シェブロン(CVX)2026年第3四半期決算説明会:キャッシュフロー、過去最高の生産量、ベネズエラでの成長
シェブロンの2026年第3四半期の純利益は99億ドル、調整後純利益は104億ドル、調整後フリーキャッシュフローは142億ドルとなった。同社は負債を30億ドル以上削減し、現金を40億ドル以上積み増した。総生産量は日量約400万石油換算バレル(BOE)を記録し、天然ガス生産量は過去最高を更新した。米国のアップストリームおよびパーミアン盆地での生産は高水準を維持している。また、ベネズエラ事業の生産拡大計画やAI活用による価値創出を進め、通期の設備投資はガイダンスの下限となる見込みである。
主要ポイント
- シェブロンが発表した2026年第3四半期の純利益は99億ドル(1株当たり5.06ドル)となった。調整後純利益は104億ドル(1株当たり5.28ドル)であった。
- 運転資本を除く営業活動によるキャッシュフローは166億ドルに達し、調整後フリーキャッシュフローは142億ドルとなった。シェブロンは負債を30億ドル以上削減し、現金を40億ドル以上増やした。
- 生産量はほぼ日量400万石油換算バレルに達し、これには日量90億立方フィートを超える過去最高の天然ガス生産量が含まれる。米国のアップストリーム生産量は日量200万BOEを5四半期連続で上回った。
- シェブロンは、ベネズエラにある3つの合弁事業からの総生産量を2031年までに日量約60万バレルへと倍増させる計画である。経営陣は総コストを1バレル当たり20ドル未満と見込んでおり、このプログラムは自己資金で賄われ、大規模なインフラ改修は必要とされない。
- パーミアン盆地での生産量は、6四半期連続で日量100万BOEを上回った。シェブロンはフリーキャッシュフローと効率性を重視しつつ、生産量をこの水準で維持する意向である。
- 経営陣によると、AIへの取り組みにより年初来で1億ドル以上の価値が創出された。シェブロンは探鉱支出を2025年比で50%増額しており、探鉱候補資産の拡充を図っている。
主要財務データ
| 指標 | 2026年第3四半期実績 | 解説 |
|---|---|---|
| 報告純利益 | 99億ドル | 1株当たり5.06ドルに相当 |
| 調整後純利益 | 104億ドル | 1株当たり5.28ドルに相当、前四半期比で16億ドル減少 |
| 営業活動によるキャッシュフロー(運転資本を除く) | 166億ドル | 負債削減と手元資金の積み上げに寄与 |
| 調整後フリーキャッシュフロー | 142億ドル | 四半期実績 |
| オーガニック設備投資 | 39億ドル | 通期支出はガイダンスの下限となる見込み |
| 総生産量 | 日量約400万BOE | 取得権益(エンタイトルメント)の影響や計画的な定期修理があったものの |
| 天然ガス生産量 | 日量90億立方フィート(Bcf/d)超 | 四半期としての過去最高を更新 |
| CFFO(営業キャッシュフロー)に対する純負債倍率 | 0.4倍 | 堅調なキャッシュ創出により改善 |
| 負債削減 | 30億ドル超 | 当四半期中 |
| 手元資金の増加 | 40億ドル超 | 当四半期中 |
調整後アップストリーム利益は、販売実現価格の低下、引き取り量の減少、および不都合なタイミング効果により前期比で減少したものの、減価償却費・減耗費・償却費の減少や税効果により一部相殺されました。調整後ダウンストリーム利益は、精製マージンと販売量の拡大により増加し、不都合なタイミング効果を十分に補いました。
事業および操業実績
アップストリームおよび主要生産地域
米国のアップストリーム生産量は日量200万BOEを5四半期連続で上回りました。パーミアン盆地では日量100万BOEを6四半期連続で上回る記録を達成したほか、シェブロンは米国メキシコ湾での四半期深海生産量および東地中海での過去最高生産量を報告しました。
シェブロンは、パーミアン戦略について生産水準の維持とフリーキャッシュフローの最大化に引き続き重点を置いていると述べました。バレル当たりの設備投資額は25%超改善し、掘削および完井への支出は40%減少、設備関連支出は50%減少しており、同社は安定した操業範囲内で生産量を維持しています。
ボトルネック解消プロジェクトにより、最近日量8万5,000バレルを超えるアップストリーム能力が追加されました。シェブロンは、TCOの第3世代プラントにおける20%の生産能力拡大、バリーモアでの7%の拡大、およびアンカーでの33%(すなわち日量2万5,000バレル)の拡大を発表しました。
ベネズエラ成長計画
シェブロンは、ベネズエラにおける3つの合弁事業からの総生産量が年末までに約日量30万バレルに達すると予想しており、過去12か月間で20%増加したことになります。同社は一次回収を用いて、生産量を2031年までに約日量60万バレルへと倍増させる計画です。
経営陣は本プログラムについて自己資金で賄われるものであり、総資本支出および操業費用は1バレルあたり20ドル未満に収まると説明しました。シェブロンは合弁事業で生産されるすべての原油を販売しており、その大部分は米国の製油所向けとなっています。同社はまた、既存のインフラは適切に維持管理されており、計画中の拡張に向けた大規模な改修は不要であると述べました。
精製・化学事業
シェブロンは、自社の精製システム全体で過去最高の原油処理量を達成しました。過去2年間の米国製油所における定期修理(ターンアラウンド)の80%以上が、上位25%(第1四分位)の短期間で完了しました。
独自の触媒により、シェブロンの米国最大級の製油所で中間留分の生産量が10%以上増加しました。第3四半期の米国における中間留分の歩留まりは46%に達しました。パサデナ製油所の能力は、わずかな費用で約15%拡大した一方、シェブロンはパスカグーラ製油所の能力が2030年までにさらに7%拡大すると見込んでいます。
経営陣は、製油所の稼働率回復と輸出の増加に伴いマージンが落ち着く前に、短期的には精製マージンが高水準を維持すると予想しています。化学事業について経営陣は、マージンが年末まで、そして潜在的には2027年まで高水準にとどまる可能性があるとする一方、設備能力の合理化やプロジェクトの延期が行われなければ供給過剰が再び発生する可能性があると警告しました。
バッケン事業の再編
シェブロンはバッケンにおける中流手数料(ミッドストリーム・タリフ)の50%削減を見込んでおり、経営陣はこれにより川上事業のリターン向上、採掘可能資産の拡大、および操業の柔軟性向上がもたらされると述べています。同社は、約180,000 BOE/日の生産量を維持しながら、年末までに掘削リグを3基から2基に削減する計画です。
長尺横掘り(ロングラテラル)の比率は、2026年の作業全体の60%から、2027年には85%超へ増加する見込みです。本取引により、全社の使用資本利益率(ROCE)が0.5パーセントポイント向上し、37億ドルの負債が非連結化される見通しです。
探鉱とAI
シェブロンは2年間で2,200万エーカーを追加し、探鉱対象エリアを倍増させ、12の新たな堆積盆地に進出しました。同社は同期間にインフラ主導の発見を15件報告しており、経営陣によればその成功率は業界平均を40%上回る水準でした。
AIのパターン認識により、米国湾岸地域(Gulf of America)で150件を超えるリード(有望候補)が特定され、16件のプロスペクト(掘削候補)が評価段階に進んでいます。シェブロンは約年間20件の探鉱井。長期的に、インフラ主導型とフロンティア型の機会にほぼ均等に配分されます。
経営陣は、シェブロンが操業する施設へのタイバック(接続)範囲内にあるアンゴラでの発見を強調しました。1054X井では、石油およびガスコンデンセート層が2,000フィートを超え、約300フィートの純層厚(ネットペイ)であったことが、電話会議での説明で確認されました。
