서비스퍼스트 뱅크셰어스(SFBS) 2026년 3분기 실적 발표회: 핵심 NIM 확대, EPS 증가

핵심 요약

• 서비스퍼스트 뱅크셰어스(ServisFirst Bancshares)는 2026년 3분기 순이익 8,730만 달러, 희석 주당순이익(EPS) 0.80달러를 기록해 2분기의 0.78달러 대비 2.6% 증가했다고 발표했습니다. EPS는 조정을 거친 전년 동기 수치인 0.65달러보다 23% 증가했습니다.
• 순이자이익은 전분기 대비 2.7%, 전년 동기 대비 약 20% 증가한 1억 5,980만 달러를 기록했습니다. 공시된 순이자마진(NIM)은 3.63%로 변동이 없었으나, 회사는 핵심 마진이 약 5bp(1bp=0.01%p) 확장되었다고 밝혔습니다.
• 대출 잔액은 147억 달러에 달해 2분기 대비 2억 5,900만 달러, 전년 동기 대비 14억 3,000만 달러(10.7%) 증가했습니다. 경영진은 상업공업(C&I) 대출 활동 호조와 90일 이내 시행 예정인 대출 파이프라인이 전분기 대비 58% 증가한 점을 강조했습니다.
• 대손충당금은 1억 8,900만 달러로 증가해 전체 대출의 1.28%를 차지했습니다. 무이채 대출(비수익성 대출)은 960만 달러 감소한 1억 6,180만 달러를 기록했으며, 순상각액은 총 770만 달러였습니다.
• 효율성 비율(Efficiency Ratio)은 30.20%로 낮은 수준을 유지했습니다. 경영진은 일회성 비용으로 인해 분기 지출이 약 200만 달러 증가했다고 추정하며, 정상화된 분기 지출 경상 수준(run rate)을 5,000만 달러에서 5,100만 달러로 제시했습니다.
• 경영진은 마진 확장이 계속될 것으로 기대하고 있으며, 휴스턴 지점 운영이 2027년 1분기 또는 2분기에 손익분기점에 도달할 수 있을 것으로 전망합니다. 휴스턴 사업부는 22명의 은행원과 2026년 잔여 기간 동안 약 2억 달러 규모의 대출 파이프라인을 보유하고 있었습니다.

주요 재무 데이터

주당 수치는 해당 분기 중 완료된 회사의 1 대 2 주식분할을 반영하여 조정되었습니다.

사업 및 영업 실적

예상치 못한 조기 상환과 실행 지연으로 인해 대출 성장은 2분기 대비 둔화되었습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 평균 대출 잔액은 3억 2,000만 달러(연율 8.9%) 증가했으며, 기말 잔액은 연율 7.1% 비율로 성장했습니다. 지난 1년간 C&I 대출은 15% 증가했고 투자용 부동산 대출은 약 16% 증가했습니다.

경영진은 단기 대출 활동이 개선되었다고 밝혔습니다. 90일 이내에 집행될 것으로 예상되는 파이프라인 비중이 전분기 대비 58% 증가했습니다. 휴스턴 지역은 상업용 부동산과 C&I 대출 간에 비교적 고르게 분포된 파이프라인을 계속 구축했습니다. 또한 경영진은 우수한 신용도와 가격 조건을 갖춘 신규 에너지 대출 기회도 언급했습니다.

조달 비용은 잘 관리되고 있습니다. 이자지급 예금의 평균 조달비용은 전분기와 동일한 2.80%를 유지했으며 전년 동기 대비 61bp 감소했습니다. 평균 이자지급 당좌예금 잔액은 평균 비용 1.58%로 약 3억 7,800만 달러 증가했습니다. 무이자 예금은 전년 동기 대비 12% 성장했습니다.

회사는 금리 경쟁으로 인해 일부 대형 지자체 예금의 이탈을 허용했습니다. 경영진은 4분기에 계절적 예금 성장이 더 강화될 것으로 예상하며 지역별 특화 예금 유치 방안을 추진 중이라고 말했습니다.

은행 소유 생명보험(BOLI) 수익은 전년 동기 대비 81% 증가한 430만 달러를 기록했습니다. 서비스퍼스트는 유리한 미국 재무부 유권해석에 따라 수익률 개선을 위해 약 4억 6,500만 달러 규모의 BOLI 자산 교환을 검토 중입니다. 경영진은 손실 인식이 수반되는 유가증권 재조정은 계획하고 있지 않다고 강조했습니다.

