頻率電子 (FEIM) 2027 財年第一季法說會：營收與在手訂單創新高

重點摘要

• Frequency Electronics 公布 2027 財年第一季營收達創紀錄的 2,350 萬美元，年增 70%，季增 52%。
• 毛利率達 45.8%，營業利益率提升至 22%。營業利益由去年同期的 36.4 萬美元大幅增至 520 萬美元。
• 淨利約為 420 萬美元，或每股盈餘 0.41 美元；相較之下，去年同期淨利為 63.4 萬美元，或每股盈餘 0.07 美元。
• 已獲資金到位的在手訂單達到公司歷史新高的 1.29 億美元，年增約 82%，季增 16%。預計約 65% 將在 12 個月內實現，本季訂單出貨比 (Book-to-bill) 約為 1.76:1。
• 管理層重申 2029 財年的最低目標，包括年營收至少達 1.5 億美元、毛利率 50% 及營業利益率 30%。公司表示，產能擴充可能會加速實現或提高該營收目標。
• FEIM 透過二次增發股票籌集了約 7,300 萬美元，其中包括季度結束後因行使超額配售權（綠鞋機制）獲得的約 1,400 萬美元。公司目前仍維持零負債狀態。

核心財務數據

業務與營運表現

商業與美國政府通訊衛星營收為 1,180 萬美元，約占合併營收的 50%。該金額高於先前的 650 萬美元，年增超過 80%。

來自非太空類美國國防部客戶的營收為 1,110 萬美元，約占合併營收的 47%，高於先前的 690 萬美元。其他商業與工業營收總計 60.5 萬美元，去年同期則為 43.9 萬美元。

管理層將毛利率改善歸因於產量提升、勞工與製造費用效率改善、產品組合優化以及專案推進成熟。銷售、一般及行政費用 (SG&A) 增加 50 萬美元，主要源於薪酬支出，但在營收中的占比從 26% 降至約 18%，展現出營業槓桿效益。

成長優先事項包括傳統與擴散型衛星 (Proliferated satellites)、飛彈防禦系統、軍事安全通訊、替代性定位、導航與授時 (PNT)、量子感測及太空探索。

FEIM 的數位銣原子頻率標準器已在 4 月 21 日發射的最後一顆 GPS III 衛星上投入運作。該原子鐘亦獲其他全球導航衛星系統訂購，並被列為未來 GPS IIIF 衛星的目標配備。

公司預計 2027 年及以後將帶來來自愛國者 (Patriot) 與薩德 (THAAD) 飛彈連隊專案的營收。公司亦在競標直接安裝於飛彈上的零組件，包括取代現有供應商的機會。

一項軍事安全通訊合約涵蓋 1,000 多套系統。客戶已要求將月產量提升 50% 以上，並表示未來有潛在的後續追加訂單。

FEIM 已開始向載人飛機小批量交付量產級 TURbO 裝置。公司亦在討論無人機應用，並開始進行針對潛在太空用途的抗輻射強化工作。

管理層展望

管理層維持其截至 2029 年 4 月 30 日止的 2029 財年年營收至少 1.5 億美元的最低目標。同時重申 2029 財年毛利率 50% 及營業利益率 30% 的最低目標。

公司提醒，營收與獲利能力的每季進展不太可能呈線性成長。然而管理層表示，營收趨勢、創紀錄的在手訂單、銷售管道 (Sales pipeline) 及營業槓桿均對其長期目標提供支撐。

透過增發股票獲得的約 7,300 萬美元資金將用於擴充產能，以回應客戶對提高產量與加速交付的需求。管理層表示，這項投資可使 FEIM 更快達到 1.5 億美元的門檻，並可能大幅提升 2029 財年的營收水準。

預期中的擴充主要為有機成長。任何併購都可能屬於支援垂直製造能力的微型補充併購 (Tuck-in transactions)。管理層亦預期 FEIM 未來將按年產生自由現金流，並計畫將內部資助的研發費用保持在營收 10% 以下（仍受季度波動影響）。