経営陣によるガイダンス
- シェブロンは、第4四半期の設備投資額が過去の傾向に沿って増加すると見込んでいるものの、通期の支出は年間ガイダンスの下限付近で着地する見通しです。
- 同社は自社株買いについて、公表済みの25億ドル〜30億ドルの範囲内に維持する方針です。
- バッケン資産の取引は2026年第4四半期末の完了に向けて順調に進んでいます。シェブロンは、30億ドル〜40億ドルの一時的かつ非現金の税後会計上の損失を見込んでおり、これを特別項目として処理する予定です。
- 経営陣は、主に税金に関連するキャッシュアウトフローにより一部相殺されるものの、2027年にはバッケン事業のアップストリーム部門の利益とキャッシュフローが即座に改善すると見込んでいます。
- シェブロンは探鉱支出を2025年比で50%増加させており、30件の新たな純プロスペクトがこれを後押ししています。
- キルビー・プロジェクトは、初の売電(初回送電)を2028年に、全面通電を2031年に開始することを目指しています(許認可、最終投資決定、EPC完了、資金調達が条件)。本プロジェクトの設備容量は2.67ギガワットで設計されており、マイクロソフトとの20年間の電力購入契約(PPA)によって裏付けられています。
- 経営陣は、取締役会での審議を経た後、12月にシェブロンの2027年資本計画に関する詳細を追加発表する予定です。
リスクと注視すべき分野
商品価格の変動性は引き続き主要な変動要因です。経営陣は、1バレルあたり64ドルの四半期内価格差(スプレッド)に言及し、当四半期中の原油価格は1バレルあたり68ドル〜132ドルの間で推移したと述べました。四半期終盤の急激な価格上昇は運転資本に悪影響を与え、シェブロンは価格上昇時には期ずれ(タイミング)効果が発生し、価格下落時にはそれが逆転すると予想しています。
ベネズエラ事業には、地政学的・地上リスクおよび契約上のリスクが伴います。経営陣はリスク管理策として、財政条件の改善、安定化条項、国際仲裁条項、原油のマーケティングおよび収益フローに対するシェブロンの管理権、ならびに自給自足型(セルフファンディング)の資金構造を挙げました。
運賃、物流、保険コストの高騰が原油採算性に影響を与えています。シェブロンは、多くの契約が現在の紛争前に確保されたため、自社保有船および長期チャーター船団が優位性をもたらしていると述べていますが、この優益性が持続する期間は混乱がどのくらい続くかに依存します。
TCOの利権延長の時期および最終条件については、現在も交渉中です。経営陣は協議が核心的な問題に絞られており、懸念点(レッドフラッグ)は見当たらないと述べたものの、完了予定時期については明らかにしませんでした。
アナリスト質疑応答のハイライト
- 資本配分: シェブロンは、継続的な配当成長、効率的な投資、バランスシートの健全性、サイクルを通じた自社株買いという優先順位に変更はないと述べました。同社は配当を39年連続で引き上げています。
- パーミアン戦略: 経営陣は、現在の水準を超える短期的な成長よりも、効率性とフリーキャッシュフローを優先しています。四半期ベースの生産量は、3%程度前後する可能性がありますが、日量100万BOE超の水準を維持します。
- TCO利権延長: シェブロンはカザフスタンとの交渉を建設的であると説明しました。いかなる合意も、同国にとって競争力のある成果をもたらし、既存および将来のパートナー資本に対して許容可能なリターンを提供するものでなければなりません。
- M&A:経営陣は、ポートフォリオに買収を必要とする重大な不備はないと述べた。シェブロンは今後も取引の評価を継続するものの、特にコモディティ価格が高い局面では価値重視の規律を強調した。
- オーストラリアのLNG:ゴルゴンとウィートストーンはすでに公称生産能力を上回る水準で稼働している。経営陣は、バックフィルプロジェクトや継続的な信頼性向上とともに、さらなるボトルネック解消の余地があるとみている。
- イラクと長期的な成長:シェブロンは、イラクにおいてより競争力のある条件を交渉中であり、主に掘削を中心とする開発計画に取り組んでいると述べた。インフラ支出は限定的で管理可能な規模にとどまる見込みである。
決算説明会トランスクリプト全文
決算説明会の完全なトランスクリプト
経営陣による説明
Operator
Good morning. My name is Katie and I will be your conference facilitator today. Welcome to Chevron's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I will now turn the conference call over to the Head of Investor Relations of Chevron Corporation, Jeanine Wai. Please go ahead.
Jeanine Wai
Thank you, Katie. Welcome to Chevron's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. I'm Jeanine Wai, Head of Investor Relations; our Chairman and CEO, Mike Wirth; Vice Chairman, Mark Nelson; and CFO, Eimear Bonner, are all on the call with me today.
We'll refer to the slides and prepared remarks that are available on Chevron's website. Before we begin, please be reminded that this presentation contains estimates, projections and other forward-looking statements. A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures can be found in the appendix of this presentation. Please review the cautionary statement and additional information presented on Slide 2.
I'll now turn it over to Mike.
Michael Wirth
Thanks, Jeanine. Chevron delivered another quarter of outstanding operational performance and disciplined execution, reliably supplying the energy the world needs. In the U.S., upstream production was more than 2 million barrels of oil equivalent per day for the fifth consecutive quarter. we achieved record crude throughput in our refining system, helping meet demand in supply-constrained markets.
