프리퀀시 일렉트로닉스(FEIM) 2027 회계연도 1분기 실적 발표회: 사상 최대 매출 및 수주 잔고

핵심 요약

• 프리퀀시 일렉트로닉스(Frequency Electronics)는 2027 회계연도 1분기 매출이 전년 동기 대비 70%, 전분기 대비 52% 증가한 2,350만 달러로 분기 기준 역대 최대치를 기록했다고 발표했다.
• 매출총이익률은 45.8%에 달했으며, 영업이익률은 22%로 상승했다. 영업이익은 전년 동기 36만 4,000달러에서 520만 달러로 증가했다.
• 순이익은 전년 동기 63만 4,000달러(주당 0.07달러) 대비 약 420만 달러(주당 0.41달러)를 기록했다.
• 확정 수주잔고는 전년 동기 대비 약 82%, 전분기 대비 16% 증가한 1억 2,900만 달러로 사상 최고치를 경신했다. 전체 잔고의 약 65%가 12개월 이내에 매출로 인식될 예정이며, 분기 수주출하비율(Book-to-bill)은 약 1.76:1을 기록했다.
• 경영진은 2029 회계연도까지 연간 매출 최소 1억 5,000만 달러, 매출총이익률 50%, 영업이익률 30%라는 최소 목표를 재확인했다. 또한 생산능력 확충을 통해 매출 목표를 조기 달성하거나 늘릴 수도 있다고 덧붙였다.
• FEIM은 초과배정옵션 행사에 따라 분기 종료 후 수령한 약 1,400만 달러를 포함해 주식 유상증자를 통해 약 7,300만 달러를 조달했다. 회사는 무부채 상태를 유지하고 있다.

주요 재무 데이터

사업 및 영업 실적

상업용 및 미국 정부 통신위성 매출은 1,180만 달러로 연결 매출의 약 50%를 차지했다. 이는 이전의 650만 달러에서 늘어난 수치로, 전년 동기 대비 80% 이상 증가했다.

비우주 분야 미국 국방부 고객 관련 매출은 연결 매출의 약 47%인 1,110만 달러를 기록해 기존 690만 달러에서 증가했다. 기타 상업 및 산업용 매출은 전년 동기 43만 9,000달러에서 증가한 60만 5,000달러를 기록했다.

경영진은 매출총이익률 개선의 원인으로 생산량 증가, 인건비 및 제조간접비 효율화, 제품 믹스 개선, 프로그램 성숙 등을 꼽았다. 판매관리비는 주로 보상 비용 증가로 인해 50만 달러 늘어났으나, 매출 대비 비중은 26%에서 약 18%로 감소해 영업 레버리지 효과를 보여주었다.

성장 우선순위 분야로는 전통적 위성 및 군집(proliferated) 위성, 미사일 방어 시스템, 보안 군사 통신, 대체 위치·항법·시각(PNT) 시스템, 양자 감지, 우주 탐사 등이 포함된다.

FEIM의 디지털 루비듐 원자 주파수 표준기(Digital Rubidium Atomic Frequency Standard)는 4월 21일에 발사된 마지막 GPS III 위성에서 작동 중이다. 해당 원자시계는 다른 글로벌 위성 항법 시스템용으로도 주문받았으며, 향후 GPS IIIF 위성 적용을 목표로 하고 있다.

회사는 2027년 및 그 이후에도 패트리어트(Patriot) 및 사드(THAAD) 포대 프로그램에서 매출이 발생할 것으로 기대하고 있다. 또한 기존 공급업체를 대체할 기회를 포함해 미사일에 직접 탑재되는 부품 수주를 위한 입찰도 진행 중이다.

보안 군사 통신 계약 건은 1,000개 이상의 시스템을 포함한다. 고객사는 월 생산량을 50% 이상 늘려줄 것을 요청했으며 후속 주문 가능성도 시사했다.

