tradingkey.logo

Ireland, Finland, others warn against relaxing EU merger rules

ReutersFeb 23, 2026 3:47 PM
  • EU Commission to unveil revamped merger rules proposal by April
  • Current rules allow mergers if economic evidence supports it, countries argue
  • Claims of larger operators boosting investment are inconclusive

By Julia Payne and Foo Yun Chee

- Finland, Ireland, the Czech Republic and two Baltic countries have warned against loosening EU merger rules in response to calls by some companies for easier regulatory scrutiny of their deals in order to better compete with non-EU rivals.

The European Commission, which acts as the bloc's competition enforcer, is now revamping merger rules dating from 2004 and aims to publish proposals for feedback in April. The aim is to encourage pan-European mergers, sources have told Reuters.

The five countries, including Estonia and Latvia, wrote in a note seen by Reuters that Europe does not need to relax EU merger rules to create European champions because the existing rules already allow for these where the economic evidence supports it.

"Size in itself should not be the primary objective" of mergers, they said in the document that is to be discussed at a meeting of EU ministers on Feb. 26, calling to pursue "undertakings that succeed through efficiency, innovation and fair competition instead of exemptions or special treatment".

They refuted arguments, especially from European telecoms operators, that bigger companies would spur more investments, instead supporting regulators who note little evidence of such an effect.

"The empirical link between higher concentration and stronger investment incentives in telecom markets is at best inconclusive and should be analysed on case-by-case basis," the countries said.

They said claims that larger operators would have secure supply chains could backfire by making Europe too dependent on a small number of suppliers and thus less resilient.

"If strengthening resilience and secure supply chains is considered to require additional regulatory measures, these should be pursued through sectoral or industrial policy instruments rather than through changes to competition legislation," they added.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Related Articles

KeyAI