칼라일 컴퍼니즈(CSL) 2026년 3분기 실적 컨퍼런스 콜: 매출 9% 증가, 비용 회수 지연
칼라일 컴퍼니스는 2026년 3분기 견조한 지붕 개보수 수요와 가격 인상에 힘입어 매출이 전년 동기 대비 9% 증가한 15억 달러를 기록했으며, 조정 EPS는 6% 증가한 5.92달러로 3분기 기준 역대 최고치를 달성했다. 다만 원자재 및 화물 운송비 인플레이션이 가격 인상폭을 상회하면서 조정 EBITDA 마진은 23.8%로 210bp 하락했다.
경영진은 당초 예상보다 1분기 늦어진 2026년 말 시점에 가격과 원가의 균형이 이뤄질 것으로 전망하고 있으며, 이 전망은 투입 원가와 운송비가 안정적으로 유지되고 글로벌 시장이 추가로 악화되지 않는다는 가정을 전제로 한다. 4분기 연결 매출은 한 자릿수 후반대 성장이 예상되며, '비전 2030' 목표 달성 의지는 유지되고 있다.
칼라일 컴퍼니스(Carlisle Companies, CSL)는 견조한 지붕 개보수 수요, 가격 인상 및 시장 점유율 확대에 힘입어 2026년 3분기 매출 증가와 3분기 기준 역대 최고 조정 EPS를 기록했다고 발표했다. 원자재 및 화물 운송비 인플레이션이 마진에 지속적인 압박을 가하면서 당초 예상했던 가격/원가 균형 달성이 1분기 지연되었다.
핵심 요약
- 3분기 매출은 전년 동기 대비 9% 증가한 15억 달러를 기록했으며, 조정 EPS는 6% 증가한 5.92달러로 3분기 역대 최고치를 기록했다.
- 조정 EBITDA는 3억 4,800만 달러로 전년과 거의 비슷한 수준을 유지했다. 원자재 및 화물 운송 비용이 가격 인상분보다 더 빠르게 상승함에 따라 조정 EBITDA 마진은 210bp 하락한 23.8%를 기록했다.
- CCM 매출은 한 자릿수 중반대의 지붕 개보수 성장과 가격 인상에 힘입어 8% 증가한 11억 달러를 기록했다. CWT 매출은 시장 점유율 확대와 지붕 코팅 수요 호조로 9% 증가한 3억 7,900만 달러를 기록했다.
- 경영진은 당초 예상보다 1분기 늦어진 2026년 말 시점에 가격/원가 균형이 이뤄질 것으로 현재 전망하고 있다. 이 전망은 투입 원가와 화물 운송비가 안정적으로 유지되고 글로벌 시장이 추가로 악화되지 않는다는 가정을 전제로 한다.
- 4분기 연결 매출은 한 자릿수 후반대의 성장률을 기록할 것으로 예상되며, CCM과 CWT 모두 한 자릿수 후반대의 성장세를 보일 것으로 전망된다. 연결 조정 EBITDA 마진은 전년 동기 대비 보합세를 보일 것으로 예상된다.
- 칼라일은 자체 성장, 생산성 향상, 자사주 매입, 엄선된 M&A를 바탕으로 조정 EPS 40달러, ROIC 25% 이상이라는 '비전 2030' 목표 달성에 대한 의지를 유지하고 있다.
핵심 재무 데이터
| 지표 | 2026년 3분기 실적 | 전년 동기 대비 변동 / 문맥 |
|---|---|---|
| 매출 | 15억 달러 | 9% 증가 |
| 조정 EBITDA | 3억 4,800만 달러 | 거의 보합 |
| 조정 EBITDA 마진 | 23.8% | 210bp 하락 |
| 조정 EPS | 5.92달러 | 6% 증가, 3분기 역대 최고 |
| CCM 매출 | 11억 달러 | 8% 증가 |
| CCM 조정 EBITDA | 3억 600만 달러 | 1% 증가 |
| CCM 조정 EBITDA 마진 | 28.2% | 200bp 하락 |
| CWT 매출 | 3억 7,900만 달러 | 9% 증가 |
| CWT 조정 EBITDA | 6,800만 달러 | 13% 증가 |
| CWT 조정 EBITDA 마진 | 18.0% | 60bp 상승 |
| 계속영업활동 현금흐름 | 3억 1,400만 달러 | 매출 성장 및 원자재 비용 상승 지원을 위해 운전자본 증가 |
| 계속영업 잉여현금흐름 | 2억 7,700만 달러 | 설비투자 3,700만 달러 차감 후 |
| 현금 및 현금성자산 | 5억 4,700만 달러 | 2026년 9월 30일 기준 |
| EBITDA 대비 순부채 비율 | 1.8배 | 칼라일의 목표 범위인 1~2배 이내 |
2026년 첫 9개월간 계속영업 잉여현금흐름은 총 4억 700만 달러를 기록했다. 칼라일은 해당 분기 동안 3억 5,000만 달러 상당의 자사주를 매입하여 연간 누적 자사주 매입액이 8억 5,000만 달러에 달했다. 배당금 1억 4,000만 달러를 포함해 주주 환원 총액은 9억 9,000만 달러에 이르렀다.
사업 및 경영 성과
칼라일 건설 자재
CCM 매출은 물량 증가와 가격 인상 효과 개선이 비주거용 신축 건물의 지속적인 침체를 상쇄하며 8% 증가했다. 지붕 개보수 수요는 한 자릿수 중반대 비율로 성장한 반면, 신축 수요는 비슷한 비율로 감소했다.
경영진은 유통 채널 재고가 정상 수준을 유지하고 있으며 10월 수주 실적이 견조했다고 밝혔다. 또한 가격 인상 조치 이후 수요의 유의미한 변화가 없었으며 프로젝트 지연이나 취소도 유의미하게 증가하지 않았다고 전했다.
