
In this podcast, Motley Fool contributors Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Rachel Warren discuss:
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
A full transcript is below.
Before you buy stock in Shopify, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Shopify wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $414,554!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,120,663!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 884% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 193% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of February 17, 2026.
This podcast was recorded on Feb. 11, 2026.
Travis Hoium: Is AI disruption coming for every corner of the market? Motley Fool Money starts now. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Travis Hoium I'm joined today by Lou Whiteman and Rachel Warren. We got to start with some of the big topics of the week. This is a heard of earning season. There are dozens of companies reporting every single day. One of the big things that popped out to me this week was actually Spotify, a company, we don't talk about a whole lot, but you may be listening to us on Spotify, but they are increasing their prices, once again, they did that in January. I got my notice this week, and that's actually really helping their financials so that's the good news. But my question for you, Lou, is this is something that we've seen with a lot of these companies. Netflix, you see constant price increases for Disney Plus, I assume that's coming again for ESPN, every single one of these subscription services, is that the long term play now for these companies? Is Hey, look, there's nowhere really else for you to go, so we're just going to keep slowly jacking up these prices and increasing our profits. As investors, you're not getting the organic growth that you once got, but the bottom line might be getting better.
Lou Whiteman: I think the answer is yes and no. I think some historical context is needed here. These original prices, the ones we're comparing it to, they were set artificially low at the beginning as loss leaders and that was funded by VC funds, which, in turn, were funded by basically zero rates. There was free money, these businesses use that free money to try to gain share so now the price hikes look dramatic off of that. But I don't think that we can say necessarily that what has happened over the last few years is going to be repeatable indefinitely into the future. Spotify doesn't have unlimited pricing power, $22 a month for a family plan is not unreasonable, there's room to grow from there. Travis you say, there's no choice, there is choice. There's Google there's Apple, there's a lot of other choices. As long as they are all stepping up together, I think it's fine. But if Spotify said the heck with it, 50 bucks a month, I don't think that would work out well for them.
Travis Hoium: The strategy has to be like a boiling frog.
Lou Whiteman: Yeah, and if so, I think it does make sense because again, we started artificially low. I do think that there will be pullback at some point. I think it's interesting because you can say that Netflix has specific things and if you want to watch, I don't know, Squid Games or something, you need Netflix. Spotify, I know they're trying with podcast and stuff, but basically, everything that people actually want to hear on Spotify, they can get elsewhere. If anything, I'd say long term, they have less pricing power, but certainly they can continue this trend for a while, because it's not unreasonable, and it is a product people want.
Travis Hoium: Rachel, is this the trend that we're going to is you get into these ecosystems, even with something like Spotify. I have a family of five my kids both have accounts on Spotify. Sure, I can switch but there is switching costs that are involved, too. For investors, the good news here is these go from money losing companies. They were growing quickly, Spotify was growing quickly for a decade but it was losing money. Now we're going to, Hey, they're printing cash flow, and that ultimately is what you want to do as a business.
Rachel Warren: These results also underline the fact that customers are willing to pay marginally more not maybe $25 more. But they're willing to pay marginally more for the quality content they're used to. I think it also really suggests that music streaming has transitioned from maybe what was once seen as more of a luxury to really an essential utility for a lot of consumers. I think this was really apparent in Spotify's results. There's really been this shift of focus from just pure subscriber growth to intelligent monetization strategies and profitability. You look at their fourth quarter results. Gross margin reached a record 33.1%. That was above analysts estimates. Operating income rose 47% year over year. Premium subscribers grew 10% year over year and you had about 3 billion in free cash flow for the entire 12 month period. We're also, I think, seeing a bit of a shift where companies like Spotify are really prioritizing average revenue per user over raw user acquisition. Now, Spotify has raised their prices in the US twice in the last 18 months. The CFO has noted that pricing is actually expected to outpace content costs in 2026 and I think it shows that users seem to be willing to absorb higher costs to keep their curated libraries, whether it's music, podcasts, or otherwise. This is a trend we're seeing in the space, platforms are increasingly consolidating their services. They're moving toward more cable like bundles, so to speak. It's funny to say that to sustain their margins. I think that this is going to have to be a very careful approach, though. Spotify seems to be executing it quite well. If they and others do too many of these price increases, though, you could have some subscription fatigue among the more budget conscious users. But for now, this is a strategy that seems to be working, and I think that that is really apparent in Spotify's financial results. This is a much better and stronger company than it was five years ago.
