國家燃料天然氣 (NFG) 2026 財年第四季法說會：2027 財年財測指引與 Seneca 分拆

重點摘要

• 國家燃料天然氣公司（National Fuel Gas Company）公布 2026 會計年度第四季 GAAP EPS 為 1.02 美元，調整後 EPS 為 1.22 美元。全年度調整後 EPS 年增 9% 至 7.55 美元。
• 管理層發布 2027 會計年度 EPS 財測為 6.00 至 6.40 美元，此預測基於 NYMEX 天然氣價格每 MMBtu 2.85 美元的假設，較 2026 會計年度下滑 0.80 美元。
• 塞內卡資源（Seneca Resources）預估 2027 會計年度產量為 400 至 435 Bcf，以中間值計算大致持平。預期產量中有近三分之二已進行避險，加權平均下限價為每 MMBtu 3.80 美元。
• 隨著新管線擴建、供應公司（Supply Corporation）費率案以及收購的俄亥俄州公用事業對 2027 會計年度業績做出貢獻，受監管業務預計將走強。
• 國家燃料天然氣公司仍按計畫於 2027 日曆年下半年將塞內卡資源分拆為獨立上市公司。目標是在 2026 日曆年年底前首次機密提交 Form 10。
• 在油氣井表現不如預期及壓裂干擾影響 2026 會計年度產量與 2027 會計年度展望後，塞內卡資源計劃優先開發下尤蒂卡（Lower Utica）與泰奧加郡馬塞勒斯（Tioga County Marcellus）。

關鍵財務數據

業務與營運表現

管線與儲存

Tioga Pathway 與 Shippingport Lateral 擴建專案在會計年度結束後不久投入營運。管理層預期這兩項專案合計每年將增加約 3,000 萬美元營收。

Line N 系統升級仍按計畫預計於 2028 年底投入營運，預計每年將創造約 2,000 萬美元營收。國家燃料天然氣公司計劃在 2026 日曆年年底前向 FERC 提交 Section 7(c) 申請。

該公司還以約 500 萬美元收購了 Honeoye Storage Corporation。該資產增加了 5.9 Bcf 受 FERC 監管的儲氣容量，以及與田納西天然氣管線（Tennessee Gas Pipeline）的互聯。管理層看好將其與鄰近 Empire 系統相互連接的潛力。

供應公司（Supply Corporation）的新費率已於 11 月 1 日生效（若有超收需退款），同時其費率案的和解談判仍在進行中。

公用事業

國家燃料天然氣公司在賓州獲得了 1,000 萬美元的費率調漲許可。該命令亦重新設定了配氣系統改善費用（Distribution System Improvement Charge），使其能夠更迅速回收現代化投資。

在紐約州，系統現代化追蹤機制（System Modernization Tracker）的核准允許對符合條件的現代化支出進行即時成本回收。作為交換，該公用事業公司同意在至少一年內不提出費率訴訟案。

俄亥俄州公用事業收購案已於 10 月 1 日完成，該業務目前以 National Fuel Gas Distribution of Ohio 名稱營運。管理層預期，收購後的業務將使公用事業部門在 2027 會計年度的營業利益大致翻倍，這與費率基礎的增幅一致。

根據過渡服務協議，CenterPoint 將提供長達 24 個月的特定後勤支援服務。國家燃料天然氣公司的目標是在 2027 日曆年年底前完成整合並終止該協議。

塞內卡資源

塞內卡資源 2026 會計年度的產量受到多項因素影響，包括來康明郡馬塞勒斯（Lycoming County Marcellus）六口井井場表現不如預期、上尤蒂卡評估結果低於預期，以及下尤蒂卡油氣井之間的壓裂干擾高於預期。

該公司正將近期開發重心轉向下尤蒂卡這項高報酬資產。第三代（Gen 3）油氣井設計將成為 2027 會計年度多數開發計畫的基礎，因為更密集的第四代（Gen 4）設計並未能持續提供足夠的預估新增採收量來證明其額外成本的合理性，且可能增加壓裂干擾風險。

塞內卡資源預計在 2027 會計年度將 20 至 26 口井投入生產，其中包括約 8 口評估或測試井。產量預計將從第一季至第三季逐步上升，隨後在會計年度末有所回落。

