NMFC 2026年第三季度业绩电话会:投资组合收益率达12%,每股净资产降至10.67美元
NMFC第三季度调整后净投资收益为每股0.26美元,覆盖每股0.25美元股息。董事会宣布第四季度继续派发每股0.25美元股息。每股净资产价值环比下降2%至10.67美元,主要受市场走势及特定信贷标的估值下调影响。投资组合平均收益率升至12%,停息贷款比例微升至1.8%。管理层表示将继续优化资本结构、推进股权变现并提升投资组合多样性。
核心要点
- 调整后净投资收益为每股0.26美元,能够覆盖9月30日支付的每股0.25美元现金股息。董事会已宣布2026年第四季度每股0.25美元的另一次股息,将于12月31日向截至12月17日登记在册的股东发放。
- 每股净资产价值(NAV)环比下降2%至10.67美元。管理层将每股0.22美元总降幅中的0.12美元归因于整体市场走势,0.10美元归因于特定信贷标的估值下调,包括insightsoftware、Deca Dental和LG。
- 投资组合的平均收益率升至12%,这在很大程度上反映了远期利率曲线的上移。管理层表示,新投资收益率超过了还款收益率。
- 在新增一笔较小头寸后,按公允价值计算的停息贷款比例上升30个基点至1.8%。在其他条件不变的情况下,第四季度初退出Convey预计将使停息贷款占公允价值的比例减少0.1%,占成本的比例减少0.6%。
- 实物支付(PIK)收益仍是关注重点。初始结构即包含PIK资产产生的PIK收益占总投资收益的15%,而修改后的PIK收益占另外的5%。
- 管理层表示,尽管并购活动低迷,但基准利率偏高、信贷利差分化扩大以及更为安全的资本结构,正在改善直接贷款领域的风险调整后机会。
关键财务数据
| 指标 | 2026年第三季度结果 | 变化或背景 |
|---|---|---|
| 总投资收益 | 6000万美元 | 较第二季度下降1.8% |
| 总净费用 | 约3600万美元 | 较第二季度下降1.4% |
| 调整后净投资收益 | 每股0.26美元 | 覆盖了第三季度每股0.25美元的股息 |
| 净资产价值 | 10亿美元 / 每股10.67美元 | 每股NAV从二季度的10.89美元有所下降 |
| 投资组合平均收益率 | 12% | 本季度有所上升 |
| 按公允价值计算的停息贷款 | 1.8% | 环比上升30个基点 |
| 净负债权益比 | 1.15倍 | 处于1.0倍–1.25倍的目标范围内 |
| 备考净负债权益比 | 1.09倍 | 反映了季度后来自Thorne和Mercer Advisors的还款 |
| 第三季度新发起贷款额 | 1000万美元 | 被4400万美元的出售和还款所抵消 |
| 总资产 | 24亿美元 | 截至9月30日 |
| 总负债 | 13亿美元 | 截至9月30日 |
| 第四季度股息 | 每股0.25美元 | 12月31日支付;股权登记日为12月17日 |
NMFC在第三季度的有效激励费率为15%,反映出在先前宣布的2027年永久降至15%之前,公司自愿减免了140万美元的费用。
业务与运营业绩
NMFC继续专注于防御性行业以及具有经常性收入、稳定利润率和持久现金流的企业。管理层强调了包括Benevis、UniTek和Novus Process Systems在内的几个大型持仓在2026年实现了两位数的盈利增长。据公司称,UniTek和Novus还受益于与电网和数据中心扩张相关的增长市场。
投资组合涵盖110家公司。约80%的投资(包括第一受偿权资产、高级贷款计划和净租赁投资)具有高级债权性质。股权头寸约占投资组合的6%。扣除高级贷款计划和净租赁基金后,前十大发行人占总公允价值的24.8%。
投资组合质量略有软化。绿色评级投资占比从第二季度的88%降至86%,而黄色评级风险敞口从10.2%升至11.7%。黄色和橙色评级头寸的加权平均估值约为面值的70%,管理层表示,这反映出NAV中已经体现了大幅去风险。
NMFC的贷款价值比(LTV)为49%。自IPO以来,该公司已在358家公司投资了106亿美元,并录得约1.01亿美元的净实现亏损。
流动性依然充裕。NMFC拥有超过20亿美元的总借贷能力,其中包括信贷额度下约7.6亿美元的可用额度(受借款基数限制)。相比之下,未出资承诺约为1.45亿美元。接近60%的未偿债务将在2029年或更晚到期。
管理层展望
管理层的战略重点是套现股权头寸、减少PIK收益并提高投资组合多样性。退出所得资金旨在重新配置到第一受偿权、现金支付型投资中,不过具体时机将取决于公司业绩和合适的交易机会。
该公司预计其最近发行的无担保债券和现有流动性能覆盖2027年到期的债务。管理层还预计将继续活跃于无担保债券市场,并继续优化负债结构以限制资产负债错配。
管理层认为直接贷款条件已变得更具吸引力。据PitchBook数据,今年迄今行业直接贷款规模下降了约28%,但目前的利差范围大致为SOFR加475个基点至SOFR加600个基点,而2025年许多交易的利差范围较窄,为SOFR加450–475个基点。
风险与关注领域
- 大盘走势和更高的折现率占季度NAV降幅的一半以上。
- 特定信贷资产的下调影响了一小部分持仓,包括insightsoftware、Deca Dental和LG。