We also continued investing to develop future energy supply. We announced the discovery in Angola within tieback range of Chevron-operated facilities providing an opportunity for short-cycle, capital-efficient development. Our joint venture with Bunge completed commissioning of a Louisiana oilseed processing plant on schedule, providing additional feedstock for Chevron's leading U.S. biofuels business. We expanded our acreage and established new fiscal terms in Venezuela, and we recently announced an expected 50% reduction in Bakken midstream tariffs that expands economic inventory and competitiveness.
Chevron is well positioned to deliver more energy today and well into the future. Venezuela will be part of that story, where we have deep on-the-ground expertise built over our 100-year history there. With new fiscal terms, Venezuela is now more competitive within our portfolio and immediately accretive and free cash flow positive. Last month, we announced plans to double production from our 3 joint ventures to roughly 600,000 barrels of oil per day, all on primary recovery by 2031. This development program will be self-funding and could extend further into the 2030s, underpinned by billions of barrels of resource.
Total costs are expected to be under $20 per barrel with competitive investment returns and no major upgrades are needed as infrastructure has been well maintained. Chevron markets 100% of the crude from the 3 ventures, with the majority going to U.S. refiners, including Pascagoula and El Segundo, adding to domestic product supply. We'll look to capture additional value as we optimize product flows across our system, and we're on track to reach around 300,000 barrels of oil per day of gross production by year-end, up 20% over the last 12 months.
Now I'll turn it over to Mark to discuss our operational achievements.
Mark Nelson
Thanks, Mike. Our strong operational performance is driven by a relentless focus on safe execution, reliability, cost and technology. At around 4 million barrels of oil-equivalent a day, improvements in our base business create meaningful value. In shale and tight, we achieved first-quartile reliability in the DJ Basin during the third quarter by applying AI to anticipate and minimize downtime and skating learnings from the Permian, reducing loss production events by 50%.
In Advanced Chemicals, continued to deliver strong results in the Permian, increasing cumulative oil-equivalent production by up to 23% in the first 12 months. We also delivered strong performance in other parts of Upstream, including record quarterly production in the Eastern Mediterranean as the Tamar Optimization Project and Leviathan Third Gathering Line ramped quickly. And reliability in Australia continues to be strong, where predictive maintenance, centralized data-driven decision-making and AI help to maximize LNG supply into a tight market.
In Downstream, efficient turnarounds and flexibility to respond to market conditions are essential to meet customer needs. More than 80% of Chevron's U.S. refinery turnarounds over the last 2 years were completed with first quartile duration. We have pure leading complexity, and we're deploying a proprietary catalyst increasing distillate yields by more than 10% at our largest U.S. refineries. We're also adding supply by increasing capacity at existing production facilities and refineries through highly capital-efficient expansion.
In Upstream, debottlenecking projects have recently added capacity of more than 85,000 barrels of oil per day. We announced a 20% capacity increase in TCO's third generation plant, taking total processing capacity to slightly over 1 million barrels of oil per day. At Ballymore, a 7% increase in capacity contributed to record deepwater production in the Gulf of America. And at Anchor, facility capacity has increased 33% or 25,000 barrels of oil per day, which should benefit new wells coming online over the next year. We've done the same thing in refining, contributing to record quarterly U.S. crude throughput at a time when the market needs it.
At Pasadena, we accelerated debottlenecking to increase refinery capacity by approximately 15% at nominal cost. We'll continue to pursue additional low-cost debottlenecking projects where practical, including at Pascagoula, where we expect to increase refining capacity by another 7% by 2030. In exploration, our new operating model centralizes expertise applies one global standard to rank and select opportunities and drives faster decisions. Together with new technology and leadership, this is reshaping our portfolio and changing outcomes. We've added 22 million acres over the last 2 years, doubling our footprint. This includes 12 new basins with a focus on both sides of the South Atlantic margin and Eastern Mediterranean.
AI is changing what we see subsurface and how quickly we see it. One of our proprietary AI solutions, ApEx, draws on 4 petabytes of data and 100 years of company knowledge now pulling together basin information in hours, not months. ScoutAI, now deployed in 10 new basins, build basin assessment in hours, not weeks. And our latest technologies, combined with AI-assisted interpretation, provide sharper subsurface imaging to identify and high-grade new prospects with greater conviction. AI pattern recognition has identified more than 150 leads in our Gulf of America portfolio alone, with 16 prospects moving into evaluation. All of this is leading to better outcomes.
We've made 15 infrastructure-led discoveries in 2 years at a success rate of 40% above the industry average. Real-time optimization using AI continuously monitors drilling conditions, recommends actions to reduce nonproductive time and maximizes performance. With 30 net new prospects identified, we're increasing exploration spend by 50% relative to 2025 and are focused on executing with capital and cost discipline.
I'll now turn it over to Eimear to discuss the financial results.
Eimear Bonner
Thanks, Mark. For the third quarter, Chevron reported earnings of $9.9 billion or $5.06 per share. Adjusted earnings were $10.4 billion or $5.28 per share. Cash flow from operations, excluding working capital, was $16.6 billion. Organic CapEx was $3.9 billion in the quarter. In line with historical trends, we expect fourth quarter CapEx to increase while still finishing the year at the low end of our annual CapEx guidance. Chevron's net debt coverage ratio improved in the quarter as a result of the strong cash generation.
Adjusted third quarter earnings were $1.6 billion lower versus last quarter. Adjusted Upstream earnings decreased due to lower realizations, lower liftings and unfavorable timing effects and were partly offset by lower DD&A and tax effects. Adjusted Downstream earnings increased primarily due to higher refining margins and volumes, more than offsetting unfavorable timing effects. Chevron generated $16.6 billion of cash flow from operations, excluding working capital and $14.2 billion of adjusted free cash flow in the quarter. We reduced debt by more than $3 billion and grew cash by more than $4 billion, further strengthening our balance sheet, enhancing our ability to fund the long-term investments needed to reliably deliver energy long into the future.
Net debt to CFFO at the end of the quarter was 0.4x. Working capital was negatively impacted by sharp commodity prices increases late in the quarter. Looking forward, consistent with historical trends, we anticipate additional timing effects when prices are rising and unwinds when prices are falling. Third quarter production was nearly 4 million barrels of oil equivalent per day despite anticipated entitlement impacts and planned turnarounds, highlighting sustained operating performance across the portfolio. This includes one month of production from our Venezuela joint ventures following the change to equity accounting.