風險與關注領域

生產產能是一項關鍵限制。管理層將產能提升 (Ramp) 視為 FEIM 面臨的最大挑戰之一，並表示為保護交付承諾，公司可能會拒絕其認為不切實際的客戶時程要求。

擴充產能需要更高吞吐量的石英晶體製造設備以及更專業的測試基礎設施，包括用於太空產品的熱真空系統。

利潤率可能隨產品組合與專案成熟度而波動。在擴散型衛星專案的早期階段，FEIM 可能會接受略低的利潤率，但管理層表示目前尚未看到顯著的利潤率壓力。

部分新興機會仍處於早期階段。擴散型機密衛星專案正從概念展示走向初期量產，而太空資料中心的潛在需求尚未實現。太空領域以外的國防科技客戶滲透率目前也仍然有限。

分析師問答亮點

• 在手訂單能見度：在 1.29 億美元已資金到位的在手訂單中，預計約 65% 將在 12 個月內實現。管理層表示，可見合約中未獲資金補貼的部分是已申報資金到位金額的數倍，但 FEIM 僅在在手訂單中認列已資金到位的訂單。
• 擴散型衛星：管理層表示，機密衛星架構正積極轉向擴散型系統。FEIM 正從展示階段走向初期量產，並參與越來越多的專案計畫。
• 飛彈防禦：愛國者 (Patriot) 與薩德 (THAAD) 的需求被形容為相當顯著。FEIM 目前產品已應用於飛彈連隊，並正積極爭取直接安裝於飛彈本體上的零組件機會。
• 製造自動化：FEIM 正評估更高吞吐量的設備，特別是用於垂直整合石英諧振器的生產，以及額外的熱真空測試產能。
• R&D 策略：公司的目標是將與美國政府應用相關的外部資助研究效益最大化。內部資助的 R&D 預計維持在營收 10% 以下，儘管隨著營收成長，絕對支出金額可能會增加。
• 資本回報：管理層表示發放少量現金股利仍處於考慮階段，但未做任何承諾。

法說會完整逐字稿

---

完整財報電話會議逐字稿

管理層陳述

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Frequency Electronics First Quarter Fiscal 2027 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

Any statements made by the company during this conference call regarding the future constitute forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements inherently involve uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences are included in the company's press releases and are further detailed in the company's periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By making these forward-looking statements, the company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this conference call.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Thomas McClelland, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thomas McClelland

Thank you, Paul. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Frequency Electronics First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 Earnings Call. With me today is our Chief Financial Officer, Steve Bernstein.

I'm very pleased to report first quarter revenue of $23.5 million, an all-time record for FEI, up 70% year-over-year and up 52% sequentially. As we told you on our fourth quarter 2026 earnings call in July, we expected to return to growth starting in the current fiscal 2027, and this first quarter is a strong proof point of that. Further, this performance gives us increasing confidence in our ability to meet or exceed the $150 million or more in annual revenue that we guided to by fiscal 2029, which ends April 30, 2029. I'll have more to say about that target shortly.

Steve will provide additional financial commentary later in the call, but I'd like to highlight a few items. On our July call, we established 3-year minimum margin targets of 50% for gross margin and 30% for operating margin, again, by fiscal 2029. In the fiscal first quarter we're reporting today, we generated gross margin of 45.8% and operating margin of 22%, substantial improvements and solid progress on our path towards our minimum targets.

As I've mentioned numerous times over the past few years, we do not expect our progress to be perfectly linear on a quarterly basis, whether in revenue or profitability. But the trends we see in revenue, backlog and pipeline as well as the internal improvements we've made that we discussed last quarter and the operating leverage we should generate with increasing revenue position us well to meet or exceed those minimum targets.

As for backlog, it grew to a new record of $129 million, up approximately 82% year-over-year and 16% sequentially. This continued increase in backlog gives further support to our ability to add meaningful growth to FEI in the years to come.

As we've discussed before, we expect continued growth in our core space and defense markets while also seeing additional growth coming from new markets such as space defense, proliferated satellites, quantum sensing, space exploration and alternative position, navigation and timing. Today, I'd like to provide some additional color on several of these markets, all of which build upon our core timing and frequency generation capabilities.