FEIM은 유인 항공기용 양산형 TURbO 유닛을 소량 인도하기 시작했다. 또한 드론 적용 방안을 논의 중이며, 우주 공간에서의 사용 가능성에 대비해 방사선 경화(radiation-hardening) 작업을 시작하고 있다.

경영진 가이던스

경영진은 2029년 4월 30일 종료되는 2029 회계연도까지 연간 매출 최소 1억 5,000만 달러 달성 목표를 유지했다. 또한 2029 회계연도의 매출총이익률 50% 및 영업이익률 30%라는 최소 목표를 재확인했다.

회사 측은 분기별 매출 및 수익성 진전이 선형적으로 나타나지는 않을 것이라고 주의를 당부했다. 다만 경영진은 매출 추세, 사상 최대 수주잔고, 판매 파이프라인, 영업 레버리지가 장기 목표를 뒷받침한다고 언급했다.

약 7,300만 달러 규모의 주식 발행 공모 자금은 생산량 증대 및 증산 속도 향상을 요청한 고객 수요에 대응하기 위한 생산능력 확충에 사용될 예정이다. 경영진은 이번 투자로 FEIM이 1억 5,000만 달러 기준선을 더 빨리 달성하고 2029 회계연도 매출 수준을 한층 크게 끌어올릴 수 있을 것이라고 밝혔다.

예상되는 확충은 주로 자체적인(organic) 성장을 통해 이루어질 예정이다. 인수는 수직적 제조 역량을 지원하는 소규모 터크인(tuck-in) 거래에 그칠 가능성이 높다. 또한 경영진은 FEIM이 향후 연간 기준으로 잉여현금흐름을 창출할 것으로 예상하며, 분기별 변동은 있겠지만 자체 자금 조달 R&D 비중을 매출의 10% 미만으로 유지할 계획이다.

리스크 및 주시해야 할 사항

생산능력이 주요 제약 요인이다. 경영진은 생산 증대(ramp)를 FEIM의 가장 큰 과제 중 하나로 꼽았으며, 납기 약속을 지키기 위해 비현실적이라고 판단되는 고객의 일정 요구는 거절할 수도 있다고 밝혔다.

생산능력 증설을 위해서는 처리량이 더 높은 수정 진동자(quartz crystal) 제조 장비와 우주 제품용 열진공(thermal-vacuum) 시스템 등 보다 전문화된 시험 인프라가 필요하다.

마진은 제품 믹스와 프로그램 성숙도에 따라 변동될 수 있다. FEIM은 군집 위성 프로그램의 초기 단계 동안 다소 낮은 마진을 수용할 수도 있지만, 경영진은 현재 심각한 마진 압박은 관측되지 않는다고 말했다.

일부 신규 기회는 아직 초기 단계에 머물러 있다. 군집형 기밀 위성 프로그램은 시연 단계에서 초기 생산 단계로 이동 중이며, 우주 데이터센터의 잠재적 수요는 아직 가시화되지 않았다. 우주 분야 외 국방 기술 고객 침투율 역시 여전히 제한적인 수준이다.

애널리스트 Q&A 주요 내용

• 수주잔고 가시성: 1억 2,900만 달러 규모의 확정 수주잔고 중 약 65%가 12개월 이내에 집행될 것으로 예상된다. 경영진은 가시적인 계약 건 중 미확정 금액이 보고된 확정 금액의 수 배에 달하지만, FEIM은 확정된 주문만을 수주잔고로 인식한다고 언급했다.
• 군집 위성: 경영진은 기밀 위성 아키텍처가 군집 시스템으로 빠르게 전환되고 있다고 밝혔다. FEIM은 시연에서 초기 생산 단계로 넘어가고 있으며 점차 더 많은 프로그램에 참여하고 있다.
• 미사일 방어: 패트리어트 및 사드 수요는 상당한 것으로 평가되었다. FEIM은 현재 미사일 포대에 부품을 공급하고 있으며, 미사일에 직접 탑재되는 부품 기회도 모색하고 있다.
• 제조 자동화: FEIM은 특히 수직 계열화된 수정 진동자 생산을 위한 고처리량 장비와 추가 열진공 시험 용량을 검토하고 있다.
• R&D 전략: 회사는 미국 정부 응용 분야와 연계된 외부 자금 지원 연구를 극대화하는 것을 목표로 하고 있다. 매출 성장에 따라 절대적 지출액은 늘어날 수 있으나, 자체 자금 조달 R&D 비중은 매출의 10% 미만을 유지할 것으로 예상된다.
• 자본 환원: 경영진은 소규모 현금 배당을 지속적으로 검토 중이지만 확약된 사항은 없다고 밝혔다.

