การประชุมแถลงผลประกอบการไตรมาส 3 ปี 2026 ของ FCPT: การเข้าซื้อกิจการสูงสุดเป็นประวัติการณ์และการซื้อหุ้นคืนมูลค่า 100 ล้านดอลลาร์

ประเด็นสำคัญ

• FFO ต่อหุ้นในไตรมาส 3 อยู่ที่ 0.46 ดอลลาร์ เพิ่มขึ้น 2.9% เมื่อเทียบรายปี ขณะที่รายได้ค่าเช่าที่เป็นเงินสดเพิ่มขึ้น 13.7% สู่ระดับ 75.2 ล้านดอลลาร์
• FCPT ได้เข้าซื้ออสังหาริมทรัพย์ 120 แห่ง มูลค่า 326 ล้านดอลลาร์ในระหว่างไตรมาส ด้วยอัตราผลตอบแทนการลงทุนสุทธิจากการเก็บเงินสด (Cash cap rate) ที่ 6.6% และอัตราผลตอบแทน GAAP ที่ 7.1% ทำให้การเข้าซื้อกิจการตั้งแต่ต้นปีจนถึงปัจจุบัน (YTD) สูงเป็นประวัติการณ์ที่ 410 ล้านดอลลาร์
• อัตราการเช่าพื้นที่อยู่ที่ 99.5% ขณะที่ FCPT เก็บค่าเช่าฐานของไตรมาส 3 ได้ถึง 99.7% และอัตราส่วนความสามารถในการจ่ายค่าเช่า (Rent coverage) อยู่ที่ 5.3 เท่าสำหรับพอร์ตการลงทุนส่วนใหญ่ที่รายงานข้อมูล
• Darden ได้ขยายสัญญาเช่าร้าน Olive Garden และ LongHorn Steakhouse ที่จะครบกำหนดในปี 2027 ออกไปทั้งหมด 100% รวมถึงสัญญาเช่าบางส่วนที่จะครบกำหนดในปี 2028 โดยไม่มีการลดค่าเช่าหรือการสนับสนุนเงินทุนจาก FCPT
• คณะกรรมการอนุมัติโครงการซื้อหุ้นคืนวงเงิน 100 ล้านดอลลาร์เป็นครั้งแรกของ FCPT โดยผู้บริหารระบุว่าการซื้อหุ้นคืนจะพิจารณาจากมูลค่าหุ้นเป็นสำคัญ และมีแนวโน้มที่จะกลายเป็นจุดเน้นหลักในการจัดสรรเงินทุนในระยะสั้น
• FCPT ยืนยันคาดการณ์ค่าใช้จ่ายในการบริหารจัดการที่เป็นเงินสด (Cash G&A) สำหรับปี 2026 ที่ 19.2 ล้านดอลลาร์ถึง 19.7 ล้านดอลลาร์ และคาดว่าผลลัพธ์จะใกล้เคียงกับขอบล่างของช่วงดังกล่าว

ข้อมูลทางการเงินที่สำคัญ

ผลการดำเนินงานทางธุรกิจและการปฏิบัติงาน

กลุ่มค้าปลีกทางการแพทย์เป็นตัวขับเคลื่อนกิจกรรมการลงทุนในไตรมาส 3 ผ่านการเข้าซื้ออสังหาริมทรัพย์ Mission Pet Health จำนวน 102 แห่ง นอกจากนี้ FCPT ยังทำธุรกรรมสำเร็จในกลุ่มร้านอาหาร บริการยานยนต์ และภาคส่วนอื่น ๆ รวมถึงอสังหาริมทรัพย์ D&W Grocery แห่งแรก และโรงงานอุตสาหกรรมเบาของ Drilling Tools International

การกระจายความเสี่ยงของพอร์ตการลงทุนยังคงดำเนินต่อไป โดย Darden คิดเป็น 40% ของรายได้ค่าเช่าที่เป็นเงินสด ขณะที่ 42% มาจากภาคส่วนนอกเหนือจากร้านอาหารแบบแคชชวลไดนิง (Casual Dining) ทั้งนี้ ค้าปลีกทางการแพทย์คิดเป็น 16%, บริการยานยนต์ 13% และร้านอาหารบริการด่วน (Quick-service restaurants) 10%

ผู้บริหารเปิดเผยว่า อสังหาริมทรัพย์ Mission Pet Health มีอัตราส่วนความสามารถในการจ่ายค่าเช่าสูงกว่า 6 เท่า แบรนด์ร้านอาหารหลัก 3 แบรนด์ของ FCPT ยังรายงานการเติบโตของยอดขายเมื่อเร็ว ๆ นี้ โดย Olive Garden เพิ่มขึ้น 1%, LongHorn Steakhouse เพิ่มขึ้น 6.8% และ Chili’s เพิ่มขึ้น 10.1%