管理層預期，隨著開發進一步集中於下尤蒂卡與泰奧加郡馬塞勒斯，產量將於 2028 會計年度重啟增長。該公司表示，以目前的鑽探速度計算，其庫存可維持 25 年以上，且 NYMEX PV-10 損益兩平點低於每 MMBtu 2.25 美元。

2027 會計年度預期產量的 90% 以上均有實體確定銷售和／或確定運輸合約支持。確定運輸運能的下一次重大增長預計將出現在 2029 會計年度初期。

管理層財測指引

產量展望包含了 10 月份因價格因素自願減產的約 3 Bcf，但假設未來不會再有額外減產。

管理層預期受常態性費用通膨影響，每單位現金成本將略微上升。DD&A 預計每 Mcf 增加約 0.05 美元，長期費率預計將回到 0.80 美元中高區間。

俄亥俄州的收購預計將對 2027 會計年度略有稀釋。賣方承兌票據的利率比國家燃料天然氣公司認為自身發行類似融資所能取得的利率高出約 100 個基點。

受監管業務的費率基礎目標仍維持 5% 至 7% 的成長率。管理層表示，該計畫不需要進行外部股權融資。

風險與關注領域

• 儘管擁有避險投資組合，但天然氣價格走低預計仍將對塞內卡資源 2027 會計年度的獲利與現金流造成壓力。
• 管理層預期天然氣市場至 2027 年仍將呈現某種程度的供過於求，但隨著 2028 年及以後液化天然氣（LNG）需求增加，市場前景將更為正面。
• 塞內卡資源的產量展望面臨營運不確定性，主要來自油氣井表現不如預期、上尤蒂卡產能以及下尤蒂卡壓裂干擾。
• 俄亥俄州業務整合以及塞內卡資源分拆籌備工作，將在 2027 會計年度產生一次性費用與非常態性財務報表項目。
• 分拆時程部分取決於美國證券交易委員會（SEC）對 Form 10 的審查進度，以及美國國稅局（IRS）私人書面裁決程序的完成情況。
• 在供應公司（Supply Corporation）的費率訴訟案尚未解決之前，新管線費率目前仍屬於可退還性質。

分析師問答集錦

管理層表示，2027 會計年度將完成塞內卡資源大部分剩餘的上尤蒂卡評估工作，同時將整體開發重心轉向下尤蒂卡及泰奧加郡馬塞勒斯。該公司預期，這種更具可複製性的開發組合將有助於提高資本效率，並推動產量自 2028 會計年度起重拾增長。

在確定運輸方面，塞內卡資源表示其當前運能與近期產量相當契合。下一次顯著增長預計將出現在 2029 會計年度初期，以支持公司的長期成長計畫。

第三方集氣業務仍屬於機會導向，而非轉向專門的第三方集氣模式。當鄰近產量能夠以具經濟效益的方式利用現有基礎設施運能時，塞內卡資源便會承接相關專案。

針對計劃中的分拆，管理層預計將在 2026 日曆年年底前首次機密提交 Form 10，並可能在 2027 年 3 月或 4 月左右進行公開申報。分拆目標仍定於 2027 日曆年下半年，且可能偏向該期間的前半段。

法說會逐字稿全文

完整財報電話會議逐字稿

管理層陳述

Operator

Hello, everyone. Welcome to the National Fuel Gas Company Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. My name is Rebecca, and I'll be coordinating the call today. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Ryan Vossler, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Ryan Vossler

Thank you, and good morning. We appreciate you joining us on today's conference call for a discussion of last evening's earnings release. With us on the call from National Fuel Gas Company are Dave Bauer, President and Chief Executive Officer; Tim Silverstein, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer; and Justin Loweth, President of Seneca Resources and National Fuel Midstream. At the end of today's prepared remarks, we will open the discussion to questions.

The fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2026 earnings release and investor presentation have been posted on our Investor Relations website. We may refer to these materials during today's call.

