赫克拉礦業 (HL) 2026 年第三季法說會：現金流創新高與更強勁的財測指引

重點摘要

• Hecla Mining 在 2026 年第三季創下 2.03 億美元的季度營運現金流新高，以及 1.51 億美元的自由現金流新高。
• 持續營運淨利從第二季的 1.18 億美元（每股 0.18 美元）增至 1.5 億美元（每股 0.22 美元）。持續營運之調整後 EBITDA 季增 6%，年增超過 40%，達到 2.11 億美元。
• Hecla 生產了 420 萬盎司白銀。Greens Creek 貢獻了超過 190 萬盎司，Lucky Friday 近 130 萬盎司，Keno Hill 則創下 96.3 萬盎司的新高紀錄。
• 該公司在本季結束時擁有 6.92 億美元現金、約 6.8 億美元淨現金，且除了融資租賃外無長期債務。總流動資金約為 12 億美元。
• Hecla 改善了 2026 年白銀成本指引、調升合併白銀產量指引下限，並減少了計畫的資本投資。
• 在 Keno Hill、Midas 潛在重啟以及 Greens Creek 有機專案的支援下，管理層維持每年生產超過 2,000 萬盎司白銀的中期目標。

關鍵財務數據

第三季營收受益於 Greens Creek 精礦出貨時間點從上一季遞延至 8 月初。淨利還包含 3,600 萬美元的公允價值調整增加，主要來自有價證券的已實現與未實現利益。這些效益部分被較高的銷售成本、稅金以及探勘與預開發支出所抵銷。

業務與營運表現

Greens Creek

Greens Creek 生產了超過 190 萬盎司白銀與近 12,000 盎司黃金。產量較上一季下滑，主因是計畫性的選礦廠維護。

該礦場產生了 1.55 億美元的營運現金流，以及創該礦場紀錄的 1.47 億美元自由現金流。扣除副產品計入後，每盎司白銀的現金成本為負 0.11 美元，總維持成本（AISC）為負 3.25 美元。

Hecla 正推進黃鐵礦精礦迴路工程，旨在回收目前進入乾堆尾礦中的白銀與黃金。在平均儲量品位下，管理層預估在全面投產後，每年可新增 100 萬至 120 萬盎司白銀以及 10,000 至 15,000 盎司黃金的產量。使用臨時設備的間歇性生產最快可能在 2027 年底開始，並可能在 2028 年底達到滿負載產能，具體取決於工程、許可與最終批准。

截至 9 月 30 日，乾堆尾礦設施估計包含 1,070 萬噸物料，含有約 5,100 萬盎司白銀與近 60 萬盎司黃金。該公司正在評估三條潛在途徑：第三方加工、直接銷售給冶煉廠或精礦交易商，以及現場加工。預計將於第四季裝載並運送約 5,500 乾公噸的測試樣品。

Lucky Friday

Lucky Friday 生產了近 130 萬盎司白銀，而第二季創紀錄產量為 150 萬盎司。季減主因是高品位礦包的消耗。

扣除副產品計入後，現金成本為每盎司 7.31 美元，總維持成本為每盎司 27.68 美元。該礦場產生了 8,800 萬美元的營運現金流和 6,700 萬美元的自由現金流。

Silver Shaft 專案預計將於 2026 年第四季啟用。管理層表示，這應該能在不久後改善地下作業環境，並支援該礦場 15 年的儲量壽命。

Keno Hill

在白銀品位提升超過 35% 以及季度採礦速率創紀錄的支援下，Keno Hill 產出了創紀錄的 96.3 萬盎司白銀。營運現金流為 500 萬美元，而自由現金流為負 200 萬美元。

Hecla 將降低處理量，以保留獲許可的尾礦、廢石與水處理產能。預計第四季處理量將降至每天約 300 噸，隨後自 2027 年 1 月起進一步減少。

管理層預估白銀產量的下降比例將小於處理量，因為開採和加工將變得更有選擇性。較低品位的物料將被堆存以備日後加工。然而，在許可申請期間，該礦場高額的固定成本基礎意味著較低的營收與更高的每噸成本。

Midas 與探勘

Hecla 繼續評估重啟位於內華達州的 Midas 營運項目。現有基礎設施包括一座每日處理能力約 1,200 噸的選礦廠，以及一座儲存容量約為 15 年的尾礦設施。

第三季探勘與企業發展支出總計 1,660 萬美元。全年指引維持在 5,500 萬美元，不過管理層正在考慮增加 2027 年的探勘預算。

在 Keno Hill，Hecla 有四台鑽機正在運作。鑽探擴展了 Flame & Moth 和 Birmingham Deep 的礦化區域。在 Greens Creek，鑽探在 Northwest West 資源量附近發現了硫化物礦化，而內華達州的鑽探則在 Midas、Aurora 和 Hollister 繼續進行。

管理層指引

• Greens Creek 的 2026 年產量指引維持在 800 萬至 830 萬盎司白銀，以及 5.1 萬至 5.5 萬盎司黃金。
• Greens Creek 的銷售成本指引增加了 1,000 萬美元至 2.5 億美元，反映了前九個月的成果以及第四季預期較高的現場發電成本。
• Greens Creek 的現金成本指引改善至每盎司白銀負 13.00 至負 12.50 美元。扣除副產品計入後，總維持成本指引改善至每盎司負 5.50 至負 5.00 美元。
• Lucky Friday 的全年白銀產量指引透過調升下限至 520 萬盎司而收窄。銷售成本指引維持在 1.4 億美元。
• Lucky Friday 的現金成本指引改善至每盎司 8.50 至 9.00 美元。扣除副產品計入後，總維持成本指引收窄至每盎司 24.50 至 25.50 美元。
• 管理層繼續以中期每年生產超過 2,000 萬盎司白銀為目標。預計 Keno Hill 的主要營運限制將在 2029 年中至年末減輕，屆時處理量有可能恢復至每天 440 噸。

風險與關注事項

Keno Hill 獲許可的尾礦容量是主要的固定限制，剩餘容量約為 20 萬噸。廢石儲存與水處理能力帶來了額外的不確定性。許可或基礎設施的延誤、對臨時廢料堆存的限制、可用電力減少或白銀價格大幅下跌，都可能導致進一步減產或進入維護保養狀態。

