tradingkey.logo
搜尋

新濠博亞娛樂 (MLCO) 2026 年第三季法說會:EBITDA 達 2.88 億美元、庫藏股回購與澳門展望

2026年11月4日 21:48
facebooktwitterlinkedin

新濠博亞娛樂公布2026年第三季集團調整後物業EBITDA約為2.88億美元。澳門市場需求短期疲軟,但公司透過調整銷售策略及控管成本,10月表現優於大盤。截至9月30日,總流動性約20億美元。7月至11月期間持續回購ADS。管理層首要任務仍為去槓桿,並預計2027年底前可能恢復發放股利。

該摘要由AI生成

重點摘要

  • 新濠博亞娛樂 (Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited) (NASDAQ: MLCO) 公布 2026 年第三季集團調整後物業 EBITDA 約為 2.88 億美元;扣除貴賓廳勝率(VIP hold)影響調整後則為 2.98 億美元。
  • 澳門新濠天地不利的貴賓廳勝率使物業 EBITDA 減少約 1,400 萬美元;馬尼拉與斯里蘭卡有利的貴賓廳勝率則各貢獻約 200 萬美元。
  • 澳門每日營運費用(含賭場優勢 House Advantage)降至約 320 萬美元,低於公司先前給予的指引。
  • 截至 2026 年 9 月 30 日,總流動性約為 20 億美元,其中包括 8.87 億美元的現金、現金等價物與限制性現金。
  • 新濠博亞在 7 月 1 日至 11 月 3 日期間斥資 1.6 億美元買回約 3,310 萬股 ADS。2026 年迄今累計買回 4,710 萬股 ADS,總金額約 2.36 億美元。
  • 管理層仍將去槓桿化視為自由現金流的首要任務。股利有可能在 2027 年底前恢復發放,但具體時機將部分取決於股票回購的機會。

關鍵財務數據

指標2026 年第三季 / 指引說明
集團調整後物業 EBITDA約 2.88 億美元列報績效
按貴賓廳勝率常態化調整後物業 EBITDA約 2.98 億美元排除貴賓廳勝率影響
澳門新濠天地貴賓廳勝率影響約 -1,400 萬美元不利的貴賓廳勝率
馬尼拉與斯里蘭卡貴賓廳勝率影響各約 200 萬美元有利的貴賓廳勝率
澳門每日營運費用 (OpEx)約 320 萬美元含賭場優勢 (House Advantage);低於先前指引
總流動性約 20 億美元截至 2026 年 9 月 30 日
現金、現金等價物及限制性現金約 8.87 億美元包含於總流動性中
2026 年第四季資本支出約 9,500 萬美元隱含 2026 全年資本支出約 3.75 億美元
2027 年資本支出約 2.75 億美元較先前指引下調

業務與營運績效

澳門市場競爭依然激烈,管理層將近期需求描述為「暫時性疲軟」,而非永久性的結構改變。何猷龍 (Lawrence Ho) 表示,由於中國消費疲軟及其他可能存在的壓力,澳門市場 10 月下滑 10%。然而,新濠博亞在 8 月與 9 月調整銷售團隊及獲客策略後,該月表現仍優於澳門整體市場。

該公司正緊縮客戶再投資(促銷回饋),並引進設立保護機制的新玩家俱樂部以維持利潤率。管理層強調,若需求持續疲軟,公司不打算透過不具經濟效益的促銷開支來爭取市場佔有率。

儘管菲律賓面臨經濟壓力,馬尼拉新濠天地仍貢獻約 3,300 萬美元的調整後物業 EBITDA,與上季大致持平。地中海新濠天地及新濠在賽普勒斯的衛星賭場創下開業以來最高單季 EBITDA。斯里蘭卡則仍處於營運提升階段,公司正持續評估客戶偏好。

重新精簡品牌後的 REM 飯店已全面營運,並新增 150 間客房。管理層預期費用僅會小幅增加,因為員工已重新調配,且其他方面的成本也已合理化。

澳門新濠天地的升級版零售與餐飲區域預計自 2026 年底起陸續開幕。其中大部分計畫在農曆新年前開始營運,施工則將持續至 2027 年夏季。

管理層展望指引

針對 2026 年第四季,管理層提供以下非營運指引:

項目2026 年第四季指引
折舊與攤銷1.4 億美元至 1.45 億美元
企業整體費用2,000 萬美元至 2,500 萬美元
合併淨利息費用1.15 億美元至 1.2 億美元

利息費用指引包含與澳門博彩特許經營權及賽普勒斯博彩牌照相關費用約 600 萬美元,以及與馬尼拉新濠天地相關的融資租賃利息約 500 萬美元。

新濠博亞預計 2026 年第四季資本支出約為 9,500 萬美元,使全年支出達到約 3.75 億美元。管理層預估 2027 年資本支出約為 2.75 億美元,低於先前的指引。

風險與關注焦點

管理層指出澳門多個客群出現疲軟現象,而非僅限於最高價值的賭客。公司將此疲軟主因歸咎於中國整體經濟與消費狀況,同時也提及世界盃及海外稅務問題的可能影響。

市場競爭激烈仍是影響利潤率的主要風險。管理層警告,全行業過度的客戶再投資(促銷回饋)可能會加劇博彩需求疲軟對 EBITDA 的衝擊。

貴賓廳勝率波動也影響了單季業績,特別是在澳門新濠天地。此外,澳門政府引導基金投資的最終會計處理方式仍有待公司審計師審查。

分析師問答集錦

資本配置:管理層表示,整合新濠影滙 (Studio City) 的企業結構並非當前優先事項。去槓桿化仍是主要目標,但若估值維持在目前水準附近,新濠博亞仍打算繼續買回 ADS。在贖回 6 億美元於 2027 年到期、利率為 5.625% 的優先票據後,公司在 2027 年已無到期債務。

債務管理:新濠影滙贖回了 1.65 億美元於 2028 年到期、利率為 6.5% 的優先票據,資金主要來自其高級擔保信貸額度及手頭現金。新濠博亞表示,這筆交易與贖回 2027 年票據皆降低了利息費用。

股利發放時機:管理層表示目標可能在 2027 年底前後重啟發放股利,但具體時間仍不確定,因為股票回購可能會繼續爭奪資金使用優先順序。

澳門投資承諾:何猷龍表示,將澳門政府引導基金投資計入強制性投資要求中,有助於消除是否需要額外舉行活動或其他開支的不確定性。

利潤率保護:管理層著重於謹慎的客戶再投資、銷售團隊調整以及營運成本控制。管理層預期 REM 全面營運會帶來微幅費用增加,但正尋求在其他方面節省成本,以限制淨影響。

法說會完整逐字稿


完整財報電話會議逐字稿

管理層陳述

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in the Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited. [Operator Instructions]

Today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Ms. Jeanny Kim, Senior Vice President, Group Treasurer of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited.

Jeanny Kim

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining us today for our third quarter 2026 earnings call. On the call are Lawrence Ho, Geoff Davis, Evan Winkler and our Property Presidents in Macau, Manila and Cyprus.

Before we get started, please note that today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements made under the safe harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Our actual results could differ from our anticipated results. In addition, we may discuss non-GAAP measures. Definitions and reconciliations of each of these measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the earnings release. Finally, please note that our supplementary earnings slides are posted on our Investor Relations website.

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Mr. Lawrence Ho.

Yau Ho

Thank you, Jeanny, and thank you all for joining us today. We continue to be confident in the long-term prospects of our business in Macau. We're focused on disciplined execution of our strategy to drive strong returns. Our distinctive product portfolio in Macau reflects the best in luxury and innovation. Coupled with the opening of our newly branded hotel REM and the renovation of our retail space at City of Dreams, we believe we're well positioned to capture the demands of our evolving customer base, supporting long-term growth.

We're also proud that Morpheus at City of Dreams has been awarded 3 Michelin Keys, becoming the first hotel in Macau and 1 of only 4 in Greater China to receive this distinction. This recognition underscores our commitment to delivering exceptional hospitality and guest experiences.

We continue to enhance our product offerings through improvements to City of Dreams retail and food and beverage experiences. Work is underway. We expect to unveil completed areas progressively from the end of this year, with a substantial portion coming on stream before Chinese New Year and construction continuing into the summer of 2027. Once complete, City of Dreams will offer the most interactive retail and dining experience in Macau, one that is truly second to none.