자본과 유동성은 견조한 상태를 유지했습니다. 잠정 보통주 자본비율(CET1)은 위험가중자산의 11.98%, 총위험기준자본비율은 13.26%였으며, 유형보통주자본 대비 유형자산 비율(TCE/TA)은 11.05%로 상승했습니다. 회사는 연방홈론은행(FHLB) 차입금이나 중개예금(brokered deposits) 없이 현금 및 현금성 자산 11억 9,000만 달러, 유가증권 15억 6,000만 달러로 3분기를 마감했습니다.

경영진 전망

경영진은 2026년 초보다는 속도가 둔화되겠지만 약 5~7bp의 추가 마진 확장에 대한 기대를 재확인했습니다. 평균 수익률 5.08%를 기록 중인 고정금리 대출 약 15억 달러가 향후 12개월 동안 금리 재조정(repricing)될 예정입니다. 3분기 신규 및 연장 대출의 평균 금리는 6.59%였으며, 대출 포트폴리오의 53%는 변동금리를 유지했습니다.

영업비용과 관련해 경영진은 정상화된 분기 경상 지출을 약 5,000만 달러에서 5,100만 달러로 예상했으며, 정상적인 환경에서는 효율성 비율이 30% 미만을 유지할 가능성이 높다고 밝혔습니다.

휴스턴 사업부의 초기 설립 손실은 향후 몇 분기에 걸쳐 감소할 것으로 예상됩니다. 경영진은 2026년 남은 기간 동안 약 2억 달러 규모의 파이프라인에 힘입어 2027년 1분기 또는 2분기에 손익분기점에 도달할 수 있을 것으로 보고 있습니다.

서비스퍼스트는 최대 200만 주 규모의 자사주 매입을 승인했습니다. 경영진은 자체 성장을 위한 자금 배분을 최우선 과제로 유지하면서 신중하게 자사주 매입을 집행할 것이라고 말했습니다.

리스크 및 주목할 점

• 대출 조기 상환이 불규칙하고 예측하기 어려워 3분기 대출 성장 둔화의 원인이 되었습니다.
• 무이채 대출 감소에도 불구하고 총 부실자산(NPA)은 소폭 증가했습니다.
• 3분기 상각액 중 700만 달러 이상은 8건의 대형 다가구 주택 여신 포트폴리오와 관련이 있습니다. 경영진은 질서 있는 청산 절차에 향후 2~4분기가 더 소요될 것으로 예상하고 있습니다.
• 특히 지자체 예금을 중심으로 예금 유치 경쟁이 치열하게 유지되고 있어 조달 성장이나 가격 책정에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
• 경영진은 금리가 실질적으로 추가 상승할 경우 높은 금리가 대출 수요를 감소시킬 수 있는지에 대한 불확실성을 인정했습니다.
• 휴스턴 사업부는 여전히 상당한 규모의 신규 투자 단계에 있으며 아직 손익분기점에 도달하지 못했습니다.

애널리스트 질의응답 하이라이트

애널리스트들은 마진 지속 가능성에 크게 주목했습니다. 경영진은 고정금리 대출의 금리 재조정, 변동금리 대출 포트폴리오, 규율 있는 예금 금리 책정을 추가 마진 확장의 주요 동인으로 꼽았습니다.

대출 조달과 관련해 경영진은 매력적인 대출 수요가 계속되는 한 예금 가용성이 대출을 제한하지는 않을 것이라고 밝혔습니다. 서비스퍼스트는 통상적인 4분기 계절성과 지역별 예금 추진책이 조달 성장을 뒷받침할 것으로 기대하고 있습니다.

신용 상태와 관련해 경영진은 분기 충당금 증가가 단일 손상자산 때문이 아닌 주로 포트폴리오 차원의 적립에 기인한 것이라고 설명했습니다. 대형 다가구 주택 포트폴리오는 질서 있는 매각 및 청산 절차를 지속 진행 중입니다.

자본 배치와 관련해 경영진은 자사주 매입보다 자체 확장이 우선한다는 점을 강조했습니다. 회사는 자사주 매입을 선별적으로 검토하는 한편, 동종 업계 내에서 우수한 자본력을 갖춘 은행 지위를 유지할 계획입니다.