We would like to remind you that today's teleconference will contain forward-looking statements. While National Fuel's expectations, beliefs and projections are made in good faith and are believed to have a reasonable basis, actual results may differ materially. These statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and you may refer to last evening's earnings release for a listing of certain specific risk factors. With that, I'll turn it over to Dave Bauer.

David Bauer

Thank you, Ryan, and good morning, everyone. Last night, National Fuel reported strong fourth quarter results of $1.22 per share of adjusted earnings. Quarter capped off an excellent fiscal year for the company, one in which we generated adjusted earnings per share of $7.55, an increase of 9% over last year. More importantly, the past year will be remembered as a strategic inflection point for National Fuel. A little over a year ago, we announced a significant acquisition that would expand our utility footprint into Ohio and double our utility rate base. We've successfully closed that acquisition and are well on our way to integrating that business into our operations.

We also undertook an extensive strategic review that led to the decision to separate National Fuel into two stand-alone high-quality, publicly traded companies. Both companies will be well capitalized and well positioned to benefit from the broader long-term opportunities across the natural gas industry. Once completed, this separation will be an important step to maximizing the value of our assets.

Before discussing each of our business segments, I want to provide a few updates on the planned separation. As you read in last night's release, the new public company will operate under the Seneca Resources name. We felt that was important since Seneca is well known and respected in the communities in which it operates. Further, we remain on track with the key early separation work streams, including the Form 10 and IRS private letter ruling processes. In the coming quarters, we'll provide further updates, including information on the stand-alone business profiles, management teams and Boards of Directors.

Beyond the separation, fiscal 2026 was a year of significant progress across our businesses, further positioning each company for long-term success.

Starting with our Pipeline and Storage segment. This past weekend, we placed into service our Tioga Pathway and Shippingport Lateral expansion projects. These projects highlight the strategic position of our assets in the heart of the most prolific natural gas basin in the country. Together, they will add approximately $30 million in incremental annual revenues. In addition, the Line N system upgrade project that we announced last quarter remains on track for a late 2028 in-service date. This project is expected to add approximately $20 million in annual revenue while allowing us to modernize a key portion of our system. We expect to file our 7(c) application with FERC on this project by the end of the calendar year.

Looking beyond the Line N project, we continue to see interest in capacity from power developers and are optimistic we'll see -- we'll have further expansion opportunities. Also last week, we completed the acquisition of the Honeoye Storage Corporation. With a purchase price of approximately $5 million, this is a great little bolt-on for our pipeline business, bringing 5.9 Bcf of FERC-regulated storage capacity and an interconnection with Tennessee Gas Pipeline that provides access to premium Northeast markets. Looking ahead, we see the potential to further optimize this business by connecting it with our nearby Empire system.

Lastly, in the Pipeline segment, Supply Corporation continues to advance the rate case it filed at the end of April. Settlement discussions are ongoing, and I'm optimistic we'll reach an agreement. In the meantime, new rates went in place subject to refund on November 1.

Turning to our Utility segment. Last month, we received a final order in our Pennsylvania rate proceeding. As a reminder, given the political backdrop, we have been unable to reach a settlement with the parties involved and as a result, chose to litigate. In late July, we received a disappointing recommended decision from the administrative law judge, which we strongly opposed and rebutted. In its order, the commission ultimately took a more favorable view than the ALJ, awarding us a $10 million rate increase. Importantly, the order also reset our Distribution System Improvement Charge, which will allow us to recover on our modernization investments in near real time.

I'm happy to say that even after this rate increase, our delivery rates will still be the lowest in Pennsylvania. Our track record on affordability is something we're very proud of and will continue to be a focus area across all our jurisdictions. We also received a positive regulatory outcome in New York with the approval of our System Modernization Tracker in August. This will provide real-time recovery on our ongoing modernization investments, which are the bulk of our capital spending. In exchange, we agreed to stay out of a rate case for at least a year.

Turning to Ohio. On October 1, we closed on our acquisition and the business is now operating as National Fuel Gas Distribution of Ohio. As a reminder, our rate settlement contains two key capital spending riders that allow us to recover a return on nearly all of our Ohio capital spending between rate cases. As a result, we don't expect to file a rate case in Ohio until 2029 when those riders expire. To support a smooth transition, CenterPoint is providing certain back-office services under a transition services agreement for up to 24 months after closing. Our goal is to complete our integration and exit the TSA well ahead of that, ideally by the end of calendar 2027. Obviously, we're early in the process, but thus far, the transition is going as expected.