The Macau market remains extremely competitive. We have been increasingly disciplined in allocating resources with a sharper focus on customer acquisition and reinvestment and ensuring every dollar invested strengthens returns. Alongside these efforts, our performance has improved, with our business outperforming the broader Macau market in October.

Turning to the operations outside Macau. In the Philippines, despite broader economic pressures, City of Dreams Manila demonstrated resilience, with adjusted property EBITDA remaining steady at approximately $33 million in the third quarter of 2026 compared to the prior quarter. In Cyprus, City of Dreams Mediterranean and our Satellite Casinos continue to show strong growth, recording the highest quarterly EBITDA since the start of operations. In Sri Lanka, we continue to build on our understanding of the market and customer preferences as we ramp up operations.

With that, I turn the call over to Geoff.

Geoffrey Davis

Thank you, Lawrence. Our group-wide adjusted property EBITDA for the third quarter of 2026 was approximately $288 million. Adjusted for VIP hold, our adjusted property EBITDA was approximately $298 million. Unfavorable VIP win rates at City of Dreams Macau negatively impacted property EBITDA by approximately $14 million, partially offset by favorable VIP win rates at City of Dreams Manila and Sri Lanka, which positively impacted property EBITDA by approximately $2 million at each property.

Total daily OpEx in Macau declined to approximately $3.2 million during the third quarter of 2026, inclusive of House Advantage, and below our prior guidance. While the operating environment remains competitive, we continue to review our operating structure and adjust spending in response to changes in demand and business volumes while maintaining the highest standards of service and product offerings.

Turning to our balance sheet. We continue to maintain a strong liquidity position. As of September 30, 2026, we had total liquidity of approximately $2 billion, including approximately $887 million of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. Melco Resorts, excluding Studio City, the Philippines, Cyprus and Sri Lanka, accounted for approximately $474 million of cash and cash equivalents.

During the quarter, Studio City redeemed $165 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% senior notes due 2028. The redemption was funded principally through a drawdown under Studio City's senior secured credit facility and cash on hand, which reduces interest expense.

In September, Melco Resorts also redeemed $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.625% senior notes due 2027 in full. The redemption was funded through a drawdown under Melco's revolving credit facilities and also resulted in reduced interest expense. We currently do not have any debt maturities in 2027.

From July 1 through November 3, 2026, we repurchased approximately 33.1 million of our ADSs for consideration of approximately $160 million. This brings total repurchases in 2026 to approximately 47.1 million ADSs for aggregate consideration of approximately $236 million.

As we normally do, we'll give you some guidance on non-operating line items for the upcoming fourth quarter of 2026. Total depreciation and amortization expense is expected to be approximately $140 million to $145 million. Corporate expense is expected to come in at approximately $20 million to $25 million and consolidated net interest expense is expected to be approximately $115 million to $120 million. This includes finance liability interest of approximately $6 million relating to fees payable in relation to the Macau gaming concession and the Cyprus gaming license and finance lease interest of approximately $5 million relating to City of Dreams Manila.

That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, back to you for the Q&A.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from David Bain with Texas Capital Bank.

分析師問答

David Bain

Great. I guess, first, during the quarter, we saw, I would call it, notable volatility in share price dislocation with MSC and recognizing liquidity makes it difficult to be opportunistic, I guess, in the open market, it kind of reopened the debate, I think, around potential consolidation.

Just given your focus on deleveraging and maybe even the upcoming dividend this year, does consolidating MSC corporate structure, does that rank somewhere within the priority list? Or just any kind of color around what kind of conditions could things evolve that direction?

Yau Ho

David, it's Lawrence. Maybe I'll start and Geoff can supplement. I think our corporate priority, as we've stated for the last 2 or 3 years, has been to delever. But recognizing there is a massive dislocation of share prices versus what we believe the fair market value of Melco Resorts is, as Geoff said in his prepared remarks, that we have bought back a lot of shares at Melco. So any sort of Studio City consolidation, that is not a priority at all. But at the same time, we're always open to look at what is the optimum structure.

