Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 2026财年第三季度业绩电话会:订单增长,利润率降至28%
Green Brick Partners在2026年第三季度交付房屋978套,同比增长2.6%;因平均售价下降12.1%至约44.7万美元,房屋交付收入下降9.8%至4.37亿美元。净利润同比下降24%至5920万美元,稀释每股收益下降24%至1.35美元。住宅建造毛利率下降410个基点至28%,主要受销售激励增加及产品组合影响。净新订单增长3.1%至926套,Trophy品牌表现稳健,销售速度显著增长。
核心要点
- Green Brick Partners在2026年第三季度交付了978套房屋,同比增长2.6%;同时由于平均售价下降12.1%至约44.7万美元,房屋交付收入下降9.8%至4.37亿美元。
- 归属于Green Brick的净利润下降24%至5920万美元,稀释每股收益下降24%至1.35美元。住宅建造毛利率下降410个基点至28%,部分原因在于销售激励增加。
- 净新房屋订单增长3.1%至926套。Trophy Signature Homes占公司订单和交付量的60%,其销售速度同比增长11%,达到每个社区每月5.2套。
- 销售激励增加180个基点,占房屋交付收入的9.9%。管理层表示,按揭贷款利率买断通常将客户的利率控制在5%至5.5%的区间,具体取决于购房时间和社区。
- 在按揭贷款发放量增加的推动下,金融服务收入增长52%至1120万美元,税前利润增长69%至560万美元。
- Green Brick保持了低杠杆率,住宅建造债务占总资本的比例为13.1%,净住宅建造债务占总资本的比例为9.6%。季度末流动资金总额为3.25亿美元。
核心财务数据
| 指标 | 2026年第三季度 | 同比变动 | 点评 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 房屋交付量 | 978 | +2.6% | 本季度交付的房屋中有48%是在当季售出的 |
| 房屋交付收入 | 4.37亿美元 | -9.8% | 售价较低以及Trophy品牌占比提升 |
| 平均售价 | 约44.7万美元 | -12.1% | 反映了销售激励和产品组合的影响 |
| 归属于Green Brick的净利润 | 5920万美元 | -24% | 住宅建造收入和毛利率下降 |
| 稀释每股收益 | 1.35美元 | -24% | — |
| 住宅建造毛利率 | 28.0% | -410个基点 | 销售激励增加及基础售价降低拖累毛利率 |
| 销售激励占房屋交付收入的比例 | 9.9% | +180个基点 | 主要是按揭贷款利率买断 |
| 净新订单 | 926 | +3.1% | 平均活跃社区数量增长5.8%至109个 |
| 月均销售速度 | 每个社区2.8套 | 低于此前的高点2.9套 | Trophy表现优于整体产品组合 |
| 积压订单 | 629套 | -6.8% | 积压订单收入为3.79亿美元 |
| 积压订单平均售价 | 约60.3万美元 | -11% | Trophy占比提升及销售激励处于高位 |
| 销管费用(SG&A) | 5180万美元 | 约 -6% | 增长40个基点至住宅业务收入的11.8% |
业务与运营表现
Trophy Signature Homes仍是Green Brick的主要增长引擎。该品牌首次占公司总订单和总交付量的60%。Trophy第三季度的销售速度达到每个社区每月5.2套,而去年同期为4.7套,公司整体为2.8套。
50万美元以下的房屋需求最为强劲,尤其是40万美元以下的首套刚需产品。管理层指出,50万至80万美元的价格段表现疲软,尤其是亚特兰大和达拉斯北部的二次和三次改善型买家需求低迷。公司对90万美元以上产品的需求依然感到满意。
Green Brick Mortgage发放了499笔贷款,增长42%,贷款发放本金总额增长36%至约1.85亿美元。按揭贷款捕获率为66%,平均FICO信用分为734分,平均债务收入比为41.1%。
施工周期缩短了25天至116天。其中,达拉斯的Trophy项目平均施工周期为88天,低于此前的97天。公司开工建造了954套房屋,本季度末在建房屋为2181套,已完工现房为562套。
Green Brick拥有40869块地块,控制着另外10566块地块,储备地块总量达到51435块。其中约38000块地块位于大型综合规划社区中,预计将在5至10年或更长的时间内分期开发。
管理层指引
管理层预计2026年土地和地块收购支出约为3.5亿美元,土地开发资金支出约为4.3亿美元(不含报销款)。因此,计划土地投资总额约为7.8亿美元,低于此前规划的8.5亿美元。
公司预计长期按揭贷款捕获率约为70%。管理层正在优化德克萨斯州的按揭贷款业务,之后计划在2027年扩展至亚特兰大。
管理层表示,随着Trophy业务占比持续上升,第四季度平均售价可能略有下降。销售激励水平将继续对按揭贷款利率及利率买断成本保持敏感。
风险与关注事项
- 高按揭贷款利率和经济不确定性继续给购房负担能力带来压力,并推迟购房决策。
- 销售激励处于高位,如果按揭贷款利率上升,销售激励的进一步增加可能会拖累毛利率。
- 50万至80万美元的改善型房屋市场在亚特兰大和达拉斯北部依然尤为疲软。
- 管理层表示,在公司的投资回报标准(目前在核算中已将10%的销售激励纳入考量)下,很难找到具有吸引力的土地交易。
- 移民执法力度的加大已开始在奥斯汀的部分施工工种(包括砌砖、电气、干壁和框架搭建)中造成劳工短缺和成本压力。
- 积压订单套数和积压订单收入均有所下降,而退订率从上年同期的6.7%上升至8.2%。
分析师问答亮点
管理层表示,Green Brick 28%的毛利率和低杠杆率为调整销售激励留出了空间,同时仍能保持盈利。尽管9月市场环境艰难且季度内按揭贷款利率上升,但7月至9月的销售额仍实现环比增长。
在土地投资方面,管理层强调采取审慎态度。公司认为有吸引力的区位的地价并未出现大幅重置,Green Brick不会仅仅为了增加收入而盲目扩张。
毛利率的下降不仅仅反映了销售激励的增加。管理层还提到,向Trophy低价产品的转移以及基础房价的下调也是重要原因。基础售价的下调通常体现在库存价值中,而不是作为报告中的销售激励呈现。