Overall, the outlook for the regulated businesses is outstanding. We continue to see success expanding our FERC pipeline systems. And at the utility, we see a path to continued rate base growth in all three jurisdictions without the need to file new rate cases through at least late 2028.

Switching to Seneca Resources. We remain confident in the long-term value of our deep high-quality inventory, particularly in Tioga County, where we've delivered strong results since shifting development focus there in 2023. However, we face a few challenges in the near term. First, natural gas prices have moved meaningfully lower over the past few quarters. We're nearly 2/3 hedged this year at prices well above the strip. But as Tim will talk about in more detail later, we do expect lower commodity prices will be a headwind for Seneca's earnings and cash flows in fiscal '27.

That said, as we look further out, the long-term outlook for natural gas demand is still strong, and we remain confident prices will recover. As Justin will discuss later on the call, we also faced some near-term challenges with respect to production that affected both fiscal '26 and our outlook for fiscal '27. But over the long term, we expect that Seneca's continued refinement of well design, development prioritization and operating practices should lead to a repeatable and capital-efficient development program. Most importantly, Seneca's inventory quality and ability to deliver long-term production and free cash flow growth remain intact.

In closing, in addition to delivering outstanding financial results, fiscal '26 served as a pivotal period in the nearly 125-year history of National Fuel. We took significant steps to position our businesses to maximize the long-term value of our assets and capitalize on the growth in natural gas industry occurring in our own backyard. I'm excited about the future and remain focused on executing on our strategy, which we believe will generate significant value for shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Tim.

Timothy Silverstein

Thanks, Dave, and good morning, everyone. Last night, we reported fourth quarter GAAP earnings of $1.02 per share and adjusted EPS of $1.22 per share. Our adjusted results were flat compared to the prior year. Increased utility margin and higher natural gas price realizations driven by our strong hedge book were offset largely by lower Seneca production. As noted in the earnings release, there were also several items impacting comparability related to the Ohio acquisition and the planned separation of Seneca Resources. We expect costs for both to continue through the next year as we work to complete the integration and prepare for the spin.

The rest of the EPS drivers are straightforward and laid out in detail in the earnings release. As it relates to fiscal 2026 capital, we ended up in the middle of our guidance range. The only thing I'd note is that in the regulated companies, we saw modestly higher pipeline storage spending, which was offset by lower utility capital. While we hit our utility modernization mileage targets, we did so at a lower cost per mile than anticipated.

On the pipeline expansion side, our projects came in on budget. Where we saw the difference was with the modernization work in Supply Corporation, where we were able to complete more than originally planned by the close of the fiscal year. We expect to be able to recover this spending as part of our ongoing rate case.

Switching to fiscal 2027, we've initiated our earnings guidance with a range of $6 to $6.40 per share. The major driver of the decrease year-over-year is our $2.85 per MMBtu assumption for natural gas prices. This represents an $0.80 drop in NYMEX prices from the prior year. Despite our strong hedge book, which protects nearly 2/3 of our expected production at a weighted average floor of $3.80, the steep drop in pricing will have a negative impact on earnings for the year. Consistent with past practice, we've included sensitivities at different NYMEX prices.

At Seneca, production is expected to be in the range of 400 to 435 Bcf, which at the midpoint is relatively flat year-over-year. Our guidance range incorporates approximately 3 Bcf of voluntary price-related curtailments in October, but does not assume these occur in the future. Justin will have more on the drivers of production later.

We are also projecting modest increases in our cash unit costs as a result of normal course expense inflation. DD&A is also expected to be up approximately $0.05 per Mcf. As I've talked about in the past, prior ceiling test impairments artificially lowered our DD&A rate in 2025, and it takes a couple of years for us to trend back to our expected long-term rate, which should be in the mid- to high $0.80 area.