데이터 센터는 중요한 성장 요인이었다. 경영진은 전담 시장 팀, 확보된 생산 능력, PVC 공급 부족 속 프리미엄 TPO 지붕 시스템의 채택 증가 등에 힘입어 3분기 칼라일의 데이터 센터 사업이 약 200% 성장했다고 밝혔다.
CCM의 마진 감소는 주로 원자재 및 화물 운송비 인플레이션이 가격 인상폭을 상회한 데 기인한다. 다만 영업 레버리지, 칼라일 운영 시스템 생산성 향상, 비용 통제를 통해 이러한 압박을 일부 상쇄했다.
칼라일 웨더프루핑 테크놀로지스
CWT 매출은 시장 점유율 확대와 기후 요인에 따른 지붕 코팅 수요 증가가 주거 및 비주거용 신축 건물 수요 침체를 상쇄하면서 9% 증가했다. 조정 EBITDA는 13% 증가했으며, 마진은 60bp 확대된 18.0%를 기록했다.
자동화, 사업장 통합, 자체 발포폴리스티렌(EPS) 수지 생산, M&A 시너지 등이 실적 개선을 뒷받침했다. 칼라일은 이러한 구조적 효율화 투자가 2026년에 2,000만~3,000만 달러 기여하고, 추가적인 혜택이 2027년 1분기까지 이어질 것으로 기대하고 있다.
혁신 및 자본 배치
칼라일은 2026년 계획된 12개 제품 중 9개를 출시했으며, 나머지 제품 출시도 예정대로 진행 중이다. 회사는 최근 5년간 출시된 신제품을 통해 전체 매출의 25%를 달성하겠다는 목표를 지속 추진하고 있다.
분기 배당금은 주당 1.25달러로 14% 인상되어 50년 연속 연간 배당금 인상을 기록했다. 경영진은 또한 연간 자사주 매입 목표치인 12억 달러를 유지했다.
경영진 전망치
- 2026년 4분기 연결 매출: 전년 동기 대비 한 자릿수 후반대 성장.
- 2026년 4분기 부문별 매출: CCM과 CWT 모두 한 자릿수 후반대 성장.
- 2026년 4분기 조정 EBITDA 마진: 전년 동기 대비 보합세 예상.
- 4분기 부문별 마진: CCM은 전년 동기 대비 보합세 예상, CWT는 약 100bp 개선 전망.
- CCM 가격 실현율: 3분기 약 4%에서 4분기 전년 동기 대비 약 7%로 확대 예상.
- 2026년 연간 ROIC: 약 25%.
- 2026년 연간 잉여현금흐름 마진: 약 15%.
- 가격/원가 전망: 경영진은 2026년 말 시점에 균형 달성을 예상하며, 기존 가격 정책이 2027년 마진에 긍정적 요인으로 작용할 가능성이 있음.
본 전망치는 신축 건물 시장의 회복을 전제로 하지 않는다. 또한 예상되는 가격/원가 균형 달성은 투입 원가 및 화물 운송비가 현 수준에서 안정적으로 유지되는지 여부에 달려 있다. 추가적인 가격 인상 조치는 해당 전제 조건에 포함되어 있지 않다.
리스크 및 주시해야 할 요인
- 중동 지역의 분쟁 재발로 인해 석유계 원자재, 디젤 유류비 및 화물 운송비가 경영진의 기존 예상치를 상회했다.
- 미국 디젤 가격은 9월 말 갤런당 약 6.50달러에 달했으며 6.35달러 선을 유지해 전년 동기 대비 약 75% 높았다.
- 3분기 합산 원자재 및 화물 운송 비용은 10%대 후반의 비율로 증가했다. 비용이 현 수준을 유지할 경우, 경영진은 4분기에 10%대 중후반의 증가율을 보일 것으로 예상한다.
- 주거 및 비주거용 신축 건물 시장이 여전히 침체되어 있으며, 경영진은 단기적인 회복을 기대하지 않고 있다.
- 칼라일이 기존 견적 및 확정 주문 금액을 준수함에 따라 통상 3~6개월의 시차가 발생하여, 가격 인상 실현이 인플레이션을 계속 밑돌고 있다.
- 경영진은 MDI 및 폴리올 공급 제약 완화가 2027년까지 비용 개선을 지원할 것으로 기대하고 있으나, 원자재나 화물 운송비 인플레이션이 추가 발생할 경우 추가적인 가격 인상이 이뤄질 수 있다.
애널리스트 Q&A 주요 내용
- 가격 인상 및 원가 회복: 경영진은 3분기 CCM 가격 실현율이 약 4%였음을 확인했으며 4분기에는 약 7%를 예상한다고 밝혔다. 비용이 현 수준을 유지하더라도 2027년에는 기존 가격이 현재 원가를 상회할 것으로 보이며, 원가 하락 시 추가적인 이익이 제공될 것이다.
- 데이터 센터 성장: 칼라일은 전담 데이터 센터 팀, 사용 가능한 생산 능력, Carlisle Experience 및 TPO 대안에 대한 인지도 향상 덕분에 해당 시장에서 3분기 약 200% 성장했다고 설명했다.
- 지붕 개보수 회복력: 경영진은 4분기 및 2027년을 앞두고 프로젝트 시기, 고객 행동 또는 지붕 개보수 파이프라인의 변화가 없다고 보고했다. 북미 비주거용 건물 재고의 70% 이상이 25년 이상 되어 지속적인 교체 수요를 뒷받침한다.