Greens Creek 的黃鐵礦和尾礦專案仍取決於工程結果、冶金測試、許可、第三方加工可行性以及最終投資批准。管理層亦提醒，標明的尾礦 64 億美元毛原位金屬價值不包含龐大的運輸、加工和銷售成本，且並非礦產資源量或儲量估算。

勞動成本約佔 Hecla 總成本的 50%。管理層表示，目前的勞動力競爭尚未對成本結構產生重大影響，但仍需持續關注。

分析師問答重點

資本配置：管理層當前的首要任務是保留足夠的流動資金，以資助有機成長、探勘以及在商品價格低迷時期的韌性。然而，執行長 Robert Krcmarov 表示，董事會可能會在 2027 年上半年進行更具實質性的資本回報討論。潛在選項包括發放股利或庫藏股買回，而與白銀價格掛鉤的股利被認為可能性不大。

併購標準：Hecla 打算維持其對白銀和相對安全管轄區的專注。管理層表示，在經過詳細風險評估的前提下，可能會考慮位於弗雷澤研究所（Fraser Institute）指數前三分之一的國家。有機成長仍是主要策略，但若有符合其投資標準且具吸引力的收購目標，該公司也會予以考慮。

Keno Hill 前景：管理層偏好保留員工並在現有許可範圍內繼續營運，而不是立即轉入維護保養狀態。該公司預期降低處理量的時期將持續約三年，對其中期年產量超過 2,000 萬盎司的目標保持不變。

Keno Hill 探勘：管理層表示，鑑於預估約 15 年的儲量壽命，該礦場目前不需要額外增加礦量。相反地，近礦採區的鑽探重點放在可從現有開發管道獲取的高品位物料，而營運工作的目標是降低貧化率並提高入選選礦廠的礦石品質。

Greens Creek 尾礦策略：管理層表示，三條加工途徑提供了靈活性，並可結合使用。管理層不認為潛在的現場加工超出 Hecla 的專業範圍，因為該技術將類似於目前針對入選礦石所開發的黃鐵礦精礦迴路。

完整財報電話會議紀錄

---

完整財報電話會議逐字稿

管理層陳述

Operator

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Q3 2026 Hecla Mining Company Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Mike Parkin, Vice President of Strategy and Investor Relations. Mike, please go ahead.

Michael Parkin

Thank you, Hillary. Good morning, and thank you for all for joining us for Hecla's Third Quarter 2026 Results Conference Call. I'm Mike Parkin, Vice President of Strategy and Investor Relations. Our earnings release that was issued yesterday along with today's presentation are available on our website.

On the call with us today is Rob Krcmarov, President and Chief Executive Officer; Russell Lawlar, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Carlos Aguiar, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; [ Brian Erickson ], Vice President of Operations; Kurt Allen, Vice President, Exploration; as well as other members of our management team. At the conclusion of our prepared remarks, we will be available to answer your questions.

Now turning over to Slide 2, cautionary statements. Any forward-looking statements made today by the management team come under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and involve risks as shown on this slide in our earnings release and in our 10-Q filing with the SEC. These and other risks could cause results to differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

Non-GAAP measures are cited on this call and related slides are reconciled in these slides or in the back of the news release. Please note, as we discuss financial figures and projections throughout this presentation and in the earnings release, we are referring to our continuing operations.

I will now pass the call over to Rob.

Robert Krcmarov

Thank you, Mike, and good morning, everyone. Turning to Slide 3. Hecla in the third quarter of 2026 is from a position of real strength. And I'm speaking of financial strength, a position today that marks the strongest balance sheet in the company's very long history. And so the attributes shown on this slide that define us as North America's premium silver producer, they haven't changed. What has changed is the confidence with which we can now invest in what comes next.

So I'm going to have our team discuss some really remarkable developments that are coming out of our substantial project pipeline further solidifies our market positioning. And so a little bit more on that in a minute.

So turning to Slide 4. This was another very strong quarter for Hecla, even though a couple of the headline numbers moved in a different direction than last quarter. I want to spend a moment walking through why because I think the underlying story here is a very good one.

Revenue from continuing operations was $334 million compared to the record $411 million we reported in the first quarter. Two things are driving that change. And it's worth being clear about both because neither of them is a production problem.

First, metal prices pulled back from the highs we saw early in the year. So I remain very confident in the outlook for silver and gold prices.

Second, part of the gap was simply timing. A meaningful amount of silver constraint, mostly at Greens Creek was produced but not yet sold as of quarter end. Had that concentrate shift with the quarter, revenue would have been noticeably higher on top of an already strong quarter. So that inventory shipped in early August, and you'll see it sharp in our third quarter results. Those of you who followed us for some time know the lumpy sales pattern at Greens Creek.

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $199 million, more than double the $94 million we generated a year ago. Operating cash flow was -- sorry -- to continue. Just going to reemphasize, I've got some numbers mixed up from the previous quarter, and I apologize everyone. Income from continuing operations was $160 million or $0.22 a share, up from $118 million or $0.18 a share in the second quarter. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations was $211 million. That's up 6% over the quarter and up more than 40% on a year ago.

Operating cash flow from continuing operations was a record $203 million. Free cash flow was recut at $151 million, which is nearly true to what we generated in the third quarter last year. And Greens Creek led the way with a site record of $147 million.

The balance sheet is the strongest it's ever been. We finished the quarter with almost $700 million in cash and no long-term debt up from finance leases. We've also put in place a new $500 million revolving credit facility it's undrawn other than a small amount of letters of credit, and it comes with a $100 million [indiscernible] option. So if you add it all up, we have about $1.2 billion of liquidity, and that gives us real options, the flexibility to keep investing in the projects and the assets that make the most sense on our own time line rather than being dictated to by the silver price as in the past.

On the operating side, we produced 4.2 million ounces of silver within 1% in the second quarter. Greens Creek produced over 1.9 million ounces on Friday produced nearly 1.3 million ounces which is what we planned after coming out of the high-grade pocket that drove second quarter, that record in the second quarter.

In Keno Hill contributed almost 1 million ounces, and that shows what this asset can do, and that's why we keep investing and derisking its future. So wait on Keno Hill, that record came from running the mill close to its permanent limit. And our current permits can't support that for long. So we're choosing to suppress throughput to stay within permit limits. And Carlos will give you the numbers and the timing on that in a minute.

Civil production should fall by less than throughput, and that's because we'll be more selective in both the mine and the mill. I want to be clear, Keno Hill carries a high fixed cost base. So through the permitting period at current prices, you should expect lower revenue and higher cost per tonne. That said, I still see real value in that ground, and that's why we have four drills turning there.