ผลการให้เช่ายังคงแข็งแกร่ง FCPT ได้ขยายสัญญาเช่า 39 จาก 43 ฉบับที่จะครบกำหนดในปี 2026 ผ่านการใช้สิทธิ การทำสัญญาใหม่ หรือการแก้ไขสัญญา โดยอสังหาริมทรัพย์ที่เหลืออีก 4 แห่งคิดเป็นสัดส่วนน้อยกว่า 0.2% ของค่าเช่าฐานปรับเป็นรายปี

ด้านการระดมทุน FCPT ได้ปิดดีลเงินกู้ระยะยาวใหม่มูลค่า 600 ล้านดอลลาร์ตั้งแต่เดือนเมษายน ซึ่งคิดเป็นหนี้สินเพิ่มเติม 410 ล้านดอลลาร์ เกือบ 40% ของงบการเงินได้รับการจัดตั้งหรือขยายระยะเวลาออกไปเป็น 5 ถึง 7 ปี โดยมีอัตราดอกเบี้ยหน้าตั๋ว (Coupon) อยู่ระหว่าง 4% ถึงต่ำกว่า 5% นอกจากนี้ บริษัทจะมีวงเงินสินเชื่อหมุนเวียนจำนวน 350 ล้านดอลลาร์ที่ยังไม่ได้เบิกใช้เต็มจำนวน

FCPT เริ่มจ่ายเงินปันผลเป็นรายเดือนในเดือนสิงหาคม และต่อมาได้ปรับเพิ่มเงินปันผลประจำไตรมาสที่ 4 ขึ้น 3.5%

แนวทางการดำเนินงานจากผู้บริหาร

FCPT ยืนยันคาดการณ์ค่าใช้จ่ายในการบริหารจัดการที่เป็นเงินสดสำหรับปี 2026 ที่ 19.2 ล้านดอลลาร์ถึง 19.7 ล้านดอลลาร์ โดยผู้บริหารคาดว่าผลลัพธ์จะใกล้เคียงกับขอบล่างของช่วงดังกล่าว

บริษัทไม่ได้ให้แนวทางการคาดการณ์เกี่ยวกับการเข้าซื้อกิจการ โดยผู้บริหารระบุว่ากิจกรรมการลงทุนจะยังคงขึ้นอยู่กับว่าผลตอบแทนจากการเข้าซื้อกิจการสูงกว่าต้นทุนเงินทุนของ FCPT หรือไม่

FCPT มีแผนจะชำระคืนตั๋วเงินชนิดเสนอขายแบบเฉพาะเจาะจง (Private note) มูลค่า 50 ล้านดอลลาร์ที่จะครบกำหนดในเดือนธันวาคม โดยใช้เงินกู้ระยะยาวที่ยังไม่ได้เบิกใช้อีก 40 ล้านดอลลาร์และเงินสดในมือ ทั้งนี้ หากไม่รวมตั๋วเงินดังกล่าว จะมีหนี้สินเพียง 75 ล้านดอลลาร์ หรือน้อยกว่า 5% ของหนี้สินทั้งหมด ที่จะครบกำหนดก่อนเดือนกุมภาพันธ์ 2028

ความเสี่ยงและปัจจัยที่ต้องติดตาม

ผู้บริหารกล่าวว่า อัตราผลตอบแทนการลงทุนในอสังหาริมทรัพย์ภายนอก (Cap rate) โดยทั่วไปค่อนข้างต่ำเกินไปเมื่อเทียบกับต้นทุนเงินทุนของ FCPT ส่งผลให้ส่วนต่าง (Spread) แคบหรือเป็นลบสำหรับโครงการลงทุนที่ได้มาตรฐานคุณภาพของบริษัท แม้ Cap rate จะปรับตัวสูงขึ้น แต่ก็ยังไม่เพียงพอที่จะชดเชยการปรับราคาของต้นทุนตราสารหนี้และส่วนของผู้ถือหุ้น

ระดับหนี้สินอยู่ใกล้ขอบบนของช่วงเป้าหมายที่ FCPT กำหนดไว้ที่ 5.0 ถึง 6.0 เท่า ผู้บริหารระบุว่าการขายสินทรัพย์ การร่วมทุน (Joint venture) และกระแสเงินสดที่เกิดขึ้นภายในบริษัท เป็นแหล่งเงินทุนที่มีศักยภาพในการลดระดับหนี้สินหรือนำมาใช้ซื้อหุ้นคืน

ผลประกอบการไตรมาส 3 รวมค่าใช้จ่ายประมาณ 100,000 ดอลลาร์จากธุรกรรมที่ยกเลิกไป และค่าใช้จ่ายย้อนหลังภาษีรัฐโอคลาโฮมาซึ่งเกิดขึ้นเพียงครั้งเดียวอีกประมาณ 100,000 ดอลลาร์ รวมถึงมีการบันทึกค่าใช้จ่ายเกี่ยวกับวงเงินสินเชื่อบางส่วนในระหว่างไตรมาสด้วย