Going in the other direction is the strength we are seeing in our regulated segments, most notably in our Pipeline and Storage business, where revenues from our newly in-service expansion projects and our pending rate case are expected to drive meaningful growth in 2027. In the Utility segment, we are also incorporating the expected full year impact of our new Ohio business. Our guidance highlights a doubling of operating income in this segment, which is consistent with the increase in rate base resulting from the acquisition.

We've also incorporated the impact of our acquisition-related financing, which we have been excluding as an item impacting comparability last year as we had yet to close on the transaction. As you may recall, we indicated that this acquisition would be modestly dilutive in fiscal 2027, particularly with the seller note carrying an above-market interest rate, which is about 100 basis points above where we could issue similar financing.

Overall, as we think about the long-term outlook, 2027 is a bit of a transitional year. The integration of our Ohio utility and the ongoing work preparing for the separation will certainly create a bit of noise in the financial statements, particularly as we will have a number of onetime expenses and nonrecurring items as we position each business to operate as a stand-alone public company.

Moving to capital. We project total spending to be approximately 10% higher than last year. Utility capital is expected to be in a range of $350 million to $400 million, which reflects the addition of Ohio-related spending. In the Pipeline and Storage segment, our range of $140 million to $180 million reflects mostly a modernization-only year of activity as our two major expansions were completed early in the fiscal year. We anticipate returning to a higher level of spending in 2028 as we begin work on our next Line N expansion. Overall, the spending level keeps us on track to deliver the 5% to 7% rate base growth we've previously discussed.

In our Integrated Upstream and Gathering segment, we are projecting to spend $600 million to $640 million, which at the midpoint is an increase of approximately $30 million year-over-year. While we are seeing modest inflation due to diesel costs, the increase is largely driven by third-party gathering activity, which will have an associated new revenue stream, along with nonoperated activity in Tioga County, which is incremental to our own development program. Outside of this guidance, we are projecting between $50 million and $100 million of discretionary land spending this year. We've seen great success with this program to date, deploying $38 million last year. Those who go through time, we retain the option to toggle this back if commodity prices remain depressed.

Our balance sheet exited last year right in line with expectations at 1.9x debt to EBITDA. This leaves us well positioned to navigate lower near-term natural gas prices. The long-term outlook for natural gas remains strong, and we continue to lock in hedges north of $3.50, a level at which we can generate meaningful free cash flow. Given our positive long-term outlook, we remain optimistic that our planned separation will provide both companies with strong financial foundations, which can position them for long-term success.

Bringing it all together, our underlying business fundamentals are strong. The regulated companies are executing at a very high level. Momentum continues to build around future pipeline expansion projects, and we are optimistic that we will reach a successful resolution to our Supply Corp rate proceedings. We also have a long runway of modernization opportunities in our utility business, all of which are underpinned by supportive rate-making mechanisms. Taken together, we can continue to deliver on our growth plans while staying out of rate cases in each of our jurisdictions for multiple years. And we can do this without the need for external equity financing. We see this outlook as a benefit to both customers and shareholders as we can deliver strong growth without dilution while also continuing our long track record on customer affordability.

At Seneca Resources, we expect this year to be a bit of an inflection point as all the work the team is doing to maximize long-term development value is expected to start to materialize later this year. We are laser-focused on optimizing our development, minimizing capital spending and generating sustainable and growing free cash flow. We're excited about the future and the broader evolution of National Fuel's business model, which we believe will benefit shareholders over the long term. With that, I'll turn the call over to Justin.

Justin Loweth

Thanks, Tim, and good morning, everyone. Fiscal '26 was an important year for our integrated Upstream and Gathering business. We generated more than $1 billion in EBITDA, increased our SEC reserve base to 5.2 Tcfe and replaced approximately 150% of production. However, our development program did not deliver the production we expected with full year production of 419.5 Bcf coming in just below the low end of our revised guidance range. Looking ahead, we expect fiscal '27 production to be approximately flat with fiscal '26.

Among the key drivers are underperformance on the Lycoming-Marcellus development pad, weaker-than-anticipated Upper Utica appraisal results and greater-than-anticipated frac interactions in the Lower Utica. Collectively, these had a modest impact in the fourth quarter and will have a greater impact in fiscal '27. We've taken a hard look at these results, adjusted our forecasting assumptions and incorporated what we've learned into our future development plans.

