US Government in Talks With AI Giants on Equity Plans, Pre-IPO "Super Shareholders" Draw Attention

It is worth noting that Anthropic, another AI giant, has not participated in the relevant discussions, nor has it had any contact with the government regarding equity issues. This continues the starkly different paths the two leading AI companies have taken in their government relations since the Trump administration took office: OpenAI has actively and frequently engaged with the government, while Anthropic was once shut out in March for refusing to make donations or offer public praise.

According to people familiar with the matter, both companies had previously taken measures to prohibit private share transfers and had cleaned up their equity structures. The 'voluntary' nature of the government's shareholding, in contrast to the companies' hard ban on private capital transfers, is interpreted as an intent to introduce a unique and stable 'super-shareholder' before an IPO and to earmark a portion of future proceeds for public spending to address public pressure over AI-driven social polarization.

This news comes as OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for their respective IPOs. Anthropic confidentially filed its S-1 registration statement with the SEC on June 2 and is expected to list as early as October this year; following its Series H funding round, the company's valuation reached $965 billion, making it one of the world's most valuable AI enterprises. OpenAI also plans to submit its IPO application in the coming weeks.

Sources familiar with the matter believe that introducing government shareholders on the eve of an IPO is strategically significant, both for boosting the companies' political standing and for mitigating public concerns over AI monopolies.

In May, the U.S. government announced a $2 billion investment in nine quantum computing firms. If the AI investment plan proceeds, it would represent the federal government's first direct equity stake in leading AI companies. Analysts point out that if finalized, this could signal the federal government's shift toward a more active role as an investor in cutting-edge tech industries.

Industry participants believe the proposal for direct government stakes in leading AI firms is poised to ignite intense debate in Congress regarding national security, market competition, and the boundaries of the government's role. At present, discussions are still in the early stages, and the true intentions of the parties involved as well as the final proposal remain to be seen.

This content was translated using AI and reviewed for clarity. It is for informational purposes only.