실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 전문

전체 실적 발표 컨퍼런스 콜 녹취록

경영진 발표

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Frequency Electronics First Quarter Fiscal 2027 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

Any statements made by the company during this conference call regarding the future constitute forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements inherently involve uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences are included in the company's press releases and are further detailed in the company's periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By making these forward-looking statements, the company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this conference call.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Thomas McClelland, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thomas McClelland

Thank you, Paul. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Frequency Electronics First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 Earnings Call. With me today is our Chief Financial Officer, Steve Bernstein.

I'm very pleased to report first quarter revenue of $23.5 million, an all-time record for FEI, up 70% year-over-year and up 52% sequentially. As we told you on our fourth quarter 2026 earnings call in July, we expected to return to growth starting in the current fiscal 2027, and this first quarter is a strong proof point of that. Further, this performance gives us increasing confidence in our ability to meet or exceed the $150 million or more in annual revenue that we guided to by fiscal 2029, which ends April 30, 2029. I'll have more to say about that target shortly.

Steve will provide additional financial commentary later in the call, but I'd like to highlight a few items. On our July call, we established 3-year minimum margin targets of 50% for gross margin and 30% for operating margin, again, by fiscal 2029. In the fiscal first quarter we're reporting today, we generated gross margin of 45.8% and operating margin of 22%, substantial improvements and solid progress on our path towards our minimum targets.

As I've mentioned numerous times over the past few years, we do not expect our progress to be perfectly linear on a quarterly basis, whether in revenue or profitability. But the trends we see in revenue, backlog and pipeline as well as the internal improvements we've made that we discussed last quarter and the operating leverage we should generate with increasing revenue position us well to meet or exceed those minimum targets.

As for backlog, it grew to a new record of $129 million, up approximately 82% year-over-year and 16% sequentially. This continued increase in backlog gives further support to our ability to add meaningful growth to FEI in the years to come.

As we've discussed before, we expect continued growth in our core space and defense markets while also seeing additional growth coming from new markets such as space defense, proliferated satellites, quantum sensing, space exploration and alternative position, navigation and timing. Today, I'd like to provide some additional color on several of these markets, all of which build upon our core timing and frequency generation capabilities.

So I'm sure you're all familiar with GPS satellites, part of the traditional space business we have sold into. On April 21 of this year, the final GPS III satellite was launched, which included FEI's newly developed Digital Rubidium Atomic Frequency Standard, or DRAFS, atomic clock. This enhanced DRAFS clock is currently operational on the GPS satellite, is on order for use on other global navigation satellite systems and is targeted at future GPS satellites, including the upcoming GPS IIIF, or follow-on, launches. This advanced atomic clock is an example of the company's important capabilities, not just to provide the precision time and frequency devices that we've been delivering for the last 65 years, but also our capability to deliver state-of-the-art products with capabilities fueling future technological innovations.

You've no doubt seen the news flow over the past several months about the critical need for missile replenishment with government plans to significantly expand production by 2030. And we've spoken with you before about our content that goes into missile batteries for programs such as Patriot and THAAD. We expect to generate revenue from those programs in 2027 and for years beyond that coming from existing orders, more orders to come and additional orders to meet the needs of allied countries.

In addition to this missile battery-related work, we're also now bidding on additional missile programs with components that go directly onto the missiles themselves. In some cases, we're being asked to bid on these -- on missile programs in order to potentially displace incumbents.