Digging in a bit further, I'll start with our Marcellus development pad in the Gamble area of Lycoming County, which was the most surprising of these results. This area is almost fully developed. And despite its significant production history and very strong historical results, this 6-well Marcellus pad meaningfully underperformed our expectations. We are still evaluating the cause but have not seen similar performance elsewhere in the region. With limited remaining inventory in Lycoming, we view this pad as an anomaly with no material impact on long-term value.

Turning to the Upper Utica, at the Taft 2 and Webster co-development pads, the wells are delivering solid results, although not at the exceptional productivity levels we saw from our earlier stand-alone Upper Utica appraisal wells. These results do not change our view that the Upper Utica provides attractive inventory, but they do change how and when we expect to develop it. With EURs of approximately 2 Bcf per 1,000 feet and attractive returns, we expect the Upper Utica to remain part of Seneca's long-term development plan, but the higher return Lower Utica will be our near-term development priority.

Lastly, we saw greater-than-anticipated frac interactions between offset Lower Utica wells. We are adjusting development sequencing, well design and operations to mitigate these interactions going forward. For instance, delaying the TIL of a well until offset completion activity is finished may allow us to maintain near wellbore pressure and reduce this risk. For fiscal '27, we plan to use our Gen 3 well design across much of the program. Based on our testing to date, the more intensive Gen 4 completion design has not consistently delivered enough incremental EUR to justify the additional cost and can increase the potential for frac interactions. We, therefore, expect Gen 3 or variations of that design to form the basis of our development program while continuing to optimize where appropriate.

While our development strategy is becoming more focused, fiscal '27 still includes targeted appraisal and optimization work already underway. Of the 20 to 26 wells we expect to turn in line, approximately 8 will involve appraisal or testing, including 3 Upper Utica delineation and infill wells, a 4-well Lower Utica pad testing GPU size to 40 million per day and a lower Utica appraisal well in a new fault block that could further expand our inventory.

Our remaining Upper Utica activity has specific objectives. Two wells will help determine optimal infill spacing around existing Upper and Lower Utica development, while a third well will test a new fault block where our data indicates the potential for higher gas in place. To execute this development plan, we expect to run a 1- to 2-rig program and a dedicated frac crew. Turn-in-line activity is concentrated in the second quarter, beginning in January with a 4-well Lower Utica pad with average TLL of approximately 18,000 feet, our longest Utica wells to date. With that TIL cadence, we expect production to increase from the first quarter through the third quarter before declining toward year-end.

The development changes we are implementing in fiscal '27 should position us to resume production growth beginning in fiscal '28 with development increasingly focused on our core Lower Utica and Marcellus in Tioga County. Over the longer term, we believe this more repeatable development approach will improve capital efficiency, supporting stronger free cash flow as production grows.

Turning to gathering. Our focus remains on supporting Seneca's production while maximizing the value of our integrated business. We are sequencing upcoming pipeline projects with Seneca's development schedule and employing new design standards that are already generating savings of 5% to 10% per facility. We are also advancing a new centralized station and associated pipeline corridor in Northwest Tioga, with construction expected to begin in early calendar 2027. We continue to pursue third-party gathering growth with volumes expected to remain relatively steady in fiscal '27 and additional opportunities being advanced in Tioga County. Together, these initiatives should lower costs and position gathering to efficiently support both Seneca and future third-party growth.

Pivoting to natural gas markets, we expect the market to remain somewhat oversupplied through 2027, with a more constructive outlook as LNG demand ramps in '28 and beyond. Our marketing portfolio positions us well in this environment, with more than 90% of expected fiscal '27 production supported by physical firm sales and/or firm transportation, leaving limited exposure to in-basin spot pricing. This provides meaningful protection during periods of regional price weakness while preserving upside as market conditions improve. That position was further strengthened by the recent in-service of the Tioga Pathway project, providing another valuable transportation outlet for Seneca's gas.