실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 전문

전체 실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 녹취록

경영진 발표

Operator

Greetings. Welcome to the ServisFirst Bancshares Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.

I will now turn the conference over to Mr. Davis Mange, Treasurer. Thank you. You may begin.

Davis Mange

Good afternoon, and welcome to our third quarter earnings call. We'll have Tom Broughton, our CEO; Jim Harper, our Chief Credit Officer; and David Sparacio, our CFO, covering some highlights from the quarter, and then we'll take your questions. I'll now cover our forward-looking statements disclosure.

Some of the discussion in today's earnings call may include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ from any projections shared today due to factors described in our most recent 10-K and 10-Q filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. ServisFirst assumes no duty to update them.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Tom.

Thomas Broughton

Thank you, David. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our third quarter conference call. I'll give you a few quick highlights of the quarter followed by Jim Harper, our Chief Credit Officer; and David Sparacio, our Chief Financial Officer. On the loan side, while the growth in the loan book was lower than we would like. We think it was a combination of unexpected payoffs and loans not closing as expected during the quarter. We did see some low fixed rate loans pay off in the quarter, which is always good for our earnings per share. So that's a very much positive.

We did see some good growth in C&I loans in the third quarter, which is very positive and like seeing that. On the loan pipeline, I went back and looked at the pipeline 3 months ago, and it was very solid, and it was at record levels, but 40% of the total pipeline was over 90 days. So this quarter, the total pipeline, less than 90 days is up 58% over last quarter. So we think that is a good indicator of future closings over the next few months.

We do see the -- our Houston pipeline continues to build. We have a large -- we're talking about it as a large group of bankers out there. They're doing a great job and getting off to a good start. On the deposit side, we did allow some large municipal deposits to roll off in the quarter due to rate competition. And the rate competition is primarily coming from GC banks rather than original buying. So we couldn't compete at that rate and chose to not compete. We do have some deposit initiatives underway and expect good results in the fourth quarter.

We have emphasized noninterest-bearing deposits, and we have seen good growth year-over-year of 12% in noninterest-bearing deposits. So that's a positive for the bank. We did add 6 new bankers during the quarter, including 2 in Houston. We do have, as I mentioned, we have 22 bankers there now, and it's the largest start-up in our history even larger than when we started the Birmingham bank. So it's very much of a work in progress, but we're very optimistic about the future there. We do expect the start-up losses begin to decline over the next few quarters as they do have a solid loan and deposit pipeline.

So with that, I'll turn it over to Jim Harper for a credit update.

Jim Harper

Good afternoon. As Tom mentioned, third quarter loan growth was muted relative to second quarter 2026 performance as we ended the quarter with just over $14.7 billion in outstanding loans versus just under $14.5 billion of loans at 6/30 '26. However, those figures did represent loan growth year-to-date of over $1 billion and produced an annualized growth rate of 10%.

Anecdotally, loan activity does seem to have picked up in recent weeks. So early indications are that we're on pace to finish the year strong. On the top of payoffs, we did experience higher payoffs in the third quarter versus the second quarter. And while we do our best to handicap expected payoff activity on a forward-looking basis, given the uneven nature of payoffs over the course of this year and the current rate environment, it continues to be challenging to pin down a reliable estimate of payoff activity.

Turning to credit quality, while total nonperforming assets increased slightly on a quarter-over-quarter basis, nonaccrual loans decreased by approximately $9.6 million during the quarter to $161.8 million. The net decline in nonaccruals was driven by the successful resolution of 2 problem credits during the quarter as well as the movement of 2 loans into our OREO portfolio.

Lastly, I'll address net charge-offs and provision activity for the quarter. Charge-offs totaled $7.7 million for the third quarter and our $19.8 million year-to-date, equating to 21 basis points annualized. Regarding provisions, we increased our allowance for loan losses by approximately $7.2 million to $189 million as of the end of the quarter, and that allowance increased slightly to 1.28% of loans, which was up 2 basis points from June and covers our nonaccrual loans 118%, up from 107% last quarter.

David's up next with an overview of our quarterly financial performance.

David Sparacio

Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. Before I get into the numbers, a quick housekeeping note. We completed our 2-for-1 stock split during the quarter, so every per share figure that I referenced today, including prior periods, is adjusted for that split. The story of the third quarter is consistent with what we have been telling you all year. We continue to increase our revenue through asset growth and a wider margin while holding a best-in-class efficiency ratio and that combination continues to produce top quartile returns.