There is a secured communication program for the military that we're producing that is a good example of both the higher rate production programs we have spoken about and the push by our customers to deliver more sooner. In this case, we're working on a production contract for over 1,000 systems. In addition, the customer on this program is now asking us to increase monthly production by more than 50% while also promising additional follow-on orders. In other words, we're expanding the total size of an already high-rate production program.

For another example of our ability to use internally developed technology for expanded use cases, we're currently exploring potential uses of our mercury ion atomic clock for naval applications. Strategic submarines are a potential use case for advanced atomic clocks because they need to be underwater for months at a time and their timing cannot be updated from GPS satellites while they're underwater. So they'll need a different technology for certain use cases that require very highly accurate timing and our advanced mercury ion clocks may be the solution. We believe this is also a good example of our ability to participate in long-term programs for higher-priced systems and to do so with external funding.

In quantum sensing, we're making rapid progress in the development of advanced sensors for magnetic navigation in GPS-denied environments. We just recently delivered a sensor and associated electronics to the Army Research Laboratory for additional testing. Development is ongoing at FEI to make smaller, more capable magnetic sensing systems for alt-PNT applications.

Finally, I'd like to discuss the capital raise that we completed right at the end of the first quarter and how that may impact our long-term guidance. We've told you previously that we have sufficient capital in place to meet the minimum $150 million revenue target by fiscal 2029. Numerous customers, however, are asking us to do more for them and to do it more quickly.

To meet this customer-driven business expansion, we decided to pursue a secondary offering of our common stock in July, which raised approximately $73 million and also brought several excellent long-term oriented new institutional investors into our shareholder base. Approximately $14 million of the total came in after the quarter ended as the greenshoe was exercised.

We remain debt-free with a very strong cash position, and we anticipate being a free cash flow generative on an annual basis going forward. We would like to thank Morgan Stanley, our lead bankers on the transaction, and Craig-Hallum, who served as book-running managers, for their hard work on this successful transaction.

The capital we raised will allow us to pursue capacity expansion to help meet these additional customer requests, which may have the effect of our both reaching the $150 million minimum target sooner and making that target a substantially larger number by fiscal 2029. We also expect that some of our customers will pay for capacity expansion in certain cases.

We expect this additional revenue growth that derives from capacity expansion to be organic, and it is likely that if we were to make any acquisitions, they would be small tuck-ins to add to our vertical manufacturing capabilities. In other words, we do not intend to buy revenue, frankly, because we don't need to, given the strength of our backlog, pipeline, order book and prospects. There's an exceptional amount of growth and value creation to be gained by focusing on what is in front of us without getting distracted by a larger acquisition. We should be able to super-serve our customers with this extra capital, resulting in additional profitable growth that should benefit our shareholders as well.

With that, I'll turn it over to Steve for some financial commentary, and I look forward to taking your questions in the Q&A portion of the call. Steve?

Steven Bernstein

Thank you, Tom, and good afternoon. As Tom highlighted, it's a great start to our fiscal '27 and a strong start to achieving our 3-year targets. For the 3 months ended July 31, '26, revenue from commercial and U.S. government communication satellite programs was $11.8 million and accounted for approximately 50% of consolidated revenue compared to $6.5 million and approximately 47% of consolidated revenue during the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Revenue is recognized primarily over time under the percentage of completion method. Revenue from the satellite market are recorded in the FEI-New York segment. Revenue from non-space U.S. government Department of Defense customers, which are recorded in both the FEI-New York and FEI-Zyfer segments were $11.1 million and accounted for approximately 47% of consolidated revenue for the 3 months ended July 31, '26, compared to $6.9 million and approximately 50% of consolidated revenue during the same period in the prior fiscal year. Other commercial and industrial revenue for the 3 months ended July 31, '26 and '25 accounted for approximately 3% of consolidated revenue and were $605,000 and $439,000, respectively.