We delivered a new quarterly natural gas production record, producing more than 9 billion cubic feet per day led by strong performance in Australia and Eastern Mediterranean. In addition, other core assets achieved new performance levels. In the U.S. Gulf of America, they set a new quarterly deepwater production record. The Permian recorded sixth consecutive quarter above 1 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, and TCO has been operating near full rates over the last several months.
In closing, Chevron delivered another quarter of strong performance and yet we're never satisfied. Execution is excellent across the base business and projects, and we're relentlessly pursuing opportunities to safely improve further. Technology is an important part of that. Our proprietary capabilities are helping increase reservoir recoveries and get more from every barrel we process. 2026 is also proving to be an inflection year for AI, with more than $100 million in value capture to date with much more building quickly. At the same time, the strength of our partnerships is creating opportunities for the next decade. We see that in Venezuela, in our efforts to expand our concession next Kazakhstan and as we pursue growth opportunities in Iraq.
Underpinning all of this is an unwavering commitment to consistent financial priorities and capital cost discipline. We're delivering strong performance today while stocking competitive growth options to reliably deliver the energy the world demands for decades to come.
I'll now hand it back to Jeanine.
Jeanine Wai
Okay. Thank you, Eimear. That concludes our prepared remarks. Additional guidance can be found in the appendix of this presentation as well as on the slides and other information posted on chevron.com. We're now ready to take your questions. We ask that you please limit yourself to 1 question, and we'll do our best to get all of your questions answered.
Katie, please open the line.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan.
質疑応答
Arun Jayaram
Appreciate the color on your opportunity set in Venezuela as an early mover advantage. I was wondering if you could maybe touch a little bit on the cost structure. I know that when you put that out in September, it was probably $10 a barrel lower than we're thinking. And maybe you could also elaborate on how you're managing some of the aboveground risk as we think about restarting activity in Venezuela?
Michael Wirth
Yes. So let me comment on the risk question, and then maybe I'll ask Eimear to make some comments on the cost structure. Arun, we manage risk around the world as part of our everyday business. One of the ways we do that is by having strong terms. And that gives us the ability to generate strong financial returns. And certainly, we've seen the terms on offer in Venezuela become much more competitive. We also have provisions in this contract relative to stability clauses, international arbitration, et cetera, which are as good as we see anywhere in the world.
Now one of the most important ways to address risk is not by relying on contracts, but it's by doing what you say you're going to do. It means you contribute to the economy, you meet your obligations, you treat people right and you're a positive force in society and in the country. And in our 100-year history in Venezuela, I'm very proud of the way our company has contributed through jobs, investments in communities generating a lot of tax revenue, bringing our values and focus on safety and reliability. So to me, the best way to manage those risks is to have support of the people in the country and the -- and that leads to an environment where you can resolve any differences that may emerge.
The last thing that I'll say, maybe 2 last things. that are different today than they have been historically is, number one, we are lifting all of the oil. And so it's not going -- it's not being marketed by PDVSA. It's being marketed by us. We then control the flow of the revenue back into the country and the disbursement of taxes and royalties that are legally obligated the payment of costs et cetera. The second thing is we're covering the last bit of debt that has accrued through loans that were made long ago. And as we go forward, this will all be self-funding. And so the capital will be generated through the revenues in the venture, and we won't be exposing additional capital investments.
So it will be recovered quickly. It's a factory type drilling program that has analogs to other things we do elsewhere in the world. and we can manage the pace of activity up or down as market conditions call for it. So it's a very different set of dynamics than we've historically had in Venezuela. We're also very pleased with the cost structure that I'll let Eimear talk a little bit about the $20 number we put out there today.
Eimear Bonner
Yes. Thanks, Mike. The cost structure is really competitive. So total cost less than $20 a barrel. So think of that as CapEx on OpEx. And as Mike said, this is a factory like operations. So we'll continue to learn, continue to become more efficient over time. So this is low cost. It's a high return, very competitive within our portfolio. Another thing I would mention is we're not anticipating that we'll have any major additional infrastructure spend as we double production between 300 sites and 600 sites and through the end of the decade. So we have the infrastructure we need. And as we build out and as we grow, there'll be more small capital versus anything nature. Those are the key things.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Devin McDermott with Morgan Stanley.
Devin McDermott
So I wanted to check in -- I wanted to check in on the TCO concession extension progress. There have been some media reports recently making statements around some of the government asks includes things like onetime payments or working interest adjustments. And I understand you might not be able to talk specifics or comment on that media speculation, but I was hoping you could talk at a higher level on progress and then you can share on how the dialogue has been going? Any thoughts on time lines? And then I guess the key question is based on your learnings in the process so far what is an ideal win-win outcome look like in your view?
Michael Wirth
Yes. Thanks, Devin. You're right. I'm not going to comment on media reports or specifics, but I can't talk about the process. We continue to make good progress, and I continue to be very encouraged. The discussions began a little bit over a year ago. We've had technical, commercial and legal teams meeting on a regular cycle. I've been in contact with the President multiple times during this period of time to be sure that we stay aligned. All the TCO partners have been at the table and have been actively participating, although relevant government officials have been in all these meetings and has ensured good alignment the list of issues has narrowed really to what I'd call the fundamental core issues, and we're focused on working those. I think they're very reasonable issues to be on the table.
There are the things you would expect here, 35 or so years after the initial deal was put together. And we're working our way through those. So this is a large complex contract and obviously, a very important asset to the Republic. I don't see any red flags. And so we continue to be pleased. I'll give you more meaningful updates as we have milestones report. In terms of what good looks like, we need to have something that is in today's world, I think, competitive for the Republic. And they want to see their large resource assets stewarded responsibly, which is something we're very proud to have done for our years there. And the work on the technical side of this is to have a development plan that we're very aligned around going forward as we continue to steward this massive resource position for decades into the future.
For the partners, we need something that's a competitive value proposition. And that means that for the capital we've already invested and the capital we would invest going forward that we can get a competitive return. Everybody -- every one of the partners has alternatives in their portfolios, and this needs to be competitive as we've discussed with Venezuela and other assets. And I think each side understands what the other side is looking to accomplish and we're working together to land this in a place that all the parties feel that this is an agreement that meets their needs. So more to follow as we reach significant milestones.
Operator
We will take our next question from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs.
Neil Mehta
I just wanted your perspective on the Bakken since the last time we connected you did restructure some of the Hess Midstream contracts. So just trying to think about the financial impact, but maybe just stepping back, big picture, now that you've had some time with the Bakken, do you view that asset as core or not?
