Knightscope (KSCP) 2026 年第二季財報電話會議:營收創 900 萬美元新高
Knightscope 公布 2026 年第二季營收達 900 萬美元,年增 228%,創下單季新高。毛利改善至 70 萬美元,實現連續第二季正毛利率。營業費用增至 1380 萬美元,淨虧損擴大至 1410 萬美元。現金及現金等價物為 820 萬美元。營收增長主要受 Security Force 收購案、核心機器人訂閱與緊急通訊裝置部署驅動。管理層預期 2026 年第四季進行 K7 初步部署,於 9 月推出全自動安防部隊及 Signals 平台,並持續整合硬體、軟體與安防人員以提升長期營運效率。
重點總結
- Knightscope 公布 2026 年第二季營收創下 900 萬美元的新高,較 2025 年第二季的 270 萬美元成長 228%。成長反映了收購 Security Force 的整季貢獻、核心全自動安防機器人訂閱服務以及緊急通訊裝置的部署。
- 毛利改善至 70 萬美元(約占營收的 7%),優於去年同期的毛損 90 萬美元。這是該公司連續第二個季度實現毛利率轉正。
- 營業費用從 540 萬美元增加至 1380 萬美元,主要是受到下一代技術開發、員工人數增加以及 Security Force 整合成本的推動。淨虧損從 630 萬美元擴大至 1410 萬美元。
- Knightscope 在本季末擁有 820 萬美元的現金及現金等價物,服務範圍涵蓋 42 個州的 434 家客戶。
- 管理層預計將於 2026 年第四季進行 K7 的初步部署。公司還計劃在 9 月的 GSX 2026 上推出全自動安防部隊,並開始初步推出 Signals 編排平台。
- 該公司正在將硬體、軟體和持牌安防人員整合為一項託管服務。管理層的長期目標是在規模化後實現約 50% 至 60% 的綜合毛利率,但同時表示達到該水準仍需要時間。
關鍵財務結果
| 指標 | 2026 年第二季 | 2025 年第二季 | 變動與評論 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 營收 | 900 萬美元 | 270 萬美元 | 成長 228%;創公司單季新高 |
| 毛利(損) | 70 萬美元 | -90 萬美元 | 連續第二個季度實現正毛利率 |
| 毛利率 | 約 7% | 負值 | 受到 Security Force 收購案以及各技術產品線毛利率擴張的支撐 |
| 營業費用 | 1380 萬美元 | 540 萬美元 | 因研發、員工人數增加以及收購整合而增加 |
| 淨虧損 | -1410 萬美元 | -630 萬美元 | 包含約 100 萬美元與或有對價估值變動相關的其他費用 |
| 每股虧損 | -0.79 美元 | -0.90 美元 | 每股虧損有所改善 |
| 現金及現金等價物 | 820 萬美元 | 820 萬美元 | 管理層表示,收購後現金週轉期正在改善 |
業務與營運表現
收購 Security Force 是營收成長的主要驅動力,並為整個季度的毛利做出積極貢獻。Knightscope 正將收購的人力安防業務與其全自動機器人、軟體和遠端監控能力相結合。
管理層強調了在公司 434 家客戶群中的交叉銷售機會。Security Force 客戶可以採用 Knightscope 的技術,而現有的技術客戶則可以增加武裝安防人員、非武裝安防人員、高階主管保護服務或預計推出的 H1 可穿戴裝置。
提高營運效率的舉措包括將某條產品線的組裝時間縮短了將近 80%。Knightscope 還透過在地提供商重組了北加州和東北部的現場服務,同時將南加州的現場服務改為內部營運,以降低交付成本並提升服務水準。
K7 全自動安防機器人已通過 Alpha 原型機階段審查,並進入 Beta 原型機階段。Knightscope 繼續以 2026 年第四季進行初步部署為目標。卡內基梅隆大學的機器人研究所也在該公司的工程指導下研究全自動巡邏技術。
Signals 平台的開發正在進行中,該平台旨在協調全自動機器人、固定式裝置、感測器、增強型安防人員以及 Mission Intelligence 遠端監控。該公司還在為其安防人員開發 H1 可穿戴裝置。
管理層展望
管理層確定了 2026 年下半年的四大優先事項:
- 於 2026 年第四季開始 K7 的初步部署。
- 在預計於 9 月 14 日至 16 日在亞特蘭大舉行的 GSX 2026 上正式推出全自動安防部隊。
- 開始初步推出 Signals 軟體編排平台。
- 繼續改善每季的營運與財務表現。
該公司未提供具體的營收或盈餘預測數字。管理層重申了讓每一季表現都優於前一季的承諾,同時也承認這仍是一個極具挑戰性的執行目標。
風險與關注焦點
隨著 Knightscope 投資研發、擴充員工人數並整合 Security Force,營業費用大幅上升。研發支出年增 390 萬美元,反映了 K7、H1 和 Signals 的開發工作。
單季淨虧損包含約 100 萬美元與收購或有對價的公允價值及其變動相關的其他費用。未來的估值變動可能會影響財務報告結果。
管理層強調,收購成功取決於交易完成後的整合,特別是人員、流程和企業文化的磨合。整合後的全自動安防部隊所追求的經濟效益,也取決於規模、交叉銷售以及逐步轉向更高毛利率的技術與軟體。
問答環節重點
全自動安防部隊經濟效益:管理層表示,傳統警衛服務的毛利率可能在 10% 到 20% 左右,而規模化的軟體則可達到 67% 至 80%。根據對長期客戶的分析,Knightscope 指出五年期內的毛利率約為 50% 至 65%。其綜合服務的長期目標約為 50% 至 60%,但管理層強調達到該水準仍需要時間。
潛在收購:Knightscope 描述了三個感興趣的領域:Security Force 的附加型收購、具有現有客戶和現金流的遠端監控業務,以及軟體、演算法、感測器或工程團隊等技術資產。管理層表示將保持嚴格選擇,因為整合決定了交易是否能創造價值。