In closing, we see a clear path to long-term value creation as we continue to optimize our development program and expand our inventory. With more than 25 years of development inventory with PV-10 breakevens below $2.25 per MMBtu NYMEX at our current drilling pace, supported by our integrated gathering infrastructure, we believe we have the resource depth, economics and increasingly optimized development plan to drive long-term shareholder value. With that, I'll turn the call back to the operator to open the line for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions]

Your first question comes from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs.

分析師問答

Neil Mehta

Thanks so much for the rundown here. And I want to start with you, Justin, on Slide 18. This was very helpful in mapping out some of the challenges that you might be having in the '27 development plan. Maybe you can simplify it for us. What are the key things that you're looking to do in '27 during that transition year? And what is the confidence level that you're back on track by '28?

Justin Loweth

So the focus has been '26 had a lot of -- as I noted in my remarks, a lot of testing and appraisal work, a lot of focus on completion design in the Lower Utica, a lot of focus on the Upper Utica co-development. As we move into '27, we'll have more limited work in the Upper Utica and really completing that appraisal program and testing program. There's three wells that we have. One -- two of them will kind of come back in to help us understand long term how infill wells, whether it's adjacent to an existing Upper Utica or above longer producing Lower Utica, how those wells behave in productivity and so forth. And then another well that actually would potentially expand our inventory base more because it's into a new fault block where we have not included locations.

So those are key things there. Generally, though, we're overall pivoting to a Lower Utica and Marcellus-focused strategy. A lot of the things in 2027 were already in flight when you think about the long lead time nature of our integrated gathering and upstream business in that you're planning out 12, 18, 24 months in advance when you're building out those corridors and so forth. So a lot of it was in flight. But as we move to '28 and beyond, we will have much more Lower Utica as our core focus of the development. We'll have some Marcellus, very little, if any, Upper Utica. And that should lead to more consistent repeatable results, improving capital efficiency and a resumption of our production growth trends.

Neil Mehta

All right. That's great. And then Dave and team, obviously, it was a consequential week from a political perspective, including the states you operate in, Pennsylvania, Ohio. and New York at the gubernatorial level. So just your early perspectives on how we, as an investment community, should be thinking about some of these changes and any thoughts?

David Bauer

Yes. It was an interesting week indeed. At the state level, really, I don't see any change in New York. It's been a one-party rule state for a while. I guess on the optimistic side, I think the administration is starting to realize that gas isn't going to go anywhere anytime soon and has been less hostile towards us. In Pennsylvania, obviously, the Senate flipped Democrat, which isn't a positive for the industry. But at the end of the day, the Governor seems to be a pretty reasonable person. So I'm not expecting any real surprises there.

And then in Ohio, the governorship did go Democrat, but the House and the Senate are still very much Republican controlled. And so they have a long history of really supporting natural gas. They have a constructive regulatory environment and really don't see that changing. And overall, what I'd say is we build our business to go through the cycle, right? And so we'll have periods where we'll have politicians in favor of us and others where they're not in favor of us, but our business is designed to go through that cycle.

Operator

Your next question comes from Tim Rezvan with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Timothy Rezvan

I guess my first one is for Justin. I know you all have put out the 2030 outlook where you'll have basically 1.5 Bs a day of FT to support growth. Can you kind of walk through the timing of when that comes on? If you could just update us on that? And where I'm going with this is if the oversupplied conditions persist into 2028, how do you think about organic growth? And could you look to find third-party volumes to kind of meet that FT? Just trying to understand sort of the outlook.

Justin Loweth

Sure. So the FT that we have today matches our kind of existing and projected, I'll call it, near-term next year or so production quite well, protects us from some of these headwinds we're facing, frankly, on some of the in-basin pricing and overall. And that's, of course, buttressed by a really strong hedge portfolio, protecting the realized price.

Looking out to 2030, the next material increase in expected FT happens in early fiscal '29. So it's out there a little bit, more or less a couple of years. So we've got a plan that works towards utilizing that as that becomes available. So I think it all still ties together really nicely with our long-term projections. As I mentioned, '26 into '27, relatively flat production expected at the midpoint. And then as we move to '28 and principally a Lower Utica and Tioga Marcellus-focused program, would expect to see production resume growth and that continuing in the years beyond.