在休斯顿,Green Brick目前拥有1个已开盘社区,预计到2027年底将再开盘2个。管理层对初期成果感到满意,但表示在该市场的新土地投资必须符合其核算标准。
业绩电话会议完整文字记录
完整财报电话会议逐字稿
管理层陈述
Operator
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Green Brick Partners, Inc. Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Jeff Cox, Chief Financial Officer. Jeff, please go ahead.
Jeffery Cox
Good afternoon, and welcome to Green Brick Partners Earnings Call for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026. Following today's remarks, we will hold a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this call is being recorded and will be available for playback. In addition, a presentation will accompany today's webcast, which is available on the company's Investor Relations website at investors.greenbrickpartners.com. On the call today are Jim Brickman, Co-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Jed Dolson, Co-Chief Executive Officer; and myself, Jeff Cox, Chief Financial Officer.
Some of the information discussed on this call is forward-looking, including a discussion of the company's financial and operational expectations for 2026 and beyond. In yesterday's press release, the company detailed material risks that may cause future results to differ from its expectations. The company's statements are as of today, October 29, 2026, and the company has no obligation to update any forward-looking statements it may make. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial metrics. Reconciliations of these metrics and the other information required by Regulation G can be found in yesterday's earnings release and in the accompanying presentation.
With that, I will turn the call over to Jim.
James Brickman
Thank you, Jeff. Before discussing the quarter, I want to recognize Jed Dolson's promotion to Co-Chief Executive Officer. As we previously announced, Jed assumed his new role on October 15. Jed has been an integral part of Green Brick since before we became a public company. His leadership, commitment to our HOME values and focus on long-term value creation have contributed meaningfully to our growth and success. I'm excited to work alongside him in his expanded role as we continue to execute our strategy, build on our foundation and develop the next generation of Green Brick leadership.
Turning to the quarter. I am pleased with the results our team achieved in a difficult housing market marked by high mortgage interest rates and economic uncertainty causing many potential homebuyers to reevaluate the timing of their purchase decisions. Despite these affordability pressures, we delivered 978 homes, an increase of 2.6% from a year ago, generating home closing revenue of $437 million with a homebuilding gross margin of 28%.