- CWT 생산성: 효율성 투자가 거의 완료되었으며, 현재 프로젝트에서 발생하는 이월 효과는 2027년 1분기 이후 제한적일 것으로 예상된다. 그럼에도 경영진은 자동화 및 칼라일 운영 시스템 성숙을 통한 추가적인 기회가 있다고 판단한다.
- 투입 원가 부담 완화: 경영진은 4분기 중 일부 MDI 비용 절감을 예상하며, 2027년 1분기에는 공장에 추가적인 혜택이 이를 것으로 본다. 폴리올 공급 개선 역시 2027년 동안 비용 부담 완화를 지원할 것으로 보인다.
- 경쟁 환경: 칼라일은 경쟁이 치열하지만 비교적 큰 변화는 없다고 설명했다. 신규 진입자가 판매량에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않았으며, 유통 관계도 건전하고 공고하게 유지되고 있다.
실적 발표 스크립트 전문
전체 실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 녹취록
경영진 발표
Operator
Good afternoon. My name is Megan, and I will be your conference call operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Carlisle Companies Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]
I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Mehul Patel, Carlisle's Vice President of Investor Relations. Mehul please go ahead.
Mehul Patel
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon. On behalf of Carlisle, welcome. Earlier today, we reported third quarter results. The press release and the slides are available on the Investor Relations page of our website. With me on the call are Chris Koch, our Chair of the Board, President and CEO; and our Chief Financial Officer, Kevin Zdimal. Chris will start with his perspective on pricing, raw materials, margins and competitive dynamics. Kevin will then review our financial results and fourth quarter outlook and Chris will follow with their Vision 2030 priorities, and then we'll take your questions.
Before we begin, please turn to Slide 2. Today's remarks contain forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual outcomes to differ are described in our SEC filings and today's press release, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements except as required by law. We will also refer to non-GAAP financial measures with reconciliations in today's presentation and press release.
With that, I'll hand the call to Chris, starting on Slide 3.
D. Koch
Thank you, Mehul, and good afternoon, everyone. Our third quarter results build on the strong demand we saw in quarter 2. Despite significant market volatility, we maintained high single-digit growth, and importantly, demand remained resilient through our pricing actions. We remain focused on superior capital allocation and our path towards $40 of adjusted EPS in 2030. With that, let me turn to the key areas of focus as we enter the fourth quarter, price cost, margins, demand and the competitive environment.
Let me start with pricing. We addressed the cost increases that began in quarter 1 with multiple price increases and freight surcharges. Historically, price realization has lagged cost increases by approximately 3 to 6 months, primarily because we honor existing quotes and firm orders already in our system. On our quarter 2 call, we said we expected price cost to be close to parity in quarter 3 and then turned slightly positive in quarter 4. Unanticipated cost increases in quarter 3 did not change the shape or the direction of that curve but pushed the timing of achieving [ parity ] out by 1 quarter. Price realization and our freight surcharges are gaining meaningful traction, and we now expect to reach price cost parity as we exit 2026. Pricing has not had a detrimental impact on demand, and we saw no additional pre-buying in the quarter.
Our July outlook assumed raw material and freight costs would stabilize. Instead, oil and diesel costs rose further pressuring petrochemical-based raw materials, freight and virtually all of our costs. U.S. diesel reached record levels of about $6.50 per gallon in late September and was approximately $6.35 as of yesterday, roughly 75% higher than 1 year ago. Reaching parity as we exit this year assumes stability in input costs and freight and no further deterioration in global markets. we would expect the pricing we now have in place to be a tailwind in 2027. That brings us to margins.
Adjusted EBITDA held at $348 million on 9% revenue growth as volume leverage and Carlisle Operating System productivity helped offset inflation. Due to the unexpected cost increases in the third quarter margins declined more than we expected. We view the pressure as a timing issue, not a structural one. The drivers of margin expansion remain intact, and those are increasing price realization, freight offsets, Carlisle Operating System productivity, CWT efficiency programs, operating leverage and new products. As costs normalize, we would expect margin expansion to resume. And with that, our Vision 2030 targets are unchanged.
On the demand side, re-roofing at CCM continues to be a consistent mid-single-digit contributor as it has been for decades. Despite seeing some pre-buying activity ahead of the price increases in Q2, our channel inventories remain at normal levels. We confirmed this through hundreds of [ Carlisle ] market survey interviews and real-time feedback from our almost 1,000 person sales force. Data centers continue to build momentum, driven by our newly formed and dedicated data center market team. Our premium TPO portfolio and our manufacturing capacity is benefiting data center customers as [ PVC ] supply remains constrained and as these customers discover the excellent attributes of [ TPO ] for data center roofs. We thus expect the trend towards premium TPO systems on data centers to continue to increase. These factors help offset softness in new construction, which is a positive as our near-term outlook does not assume a recovery in new construction markets overall.
At CWT, where residential is roughly 45% of revenue. Share gains and cost actions are offsetting residential softness in sales. We also expect no near-term recovery in residential end markets as mortgage applications list price and home sales have declined sequentially. On the competitive front, our distribution relationships remain healthy, productive and aligned. We continue to monitor new market entrants in their investments, but we have not seen any meaningful impact them on our volumes.
Finally, capital allocation. Our balance sheet is strong. Repurchases are on track for $1.2 billion this year, and we are proud to be a dividend king with 50 consecutive years of dividend increases. And of course, our M&A criteria have not changed.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Kevin for the financials. And I will return to discuss our progress towards Vision 2030 before we end the call.
Kevin Zdimal
Thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. I will review our third quarter results and then discuss our outlook for the fourth quarter. Let's begin on Slide 3.