So I'm sure you're all familiar with GPS satellites, part of the traditional space business we have sold into. On April 21 of this year, the final GPS III satellite was launched, which included FEI's newly developed Digital Rubidium Atomic Frequency Standard, or DRAFS, atomic clock. This enhanced DRAFS clock is currently operational on the GPS satellite, is on order for use on other global navigation satellite systems and is targeted at future GPS satellites, including the upcoming GPS IIIF, or follow-on, launches. This advanced atomic clock is an example of the company's important capabilities, not just to provide the precision time and frequency devices that we've been delivering for the last 65 years, but also our capability to deliver state-of-the-art products with capabilities fueling future technological innovations.

You've no doubt seen the news flow over the past several months about the critical need for missile replenishment with government plans to significantly expand production by 2030. And we've spoken with you before about our content that goes into missile batteries for programs such as Patriot and THAAD. We expect to generate revenue from those programs in 2027 and for years beyond that coming from existing orders, more orders to come and additional orders to meet the needs of allied countries.

In addition to this missile battery-related work, we're also now bidding on additional missile programs with components that go directly onto the missiles themselves. In some cases, we're being asked to bid on these -- on missile programs in order to potentially displace incumbents.

There is a secured communication program for the military that we're producing that is a good example of both the higher rate production programs we have spoken about and the push by our customers to deliver more sooner. In this case, we're working on a production contract for over 1,000 systems. In addition, the customer on this program is now asking us to increase monthly production by more than 50% while also promising additional follow-on orders. In other words, we're expanding the total size of an already high-rate production program.

For another example of our ability to use internally developed technology for expanded use cases, we're currently exploring potential uses of our mercury ion atomic clock for naval applications. Strategic submarines are a potential use case for advanced atomic clocks because they need to be underwater for months at a time and their timing cannot be updated from GPS satellites while they're underwater. So they'll need a different technology for certain use cases that require very highly accurate timing and our advanced mercury ion clocks may be the solution. We believe this is also a good example of our ability to participate in long-term programs for higher-priced systems and to do so with external funding.

In quantum sensing, we're making rapid progress in the development of advanced sensors for magnetic navigation in GPS-denied environments. We just recently delivered a sensor and associated electronics to the Army Research Laboratory for additional testing. Development is ongoing at FEI to make smaller, more capable magnetic sensing systems for alt-PNT applications.

Finally, I'd like to discuss the capital raise that we completed right at the end of the first quarter and how that may impact our long-term guidance. We've told you previously that we have sufficient capital in place to meet the minimum $150 million revenue target by fiscal 2029. Numerous customers, however, are asking us to do more for them and to do it more quickly.

To meet this customer-driven business expansion, we decided to pursue a secondary offering of our common stock in July, which raised approximately $73 million and also brought several excellent long-term oriented new institutional investors into our shareholder base. Approximately $14 million of the total came in after the quarter ended as the greenshoe was exercised.

We remain debt-free with a very strong cash position, and we anticipate being a free cash flow generative on an annual basis going forward. We would like to thank Morgan Stanley, our lead bankers on the transaction, and Craig-Hallum, who served as book-running managers, for their hard work on this successful transaction.

The capital we raised will allow us to pursue capacity expansion to help meet these additional customer requests, which may have the effect of our both reaching the $150 million minimum target sooner and making that target a substantially larger number by fiscal 2029. We also expect that some of our customers will pay for capacity expansion in certain cases.

We expect this additional revenue growth that derives from capacity expansion to be organic, and it is likely that if we were to make any acquisitions, they would be small tuck-ins to add to our vertical manufacturing capabilities. In other words, we do not intend to buy revenue, frankly, because we don't need to, given the strength of our backlog, pipeline, order book and prospects. There's an exceptional amount of growth and value creation to be gained by focusing on what is in front of us without getting distracted by a larger acquisition. We should be able to super-serve our customers with this extra capital, resulting in additional profitable growth that should benefit our shareholders as well.

With that, I'll turn it over to Steve for some financial commentary, and I look forward to taking your questions in the Q&A portion of the call. Steve?