- 由于复利效应以及一笔贷款从现金支付转为PIK,PIK收益在投资收益中的占比有所增加。
- 管理层指出,持续的通胀、供应链波动、消费者信心下降、地缘政治冲突、与AI相关的扰动以及估值差距是市场的不利因素。
- 并购活动仍低于2025年的水平,这可能会影响股权变现和投资组合轮动的时机。
- 消费弱势集中在低端市场。管理层将NMFC在宠物护理和洗车领域的风险敞口描述为具有相对防御性,同时将牙科领域的挑战描述为主要是运营层面而非消费驱动。
分析师问答要点
在被问及股权变现是否需要并购市场的全面复苏时,管理层表示,更强劲的交易市场会有所帮助,但并非必要条件。更重要的因素是底层公司的表现以及寻找能够以适当价值支持退出的机会。
关于面向消费者的医疗保健风险敞口,管理层表示宠物医疗和宠物护理业务具有一定的非必需属性,但总体呈现稳定的收入。牙科领域的挑战被描述为主要是运营层面的,需要密切关注执行情况。
管理层还表示,大型PIK收益型和股权头寸业绩的改善支持了其预期的退出时间表,并可能创造以有利价格套现这些持仓的机会。
高级贷款计划和净租赁工具收益的环比下降归因于底层变现和基金活动的正常波动,而非特定的不利事件。
业绩电话会议完整文字记录
完整财报电话会议逐字稿
管理层陈述
Operator
Good day, and welcome to the New Mountain Finance Corporation Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to John Kline, President and CEO. Please go ahead.
John Kline
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to New Mountain Finance Corporation's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. On the line with me here today are Steve Klinsky, Chairman of NMFC and CEO of New Mountain Capital; and Laura Holson, COO and Interim CFO of NMFC. Steve is going to make some introductory remarks, but before he does, I'd like to ask Laura to make some important statements regarding today's call.
Laura Holson
Thanks, John. Good morning, everyone. Before we get into the presentation, I would like to advise everyone that today's call and webcast are being recorded. Please note that they are the property of New Mountain Finance Corporation and that any unauthorized broadcast in any form is strictly prohibited. Information about the audio replay of this call is available in our November 2 earnings press release.
I would also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosure in our press release and on Pages 2 and 3 of slide presentation regarding forward-looking statements. Today's conference call and webcast may include forward-looking statements and projections, and we ask that you refer to our most recent filings with the SEC for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements and projections. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements or projections unless required to by law. All materials referenced during today's call, including the earnings press release, earnings presentation and Form 10-Q are available on our website at www.newmountainfinance.com.