客戶留存與擴展:管理層指出原 Security Force 客戶群的留存率十分強勁。公司計劃優先在現有客戶中進行擴展,包括將技術交叉銷售給警衛服務客戶,以及將安防人員服務交叉銷售給純技術客戶。
營運槓桿:Knightscope 正在整合包括財務與人力資源在內的功能。管理層預計共享的基礎設施和遠端監控能力將能支援更多客戶,而不會帶來同等比例的固定成本增加。
法說會逐字稿全文
完整財報電話會議逐字稿
管理層陳述
Apoorv Dwivedi
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining Knightscope's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. I'm Apoorv Dwivedi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and I'm joined by William Santana Li, Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
By now, you should have had a chance to review our second quarter 2026 earnings release, which was published at 1:05 p.m. Pacific Time just after markets close.
Before we begin, please note that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our goals, growth, prospects, product road map and outlook. Actual results may differ materially due to the risks and uncertainties described under Risk Factors in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K as updated by our other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them, except as required by law.
With that, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Bill.
William Li
Thank you, Apoorv, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for spending part of your day with us. I'm going to start with the business and marketing highlights from the second quarter, what we won, what we built and how we're setting up the second half of the year. Then I'll hand the call back over to Apoorv, who will take you through the financials in detail. So let's dive right in.
The second quarter of 2026 was the best quarter in Knightscope's history. Revenue came in at $9 million, up more than 200% from $2.7 million in the same quarter last year and a new quarterly record for the company. We now serve 434 clients across 42 states. That marks 2 consecutive record quarters following first quarter revenue that was up 106% year-over-year. Back in May, I stood in front of institutional investors in New York and made a simple commitment, each quarter better than the last.
We have delivered exactly what we said we would do. In the second quarter, we built on the momentum from the first quarter of 2026, and we believe that we have laid the groundwork to keep it going forward. This compounding effect is a result of relentless commitment to execution across the entire organization. Apoorv will walk you through the drivers behind those numbers in just a few minutes.