We also made some positive changes to our 2026 guidance. We raised the bottom end of our consolidated silver production range. We improved our silver cash cost and all-in sustaining cost guidance, and we lowered our capital investment guidance.

Turning to Slide 5. This slide shows where we want to take company. Our medium-term goal is to be a silver producer of more than 20 million ounces a year. A potential restart at Midas is part of that, and so is Keno Hill getting to its permanent mill rate. once the permitting and infrastructure work is done. All of it depends on exploration success, development and permitting.

Closer in, we have two organic opportunities at Greens Creek. One is the pyrite concentrate circuit we told you about last quarter, and the other is the dry stack turnings, which now has more than one potential path forward.

Of the three projects on the next slide have in common is low capital intensity. Our path for any of these investments is a return that clears our investment thresholds by a healthy margin and early indications on the pyrite circuit are encouraging on that front.

I am constructive on silver and gold, even so, I'd rather build cash now so we can keep these projects moving whatever the price does. And that's why the balance sheet has been such a priority for us.

I'll turn it over to Brian to walk through the latest progress on [indiscernible]. Brian, over to you.

Brian Erickson

Thanks, Rob. Turning to Slide 6. So work continues to advance on all three organic projects Rob discussed and as shown on this slide, and they share one important attribute, each is expected to be low in capital spend. These projects build on infrastructure we already have. They follow permitting paths that are already established and well understood, and we already have the operating expertise in-house. That allows us to produce potentially high-margin production and cash flow growth while reducing many of the exploration and development risks on [ Hariton ] greenfield projects.

Starting with the Greens Creek pyrite concentrate circuit. We're advancing engineering on a new circuit at the mill that will recover additional silver and gold, the current reports to the dry stack tailings facility, producing a marketable pyrite concentrate that is shown to be in high demand. This work is at a scoping level, incorporating some advanced design and preliminary cost estimates are underway.

At average reserve grades, we continue to estimate that the circuit could add potentially 1 million to 1.2 million ounces of silver and 10,000 to 15,000 ounces of gold in annual production once fully ramped up on top of things because existing output. Early indications continue to point to a robust return on capital that meets our investment thresholds while also reducing the rate at which we add tailings to the storage facility, which would be expected to lower future tailings storage capacity related investment.

With a favorable benefit to cost ratio and what we believe is low technical risk. This project is well suited to an accelerated engineering and execution path subject to permits and final investment approval.

Under that path, we expect to begin intermittent pyrite production of concentrate as early as late '27 using temporary equipment. With potential to reach full capacity with the completion of the new circuit expected in late 2028. These estimates remain preliminary and are subject to changes in engineering advances, but we're very excited about this project.

Second is the Greens Creek [ Tails ] reprocessing project. Now looking at the middle age on the slide. I want to spend a little extra time because the scope of what we're evaluating has broadened. As of September 30, the dry stack tailings facility held an estimated 10.7 million tons of material containing roughly 51 million ounces of silver, nearly 600,000 ounces of gold in additional critical minerals.

At quarter end metals prices, that represents in its situ gross metal value of approximately $6.4 billion. That's a gross figure before transportation processing and sales [indiscernible], which we expect to be significant and it is not amend our resource to reserve. So think of it as at a measured scale. We're evaluating the potential of three pathways forward with this.

First pathway is the one we've been working on for a few years, a multiphase metallurgical program with a third party. Phase 3 testing was completed in August and the metallurgical results are pending and expected any week now. That's a key milestone that should help shape our next steps, including the potential to advance to a pilot plan tested in Phase 4. This pathway depends on our potential partners securing a suitable processing facility, which they are working on.

Early indications point to a potentially low capital intensity path for equity to achieve initial cash flows with first cash flows potentially in about 3 years based on our current understanding today. So that timing is subject to a number of factors, largely outside of our control and could change.

What is new this quarter is that we are now evaluating two additional pathways. One of the new potential pathways is a direct sale of the dry stack material. Following interest from third-party smelters and concentrate dealers, we're evaluating whether this material could qualify as low-grade feedstock that we can sell directly. And this is moving from concept to action.

In the fourth quarter, we expect to load a test parcel from Greens Creek of approximately 5,500 dry metric tons of this low-grade feedstock for shipment and sale to a third-party smelter. This remains early stage, and there's no assurance that lead the commercial shipments next year and beyond, but it is an important first step, and we'll look to update the market as we learn more.

The third pathway self-processing, this would potentially involve an on-site processing facility, which could require new or amended permits. We expect to begin metallurgical evaluation of the self-processing concept in the first quarter of 2027 and to initial results potentially available by spring of '27 to help determine next steps.

These pathways for the Greens Creek tailings are not mutually exclusive. Our path forward could include more than one of them and we're evaluating combinations of two or more. That flexibility is real strength because it gives us multiple ways to capture value and generate cash flows from material we already have on site.

And as with pyrite concentrate, reprocessing all or part of the tailings could reduce the space needed for tailings storage and help lower Greens Creek's long-term reclamation liability. We expect to provide further details in coming quarters as the evaluation work advances.

Finally, the Midas Restart Project in Nevada also continues to advance and it shares that same low capital intensity attribute. Midas has permitted infrastructure, including a mill with approximately 1,200 tonnes per day of milling capacity, a tailings facility with roughly 15 years of storage capacity and other surface infrastructure. All of which could help reduce the time and capital required for a restart.

We're working to expand the existing high-grade gold and silver resource to the scale needed to support a restart, and we continue to evaluate a hub and spoke bottle that we bring ore from Midas and potentially other regional sources such as Hollister, which is well within trucking distance through the existing mill.

Drilling resumed at Hollister this quarter after a multiyear pause, and Kurt will touch on the latest Nevada exploration results in a few minutes.

In summary, three capital projects at three different stages with one common thread. Low capital intensity and the potential for high margins. We'll keep you updated as the work advances. I'll now turn the call over to Carlos for the operations review.

Carlos Aguiar

Thank you, Brian. Turning to Slide 8. Greens Creek produced 1.9 million ounces of silver and nearly 12,000 ounces of gold in the third quarter, lower than the second quarter, primarily due to higher term plant maintenance during the quarter. Cost applicable to sales were $76 million, reflecting the higher sales volume from the timing of shipments noted by Rob earlier. Free cash costs of negative $0.11 per ounce in AISC of negative $3.25 per ounce, but after by-product credits.