Timothy Rezvan

Okay. That's helpful context. I appreciate that. And then as a follow-up, you've mentioned a couple of times in prepared comments about initiatives on third-party gathering. It seems to be sort of an evolution of your strategy. Is this sort of related to the separation? Is this sort of an opportunity that you felt like you wanted to capitalize on? Can you talk more about that?

Justin Loweth

Sure, Tim. Yes. It's more happenstance than it happens to be now. We've been working with a third party for quite some time, and they had an opportunity to develop some resource that's proximate to our gathering system in an area where we could expand our gathering system to provide service to them. And so it's a great project for us to add some capital, but get a really attractive return to provide that third-party service. We're not looking to become a true gathering company for third parties. It's always kind of a 1 plus 1 equals 3 type approach. If we have the capacity within our system that's not being utilized by Seneca, it's economic for us, and we can reach out to those third parties that are proximate to our systems, we always look to do that. It's really -- again, just think of it as a 1 plus 1 equals 3 type approach.

Timothy Rezvan

Okay. I appreciate that. And then if I could just add one more, maybe this is for David. I know on the separation, it's a lengthy process. The big gating factor seems to be the Form 10 filing. I know that's confidential, but can you give any color on when that might get filed or where you stand in that process? I know you're trying to sort of tie this to a quarter end. So just trying to understand if maybe that's a July 1 or an October 1 kind of event in 2027. Any color there would be helpful.

David Bauer

I'll let -- Tim is sort of driving that process. So I'll let him answer that.

Timothy Silverstein

Yes, Tim. Just overall, we're still not specific to anything other than the second half of calendar 2027 for the actual effective date of the spin. But from a practical standpoint, in the near term, likely before the end of this year, our intent is to get the -- this calendar year, that is, get the Form 10 on file, that first confidential submission. From there, there's a number of back and forths with the SEC on that. So usually it will take a number of months to get that ultimately to a position where we can flip that public and share that with the broader investment community. That's likely in the March, April time frame. But that's sort of what we're working towards.

Some of that's within our control and then some of that's within the SEC's control. The other process that goes in parallel is the private letter ruling process. It's actually probably a little bit longer than the Form 10 ultimately. But I still think where we sit today, everything leaves us on track for something in the second half of next year, if not towards the earlier part of that.

Operator

Your next question comes from Sebastian Almodovar with Raymond James.

Sebastian Cuchi-Almodovar

I guess my first question has to do with your Gen 3 design going back to 2027. How confident are you right now on your spacing assumptions or anything that you might have to do or make any changes to it going next year?

Justin Loweth

Yes. So we have a lot of wells in the ground with our Gen 3 design. So it's a relatively developed approach. What we've been looking at was the increased design of the Gen 4, which was slightly wider interval spacing, but quite a bit more proppant loading. So we think that, frankly, this is something we evaluated. I've spoken about this in the past. We wanted to look at Gen 4, see if we saw the productivity uplift, meaning more near-term and long-term ultimate EUR per foot of well that would justify the incremental cost. And what we saw through our appraisal and testing work is that we get some of that uplift that would justify that cost at times, but we don't get it consistently enough to really justify it overall as the investment.

And we also were experiencing more frac risk, hit risk associated with that larger design. I mean the reality is that the Gen 3 looks good. We've got a really good rock quality in the Lower Utica. It concentrates that frac energy. There's clearly some natural fracturing in the reservoir. And so we think that's a really solid design that will give us solid economics and really good recoveries as we move forward.

Sebastian Cuchi-Almodovar

Great. And just as a quick follow-up, I'm not sure if you can speak to this at a high level already, but how should we think about the appropriate leverage you would be targeting post-separation of both companies?

Timothy Silverstein

Yes. I would just refer you back to what we said in the last call. That will ultimately come out in the Form 10. But given where commodity prices are and continue to move around, that's something that we'll continue to evaluate as we get towards the public flip on the Form 10. But everything that we said a few weeks ago still remains true.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Ryan Vossler for closing remarks.

Ryan Vossler

Thank you. We'd like to thank everyone for taking the time to be with us this morning. A replay of the call will be available on our website later today. Please feel free to reach out if you have any follow-up questions. Otherwise, we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Thank you. Have a great day.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.