Steven Bernstein

Thank you, Tom, and good afternoon. As Tom highlighted, it's a great start to our fiscal '27 and a strong start to achieving our 3-year targets. For the 3 months ended July 31, '26, revenue from commercial and U.S. government communication satellite programs was $11.8 million and accounted for approximately 50% of consolidated revenue compared to $6.5 million and approximately 47% of consolidated revenue during the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Revenue is recognized primarily over time under the percentage of completion method. Revenue from the satellite market are recorded in the FEI-New York segment. Revenue from non-space U.S. government Department of Defense customers, which are recorded in both the FEI-New York and FEI-Zyfer segments were $11.1 million and accounted for approximately 47% of consolidated revenue for the 3 months ended July 31, '26, compared to $6.9 million and approximately 50% of consolidated revenue during the same period in the prior fiscal year. Other commercial and industrial revenue for the 3 months ended July 31, '26 and '25 accounted for approximately 3% of consolidated revenue and were $605,000 and $439,000, respectively.

The revenue for the 3 months ending July 31, '26 was significantly higher in both segments and in consolidation by approximately 70% or $9.6 million over the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. Revenue from commercial and U.S. government communication satellite programs increased $5.2 million and over 80% and revenue from non-space U.S. government Department of Defense customers increased $4.2 million and over 61% over the same period in the prior fiscal year.

For the 3 months ended July 31, '26, both gross margin and gross margin rate increased compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross margin is attributable to the $9.6 million increase in revenue compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The 9% improvement in gross margin rate is attributable to higher production levels driving efficiencies in labor, overhead allocation, product mix and also partially due to efficiencies recognized as programs mature.

For the 3 months ended July 31, '26 and '25, selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately 18% and 26%, respectively, of consolidated revenues, a decrease of approximately 8%. However, the actual expenditures increased by $0.5 million. The increase in SG&A expenses during the 3 months ending July 31, '26 related mostly to compensation expenses. SG&A as a percentage of revenue decreased 8% over the same period in the prior fiscal year, demonstrating positive operating leverage given the higher revenue base and because the prior year included strategic headcount additions and process optimizations that were implemented to support growth in fiscal '27 and beyond, which caused SG&A as a percentage of revenue to be higher in fiscal '26.

Research and development expenditures represent investments intended to keep the company's products at the leading edge of time and frequency technology and enhance future competitiveness. Fluctuations in R&D expenditures will occur in some periods due to current operational needs supporting ongoing programs. The company plans to continue to invest in R&D in the future to keep its products at the state-of-the-art.

For the 3 months ending July 31, '26, operating income was $5.2 million or 22% of revenue and increased significantly compared to the prior fiscal year period's $364,000 operating income due to the higher revenue, gross margin and operational efficiencies as described above. The majority of the approximately $0.1 million of investment income for the 3 months ended July 31, '26 was from interest income and unrealized gains on assets held in the Frequency Electronics deferred compensation trust. This yields a pretax income of approximately $5.2 million for the 3 months ending July 31, '26, compared to approximately $557,000 pretax income for the 3 months ending July 31, '25.

Consolidated net income for the 3 months ending July 31, '26 was approximately $4.2 million or $0.41 per share compared to $634,000 or $0.07 per share for the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Our fully-funding backlog at the end of July was approximately $129 million, a new company high compared to approximately $111 million for the previous fiscal year ending April 30, '26 and compared to approximately $71 million in the year ago period.

The company's balance sheet continues to reflect a strong working capital position of approximately $90 million and a current ratio of approximately 5.3:1, helped by the company's stock offering, which increased further following the exercise of the greenshoe after the quarter ended. Additionally, the company is debt-free. The company believes that its liquidity is adequate to meet its operating and investing needs for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future.

I'll turn the call back to Tom, and we look forward to your questions.

Thomas McClelland

Thanks, Steve. We're now ready to take questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The first question today will be from Jeff Van Rhee from Craig-Hallum.

分析師問答

Jeff Van Rhee

Congrats across the board. It just looks like a fantastic quarter here. Maybe a few for me. The -- Tom, maybe touch on TURbO. I know obviously, interesting form factor, a lot of useful applications. Can you just give us a little update in terms of what you're seeing there, in particular, from the new bookings side, strength of bookings, any quantification of where revenue is going, maybe insights into the use cases, just how it's being deployed? Just sort of a broader update on TURbO would be great.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. Yes. Sure, Jeff. We're just starting to -- beginning to deliver production-grade TURbO units at this point in time, relatively small quantities still, but we anticipate things will be picking up in the near future. We -- currently, the applications are all aircraft applications, manned aircraft applications, although we have discussions with some companies regarding drone applications, which is one of the areas that we're most excited about. We are also starting some initial efforts in terms of updating the development of the TURbO units for use in space, primarily that involves radiation hardening of those devices.