Our third quarter results demonstrate our team's ability to execute with discipline through macroeconomic challenges. Revenue increased 9% to $1.5 billion and adjusted EPS increased 6% to a third quarter record of $5.92. Demand remained healthy and our strategic initiatives once again drove above-market revenue growth in both segments. Price realization also contributed meaningfully and increased throughout the quarter. Importantly, we have not seen a material change in demand from our pricing actions or geopolitical developments. We have also not seen a meaningful increase in project delays or cancellations. Higher input costs remain the primary challenge in the quarter. Renewed escalation of the conflict in the Middle East drove petroleum-based raw material diesel and freight costs higher than we anticipated in our July outlook.
On our July call, we expected price cost to be neutral in the third quarter and positive in the fourth quarter. However, costs continued to increase, which pushed our recovery time line out 1 quarter. We now expect to reach price/cost parity as we exit 2026. As we have seen in prior inflationary cycles, price realization typically lags rising costs, and that timing pressured our margins in the third quarter.
Turning to Slide 4. Third quarter revenue increased 9% to $1.5 billion. Healthy reroofing demand, strong volume and price realization that increased through the quarter more than offset continued softness in residential and nonresidential new construction. Adjusted EBITDA was essentially flat at $348 million, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 23.8%, down 210 basis points year-over-year as raw material and freight costs increased faster than price realization during the quarter. Higher volume, disciplined cost management and Carlisle Operating System productivity helped offset that inflation and held adjusted EBITDA in line with the prior year. Record third quarter adjusted EPS of $5.92 increased 6% year-over-year, driven by higher segment earnings and an 8% lower diluted share count from share repurchases, partially offset by higher interest expense from the notes we issued in August 2025 and higher corporate compensation and benefit costs compared to the prior year.
Moving to CCM on Slide 5. CCM revenue increased 8% to $1.1 billion, driven by strong volume growth and price realization that built throughout the quarter. Reroofing demand remained healthy, growing mid-single digits, while new construction declined mid-single digits, and our end market grew low single digits overall. Chris will discuss the strategic initiatives behind our above-market growth.
On our second quarter call, we noted that customer prebuying ahead of announced price increases contributed a couple of percentage points to CCM's growth. Our strong third quarter volumes confirm that the vast majority of that growth came from end market demand. Channel inventories are at normal levels for this time of year, and October bookings remained strong. CCM adjusted EBITDA increased 1% to $306 million, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 28.2%, down 200 basis points year-over-year. The margin decline reflects further raw material and freight inflation from where we started the quarter, which outpaced our price realization. This was partially offset by operating leverage on higher volume, Carlisle Operating System productivity and cost controls.
Turning to CWT on Slide 6. Revenue increased 9% to $379 million, as share gains and weather conditions that drove demand for roof coatings more than offset continued softness in residential and nonresidential new construction. CWT adjusted EBITDA increased 13% to $68 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin was 18%, up 60 basis points year-over-year. Structural cost savings and higher volume drove that improvement, more than offsetting raw material and freight inflation that outpaced price realization.
Importantly, the structural efficiency initiatives at CWT are substantially complete and the benefits are building. Our investments in automation, footprint consolidation and in-house expanded polystyrene resin production are contributing and synergies from our recent insulation acquisitions are beginning to show in our results. Together with our October pricing and updated freight surcharges, these actions position CWT for stronger margin performance in the fourth quarter and into 2027.
Turning to Slide 7 and our financial position. As of September 30, 2026, we had $547 million in cash and cash equivalents and $1 billion available under our revolving credit facility. Net debt to EBITDA was 1.8x within our target range of 1 to 2x. This balance sheet strength provides significant flexibility to continue investing in organic growth, pursue disciplined M&A opportunities and return capital to shareholders.
Moving to cash flow on Slide 8. Third quarter operating cash flow from continuing operations was $314 million, and free cash flow from continuing operations was $277 million after $37 million of capital expenditures. The year-over-year decrease primarily reflects higher working capital to support increased sales and higher raw material costs. For the first 9 months, free cash flow from continuing operations was $407 million, and we expect a strong fourth quarter consistent with our normal seasonality. During the quarter, we repurchased $350 million of shares, bringing year-to-date repurchases to $850 million, including $140 million of dividends, we have returned $990 million to shareholders so far in 2026. We also increased our quarterly dividend by 14%, marking our 50th consecutive annual increase. We remain on track with our full year repurchase target of $1.2 billion, while preserving the capacity to pursue acquisitions that meet our criteria.
Turning to our fourth quarter outlook on Slide 9. We expect consolidated revenue to grow high single digits year-over-year with both CCM and CWT up high single digits. At CCM, pricing and reroofing demand are expected to more than offset slower new construction. At CWT, pricing and share gains are expected to more than offset continued softness in end markets. We expect fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA margin to be flat year-over-year as the benefit of our pricing actions continues to build against elevated input costs. For the full year, we expect ROIC of approximately 25% and free cash flow margin of approximately 15%. In both segments, we expect price cost to improve as realization builds, and we expect the benefit of our pricing actions to carry into 2027. Consistent with our approach throughout the year, our outlook does not assume a recovery in new construction.
Turning to our Vision 2030 financial goals on Slide 10. We remain confident in our long-term targets of $40 of adjusted EPS and ROIC above 25%. Our path is founded on above-market organic growth, Carlisle Operating System productivity, disciplined capital return through share repurchases and targeted synergistic M&A when the right opportunities are available at the right price. These are flexible, independent levers, and our strategy does not depend on all of them contributing significantly in every year. As we demonstrated under Vision 2025, when we exceeded our EPS goal 3 years ahead of schedule, the trajectory toward the target can accommodate choppy periods.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Chris.
D. Koch
Thank you, Kevin. The third quarter again demonstrated our focus on managing what we can control. Despite renewed escalation in the Middle East driving higher input costs and soft new construction both CCM and CWT grew faster than their end markets. Revenue increased 9%, and we delivered record third quarter adjusted EPS. Our teams price for value, maintain spending discipline delivered the Carlisle experience and continued investing for long-term growth.
