tradingkey.logo
搜索

ZachXBT accuses Western European institution of hiding $133M crypto theft

Cryptopolitan2026年11月3日 11:55
facebooktwitterlinkedin

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT noted Tuesday that the still undisclosed crypto loss at an unnamed Western European institution has climbed past $133 million, up from the $106 million figure he cited one day earlier.

ZachXBT, who has previously forced disclosures after going public with crypto breaches, is now alleging that the affected EU entity is concealing the breach rather than reporting it to EU authorities.

Is an EU bank hiding a crypto hack?

ZachXBT wrote on his Telegram channel early Tuesday that “My working theory is a large financial institution in Western Europe was exploited and it’s currently being covered up.” 

The blockchain investigator noted that the loss estimate is now up to $133 million after another $27 million in withdrawals were processed through centralized exchanges. ZachXBT also noted that the withdrawals have continued even after his initial Monday disclosure.

Despite multiple flags of the incident, the victim has gone unnamed. The cover-up claim has not been independently verified either. 

ZachXBT did not suspect North Korea’s Lazarus Group involvement, noting that the laundering pattern did not resemble routes used by the notorious unit implicated in many of the largest breaches to hit the crypto industry.

Notably, ZachXBT noted that more than $30 million of the funds suspected of being stolen would have fallen within the EU’s freeze net if the incident had been reported. 

Three exchanges drained in a day

Analytics firm Bitquery tracked $108.8 million linked to the incident on-chain, citing transfers that started Sunday, November 1, from Kraken, Crypto.com and OKX accounts and over roughly 21 hours.

Loss climbs to $133M as ZachXBT accuses European institution of crypto theft cover-up
How stolen exchange funds were drained, scattered, converted and hidden. Source: Bitquery on-chain analysis

Bitquery noted that most of the money moved as USDC to 15 wallets, 11 of which those same exchanges had paid before the theft. 

That detail led Bitquery to conclude the attacker held the victim’s keys and exchange logins. The working theory is that the attacker has compromised the owner’s devices, or at least someone on the victim’s team. 

Eight of the compromised wallets were Trust Wallet smart accounts. Bitquery has stressed that the incident does not indicate a flaw in the Trust Wallet app.

After the theft, the funds were quickly moved from freezable to unfreezable assets. They exchanged roughly $62.98 million in stablecoins into 27,553 ETH through UniswapX over about four hours. 

From there, the funds were routed into Monero (XMR) and across bridges. 

About $78.3 million still sat on Ethereum in attacker-linked wallets as of 13:47 UTC on November 2, Bitquery said. The firm said the attacker’s wallet still holds $3.74 million in USDC. That’s money that Circle can still freeze.

Loss climbs to $133M as ZachXBT accuses European institution of crypto theft cover-up
Where the money sits now. Source: Bitquery on-chain analysis

Why a bank victim would land differently

ZachXBT’s theory points at a category of firm that only recently joined the market. European banks spent 2026 moving into crypto under the bloc’s Markets in Crypto-Assets rules, and lenders now make up close to 23% of the crypto-asset service providers on the EU’s MiCA register as of September. 

Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest lender, was targeting MiCA approval for digital-asset custody.

Cryptopolitan’s earlier report on the $106 million drain noted the same pattern across the Binance and Bitget hacks: attackers convert stablecoins into Ether and privacy coins before Circle or Tether can act.

The disclosure question

The cover-up accusation matters most if the victim is a financial entity. Under the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), in force since January 17, 2025, financial firms including crypto-asset service providers must flag and report major ICT-related incidents to supervisors through a first alert, a follow-up update and a closing report, according to France’s markets regulator, the AMF.

ZachXBT’s point is that the delay carried a direct cost. Without disclosure, he argues, roughly $30 million flowed out of reach that authorities could have locked. 

Whether any DORA-covered entity is involved is unconfirmed, and no regulator has named a victim.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

免责声明:本网站提供的信息仅供教育和参考之用,不应视为财务或投资建议。

推荐文章

tradingkey.logo
风险提示:我们的网站和移动应用程序仅提供关于某些投资产品的一般信息。Finsights 不提供财务建议或对任何投资产品的推荐,且提供此类信息不应被解释为 Finsights 提供财务建议或推荐。
投资产品存在重大投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金,且可能并不适合所有人。投资产品的过去表现并不代表其未来表现。
Finsights 可能允许第三方广告商或关联公司在我们的网站或移动应用程序的任何部分放置或投放广告,并可能根据您与广告的互动情况获得报酬。
© 版权所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版权所有