Jeff Van Rhee

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just a couple of quick on the numbers front, Steve. The percent of the backlog that's 12 months? And then also, if you could, just any color around funded. I know you only report in total backlog, the portion that's funded. I'm wondering how the ratio of funded to total has changed maybe compared to, say, a-year-ago quarter?

Steven Bernstein

Well, I'll answer the first question. Well, the reported backlog is fully funded. So that is fully funded. We don't report the non-funded part, the options or things. Tom has explained numerous times, like we get a contract just for like $10 million, maybe 10% or 20% of it is funded. So only $1 million or $2 million would go into backlog. We don't report that other $8 million or $9 million until it becomes funded.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. No, understood. What I'm asking is you've got visibility to what the rest of that backlog is, but you're only reporting funding. I'm asking the ratio of what's visible to total and how it's changed? And then the second part of the question is what portion is the next 12 months?

Steven Bernstein

Well, I think it's multiple times of it going -- the unfunded portion of it. And as for the 12 months, it's about 60-some-odd percent, 65% approximately.

Jeff Van Rhee

Okay. Tom, the -- you referenced again on this call and you talked about it last call as well. I mean, obviously, the order book is full and you've got to figure out how to allocate and which orders to take. But one of the responses has been to ramp production. Just talk a little bit about where you are in that volume production ramp, that build-out. Are you hitting your throughput goals? It's a challenge to keep up this level of growth. Curious how you're doing on that volume production shift.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. It's a really good question, Jeff. I think that's certainly one of our biggest challenges at this point. We are ramping -- successfully ramping up our production on a number of fronts at this point. But we -- there are some challenges and limits to what we are able to achieve in that regard. And I think one of the management challenges is being able to thread the needle appropriately so that we -- of course, we never like to turn down additional business. On the other hand, it's very important for us to deliver what we say we're going to deliver and to do it on time.

So in some cases, we are not signing up to some of the more ridiculously optimistic schedules that some of our customers are asking for because it's -- we don't feel that it's possible. And I think it's important for us to stand firm on that kind of a thing. But yes, it's -- we're walking a tight rope in this regard at this point. Let's just put it that way.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. Understood. And then maybe two other quick, if I could. On the proliferated LEO opportunity, I mean, I think you commented last quarter, 90% win rates in the space. And in particular, we've seen some real interesting, call it, green shoots in terms of proliferated LEO and the ability to win. Just curious, any updates there last 90 days, things that have influenced your conviction, what you're seeing in the pipeline there? Observations on P-LEO opportunity would be great.

Thomas McClelland

Yes. Yes. I think the opportunities are really good. I think that a big arena for us is the classified satellites, which -- the architecture is very aggressively moving to the proliferated satellite model. It is still in the early stages of that transition, but we're kind of at the point where we're moving from demonstrating capabilities to initial production on those programs. We're getting involved in more programs every day at this point. So that's really pretty exciting.

And -- but I think there's a tremendous amount more to come in the future. We hear a lot of talk about data centers in space, but that hasn't materialized quite yet. I know there's talk about that happening in 2027, but I think that's probably a little bit overly optimistic. But the proliferated satellite is -- that concept is definitely happening, and we are in the thick of it and very excited about that.

Sort of a variant of that, we are, of course, actively involved in some of the lunar missions that get a lot of press at this point in time. And in some ways, it's similar to the proliferated satellites. In some ways, it's different. We're not really talking about hundreds or thousands of devices heading toward the moon. But I think a lot of the approach is similar to the proliferated satellites where we're looking for a lot smaller, cheaper, faster production of things. And so I think that's important involvement for us because it helps to get our feet wet in this smaller, cheaper, faster arena.

