tradingkey.logo
搜尋

ZachXBT accuses Western European institution of hiding $133M crypto theft

Cryptopolitan2026年11月3日 11:55
facebooktwitterlinkedin

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT noted Tuesday that the still undisclosed crypto loss at an unnamed Western European institution has climbed past $133 million, up from the $106 million figure he cited one day earlier.

ZachXBT, who has previously forced disclosures after going public with crypto breaches, is now alleging that the affected EU entity is concealing the breach rather than reporting it to EU authorities.

Is an EU bank hiding a crypto hack?

ZachXBT wrote on his Telegram channel early Tuesday that “My working theory is a large financial institution in Western Europe was exploited and it’s currently being covered up.” 

The blockchain investigator noted that the loss estimate is now up to $133 million after another $27 million in withdrawals were processed through centralized exchanges. ZachXBT also noted that the withdrawals have continued even after his initial Monday disclosure.

Despite multiple flags of the incident, the victim has gone unnamed. The cover-up claim has not been independently verified either. 

ZachXBT did not suspect North Korea’s Lazarus Group involvement, noting that the laundering pattern did not resemble routes used by the notorious unit implicated in many of the largest breaches to hit the crypto industry.

Notably, ZachXBT noted that more than $30 million of the funds suspected of being stolen would have fallen within the EU’s freeze net if the incident had been reported. 

Three exchanges drained in a day

Analytics firm Bitquery tracked $108.8 million linked to the incident on-chain, citing transfers that started Sunday, November 1, from Kraken, Crypto.com and OKX accounts and over roughly 21 hours.

Loss climbs to $133M as ZachXBT accuses European institution of crypto theft cover-up
How stolen exchange funds were drained, scattered, converted and hidden. Source: Bitquery on-chain analysis

Bitquery noted that most of the money moved as USDC to 15 wallets, 11 of which those same exchanges had paid before the theft. 

That detail led Bitquery to conclude the attacker held the victim’s keys and exchange logins. The working theory is that the attacker has compromised the owner’s devices, or at least someone on the victim’s team. 

Eight of the compromised wallets were Trust Wallet smart accounts. Bitquery has stressed that the incident does not indicate a flaw in the Trust Wallet app.

After the theft, the funds were quickly moved from freezable to unfreezable assets. They exchanged roughly $62.98 million in stablecoins into 27,553 ETH through UniswapX over about four hours. 

From there, the funds were routed into Monero (XMR) and across bridges. 

About $78.3 million still sat on Ethereum in attacker-linked wallets as of 13:47 UTC on November 2, Bitquery said. The firm said the attacker’s wallet still holds $3.74 million in USDC. That’s money that Circle can still freeze.

Loss climbs to $133M as ZachXBT accuses European institution of crypto theft cover-up
Where the money sits now. Source: Bitquery on-chain analysis

Why a bank victim would land differently

ZachXBT’s theory points at a category of firm that only recently joined the market. European banks spent 2026 moving into crypto under the bloc’s Markets in Crypto-Assets rules, and lenders now make up close to 23% of the crypto-asset service providers on the EU’s MiCA register as of September. 

Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest lender, was targeting MiCA approval for digital-asset custody.

Cryptopolitan’s earlier report on the $106 million drain noted the same pattern across the Binance and Bitget hacks: attackers convert stablecoins into Ether and privacy coins before Circle or Tether can act.

The disclosure question

The cover-up accusation matters most if the victim is a financial entity. Under the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), in force since January 17, 2025, financial firms including crypto-asset service providers must flag and report major ICT-related incidents to supervisors through a first alert, a follow-up update and a closing report, according to France’s markets regulator, the AMF.

ZachXBT’s point is that the delay carried a direct cost. Without disclosure, he argues, roughly $30 million flowed out of reach that authorities could have locked. 

Whether any DORA-covered entity is involved is unconfirmed, and no regulator has named a victim.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

免責聲明:本網站提供的資訊僅供教育和參考之用,不應視為財務或投資建議。

推薦文章

tradingkey.logo
風險提示:我們的網站和行動應用程式僅提供關於某些投資產品的一般資訊。Finsights 不提供財務建議或對任何投資產品的推薦,且提供此類資訊不應被解釋為 Finsights 提供財務建議或推薦。
投資產品存在重大投資風險,包括可能損失投資的本金,且可能並不適合所有人。投資產品的過去表現並不代表其未來表現。
Finsights 可能允許第三方廣告商或關聯公司在我們的網站或行動應用程式的任何部分放置或投放廣告,並可能根據您與廣告的互動情況獲得報酬。
© 版權所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版權所有