多佛 (DOV) 2026年第三季度业绩电话会议:订单增长16%,业绩指引收窄上调
都福集团公布2026财年第三季度业绩,内生营收增长加速至7%,调整后每股收益为2.88美元,同比增长10%。五大业务板块订单全线上升,季度订单出货比达1.03,在手订单同比增长35%。气候与可持续技术板块以18%的内生增速领跑,自由现金流达3.83亿美元。管理层将全年业绩指引收窄至内生增长5%至6%,调整后每股收益为10.60至10.75美元。在手订单与产能扩张将为2027年提供良好预测性,近期资本配置仍偏向于股东回报。
都福集团(Dover Corporation,纽约证券交易所代码:DOV)公布,2026财年第三季度内生增长加速,订单势头广泛强劲,自由现金流有所增长。管理层收窄了全年业绩指引区间并调至先前范围的上半段,并指出在手订单增长35%是迈入2027年的关键可预测性来源。
要点速览
- 第三季度内生营收增长加速至7%,调整后每股收益同比增长10%至2.88美元。
- 五大业务板块订单均增长16%,季度订单出货比(book-to-bill ratio)达1.03。在手订单同比增长35%,其中约一半计划于2027年交付。
- 气候与可持续技术板块以18%的增速领跑,这得益于数据中心液冷换热器的强劲需求以及二氧化碳制冷系统创纪录的季度营收。
- 第三季度自由现金流达3.83亿美元,占营收的17%。今年迄今自由现金流增加7200万美元,达到7.03亿美元。
- Dover将全年指引收窄至内生增长5%–6%,调整后每股收益为10.60–10.75美元。
- 该公司在第三季度回购了超过3.3亿美元的股票,今年迄今累计回购约4亿美元。管理层表示,近期资本配置仍偏向于股东回报。
重要财务数据
| 指标 | 2026财年第三季度 / 当前状况 | 变动或背景说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 内生营收增长率 | 7% | 本季度增长加速 |
| 调整后每股收益 | $2.88 | 同比增长10% |
| 订单额 | 增长16% | 五大业务板块全线上升 |
| 季度订单出货比 | 1.03 | 订单量超过出货量 |
| 过去12个月订单出货比 | 1.08 | 过去12个月预订量增长16%,而营收增长为8% |
| 在手订单 | 同比增长35% | 约一半计划于2027年交付 |
| 第三季度自由现金流 | 3.83亿美元 | 占营收的17% |
| 今年迄今自由现金流 | 7.03亿美元 | 占营收的11%,同比增长7200万美元 |
| 今年迄今股票回购额 | 约4亿美元 | 包含第三季度的3.3亿多美元 |
| 已公布的收购承诺 | 约8000万美元 | Cloeren 与 Leistung |
| 季度末资本能力 | 超过30亿美元 | 被管理层称为可调用的干柴储备资金 |
业务与经营业绩
Dover表示,其长期趋势增长市场目前占营收的25%以上,而2024年这一比例为18%。这些市场包括能源转型与发电、二氧化碳系统、数据中心以及用于能源和航天领域的低温部件。
气候与可持续技术板块实现了18%的内生增长。各地区和终端市场对钎焊板式换热器的需求持续强劲,尤其是数据中心液冷领域。Dover正加大投资,计划到2027年将大型换热器的全球产能翻倍。
二氧化碳制冷系统创造了创纪录的季度营收。弗吉尼亚州里满(Richmond)工厂的产量有所改善,末端生产率比第二季度高出15%。该板块利润率为18%,换热器业务强劲的转化收益被二氧化碳系统、特种柜和冷藏门柜的同步扩产成本所抵消。
食品零售业务今年迄今承担了约4000万美元的相关成本,主要涉及生产投资、额外人工以及同时运营两个工厂带来的重复固定成本。Dover在本季度完成了加利福尼亚州西尔马(Sylmar)门框生产的整合。
清洁能源与加油设备板块实现了12%的内生增长。增长动能来自清洁能源部件、流体输送以及北美零售加油业务(该业务录得多年来最强劲的单季表现)。用于液化天然气(LNG)和航天发射基础设施的低温部件需求保持健康。由于扩产成本抵消了规模效益,利润率大致持平。
影像与识别板块实现2%的内生增长,主要由序列化软件的两位数增长以及稳健的标识与喷码需求推动。在经营杠杆、软件增长、区域产品组合和外汇折算的支撑下,利润率扩大了400个基点至33%。
泵与过程解决方案板块内生增长1%。人工智能及能源基础设施、一次性生物制药和工业泵业务抵消了聚合物加工设备销量的疲软。由于工业泵和精密部件的转化效率提升,加之生物制药业务占比提高,利润率上升70个基点至34%。
工程产品板块内生下降2%。航空航天和国防部件的强劲需求被欧洲车辆服务销量的下降所抵消。得益于有利的产品组合和成本控制,利润率保持稳定。
Dover继续投资于零售加油、低温部件、美国流量计、亚洲一次性生物制药部件、航天射频设备、打印机及墨水生产、特种柜和大型换热器的产能建设。许多项目预计将在2027年第一季度末投入运营。
该公司还在8月完成了对 Cloeren 的收购,并预计 Leistung 交易将在第四季度完成。Cloeren 带来了挤出模具、分流块以及超过30万平方英尺的美国制造产能。Leistung 将提供位于印度的低温部件制造能力。