The integration of our recent acquisition, now known as our Security Force, is proceeding as planned and the collaboration between the teams is amazing to witness. Seeing firsthand the team collaborate on our new H1 wearable that will define the future Augmented Security Agent, or ASA, is truly, truly invigorating. The teams are operating and beginning to work as one as we look to expand our offerings with our current client base. This was our second acquisition as a public company and the discipline the team has shown, closing it, filing it and now integrating it without missing a beat, tells you a lot about the caliber of the team.
More importantly, it strengthens exactly how we intend to differentiate Knightscope, the unique combination of hardware, software and humans delivered as one managed service. This team has been working on efficiencies and delivering tangible results, including cutting the assembly time for one of our product lines by almost 80%. We've grown the depth of our technical team significantly as we're seeing interest in Knightscope grow significantly.
We restructured our field service network in Northern California and the Northeast region by building relationships with local service providers and by insourcing field services in Southern California to provide better services while lowering our service delivery costs. We also strengthened the leadership in the company, recruiting multiple senior executives with a track record of scaling companies. Growth with discipline, that is the operating model.
The K7, our all-new autonomous security robot, passed its Alpha Prototype gate review, and we remain on track for initial deployments in the fourth quarter of 2026 as we move into the Beta Prototype phase. In April, we announced our partnership with Carnegie Mellon University, the top robotics institution in the country, whose graduate robotics program is now working directly on autonomous patrol technology under the guidance of our engineering team. We're taking a disciplined approach to the K7's market introduction focused on success in the field. Client interest in the K7 deployment continues to grow.
Simultaneously, significant work is well underway on an all-new Signals platform designed to orchestrate our autonomous robots, stationary devices, sensors, augmented security agents and our Mission Intelligence remote monitoring, an industry first that combines pioneering proprietary 3D digital twin technology with AI agents to eliminate blind spots and provide an auditable trail for proof-of-work, hardware, software and humans working as one, one team, one force.
Now let me spend a few minutes on the brand because security is not sold, it is adopted through trust and building trust at a national scale requires showing up everywhere, with clients, with the media, with communities, with recruits and with Wall Street. This quarter, we sharpened our positioning. Knightscope is a managed service provider, the only company uniquely combining hardware, software and humans into one integrated offering. We are building the nation's first Autonomous Security Force. That message resonated strongly with institutional investors during our non-deal roadshows in New York, and its momentum is building.
The team has been hard at work preparing for GSX 2026, the security industry's largest gathering, September 14 through the 16th in Atlanta, Georgia, where we will officially launch the Autonomous Security Force on the biggest stage in our industry. If you're attending, come and see us. One more signal of momentum. In June, we hosted a career night at our headquarters here in Silicon Valley, and it was literally a line around the building to get in. The best people in the country want to work on this mission, and we're hiring the best of the best.
With that, I'll turn it over to Apoorv to take you through the numbers.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Thanks, Bill. Revenue for the second quarter was $9 million, an increase of 228% compared with $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2025 and a new quarterly record. Growth was driven by the full quarter contribution from the Security Force acquisition in addition to our core ASR subscriptions and ECD deployments.
Gross margin was $0.7 million or approximately 7% of revenue compared with a gross loss of $0.9 million in the prior year period. This marks our second consecutive quarter of positive gross margin, driven by a full quarter impact of the immediately accretive Security Force acquisition and margin expansion across both technology product lines, demonstrating that our integrated technology plus services model is structurally more profitable than either business alone.
Operating expenses were $13.8 million compared with $5.4 million in the second quarter of 2025, primarily driven by investments in R&D to support the development of our next-generation technology as well as increased headcount across all departments and the integration of the Security Force. Despite the $3.9 million increase in R&D expenses from last year, the acquisition improved our operating leverage by adding higher-margin revenue and leveraging our existing operating infrastructure. We expect these benefits to continue and strengthen as we achieve our new product development milestones.