แม้ว่า 85% ของหนี้สินจะเป็นอัตราดอกเบี้ยคงที่ ณ วันที่ 30 กันยายน แต่ผู้บริหารยอมรับว่าต้นทุนทางการเงินในปัจจุบันอาจทำให้การเข้าซื้อกิจการเพิ่มเติมมีความน่าสนใจลดลง นอกจากนี้ FCPT ยังคงมีสิทธิในการระงับหรือยกเลิกโครงการซื้อหุ้นคืนได้ตลอดเวลา

ประเด็นสำคัญจากการถาม-ตอบกับนักวิเคราะห์

• การต่อสัญญาเช่าของ Darden: ผู้บริหารชี้แจงว่าการขยายสัญญาเช่าเป็นการใช้สิทธิตามเงื่อนไขสัญญาเดิม ไม่ใช่การเจรจาเหมาพอร์ต ทั้งนี้ Darden ได้ประเมินอสังหาริมทรัพย์แต่ละแห่งเป็นรายกรณี และ FCPT ไม่ได้ให้การลดค่าเช่าหรือสนับสนุนเงินทุนแต่อย่างใด
• การซื้อหุ้นคืน: ผู้บริหารระบุว่าการซื้อหุ้นคืนอาจเริ่มต้นขึ้นในระยะสั้น และคาดว่าการซื้อหุ้นคืนจะเป็นจุดเน้นหลักในระยะถัดไป ทั้งนี้ขึ้นอยู่กับมูลค่าหุ้นและการเปรียบเทียบกับการเข้าซื้อกิจการ การลดหนี้สิน และการรักษาความคล่องตัวทางการเงิน
• การขายสินทรัพย์และการร่วมทุน: FCPT ได้รับข้อเสนอขอซื้ออสังหาริมทรัพย์รายแห่งเข้ามาอย่างสม่ำเสมอ ผู้บริหารกล่าวว่าการขายสินทรัพย์อาจเสร็จสิ้นในระยะสั้น ขณะที่การร่วมทุนที่มีศักยภาพอาจเกี่ยวข้องกับการโอนหรือขายสินทรัพย์ให้แก่พันธมิตรในตลาดนอกระบบ (Private market) และนำเงินที่ได้ไปใช้ในการซื้อหุ้นคืนที่ช่วยเพิ่มมูลค่า (Accretive repurchases) โดยยังไม่มีธุรกรรมใดที่ได้ข้อสรุปขั้นสุดท้าย
• สภาวะการเข้าซื้อกิจการ: FCPT ได้ปรับลดข้อเสนอการเข้าซื้อกิจการในท่อส่งอย่างจริงจังหลังจากธุรกรรม Mission Pet Health โดยผู้บริหารยังคงประเมินการเข้าซื้อกิจการเชิงกลยุทธ์ที่คัดสรรแล้วอย่างต่อเนื่อง แต่กล่าวว่าราคาของผู้ขายยังไม่ได้ปรับลงมากพอที่จะชดเชยต้นทุนเงินทุนที่สูงขึ้น
• การจัดวางตำแหน่งในระยะยาว: ผู้บริหารระบุว่าการเข้าซื้อกิจการ Mission Pet Health การดำเนินการเกี่ยวกับงบการเงิน และการควบคุมค่าใช้จ่ายส่วนกลางของบริษัทอย่างเข้มงวด ช่วยให้ FCPT มีตำแหน่งที่แข็งแกร่งสำหรับปี 2027 และ 2028 ทั้งนี้ เป็นมุมมองเชิงคุณภาพของผู้บริหาร ไม่ใช่แนวทางคาดการณ์ผลกำไรอย่างเป็นทางการ
• สัดส่วนความเสี่ยงใน Wendy’s: ผู้บริหารระบุว่าสัดส่วนความเสี่ยงของ FCPT ใน Wendy’s ไม่มีนัยสำคัญ โดยข้อสังเกตคือบริษัทเป็นเจ้าของอสังหาริมทรัพย์ดังกล่าวเพียงไม่กี่แห่งเท่านั้น

ถอดความการประชุมผลประกอบการฉบับเต็ม

บทถอดเสียงฉบับเต็มของการประชุมทางโทรศัพท์ผลประกอบการ

คำชี้แจงจากฝ่ายบริหาร

Operator

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to Four Corners Property Trust Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now hand the conference over to Patrick Wernig, CFO. Please go ahead.

Patrick Wernig

Thank you, Lucas. During the course of this call, we will make forward-looking statements, which are based on our beliefs and assumptions. Actual results will be affected by known and unknown factors that are beyond our control or our ability to predict. Our assumptions are not a guarantee of future performance and some will prove to be incorrect. For a more detailed description of some potential risks, please refer to our SEC filings, which can be found at fcpt.com. All the information presented on the call is current as of today, October 29, 2026. In addition, reconciliation to non-GAAP financial measures presented on this call, such as FFO and AFFO, can be found in the company's supplemental report.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Bill.