Mark Nelson
Thanks, Neil. This is Mark. I'll give the front end of this, and then we'll have Eimear comment on the -- kind of some of the economics. But our operational activities that we've been working on in regard to improvements day-to-day and this action with some midstream are all about enhancing value and increasing flexibility. As Mike mentioned in his comments, the 50% reduction in tariff, quite frankly, makes the Bakken stronger. It improves upstream returns. It expands economic inventory, and it maybe most importantly, increases operational flexibility. And this is what excites me the most because it will allow us to evaluate the full potential of the basin.
We've already begun to put in place more optimized development plans that build on the ongoing operational improvements that we have been building in over time. We'll move from 3 rigs to 2 rigs at year-end while sustaining 180,000 barrels a day of oil equivalent production, again, building on the operational improvements that we've made. And you should expect to see more long laterals with these changes. We'll go from 60% long laterals this year to over 85% in 2027, and we'll begin to lean into our advanced chemicals opportunity. So I'm encouraged by what I'm seeing today and the future potential. And Eimear, maybe you can help on the economics.
Eimear Bonner
Yes. Thanks, Mark. Neil, we expect to realize several financial benefits with this in addition to simplifying the reporting structure, as you mentioned. So overall, it increases our corporate ROCE by 0.5% deconsolidates $3.7 billion of debt and delivers incremental recurring earnings. So it will close at the end of the fourth quarter. We're still on track. And when it closes, we'll report a onetime noncash after-tax loss of $3 billion to $4 billion. We will treat that as a special item. And it just reflects the accounting treatment on deconsolidation, not any deal economics.
As we look to 2027, we'll see an immediate improvement in back and upstream earnings and cash flow. It will be partly offset by some cash outflows primarily related to taxes. But we're really excited about this priority operational teams are working together in our centralized shale and tight organization, of which Bakken's and I are part of that, and this transaction does takes a step further and helps us unlock more financial upside. Thanks for the question.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Neal Dingmann with William Blair.
Neal Dingmann
My question is on capital allocation. Mike, specifically, obviously, the balance sheet now is even what I call beyond pristine. When you look forward, you tend to have numerous exploration opportunities manages, I just think the opportunities both organically and externally are just broad. So given the -- I guess my question is, given how much how low the balance sheet is now is your thoughts about next year, have you changed in the way of allocation?
Eimear Bonner
William (sic) [ Neal ], I'll take this one. Yes, the balance sheet has strengthened over the course of the year. as a function of the outstanding operational performance that we've seen across the organization. Given the fact that the market dynamics are still very volatile, I mean, in the third quarter alone, a $64 inter-quarter spread. I mean we saw prices as low as $68 as high as $132 a barrel. So we're not changing anything in the short term, given that volatility -- I mean our capital allocation framework and our financial priorities are long standards and they've been in place for decades and over high prices and low price environments, they've really stood as well. So no change to capital allocation. Maybe just to recap the first priority within that is to grow the dividend consistently. We've done that for 39 consecutive years. We'll continue to do that. That is a commitment we have to shareholders.
The second is to invest capital efficiently. We have a capital program that's underway, and we are trending towards the low end of the guidance. This year, we're investing in the business today, and that's also enabling us to invest in the future. There's no change there. In fact, we're seeing in places like the Permian that we can deliver on the Gold Star with less capital. The third is to maintain a strong balance sheet so that the cash generation and the coverage ratios that you saw in the material today really show how strong that is. And the fourth is to repurchase shares through the cycle, and we have maintained our rate of $2.5 billion to $3 billion of buybacks. And we intend to be buying back shares within that range. And overall, our track record of using this framework, whether it be dividend growth consistency or buybacks for the cycle, 19 of the last 23 years, it's held up very well. So we're on track with our 2030 plan that we guided we guided in the Investor Day, and we don't see any major challenges there.
Michael Wirth
Neil, welcome back, and we will give you some additional color on the 2027 capital program in December after we meet with our board. .
Operator
We'll take our next question from John Royall with Piper Sandler.
John Royall
I wanted to see if I could dig in a little on the comments Mark made about increasing distillate yields at the refineries. If you could just provide a little detail around what you've been doing with your catalyst to boost your output on the diesel side. And then maybe just if you could talk more broadly about any other initiatives you're looking at in refining and just other levers that maybe you could pull that are similar to this lever with the catalyst and distillate yields.
Mark Nelson
Yes. Thanks, John. Maybe stepping back, I couldn't be more proud of our manufacturing team with another record crude throughput, strong reliability something we've been working on for a while, our top quartile duration of turnarounds. And then these capital-efficient debottlenecking actions, there's a lot of strong momentum. And what's interesting in the manufacturing business is that sometimes repeatability is the best equation. And so we want more of that going forward. Specifically to the change that we made with our catalyst, I think you know we've got peer-leading complexity, and that means we've got a high proportion of hydrocracking. So we were able to, after a little bit of an adjustment deploy this proprietary catalyst into our largest refineries. And it immediately with some adjustments to cut points allowed us to increase distillate production by 10%.
For our large refineries, our third quarter distillate yield in the United States was 46% and across our global portfolio was even higher than that, in fact, Pascagoula hit a diesel production record at least over the last 3 or 4 years this quarter as well. And so I think what we need going forward to meet customer needs is more of the same. In some cases, that's might be viewed as boring. I view that as exciting. We're bringing AI into our reliability equation where we're helping to predict where risks occur using 100 years of data. That's helping us continue our reliability string. We're also bringing AI into our yield equation where we're looking more quickly at how we can produce more of what customers need today. need today. And then when I think we mentioned this in our prepared remarks, for Pascagoula over the next 2 turnaround cycles will increase capacity there by another 7%. So more of the same to come and couldn't be more proud of the team. Thanks for the question, John.
Operator
We will take our next question from James West with Melius Research.
James West
So I wanted to touch on AI a little bit further. I don't know Mark has had a couple of comments on it. But Chevron was really early in the adoption and implementation of AI, not just amongst the super majors, but the oil industry broadly, oil and gas industry broadly. So I'd love to hear how you're using this at both the enterprise level and then maybe some further context on -- in your exploration programs.
Eimear Bonner
Okay. I'll get us started across the enterprise. We are sitting on both sides of the AI equation. So on one side, leveraging AI to lead and drive performance. And on the other side, delivering the energy that will power AI. We've got our focus on 3 main things. So the business using AI to make better decisions, operate more efficiently to helping meet that growing energy needs. And then the third area is really equipping everyone in the organization with the capabilities that they need. Let me give you a couple of examples because we have captured real value this year, more than $100 million year-to-date, and we expect obviously that to increase significantly as we as we scale.