David Bain

Got it. That makes sense. Okay. And then can we also get your take on the recent Macau government guidance fund? Just given the reinvestment or the investment counts towards the mandatory quotas, does that alleviate maybe uncertainty in terms of non-gaming physical expansion disruption? Is this a better result for you in your requirement? And does it even more broadly have any theoretical impact on 2032 renewals either from a goodwill perspective or structurally?

Yau Ho

Well, I think we think so. We're always happy to support the government in their initiatives. And I think the most important thing for Melco and our fellow competitors in the industry is that this counts towards the stated investment. And so I think if anything, it does remove some of the uncertainties of having to do more events or other things. So all in all, I think it's a good outcome.

Geoffrey Davis

And David, if there was an accounting question in there, there is going to be a difference in how we treat it at MIDL with IFRS versus U.S. GAAP for MLCO. So for MIDL, the accounting will record the investment as an asset, likely an intangible asset, but we're still finalizing that with our auditors. And similarly, at Melco, we're still working with our auditors on the final treatment there. But we do anticipate accounting for it as an asset downstairs as well.

Operator

Your next question comes from Praveen Choudhary with Morgan Stanley.

Praveen Choudhary

Congrats on steady business and grand opening of REM Hotel. I have 2 questions. The first one is financial. Could you tell us if you have a deleveraging target either over the next 12 months or over a medium period? But also do you have a dividend reinstatement target? That's the first question.

The second question is just asking about the current demand environment, especially if you can talk about second half of October, November. There has been some slowdown in the premium segment and then how are you looking at it right now?

Yau Ho

Praveen, maybe I'll take the second question first and let Geoff answer the first one, and Evan can supplement it. But I think we're -- the market is challenging right now. And I think everybody saw that October was down 10%. And let's not forget last year, last October, October 2025, I mean, we had typhoons and then I think Mid-Autumn Festival was stuck in there. So it was already kind of a low base.

So it is -- I think on other calls, we've also listened. I don't think there's one factor. I think the main thing is really the consumption part of the Chinese economy tends to be a bit weak right now. And there could be aftereffects of the World Cup, the overseas tax issues. So I think it's a little bit of a perfect storm.

But I don't think it affects our long-term thesis of the durability of this market. But I think at the same time, we were happy to see that we made some changes over August and September, and those are starting to play out for us in October. But I think maybe Evan can talk about it more.

Evan Winkler

Yes. No, I think, Praveen, as you talk about the market, I think we saw similar to what others have seen, which is there is some softness going into October. I don't think it was only at the high end, although people talk about sort of different points on what the high end is, but we did see some softness going in.

I think, as Lawrence alluded to, our relative positioning because we've been going through some changes in our sales force and other things in the August, September time frame bore some fruit. So we did a little bit better in October from a company standpoint. But from an overall market standpoint, I think as Lawrence said, we've hit a little bit of a soft pocket.

I think some of that is just the general overall China economy coming through. I'm not sure that I would point, and I know others have, acutely only to the high end. It's not just in the sort of top, top players that we're seeing. We are seeing some general softness as you go down, which makes us sort of feel like it's probably a little bit more overall China economy than just the specific tax one that's sort of getting the headlines. But as Lawrence said, I think as we look forward, I don't think we view it as a permanent structural change. I think we view it more as a soft pocket and we're working through it.

Geoffrey Davis

And Praveen, on your first question, as Lawrence said, deleveraging is our #1 priority with our free cash flow. We don't have a specific target to share, but we'd like to be a lot closer to where we were in 2019 versus where we are today.

And on the dividend, perhaps to echo what we said on the second quarter call, we would still aim to recommence the dividend potentially towards the end of next year, but that will be very hard to predict the exact timing given that we will have potentially other opportunities to continue to buy back stock.

We have prioritized buying back stock at these very dislocated levels of valuation. And you can expect us to continue to buy stock if the shares stay at or around these levels. So dividend is still something we would endeavor to do on the horizon, but timing is difficult to pinpoint.

Praveen Choudhary

Those are very clear. Can I have a follow-up question? I wanted to ask about the competitive intensity. First of all, the OpEx number looks good. So clearly, everyone, but also you, are working on your OpEx. But the issue is that now our GGR numbers for the market have turned negative.