Cash flow from operations was $155 million free cash flow was a new side level quarterly record of $147 million. As Rob mentioned, the concentrate inventory we carried at the end of the second quarter, cheaper in early August and is reflected in these results.

Looking ahead, we have additional stable maintenance planning in the fourth quarter. We remain confident in achieving production guidance at our flagship operation, which is -- which we are maintaining a 8 million to 8.3 million ounces of silver and 51,000 to 55,000 ounces of gold.

We are raising our cost applicable to sales guidance by $10 million to $250 million, reflecting actual results over the first 9 months and higher expected on-site power generation cost in the fourth quarter. this increase in total dollars. On a per ounce basis, guidance has improved, driven by our strong first 9 months in [indiscernible] product credits. We now expect cash costs of negative $13 to nearly $12.50 per ounce, an [indiscernible] of negative $5.50 to negative $5 per ounce, both after byproduct credits.

Turning to Slide 9. Lucky Friday produced nearly 1.3 million ounces of silver as planned, but the mined-out of the high-grade ore pocket that drove record second quarter production of 1.5 million ounces. Cost applicable to sales were $34 million. Cash costs were $7.31 per ounce and [indiscernible] $27.68 per ounce, both after by product credits. But were up from the second quarter, reflecting lower production volume and higher sustaining capital spending. Cash flow from operations was $88 million and free cash flow was $67 million.

The [ Silver Valley ] project is expected to be commissioned in the fourth quarter of 2026. We expect it to begin improving underground working conditions shortly after commissioning. Supporting the mine's 15-year reserve mine life.

For the full year, we have tightened our super production guidance by raising the low end of the range to 5.2 million ounces be cost applicable to sales with no change at $140 million. We have also improved our cost guidance. We now expect cash costs of $8.50 to $9 per ounce, down from 9% to 9.75%, and we have lowered the high end of our 86 range to $25.50 per ounce from $26. For a new range of $24.50 to $25.50 per ounce, both opted by product credit.

Turning to Slide 10. At Keno Hill produced a record 963,000 ounces of silver in the third quarter. we soon benefited from a new silver grade that improved more than 35%, and we work through the lower grade zone we discussed earlier this year and from a new quarterly record mining rate.

Cash flow from operations was $5 million and free cash flow was negative $2 million, reflecting continued capital investment in working capital outflows. However, you shouldn't expect that mining great to repeat. In September, the meal range loss to its permitting grade, but the capacity under our [ coring ] waste rock, tailings and water permits at support that rate over time. Beginning in the fourth quarter, we are choosing to suppress [indiscernible] to present that capacity and stay within permitting limits. We expect [ Troca ] to step down to approximately 300 tonnes per day in the fourth quarter with further suppression beginning in January 2027 to a level significantly below third quarter 2026.

As Rob noted, we expect silver production to decline proportionally less and top as we mine and process more selectively. In practical terms, at [indiscernible] prices, you should expect lower revenue and higher cost per ton at Keno Hill this period. given the high fixed cost nature of the asset. We have been speaking to this strategy for a few quarters now, or we believe is the best path forward.

While we wait on permits, the team is focused on what we can control. We are putting in place tighter great control to reduce dilution and that work is underway. We are also planning to be more selective about what was to the mill, and we are preparing to stockpile lower grain materials so we can process it later once we have the permitted capacity.

As these steps come together, we expect hydro grade and better margin on every ton we process while keeping the lower grade tons of able for later. The permitting and infrastructure work we are doing now is what should allow the mine to reach its potential.

I will not turn the call over to Russel for the finance outlook.

Russell Lawlar

Thank you, Carlos. Turning to Slide 12, let me take you through our financial results. As Mike noted, everything I'll cover here reflects results from our continuing operations.

Hecla provides an investment opportunity like no other. Not only are our mines in the best jurisdictions and we have very -- a very low cost profile in long mine lives. We also offer exposure to silver that is best in class with 69% of our third quarter revenues coming from silver, with gold making up 15% and the remaining coming from base metals.

Revenues during the quarter inclusive of environmental services were $395 million. with $372 million coming from our mining operations, which is up 17% from last quarter. The increase is primarily due to timing of shipments at Greens Creek, as we've already discussed.

With these revenues, we remain the purest silver mid-cap multi-asset producer. And as we've already discussed, our project pipeline is pointing to growing our exposure to silver for our shareholders.

As we move to Slide 13, I'll go into further details on the financial performance during the quarter. Income from continuing operations was $150 million or $0.22 per share compared with $118 million or $0.18 per share last quarter. In addition to the higher revenue, income benefited from a $36 million increase in fair value adjustments primarily related to realized and unrealized gains on marketable securities. That was partly offset by $41 million of higher cost applicable to sales on the higher volumes sold, $22 million of higher tax expense on better profitability and a $6 million increase in exploration and predevelopment expenses programs ramped up, including new programs at Hollister and [ Aurora ].

Our margins remained strong. We realized $63.62 per ounce of silver sold and with an AISC of $14.34 per ounce, that drove a margin of $4.28 per ounce or 77% of the realized price of silver. AISC was higher than the second quarter, mainly because of lower production at Greens Creek and Lucky Friday, lower byproduct credits, primarily related to less gold production and higher sustaining capital, mostly at Lucky Friday. These non-GAAP figures of AISC and cash costs exclude Keno Hill, which remain in a state of pre-commercial production.

As we presented last quarter, we have substantially less exposure to oil than many of our peers in the industry. The starting point is the nature of our ore bodies at our operations. which are high grade and high-value underground mines where we mine less tons to extract the value. And as a result, we consume less diesel.

The second factor is all of our operations source their power from local utilities where diesel prices do not impact the price. From time to time, Greens Creek will generate power. However, this isn't normally for prolonged periods of time and doesn't move the cost structure materially when we do.

Cash provided by operating activities was a record $203 million, up 16% from the prior quarter, helped by favorable working capital changes and higher payable ounces sold. Consolidated free cash flow was a record $151 million, surpassing the previous record of $144 million set in the first quarter. At the site level, before exploration and corporate costs, Greens Creek generated a record $147 million in Lucky Friday generated $67 million, while Keno Hill was slightly negative due to working capital movements weighing on cash flow. This is primarily related to the collection of payment from two shipments of concentrate that slipped to October.