Maybe shale and tight is the one to mention before I hand over to Mark to cover exploration. But we're using an AI production engineering kind of an identic assistant to help us optimize production on an ongoing basis. So we've got this deployed and in Permian and back end and in our PC assets. So this is something that we have built in high that is 24/7 optimizing the production from our wells. Another example would be how we're using AI to help us with designing wells and scoping capital projects. So there, we've got some proprietary tools that are in development, and we're testing them at a really early stage. And then on the operations and commercial side, human agent teams helping us with turnaround and refinery planning. So Mark, maybe on the exploration side, you can cover up.
Mark Nelson
Yes. Thanks, Eimear. James, quite frankly, I think it's reshaping our portfolio and exploration at a large scale, and it's delivering higher confidence prospects at pace. And the way I think about it is our goal is to have rapid access to data, reduce cycle time and then increased success rates. And in our Investor Day, we shared one of the first things we did, which was the system called ApEx, which allows us to get our hands on data more quickly for better and faster decision. This is that 100 years of data at our fingertips. .
The next thing that we did was create something called ScoutAI, which allows us to essentially do a deep basin assessment in hours. And we're applying that in 10 new basins as we speak. When you combine those tools, along with our spatial high-grading elastic waveform inversion and ocean bottom node data that we have available, we are coming up with new prospects. I mentioned in my prepared remarks, about the Gulf of America, where we created over 150 leads and then essentially added 16 to our list to evaluate. So we're incorporating this throughout the exploration process, including real-time drilling optimization. So it's touching every part of the exploration value chain, and I expect the impact just to continue to grow.
Operator
We will take our next question from Biraj Borkhataria with RBC.
Biraj Borkhataria
I wanted to go to Slide 6, which was very interesting. We obviously spent a lot of time looking at major projects, but these barrels are some of the highest value-add barrels that you have. So I just -- I was wondering if you could talk about the potential to do something like this in your LNG portfolio, and particularly in Australia, are there any sort of active debottlenecking projects are ongoing? Where are we now relative to nameplate? And what's the potential there?
Mark Nelson
Yes. Thanks, Biraj. I would view debottlenecking as a mindset, and it just builds on our mindset of capital discipline. I would say historically, manufacturing facilities like refineries were somewhat accustomed to this. But given some of the operating model changes that we've made in centralizing project activity, major capital projects as well as small projects is creating this opportunity to see across the portfolio where we have these opportunities. And we've mentioned some of the examples in the upstream from the 20% increase at FGP to the 7% increase at Balleymore and the 33% increase at Anchor, we are already above nameplate at Oregon and Wheatstone today, and I see more potential for that.
But what excites me even more than just that potential debottlenecking that can exist there. It's the reliability, the world-class reliability we have in Gorgon and Wheatstone is -- allows the customers to get what they need. And having backfill projects, highly competitive backfill projects for decades into the future allows us to continue to leverage that. So I think I see both things working together, continued reliability potential for capital efficient, expanded capacity and backfill projects will help us do what we need to do. And I think part of that led to our record production in the third quarter for the combined assets. So more to come. Thanks, Biraj.
Michael Wirth
Yes. And Biraj, maybe offline, Jeanine will follow-up with you. We've done a lot of debottlenecking already at both Gorgon and Wheatstone. And I think we've talked about that on prior calls. But we can share that information with you. So you can see what's already been done there, which is a really good story Mark's just building on.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Jean Ann Salisbury with Bank of America.
Jean Ann Salisbury
If permits for behind-the-meter projects in the U.S. become harder to get, is there more value in already permitted sites like Project Kilby. And I guess, as a related question, how large could Project Kilby get? And what are the gating factors to grow them in your mind?
Eimear Bonner
Jean Ann, we're really excited about Kilby. It's a great project, 2.67 gigawatts of power in West Texas with strong partners. We signed a 20-year PPA with Microsoft AAA quality customer, as you know, that really leverages our strength. So from the really -- from the very beginning, we designed our solution to kind of consider some of the concerns that are being expressed in terms of the grid. And so this is behind the meter power project. It won't put any pressure on the grid in the short term won't raise prices. It's usually non-portable water. And so that's why Governor Abbott on the 6th of August denies that it complies with the standards. So right now, we do have a room to expand.
We could expand this from single cycle to combined cycle. It will all depend on additional permits beyond the permit obviously, that we're working through the system for Kilby as part of our FID decision. So it's going to come down to subject to permitting. Overall, I would just say we're working towards our FID. We have our EPC contract that we're finalizing. We're working through the permit process. We have to secure our financing, but we're on track with Kilby to have first power in 2028 and full energization in 2031.
Operator
We will take our next question from Sam Margolin with Wells Fargo.
Sam Margolin
Maybe just circling back to and the broader resource opportunity. I think one of the things that stands out about Venezuela is just the pace with which the business plan came together, you were able to, in a matter of months, commit a significant development to the resource owner. And globally, it does seem like there's a lot of kind of mega resources or resource whales that are more willing to accept for an investment in partnership than in the past. And so the question is if the process with Venezuela is representative of maybe what your capabilities are globally and if other resource owners are paying attention and if you think there's a transferable opportunity with the process.
Michael Wirth
Yes. It's an interesting question, Sam. I appreciate your comments about how quickly we were able to reach a development plan and alignment with the government of Venezuela, as an incumbent on the ground as the only incumbent on the ground, we definitely have an advantage in terms of our understanding of the geology, the infrastructure. We've got a very talented workforce. We've got the service providers that are prepared to ramp up with us, et cetera. And it does have, as I mentioned, parallels with other factory development campaigns that we prosecute around the world. I'll go to Iraq as the -- maybe an analog as you talk about large resource holders and willingness and interest in bringing in new investments.
I mentioned already that the terms interact are more attractive than what we've historically seen there. And there -- right now, at least as we're working through the negotiation, they look very competitive. We are working on a development plan there in concert with the ministry and have a good line on that. And I think it will have things in common with Venezuela in terms of it will be primarily drilled. There may be some infrastructure work, but I think that, that will be modest and manageable as opposed to a major capital project. And the resource depth there is significant and there's good exploration prospects that are -- would come along with this deal. I've mentioned on prior calls that we are in discussions with other governments, a number of them in the Middle East that are also interested in that kind of a proposition.