When revenue was great, our cost was also up for the industry. And now that GGR is negative, even though we are working on OpEx and reinvestment, I'm worried that EBITDA growth is not visible. I just wanted to understand from your perspective sitting there, what could you do to ensure that your EBITDA is not falling or you can maintain it at this level? What else can you do?

Evan Winkler

Why don't I lead off and Lawrence and Geoff may also comment. Again, I think from where we are as a market and what we're focused on very much so is that as you go into a period of lower demand that you're not trying to chase to unhealthy levels in reinvestment to get the business that's there.

So we actually, as we speak, are launching our new player club tomorrow morning. So we've gone back over the last sort of couple of months in the wake of some changes that we've made in our sales force to make sure that we're taking an appropriate and disciplined approach to how we're looking at reinvestment relative to player performance sort of across the board and trying to make sure that we're putting in guardrails and everything else to make sure that we maintain margins moving forward.

So I think the approach that we're taking and we're sort of signaling to the market is we think the right thing to be doing here is to continue to be disciplined in what we're doing going forward because it's very easy to chase everybody down to the bottom, especially if you're in a market where people feel like they need to grab a little bit of share because revenue is soft.

I think we feel good about where we are and what we're doing, but the market is going to continue to be dynamic. And the market right now continues to be competitive. So what I would tell you is we, with Lawrence's direction, put in place programs that we think are customer-attractive but preserve margin. And we're going to have to see how that plays out over the next month or 2 because obviously, we're going to react to what others do.

But the hope is that others will sort of follow the lead and take a rational approach because, again, as demand softens, you don't want to double the impact by having a circumstance where everyone is throwing money at getting the remaining share and driving down margin disproportionately. So I'd say we're a leader in rationality, but whether or not everyone decides to follow suit or to check themselves into the asylum, we will see over the next month or so.

Operator

Your next question comes from Timothy Chau with Citigroup.

Tak-Hei Chau

I think I was on mute just now. I actually have 2 questions here. The first one is about REM. If I remember correctly, from last quarter's guidance, I think the opening of REM should not have a significant impact on the costing of the overall group. I'm just wondering if this guidance still stands, seeing REM is currently operating normally now.

The second question is about the CapEx guidance. I'm just wondering if there's any change or any color on how we should be looking at the CapEx guidance -- sorry, CapEx by the end of this year and also next year.

Evan Winkler

Sure. So this is Evan. Maybe I'll take REM and then Geoff will do CapEx. I think the guidance that we gave you in the last call is correct in the sense that Tim and the team at COD have worked very hard to try and move bodies around not to increase incremental costs in terms of opening up the additional room count.

We are going to see a tick-up in expenses overall just because it still is an incremental 150 keys, but we're trying to find other places where we can rationalize expense. So I would say it's not a dramatic move up, but there will be a tick-up now that we've got REM fully operational.

Geoffrey Davis

And on the second question on CapEx. So we've been able to bring down CapEx for the remainder of 2026 and for 2027 as compared to prior guidance. So for the fourth quarter of this year, we're looking at about $95 million of CapEx, bringing the total to roughly $375 million. And then for next year, we're looking for total CapEx of around $275 million.

Operator

There are no further phone questions at this time. I'll now hand back to Jeanny Kim for closing remarks.

Jeanny Kim

Thank you for participating in the conference call today, and we look forward to speaking to you again next quarter. Thank you.

Operator

That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

本文部分內容由 AI 生成和翻譯,並經人工審核,僅供參考且做為一般資訊用途,不構成投資建議。

免責聲明:本網站提供的資訊僅供教育和參考之用,不應視為財務或投資建議。

推薦文章

tradingkey.logo
風險提示:我們的網站和行動應用程式僅提供關於某些投資產品的一般資訊。Finsights 不提供財務建議或對任何投資產品的推薦,且提供此類資訊不應被解釋為 Finsights 提供財務建議或推薦。
投資產品存在重大投資風險,包括可能損失投資的本金,且可能並不適合所有人。投資產品的過去表現並不代表其未來表現。
Finsights 可能允許第三方廣告商或關聯公司在我們的網站或行動應用程式的任何部分放置或投放廣告,並可能根據您與廣告的互動情況獲得報酬。
© 版權所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版權所有