We generated net income of $59 million or $1.35 per diluted share. Net new homeowners (sic) [ home orders ] increased 3.1% compared to the third quarter of 2025 to 926. Orders increased each month of the quarter even as mortgage rates steadily rose during the quarter. These results demonstrate the resilience of Green Brick's differentiated operating model. Even as many first-time buyers continue to require significant incentives to purchase a home, we increased orders and deliveries while maintaining the highest homebuilding gross margin among our public homebuilding peers.
This quarter highlights 3 important advantages of our business: the strength of our margins and balance sheet, our owned and self-developed land strategy and the strength of our primary growth engine, Trophy Signature Homes. We recognize that the current housing market conditions are challenging. At the same time, we also believe that cyclical downturns create opportunities. Specifically for Green Brick, we believe these potential opportunities include capturing market share and laying the foundation for sustained growth when the housing market inevitably improves.
Our strong balance sheet and low leverage provide us with the financial flexibility to navigate current market conditions and invest selectively in attractive opportunities. Our homebuilding debt to total capital declined to 13.1% from 15.3% year-over-year, and our net homebuilding debt to total capital was relatively unchanged at 9.6%.
Book value per share increased 14% year-over-year to $46.10. We continue to view growth in book value per share as an important indicator of the value we are creating for shareholders over time, complemented by opportunistically repurchasing shares. Our strong margins and significant land pipeline allow us to remain patient and disciplined in deploying capital.
The foundation of our performance begins with our owned and self-developed land strategy, which remains the primary driver of our industry-leading margins. At September 30, we owned 40,869 lots and controlled another 10,566 lots under contract, giving us a total pipeline of 51,435 lots. We believe owning land gives us greater control over lot cost, the timing of development and the pace at which we bring homes to market.
Approximately 38,000 of our total lots are part of our large master planned communities that will be developed in multiple phases over 5 to 10 years or longer. By securing these parcels well in advance of home delivery, we believe we have locked in our lot acquisition basis and minimized exposure to cost inflation and escalating fees that many builders incur when purchasing finished lots from third-party developers.
One of the primary differentiators from many of our peers is that we do not rely on land banking arrangements with high interest costs that can distort a builder's economic leverage and risk, and that can give a land banker indirect control over a builder's lot purchase timing. We believe this approach is particularly valuable in the current environment.
Trophy Signature Homes is a key driver of Green Brick's long-term growth strategy. By combining attainable home prices with our land development capabilities and efficient construction platform, Trophy expands our ability to serve the large pool of first-time and first move-up buyers. We believe that Trophy's scale as the third largest builder in DFW and its continued expansion in Austin and Houston provide a clear path to grow deliveries, broaden our revenue base and strengthen our presence in our key Texas market over the next few years. Our focus remains on translating that growth into attractive returns that deliver long-term shareholder value.
Green Brick Mortgage continues to grow rapidly, driving third quarter financial services revenue to $11.2 million, an increase of 52%, while pretax income increased 69% to $5.6 million. For the first 9 months, financial services pretax income increased 92% to $15.6 million. Our mortgage, title and insurance operation helps us support buyers in a market in which monthly payments remain critical to the purchase decision.
Our goal is to consistently deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our shareholders. Over the past 12 months, we returned $57 million to shareholders through stock repurchases, while continuing to invest significantly in land acquisition and development to position us for future growth.
Even with our land heavy balance sheet and macroeconomic headwinds, for the 12 months ended September 30, our return on assets was 10.6% and our return on equity was 14.5%, which remains among the very best of our public peers. For the most recently available trailing 12-month period of our public homebuilding peers, the median return on assets was 3.9% and the median return on equity was 6.2%. Our disciplined returns-focused approach and our experienced team of operators position us well to create long-term shareholder value.
With that, I now turn it over to Jed to discuss current buyer trends and operating results.
Jed Dolson
Thank you, Jim. I appreciate the confidence of our Board and Jim as I began serving as co-CEO. Having helped build Green Brick alongside this team for many years and through different homebuilding market cycles, I am excited about our future and remain committed to the disciplined operating and capital allocation principles that have driven our success.