For the third quarter of 2026, we reported net income of $87.3 million or $0.80 per diluted share. That compares to $0.78 in the second quarter, up 2.6% on a linked-quarter basis. Last year's third quarter included a $7.8 million pretax loss on securities. Excluding that, adjusted diluted EPS from a year ago, $0.65. So on an adjusted basis, we grew earnings per share 23%.

For the first 9 months of 2026, net income was $256 million, up 28% from adjusted EPS of $1.84 in 2025. Freight provision net revenue was $120.7 million, up 1.8% from the second quarter and up 26% from an adjusted preprovision net revenue a year ago. Net interest income was $159.8 million, up $4.2 million or 2.7% from the second quarter and up $26.4 million or nearly 20% from a year ago. Net interest margin was 3.63%, unchanged from last quarter on a GAAP basis.

But as you'll recall, the second quarter included a recovery of interest income from a payoff on a nonaccrual relationship which added about 5 basis points to margin. Excluding that recovery, our margin expanded about 5 basis points this quarter, and it is up 54 basis points from 3.09% a year ago.

On the asset side, total loan yields were 6.24% compared to 6.23% last quarter. Investment yields were 3.85%, up from 3.82% last quarter and 3.60% a year ago. The securities portfolio was $1.56 billion at quarter end, down nearly $290 million from a year ago as we continue to deploy portfolio cash flows into loans.

As we have mentioned in the past, we continue to have low fixed rate loans repricing in the next 12 months. We currently have about $1.5 billion of loans with a weighted average yield of 5.08%. Plus we have a normal cash flow and covenant violation flow that allow us to gain yield in our wound portfolio. Additionally, we are restructuring some securities and other non-lending assets in the fourth quarter to improve the margin in future periods. So we expect to continue our margin expansion into 2027.

On the funding side, despite the increase in benchmark rates, our average cost of interest-bearing deposits was flat at 2.80% and is down 61 basis points from a year ago. We were also encouraged to see average interest-bearing checking balances grow by about $378 million in the quarter at a cost of 1.58%. Our average rate on federal funds purchased, which is primarily our correspondent banking funding was 3.78%, compared to 3.74% last quarter and 4.46% a year ago.

On noninterest income, we came in at $13.1 million for the quarter which was up from $12.9 million in the second quarter and up 23% from $10.6 million on an adjusted basis a year ago. Bank-owned life insurance income was the biggest driver at $4.3 million, up 81% year-over-year and 5% linked quarter, reflecting the policies we added over the past year.

Service charges on deposit accounts was $3.4 million, up 4% year-over-year and 3% linked quarter, and credit card income held steady at $2.4 million for the quarter. Noninterest expense was $52.2 million for the year, up 4.5% on a linked-quarter basis and 8.8% year-over-year or $4.2 million. Of this year-over-year increase, 40% of that is the full impact of the Houston market. The remaining expense increase of $2.4 million is composed of mostly nonrecurring expenses experienced during the quarter.

This expense growth rate is a fraction of our revenue growth, which grew 20% year-over-year. Our efficiency ratio is 30.20% compared to 29.65% last quarter and 35.22% a year ago or 33.31% adjustment. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 17.20% compared to 19.94% last quarter and 16.81% a year ago. The linked quarter decline reflects investment tax credits we purchased during the quarter. These continue to give us a meaningful benefit, and we will keep evaluating similar opportunities.

Turning to the balance sheet. As Jim mentioned, our ending loans were $14.7 billion, up $259 million from the second quarter or 7.1% annualized, and up $1.43 billion or 10.7% from a year ago. Average loans grew $320 million or 8.9% annualized.

Over the past year, growth has been balanced between C&I loans up 15% and investor real estate up about 16%. Capital continued to build. Stockholders' equity passed $2 billion for the first time at $2.04 billion. Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets was 11.98% on a preliminary basis, up 49 basis points from 11.49% a year ago. Total risk-based capital was 13.26%. Our Tier 1 leverage ratio was 11.1% and tangible common equity to tangible assets rose to 11.05%, up 33 basis points on a linked quarter and nearly 100 basis points year-over-year.

Tangible book value per share was $18.51, up 14.4% year-over-year. On liquidity, we ended the quarter with $1.19 billion in cash and cash equivalents along with $1.56 billion in securities. We continue to have no FHLB advances and no broker deposits. Our funding remains core and relationship driven.