Now I'd like to cover our progress on Vision 2030, starting with growth and innovation and then pricing actions behind our fourth quarter and 2027 outlook. Reroofing anchors our business, and this quarter has returned to the consistent multiyear mid-single-digit growth that we are used to experiencing from a dip to the low single-digit growth that we saw in the first half of this year. Since we introduced Vision 2030, reroofing has grown every year through very different market conditions. Why is that? Because more than 70% of the nonresidential building stock in North America is over 25 years old and for a building owner, replacing a roof is not a discretionary decision. That recurring demand gives us a steady base in any market.
New construction remains soft in geopolitical developments and recent interest rate increases have made the timing of a recovery less certain, but our plans do not depend on a market recovery. Carlisle was built to outgrow its markets and perform throughout the cycle, not just at the peak, and that strategy is delivering results. CCM revenue increased 8% and CWT increased 9% ahead of their end markets all the while price increases were moving through the market. Customers continue to choose Carlisle for the Carlisle experience, which is the right products in the right place at the right time, supported by our experienced employees.
Of all our Vision 2030 levers, innovation is the one I'm most excited about because its impact compounds over time. And importantly, innovation clearly delivers on the idea that price to value is a key attribute of differentiation and margin expansion, especially when customers experience the value to their business that new products provide. Over the past year, our voice of the customer process grounded in outcome-driven innovation has generated hundreds of new product ideas and validated active projects in our stage gate pipeline, and those products will drive measurable benefits to our customers. That work is translating into more new products in the market. We have launched 9 of our 12 planned projects for 2026. The remaining launches are on schedule, and we remain on track to generate 25% of total sales from products introduced in the past 5 years.
A solid example of innovation can be found in 2 of this fall's launches that will take [ Primer ] out of the job. [ BlueSkinSA-HPX ] for commercial walls which can be applied without [ primer ] year-round and [ vapor CL TRs ] for roofing, which requires no primer unapproved substrates, both eliminate an installation step and create value for our contractors.
On the retail front, Home Depot now carries Henry's UltraTouch made with 100% recycled denim insulation in over half its stores and sales continue to improve in stores that have carried it for a year or more. This month, we also launched a [ pay-per ] faced version for markets where building codes require moisture control with a broader rollout plan for February. Our other recent inductions, including SeamShield, [ RapidLock, VP Tech and Appeal ] continue to gain traction with contractors looking to get their crews to the next job faster. The expansion of our Research and Innovation Center that we broke ground on earlier this year will help us sustain an increasing cadence of new product introductions, shorten our time to market, expand margins and strengthen the proprietary capabilities that differentiate Carlisle. That work now has new leadership and has demonstrated our commitment to a robust succession planning process.
Dr. [ Justin Scape ] joined Carlisle in September as Senior Vice President of Research and Development, succeeding Dr. [ John Dobson ], who retired as planned after roughly 15 years across Henry and Carlyle. I want to thank John for his contributions and welcome Justin to the team.
Turning to the pricing actions behind our fourth quarter and 2027 outlook. At CCM, 3 price increases are now in the market from April, July and August, and we have executed freight surcharges for a third time. At CWT, our second waterproofing increase is in effect in October, along with updated freight policies. On the supply side, the force majeure declarations on [ MDI ] and polyols that were declared in May have begun to lift. Because of this, we expect MDI pricing to ease as we exit the year. We are hopeful that as we exit 2026, we will also see resolution to the global conflicts currently underway. And with that resolution, a meaningful cost relief as we move through 2027.
As those costs normalize, the pricing now in place should become a tailwind for our margins next year. Our experience would suggest that margin expansion follows cost normalization after a period of raw material inflation. However, if costs remain elevated or increase, we will evaluate further pricing actions as we have in the past cycles. Our approach remains disciplined and deliberate and we like where we stand heading into 2027.
Through all the volatility of 2026, Carlisle continued to generate substantial cash flow. We view capital allocation as a core competency, not a byproduct of the business. Whether we are investing in our businesses, pursuing acquisitions or repurchasing shares, our objective is the same, deploy capital where it creates the greatest long-term value for our shareholders. In August, our Board raised the quarterly dividend 14% to $1.25 per share, our 50th consecutive annual increase. We're pleased to reach this milestone and join the fewer than 60 companies that are part of this class known as Dividend Kings. This milestone reflects the durability of our business model and our long-standing commitment to returning capital to shareholders.
On the M&A front, we remain focused on acquisitions within the building envelope that support our market leadership position add to our system selling approach and increase our content per square foot. We seek deals that fit our 4 criteria: an existing organic growth story, tangible hard cost synergies, a strong management team ready to take on more and the ability to deploy the Carlisle Operating System, the Carlisle Experience and our integration playbook. Our commitment to being superior capital allocators will not change, and our shareholders can count on it.
Stepping back and simply putting it, demand held through our pricing actions and price is catching up with cost inflation. We are growing faster than our markets, funding innovation and returning substantial capital to our shareholders, all in a volatile cost environment, and we expect the benefit of our pricing to keep building through the fourth quarter and into 2027.
Carlisle operates an imperative business model. Buildings have to be built, maintained and improved over time, and we serve that need largely in North America, we believe, is the best building products market in the world. Reroofing gives us a recurring foundation of demand, and our cash generation allows us to keep investing through the cycle. The structural drivers behind our business from energy efficiency and the push for labor savings to a persistent housing shortage remain opportunities for long-term growth. Our priorities are unchanged heading into 2027, operational excellence, a better Carlisle experience, accretive M&A and value-creating innovation. We expect these growth initiatives to help offset end market conditions that could remain similar to those today.