Jeff Van Rhee

Very helpful. Last one, maybe on gross margin. Tom, I know you pay a lot of attention to which contracts you take and which you don't. And there are a lot of variables that can affect your gross margins, whether they're follow-on orders versus new and a variety of other things. Just as you look at the order book and what is to come over the next few quarters, any notable call-outs in terms of, you put up a great gross margin print here this quarter, quite a bit ahead of us, things that would drive it higher or lower? I know you're not going to call a specific quarter, but as you look out over the next 2 or 3, anything to call out about what's in that pipe and going to turn into revenue and whether those are, in particular, upward or downward pressure on gross margin?

Thomas McClelland

Yes. I don't see any particular either upward or downward pressure on things at this point in time. I guess what I'd say is it's really part of our strategy at this point, and we've talked about it before, there's so much growth in our basic markets that we're -- it puts us in a really strong position. We can be a little bit picky.

So I think for us, the strategy is to be disciplined to make sure that we bid things such that we can be very profitable and maintain our high margins. And of course, part of that strategy is being willing to lose some things if the competition is extreme and the margins that we would necessarily need to accept in order to get those programs are a little bit lower.

So we're in a really good position, and we are staying disciplined. And yes, and I think we've talked about it previously, the proliferated satellites, especially in the early stages are ones where we are willing to accept somewhat lower margins in order to get involved in those programs. But at this point, we -- there's not a major move in that direction in the sense of having to accept lower margins. We are seeing activity in the proliferated satellites, but we haven't really seen a lot of pressure on our margins. So I think it's pretty optimistic on the margin front. But yes, I will say that we shouldn't interpret that as a straight line upward necessarily as we go.

Jeff Van Rhee

Yes. Got it. Congrats and understood. And obviously, years of decision-making, good decision-making getting you guys to this point. So congrats to the whole team.

Operator

The next question will be from Jon Siegmann from Stifel.

Jonathan Siegmann

Congratulations on the momentum in the business. So the company has had a long history of relationships with the larger traditional companies. You've made reference in earlier calls about bidding with some of these new companies. Clearly, some success sounds like percolating on the space side. Can you talk a little bit about any penetration and success you've had with the new defense tech companies?

Thomas McClelland

A very good question. Yes, I think it's true that at this point in time, most of our success in this arena is in the space environment. We have -- I have to be very careful about talking about specific programs, but we've had conversations with a number of the newer space companies on a variety of different programs, Intuitive Machines, Astranis and a number of others.

In the defense arena, we don't have a whole lot of success in this area yet, although we are certainly pursuing things with a number of different companies. Of course, Anduril, in particular, is one that we've had communications with. Yes, let me just leave it at that.

Jonathan Siegmann

That's great. And then, maybe just on the traditional side, the Patriot and THAAD production increases. Understand you're more on the battery side versus the interceptor side, but is there any way to frame how much increases that could be for your business if we're tripling production rates for those programs?

Thomas McClelland

Yes. It's very significant. Obviously, you don't build new batteries every time you shoot off a couple of missiles. But I think we -- the bottom line is we're seeing a tremendous amount of business for both THAAD and Patriot. And I think to put that into context, I think there's a lot of activity in Ukraine talking about additional missile batteries and things. And I think that the more missiles are shot off, it tends to mean that batteries are needed in additional locations, and this translates into more business for us in these applications. So yes, it -- for whatever reason, I think the bottom line is it's a thriving business for us at this point.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The next question will be from Steve Levenson from Big Rock Research.

Stephen Levenson

I've enjoyed watching your progress over the last few years, and I'm curious about a few things. You talked about using some of your new capital to expand manufacturing. And I imagine a lot of your work is sort of manual bench work, and I'm wondering if there's an opportunity to enhance margins by using some automation, or is that impractical for the sort of assemblies you make?

Thomas McClelland

Well, it's a very good question. It's certainly not out of the question. In fact, we are looking at that very carefully, especially in quartz crystal manufacturing is an important part of what we do and the quantities that are required. I guess I should emphasize that all the -- this is part of our vertical integration. We do all of the manufacturing of quartz resonators starting from raw quartz crystal material.

And so the production there is certainly one of the challenges that we face at this point in time. And we are looking at putting in place additional equipment that has higher throughput capabilities. We tend to think of our production facility as sort of a boutique facility because in general, the quantities that we work with are relatively small for space applications and so forth and so on. And relative to quartz crystal manufacturing for consumer watches and things of that sort, our production will remain relatively small going forward, but it is nonetheless increasing. And so we are looking at putting in place equipment that can increase the throughput.