Turning to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with $692 million in cash, up from $483 million at the end of the second quarter, that increase reflects our strong cash flow generation as well as $64 million of proceeds from the [ sale ] of investments. We have no long-term debt outside of finance leases, and we entered into a new $500 million revolving credit facility undrawn other than $3.4 million of letters of credit, plus a $100 million accordion option together with our cash, that brings our total liquidity to approximately $1.2 billion.

We've moved from a net debt position of approximately $144 million a year ago to a net cash position of approximately $680 million today, which gives us the strongest balance sheet we've had in Hecla's history.

I'll now turn the call to Kurt to go through exploration.

Kurt Allen

Thank you, Russell. We invested $16.6 million in exploration and corporate development this quarter. The 2026 guidance remains at $55 million with the success we've had this year, we're looking to grow our budget next year.

Turning to Slide 15. I'll start at Keno Hill where drilling ramped up through the quarter. We now have four drills turning, and we expect [ Gulf 4 ] to run through the end of the year. that's already paying off at the flame and month. We're drilling in the favorable basal court site along strike with the Lightning vein has identified a new mineralized extension with over 350 feet at dip length located 900 feet southwest of the existing resource.

Three or four holes encountered significant mineralization. [ K24, K26, 944 ] returned 26.1 ounce per ton silver and 14% in zinc, over 8.5 feet. [ Ball K26, 951 ] returned 6.5 ounce per ton silver and 3.5% zinc over 16.1 feet. This new extension is open to the northeast towards the existing resource into the Southwest along strike, and we will continue follow-up drilling in the fourth quarter.

Turning to Slide 16. At Birmingham Deep, we continue to extend the high-grade trend that points toward the historic [ Hectorcalume ] mine, which produced roughly 96 million ounces of silver historically. Southwest step out hole [ K26, 940 ] returned 25.7 ounce per ton silver and 4.2% led over 10 feet on the football vein and whole [ K26, 942 ] stepped out a further 165 feet and a strongly mineralized rock with assays pending.

Together with whole 945 to the Northeast, the known strike length of this trend is now 1,300 feet, a 500-foot increase over the second quarter.

On the Birmingham Main Vein 2, whole 940 also intersected 61.1 ounce per ton silver and 3.8% bled over 5.3 feet, extending that vein about 260 feet to the Southwest.

Turning to Slide 17 and moving to Greens Creek at the West or offset target, about 500 feet from the Northwest West resource, three of five holes intersected significant sulfide mineralization. Holes PS 511, 512 and 513 encountered 6, 11 and 8.3 feet, respectively, defining sulfide mineralization over 300 feet of strike with assays pending. These results support the concept that this area could post a meaningful extension to the existing mineralized at Greens Creek.

At Greens Creek, all four holes this year intersected the target horizon with strong alteration and abundant pyrite, including 90 to semi-massive pyrite in whole [ PS 509]. In the underground, three rigs continue to define and step out from existing resources with good results, including 63.6 ounce per tonne silver over 14.1 feet in the 200 South zone.

Turning to Slide 18. In Nevada, at minus hold DMC 494 returned 0.73 ounce per tonne gold and 2.9 ounces per tonne silver over 1.4 feet. Confirming a second narrow high-grade vein following our second quarter discovery and hold DMC 481. Step-out holes on both veins, all intersected the structure with assays pending on all but one. These results confirm the prospectivity of the Southwest Pediment area, an important part of our evaluation of a potential restart of Midas.

Drilling also began at Aurora, where [ Braley ] Peak showed intense alteration and at Polaris where it showed banded courts veins with evidence of boiling, suggesting we need to drill test deeper on these targets. At Hollister, drilling began at the South and [ Excalibur ] targets with assays pending, drilling at both Aurora and Hollister will continue in the fourth quarter.

I'll now turn the call back to Rob for closing remarks.

Robert Krcmarov

Thank you, Kurt. Turning to Slide 19 and to start, safety improved again, but we're continuing to work to improve it further. Our total reportable injury frequency rate, or TRIFR, improved again from 1.51% to 1.57% in the quarter, and that's the right direction. I think we can still better because as always said, a safe mine is a productive mine.

Q3 was a quarter of record cash flow and continued strong financial results. It builds on a record that has helped us pay down debt and move into a position of real financial strength, the kind that lets us keep investing in our robust organic project pipeline for years to come and serve as value for our shareholders. We have almost $700 million in cash, no long-term debt and about $1.2 billion in liquidity.

Without question, that's the strongest balance sheet in this company's history. And our pipeline continues to advance with the power concentrate circuit progressing at Greens Creek, new potential paths forward for the dry stack tailings and Midas potentially heading towards a restart. And all of these have lower capital intensity as the common thread.

At Keno Hill, we're working through the permits and the infrastructure that will support the mine reaching its potential. We do believe in robust precious metals market, and we think silver has a very bright future, and we're working to grow the exposure to the metal for our shareholders.

I really hope you can feel the enthusiasm we have inside our company for the project pipeline. We think Hecla is the most compelling way to get exposure to silver in this sector. And perhaps the last word on guidance. We've tightened our production range, improved our silver cash costs and all-in sustaining costs and we've lowered our capital investment, all while generating record free cash flow. So with another solid quarter behind us, we're well positioned to achieve our 2026 guidance, and we look forward to keeping you updated.

I will now ask the operator to open the line for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of [ Harrison Reynolds ] from RBC Capital Markets.

分析師問答

Unknown Analyst

Congratulations on the good quarter for Hecla. Looking at the balance sheet now $700 million in cash and credit facility up to $600 million. What are the latest thoughts and the best use of capital from here, including your assessment of the current valuation shares you're trading at between organic investment, returning capital to shareholders and potentially M&A from here? And on M&A, what would your criteria look like between jurisdiction commodity focus stage and size?

Robert Krcmarov

Russell, why don't you start with the balance sheet.

Russell Lawlar

Yes, as it relates to the balance sheet, frankly, and as we've communicated in the past, we're working towards building a cash balance that's capable of providing for our future liquidity needs. Brian talked quite a lot on those growth projects that will require capital. There's -- they're not huge capital intensity, but we also want to make sure we can fund those. Kurt has spoken about the exploration that he's working on, right? So we expect good things to come from that. So we want to make sure we're able to fund that.

Additionally, we want to make sure we have sufficient liquidity just on our balance sheet as it relates to being able to whether blow prices and other things like that. But as we do build that balance sheet as we see focus come in as it relates to these growth projects that Brian spoke about, exploration programs, that kind of thing. We'll continue to evaluate capital returns. And when we find that it's the right time, then we would actually act on that.