管理层业绩指引
Dover 收窄了2026财年全年业绩预期,并向先前范围的上半段靠拢:
| 全年指标 | 管理层业绩指引 |
|---|---|
| 内生增长率 | 5%–6% |
| 调整后每股收益 | $10.60–$10.75 |
| 自由现金流 | 占营收的14%–16% |
| 资本支出 | 2.00亿–2.20亿美元 |
管理层预计第四季度自由现金流将进一步增加,历史上看第四季度是 Dover 现金流创收能力最强的季度。
展望2027年,管理层指出在手订单、重组节省、收购贡献、股份总数减少以及食品零售转型成本的预期下降均为支撑因素。虽然 Dover 未提供正式的2027年财务指引,但表示气候与可持续技术板块的利润率应会明显改善,预计同比改善将从第一季度开始。
风险与关注要点
- 产能限制正在拉长换热器、低温产品和部分零售加油市场的交付周期。新产能需要前期投入,且在产能利用率提升前可能会稀释利润率。
- 第四季度的出货时机部分取决于客户在12月的调拨提货情况,届时客户可能会管理其年终营运资金。
- 在生产率和固定成本摊销改善之前,食品零售业务的产能爬坡成本预计将在年底前继续上升。假设业务量得到支撑,管理层预计过渡期将在2027年第一季度末基本完成。
- Dover 已在2027年到来之前加速了部分产品的调价举措,以应对大宗商品和其他成本投入带来的风险。SWEP 的铜风险敞口已纳入供应商合同的定价机制中。
- 虽然 Dover 表示当前的在手订单能够为其投资计划提供支撑,但管理层承认,由于竞争对手也在扩大产能,数据中心需求的持续时间存在不确定性。
- 在传统的短周期业务中,可预测性仍然相对有限,这类业务通常在较短的周期内完成预订和出货。
分析师问答环节亮点
在手订单与2027年可预测性:管理层表示,由于受产能限制影响的市场的客户提早预订供应,在手订单高于正常水平。在手订单主要集中在二氧化碳系统和 SWEP 换热器上,而非传统的长周期业务。Dover 还认为,如果聚合物加工和制罐设备从当前的低迷水平复苏,将存在潜在的上行空间。
气候与可持续技术板块利润率:管理层拒绝将2027年利润率的增幅量化,但称其将非常可观。消除重复设施成本、稳定生产线、减少多余劳动力以及通过更高产量摊销固定成本,预计将带来利润率改善。
数据中心冷却产能:Dover 正提升 SWEP 主要数据中心产品线的产能,并预计未来产品组合将从中央冷却系统转向冷媒分配单元(CDU)。管理层表示,由于生产高度自动化且技术要求高,产能决策必须提前大约18个月做出。
资本配置:Dover 对补充型(bolt-on)收购持开放态度,但将维持其回报标准。管理层表示,内生项目可能产生与收购相当的营收增长,并重申近期更倾向于向股东回报资本。
零售加油周期:管理层表示,地下储罐设备的供应限制正在延长资本支出周期的持续时间。Dover 目前认为该周期可能至少持续四年,而此前预期为三年。
利率:当被问及较高的利率是否影响资本规划业务时,管理层回答称尚未看到任何影响。
业绩电话会议完整文本
完整财报电话会议逐字稿
管理层陈述
Operator
Good morning, and welcome to Dover's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Speaking today are Richard J. Tobin, President and Executive -- Chief Executive Officer; Chris Woenker, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Jack Dickens, Vice President, Investor Relations. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, this conference call is being recorded, and your participation implies consent to our recording of this call. If you do not agree with this term, please disconnect at this time. Thank you.
I would now like to turn our call over to Mr. Jack Dickens. Please go ahead, sir.
Jack Dickens
Thank you, Leslie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. An audio version of this call will be available on our website through November 12, and a replay link of the webcast will be archived for 90 days.