That focus keeps us on the Vision 2030 path, and we remain confident in our targets. And I repeat this a lot, but it's a good reminder to all of us none of this happens without dedicated and driven people. From our sales teams in the field to our innovators in the labs, to our teams and our plants and in customer service. Thank you. You stayed focused on our customers through a demanding quarter and it shows in our results. That is why 3 times in the past 10 years, we have issued broad-based equity grants to give our employees a personal stake in Carlisle's performance were driven by shared success.
Thank you all for your time and continued interest in Carlisle. And with that, I'll turn it back to the operator to open the line for questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Tim Wojs from Baird.
질의응답
Timothy Wojs
Guys, good afternoon. Thanks for the time. Maybe just the first question I have, just -- can you talk about just what price realization was in Q3 and kind of what you exited the quarter with and what's in the guide for Q4, specifically for CCM? And you guys both mentioned that price cost to be positive in 2027. Is that just the timing dynamic of kind of pricing catching up to inflation? Or are you explicitly assuming that costs come down?
D. Koch
Yes. Tim, I think we made clear that we're seeing that price catch-up costs as we move through the third quarter and then into the fourth quarter. And I think as we exit '26, I said we're going to reach this parity. And then it will catch up and the pricing will exceed the cost. And I think even if [indiscernible] stay where they are today, we would expect to see some pricing tailwinds and then if they go down, obviously, it's even incrementally better. And then Kevin will touch on this specific pricing.
Kevin Zdimal
Yes. And the price realization, it's spot on to what we said in the Q2 call. We were about 4% in Q3 for CCM price increases. And then Q4 we're looking at about 7% of price realization on a year-over-year basis. So nothing has changed from a price realization. Obviously, the thing that changed was the raw material costs and freight that continue to escalate in Q3?
Timothy Wojs
Okay. And then just on data centers, like is there a way to size the benefit that you're getting on the volume side from just kind of being more involved in the data center business this year? And is it just because capacity is constrained in [ PBC ]? Or is there really a more structural opportunity for TPO there?
Operator
[Operator Instructions]
D. Koch
Megan, I'll answer this question. Thank you for that reminder. And Tim and group, I think there's 3 things of data centers that are helping us. I'm not going to exactly give you the total dollar impact because I don't want to give that to competitors, obviously. But our business in the third quarter, I think, was up something like 200%. And 3 things that are really driving it. One, we assembled quite maybe almost a year ago, a dedicated data center team. That was one of the actions that we committed to. And included in that are some [ BOC ] things that are going to help us there.
Two, we're obviously benefiting from the constraint in the industry on TPO and that kind of thing. And then three, I would say that we're benefiting from a greater awareness of Carlisle just being in the market and being a better provider and people take advantage of the Carlisle Experience. And I think it was pretty obvious earlier that we weren't there to the level we needed to be. And once we got in the game, people are seeing, yes, we have alternatives and other solutions as well as we've got a lot of capacity to be able to address their needs. And in really in a market where I think right now, speed is of the essence the Carlisle Experience of that right product, right place, right time and being able to exceed expectations is really benefiting us. So I think those are the 3 things that drove that growth in the third quarter.
And then as we go into fourth quarter next year, we want to get more on the front end of this and be a key part of the specifications that we do in all the other areas that we serve to. So that sums it up.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Susan Maklari
Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. Hello, everybody. My question is on the competitive environment that you're seeing? And how you're thinking about investing in the Carlisle experience and your service levels. And what that means for your ability to compete, especially in this kind of an environment that we're seeing and drive the outperformance that you've delivered for the last 2 quarters now relative to the market.
D. Koch
Thanks, Sue. I think -- it's a difficult environment for every. The volatility that's there. It doesn't contribute to anyone's planning and they don't want to have any waste out there. And I think that really hits on the Carlisle Experiences. It's just Carlisle has built up over all these years, just wonderful relationships on specifications. People can rely on our teams coming in there. While others may be looking to have cost cutting or maybe not adding as much as we mentioned, we continue to invest through the cycle. I think we have something like over 1,000 salespeople. I was just reading our NPS scores and there was a great correlation between frequency of contact with your salesperson and success at your job site. So I think at your office.
So I think this idea that Carlisle has an unbelievable structure put in place, and we continue to enhance it and just continue to drive that relationship, that steadiness, that reliability when it starts with order entry and getting -- being in a specification and then taking that out and being having your call answered right away or having a great rep call on you with immediate answers to your problems. And then moving it through our factories and seeing our team deliver something like let's say, 98% on-time delivery plus. So you know it's going to be there.
And then really warranty plays a big role as well. I think the investment in the warranty and the service we do in terms of inspections and things like that. Obviously, it gets you paid quicker, gives you confidence as an end user that you've got a great product on the roof and then the service afterwards in terms of training and other things like that.
So I think when we look at competition, I think we want to continue to invest to be the leader because we believe that I think it showed in the third quarter that even in a rising pricing environment where we tend to be the price leader, we're not seeing any suffering demand because I think people are seeing the value and that points right to innovation again. And what we want to do is drive innovation that provides value that we can actually monetize both the distributor of the contract or everyone in the system and can monetize that value creation we can to in terms of greater content per square foot in terms of greater margin per square foot.
Susan Maklari
Okay. That's very helpful. And just in general, how would you contextualize the competitive backdrop today?
D. Koch
I think the competitive backdrop is, I'm going to say, relatively unchanged. We've got some very good competitors that are out there. We've competed against them for a long time. They're well known. They have good leadership teams. You know the names. They're extremely professional. We mentioned years ago when [ John Omar ] went over to [ GAF ] and we saw the team at [ Ameris ] be created that we knew those were improvements in the management team.
