchange related. Uh and that's going to continue to advance. Some of which are the products we're already doing, some of which are products that we don't even know about or that are coming. We've got to let all that play out. We've got to let AI play out. That's going to have a material impact on our industry. I think it's going to be more on the customer front end ultimately and how that shows up. So that's going to be a big part of think of five years out. And I think we're in a period of time where some are looking at vertical integration. We're going to see if that's right or wrong, and I'm not sure. I think there are pros and cons to that, and so I think we'll watch that play out. That won't be five years, that'll be two years, and we'll watch as that plays out. You know, very optimistic always been about third party delivery and about people being creative, innovative, entrepreneurial, upfront with the customer, and then us providing the infrastructure. The backbone behind the customer service is obviously wrapped in risk and compliance. And I just think that's a fabulous business model for whatever is coming. So excited about the future and you know, we lead based on what our partners lead into. And so we watch them and what they're doing. Then we help sort for them to do that and often co-create and I think we'll keep doing that.
Joseph Yanchunis
You mentioned the budget and your answer then, I've been on the past probably five, six, seven calls with you guys. With more fintech, chartered and banks, you mentioned the Bertel integration, your answer there, and I believe this question has come up on the past probably five or six earnings calls with you guys. With more fintechs considering their own charters and more banks building BaaS capabilities, the hardest aspect for a competitor to replicate? You know, do you think it's the regulatory infrastructure, product breadth, technology, or just the relationships?
Brett Pharr
It's the culture. Culture matters and there is a distinct reason that banks do banking, and our program managers do what they do. And by the way, you can't hire culture. You have to spend a lot of time creating it. And I think the best business model has worked because the banks had the bank culture and the program managers had the program manager culture. I think we've already had in the past household names that you know that tried vertical integration and failed. Now some of them as we go forward, we'll figure it out. Some of them have narrow based charters that can let him do some things, and so it won't be quite as hard, but the full, the vertical integrated model, I think it's hard to get up every day and have a culture that meets the needs of a banking infrastructure in the background and all the things you need on the front end as a program manager. And as I said, you can't hire that.
Gregory Sigrist
That's a good point.
Joseph Yanchunis
And one more for me here to bring Greg kind of back in the fold. The securities portfolio continues to wind down. Now it's under $1.2 billion. You have about another $150 million cash flowing in fiscal 2027.
Gregory Sigrist
Where would you like to see the portfolio settle out? You know, we still keep it there largely as a reservoir of liquidity just in case we need it. You know, it's pledged. We borrow against it. That's part of, you know, how we fund tax season. But the reality is, I think we can let that run down to the $800 million to perhaps a billion dollar range, and it'll settle out there. You know, we're in that environment, though, where rates are. Said, historically, we'll take that $140 or $150 million of principal off the portfolio and reinvest it back into the loan book. The reality is, though, there's probably a benefit for us to buy a few securities along the way, just to give us, you know, in the event there is a down rate scenario, a bit of coverage on the OCI front. I wouldn't say it's going it's going to be a lot, but I would say there might be a little bit there. But that's still, in my view, we're going to normalize around that $800 million to a billion.
Joseph Yanchunis
All right, great. Well, thank you for taking my questions.
Gregory Sigrist
Thanks, Joe.
Operator
Your next question from the line of Manuel Navas with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Manuel Navas
With this higher rate environment, can you kind of talk through – and also you had a NIM rebound this quarter. Can you just kind of talk through what are some of the expectations from the September hike? How a potential December hike could impact your EPS trajectory. And also maybe touch on is this how this could show up potentially down the road in credit?