As Jim discussed, affordability remains the defining factor in buyer behavior during the third quarter. Buyers remain highly sensitive to monthly payment amounts and rate buydowns. Closing cost assistance and targeted price continue to be the critical tools, particularly for first-time homebuyers. Trophy's ability to meet these buyers' needs showed in our results. For the first time, Trophy generated 60% of both total company orders and deliveries in the quarter, a testament to Trophy's operating model and leadership team.
Net new orders increased 3.1% year-over-year to 926, supported by a 5.8% increase in the average active selling communities to 109. Monthly sales pace was 2.8 per community compared with 2.9 a year ago. Our industry-leading gross margins provide flexibility to use pricing and incentives to capture demand while balancing community level returns.
Our cancellation rate was 8.2% compared with 6.7% last year and remained relatively low compared to our peers. Green Brick Mortgage continues to work closely with our sales teams to help buyers qualify by identifying financing solutions earlier in the sales process. Green Brick Mortgage funded 499 loans during the quarter, an increase of 42% year-over-year.
Total origination principal was approximately $185 million, a 36% increase year-over-year. The average FICO score was 734, and the average debt-to-income ratio was 41.1%. Our mortgage capture rate was 66% for the quarter despite facing the headwind of rolling out to new communities where adoption can often take time to ramp up.
We remain focused on increasing our mortgage capture rate in Texas communities. Our mortgage team is also implementing technology initiatives and aiming to broaden the products it offers to improve efficiency, enhance customer service and support growth and capture. Based on current market conditions, we continue fine-tuning our mortgage operations within our Texas markets before expanding to Atlanta to support The Providence Group, which may occur in 2027.
While capture rates declined slightly, reflecting the continued expansion of the captive mortgage business into new communities, many of which have pre-existing outside lender relationships, we expect our long-term capture rate to be approximately 70%, supporting additional loan volume and revenue.
We continue to make progress on construction efficiency as our average construction cycle declined to 116 days, 25 days shorter than last year. Trophy Dallas' cycle time averaged 88 days compared with 97 days a year ago. While we are seeing a modest effect of labor availability among some construction trades as a result of increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in certain of our markets, we have not experienced a measurable impact on our operations to date.
We started 954 homes for the quarter, essentially flat with the prior year. We ended September with 2,181 homes under construction, down 1% year-over-year and 562 completed spec homes within our target of 1 to 2 months of supply. We are aligning starts with sales pace while maintaining quick move-in inventory for homebuyers seeking near-term delivery and rate certainty.
We continue to invest in land and development to support future growth. Through September 30, our investment in land acquisition and land development totaled approximately $597 million, including $323 million for land development, excluding reimbursements and $274 million for land and lot acquisitions. For 2026, we expect land and lot acquisitions of approximately $350 million and land development outflows of approximately $430 million, excluding reimbursements. Our total 2026 planned land investment of $780 million is down from the $850 million we communicated on our last call as we remain patient and selective on new acquisitions while preserving our ability to grow in the near and intermediate term.
With that, I will now turn it over to Jeff to provide more details regarding our financial results and our capital position.
Jeffery Cox
Thank you, Jed. Net income attributable to Green Brick for the third quarter was $59.2 million, a decrease of 24% from the same period last year. Diluted earnings per share were $1.35, also down 24%. We delivered 978 homes, up 2.6% from 953 homes in the prior year quarter, with 48% of our third quarter closings also having been sold during the quarter, reflecting buyers' continued preference for quick move-in homes.
Home closing revenue declined 9.8% to $437 million, primarily due to a 12.1% year-over-year decrease in average selling price to approximately $447,000, which reflected increased incentives, primarily through mortgage rate buydowns and a continued shift toward Trophy's more affordable product. Homebuilding gross margin was 28%, down 410 basis points year-over-year due in part to higher incentives, which increased 180 basis points from the third quarter of 2025 to 9.9% of home closing revenue.
SG&A expense declined approximately 6% for the quarter to $51.8 million. As a percentage of residential units revenue, SG&A increased 40 basis points to 11.8%, mainly due to lower revenue. We ended the quarter with 629 homes in backlog, down 6.8% year-over-year, representing backlog revenue of $379 million. The average selling price in backlog declined 11% year-over-year to approximately $603,000, reflecting a higher mix of Trophy homes and elevated incentives.
