tradingkey.logo

tradingkey.logo
怜玢


Bitget attackers look for alternative laundering venues as NEAR, Chainflip reject funds

CryptopolitanSep 29, 2026 10:29 AM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
すべおのコメントを芋る0


The suspected North Korean attackers who stole roughly $388 million in the September 24 Bitget hack have started to run into roadblocks as the industry has continued to rally to plug exit routes. 

As of September 29, NEAR Intents and Chainflip, two cross-chain swap services, have joined Tether and Circle on the list of protocols to have either turned away or frozen funds related to the hack. 

NEAR Intents and Chainflip reject more than $50 million from Bitget hack

NEAR Intents general manager Alex Shevchenko said that the Bitget attackers tried to move more than $50 million through the protocol, but almost nothing got through. 

Shevchenko estimated that only about $166,000 was processed through the platform, while $503,000 was frozen mid-swap and the rest was refused outright. 

However, those rejected funds, according to Shevchenko, simply “went to other providers.” 

NEAR Intents is a protocol that lets people trade assets across blockchains and averages more than $100 million in daily cross-chain volume. 

Shevchenko credits SHIELD for blocking the fund flow, a system he says is a risk-intelligence layer that decides whether to ignore a quote or halt a swap already in flight by pulling signals from know-your-transaction vendors, researchers and large centralized players. 

Blockchain-tracking firm MistTrack also reported that Chainflip rejected and refunded money from the Bitget exploiter. 

THORChain is waving Bitget hackers through 

THORChain is not one of the firms to reject funds from the Bitget hack, declining Bitget CEO Gracy Chen’s public request, as Cryptopolitan reported. 

THORChain’s response was that the only real lever it has is an emergency network halt, which  protects the whole protocol and “is not a selective freeze of specific funds or an individual swap.”

A September 28 CoinDesk review of THORChain’s public records caught about 2,390 ETH swapped into 75.2 BTC. The transactions worth roughly $6.3 million took about 27 swaps, all consolidated in a single address. 

The Bybit hackers used the same route in 2025, pushing THORChain’s volume over $3 billion in five days.

Does ‘permissionless’ mean no intervention in DeFi?

NEAR Intents’ post about not processing the marked Bitget hack funds was not popular across every sector, sparking debates about what the “permissionless, open and uncensorable” label actually means. 

Vini Barbosa, a technical writer building at Ramp Labs, pushed back on September 28: “permissionless does mean neutral,” he wrote to Shevchenko, calling it “the whole point of building something permissionless.”

Shevchenko rejected the premise in his response, writing: “But permissionless doesn’t mean neutral,” adding that “The people who build these systems make choices about what those protocols enable. Refusing to help launder stolen assets is one of ours.” 

He framed it around property rights, arguing that a system where theft grants “an unrestricted right to monetize” stolen assets “is simply a system that protects the thief.”

NEAR Intents also said it would waive the 5% freeze and 5% recovery bounties Bitget is offering, so more of the money can return to the exchange, and that frozen funds will stay locked pending a legal process. 

Shevchenko did not spell out who authorizes their release or how a wrongly flagged user gets money back.

What Bitget is doing meanwhile

Bitget disclosed the breach on September 24, later revising the loss up from an initial $351.6 million after Zcash and TRON transfers were counted. Chen has said an attacker exploited a third-party security product to obtain internal credentials rather than stealing private keys, with Mandiant and SlowMist assisting. 

Circle and Tether have frozen roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT tied to the wallets, and the exchange is restarting withdrawals in phases and running its recovery bounty. 

The exchange has now opened the withdrawal service for ETH on the Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum One, BASE, and Optimism networks, following the resumption of Bitcoin withdrawals. 

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

免責事項本サむトで提䟛する情報は教育・情報提䟛を目的ずしたものであり、金融・投資アドバむスずしお解釈されるべきではありたせん。

コメント (0)

$ボタンをクリックし、シンボルを入力しお、株匏、ETF、たたはその他のティッカヌシンボルをリンクしたす。

0/500
コメントガむドラむン
読み蟌み䞭...

おすすめ蚘事

マむクロン察サンディスクAIデヌタセンタヌのブヌムが加速するなか、買いなのはどちらのメモリ株か

AIデヌタセンタヌのサプラむチェヌンにおいお、メモリずストレヌゞは䞍可欠な存圚です。AIアクセラレヌタがデヌタ転送のために高垯域幅メモリを必芁ずする䞀方、孊習および掚論システムは、モデル、デヌタ、䞭間結果の保存においお倧容量DRAMや゚ンタヌプラむズ向けSSDに䟝存しおいたす。䞻芁䌁業のなかで、マむクロンMUはDRAM、HBM、NANDの党般にわたっお存圚感を維持しおいるのに察し、サンディスクSNDKはNAND型フラッシュメモリず゚ンタヌプラむズ向けデヌタセンタヌストレヌゞを䞻軞に眮いおいたす。䞡瀟ずもにAIストレヌゞ需芁の恩恵を受けおいたすが、投資家が最終的に芋極めるべきは、事業が倚角化されたプラットフォヌムず、より高い匟力性を持぀NANDピュアプレむのシクリカル銘柄のどちらがより優れた資産配分の遞択肢であるかずいう点です。

゚ヌビディア株䟡予想過去最倧の自瀟株買い開始で300ドル挑戊ぞ

TradingKey - 米東郚時間9月28日、ハむテク株党般に䞋抌し圧力がかかるなか、゚ヌビディアNVDAの株䟡は、新たに発衚した倧芏暡な自瀟株買い蚈画が䞻因ずなり逆行高ずなった。9月28日、゚ヌビディアは取締圹䌚が既存の株匏買戻し授暩枠に1,500億ドルを远加承認し、残りの自瀟株買い可胜枠が2,350億ドルに達したず発衚した。同瀟は2028䌚蚈幎床末たでにこのプログラムを実行する蚈画であり、米囜株匏垂堎の歎史においお最倧芏暡の自瀟株買いずなる。発衚を受け、同日の゚ヌビディア株は1.68%高の228.86ドルで取匕を終え、日䞭高倀の233.21ドルを付ける堎面もあった。同期間にNasdaq指数が0.92%䞋萜したのに察し、自瀟株買いのニュヌスが株䟡に察しお明確な独立した䞋支えをもたらしたこずを瀺しおいる。
tradingkey.logo
リスク告知圓瀟りェブサむト及びモバむルアプリは特定の投資商品に関する䞀般的な情報のみを提䟛しおおり、Finsightsは金融アドバむスや投資商品の掚奚を行うものではありたせん。本情報の提䟛をもっおFinsightsが投資助蚀を行っおいるず解釈されるこずはありたせん。
投資商品には元本割れを含む重倧なリスクが䌎い、党おの投資家に適するものではありたせん。なお、過去の運甚実瞟は将来の成果を保蚌するものではありたせん。
Finsightsは、第䞉者広告䞻たたは提携先が圓瀟りェブサむト・モバむルアプリ䞊に広告を掲茉するこずを蚱可する堎合があり、これら広告䞻から広告ぞの反応に基づく報酬を受けるこずがありたす。
© 著䜜暩: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 無断耇写・転茉を犁じたす。