To sum up the third quarter, earnings per share grew 33% year-over-year. Our core margin expanded again, loans grew more than 10%. Our efficiency ratio stayed around 30%. Credit metrics improved and book value per share is up 14%. We are generating capital faster than we were using it, which gives us real flexibility as we head into the fourth quarter. And with our newly approved share repurchase plan, we expect to deploy some of that excess capital in a value-added way.

With that, we will now take your questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Stephen Scouten of Piper Sandler.

질의응답

Stephen Scouten

Maybe if I could start on the margin. I know, David, you said it feels like you have additional upside into '27 and it looks like the margin was maybe 3.68% in the final month, so up another 5 basis points. Just kind of wondering magnitude change if you still think we're kind of in this 4 to 5 bps a quarter range or if it was the potential for another December hike, if any of that math changes would you guys being slightly liability sensitive and kind of any underlying assumptions within that would be great.

David Sparacio

Yes. No, Stephen. This is David. And I still expect it in the 5 to 7 basis point increase range. I mentioned it, we still have about $1.5 billion of fixed rate, low fixed rate loans, repricing. The average rate on those is about 5.08%. Our going on rate or the average rate for renewals and new loans was 6.59% in the quarter. So we still have some room to grow there. The more important piece of it, I think, is deposit costs, we were able to be selective on deposit costs as the Fed raise rates this quarter. And so we were able to tap down any increases in our deposit costs, and we expect to do the same thing for any future hikes.

Tom mentioned in his comments about the expense of municipal deposits that we walk away because we were being outdated by a GSIB. And so it's going to be an opportunistic pricing on deposits, and it's going to be disciplined on the asset side as we get those repricing opportunities in front of us. And so yes, I don't expect anything. I mean we still -- 53% of our loan book is variable rate.

And so we're going to have some upside potential in existing variable rate loans as well. that get a higher yield as well as the Fed is raising rates. So I mean, you throw all that in, and we still have room for expansion. It's just going to be at a slower pace than what we saw earlier in this year. But the point is, it's still expansion at the end of the day.

Stephen Scouten

Okay. That's really helpful. And then it sounds like the pipelines are building loan demand is good. I guess Houston is still in relatively early stages. So if we have like continued strong loan growth, how much of an impediment is the loan-to-deposit ratio where it sits today? And could deposit growth be a constraint on loan growth if it can't match the robust loan growth you guys have been delivering?

Thomas Broughton

Given a choice, this is Tom, before, Steve. Given a choice, we always prefer to need deposits for the need loans because we can find the deposits. But you can't just go find the loans, as you well know, is they just don't -- you've got to have the loan demand. And so given if we can have the loan demand, and we'll come up with ways to match off with deposits. So -- and this is typically the time of the year we have really good deposit growth in the fourth quarter. So we anticipate that again, and our deposit pipeline is good. So we're optimistic on that front. We've always found a way to grow deposits.

Stephen Scouten

Yes. No, that's fair. And I think, Tom, you mentioned some deposit initiatives underway. Anything specific there that you can comment on, just give us an idea of where you might look to drive deposit growth here?

Thomas Broughton

No. Well, we do it individually by region and each region has our own unique goals and ways to grow deposits. So that is something we work all 12 regions on -- 13, including correspondent. So we feel like we have some good initiatives underway. And you got to go to where you find deposits, first of all. Where is the money?

Operator

Our next question is from David Bishop of the Hovde Group.

David Bishop

Yes. There's a preamble. It sounded like Tom or David mentioned that maybe you're contemplating some restructurings, either in the securities portfolio or not earning assets, maybe what you're thinking along the lines there and how large this could be as a percent of the portfolio?

David Sparacio

Yes. Absolutely, David. This is David again. We did -- you'll notice in the financials, we had a small securities gain. We had some treasuries that were maturing in the fourth quarter. And just in light of the interest rate environment and what was available in the third quarter, we decided to accelerate those and swap those out. And so we did that in the third quarter. We'll continue. We've got some smaller subsets of securities that are maturing in the fourth quarter. So we'll be opportunistic on those as well.

But the big thing is, in July, the treasury had a ruling on exchanges on bank-owned life insurance on BOLI. And so we have about $465 million in assets in BOLI. That's -- we have some pretty low yields on policies that were put on the books in 2011, 2012, 2013. And so we have an opportunity now with that favorable ruling from the treasury to structure a deal where we can improve those yields and do some swap outs on those. So that's the part that we're looking at as we move into the fourth quarter.

