
In 2008, Walmart and McDonald’s were the only two Dow components to rise.
If a stock market crisis happened today, the higher valuations of these historically defensive businesses won’t serve investors.
After three years of double-digit returns in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), some investors may be throwing caution to the wind, and others may be looking more defensively.
While conditions don't appear to support a massive crash, pullbacks can and do occur. Investors who are defensive now may be tempted to assume history will repeat itself.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
History shows that during the last major financial crisis in 2008, just two out of the 30 stocks that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) were up: Walmart (NASDAQ: WMT) and McDonald's (NYSE: MCD).
Unlike 2008, however, conditions are different. Whatever causes the next market sell-off will be different. And these two defensive names won't be the big winners if we get another 2008-style meltdown. To see why, let's look at each company in turn.
As of Feb. 3, Walmart has joined the rarified list of companies with a $1 trillion market cap, a small club largely dominated by tech companies. Customers continue to flock to the company's stores, and Walmart continues its push to keep prices low, which has helped during the surge in inflation in the 2020s.
Over the past five years, the king of retail is up over 170%, returning more than twice the S&P 500's return of 75%.
Image source: Getty Images.
That kind of outperformance during a market rally doesn't guarantee worse performance than the market during a downturn. But it should give investors caution. Big returns on the way up leave little defensive downside protection.
On the valuation side, Walmart's market-crushing rally has come amid a rapid expansion of its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio over the years. In 2008, Walmart was valued at 16.5 times earnings. Today, investors are willing to pay 45 times earnings, or almost three times as much.
That's usually a valuation reserved for high-growth tech stocks, not retail operators with high costs and low margins as part of their business model.
In contrast, big-box retail competitor Target (NYSE: TGT) trades at 14 times forward earnings, or about one-third the valuation. Plus, Target pays a 3.9% dividend.
Walmart pays a paltry 0.7% dividend, its lowest payout since 2003 and well under its 10-year average of 1.8%.
It's true that during a market meltdown and weak economy, consumers may shift their spending from higher-end retailers to Walmart, whether out of caution or because the economy slides into a recession. But during a recession, earnings multiples like P/Es will contract heavily. Already trading so high, Walmart offers investors no margin of safety, especially with today's low dividend yield. Even competitors like Target would feel the pain with their lower valuation.
It may not take a recession for poor returns from here, either. A slowdown in consumer spending as unemployment continues to steadily rise could act as a shock to consumer stocks, even if trends like artificial intelligence (AI) spending continue to benefit the overall market.
In short, Walmart investors may not fare well in a downturn, following this outperformance relative to the rest of the stock market.
Many of the same challenges apply to McDonald's. The fast food operator traded hands at about 15 times earnings in 2008. Today, it trades at about 30 times earnings.
While not as extreme as Walmart, McDonald's is operating with a different set of challenges.
First, inflation-wary consumers miss the days of dollar menus at fast-food places. Fast food wasn't just supposed to be fast but also cheap.
Today, customers still get sticker shock ordering a burger and fries, a term dubbed "McFlation," as the prices of some menu items have more than doubled since 2014.
McDonald's is fighting a second front that Walmart isn't. Its competition no longer comes from other fast-food chains or even other restaurants in general. The rise of weight loss drugs such as Ozempic poses a threat to the company's customer base as fewer hungry customers opt to dine out.
Some equity analysts have even downgraded shares, citing the impact of weight loss drugs. Growth has been sluggish as the use of weight loss drugs has risen in the general population, including a notable 3.6% drop in same-store sales in the U.S. in early 2025, right as these drugs were hitting their stride.
So far, McDonald's has held up better than other fast-food brands. Competitor Wendy's (NASDAQ: WEN) fell by over 40% in 2025, compared to flat performance for McDonald's.
While McDonald's still remains a beloved brand, changing consumer tastes may not make shares the relative safe haven in a crisis that they have been, as consumers look for low-cost alternatives.
In the next crisis, there will be a handful of other companies that buck the market's downtrend -- there always are. But it's unlikely to include Walmart and McDonald's.
Both Walmart and McDonald's are great companies that have executed well in low-cost industries. And at the right price and valuation, they can be great investments, too. Yet, their valuation is simply too high today, and current challenges don't make them a slam-dunk investment for defensive investors.
For investors thinking defensively today, companies that thrived in 2008 may get dinged in the next bear market, whenever it hits.
Before you buy stock in McDonald's, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and McDonald's wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $429,385!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,165,045!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 913% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 196% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of February 12, 2026.
Andrew Packer has a position in McDonald's. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Target and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.