Turning to capital allocation. We repurchased 264,000 shares during the quarter for approximately $17.9 million. At September 30, $132.7 million remained available under our repurchase authorization. Our liquidity at the end of the quarter was $325 million, consisting of $100 million of cash and $225 million available under our $330 million unsecured revolving credit facility.
We also repaid the remaining $50 million of principal on our 2026 4% senior notes. Total debt, excluding our warehouse facilities, was $305 million with $63 million of senior notes maturing in the next 12 months. Our homebuilding debt to total capital ratio of 13.1% and net homebuilding debt-to-capital ratio of 9.6% remain among the lowest of public homebuilders. We believe our liquidity and financing capacity provide substantial flexibility to fund our operations while continuing to invest in opportunities that meet our return criteria.
With that, I will now turn it back to Jim for closing remarks.
James Brickman
Thank you, Jeff. In closing, we remain confident in Green Brick's long-term outlook. Our differentiated operating model and financial strength position us to navigate current market conditions and pursue opportunities for sustainable growth. While affordability pressures and elevated incentives continue to challenge the industry, our focus remains on disciplined execution, prudent capital allocation and creating long-term value for our shareholders. I would like to thank our employees and trade partners for their continued commitment to Green Brick and our homebuyers. This concludes our prepared remarks.
We will now open the line for questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Rohit Seth with B. Riley.
分析师问答
Rohit Seth
Housing market, obviously challenging during the quarter and into October with the increase in rates. I just wonder if you could comment on how demand progressed through the quarter and how we should be thinking about incentives as we enter the fourth quarter?
James Brickman
Yes. This is Jim Brickman. If you can tell me which way interest rates are going to go, I'll tell you which way our incentives are going to go because a lot of our incentives relate to mortgage buydowns. So it's very hard to predict. We watch the 10-year bond very closely. But big picture, I think one of the most important messages we want to leave investors with is that when we enter a market like this that is challenging and you have 28% gross margins and 11% or 12% SG&A, it's a huge advantage and almost very little debt.
It's a huge advantage because we are seeing many peers right now where their GAAP gross margin is about the same as their SG&A. We don't want to give up any margin, but we have a lot to give if we need to and still remain very profitable. We're seeing peers have nothing left to give. And we don't like being in a tough market like this, but we think we really have a huge competitive advantage if incentives increase.
Jeffery Cox
And Seth, this is Jeff. I'd just add on to that based on your follow-up or your other question regarding sales throughout the quarter. I would say that they follow the typical seasonal patterns. September was certainly tough, but we saw sequential increase in sales from July through September. So a little encouraged by that, but it's tough, like Jim mentioned.
Rohit Seth
Okay. And as you think about the pace and price trade-off, are you making any adjustments as we go into 2027?
James Brickman
We make adjustments every day. Jed, why don't you talk about that?
Jed Dolson
Yes. I mean, we're in the business of selling homes. Jim mentioned we have the buffer and the gross margins to provide increased incentives. We're seeing when we do make changes to our incentive packages as rates go down or rates go up that we sell more houses. So it's -- we're going to continue to balance price versus pace. And we feel there's no doubt this is a challenging market, but we feel like we can execute very well in this market.
Rohit Seth
Okay. And you're buying -- still buying down to about 5%, is that right?
Jed Dolson
Yes, varying on the day in the community, somewhere in the range of 5% to 5.5%.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Ryan Gilbert with BTIG.
Ryan Gilbert
First question is on, I guess, just your philosophy around land investment in the current market. And I know you pulled down the 2026 investment spend guides incrementally. But how are you thinking about, I guess, the trade-off between continued elevated land investment relative to prior years versus pulling back some of that spend and waiting for potentially improved opportunities in the event that the market gets weaker from here? So just how are you thinking about land spend here?