At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Steve Klinsky, NMFC's Chairman, who will give some highlights beginning on Page 6 of the slide presentation. Steve?
Steven Klinsky
Thanks, Laura. It's great to be able to address you all today, both as NMFC's Chairman and as a major fellow shareholder. Adjusted net investment income for the third quarter was $0.26 per share, covering our $0.25 per share dividend that was paid in cash on September 30. Looking forward to Q4, we would like to announce a $0.25 dividend payable on December 31 to shareholders of record as of December 17.
Our net asset value per share of $10.67 and declined 2% compared to Q2, largely due to mark-to-market movement on a handful of idiosyncratic credits, particularly on some of our quoted assets. Earnings in 2026 have grown at double-digit rates at some of our biggest positions, including Benevis, UniTek and the Novus Process Systems, formerly known as Permian. UniTek and Novus are also seeing new growth markets tied to the expansion of the electric grid and data centers. We think the current environment is a good time to enter the credit markets as risk-adjusted returns and direct lending appear to be attractive compared to the narrow market spreads of past years.
As discussed in past calls, we have pledged to voluntarily and permanently reduce our fees to be more shareholder friendly. Despite all these positives, and as I've said before, I believe NMFC continues to be oversold with the stock trading at approximately 65% of book value. At these trading levels, NMFC's book value would have to depreciate nearly $345 million versus our marks as of September 30, or about 15% of our portfolio at fair value to bring book value down to where the stock trades.
At Friday's closing stock price, NMFC is paying a cash yield of 14%, roughly 6 percentage points above the average yield of the high-yield bond index and we believe the dividend is sustainable. Shareholders who have been with NMFC since its public offering have received $20.95 of total cash back versus their initial price of $13.75 per share and also have the $10.67 of book value per share today. This equates to a 9.9% annualized return since NMFC's inception or 8.9% at the current depressed stock price, all at an annualized realized total net loss rate of just 6 basis points.
This 9.9% long-term return exceeds the high-yield bond index by approximately 4.5 percentage points. Long-term loyal shareholders have received all their investment back in cash, plus 103% and assuming a hypothetical sale at the current depressed stock price. Returns made by reinvesting these past cash dividends would be in addition to this amount. I and my fellow NMC executives remain the largest shareholders of NMFC stock and our ownership position has been increasing over time.
Overall, New Mountain ownership increased from approximately 14% last year to approximately 18% of total shares outstanding as of September 30. We thank you, as always, for your friendship and ownership, and we are working diligently to serve your interest in the months and years ahead.
With that, let me turn the call over to John for more details and comments.
John Kline
Thank you, Steve. I'll begin on Page 7. Our direct lending strategy focuses on defensive sectors with sustainable tailwinds and on businesses with recurring revenue stable margins and strong cash flow across economic environments. Our strategy has been built to navigate current economic challenges like persistent inflation, supply chain volatility and weaker consumer confidence. We prioritize transparency and we seek to provide more granular disclosure of our industry niches, so investors can see exactly what we own.
Page 8 shows our long-term track record of delivering consistent, enhanced yield by minimizing credit losses and distributing virtually all of our excess income to shareholders. NMFC's loan-to-value ratio is 49%, which reflects our latest view of enterprise value at each portfolio company. We recalculate loan to value every quarter, so it reflects current market conditions.
Turning to Page 9. Our strategic priorities include monetizing equity positions, reducing PIK income and increasing position diversity. As Steve mentioned, many of our equity and pick yielding positions are performing well, and we continue to see potential catalysts for exits. We're focused on the right outcome for the portfolio, which sometimes requires patients. As opportunities materialize, our objective is to redeploy proceeds into first lien cash paying investments to improve portfolio diversification and income quality. Our liability structure remains well positioned with further opportunity in 2027 to extend near-term maturities.