The revenue for the 3 months ending July 31, '26 was significantly higher in both segments and in consolidation by approximately 70% or $9.6 million over the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. Revenue from commercial and U.S. government communication satellite programs increased $5.2 million and over 80% and revenue from non-space U.S. government Department of Defense customers increased $4.2 million and over 61% over the same period in the prior fiscal year.

For the 3 months ended July 31, '26, both gross margin and gross margin rate increased compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross margin is attributable to the $9.6 million increase in revenue compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The 9% improvement in gross margin rate is attributable to higher production levels driving efficiencies in labor, overhead allocation, product mix and also partially due to efficiencies recognized as programs mature.

For the 3 months ended July 31, '26 and '25, selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately 18% and 26%, respectively, of consolidated revenues, a decrease of approximately 8%. However, the actual expenditures increased by $0.5 million. The increase in SG&A expenses during the 3 months ending July 31, '26 related mostly to compensation expenses. SG&A as a percentage of revenue decreased 8% over the same period in the prior fiscal year, demonstrating positive operating leverage given the higher revenue base and because the prior year included strategic headcount additions and process optimizations that were implemented to support growth in fiscal '27 and beyond, which caused SG&A as a percentage of revenue to be higher in fiscal '26.

Research and development expenditures represent investments intended to keep the company's products at the leading edge of time and frequency technology and enhance future competitiveness. Fluctuations in R&D expenditures will occur in some periods due to current operational needs supporting ongoing programs. The company plans to continue to invest in R&D in the future to keep its products at the state-of-the-art.

For the 3 months ending July 31, '26, operating income was $5.2 million or 22% of revenue and increased significantly compared to the prior fiscal year period's $364,000 operating income due to the higher revenue, gross margin and operational efficiencies as described above. The majority of the approximately $0.1 million of investment income for the 3 months ended July 31, '26 was from interest income and unrealized gains on assets held in the Frequency Electronics deferred compensation trust. This yields a pretax income of approximately $5.2 million for the 3 months ending July 31, '26, compared to approximately $557,000 pretax income for the 3 months ending July 31, '25.

Consolidated net income for the 3 months ending July 31, '26 was approximately $4.2 million or $0.41 per share compared to $634,000 or $0.07 per share for the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Our fully-funding backlog at the end of July was approximately $129 million, a new company high compared to approximately $111 million for the previous fiscal year ending April 30, '26 and compared to approximately $71 million in the year ago period.

The company's balance sheet continues to reflect a strong working capital position of approximately $90 million and a current ratio of approximately 5.3:1, helped by the company's stock offering, which increased further following the exercise of the greenshoe after the quarter ended. Additionally, the company is debt-free. The company believes that its liquidity is adequate to meet its operating and investing needs for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future.

I'll turn the call back to Tom, and we look forward to your questions.

Thomas McClelland

Thanks, Steve. We're now ready to take questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The first question today will be from Jeff Van Rhee from Craig-Hallum.

질의응답

Jeff Van Rhee

Congrats across the board. It just looks like a fantastic quarter here. Maybe a few for me. The -- Tom, maybe touch on TURbO. I know obviously, interesting form factor, a lot of useful applications. Can you just give us a little update in terms of what you're seeing there, in particular, from the new bookings side, strength of bookings, any quantification of where revenue is going, maybe insights into the use cases, just how it's being deployed? Just sort of a broader update on TURbO would be great.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. Yes. Sure, Jeff. We're just starting to -- beginning to deliver production-grade TURbO units at this point in time, relatively small quantities still, but we anticipate things will be picking up in the near future. We -- currently, the applications are all aircraft applications, manned aircraft applications, although we have discussions with some companies regarding drone applications, which is one of the areas that we're most excited about. We are also starting some initial efforts in terms of updating the development of the TURbO units for use in space, primarily that involves radiation hardening of those devices.

Jeff Van Rhee

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just a couple of quick on the numbers front, Steve. The percent of the backlog that's 12 months? And then also, if you could, just any color around funded. I know you only report in total backlog, the portion that's funded. I'm wondering how the ratio of funded to total has changed maybe compared to, say, a-year-ago quarter?