So I'd say the competitive environment is still quite robust. I think the team's competitors do a good job every day. We have seen a couple of new entrants, but as we mentioned, as of yet, no real impact on us and our teams.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Bryan Blair from Oppenheimer.
Bryan Blair
You noted that structural cost savings continue to ramp at CWT from automation footprint consolidation, in-house resin capacity, likely some other factors as well. If we were to assume flat volume going forward, which is hopefully conservative given the share gains that your team is experiencing there. What would be the carryover cost savings or equivalently, the margin lift in 2027 under those circumstances?
Kevin Zdimal
Yes, I'll take that one. So Bryan, thanks for the question. As we talked about these investments that we made to improve operating efficiency at CWT, those were all substantially completed at the beginning of this year. So just as a reminder, for this year, we expect somewhere between $20 million and $30 million of contribution from these investments. We'll get a little bit of benefit carryover in Q1. And from these specific investments we made, the [indiscernible] gets that many more.
But with that said, there are a big runway where there's a lot more opportunities through similar types of investments and more automation, more maturity in COS and other things that we could do there. So we still believe the runway to get up to 30% is there through 2030 to get to our Vision 2030 targets, we have CWT getting up to 25%.
D. Koch
Yes. And Bryan, I'll just add and Mehul can jump in on this, too. But the progress that we made really got masked. I mean the team did an excellent job. And if they -- some are situation at CCM, if the cost has kind of continued to increase and overwhelm some of CWT's progress in the third quarter. I think Mehul told me it was multiple hundreds of basis points that without that rise, if we had just been where we were at the end of the second quarter, I think we would have had I mean what would you say, 500 basis points or something CWT improvement.
So it's real, it's there. Unfortunately, that continued escalation around materials and that lagged the pricing and certainly the diesel and freight [ search ] situation, took a lot of that good press that would have been in CWT and would have shown the great progress the team is making kind of masked it and so they didn't get credit for it.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Tomo Sano from JPMorgan.
Tomohiko Sano
Maybe on CCM, reroofing grew mid-single digit this quarter. So given everything that's changed recently, are you seeing any change in removing activities, whether in project timing, customer behavior or the pipeline as you look into 2027?
D. Koch
No, Tomo, we're not. Thanks for the question. As we mentioned, I think, in every one of these conference calls, that's a significant part of our business. We view it almost in a annuity-like manner in the sense that when you tend to work with Carlisle on your original roof, I think, and it's probably true with our competitors as well that you tend to stay with that when you do the reroof you set of distributors are doing a great job of paying attention to [indiscernible] age. Our contractors are providing service every day on those roofs and making repairs and that. And so there's quite a relationship there.
As well as we have the warranty data. And so we keep a really good track record of where we are with these jobs and when they need to be reverted and as many people, not just me even at other companies. They've said, reroofing is just not an option. You can delay it a little bit, but ultimately, you got to do that. So I don't see any change in reroofing demand as we go into the fourth quarter and as we go into 2027. And obviously, we like to see new construction to because that means more roofs to be roofed in 17 to 25 years as we keep going forward. I won't be around for that. But obviously, the building stock that we had 15 to 20 years ago, as Mehul articulated, is still moving through the system and providing great demand on that 70% of business of ours that is reroofing.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of David MacGregor from Longbow Research.
David S. MacGregor
Congratulations on the [indiscernible]. So many questions. We just get one shot. So I guess we got a picker spot. It's interesting you talked about demand remains resilient to pricing actions, but -- and I guess if reroof is truly an elastic demand, that's the way it should be. But you kind of believe at some point, there's some demand elasticity here. Maybe it's people parsing the size of the project due to their limited cost budgeting or there's something that comes into play there. This theoretical abstract that reroof being perfectly demanded elastic. How should we think about that? I mean if we see 2027, and we end up in kind of a inflationary macro environment where we continue to see inflation and where should we be watching for the first signs or what are you watching for the first signs that maybe there is some reaction by the market.
D. Koch
I don't think I don't think there's really anything on reroofing that I would point to. I do think we've already seen some pretty have the impacts and what I would call scenarios play out over the last 10 years. I think about COVID and what happened. And we had supply constraints. And we had -- everybody was going to work from home, and we were never going to build any more buildings downtown anymore and that kind of thing. And then we had the movement around energy efficiency, which is still there, but it was had maybe bigger impact, and there were going to be constraints in that manner because we know buildings eliminated a lot of GHG emissions.
And then we move into the tariff situation and election and tariffs impacted raw material supplies and it impacted demand, and we've seen Chinese manufacturing roll out here. We look at Europe and when we look at the presence of electric cars in Europe and things like that. And again, another major shock in terms of what's happening here with the conflicts, the global complex. And that's where, I guess, having been in the seat now almost 11 years. You run through these things and I am equally amazed as you are at the just strength and resiliency of the reroofing business. But I think it just points to the simple fact that it's not discretionary that it is -- we still continue to provide a lot of value around reroofing.
Like I said, our contractors and distributors spend a lot of time with these customers, making sure that their roofs are intact, they're there. And frankly, it's not a big cost or percentage of what a company was doing. Let's take a major international freight company that has buildings around the world and has a program for reroofing their warehouses that are storing packages every day at our airport, which are hundreds of airports where they're doing this.
I think in the grand scheme of things, they're more concerned about not having the cost or insurance liabilities of having a leaky roof than they really are worrying about the marginal cost of a roof. It doesn't mean they don't do on capital allocation, doesn't mean they're also not concerned about it. But in their spend, that is more of what I would just say a must-have than a, hey, it'd be nice to have.