And so we have been, I think, Eimear mentioned today's stacking growth options, very active in business development, very active in exploration with some success there and addressing the longer-term growth outlook post 2030 with a very deep set of resource opportunities that have longevity that have attractive breakeven costs, attractive financial returns and working to line those up so that we can pick and choose amongst the best of those and allocate capital to continue to supply this energy that the world is going to need well into the future. So stay tuned as we bring things to a point where we can be more specific as we were today about Venezuela, we will lay that out for you.
Operator
We will take our next question from Doug Leggate with Wolf Research.
Douglas George Blyth Leggate
I wonder if I could -- I mean, there's obviously been a lot of chartered by the government, the U.S. government about incentives for drilling and so on. I'm wondering, if we look back to when you had your long-term growth trajectory in the Permian, you slowed that down after the Hess deal and free cash flow is a priority and so on. I guess my question is, whether organically or given where your share price is inorganically, what would it take for you to go back to growth in the Permian beyond your current plan?
Michael Wirth
Well, we had signaled the intent to bring the Permian to a plateau in kind of the middle of the last decade, to be honest when were pretty modest production levels. And as we reached and surpassed 1 million barrels a day, we turned to managing that plateau, which will last not only the end of this decade, but the end of the next. And I expect well beyond that as we apply more technology to this enormous resource base. Mark mentioned in his comments today, the progress we're seeing with some advanced chemicals that are helping us improve recoveries we actually continue to have -- we've got a next generation of that chemistry that's moving out into field pilots, which we are optimistic may prove even more successful in terms of improving production outcomes and adding value.
And we continue to look at other technologies related to drilling stimulation of the reservoir and different types of fracturing technologies, all of which will provide optionality into the future. And what they can do is they can extend the economic life of the plateau. They can make it economic to grow to a higher level. They can take benches that are currently subeconomic and they can make them economic. And so we're certainly working on all of those. But in the near term, as we've just turned now for just a few short quarters from growth to managing at the plateau. We've seen a 25% reduction in CapEx per barrel.
We're seeing reductions in operating costs. We're seeing reductions in downtime events. We're seeing a tremendous amount of innovation and application of new tools and technology to get more value out of this million barrel a day business. And it's one of the things I've learned coming up through the refining side of the business is sweating the assets, challenging people to innovate and find more value every year in the way we operate can deliver significant improvement. And that's the key focus right now. Going forward, like I said, we've got a long resource life. We've got the advantaged royalty position, which is very attractive, and it creates optionality. So I don't want to speculate about what might take us back into a growth mode there, but we're building the capability to do that economically if and when, within our overall set of opportunities and cognizant of global demand and other things within our portfolio, we may choose to do that. Thanks for the question, Doug.
Operator
We will take our next question from Manav Gupta with UBS.
Manav Gupta
I was wondering if I can pick up in a little bit on the ethylene chain margins. We started the year at record lows, saw a massive bounce in 2Q. We are moderating a little, but we're still above mid-cycle. And I think your own project is probably going to start up sometime next year. So just trying to understand global supply dynamics, how much capacity is offline? And also I'm trying to understand, between refining margins and ethylene chain margins, where do you see normalization happening first?
Mark Nelson
Well, thanks, Manav. You picked a couple of topics very difficult to predict. I'll start with refining maybe and then go to pet chem margins. On the refining side, I would expect margins to stay elevated in the short term. And the world has 10% of its refining capacity off-line today. Exports are reduced due to the conflicts. And quite frankly, the products businesses have less shock absorbers. So I would expect margins to eventually moderate as refinery runs recover and export flows increase, but that will take sometime. And so on the refining side of the business, what we can do is what we can control, and that's help consumers get as much as they possibly can out of our systems. I think we've demonstrated in the third quarter that we're doing that.
On the chemicals side, it's debatable today, but somewhere between 5% and 10% of pet chem capacity seems to be offline today, and that makes markets tighter, especially from Middle East volumes not flowing. And that likely means that at least through the end of the year, margins will stay a bit elevated, maybe into next year. But I'd make 2 observations. First, without rationalization and some project deferrals, markets may very well return to oversupply as flow normalizes? And then maybe second, ethane, especially in the United States remains the feedstock of choice. And to your comments, both of those things play to CPChem's strength. It's an ethane advantaged portfolio, and they are working as we speak to bring on the 2 large crackers, 1 in the Gulf Coast, 1 in Qatar full production both will be next year, but we want those to come online safely and reliably, and they're working hard at that. Thanks for the question, Manav.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Lucas Herrmann with BNP Paribas.
Lucas Herrmann
Question on freight and freight rates and the elevation that we've seen. It's been a sort of a central topic on a number of the calls over here. But just to get some idea, if possible, on the extent to which elevated freight rates are likely to impact upon the refining business, refining profitability. The profitability probably of the organization overall the extent to which you are long short both on shipping and long-term charter shipping at this point and how it plays to the business if we should be thinking about it, what we should be thinking about it, but whether it's relevant to you with on a quarterly basis in any way?
Michael Wirth
Yes. I think has been the big mover here this last quarter, Lucas. And it's got a lot of attention. The crude oil prices historically on 2 basic things: quality and location. And right now, location really matters. If you are very close to the crude oil that you're going to run in your refinery, you don't have to move it very far. Hopefully, you got it on a pipe and not in a ship. And -- and on the other hand, if you're very distant, if you got to source your crude from a conflict region, the logistics are expensive. The insurance is expensive, time is much longer. And all that works its way from the refinery right back into the netback for your production. It's an advantage to have a controlled fleet, and we have a significant portion of our fleet that are either ships that we own or ships that we have on long-term time charter where we charter both the boat and the crew or a bare boat charter where we put our crew on that vessel. These are contracts we entered into before the conflict began, they reflect charter rates before pre conflict, which are significantly different than they are today. And so we capture that transportation margin in our economics.
And so the other thing that's been interesting is because our upstream portfolio has evolved, we've moved from -- when I was running downstream, we ran maybe 15% of our crudes were out of our own equity system. Today, we've been up in the 50% range, sometimes higher at certain refineries. And we've got the ability to ensure reliable supply from the wellhead all the way through to the loading rack with transportation that we control. and make sure that our refineries are as advantaged as they can be, to make sure that our uplift and capture on our crude production is as great as it can be. And so we're seeing significant value in optimization globally of our asset base. And so it is a material contributor to the results you're seeing this quarter. Absolutely. And I think going forward, until these conflicts are resolved, this is likely to be a part of the story in the future. Thanks for the question, Lucas.
Operator
We'll take our next question from Betty Jiang with Barclays.
Wei Jiang
If I take a step back and actually asked about M&A, just wondering, given the ongoing disruptions around the world, does that change your views around where within the energy value chain perhaps for you to have more or less exposure? How do you think about the inorganic opportunities in general?