Net loss for the quarter was $14.1 million or $0.79 per share compared with a net loss of $6.3 million or $0.90 per share in the prior year period. This was primarily due to the higher OpEx highlighted earlier as well as approximately $1 million in other expenses related to the fair value and the change in the fair value of the contingent consideration or earn-out due to the seller of the recent acquisition.
Turning to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $8.2 million. This is flat to prior year and with an improving cash conversion cycle due to the effects of the acquisition.
In summary, record revenue, immediately accretive margins from the acquisition, expanding margins from maturing machines and network and service efficiencies and continued discipline in expense management, the financial profile of the company is strengthening in step with the operational execution Bill described earlier.
And now we'll open it up to Q&A.
Apoorv Dwivedi
So Bill, I -- what I'll do is I'll read the questions to you.
William Li
You give me all the easy questions.
Apoorv Dwivedi
I'll give you all the easy questions.
William Li
All the hard questions go to you, the really bad ones.
Apoorv Dwivedi
We'll send an e-mail. So the first question from the Autonomous Security Force strategy, bundles machines, software and licensed human agents. What are the unit economics? What (sic) [ Why ] is the blended ASF contract more profitable per client than a stand-alone robot lease? Bill?
William Li
Okay. I think we start off where humans can't do everything and technology can't do everything. But that combination is extremely, extremely powerful. And so what we need to think about is how do we solve the problem for the client, not trying to optimize margins for individual discrete items. If you go pull just the contracts and the margins for traditional guarding unarmed, they're not very attractive, right?
They're positive, but they're not software margins. If you're able to scale software, you're 67% to 80% gross margins. Probably on the low end, you're 10%, 20% on the human guarding side. If you're able at scale, and we've done this, remember, we did the analysis of our longest-standing clients, like you're somewhere in the 50%, 60%, 65% gross margin over that 5-year period.
So the Jedi mind trick is to be able to land with what a Chief Security Officer would [Technical Difficulty] today, which are licensed armed and unarmed agents, and then over time, become that trusted adviser, hey, we've operated at your facility for quite some time now. I wouldn't really stretch the staff that way. You might want to consider based on the data that we have. You might want to shuffle some things around and add some technology, maybe pay the team more appropriately. And over time, I want to see -- and it's going to take some time to scale, but I want to see us in the 50%, 55%, 60% gross margin net when all said and done.
And again, we need to focus on solving the client's problem and stop -- as I keep driving my team crazy, stop selling widgets. Don't -- please buy my robot, please buy my sensor, please hire my agent. We really need to focus on positive outcomes for our clients, hopefully, significantly improved quality and over time, reduce those costs. So the last bit I would say, it's deter. You want to deter negative activity before it occurs. And that could be a human presence, it could be a technology. You want to be able to detect. Mostly that's technology where you're able to do, say, superhuman capabilities that a human wouldn't be able to process.
Then you need to actually respond. You're saying, hi, let me -- all these alerts and stuff and you don't respond or 90% of the alerts are false, kind of problematic. But the key here is the data wheel is being able to learn over time. So deter, detect, respond, learn, improve the algorithms, improve the technology, improve our standard operating procedures and over time, you become that much more effective for the client. And if you do that really well, that client will tell the next client.
Apoorv Dwivedi
And I think part of that also is going back to the outcome. So unit economics work when we're selling to a traditional audience, and we kind of are, but the expectations are traditional, "oh, I'm going to go buy a camera, I'm going to go buy a guarding service, I'm going to go buy access control, I'm going to go buy something else." And each one has its own unique unit economics...
William Li
Or the cameras doesn't -- don't talk to the...
Apoorv Dwivedi
Right.
William Li
Guard. The guard doesn't talk to the remote monitoring team. The remote monitoring team doesn't talk to the investigation team. Why is the Chief Security Officer having to manage 8, 10, 12 different vendors? They're all very competent in invoicing you, but can you actually account for everything that happened with an auditable proof-of-work and a track record of everything that happened at that location?