James Brickman
Cautious. Very cautious in order to have us do a significant land spend. Our underwriting criteria now has to include 10% elevated incentives into the modeling. And just -- it's hard to find land deals that work and provide the internal rate of returns we want today. So I don't expect that to change. It's interesting in that the high-margin land deals are still hard to find. Low-margin C-, D location deals are plentiful. We're seeing peers just rearrange deck chairs in the Titanic trading these assets amongst each other. I don't know why they do that. It's not going to help one or the other at the end of the day, but we're not playing that game. But if we find a land deal that makes sense, we will move on it. They're just harder to find.
Ryan Gilbert
Okay. So it sounds like land prices aren't really resetting to any material degree as of now?
James Brickman
They are on lots we don't want.
Ryan Gilbert
Okay. Got it. And then second question on gross margin. It looks like maybe around half of the year-over-year decline was related to incentives. What would you attribute the other half of the decline to?
Jeffery Cox
I would say -- this is Jeff. The other half is really probably 2 things. It's the continued shift towards Trophy who is much more -- their buyer segment is much more rate sensitive. And the other thing that gets lost within the incentive number when we look at it year-over-year is just the change in base prices that our operators have had to make year-over-year. So that is really probably the balance of the difference. Trophy is continuing to look at traffic every single week. And if they need to also reduce base prices to continue to drive traffic, they'll do that. And they'll continue to lean heavily on mortgage rate buydowns, which is what you're really seeing in the incentive.
Ryan Gilbert
Got it. So are the base -- are, I guess, individual home base price reductions included in incentives? Or is it just any base price cut regardless of whether it's individual home or community-wide base price cuts that's all excluded from the incentive number?
Jeffery Cox
Typically, when we have a reduction in base price, that will flow through to existing inventory. And so you won't see elevated incentives necessarily when those sales come through from base.
Ryan Gilbert
Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And underlying land inflation, just is, like, ballpark where are you seeing that on a percentage basis?
James Brickman
It's very low for us because our interest costs are so low that we're not capitalizing interest into our land inventory or lot inventory. And because we don't land bank, we're not incurring a debt asset that's 15% or 10% of the lot cost that's dead money and paying a land banker 8% to 12% that has to get paid somewhere, and it's getting reflected in lot prices for a lot of our land-light peers.
Jed Dolson
Yes. We're seeing our lot prices percentage of revenue is, like everybody, it's ticking up, but it's ticking up at a much slower pace than our peers.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jay McCanless with Citizens Bank.
Jay McCanless
First question I had with the mix of Trophy now being nearly 60%, is the ASP we saw this quarter, is that likely to repeat in the fourth quarter? Or could it move down a little more as you're bringing more Trophy communities online?
James Brickman
It will move down, Jed, how much, you think?
Jed Dolson
We're not going to give a number, but it could slightly move down in Q4.
Jay McCanless
Okay. And then what is Trophy right now on a sales absorption basis? What's Trophy averaging in Dallas, you think?
Jeffery Cox
So Jay, this is Jeff. Trophy, similar to last quarter, they're running about 85% higher than the rest of our brands. Their pace in Q3 was about 5.2 sales per month when the average pace of the company is 2.8. So they're moving quite a bit faster.
Jay McCanless
Got you. And then the next question I had, incentives into the quarter just under 10%. Have -- thus far in the quarter, have you had to move the incentive level above that to keep your sales pace?
Jed Dolson
We've -- this is Jed, Jay. We've seen a little bit of pickup with the mortgage rates. They got really nasty at the end of the quarter, and they backed off a little bit. So many -- we're spending so much money as our peers are on mortgage rate buydowns. So it's those buydowns are costing a little less than they were 2 weeks ago.
Jay McCanless
Got you. And then the last one for me, just any commentary on Atlanta. I know I asked about it last quarter, seeing a little bit of sales headwind there. Maybe talk about what you saw this quarter and how you're all thinking about the end of the year for Atlanta?
Jed Dolson
Yes. This is Jed again, Jay. I'll answer it. Atlanta and then North Dallas as well. The areas where we had a heavy tech cultural buyer are challenging right now. That middle market from, say, $500,000 to $800,000 is very soft. We're very pleased with the results under $500,000. We're pleased with our brands that are executing $900,000 and above. That $500,000 to $800,000 range, which the majority of Atlanta falls into, it's a challenge right now. I think Toll Brothers mentioned it on their call. It's just a tough market.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Alex Rygiel with Texas Capital Bank.