And so I think on the reroofing side, I just don't see after I've been here for 11 years, much, it's going to come up, it's going to change that. And I think where you get the flex is around things like labor. We still are labor constrained, and so that's going to have an impact on -- even if there's a slowdown, you still have new construction work to do. And what does that impact I think new construction itself, if it picks up at all is good if it goes down, while we're already seeing it down. And then we always talk about residential construction being part of our portfolio. And I think we are absorbing that right now, what are we at a 14.5-year low on homebuilding or something. And so I think we've seen a lot of the things that you mentioned, and we still seem to be resilient and coming through it okay.
David S. MacGregor
Yes. Good. Well, congratulations on all the progress and particularly on the CWT side as well.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of [ Garik Shmois ] from D.A. Davidson.
Unknown Analyst
You're expecting EBITDA margin to be flat in the fourth quarter. I was hoping you could unpack that by segment. And then just a clarification. Can you remind us just how long the lag is from when you start to see any relief on MDI and polyols with some of the supplier constraints easing, how quickly could we start to see some of that potential benefit show up?
D. Koch
Yes. [ Derik ], I'll let Kevin handle the second one, but the first one, the second one around MDI and polyols Mehul may want to comment as well. I've been a little closer to the MDI. We are already -- we're going to see some reduction, probably a couple of percentage points, maybe a little bit more as we move through the fourth quarter and then into Q1 even in the situation we're in right now. So that specifically for MDI, I think that lifting of the force majeure and then it has really been impactful and we'll get some relief immediately here in the fourth quarter.
Some of the relief will be delayed until Q1, obviously, because of the -- just the movement, physical movement of it to our factories. And then Mehul, you've been looking at polyols a little bit more, you might want to have a comment on what you think is happening there in the quarter.
Mehul Patel
Yes. Similarly to MDI, the force majeure that limited supply, those are all improving. As a reminder, we had shortages of carbon monoxide and chlorine that impacted MDI. There was a fire at a supplier polyols. The supply is back up. And typically, what we've seen is 2/3 of the cost is driven by the supply demand dynamic. So we should expect to see improvement as we go into 2027 on both of these communities.
Kevin Zdimal
Then on your margin question, yes, we still are being impacted by the higher raw material and freight costs as we talk about second half of the fourth quarter, we should be at price [indiscernible], but we'll have some negative, maybe about $10 million of negative in both segments. And with that, that brings our EBITDA margins that we're looking at, at CCM is flat year-over-year and then about 100 basis points of improvement at CWT. And then overall, for the company, flat EBITDA margins when you take into account the corporate expense.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Merkel from William Blair.
Ryan Merkel
Fourth quarter gross margin, I was hoping you could provide a little color on what you think that might look like. I was kind of thinking flat year-over-year, but correct me if that's wrong. And then what's your estimate this year for raws and freight dollar inflation since it's higher?
Kevin Zdimal
For which period on the [ rosin ] freight, were you talking?
Ryan Merkel
[ Ross in freight ] for '26 at this point.
Kevin Zdimal
Yes. So for gross margins, they would be about flat at CCM and then we see improvement on the CWT side really to that [indiscernible] of about 100 basis points of improvement. Year-over-year on the [ raws ] and the freight, that's a freight that's just continued to escalate throughout the year. That's been the biggest item that we've had for increasing prices to pass along to catch up on the freight cost. That's been more of a delay than the raw material side, but both have been playing catch up on each of them.
Mehul Patel
Yes. And just to give you a sense, Ryan, in terms of the magnitude of the increases we're looking at from a raws and freight combined standpoint in Q2 were up about double digits from a percentage standpoint. In Q3, that's jumped up to high teens and with the Q4 levels that we're seeing assuming cost save, where they're at right now, we would expect somewhere between mid-teens and high teens up in Q4 as well.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Keith Hughes from Truist Securities.
Keith Hughes
You had talked earlier in the call about like the CCM, you're thinking price is going to be up around 7% in the fourth quarter. Just a couple of things on that. One, would it end the quarter at a faster pace as you implemented during the fourth and thinking about going into next year? And also that would imply volume would be based on the guidance of low single digits. Anything to read there on demand?
Kevin Zdimal
Yes. So on demand, we have the end market being up a couple of percent. And then as you said, price up 7%, so high single digits for the fourth quarter maybe there's some conservatism in there overall. So that is how we're looking at from the top line.
As the quarter goes on, I think that number of 7% pretty much is in place at in October, and then that just carries on through November, December. So it's not like we will exit December at 8% plus number. But it's hard to say exactly how the quarter will play out at this point?
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Adam Baumgarten from Vertical Research Partners.
Adam Baumgarten
Just to clarify on the price cost exiting the year. That assumes you get to the pricing number that you talked about in 4Q and that input stay stable from where they are today, correct? That does not include any incremental pricing?
D. Koch
That is accurate. We are just what we are seeing the price realization continue and it's continued [indiscernible] climb based on the raws of today and the price increases that are implemented. That doesn't include any actions -- further actions.
Operator
There are no further questions at this time. I'll hand the call over to Chris Koch for closing remarks. Please go ahead.
D. Koch
Thank you, Meghan, and thanks, everyone. We appreciate those thoughtful questions and your continued interest in Carlisle. I look forward to talking with you in February where we'll cover the fourth quarter and give the full results of 2026, along with more details on our expectations for the rest of '27 at that time. So that concludes the call, and thanks again.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
이 문서에는 사람이 검토한 AI 생성 콘텐츠 또는 AI 번역 콘텐츠가 포함될 수 있습니다. 이는 참고용 및 전반적인 정보를 제공용으로만 제공되며 투자 조언에 해당하지 않습니다.









코멘트 (0)
$ 버튼을 클릭하고, 종목 코드를 입력한 후 주식, ETF 또는 기타 티커를 연결합니다.