William Lenehan

Good morning, and apologies for the technical difficulties. Following my initial remarks on our Q3 results and the state of the market, Patrick will comment on our investment activities for the quarter and current capital position. 2026 has been a banner year for FCPT. Year-to-date, we have acquired a record volume of $410 million of properties at a blended 6.6% cash cap rate and 7.2% GAAP cap rate. Over the past 12 months, we've acquired $505 million of properties. Despite the record volume for FCPT, we have remained highly consistent with the investment characteristics that have long defined FCPT strategy, namely, low basis properties, conservative rents, strong store level profitability and leading tenant operators. We fully funded the volume this quarter with 2 recently closed term loans that feature coupons in the mid-4% to low 5% range, utilizing our debt capacity generating spreads of over 200 basis points as compared to historic investment yields. We also updated our dividend policy to monthly payments beginning in August and subsequently increased the dividend by 3.5% for the fourth quarter.

Finally, we were excited to announce a few weeks ago that Darden extended 100% of all Olive Garden LongHorn leases maturing in 2027, along with the early extension of a handful of 2028 lease maturities. These properties represent the first extension decision by Darden since FCPT spin-off back in 2015. We note that the extensions do not require rent reductions or capital contributions from FCPT, and Darden's rents will continue to increase by 1.5% annually. To clarify, these are individual leases where the tenant made the decision in each and every case to extend under contractual terms. We also note that we've continued to significantly diversify. Darden is now just 40% of cash rent and 42% of our rents come from sectors outside of casual dining. This includes medical retail now at 16%, automotive service at 13% and quick service at 10%.

Now turning to the current acquisition environment, which has changed a great deal in recent months. Investors consistently ask us how this will impact our pipeline efforts. Our answer is that since inception, FCPT has been consistent in modulating acquisitions relative to our cost of capital. This happened most recently when rates rose in 2023. At that point, rising rates made it difficult to invest accretively. And so we subsequently stopped nearly all acquisitions and aggressively moderated additions to our pipeline from late '23 through mid-'24. Basically, we didn't buy anything. Once our cost of capital improved, we hit the gas with vigor and subsequently invested nearly $1 billion in new accretive real estate investments from 2024 through today.

Capital allocation discipline is built into how we operate. We do not provide acquisition guidance. Our team's incentives are not tied to volume. This alignment lets us grow when it's accretive and stay patient when it isn't. It's times like these when having clear rental frameworks designed in nonturbulent times makes all the difference to investors. Other companies may say they will modulate guidance in the face of weakening spreads, but we actually have an established track record of pausing investments. Said simply and to be clear, FCPT's management will not sacrifice our shareholders' interest to simply pursue scale. As for the state of the company in this turbulent environment, we believe that we are very well positioned to weather continued macro headwinds. First, our granular acquisition strategy has created a highly fungible portfolio among the lowest per property value at risk within our industry. Our lease renewal rates are very high. Occupancy remains well over 99% and our rent coverage in Q3 was 5.3x for the majority of our portfolio that reports this figure. Our rent coverage remains best coverage within our industry and what we believe is a reflection of our conservative and analytical underwriting.

Second, our 3 core restaurant brands, Olive Garden, LongHorn and Chili's continue to outperform their peers and grew sales in the most recent quarter by 1%, 6.8% and 10.1%, respectively. The value proposition these restaurant brands offer their customers is tremendous, and they have shown through consistent historical growth in many different macroeconomic cycles. Additionally, our Mission Pet health properties have coverage levels above 6x. This is the exact type of portfolio you would want in a turbulent backdrop. Third, we have very limited credit loss over our 11-year history. That result isn't an accident. We are aligned with leading operators in our chosen sectors and avoid experience net lease sectors and over-rented properties. We try to keep it simple by acquiring low basis fungible properties in what we believe are e-commerce resistant sectors.