And I'll ask Rob maybe to take the M&A portion of that.

Robert Krcmarov

Okay. And thanks for your question, Harrison. On M&A, one of the things I'll point you to is we have exceptionally long mine lives. They're not quite but almost all the peer average. And so we have visibility over the horizon. I think the other thing to note is that we're kind of unique in our space in that we have more silver exposure than the majority of our peers. And so we want to preserve that. You asked about the criteria. So we want to stay a silver company. We also want to stay in relatively safe jurisdictions. We're currently in Canada and the U.S. I mean you have to go where the scarce quality assets are.

And so does that mean that we're going to be here forever? Probably not. We'll probably look at other jurisdictions, but we do a proper detailed analysis on what a relative lease safe jurisdiction looks like.

So as a rule of thumb, I've said anything in the top 1/3 of the [ Fraser ] Institute Index, we take a look at that country, but we wouldn't just use it as a tick-box we would do a thorough risk assessment and understand whether we are comfortable with those risks, whether we can mitigate some of them or whether it's simply not for us.

Our M&A appetite right now, as I said, it's -- we already have a future that's with plotted out of plus 20 million ounces and investing in our organic projects that we already own, we already control. We understand that deeply. That's our path forward. But if something comes along, we have time. We can be thoughtful and diligent and thorough we have time. If something compelling comes along that meets our investment criteria, we will act. But again, I'll just point you to our practices for organic growth. Obviously, M&A is a tool that's available to us. Would you just be very disciplined about how we do that.

Unknown Analyst

That's great detail. Separately, I wanted to ask on Keno Hill. Could you frame up the outlook for processed grades a bit more there? It's obviously a very high-grade deposit. Wondering under the lower throughput than greater set activity plan, what are the goalposts for process grades into Q4 and over the next couple of years until the permit amendments come in?

Robert Krcmarov

Well, I'll start. There's a few things that pulled down the grade in the first half. We had less output from the bear zone, which is obviously a high-grade zone. We also had a dilution because we were mining some remnant areas that comes at a higher cost and lower grade. And we moved into the Arctic zone. And then we also -- plus there was also a sequencing at Birmingham and [ Flame & Moth ]. Those issues have since been mitigated, and so mill grade went from about 19 ounces per tonne in Q2 to about 26% in Q3. I expect that the grade will be maintained at roughly reserve grade. Any comment on that, Brian or Carlos?

Carlos Aguiar

But we expect silver production to decline by proportionally less because we expect to be more selective, not only on mining but also in processing. We will be focused on reducing dilution and prioritizing higher grade areas in mining and processing, while we stop biting lower very material for late process. So actual production will depend on grade mine in a mail, and we provide a specific silver ounce production guidance in February.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Wayne Lam from TD Securities.

Wayne Lam

Congrats on the good quarter. If I think back to early last year, you guys had already flagged some of the permitting constraints at Keno Hill and the potential to scale back or put a pause in operations.

So I guess two questions. Number one, with the silver price kind of back to -- is there potential to reevaluate a potential move to care and maintenance, given Keno Hill with slightly negative free cash flow this quarter at a $63 silver price?

And then number two, the Yukon seems to be quite a hot bed for development lately, and it seems like the province is keen to accelerate projects forward. So just wondering, is there something more project-specific at Keno that's holding up the permits?

Robert Krcmarov

I'll answer the care and maintenance question first. Our plan is to basically keep running within the current permits while we build our infrastructure. But as we point out on our 10-Q, it says the delays at any step restrictions on temporary waste stockpiling or reduced power from upon energy that can force further curtailment or halt.

And so if permits or infrastructure delayed or silver falls material, we could consider care and maintenance, but our preference is to keep the workforce. We can see the finish line roughly 3 years out, we've got a workforce that has increasingly understood the ore body and is becoming better and more efficient at mining it.

And so while it's not a huge burden on us, I think the optimum power forward is to keep it running for as long as we can and get through to the get through to mid- to late 2029 when we can see things really some of the constraints being removed and seeing the full potential coming out of Keno Hill.

On the Yukon, I mean we are the only significant operating public -- run by a public company mine in the Yukon. We already have strong support from the government. We've got a much better relationship with the First Nation [indiscernible] and so I think all stakeholders would like to see us be successful. We've had our stakeholders come out to site and visit us. And we're pretty proud of what we've accomplished there, particularly both in terms of the mining that we're doing, the responsible mining, but also the rehabilitation activities that we've done through ERDC, which is our rehabilitation unit, which is actually funded by the government.

Now the rehabilitation and the reclamation that they've been doing, it's highly visible to the community. Anyone who by the highway can see it improving week by week and month by month. Patrick, you've been up in the Yukon recently? Any comments there?

Patrick Malone

So I think you summarized it well. The relationships are solid. Permitting is moving forward. It is a deliberate process. We are planning on filing our project proposal by the end of the year, which is the first step in the [ Yeso ] review, the Federal review. And there's nothing specific that is delaying any of that that's currently in process. We're just working our way through that process.

Wayne Lam

Okay. Great. And then -- maybe just on the tailings reprocessing project. It seems like the results from environmentals has gone decently well with the Greens Creek material. So just wondering why you guys are now evaluating multiple avenues outside of that? And in particular, if you were to go down the route of building your own facility, isn't that something that could maybe be seen as outside the scope of expertise for Hecla and add quite a bit on time line to realization?

Robert Krcmarov

[indiscernible] why don't you take that.

Unknown Executive

Yes. So we mentioned the third party we've been working with, and we've got a long relationship with them. And certainly, their technology seems to be working out well in the studies that we've done. The other two pads really do just give us optionality. You think about that site. If you could shift tails off as a low-grade concentrate, it definitely helps the environmental aspects of closure for that site and some of the long-term expansion costs on the sales facility.

As far as reprocessing, that's essentially what we're building at the mill. We're building a pyrite concentrate, which is a circuit, which is what we would do with the tails facility. So we're making a pyrite concentrate as well within our wheelhouse because we're already going to be doing that. So those studies will get started. Again, we should have some metallurgical results. We're a little bit worried about the oxidation of that material. But we need to determine what the metallurgical results are and how it will float. But I don't think there's really any significant technical concerns there.