Alexander Rygiel
Really nice quarter in a difficult market. Could you talk a little bit more about what you're seeing in Houston and how that's progressing over the last 6 months since you opened?
Jed Dolson
Yes. This is Jed. I mean, Houston is a small market for us at this point in time. We have one community open in Houston. We'll have 2 more at the end of next year. So we're not a good barometer for the Houston market, but we're pleased with just the overall results of Houston. It's a blue-collar industrial town. We're selling very affordable houses, and we think we're going to do well there long term, just like we have in Dallas.
James Brickman
This is Jim. When you get down to land spend, that's one market we're looking at very cautiously though. It doesn't underwrite. We're not going to expand just to generate revenue.
Alexander Rygiel
Makes sense. And then transitioning over to cycle times, they've improved a lot and probably industry-leading right now. Do you see more opportunities for improvement? And then sort of a second question is, do you see any opportunities to kind of value engineer your homes to take some cost out?
James Brickman
Let me answer that first, Jed. And we don't see a lot of cycle time improving a lot. Matter of fact, we're seeing the first sign of immigration headwinds where we're seeing labor constraints, particularly in Austin. We've had -- there's been a lot of increased activity in masonry, electrical, drywall that's putting cost pressures that we haven't seen for the first time before -- framers. And it's interesting because these are -- these undocumented workers that are being picked up. It's not like there's a replacement workforce, even though the wage is well above minimum wage. So I think that, that has bottomed, and we're not going to see a lot of improvement in either value engineering or the labor side of our business.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Gilbert with BTIG.
Ryan Gilbert
I had a question on absorption, and I appreciate the breakout that you gave between Trophy Signature and the rest of the business. And when we were going into the quarter, I think we expected the continued mix shift towards Trophy Signature to drive more -- or I guess, to drive positive absorption growth rather than the slight absorption decline that we saw even in a weaker market.
But it sounded like just based on your commentary, like the Trophy Signature business sold pretty well throughout the quarter. So I'm wondering if you could compare the year-over-year change in absorption between what you saw in Trophy Signature versus the other builders. I'm just wondering if there was just a much deeper decline in absorption for the move-up builders than Trophy.
Jed Dolson
Ryan, I'll take this. It's Jed. I think you kind of answered the question. The decline in Trophy absorption was less than the decline in the other parts of our business. That $500,000 to $800,000 part of our market, that's where we really saw huge declines in sales.
Jeffery Cox
And this is Jeff. I'll just add on to that. The decline that Jed's referring to is just the quarter-over-quarter decline. If you look year-over-year, Trophy's actually increased its sales pace from 4.7 last year to 5.2. So they had an 11% increase in their pace. The really challenging areas that we're seeing are more with the second, third move-up buyers that Jed mentioned earlier. We saw more declines there year-over-year, with Trophy really helping to kind of carry the torch [ to a much higher price. ]
Ryan Gilbert
Okay. Got it. And is that -- I guess, is there a -- are you just able to offer better incentives or more incentives on Trophy? Or are those second and third move-up buyers having trouble selling their existing home and that's why they don't want to acquire the new home or just sentiment issues? Just would be curious on any additional details you could provide.
Jed Dolson
Yes, we're just seeing the suburban -- we're just seeing the suburban second and third time move-up buyer, especially the cultural buyer just really frozen right now. So like I've previously mentioned, over $900,000, we're very happy with. Under $500,000 and really under $400,000 where we're really just hitting the entry-level buyer, we're very pleased with how that business is going in this very tough environment. We're just -- it's limited lot supply at that $500,000 to $800,000, and we're just going to -- we don't want to burn through our lots at the sake of lower margins, at the expense of lower margins.
Operator
There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Jim Brickman, CEO, for closing remarks.
James Brickman
Thank you for everybody for attending our phone call. We would encourage anybody that wants to visit us in Dallas to see our communities because we think that's a big differentiator. We really look at our business different than our peers. And if we took you on a tour, I think you'd see that firsthand. So hopefully, you'll come visit us. Thank you.
Operator
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。