Michael Wirth
Yes. I'll start, Betty by saying our portfolio today is the best that it's ever been, both in the near term in terms of providing energy the world needs and doing it in a way that creates value for shareholders. And then in the longer term, in the growth opportunities in both our traditional business and this emerging power sector, that we've been talking about today. And so there's no gaps or weaknesses that we see that need to be addressed. That said, you're always looking to get better. And you've seen over the last several years, we have engaged in transactions that have made our portfolio better that have added assets that have scale, have durability, have strong financial contribution. And we have -- at the other end of the portfolio, we've moved some things out that no longer compete for capital within our portfolio. for owners. And so we'll always look to be doing that.
I think M&A is a core competency of our company. I think we've got a track record of staying very disciplined through market cycles being value-focused, not deal focused and executing with really good integration. I don't want to speculate about what parts of the value chain, what parts of the world, the conflict may present opportunities in. We're always evaluating these things. But we generally don't talk about them until we've got a deal that we've actually secured at which time we'll lay it all out to you. Maybe last thing is you talk about the conflict. The history books aren't full of great deals that were done at $100 oil or $10 gas or high commodity prices. And so I think those lessons are important to always bear in mind.
Operator
We will take our next question from Phillip Jungwirth with BMO.
Phillip Jungwirth
It's been a year since you hired a new Head of Global Exploration, and we hit on AI earlier and you have a lot of good technology details in the deck, but just more broadly, I would love to hear your observations on the progress you've made in the exploration portfolio over the last 12 months. What you're most excited about going forward? And just while it's not maybe deepwater, do you see much exploration potential in Kazakhstan where the government is making a larger push?
Mark Nelson
Well, thanks, Phillip. A lot to be excited about, but let's see where to start. I think I'll start with a high-graded inventory, better technology and faster decisions, which I expect to lead to improving outcomes. I mean our -- our opportunity set is the largest and highest quality I have seen in years. We talked about doubling our acreage since 2024 into 12 new basins. In the third quarter alone, we added 6 blocks in the Gulf of America, and blocks in Angola, Nigeria, Guinea-Bissau and Egypt. And when I combine an expanded portfolio with the new technology, we are getting better imaging and higher confidence prospects. And so I would expect here over the next few years to have high-impact exploration in the areas like Namibia, Equatorial Guinea, Egypt and Suriname, just to name a few. And quite frankly, this is the highest confidence outlook I have seen in years. .
We mentioned in our comments about the discoveries that we've had, the 15 discoveries. I would expect at least half of those to be turn into tieback positions. The one I just want to emphasize in case you haven't seen it would be our Angola 1054X well. This is in the prolific lower Congo basin. The materials that have been a public indicated an oil and gas condensate column over 2,000 feet and a net pay of 300 feet with excellent reservoir quality. I suspect it will be better than that. As we look closer and closer at the data, it has outperformed our pre-drill expectation, and we're working the kind of project definition right now for a tieback to our Sana facility in Angola. So a lot more to come, but we are definitely building momentum in our exploration business.
Michael Wirth
And what I might add on to that is that the -- Mark Eimear and I were in a review, I guess, earlier this week on our exploration portfolio and some particular opportunities. And your question about talent. We have brought in new talent. I think that brings in different perspectives, different experiences, which we're seeing value from. And Mark mentioned it earlier in his comments, but we've got a very different model for making decisions now and prioritizing this work. And I think all of that stuff comes together to yield the optimism that you heard from Mark. .
Operator
We'll take our next question from Bob Brackett with Bernstein Research.
Bob Brackett
Let's continue on the theme of improved exploration outcomes how does the improved speed, the improved outcome? How does that inform your strategy? Does it allow you to take more risk? Does it drive you to increase your exploration budget or is it -- does it actually reduce your exploration budget because your chance of successes are improving? How do you frame that?
Mark Nelson
Yes. At this stage of the game, and I made some of these comments in my prepared remarks. Given the growth in the opportunity set and kind of the new team and the new approach we've brought forward and given from where we come, I would expect us to increase our capital spend next year 50% from our previous baseline last year because the opportunity set is so strong. Over time, you would expect to see us maybe drilling around 20 wells a year and think about that as half infrastructure half frontier, and we'll continue to do that over time until we see a reason to adjust, but it's nice to have an opportunity queue that gives us those choices.
Operator
We will take our next final question from Jason Gabelman with TD Cowen.
Jason Gabelman
I just wanted to go back to the Permian, if I could, and a couple there. One, production was off a little bit, still above our 1 million-barrel a day target. I wonder if that's just normal quarter-to-quarter volatility or something else was going on there. We saw a comment from your peer that there was non-op disruption. And then the other part on the Permian, if I could, do you see kind of maintaining this stable production helping to mitigate some of the rising gas oil ratios we're seeing in the basin from Pierce?
Mark Nelson
Yes. Thanks for the question. I would think about this logic, maybe we continue to focus on maximizing free cash flow there. We do have the inventory depth to grow above 1 million barrels a day, as Mike mentioned earlier, but now 6 quarters at this 1 million barrels of oil equivalent. We are driving significant efficiencies. You can expect to see this number go up 3%, down 3%, but we're going to sustain this above 1 million barrels of oil equivalent concept going forward because it is leading to the numbers that Mike mentioned. I think I'm just going to reinforce one thing that get greater than 25% improvement in CapEx per barrel of oil, that's pretty significant.
Our drilling and completion spend is down 40%. Our facility spend is down 50%. That's all because we're staying in that band. Our gas-to-oil ratio is relatively stable through the end of this decade. And so we can maybe take advantage of some other parties challenges in this regard. But I think you should expect us to continue to use the factory model. And our NOJV activities have remained fairly stable through the course of this year. There might have been a little bit of an uptick on workover rigs from our JVs, but is not material to our capital or production. Thanks for the question.
Jeanine Wai
Okay. I think that was our last question. Great. Sorry about that. We need to thank everyone today for your time being on the call. We appreciate your interest in Chevron and your participation again. Please be safe and stay healthy. Katie, back to you.
Operator
Thank you. This concludes Chevron's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. You may now disconnect.
この記事の一部はAIによって生成・翻訳され、人間によるレビューを経ています。これは一般的な情報提供の目的でのみ使用されており、投資アドバイスを構成するものではありません。







コメント (0)
$ボタンをクリックし、シンボルを入力して、株式、ETF、またはその他のティッカーシンボルをリンクします。