The last point I'd like to touch on is yesterday's announcement of our inaugural share repurchase program. Let me go into some detail here on how we are thinking about share repurchases. One of our long-term mental models is our heat meter and the green, yellow and red zones. In FCPT's history, there have just been a handful of times of short-lived red zone windows over the last decade. At the spin during COVID were the 2 prominent ones, where share repurchases would have made true economic sense. We believe the current landscape presents the best opportunity for FCPT share repurchases since our company was founded. As such, our Board has authorized a $100 million share repurchase program. And if conditions can meet our thresholds, then we will seek to utilize it. So let me trace the steps of how we think about this, which is influenced by the writing of Michael Mauboussin on capital allocation. The first decision is whether there are property acquisitions that clearly exceed our cost of capital. Because we are very analytical in assessing the quality of the properties we buy, we can do this step without quality creep. This is where we have been as a company for a significant majority of our existence, but not today. Perhaps cap rates will follow interest rates with a lag. But as of today, we think external cap rates are generally too low and in most instances, investment spreads will be thin to negative for the investments that meet our high-quality thresholds we hold ourselves to. We next make sure we are conservatively levered. We want to make sure our balance sheet is in great shape. Pat has done a terrific job here. We have a few near-term maturities, a largely fixed rate structure, and we remain within our modest target leverage range. Then we make a determination of whether we believe our stock represents a compelling investment opportunity. By this, I mean below where we believe our intrinsic value is. In the final check, we compare the risk-adjusted returns of new acquisitions, debt reduction, liquidity preservation and share repurchases. FCPT has always been price disciplined in where we issue new shares, and this is in an exact same vein, we will seek to be very price disciplined when we buy back shares. We will run this analysis every time we repurchase stock in the market to confirm these conditions are met. It is also worth noting that our program does not require us to buy a certain number of shares and allows us to suspend or terminate the program at any time, i.e., we will be valuation sensitive. Given the lack of tenant issues and our strong confidence in the portfolio, we view FCPT's current stock price as a very compelling investment today. I note that it's public that I personally purchased FCPT stock recently. This does not affect a theoretical exercise for me.

Before handing it back over to Pat, I want to offer a sincere gratitude to Josh Zhang for his contributions to FCPT. Josh joined us way back in 2016 and was instrumental in building our platform. Josh will be leaving FCPT in Q4 to take a personal sabbatical before exploring an entrepreneurial opportunity. He remains a big fan of FCPT as we are of him and is another proud member of our alumni base. We wish him the absolute best. I know I speak for myself, Patrick, the rest of the company, the Board, when I say it's been a pleasure getting to know him professionally and personally. Wherever he ends up, they'll be extremely lucky to have him. Over to you, Patrick.

Patrick Wernig

Thanks, Will. Very well said, and I couldn't agree more. Josh has been a close colleague for a decade and left [ his mark ] FCPT. We're very grateful for his meaningful efforts, which helped us evolve from startup to a seasoned net lease investment vehicle.

Now I'll shift to a review of the Q3 acquisition activity before touching on our balance sheet. In Q3, we acquired 120 properties with a weighted-average lease term of 10 years of $326 million at a 6.6% cash cap rate or 7.1% GAAP cap rate. This quarter was weighted towards medical retail with the previously announced acquisition of 102 Mission Pet Health properties. We also continue to source and execute our regular way investment pipelines in restaurants, automotive service, medical retail and other sectors across 14 distinct transactions in Q3. Those investments included new subsectors for our platform with acquisitions of the D&W Grocery property and the Drilling Tools International light manufacturing facility. In both cases, we've been monitoring these sectors for years and have been waiting for the right opportunities with real estate, credit and pricing quality to fit FCPT standards and investment profile. We'll continue to evaluate investments in these subsectors and expect that over time, we will expand our opportunity set as we build domain expertise.

I note that we did end up killing a handful of deals this quarter as we got more selective or ran into issues during due diligence that we thought would impact the long-term economics. That results in net deal cost of around $100,000, which hits AFFO. We don't [indiscernible] up deals, but are more focused on avoiding long-term problems and deals that don't meet our return thresholds.

Before I move on from acquisitions, I'd like to commend our investment and legal teams as well as our accounting and property management teams who ran an effective and efficient diligence process and integrated more properties in Q3 than we have historically done in the full year, really speaks to the strength of the platform and the capacity we've built at FCPT.

Now over to the balance sheet. As Bill highlighted, since April, we've closed on a total of $600 million of new term loans, which represents an incremental $410 million of debt with nearly 40% of our balance sheet put in place or extended 5 to 7 years, 4% to below 5% coupons. $40 million remains undrawn on the $400 million term loan, which we intend to fund by the end of the year. Additionally, we are able to lower term loan spreads by 5 to 10 basis points annually on $800 million of outstanding loans for annual savings of approximately $450,000. We are fully undrawn on our $350 million revolver and leverage for the Q3 annualized period was 6x. Our stated leverage range remains 5 to 6x and on a run rate basis, we remain a bit below that 6x upper bound of the range.

On our debt maturity schedule, we just had a $50 million private note coming due in December, which is about 3% of our total outstanding debt. We plan to repay that private note at the maturity date. We earmarked funds to do so. Principally, we expect to address the maturity with $40 million remaining undrawn term loan and cash on hand. Excluding the December note, we have just $75 million or less than 5% of our total debt coming due prior to February 2028. Our staggered debt maturity schedule is specifically designed to avoid facing a significant refinancing loss in any given year. Looking at the landscape today, a great benefit to have very minimal refinancing headwinds. In the same vein, we have very little floating rate exposure with 85% of our debt balance fixed as of 9/30. We included a detailed hedging schedule in our supplemental that also has the lock rate on our term loan, which is currently 3.1%.