Apoorv Dwivedi
Yes. And I think that's what will prove out is that a solutions-based sales approach takes away the unit economics and focuses on outcomes.
Next question is, what is the appetite for additional M&A? And what criteria would you be looking for in a potential transaction? Is the incremental revenue the priority or something else?
William Li
Okay. So I've -- this recent acquisition was the 25th in my professional career doing deals. As I often say, the deal part is actually, relatively speaking, easy. It's the day 1 and integration after is going to make or break a deal. So you got to be very careful what you pick.
I think it probably sits in three buckets. The first bucket, there's probably -- somebody is going to do the research here, but plus or minus maybe 8,000 guarding firms in the U.S., plus or minus, maybe 6,000 have more than 100 employees, I believe most of them owned by boomers that are retiring. The kids don't want to take over the business. And the large big box staffing companies aren't likely to buy them. So you literally have an illiquid market, which is an interesting dynamic for doing a roll-up.
I think if we're a private equity shop, you'd look at the recent acquisition as you bought a platform company. You've got a growing company, a strong management team, actual results and something that you want to build on. So I think there's opportunities for us to organically grow the Security Force. Maybe there's some bolt-on acquisitions as we get further along. So that's the first bucket.
Second bucket, we've been actively looking at remote monitoring companies. This could be immediately accretive because that remote monitoring company likely does not have a Security Force component and likely does not have a technology or robotics component, but does have a client base cash flowing and we could be highly synergistic. Again, we need to be kind of a little picky here, make sure we're careful, but we've been shopping for that.
I think lastly, we live here in Silicon Valley, 22,000 start-ups, as I often say, some of the most brilliant minds in the world, backed by millions and sometimes billions of dollars. Literally, 95% fail. And so there's all kinds of goodies and assets sitting around at any point in time. It could be a piece of technology. It could be a particular algorithm. It could be a sensor. It could be a team. So we're always on the lookout there.
So those would be the three buckets: continued inorganic growth on the Security Force side; remote monitoring opportunities that are likely to be highly synergistic; and then the last one would be on the technology side.
Apoorv Dwivedi
I would probably even go a little bit to kind of summarize that if you think about our strategy, which is hardware plus software plus humans, right? We're really good at the hardware. The hardware, we have. The humans pieces, we're working on that, and that's where the opportunity is. And the software is where the opportunity is because, again, there are so many people working on some really brilliant technologies and analytics and software that if we can find the right one to plug in, why don't we do that?
William Li
Yes. And then again, if you go on our brand-new shiny website at knightscope.com, it literally says on the homepage, "For you, the Chief Security Officers of the United States of America." And so any decision that we would be making would be in your interest for us to build the most powerful Autonomous Security Force offering to really fix the clients' problems and frankly, our nation's problems.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Next question. Let's talk about clients. Can you give your perspective on client retention, renewals among the legacy Security Force client base?
William Li
I'm sure this is not 100% accurate, but one of the reasons we made the acquisition was very rarely to 0 have the Security Force lost the client. They may have fired a client, which is different. But the retention has been really strong there, I think, one. I look at our client base, we're now 434-plus clients across 42 states.
If you go to our -- there's a new investor updated deck. If you go to ir.knightscope.com, our new IR site, you can pull that down. I think there's a slide on there that reflects something to the effect of, if you take the top 5 of the 434 clients, their security spend is on the order of about $850 million. So what is the easiest sale you're ever going to get? Frankly, an existing client. So I've been very much focused on thinking through strategies and approaches on how do we leverage the 434 and see what good we can do for them. And along the way, we've met a lot of folks that are struggling with the existing kind of setup.
So there's going to be primary focus on existing clients, with some additional new clients as we go along. But the opportunity is certainly there. It's taken a very long time to go build the foundation to make all of this happen. But this is a unique opportunity in time and a unique company. This is a managed service provider for physical security that's never existed. And knowing what we know, let's just say everyone in the building is in good spirits.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Right. Yes. Number four, can you expand on the meaningful synergies from the Security Force acquisition? This is an easy one.