Gregory Sigrist
Let me tackle the first one first, then I may hand off to Brett so we can do a little tag team here. But I'll break it down maybe just broadly on the adjusted net interest margin, how I think about headwinds, tailwinds there. And you touched on the September hike, the possibility of a December hike. But more broadly, we have been fairly neutral from an asset liability perspective. So each 25 basis point rate cut or increase has been pretty close to, pretty negligible. The balance of 2026 did shift a little bit of new production toward floating rate loans, particularly tied to prime. So that's put us at a moment in time at a slightly asset sensitive position. So from this point, if we have a 25 basis point raise in December or the next meeting, perhaps $2 million pre-tax, maybe a little bit more for the full year. But I point out at this point in time because a lot of that new production came from the uh the renewable space, from the infrastructure space, and it's in the construction loans. And I think we're probably at a high water market where those are going to be. So over time, as that portfolio comes down, and also the Treasury teams looking over the next, you know, notifying timeline. But I think we'll get the assets back to neutral, you know, certainly over the next couple of years. I don't think there's a long term trend. I think it's a short term trend, but it's a trend that's helpful at this point in time, just given where the rate environment's going. I think the other tailwind, though, we've talked about this consistently, is just the middle part of the curve. You know, roughly 35% of the of the book and new production is fixed rate loans, which price off of the three to five year part of the curve. And with the curve, you know, five year had, you know, touched 5% and backed off a little bit. You think about the loan portfolio, which is currently book yielding around 3% and you assume that we're taking $100 or $150 million and and recycling that's a pretty large tailwind for us as we continue to do that. Not to mention the fixed rate loans in the book that are continuing to reprice because some of those still came on pre 2022, which has been really great. You're obviously over time going to have some offsets. You know, cost of deposits will go up a little bit, but it's going to be more than offset with the rate environment. Did that make sense? I'll assume yes, because you might be on mute.
Brett Pharr
I'll hand it over to Brett. Yeah, I think the other part of your question is really is what does higher rates for longer mean from a credit perspective or an economic standpoint? You've got to remember our asset-based lending and working capital portfolio actually benefits during that time because the commercial traditional C&I borrower that was at a high level that bank now is even being either pushed out of the bank or cannot get credit and so then they start looking for alternatives and that's where we step in and actually during higher rate and economic stressed environments where we get the better quality credit in the asset based lending and working capital portfolio. So I only see that kind of. It's kind of a dark view, but I only see that as a positive. When the economy slows down, we'll pick up more opportunities in that space. Higher interest rates do have an impact in the energy infrastructure portfolio because you have to use a higher capital cost. It impacts the value of the tax equity throughout the life cycle of the project, so more equity will have to come in. But these projects have such high rate of return that the incremental impact of the interest rates is not going to stop the projects. I'll just reframe the capitalization that goes in up front. So I don't expect there to be much there. The, you know, the consumer loan originations, um, you know, our partners are operating in a space that's not the credit. Uh, and as I often say, these people are always in a recession. Uh, and so the interest rate costs are not going to be very material in that space. And they may be repaying it with benefits payments rather than income payments, but they'll repay it anyway because of where they live and the and you know, the part of the economy that you're in. So, I'm not worried about an economic downturn. I actually think our credit. are built for those kinds of things they assume an economic downturn.
Manuel Navas
Is there a sort of a certain level of rate increases that you think would start impacting the demand for your product, your partner's origination levels, and where it would impact some credit. Is it like 100 basis points from here? Just trying to ballpark that.
Brett Pharr
Yeah, I mean, you know, let's suppose that prime goes up 200 basis points, that is going to slow down, um, commercial business. And that is exactly where we would excel in the working capital and the asset-based lending. And as I said, the 200 basis point increase in rates in the the alternative energy electricity infrastructure arena, it will change the economics, but because they're so rich, there will still be valid projects. You'll just structure them differently. So I don't expect that we will be impacted by a slowdown in that regard. In fact, in some ways we might be positively impacted by it.
Manuel Navas
Okay, that's helpful. I appreciate that. Just about thoughts on your partner population. Do you have a sense of any that are actively pursuing national security?
Brett Pharr
The national charters? We have had conversations where a small subset of them have talked about it and may be pursuing it. But it's one of things you gotta remember. If you're a private equity firm, is very difficult to become a bank holding company. And so there's an awful lot of them that are in that category. And it may be an exception here or there, but there's not any circumstance where we're having any kind of material threat from a partner because of it.
Gregory Sigrist
And part of that is just the lack of concentrations in that partner base in the first place.
Manuel Navas
That was going to be another question. I appreciate that, your commentary that you're not dependent on any one customer. Do you have a sense for at some sort of metric that you can track that? What's like your top three, top five, top 10, uh, partners.
Brett Pharr
Yes, so let me give you this number. No partner represents more than 5% of Pathward revenue.
Manuel Navas
Okay, I appreciate that. Is um one thing, one area that's been uh quite strong is that is the card. It kind of bounces around quarter to quarter, but there's very solid year-over-year growth. How should I think about that fee line over the next year?
Gregory Sigrist
Yes, if I heard the question on the card fee income line, I mean, Karen, I'm going to ask you to CD off balance sheet.
Manuel Navas
Yep, that I, yes.