The other thing it gives us optionality to look at all three because potentially, there is a combination of three options for addressing the tailings facility to monetize that. So I think all of them are still viable paths. And I think over the next year, 6, 8 months, we'll start to really narrow in on what we're going to do. And I guess, from a capital standpoint, the cost of building a pyrite circuit at the mill will give us indications for costs for building reprocessing facility should we do that. So we'll have a lot of information coming in, in the next several months that will guide our path forward.

Robert Krcmarov

Yes. So just to circle back to your initial concern, Wayne, about stepping out of our wheelhouse, we're not stepping out of our wheel house. So the pyrite concentrate circuit, that's proven technology, very low technical risk, that's what we're doing on material that we're producing presently. And essentially, all we're doing is mirroring that and looking at putting in a port concentrate circuit for the existing tails. As Brian said, we need to do some drilling and characterization and see how much oxidation has happened. But we're not really straying into new areas that we're not familiar with at all.

Wayne Lam

Okay. Great. And then -- maybe just last one. Following up on the capital returns. Rob, when you joined, obviously, the company was in a much different position on balance sheet and the silver-linked dividend was eliminated. So just wondering if there's potential for you guys to institute some type of attributable linked returns program at some point.

And I mean, it's Russell's comment. I think we understand on future capital needs, but with the balance sheet growing as is, maybe you'll even be in a position soon to build [ Libby ] on a stand-alone basis at some point.

Unknown Executive

That's the joke, by the way.

Robert Krcmarov

You had me pause, but thank you. On the capital returns, obviously, at the rate that we've been building cash on the balance sheet, there will come a point probably sometime in the first half of next year that we have to seriously look at returns.

What that looks like, whether it's if there's a dislocation in how we value our assets compared to where the market values the assets, we look at share buybacks. I don't know about doing silver-linked dividend. That's never really worked for anyone, not in the gold space, not in our space. So probably unlikely, but dividends, we will consider that. I expect we're going to have a much more robust discussion at the Board in the first half of next year.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of [ Tosin Gala ] from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Unknown Analyst

Guys congrats on the quarter. My name is [ Tosin Gala ], I'm asking on behalf of [indiscernible] tariff adjustment. Maybe I'll start with Greens Creek. At Greens Creek [indiscernible] rate but lower year-on-year. And 3Q AC was approximately, I think, of $5 per house up the year to the average. I just wanted to ask how much of the video temporary related to maintain some mining question. vessels indicative of the cost upgrade profile entering into 2027.

Robert Krcmarov

I'm sorry, I found it very, very hard to hear. Did anyone hear that, I'd be able to answer that?

Unknown Executive

Could you just -- you're a bit quiet. Could you repeat your question?

Unknown Analyst

Yes. So saying Greens Creek, throughput and silver grade booked lower year-on-year and 3Q was approximately $5 above the year-to-date average. How much of the variance was temporary related to maintenance and mine sequence. And that was indicative of the cost and with profile entering into 2027.

Russell Lawlar

I think, [ Tosin ] your question, if I heard that at least the first half of that was Green Street grades this year are lower than they were last year. And so Brian Erickson sitting here with us as our GM there for a long time.

I think that my perspective on Greens Creek is that Greens Creek is the complexity of Greens Creek is what creates a lot of the value at Greens Creek. And the grades at Greens Creek will fluctuate. Sometimes they'll be higher, sometimes they'll be lower. I don't know if you have any comment on that, Brian.

And then secondly, my -- you mentioned throughput as well, [ Tosin ], and I see throughput in 2025 was higher than 2026. And I think maybe, Brian, you could speak a bit to that as it relates to some of the projects we did earlier in the year.

Brian Erickson

Yes, I think [ Brussels ] is correct and the silver, it fluctuates up through the grades pretty significantly, and we obviously, at times, see surprises if they are very good. And sometimes we go through lower grade zones. So it's nothing unexpected.

As to the throughput, yes, it is a bit lower that site. I think we've communicated has gone through some pretty significant mill work in the last couple of years, which will continue into next year. that's definitely affecting production. But nothing I'm concerned about longer term.

Unknown Executive

And the sustaining infrastructure repairs that we are doing in the missile is to be prepared for the next years of the life of Greens Creek.

Unknown Analyst

And maybe just one additional question on Keno Hill. Realistically speaking, I mean can Keno Hill commercial production at reduced operating rates. And what was the slowdown for the company's ton target of 20 million ounces of [indiscernible] production?

Russell Lawlar

So [ Tosin ], again, I'm going to restate at least a little bit that I heard, and I apologize again because I'm having a hard time hearing you, but I think you started with commercial production at Keno Hill. And the criteria for commercial production in Keno Hill is well defined in our 10-Q. What I would say is that with the suppression of production that we've talked about, we wouldn't expect to see that commercial production happen until later this decade or early next. What I would say on that though is well is that doesn't actually impact the -- any of the accounting of the costs. So all that is, is just a mining term that we use under U.S. GAAP.

Unknown Analyst

Right. And I mean, what does that slowdown mean for the company's medium-term target of 20 million ounces?

Russell Lawlar

What does that have to do with the impact on getting to an ounce target. Is that what you're suggesting?

Robert Krcmarov

To the $20 million. We flagged that the $20 million is -- we expect to achieve that in the medium term. And so again, this slowdown is the production, while we organize the investments in infrastructure and get the critical permits that we need.

Probably around about mid-2029, then we should be relatively unconstrained and be able to ramp production back up to 440 tonnes per day. Longer term, beyond that, the mill is actually rated at beyond 600 tonnes per day. But that would require another phase of investment and another phase of permitting. So that's longer term.

So the incremental reduction in production at Keno Hill, we expect that to last roughly 3 years and then you'll see that increase beyond what we've basically been producing throughout its history, actually. So no impact to our 20 million-ounce a year target, again, flagging that, that's in the medium term.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Cosmos Chiu from CIBC. Please go ahead.

Cosmos Chiu

Maybe my first question is going back to Keno Hill. Yesterday, you talked in detail about the tailings capacity constraints. Is that something new? It's certainly something newer to me. I know you kind of touched on it in your Q2 MD&A. But previous to that, it was more talking about the permitted capacity of 440 tonnes per day, courts, mining license, water license. Are these all sort of interrelated? And if the tailings capacity constraint is not new to you, is the mid 2029 sort of timeline view? Is that why you to kind of curtail your throughput starting in Q4?