Now I'd like to go through a few earnings highlights for the quarter. Q3 cash rental income was $75.2 million, representing 13.7% growth versus prior year. Annualized cash base rent for leases in place as of quarter end was $292.8 million, and our weighted-average 5-year annual cash rent escalator is 1.6%.

Cash G&A expense was $4.7 million for the quarter, representing 6.3% of cash rental income compared to 6.5% for the prior year. This improvement in operating leverage illustrates our continued efforts at achieving efficient growth and the benefits of our rising scale. Overall, Q3 FFO per share was $0.46, representing 2.9% growth versus prior year, a bit of a noisy quarter versus our usual results because of the significant acquisition volume and debt refinancing. We also recognized a onetime catch-up charge from the disputed state tax assessed several years ago and debt deal costs in several transactions that we killed during the quarter.

Our fixed charge coverage ratio remains a very healthy 4x as of quarter end. Following our Q3 results, we are affirming our cash G&A guidance for 2026 of $19.2 million to $19.7 million, but noting we expect to be at the bottom of the range. On the leasing front, the team continues to achieve remarkably strong results. We continued to make progress on the 2026 lease maturities with 39 of the 43 leases already extended by option release or amendment. The remaining 4 properties combined for less than 0.2% of ABR. We are actively negotiating with current and prospective tenants on the remaining properties in the normal course of managing our portfolio. Our occupancy remains strong at 99.5% today. We collected 99.7% of base rent for Q3.

Finally, last quarter, we did not see any material changes to our collectibility or credit reserves. Our best-in-class portfolio represents an opportunity for differentiated source of capital in the form of dispositions. In the past, we've had periods where we were more active with dispositions than not in recent years. We have a slide in our presentation posted yesterday that details our strong disposition track record. We view this as another tool to unlock value not reflected in our public valuation. Depending on pricing and execution, dispositions could be another potential capital source. We regularly receive strong reverse inquiry offers for our properties. And in this environment, we plan to be more responsive to those opportunities.

With that, I'll turn it back over to Lucas for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo.

ช่วงถาม-ตอบ

James Feldman

So congratulations on getting the first tranche of the Darden leases executed 100%. You had mentioned that those were all one-off negotiations or individual leases. Can you just talk about -- as we think about the future tranches, can you just talk about what kind of the negotiating points were to get all of those done? Is there anything as we think about how they might play out for the next tranches that were sticking points as you're negotiating? Or does this give you confidence that it will go pretty smoothly for the rest?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think negotiation is probably too strong of a word, Jamie. We had to help administer the paperwork on the extensions, but they were essentially extended -- not extension, they were extended in -- as contractually they notified us, and it's just working with them, so it doesn't all happen the last minute, just managing the paperwork. But these are very well-covered leases. These buildings have been in operation since I was a child by and large. And that's very, very similar to all the rest of our portfolio.

Patrick Wernig

I think the point we made on the individual leases is that because it's not a master lease, Darden had the opportunity to go through and evaluate each property. And so it makes us feel even better than you might think just saying that, each and every one of those cases, affirm the store as something that they wanted to remain committed to and continue to operate because they're profitable.

James Feldman

Okay. And then with leverage close to the high end of your range, assuming that the cost of capital, at least the equity markets doesn't cooperate anytime soon, how do you think about maybe getting that leverage lower to get yourself back in a position to acquire? Or do you just wait this out? Would you consider asset sales or anything else to raise capital?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think Patrick made the comments at the end of his remarks that we have very liquid currency in our buildings. There are a lot of demand for them. We get reverse inquiries on a daily basis. So we have that. We have -- we could do a joint venture, free up capital, incremental free cash flow is substantial at the scale of our business. We have a lot of avenues to create cash to reduce leverage, keep it within the range and still buy back shares.

James Feldman

But I guess in terms of like timing, how patient would you be for things to come your way before you start taking action?

William Lenehan

If by taking actions, you're referring to buying back stock, I think we would be doing that in the near term.

James Feldman

No, sorry. Raising third-party capital, you mentioned third-party [ capital ].

William Lenehan

Yes, I think the process of selling buildings is a pretty well-worn path. We've showed in our presentation, we've done that a number of times. So that can be done in the near term.

Patrick Wernig

Yes. And I think I would just point out that I hope it's not lost that the timing of when we raised that debt capital this summer was pretty fortuitous around a 5% or lower coupon rate, that's close to where the U.S. Treasury is today. So I think we timed that well. It was accretive -- highly accretive at that point. And when we think about the flexibility of having lower leverage, you have to make sure that the pricing of that debt today still makes sense, right? And so if rates have moved significantly since then, it's to our benefit that we acted when we did and didn't hold on to that capacity.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Spenser Glimcher with Green Street.