Thomas Broughton

We're not contemplating any restructuring where we take security losses. David?

David Bishop

More of a function of better yield on the BOLI policies, is that correct?

David Sparacio

That is correct. Yes.

David Bishop

Got it. Got it. And then I think, David, you mentioned there were some noise in operating expenses this quarter probably looks like other expenses that were not recurring -- any way to size it up from a dollar perspective and perhaps what those pertain to?

David Sparacio

Yes, David, I mean, I would focus on the efficiency ratio, right? I mean we ticked up above 30% this quarter when we had been sub 30% for a couple of quarters. In a normalized environment, I would say we would stay below 30%. We were probably about $2 million over our expense run rate that I would expect due to those onetime nonrecurring costs. And so if you model that out, I think that gets you somewhere around $50 million, $51 million a quarter is what I expect our run rate to be.

Thomas Broughton

So it was just a catch all, David, just a bunch of stuff. I mean we had -- we repeat going to be for sale for soon, interested. We never own the yacht, but it will be our first one. So we have some expenses to get the yacht back in the states and get it operational. It's a fairly expensive proposition. So -- but any we had some other ORE type expenses and some NPA expenses. So we just went ahead and took all those and expensed everything rather than capitalizing them, David.

Operator

Our next question is from Steve Moss of Raymond James.

Stephen Moss

When we were talking a couple of weeks ago, spreads were pretty tight here for new loans -- just kind of curious, have you seen spreads improve enough to be more optimistic on lending? Or just kind of curious on your thoughts in terms of loan pricing here going forward?

Thomas Broughton

That's a really good question. And when I talk to other bankers, which we talk to other bankers all the time, absolutely, we have 400 correspondent banks. And our people doing being more -- our competitors be more rational. And I think I would say definitely, yes, on the -- because when customers ask us for a fixed rate loan quote, I think it blows them back a little bit when we tell them, okay, here's the curve today, and here's your 5-year rate, and they don't like that. They immediately would opt today for a floating rate.

So -- and I think other banks are doing the same thing. So we're seeing a lot less. That's the good part of higher rates is I think you get a little bit rationalized a little bit better competition than we saw. And I don't know, Rodney, do you think?

Rodney Rushing

Yes. It's market reach in the region, market to market, but I think here in Birmingham, we had a number of new banks come into our market 2, 3, 4 years ago that we're doing some irrational things, and that seems to have gone by the wayside for the last 6 months, certainly here in Birmingham.

Thomas Broughton

Yes. I think that's true. So I think there is an upside to higher interest rates, Steve. Of course, will there be demand destruction? Who knows the answer to that question. I think rates were already high enough that it made a lot of projects uneconomical to start. So I don't think it's another 25 or 50 basis points. Now another 100 basis points will be another a whole another matter, right? So I'm optimistic that we'll see continued a little bit more rational competition out there than what we've seen over the last 6 months.

I mean you shouldn't be having an intense loan, the deposit competition at exactly the same time, should you? That seems highly irrational, but that's what we've seen to an extent. So people may be they're going to figure it out. They don't compete on deposits, they need to have higher loan yields. And that's what I tell our people internally, is okay, if you got to pay up for deposits you're going to have to charge more for loans in your region, so that we have an adequate margin within each region.

Stephen Moss

Right. No, I hear you there. Okay. And then maybe just kind of thinking about -- just on to credit here with regard to the reserve about 2 basis points quarter-over-quarter. Just kind of curious, was there -- were there any specific reserves for some credits this quarter that maybe drove that reserve higher? And any update you can provide on the roughly $100 million relationship?

Thomas Broughton

So with regard to specific credits that may have moved the needle over the quarter, quite frankly, we had one notable credit action that was unexpected that we had to address, but even it didn't come close to a basis point of movement. So it was actually across the board and more portfolio based than it was specifically impaired assets.

Stephen Moss

Okay, got it. And in terms of the large credit, just any update you guys have there?

Thomas Broughton

Large credits. Yes. Yes, we took a charge. Just over $7 million this quarter that represents the first true charge-off we've taken with respect to that portfolio of large multifamily properties. We're continuing to work through an orderly liquidation process with those 8 credits and are working with a broker to identify potential sales opportunities to get those marketed and liquidated. And so, so far, so good. We'll hope to kind of execute this in an orderly fashion over the next 2 to 4 quarters.