On Page 10, 86% of the portfolio is rated green compared to 88% last quarter. We saw an increase in the yellow category from 10.2% to 11.7% in our yellow and orange names carry a weighted average mark of approximately $0.70, reflecting meaningful derisking already captured in the current NAV. This heat Mac migration is reflective of modest stress on certain older vintage investments which we continue to work through. We expect to make progress migrating to newer names in the upcoming quarters, which should be beneficial to overall portfolio quality.
Page 11 shows the NAV bridge. Book value per share ended the quarter at $10.67, down $0.22 from $10.89 in Q2. We of approximately $0.12 of the decline reflected broader market movements driven by higher discount rates on leveraged loan assets. While the remaining $0.10 reflected credit-specific movements in a handful of positions, including insightsoftware, Deca Dental and LG. While this is not the NAV rule we want, we do see positive catalysts on certain of these names and other discounted names in the portfolio.
Page 12 covers credit performance. Nonaccruals at fair value were 1.8%, up 30 basis points from last quarter as a very small position was added to the list. On the flip side, we exited convey early in Q4, which will reduce nonaccruals next quarter by 0.1% at fair market value and 0.6% at cost all things equal. On the right side of the page is our cumulative record since IPO, where we have invested $10.6 billion across 358 companies with net realized losses of approximately $101 million. We remain focused on recovering unrealized losses through pull to par on certain loans and through equity exits I mentioned.
I will now turn the call over to Laura to discuss the credit market environment and provide more details on the quarter.
Laura Holson
Thanks, John. Turning to Page 13. M&A activity to date in 2026 remains below 2025 levels with industry-wide direct lending volume down approximately 28% year-to-date according to PitchBook. We still believe M&A activity will pick up at some point, given the backlog of private equity exits and pressure to return capital, but the current investment environment is full of cross currents. These include conflicting macroeconomic signals around inflation, consumer health, labor markets and commodity prices, ongoing geopolitical conflicts the impact of AI and the accelerating pace of technological change and persistent valuation gaps.
While we haven't seen the meaningful pickup that we've been predicting, our deal flow has been steady, particularly in the defensive growth sectors where we focus. We continue to think that direct lending offers attractive returns and compelling enhanced yield. As a floating rate asset class, our all-in return benefits from rising base rates. At the start of 2026, the forward curve was actually predicting base rate cuts. Today, base rates have remained higher for longer, and the forward curve is now pricing in rate increases over the next 12 months.
We believe this creates a tailwind. Additionally, we're seeing what we believe is a healthy bifurcation in the market around spreads. Throughout 2025, we noted on several of our earnings calls that most direct lending deals priced at SOFR plus 450 to 475 regardless of size, sponsor or asset quality. That made for a challenging investing environment and our strategy was really focused on staying safe. Today, spreads range from SOFR plus 475 on the tight end to SOFR plus 600 on the wider end Note that this is the case even in an environment where M&A remains somewhat muted.
I'd attribute this to a more balanced supply and demand dynamic. Even as deal flow is lower, less direct lending capital is available to chase deals, particularly on the heels of recent industry-wide redemptions. We've also seen this translate into more attractive capital structures with lower leverage and tighter documentation. To summarize, we think the combination of higher base rates more discerning spreads and safer capital structures provides attractive risk-adjusted returns in direct lending.
Turning to Slide 14. Origination activity was intentionally light in the quarter as we remained fully invested. We originated $10 million of investments offset by $44 million of sales and repayments. Slide 15 shows that the average yield of NMFC's portfolio increased to 12% during the quarter largely due to the upward shift in the forward curve. Although portfolio activity was modest, yields on new investments exceeded those on repayments. We continue to believe these yields are attractive for the risk.
Turning to Slide 16. Approximately 80% of the portfolio, including first lien investments, SLPs and net lease investments is senior in nature, consistent with the prior quarter. Equity positions represent approximately 6% of the portfolio with the largest positions shown on the right side of the page.