Spenser Glimcher

Look, on the transaction front, I know you guys have hit the brakes just given kind of the current environment and your cost of capital. But can you just talk about the makeup of deals you're seeing in terms of industries or credit looking to transact? And then have you seen any capitulation from sellers in terms of -- just signs of willingness to move cap rates higher?

William Lenehan

Yes. So we actively managed our pipeline down post the Mission Pet Health acquisition. We are seeing in the market that buyers are actively retrading in a substantial way. The few remaining assets we had in our pipeline have attractive cap rates. And what we're seeing today is cap rates going up, but not nearly as much as rates have moved and cost of debt has moved. So as Pat mentioned, we locked in a very substantial amount of debt before this move, which is very advantageous because incremental investments, if you're funding it with a typical mix of equity and debt, both your equity cost of capital is challenged across our industry as stock prices have gone down and your debt cost is challenged. So we are seeing higher cap rates. There are some selective things to do, which we're very active on. But by and large, it hasn't reacted enough to compensate where your sources of capital have repriced.

Spenser Glimcher

Okay. And then on the divestment front, it sounds like, obviously, you're in the early innings of this process. But can you provide some color on what types of assets would be kind of top of mind to sell? And would this be purely opportunistic? Or would there be any room for portfolio management just keeping in mind of how high rent coverage and how superior tenant health is in the portfolio?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think it's primarily driven by how attractive the use of capital is in share repurchase. So that's very price dependent, as you might be aware. But I think the way we think about Spenser is very similar to a report that Green Street did many years ago, I believe it was in 2014 on the arbitrage between the NAV of your company and the value of assets that you can sell. So I think that you guys wrote the script to that game plan.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Goldsmith with UBS.

Michael Goldsmith

Maybe we can dive a little bit deeper into just how you use? What capital you do have, right? We're talking about share repurchases. You mentioned buying down debt. And then also, it sounds like some deals were killed. So it seems like you were also willing to transact in the market. So can you just talk about at what levels do each of those look attractive and your thought process about approaching each of them?

William Lenehan

Yes. So we have seen some acquisitions that are highly strategic where we're adding an asset to already existing master lease or we're getting very attractive pricing because we know a tenant. But by and large, our focus going forward is going to be share repurchase. And for obvious reasons, we're not going to draw a line in the sand of what that value is. But we think where our stock price is right now is very attractive.

Michael Goldsmith

Got it. And then also, you did mention the potential of doing joint ventures. So I just want to get a sense of what that looks like. Is that selling assets into a venture with someone else and then freeing up some capital to do activity in the market? Or just trying to get a sense of what you would be looking to get out of a JV arrangement?

William Lenehan

Yes. I think you nailed that. We have a very well-developed acquisition apparatus. We are -- see a lot of deal flow, and there are parties that contact us weekly about partnering with us to buy net lease assets. On the private side, net lease is very, very popular right now and a number of new platforms have started and perhaps have raised more capital than they have acquisition opportunities. So I think our platform is very attractive there, and it's a very efficient way, as you mentioned, to free up capital to make accretive share repurchases.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Wes Golladay with Baird.

Wesley Golladay

Being that you have more liquid assets and equity price is more volatile than the private market, are you okay having a timing mismatch buying shares first and going a little above your target leverage level?

William Lenehan

I don't think -- I'd rather not comment on that, Wes.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Borden with BMO Capital Markets.

Eric Borden

On the reverse inquiries that you're receiving, where are the bids relative to your view of the asset value? And then are buyers still financing and closing at those levels? Are you kind of seeing the same retrading pressures you described on acquisitions?

William Lenehan

I would say that because we haven't sold assets for a couple of years now, we have a number of people who are very specifically interested in an asset that might be in their local market and might be where they have a second home. And we're reassessing those opportunities first. There's also a tax dynamic with bonus depreciation that may end on January 1. So there's a lot of activity in the market right now for assets like gas stations and car washes that benefit from bonus depreciation. We don't have a lot of those, but we do have some.

Eric Borden

Okay. Perfect. And then one for Patrick. Just could you quantify the state tax catch-up and any other nonrecurring items that affected the third quarter? And then as those costs fall away and the recent acquisitions contribute to a full quarter, how should we think about like the underlying earnings run rate heading into 2027? I'm just curious on earnings.

Patrick Wernig

Curious. Yes. So it's a very specific question, very granular. If there's a need to think on it offline on model, I'm happy to do that. I would just say that the state tax issue was unique in that the dispute started during COVID. I think the state -- the specific state, which was Oklahoma, I just took several years to review the complaint that we had about what it was. It wasn't a huge number, call it, approximately $100,000. It's nonrecurring. And the only reason we mentioned it, frankly, is because we usually don't have anything out of the norm. And so I just felt like we should highlight that with moving part of the AFFO figure.