Steven Bernstein

Well, I'll answer the first question. Well, the reported backlog is fully funded. So that is fully funded. We don't report the non-funded part, the options or things. Tom has explained numerous times, like we get a contract just for like $10 million, maybe 10% or 20% of it is funded. So only $1 million or $2 million would go into backlog. We don't report that other $8 million or $9 million until it becomes funded.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. No, understood. What I'm asking is you've got visibility to what the rest of that backlog is, but you're only reporting funding. I'm asking the ratio of what's visible to total and how it's changed? And then the second part of the question is what portion is the next 12 months?

Steven Bernstein

Well, I think it's multiple times of it going -- the unfunded portion of it. And as for the 12 months, it's about 60-some-odd percent, 65% approximately.

Jeff Van Rhee

Okay. Tom, the -- you referenced again on this call and you talked about it last call as well. I mean, obviously, the order book is full and you've got to figure out how to allocate and which orders to take. But one of the responses has been to ramp production. Just talk a little bit about where you are in that volume production ramp, that build-out. Are you hitting your throughput goals? It's a challenge to keep up this level of growth. Curious how you're doing on that volume production shift.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. It's a really good question, Jeff. I think that's certainly one of our biggest challenges at this point. We are ramping -- successfully ramping up our production on a number of fronts at this point. But we -- there are some challenges and limits to what we are able to achieve in that regard. And I think one of the management challenges is being able to thread the needle appropriately so that we -- of course, we never like to turn down additional business. On the other hand, it's very important for us to deliver what we say we're going to deliver and to do it on time.

So in some cases, we are not signing up to some of the more ridiculously optimistic schedules that some of our customers are asking for because it's -- we don't feel that it's possible. And I think it's important for us to stand firm on that kind of a thing. But yes, it's -- we're walking a tight rope in this regard at this point. Let's just put it that way.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. Understood. And then maybe two other quick, if I could. On the proliferated LEO opportunity, I mean, I think you commented last quarter, 90% win rates in the space. And in particular, we've seen some real interesting, call it, green shoots in terms of proliferated LEO and the ability to win. Just curious, any updates there last 90 days, things that have influenced your conviction, what you're seeing in the pipeline there? Observations on P-LEO opportunity would be great.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. Yes. I think the opportunities are really good. I think that a big arena for us is the classified satellites, which -- the architecture is very aggressively moving to the proliferated satellite model. It is still in the early stages of that transition, but we're kind of at the point where we're moving from demonstrating capabilities to initial production on those programs. We're getting involved in more programs every day at this point. So that's really pretty exciting.

And -- but I think there's a tremendous amount more to come in the future. We hear a lot of talk about data centers in space, but that hasn't materialized quite yet. I know there's talk about that happening in 2027, but I think that's probably a little bit overly optimistic. But the proliferated satellite is -- that concept is definitely happening, and we are in the thick of it and very excited about that.

Sort of a variant of that, we are, of course, actively involved in some of the lunar missions that get a lot of press at this point in time. And in some ways, it's similar to the proliferated satellites. In some ways, it's different. We're not really talking about hundreds or thousands of devices heading toward the moon. But I think a lot of the approach is similar to the proliferated satellites where we're looking for a lot smaller, cheaper, faster production of things. And so I think that's important involvement for us because it helps to get our feet wet in this smaller, cheaper, faster arena.

Jeff Van Rhee

Very helpful. Last one, maybe on gross margin. Tom, I know you pay a lot of attention to which contracts you take and which you don't. And there are a lot of variables that can affect your gross margins, whether they're follow-on orders versus new and a variety of other things. Just as you look at the order book and what is to come over the next few quarters, any notable call-outs in terms of, you put up a great gross margin print here this quarter, quite a bit ahead of us, things that would drive it higher or lower? I know you're not going to call a specific quarter, but as you look out over the next 2 or 3, anything to call out about what's in that pipe and going to turn into revenue and whether those are, in particular, upward or downward pressure on gross margin?