Slide 17 highlights the diversification of our portfolio across 110 companies. Excluding investments in the SLPs and net lease funds, our top 10 single name issuers represent 24.8% of total fair value. As John mentioned earlier, increasing portfolio diversification remains an important priority, and we believe we have line of sight into further progress over the coming quarters.
I will now review our financial results, beginning on Slide 18. For the third quarter, total investment income was $60 million, down 1.8% from the prior quarter. Total net expenses were approximately $36 million, down 1.4% from the prior quarter. NMFC's effective incentive fee rate for Q3 was 15%, reflecting a voluntary waiver of $1.4 million of incentive fees ahead of the previously announced permanent reduction to 15% in 2027. Adjusted net investment income for the quarter was $0.26 per share, more than covering our third quarter dividend. For the fourth quarter, our Board has declared a dividend of $0.25 per share.
Slide 19 provides additional detail on cash and PIK income. PIK income from assets structured with PIK and originations represented 15% of total investment income. Modified PIK resulting from amendments or restructurings, represented 5% of total investment income, up slightly from the prior quarter. The increase in total PIK income as a percentage of investment income reflects PIK compounding and 1 loan moving from cash pay to PIK in the quarter.
Importantly, investments generating noncash income during the quarter are marked at a weighted average fair value of approximately 94% of par and 81% of this income is generated by names rated green on our heat map. Reducing PIK income remains a strategic priority, and we continue to focus on improving the cash paying composition of our portfolio over time.
Moving to the balance sheet on Slide 20. As of September 30, the portfolio had total assets of $2.4 billion, total liabilities of $1.3 billion and net asset value of $1 billion or $10.67 per share. Our net debt-to-equity ratio was 1.15x, within our target range of 1 to 1.25x. Shortly after quarter end, we received a few sizable repayments, namely Thorne and Mercer Advisors. Pro forma for those repayments, our statutory net debt-to-equity ratio decreased to 1.09x.
On Slide 21, we highlight our diversified financing sources and leverage profile. We have more than $2 billion of total borrowing capacity, including approximately $760 million available under our credit facilities, subject to borrowing base limitations. This capacity more than covers our approximately $145 million of unfunded commitments as well as our 2027 maturities. During the second quarter, we priced a $150 million private placement with a delayed funding date, which funded on October 1. We expect to remain active in the unsecured debt market in line with our strategic priorities.
Turning to Slide 22, we show our debt maturity schedule. As mentioned, we have already covered our 2027 maturities through our recent unsecured issuance and existing liquidity. We continue to ladder our maturities with nearly 60% of outstanding debt maturing in 2029 or later.
Lastly, Slide 23 summarizes the floating and fixed state composition of our assets and liabilities. As of September 30, 88% of the NMFC loan portfolio was floating rate and 12% was fixed rate. Our liabilities were 77% floating rate and 23% fixed rate compared to 74% floating rate last quarter. This represents an important milestone as we have now exceeded our target of more than 75% floating rate liabilities. We intend to continue optimizing our liability mix to reduce potential asset liability mismatches.
With that, I will turn the call back over to John.
John Kline
Thank you, Laura. In closing, we would like to thank all of our stakeholders for the ongoing partnership, and we look forward to speaking to you again on our fourth quarter 2026 earnings call in February.
I will now turn things back to the operator to begin Q&A. Operator?
Operator
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.
分析师问答
Robert Dodd
A couple of questions. So I mean, 1 of the things you pointed out, obviously, you're seeking monetizations on the equity, which has been a theme. And yes, it takes a while. Does -- is the market just extremely uncooperative right now? I mean, to your point, M&A activity in general is down substantially. I mean, is it -- is it realistic that we're only going to see these monetizations and rotation to income producing assets. If the market is substantively more cooperative?