William Lenehan

Yes. There were costs related to our credit facility that in some instances, people might assume were capitalized that were expensed, that also in the quarter. So there were, as we mentioned, a handful of things that made it a little bit more noisy in the quarter than we would have anticipated.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Rich Hightower with Barclays.

Richard Hightower

One on the share repurchases. Just help us understand the arithmetic on how you came up with the $100 million figure. It's some combination, obviously, of free cash flow. There's a lot of other moving parts as well that you've kind of gone through. But just help us understand the buildup to get to that figure.

William Lenehan

Yes, I wouldn't overthink it. It's a number that is self-determined when used, we can reauthorize it with a simple e-mail to our Board. So I wouldn't think too much about it at all.

Richard Hightower

Okay. I will not overthink it. And then secondly, back to the joint venture topic. I know it's obviously very preliminary, but since it's kind of out there for discussion now, is this something that you envision it could be more of a one-off source of equity programmatic? Are you having multiple conversations along those lines? Obviously, we've seen different flavors of the same thing sort of up and down the sector and even broadly across REITs. So just curious for what the thought is there.

William Lenehan

I think at a high level, the demand for net lease in the private market is very strong. And I think it's -- and the stock prices of the public companies are generally weak, ours included. So I think it points that having the flexibility to invest both public and private capital, at least at this moment in time is a valuable thing. And I think it's a good way to free up capital to buy back stock.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Mitch Germain with Citizens Bank.

Mitch Germain

Lots of noise around Wendy's. Is there any exposure in your portfolio with that tenant?

William Lenehan

Not meaningful.

Patrick Wernig

We have a handful of them. I think as Bill said, it's not a meaningful [indiscernible].

William Lenehan

And I would also say, Mitch, we've seen -- and I would by no means expect Wendy's to be problematic, but we have seen some very positive results with QSR brands migrating from [ Midland ] brands to very strong brands because the replacement cost and the drive-through entitlements are super valuable.

Patrick Wernig

I'd point out that to the extent it's useful to you, Mitch, we do have on our website a list of all the properties that we own in the portfolio published. So as a reminder to our investors that that's the resource and transparency that we're trying to provide.

Mitch Germain

Super helpful. I think last question. Bill, you were pretty bullish on -- I'm not asking for guidance. I want to say that, but you were pretty bullish on growth prospects, last quarter, almost frustrating. And you've almost get the full quarter benefit of that bigger Mission transaction this quarter. And I recognize there's just a lot of noise in your numbers here throughout the quarter. But how should we think about kind of the growth prospects of kind of what you've just accomplished over the course of the year and what it could mean for you guys going forward?

William Lenehan

Yes. And I really am looking out not quarter-to-quarter or intra-quarter. I'm looking out for '27 and '28. And I really believe that what we did with our balance sheet, what we did on Mission Pet Health, the -- our sort of ruthlessness on corporate overhead puts us in a really good position for '27 and '28. And if the stock price remains low, our ability to create value by buying back stock makes it even more so.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo.

James Feldman

So you had mentioned potentially JV as a source of capital. I'm just curious if you could provide more color given we're seeing more and more of that across REIT land. How do you think about a potential size? How do you think about the types of assets or types of tenants you'd want to put into those assets? And I guess with some of the Darden extensions, if that makes sense for a JV. But any other color you could provide on what that might look like would be great.

William Lenehan

Yes. I'm not going to negotiate the terms of the JV on our conference call. I would just say that what I said before, which is there's lots of demand for our high-quality portfolio, and there's a lot of value in our platform, and there's a lot of capital switching around in private markets, and we're attuned to that. But the market out there is pretty volatile, and we're certainly not at the stage -- at an advanced stage in those discussions. We will announce it when it's finalized, when and if it's finalized.

James Feldman

Okay. So it sounds like it's not a high priority. It's just an option?

William Lenehan

I wouldn't say that. Next question, operator?

Operator

We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Bill Lenehan for closing remarks.

William Lenehan

Thank you, Lucas. The first 9 months of 2026 have been unprecedented for FCPT. We exceeded our record annual investment volume by completing the largest acquisition in our history and accelerated the diversification of our portfolio. We also executed the first renewal tranche of the expiring Olive Garden LongHorn properties at a 100% renewal rate, demonstrating the durability and strength of the portfolio. And we extended nearly 40% of our balance sheet at an approximately 5% or lower coupon. Finally, we've activated our inaugural share repurchase program. Our portfolio is performing incredibly well with occupancy, rent collections, tenant coverage and leasing outcomes amongst the strongest in net lease. Our consistency has set us up with the tools that we can help create value in any environment. Our team will be at the NAREIT Atlanta Conference in November and the Jefferies Conference in December. We welcome the opportunity to meet in person. Please reach out to either Patrick or myself to coordinate schedules. Thank you.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.