Thomas McClelland

Yes. I don't see any particular either upward or downward pressure on things at this point in time. I guess what I'd say is it's really part of our strategy at this point, and we've talked about it before, there's so much growth in our basic markets that we're -- it puts us in a really strong position. We can be a little bit picky.

So I think for us, the strategy is to be disciplined to make sure that we bid things such that we can be very profitable and maintain our high margins. And of course, part of that strategy is being willing to lose some things if the competition is extreme and the margins that we would necessarily need to accept in order to get those programs are a little bit lower.

So we're in a really good position, and we are staying disciplined. And yes, and I think we've talked about it previously, the proliferated satellites, especially in the early stages are ones where we are willing to accept somewhat lower margins in order to get involved in those programs. But at this point, we -- there's not a major move in that direction in the sense of having to accept lower margins. We are seeing activity in the proliferated satellites, but we haven't really seen a lot of pressure on our margins. So I think it's pretty optimistic on the margin front. But yes, I will say that we shouldn't interpret that as a straight line upward necessarily as we go.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. Got it. Congrats and understood. And obviously, years of decision-making, good decision-making getting you guys to this point. So congrats to the whole team.

Operator

The next question will be from Jon Siegmann from Stifel.

Jonathan Siegmann

Congratulations on the momentum in the business. So the company has had a long history of relationships with the larger traditional companies. You've made reference in earlier calls about bidding with some of these new companies. Clearly, some success sounds like percolating on the space side. Can you talk a little bit about any penetration and success you've had with the new defense tech companies?

Thomas McClelland

A very good question. Yes, I think it's true that at this point in time, most of our success in this arena is in the space environment. We have -- I have to be very careful about talking about specific programs, but we've had conversations with a number of the newer space companies on a variety of different programs, Intuitive Machines, Astranis and a number of others.

In the defense arena, we don't have a whole lot of success in this area yet, although we are certainly pursuing things with a number of different companies. Of course, Anduril, in particular, is one that we've had communications with. Yes, let me just leave it at that.

Jonathan Siegmann

That's great. And then, maybe just on the traditional side, the Patriot and THAAD production increases. Understand you're more on the battery side versus the interceptor side, but is there any way to frame how much increases that could be for your business if we're tripling production rates for those programs?

Thomas McClelland

Yes. It's very significant. Obviously, you don't build new batteries every time you shoot off a couple of missiles. But I think we -- the bottom line is we're seeing a tremendous amount of business for both THAAD and Patriot. And I think to put that into context, I think there's a lot of activity in Ukraine talking about additional missile batteries and things. And I think that the more missiles are shot off, it tends to mean that batteries are needed in additional locations, and this translates into more business for us in these applications. So yes, it -- for whatever reason, I think the bottom line is it's a thriving business for us at this point.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The next question will be from Steve Levenson from Big Rock Research.

Stephen Levenson

I've enjoyed watching your progress over the last few years, and I'm curious about a few things. You talked about using some of your new capital to expand manufacturing. And I imagine a lot of your work is sort of manual bench work, and I'm wondering if there's an opportunity to enhance margins by using some automation, or is that impractical for the sort of assemblies you make?

Thomas McClelland

Well, it's a very good question. It's certainly not out of the question. In fact, we are looking at that very carefully, especially in quartz crystal manufacturing is an important part of what we do and the quantities that are required. I guess I should emphasize that all the -- this is part of our vertical integration. We do all of the manufacturing of quartz resonators starting from raw quartz crystal material.

And so the production there is certainly one of the challenges that we face at this point in time. And we are looking at putting in place additional equipment that has higher throughput capabilities. We tend to think of our production facility as sort of a boutique facility because in general, the quantities that we work with are relatively small for space applications and so forth and so on. And relative to quartz crystal manufacturing for consumer watches and things of that sort, our production will remain relatively small going forward, but it is nonetheless increasing. And so we are looking at putting in place equipment that can increase the throughput.