Or is it just -- I mean, obviously, these are case-by-case assets, but still the market doesn't seem to be helping you out here. So is that what we need to look for that be more optimistic if the market picks up that, that monetization could actually happen otherwise sit back and be patient.
Laura Holson
I don't think it's so directly tied to the overall volume of M&A environment. Certainly, a more robust M&A environment is more constructive, of course, but it's not like there's no M&A happening right now. I think, in some of our prepared remarks, we talked about seeing steady opportunities for us in direct lending. And so I think that is a result of kind of steady M&A activity, which is not as robust as maybe we've seen in years past. I think it's most important, how the underlying companies are performing.
That's really what we've been focused on, and as Steve talked about in his remarks, we feel like those underlying companies are performing well. So I think that's a good place to start. And then we'll, obviously, as John said, I have to be a little bit patient to just find the right opportunities. But overall, we don't think that we need to wait for a prolific M&A environment in order to execute some of those strategic priorities.
Robert Dodd
Got it. Sort of related follow-on. I mean, as you point out, there's a lot of cross currents out there right now and later now seem to be on the way back up, which would be positive earnings if there's no secondary effects. When we look at the -- obviously, 1 of your larger markdowns on the credit side, this quarter was decadent. That's been a theme in the space, not just you. There's a lot of dental that's been having issues. There's a lot of veterinary and you've got exposure there as well.
Is there an issue that with how the consumer is right now mixed messages there as well. Is there an issue that there's only so much pricing power some of these businesses, be it dental or veterinary or others can pass through to a consumer but their cost structure and their interest expenses are still going through the same pressures. And so are we just going to see more and more of those kind of consumer sort of thought to be more robust businesses, but ones that have passed through the pricing power they can? Are we just going to see more and more problems on -- in that kind of segment of your and frankly other people's portfolio?
John Kline
Sure. It's a great question. And from what we see is across the consumer is a bit of weakness on the low end and strength on the higher end. In general, when we think about the consumer exposure we have in NMFC, we think it's more on the defensive side because it's not overly discretionary. When we think about PET, we have some first lien exposure to veterinarian pet and in general, we think that while there's some discretionary aspects, it's relatively stable from a top line perspective even in a weaker consumer environment. So we feel okay about that.
On the dental side, I think the issues are less consumer and more operational and so any dental exposure that we have would be very focused on making sure the operations are running as smoothly and crisply as possible. And then just more broadly, when we think about the rest of our portfolio, the only other area that I can think of where there's material consumer exposure would be car wash, which we see as being pretty low ticket, and pretty stable when we look at the best car wash platforms out there, and we think we have good exposure to that niche. So that would be the way I would answer it.
Operator
We'll move to our next question from Ethan Kaye with Lucid Capital Markets.
Ethan Kaye
You indicated there's some improving performance across some of the larger portfolio positions, which I think you just touched on. But I mean, can you kind of elaborate on that any further? And does that kind of change the pressure or like time line maybe with which you look to exit these positions?
John Kline
I would say it's supportive of the time line that we seek to exit some of these positions. So I just think, as Laura said, it's good that we have momentum in some of our larger positions, some of our pick yielding positions, some of our equity positions. And we think that will give us an opportunity to exit at a good value.
Ethan Kaye
Okay. And then I noticed there was a bit of a decline in income from the senior loan programs and the net lease. Can you just talk about maybe what drove that this quarter?
Laura Holson
Sure. Yes. I mean these vehicles generally produce pretty consistent income we find, but there is a little bit of volatility quarter-to-quarter just based on underlying realizations or activity at those funds themselves. So we would expect to see a little bit of movement quarter-over-quarter. So nothing in particular that I would call out, just normal quarter-to-quarter volatility.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] It appears there are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the conference back over to John for any additional or closing remarks.
John Kline
Great. Well, thank you, everyone, for joining our third quarter call, and we look forward to speaking to you again in the new year. Thank you.
Operator
This concludes today's call. Thank you again for your participation. You may now disconnect, and have a great day.
本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。