In addition to that, though, there's a lot of equipment that is needed just in general, most of the products that go into space need to be tested in a space-like environment, so-called thermal vacuum, vacuum environment where we can modify the temperature to be similar to what units experience in space. And so obviously, that's an environment which is normally not encountered on earth, and there's a lot of special test equipment in order to be able to test in those kind of environments. So that's another thing that we're looking at adding additional capacity for. And of course, there's a lot of other things that we're looking at, at this point in time. Those are just kind of a couple of straightforward examples.

Stephen Levenson

Great. That's helpful. My other question would be in terms of proliferated satellite constellations. Is there an application for the quantum sensor to gather data for the World Magnetic Model? Is that something that can be done using that device from space? Or is that more a terrestrial item?

Thomas McClelland

Well, it definitely is something that meaningful measurements can be made from space. And I know there is definitely some talk and some ideas for doing just that. I think that in terms of overall quantities, I think that would remain relatively small, but it is definitely something that we're interested in pursuing.

Operator

The next question will be coming from [ Michael Eisner, ] and Michael is a private investor.

Unknown Attendee

Great job. One quick question or two. In space, is there a specific area you see the most revenue coming from or opportunity?

Thomas McClelland

Well, I think -- no, the simple answer is I think we are seeing increasing revenue from just a variety of different directions, and that's really what's so exciting and unique about this time relative certainly to a decade or 2 decades ago. It's just -- I think we've commented on it recently, whereas a decade ago, there were something like 100 launches in a year. I think in the last year, the United States had something like -- launched something like 3,700 objects into space. So 100 objects launched into space, objects being satellites and things like that, and now 3,700. So tremendous growth any way you look at it.

The traditional satellite activity is booming. We have a lot of work going on right now. But the new proliferated satellite stuff is also very active, and we have a lot of programs that we're getting involved in. And as we demonstrate success on those programs, we see more and more coming in the front door. So pretty exciting.

Unknown Attendee

I like the answer. What's the book-to-bill at this time?

Thomas McClelland

Steve, you got those kind of numbers?

Steven Bernstein

The book-to-bill is about 1.76:1 for the quarter.

Unknown Attendee

1.76:1. All right. Excellent.

Operator

And the next question will be from Robert Smith from the Center of Performance Investing.

Robert Smith

Congratulations on the ramp. It's superb to see. My first question is, can you give me the current R&D figure? And how do you see R&D as a percent of revenue going forward, considering the large targets that you have for growth?

Thomas McClelland

So a good question. I think a couple of qualitative statements first. I think -- and we've talked about this in the past, but one of the overall strategies for the company is to try to get as much external funding for R&D as possible. I think this is really important in the kind of products that we specialize in because the primary customer for our products is really the U.S. government. And when the U.S. government funds research, it's always because they're funding applications that they're interested in. And of course, that's what we want to focus our research and development on what our customers are interested in as opposed to stuff that might be intellectually interesting, but not necessarily -- doesn't necessarily lead to profitable products down the road.

So that's the first thing is to try to get external funding for as much research and development as possible. But talking about the internal R&D, I think that, like a lot of things, you have to understand that there will be fluctuations. And so I don't want to make statements that we'll be held to on a quarter-by-quarter basis. But I think that we anticipate the internal R&D funding to stay under 10% of revenue at this point in time. I think that we will see in an absolute sense, some additional R&D expenditures over the next couple of years as our revenue grows. I hope that gives at least a bit of an answer to your question.

Robert Smith

It does. And my second question is, would you at all consider the initiation of a small cash dividend to attract any number of institutions that won't buy the security without a cash payment?

Thomas McClelland

Well, we have done so in the recent past, and I think we certainly will consider that going forward. I'm not making any promises at this point. But yes, definitely something that's on the table.

Operator

And there were no other questions at this time. I would now like to hand the call back to Thomas McClelland for closing remarks.

Thomas McClelland

Thank you. Thanks for taking the time to listen and participate in today's earnings call, and we look forward to providing further updates in the coming months. Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.