William Li
It is easy? Meaningful synergies. So I think we want to look at it from a few different angles. Obviously, you've seen the numbers. There's a significant component on the revenue growth, triple-digit growth 2 quarters in a row is kind of not normal. And over time, Wall Street will begin to learn that you cannot ignore a company growing triple-digit in a market with a $230 billion TAM and working on robotics and AI and a unique set of humans in the loop. Like that's not something you're going to be able to ignore. The best thing that we can do, continue to improve the financial performance of the company, continue to grow, communicate, communicate, communicate. But at the end of the day, we know we're right. We just need to execute.
So in terms of the synergies, there's 434 clients. So you might imagine a large portfolio of nationwide blue-chip clients that have only had Security Force kind of footprint, I guess, pun intended, and no technology. So there's a significant opportunity for -- we already landed. Let's go expand and be very thoughtful about, okay, please tell us what issues you're having, not by generalities, that particular address in that particular location, what incidents have you had? What's the budget? Where are you struggling? How can we be helpful? Have you thought about X, Y and Z? What's the lighting look like? What's the signage look like? Try to be that thoughtful trusted adviser that hopefully, we can win that trust over time and go expand with technology.
Similarly, you're kind of cross-selling, doing the other way. So we have a lot of clients that have only technology, that have an existing security, I'll say, staffing model with a lot of the big box staffing companies and aren't too particularly fond of the quality of service. And so for us to say, "Hey, listen, we offer executive protection. We have armed agents. We have unarmed agents. We will be unveiling the H1 wearable here shortly. So we'll have augmented security agents that no one in the industry will have. How can we help you with that?" So there's that kind of cross synergy, is really important.
And I think the second one -- the third one, first was financial, second cross-selling. A third is just cultural. One of the most difficult parts of M&A is, again, not just the integration, it's people. It's people, people, people and trying to get everyone in the same boat, rowing in the same direction is not easy. Sometimes public companies have to do stuff that a normal private company would never do and vice versa. And so little by little, we got to kind of get that to work. But I'll say this in good form. The Security Force team is highly disciplined, command and control, follow orders and off you go.
The kind of original technology side of Knightscope, Silicon Valley, scrum, let's kind of pie in the sky, think about how we're going to do this, let's collaborate and all this other thing. And for us to be successful, it's not one or the other. You actually need to think about how to do this so that you can get the best of both worlds. You need to add some discipline, command and control on a little bit too much of a loose process. And then at the same time, you can't stifle everything, right?
I don't know if it's going to be true, we're going to end it. We're going to find out. But my gut tells me that it's probably 2/3 command and control because we're going to have a very large footprint out in the wild, and you can't just tell an agent to say, "go be autonomous, do whatever you kind of feel is" -- that's not going to work. But at the same time, the Security Force team has so much knowledge, experience and relationships and insights from the industry and that influence on the technology. We're already seeing some benefits of that. We actually have agents here today testing out the prototypes for the H1 wearable. And so I think that's where 1 plus 1 equals 7.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Yes. I agree. I think on the top line, if you think about our go-to-market strategy, we're uniquely positioned to go after that outcome-based approach, which we think we have the right positioning to do so.
Simultaneously, as we've talked about this, if you look at the P&L below the gross margin, the OpEx side, we're already integrating finance, integrating HR, integrating -- So those synergies in the -- those shared services model internal to the corporation allows us to kind of do some of the cultural things that you were talking about.
William Li
And financially, I think it's also really important that in order to be public, it costs literally millions of dollars, right?
Apoorv Dwivedi
Absolutely.