Travis Hoium: Lou, as we sort of think about what is going to be disrupted by AI and what isn't. Are these subscription businesses that do have the ability to raise the prices, even if it's $1 a month so Spotify, Netflix, Disney would fall into that. Is that going to be a safe haven for investors, because yeah, AI can do a lot of stuff, but it's just going to make a playlist for you so maybe Spotify is safer, maybe Netflix is safer than we thought it was a couple of years ago. The multiples are still high, but where else are you going to be?
Lou Whiteman: I think AI can make a pretty good playlist for you, and I think they're doing that already.
Travis Hoium: They maybe don't have the rights to the music, is the problem?
Lou Whiteman: That's what I was going to say. These are mostly pass through businesses where a lot of the creation is out of their controls. They are just a conduit for in this case, music. I do think that that holds up better. They're using AI, I don't know, I'm actually not a Spotify customer, but I can tell you that my music service uses AI to suggest things all the time for me.
Travis Hoium: Yeah, Spotify does that, too.
Lou Whiteman: I do think the other side of that, too, is that arguably the creators deserve more here. One day there could be a day of reckoning in terms of profitability, but that's something we'll handle down the line.
Travis Hoium: We will see what happens with all these subscription services, but I think the trend toward higher prices is something we're probably going to have to get used to. When we come back, we're going to talk about the latest retail sales data. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
ADVERTISEMENT: Monzo Business is Britain's most recommended business bank account for overall service quality. Recommended by businesses like Rocket Accountants of Essex so a salute to you, Rocket Accountants. Working with you is a blast. Make this switch and join over 800,000 other UK businesses already banking with us. Search Monzo Business today, service quality survey awarded 2025. Visit monzo.com/serviceresults. UK soul traders or limited company directors only. Ts and Cs apply.
Travis Hoium: Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Retail sales data came out this week, and we heard about what happened during the holidays. Sales were up 2.4% from a year ago, Rachel. But that was a little bit below analyst estimates of 2.7%. Lou's K-shaped economy appears to be here with layoffs in tech driven by artificial intelligence. Are we at risk of this retail sales decline continuing or what do you see here?
Rachel Warren: I think in the short term, that's very much a distinct possibility. There's a few reasons for that, but a lot of it also comes down to the disparity in spending power that we're seeing among consumers. You've got, as of late 2025, the top 20% of earners, and this includes households that earn over 150,000 a year. The top 20% of earners accounted for about 60% of all personal outlays. A lot of that spending is tied to gains in equity markets, there's AI related investment gains there. We're seeing this group as well shifting their focus toward higher end services, experiential, luxury. But then you've got households earning under $75,000 a year. That is a cohort of consumers that are seeing more meager growth and spending. A lot of that spending is tied exclusively to essentials. This is also a cohort that's struggling much more with issues like persistent inflation, record household debt. As you mentioned, AI has been responsible for a growing number of layoffs. There were about 55,000 layoffs or more in 2025 related to AI changes and efficiencies and we've seen that trend continue into 2026 think companies like Oracle, Amazon, Meta, Intel, the list goes on. You've got the combination of a softening labor market, not all of it is AI related to be clear and you've got the impact of tariffs. That's increased a lot of economic uncertainty. We're seeing businesses that are adapting in some ways. They're trying to target either extreme luxury or deep discount retailers. Some retailers are having more success than others. Some of those more mid tier retailers, like Target, continue to struggle while Walmart, which derives a lot of its revenue and growth from essential purchases like groceries seems to be doing much better. I think in the long run, I think the economy is going to come back stronger than ever. I think consumer spending power is going to improve. But I don't think that we can ignore these short term indicators and what they mean for consumers and for a range of businesses.
Lou Whiteman: It just seems to me that for every negative, there's a positive, so I don't know how much we can read into any of them. Are we at risk? Yes. But I don't think we should take that as a prediction. We should just take it as we're always at risk. We like to think about this as binary that either the consumer is good or the consumer is not good. Really, what this is is just the critical mass of every consumer out there. If enough individuals feel confident enough that they can spend, then spending is fine and economy is fine, if not, we're in trouble. It's always just some mix, whether it's 70, 30, 51, 49. It feels like that critical mass has shrunk, but that doesn't mean it continues to shrink or that we're in trouble. We just had a surprisingly strong jobs number. There's some asterisk there, and I don't know if it's as good as we hoped, but jobs are OK. Michigan's consumer sentiment is at a six month high. I don't want to read into that as gung ho, either, but there is a glass half full for every glass half empty right now, and I don't think as investors, we should get too caught up on anything or predict anything.