Gregory Sigrist
Yes. I think really what you're looking at right now is really sets the mark for going forward, and I think any variations from there are really just going to be volume based from here with the partners we're onboarding, onboarding the pace, and the like. So I think what you're seeing now, but keep in mind too, there's always seasonality in that line as we bring on deposits in the fourth quarter, spin them out in the March quarter. The quarter on the second quarter. So you're going to see the normal seasonality in that, but there's always kind of a you know, the ebb and flow, there's always a low watermark as the tide comes in and out.
Manuel Navas
And then just one kind of wrap up question on credit for me. How do you view, you have the rest of the tax services, kind of you ended that for the year, kind of the net charge-offs there. How do you kind of view that next year? I feel like you've talked in the past about how that business performed better on credit. Do you have any other kind of look back on that that you can apply for next year in your in terms of the tax services business itself.
Brett Pharr
So I think we've said that for the last several years we have continued to improve our underwriting, and that has shown up in the numbers. We'll maintain the gains that we have gotten, but I doubt we'll continue to improve at the same degree every year. So I would hope it is some better, but not as much better as it has been in past years.
Manuel Navas
Okay, I appreciate it.
Operator
Thank you. Your next question from the line of Tim Switzer with KBW. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Timothy Switzer
Hey, thanks for letting me back through the queue. Greg, you actually just kind of answered one of the questions I had in terms of the seasonality. Obviously, we're going to get the bump in first quarter next quarter, but has the seasonality for the rest of the quarter changed at all? Like, for example, a really strong fourth quarter, where it's typically be, you know, the down mid to high single digits, at least historically. It has growth from any individual partner or like the onboarding of new partners change that at all.
Gregory Sigrist
I think it's really the onboarding of, you know, new products and then new partners, new products and just that continued March of, you know, multi-threaded opportunities. That flattens out the seasonality a bit. I think with the prepaid card business though, you still see. You still see deposits grow in the December quarter, and then you see the fee income, core fee income in the March quarter. I think you'll always see that. But I think the continued march toward diversification of both products and partners helps to take away some of that seasonality, particularly in the fourth quarter. I think that's what you've seen when you track back, There is one nuance though. I mean, we talked about this last quarter a little bit. You know, we do receive some contractual, you know, volume based incentive payments, which can hit one quarter versus the next. And that was kind of the explanation last quarter for why when you did the year over year, fiscal 2024 was a little above, 2025 is a bit above fiscal 2026. For full year basis, we feel like we're going to get those incentive payments, but that could skew one quarter to the next. That would be the only caveat to what I just said.
Timothy Switzer
Got you. Okay, that that makes sense. Just qualitatively, are you able to kind of parse apart the acceleration we've seen year over year in fiscal 2026 on the card fees? Like how much of that is driven by new programs, new products, new partners versus, um, all older ones that were already in place in 2025.
Gregory Sigrist
I think you're always going to see for the foreseeable future. Growth year over year is still going to be driven more by existing partners. And I think when you think back over the last four to six or eight quarters, it's um a combination of just, you know, their putting on new programs, but also adding new multi-threaded products to the mix. And I think that's still, historically, that's probably been 75% to 80% of the And part of that is, you know, the new partners typically take a bit more time to onboard plus, part of which is going through the third party onboarding process, which takes some time. And we talked about how once we've gone through that process, it's a lot easier then to do multi threaded with new partners. But when I think out the next 12 months, I think it's still revenue growth still largely going to come from perhaps a bit more uplift from new products with those partners, but brand new partners typically, unless it's you know credit sponsorship, which we can get onboarded a little faster. Acquiring you can get those ramping a little faster, but if it's issuing business that typically takes longer. It's usually an uphill, part of the issuing they would have to ramp into those new programs, which really means you're talking the subsequent fiscal year before you really start to see uplift from that. But you know the partners in the pipelines have been talking about for new partner growth that is just tailwind for us, you know, exiting 2027 and going into 2028 and 2029.
Timothy Switzer
Got you. Okay. Thank you so much.
Gregory Sigrist
You're welcome, Tim. Thanks for coming back.
Operator
We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Brett Pharr, CEO, for closing remarks.
Brett Pharr
Thank you for joining the call this evening. We hope you have a good night.
Operator
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review.
本文部分內容由 AI 生成和翻譯,並經人工審核,僅供參考且做為一般資訊用途,不構成投資建議。