In addition to that, though, there's a lot of equipment that is needed just in general, most of the products that go into space need to be tested in a space-like environment, so-called thermal vacuum, vacuum environment where we can modify the temperature to be similar to what units experience in space. And so obviously, that's an environment which is normally not encountered on earth, and there's a lot of special test equipment in order to be able to test in those kind of environments. So that's another thing that we're looking at adding additional capacity for. And of course, there's a lot of other things that we're looking at, at this point in time. Those are just kind of a couple of straightforward examples.

Stephen Levenson

Great. That's helpful. My other question would be in terms of proliferated satellite constellations. Is there an application for the quantum sensor to gather data for the World Magnetic Model? Is that something that can be done using that device from space? Or is that more a terrestrial item?

Thomas McClelland

Well, it definitely is something that meaningful measurements can be made from space. And I know there is definitely some talk and some ideas for doing just that. I think that in terms of overall quantities, I think that would remain relatively small, but it is definitely something that we're interested in pursuing.

Operator

The next question will be coming from [ Michael Eisner, ] and Michael is a private investor.

Unknown Attendee

Great job. One quick question or two. In space, is there a specific area you see the most revenue coming from or opportunity?

Thomas McClelland

Well, I think -- no, the simple answer is I think we are seeing increasing revenue from just a variety of different directions, and that's really what's so exciting and unique about this time relative certainly to a decade or 2 decades ago. It's just -- I think we've commented on it recently, whereas a decade ago, there were something like 100 launches in a year. I think in the last year, the United States had something like -- launched something like 3,700 objects into space. So 100 objects launched into space, objects being satellites and things like that, and now 3,700. So tremendous growth any way you look at it.

The traditional satellite activity is booming. We have a lot of work going on right now. But the new proliferated satellite stuff is also very active, and we have a lot of programs that we're getting involved in. And as we demonstrate success on those programs, we see more and more coming in the front door. So pretty exciting.

Unknown Attendee

I like the answer. What's the book-to-bill at this time?

Thomas McClelland

Steve, you got those kind of numbers?

Steven Bernstein

The book-to-bill is about 1.76:1 for the quarter.

Unknown Attendee

1.76:1. All right. Excellent.

Operator

And the next question will be from Robert Smith from the Center of Performance Investing.

Robert Smith

Congratulations on the ramp. It's superb to see. My first question is, can you give me the current R&D figure? And how do you see R&D as a percent of revenue going forward, considering the large targets that you have for growth?

Thomas McClelland

So a good question. I think a couple of qualitative statements first. I think -- and we've talked about this in the past, but one of the overall strategies for the company is to try to get as much external funding for R&D as possible. I think this is really important in the kind of products that we specialize in because the primary customer for our products is really the U.S. government. And when the U.S. government funds research, it's always because they're funding applications that they're interested in. And of course, that's what we want to focus our research and development on what our customers are interested in as opposed to stuff that might be intellectually interesting, but not necessarily -- doesn't necessarily lead to profitable products down the road.

So that's the first thing is to try to get external funding for as much research and development as possible. But talking about the internal R&D, I think that, like a lot of things, you have to understand that there will be fluctuations. And so I don't want to make statements that we'll be held to on a quarter-by-quarter basis. But I think that we anticipate the internal R&D funding to stay under 10% of revenue at this point in time. I think that we will see in an absolute sense, some additional R&D expenditures over the next couple of years as our revenue grows. I hope that gives at least a bit of an answer to your question.

Robert Smith

It does. And my second question is, would you at all consider the initiation of a small cash dividend to attract any number of institutions that won't buy the security without a cash payment?

Thomas McClelland

Well, we have done so in the recent past, and I think we certainly will consider that going forward. I'm not making any promises at this point. But yes, definitely something that's on the table.

Operator

And there were no other questions at this time. I would now like to hand the call back to Thomas McClelland for closing remarks.

Thomas McClelland

Thank you. Thanks for taking the time to listen and participate in today's earnings call, and we look forward to providing further updates in the coming months. Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.