William Li
And just because we add more revenue and more capabilities, more everything, we can now sweat the assets that we have. So a crude example would be like if we had solely one client, but we needed to remotely monitor the health of those machines and the security aspects of it, you still need four people to run 24/7, right? It's not -- But if you added 30 more clients, do you need to 30x 4? No, you don't need to do that. So there is some scaling as we add -- there's more efficiencies as we continue to scale and you're not going to quintuple the marketing department because you quintuple the revenue, right?
So there's a lot of leverage coming. And as we committed during the recent non-deal roadshows, every quarter is going to be better than the last. And that's a tall order. We've been working very hard, and we've got 2 quarters to prove it. We just need to keep at it.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Question on pipeline. Any thoughts on -- I know we don't share pipeline data, but it looks like we're getting asked for some indication.
William Li
I think the best thing for us to say is we have 434 clients. Somebody can go do a guesstimate with Claude or whatever. I might have done that, I don't know. There's not an auditable number because it's literally a guesstimate from AI. But those 434 is probably $3 billion to $6 billion of annual security spend. If five is $850 million, right, you can imagine it's somewhere in the billions range.
So I think that's the most important focus. And then we need to focus on the technology itself. We've got a lot of -- we're at all-time high, as Apoorv noted, on expenditures in R&D. Why is that? Well, we've got an all-new K7 that everyone is really excited about. It takes time and money to go do that. We've got an all-new H1 wearable that's going to go on our agents, and our agents only. That's going to also take some time and money.
We've got the all-new Signals platform, a piece of software that's going to orchestrate everything, hardware in terms of the robots, the stationary devices, the sensors, plus our agents, plus our Mission Intelligenceremote monitoring, that piece of software is an industry first. This is like literally, we're going to remotely monitor a location in three dimensions. This is going to be absolutely exhilarating and invigorating to showcase this at GSX and actually put it into the field, not a science fair project. So all that R&D is going to have, I think, a very handsome return on investment over the coming years.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Absolutely. I think the last question is, somebody asked, I would love to hear Bill's thoughts on when he believes the public will catch on and the stock price will rise?
William Li
Oh my. Like I said, despite all the e-mails, texts and voice mails, I don't control the stock price. You do. So all I can do and the team can do is improve our financial performance of the company. We can grow the company, and we can communicate, communicate, communicate. The rest is literally up to the market. And I'll just restate what I said earlier, if you think about where the company is going, we have all the pieces, all now beginning to get integrated into one holistic managed service provider. We know that this is a massive pain point for this multibillion-dollar industry. And so if we just focus on fixing the damn problem, like you're going to get rewarded for it.
So the best thing the team can do is continue to focus on execution, top line revenue growth up, cost of goods down, careful with our fixed cost basis, scale things up and get the technology to do magical things that no one in the industry is going to be able to do or can do, and then put the numbers up on every Q and every K. And then the way the stock should, should respond is simply on the numbers. And that's why we urge you to look at the changes from all these years prior to what happened in the first quarter, what happened in the second quarter and now start thinking what the third, fourth quarter and next year is going to look like.
We are building something extremely special and all the pieces of the pie are -- all the pieces of the entire puzzle are falling in together. And I've literally -- and this is not the founder being the founder and kind of glass half full or building a glass factory. I've never literally been this excited about Knightscope's future in all 13 years of my career here. We've got an unbelievable team. We've got unbelievable technology. We've got existing clients. We just need to focus on execution. And on that last point, how you derisk the execution side? You hire brilliant people.
Apoorv Dwivedi
Absolutely. With that, I think this concludes our Q&A. I'll hand it back to you if you have any comments.
William Li
Thank you, Apoorv, for doing this. Let me leave you with this. In the second half of the year, we expect to deliver on these four things: first, initial K7 deployments in the fourth quarter; second, the official launch of the Autonomous Security Force at GSX in September; third, the initial launch of Signals, our software orchestration platform; and fourth, the same thing you've seen in the last 2 quarters.
So thank you to our clients for their trust, to our shareholders for their support and most of all, to the absolutely relentless Knightscope team, one team, one mission, one [Audio Gap].