Stephen Moss

Okay. Got you. And then on the share repurchase announcement here for 2 million shares, curious on your appetite to repurchase shares and just kind of how you're thinking about buy back stock?

Thomas Broughton

That's a real good question, Steve. Once you execute, it's done, right? I mean, you can't -- we can't remarket those shares. We can't -- I'm sure we can figure out how to remarket those shares. But once we repurchase and spend the money, so we're going to be -- we've never done this before. we're going to be very careful about how we do it and when we do it.

And I'm not sure that as insiders, I'm not sure we know we have a present value analysis, but I'm not sure we all know exactly what the future holds and what bank stock prices will do over the next year. But any you meant we're going to be reasonably cautious would be my answer to you, Steve, we try to make good decisions for the shareholders.

Stephen Moss

Maybe put it this way, given where the loan pipeline is and just the economic activity you're seeing in all your markets in Texas expansion, are you just a little more hesitant to deploy that capital near term, combined with moving rates? Or to buy back stock near-term lease?

Thomas Broughton

Yes, given not from a liquidity standpoint, but just from a capital standpoint, we want to make it sure that we always have adequate capital to be able to fund our growth. And that's clearly the number #1 goal. And clearly, it's the #1 thing to send the shareholders' best interest to create value. Anything we could do to create value involves expansion, right, organic growth. So you're absolutely right. We've got to keep that as our main focus all the time.

David Sparacio

Thank you, everybody. Thank you for your questions and...

Operator

We do have one question left. Our next question is from David Bishop of the Hovde Group.

David Bishop

Sorry to keep you a little longer, Tom, but staying on that topic of expansion. Just curious in terms of maybe an update in terms of the dollar volume of maybe outstandings in Texas in terms of loans and deposits? And maybe what you're seeing in terms of pricing in that state relative to some of your other regions?

Thomas Broughton

Yes. We found that the pricing is stronger in Texas than we've seen the credits the loans and deposits are larger. Everything is bigger in Texas. As I say, we're optimistic that they'll continue to you lead with credit, the deposits follow, but they are certainly focused on generating net deposit relationships as well as lending relationship. So we expect -- they probably have $200 million in the pipeline for the remainder of the year, and I would anticipate them trying to get to breakeven by the first or second quarter of next year in terms of the fairly sizable overhead that we have.

And so we're optimistic. There's a lot of -- there's a lot of stuff in the hopper. They're doing a great job. The team is doing a great job of making contact and seeing prospects. And I think with all the mergers in the market out there. I think that's -- certainly makes it a target-rich environment for a good, stable, growing bank. So we're optimistic on that front, Dave.

David Bishop

I'm curious, you've noted the good C&I growth this quarter. And I think the bankers should be hired out of Woodforest were mostly C&I. Is Texas driving the bulk of the C&I growth you're seeing lately? Or is that out across the broader footprint of the company?

David Sparacio

Interestingly, I'd say that they've originated more real estate activity than they ever would have imagined so far. So actually been pretty evenly split out of Texas so far from real estate and C&I. So we have some C&I growth in other regions to over the quarter, which was good to see.

Thomas Broughton

The first thing they run across were commercial real estate opportunities because you talk to developers say, I've got a knee immediate need, and that's the thing that you that's why bankers like to book CRE deals because they're more immediate, right? So C&I takes longer, takes a good bit longer, but we do see a lot of C&I opportunities coming our way, including some energy credits with that are strong credits with very good pricing on them.

David Bishop

Got it. Appreciate that color. And I guess my final question, Tom, just circling back to the share repurchase level. just curious or remind us, are there any sort of enumerated targeted capital levels that lets you sleep better at night, that sort of factor into that decision?

Thomas Broughton

I think we -- the thought was that we could -- unless we see extraordinary organic growth opportunities we can, over time, maybe repurchase some stock in our capital not decline as a percent of assets or CT1. So we feel confident we can do both. And don't want to certainly -- we want to be in the top tier of capitalized banks, well-capitalized banks, and we are, and we want to stay that way. So that's -- we think that contributes to our position as one of the more recognized banks in our peer group. Thank you. Well, thank you, everybody, for joining us today. Have a good evening.

Operator

Thank you. That concludes our question-and-answer and our call. You may disconnect your lines at this time.