Robert Krcmarov

No, it's not new. And yes, they are all interrelated. So again, just to recap, I think one of the new things is we've quantified that we've got 200,000 tonnes of tailings left. So that's what we have to play with.

We need to obviously get the permits to increase tailings capacity. As we're mining, we're also generating waste, so there is a limit on that. And then we're also -- as we're doing more development and more mining, we're generating more water. And so we need to treat that water to the same standards that we agreed to. So it's all -- a lot of it's permitting related. Nothing really new here. Patrick, can you add some more color?

Patrick Malone

Yes. So as Rob said, there are sort of three constraints that are currently in place. It's tailings capacity, waste rock capacity and ability to handle water that we encounter through our water treatment plants. Those aren't new constraints. What we -- I think we have provided is a little more clarity on how we're planning to manage those constraints until we receive our permits, which we expect mid-2029.

Cosmos Chiu

Great. And then Patrick or maybe Rob, as you mentioned, there's three different constraints, tailings capacity, waste rock and water treatment, which is the biggest constraint? Are they all sort of about the same?

Patrick Malone

I would say that the tailings is a fixed constraint in that we know how much we have permitted capacity ahead of us. The other two are a bit more variable. They depend on things which are, to some degree, a bit outside of our control. We're not sure when we will in counter water, we have models. We think that we know what's ahead of us, but there is a bit of uncertainty around that. But tailings is a hard constraint, and that's what we're using to base our plan on currently.

Cosmos Chiu

Great. And then also at Keno Hill. And Rob, it was great to hear that you have four drills on site, and there's exploration success at Keno Hill. But I guess my question is, could you maybe talk me through the rationale in terms of drilling in the near term at Keno Hill. It's great, flame and moth feet to the southwest of the existing resources. But you have this kind of near-term or intermediate-term constraint on milling capacity.

So do you need to find more [indiscernible]? Or what's the return on this? Or are you trying to find higher-grade ounces so that you can actually feed it into the mill at a lower capacity?

Robert Krcmarov

High-grade ounces is always the target. And that's where Kurt and his team have been having a lot of success. You have a look at that Birmingham dips as we head down plunge, the grades get even higher.

We're also targeting -- and again, most of our exploration in the district is near mine. We're working in and around the existing ore bodies. We're not really going out to any of 17 targets that could have more than 50 million-ounce potential. We're really sticking close to where we have existing developments, so we can basically monetize any wins there.

Again, in the medium term, we're excited by that area along strike continuing to step up from Birmingham to the north, I guess it is, where you have the convergence of the historic [ hectare adamant ]. There's just a handful of holes there, and that's really where everything is pointing to us that they could be larger resources available -- sorry, I should have referred to you.

Unknown Executive

No, I think you covered it well. I think the one of the goals at the Birmingham towards the Hecla [ callumen ] is that we think that the fluid source for both those deposits are probably the same. And so there could be a big price between those two deposits. All of our drilling has been focused near mine near the Birmingham, near Flame & Moth trying to increase resources and reserves at the operating mines.

Robert Krcmarov

If you picked up on an important point, Cosmos, and that's the high-grade point. It's not just finding high grade. It's actually mining high grade by reducing dilution. And so that's going to be a focus of us. We're looking at various options that we were talking about. Brian, can you talk about the mechanical cutting and stuff? .

Brian Erickson

Yes. We're obviously giving guidance. We're going to reduce tonnage there, but it's -- we're not resting on that. We've been working for a number of years to reduce the mining widths and reduce that dilution. We've got some testing underway at the mill to determine potential opportunities to reduce dilution and thinning or feed. So there's a lot of work going on this. We'll update you as we get some highlights from some of this stuff this work we're doing.

Cosmos Chiu

I guess, Rob, to ask you more directly, do you need to find more ounces, even if it's near mine when you have this constrained near term to 300 tonnes per day?

Robert Krcmarov

I don't think we need to find more ounces. We've already got a reserve life that's -- I think it's like about 15 years or something like that. And we're yet to develop the Birmingham dex, which is higher grade. We don't need more ounces. What we need to do is get the throughput. It's got high fixed costs, as you know. And so that denominator is a little bit low. And so once we unconstraint it and we can develop faster, we can mine faster. We generate more water. We can treat that water. We can place the tailings and the waste. You'll see it start to approach its full potential under the 440 limit from around about 2029 onwards.

Cosmos Chiu

Great. And then, Rob, maybe one last question. It's great to see that in an industry where everyone else is talking about inflation and input costs being higher, and we've seen a number of companies increased their on sustaining cost guidance for 2020. You've actually gone in the other direction and you've decreased it, which is great.

But maybe can you talk about how much of that is attributable to byproduct credits. And could you maybe talk about labor input costs? Are you seeing any pressure especially, say, in the Silver Valley because I've heard Silver Valley competition has been pretty high in terms of labor, in terms of cost and whatnot. Could you maybe touch on all that, Rob, or maybe Russell?

Russell Lawlar

Yes. Yes, Cosmos, I certainly can take that. And I agree with you that it's great that we're able to improve our all-in sustaining costs. And that took place for really a few reasons. One was byproduct credits, right? When we came into the year, we had to make assumptions as it related to specifically gold and zinc and one of the things that sometimes people forget about is the large byproduct credit that Greens Creek does have in zinc. And both of those have been more favorable than the assumptions that we made, and that's part of what we're seeing during the year.

And then also, keep in mind, our sustaining capital also went down slightly, so that also improved our own sustaining costs.

From the perspective of kind of just production costs and we do see about 50% of our cost comes from labor. And that will be something, as we see competition for miners, whether that's in the Silver Valley or elsewhere, that will be something that we're going to have to keep up with.

I think in the current term, you can see in our cost structure, we've not been impacted significantly, but it will be something that we'll have to keep in mind as we go forward.

Operator

This completes the time allotted for questions. If you have any additional questions, please reach out to Mike Parkin via the contact link on the website.

I will now turn the call back to Rob Krcmarov, President and CEO, for closing remarks.

Robert Krcmarov

Well, thank you. And just to pick up on that point, I do encourage you, I know that we've run out of our allocated time, but your questions are important to us. So please do reach out after this call. And so thank you all for the thoughtful questions today, and thanks for joining us this morning.

I'm going to leave this with you. We're in the strongest financial position this company has ever been in. We're well positioned to achieve our 2026 guidance, and we're putting that strength to work for our shareholders, and we look forward to updating you again next quarter. Thanks, and have a great day.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.