Travis Hoium: All of the disruption that was supposed to come from AI for the labor market, anyways, doesn't appear to be here yet so we will see if that continues throughout 2026.
Lou Whiteman: If there's one thing to watch and after all I said don't watch any of it, but if there's one thing, I do think pricing stability and that comes through with inflation numbers. We haven't had wild surprises. We're seeing inflation do exactly what economists thought it would. It's still up, it's not making life easy. Again, this is the shrinking critical mass, but if we can get some sort of pricing stability, I don't know why we can't just go on like this sort of indefinitely.
Travis Hoium: When we come back, we're going to talk about one of the shocking earnings reports or at least reactions from the market. That's with Unity Software. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
ADVERTISEMENT:
Neal Fischer: Hi, I'm Neal.
Ken Pendola: I'm Ken.
Neal Fischer: We are from the Triviality Podcast, a pub trivia style game show where a lack of seriousness meets a little bit of knowledge.
Ken Pendola: Join us each week for an hour long game of general knowledge trivia, featuring special guests from around the world. Plus, tons of extra themed episodes.
Neal Fischer: If you want to improve your trivia game.
Ken Pendola: Or you just want to scream at us in your car when we get easy questions wrong.
Neal Fischer: Then we're the show for you. Find triviality on all your favorite podcast apps.
Ken Pendola: But you know that because you're already listening to a podcast.
Travis Hoium: Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Let's talk about earnings in Unity. This is the AI disruption that I don't know if it's here or we see it coming, but Rachel, Unity actually reported pretty good numbers. I think they beat on both the top and bottom line. They had a little bit of weak guidance, but you missed that guidance right now. The stock's down 30% as we're recording, a wild reaction from the market. From a high level, what did you see?
Rachel Warren: Very strong response from the market. I think a lot of this is being driven by the board guidance they gave, which investors saw broadly as disappointing. I think they're still intensifying fears of AI driven disruption. Their forecast for Q1 revenue 480-490 million. That was a bit below Wall Street's consensus estimate of about 494 million. They also fell a bit short of Wall Street's expectations for their Q1 adjusted EBITDA forecast. A lot of this suggests that they're seeing a slower ramp up for Vector. Vector is Unity's AI powered advertising tool. They're looking at flat growth for their Unity 6 subscriptions in Q1. All of these are reasons why investors seem to be responding the way they are. The other big thing that's happened recently, and this is where we saw the stock plummet in late January was after Alphabet's Google unveiled project Genie, it's basically this generative AI prototype that can create interactive world models so this sparked some fears that Unity could be rendered obsolete. Unity is still unprofitable, but their revenue is growing. They're in a good position cash wise. I do think the price reaction is a bit of a knee jerk response to AI uncertainty. I'll note, AI World models are likely to expand, at least in my view, Unity's addressable market rather than replace it. Especially because you're at a place where professional game development really remains highly complex. They really need that platform that Unity has to monetize and advertise their games. I think it's important to look beyond the market response into the actual numbers.
Lou Whiteman: Sometimes it's just wrong place wrong time. I don't know if unity is 30% in trouble. It looks like the market is reacting, but what we do know is this is the wrong time to provide weak guidance. Quarter was great, but forecasting lower revenue in EBITDA at a time when there is hyper concern about these businesses, the market is seeing what it wants to see. All we know for sure is that the current business results are OK, if not better and OK. I thought it was a decent quarter. To extrapolate more than that, I think we're supposed to look to the future, so we do need to be aware of these threats. But in the near term, yes, there's a lot of assumptions being made, and all we really know that this business is chugging on and has threats and opportunities just like most stocks that you consider.
Travis Hoium: It does seem that the market is leaning toward that risk versus the opportunity side, and we've had a lot of stocks that were high growth stocks that would just soared in 2025. Now we're going the opposite direction in a very violent way. We'll see if that continues throughout 2026. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the Moley Fool's editorial standards, and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For Lou Whiteman, Rachel Warren, Dan Boyd, and Kristi Waterworth behind the glass, I'm Travis Hoium. Thanks for listening to Motley Fool Money. We'll see you here tomorrow.
Lou Whiteman has positions in Shopify and Walmart. Rachel Warren has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Shopify. Travis Hoium has positions in Alphabet, Intel, Shopify, Spotify Technology, Unity Software, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Intel, Meta Platforms, Netflix, Oracle, Shopify, Spotify Technology, Target, Unity Software, Walmart, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.