Our comments today will include forward-looking statements based on current expectations. Actual results and events could differ from those statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in our SEC filings. We assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements.
With that, I will turn the call over to Rich.
Richard Tobin
Thanks. Jack. Good morning, everyone. Let's get started on Slide 3. Overall, it was a solid quarter. Organic growth accelerated to 7%, led by our secular growth markets and supported by durable demand across the majority of the portfolio. Bookings were the highlight in the quarter. Orders were up 16% year-over-year, with growth in all 5 segments. Book-to-bill was 1.03 for the quarter. Our backlog is up 35% versus this time last year, which supports our confidence in the forecast and provides very good momentum heading into 2027.
Adjusted EPS was $2.88 per share, up 10% in the quarter. We remain active on the capital -- on capital deployment, announcing 2 bolt-on acquisitions that add complementary capabilities, low-cost manufacturing and geographic breadth to our businesses. We also repurchased over $330 million of our shares in the quarter. We are narrowing our full year guidance towards the upper end of the range, with organic growth of 5% to 6% and adjusted EPS and from $10.60 to $10.75 per share, representing double-digit growth consistent with our long-term algorithm.
Let's go to Slide 5. Our secular growth markets now represent over 25% of our total revenue, up from 18% in 2024. Across the top of the slide, we show our expected growth rates in each of these markets this year. In total, these markets are a material driver of our overall revenue growth in 2026, and we expect that trend to continue in 2027. We have purposely built these platforms through R&D spending and new product development in our legacy businesses as well as through targeted M&A.
Our business model is unique. It allows us to pursue a variety of high-growth business opportunities across a range of secular themes, with several of our businesses participating in more than one. We have been able to deliver this growth by proactively adding capacity in advance to the market, which has allowed us to capture leadership positions. This has been particularly important in energy transition and power generation, CO2 systems, data centers and cryogenic components serving the energy and space markets. We have continued to invest in additional capacity in 2026 behind this demand strength, some of which we will detail in a subsequent slide.
These organic and inorganic investments have delivered high returns on invested capital despite the proactive upfront investments as the result -- as a result of high growth rates and margin profiles of these sectors. These businesses are technically demanding mission-critical applications where Dover tends to win. The vast majority of our acquisition capital over the past 5 years has been deployed in these markets, and they remain our top priorities from both an organic and inorganic investment.
Going to Slide 6. This slide underscores the breadth and duration of our order book. Trailing 12-month bookings were up 16%, well ahead of revenue growth at 8, and trailing book-to-bill has climbed to 1.08. Every segment has grown bookings faster than revenue over the past 12 months. That sustained order momentum has underpinned the top line acceleration we are seeing in 2026, and it gives us confidence in our outlook going forward. Importantly, our backlog is 35% higher than it was at this point last year and is up sequentially from Q2, with roughly half scheduled to ship in 2027. That gives us a solid foundation heading into next year with revenue visibility well ahead of where we would expect to be at this point in the planning cycle.
Moving to Slide 7. Engineered Products was down 2% organically. Demand for aerospace and defense components remained strong, was more than offset by lower volumes in European vehicle services. Margin was stable on favorable mix and cost controls.
Clean Energy & Fueling grew 12% organically, with solid shipments in new orders in clean energy components, fluid transport and North American retail fueling, which posted its strongest quarter in years. Demand for our cryogenic components in LNG and space launch infrastructure remains healthy, with several recent high-profile project wins. Margin was roughly flat as volume leverage was offset by production ramp in cryogenic product lines where demand is running ahead of capacity. We're actively expanding that capacity with additional output coming online in the first quarter of 2027.
Imaging & ID grew 2% organically, led by double-digit growth in serialization software and solid performance in core marking and coding. Consumables and equipment margins expanded 400 basis points to 33%, driven by volume leverage on largely fixed cost base and software growth in consumables, favorable geographic mix and foreign currency translation.
Pumps & Process Solutions grew 1% organically, with growth in AI and energy infrastructure, single-use biopharma and industrial pumps that was partially offset by lower volumes in polymer processing equipment where quoting activity is high. Margin expanded 70 basis points to 34% and solid conversion in industrial pumps and precision components and a higher mix of biopharma revenue.
Climate & Sustainability Technologies accelerated to 18% organic growth in the quarter. Shipments and order rates in brazed plate heat exchanges remain robust across all geographies and major end markets, with notable strength in liquid cooling for data centers which is initially concentrated in the U.S., but we are now seeing meaningful acceleration in Europe and Asia. Lead times remain extended and we are actively investing to double our global capacity for large heat exchanges through 2027.
CO2 refrigeration systems posted quarterly revenue -- posted record quarterly revenue with September reaching its highest output of the year in refrigerated door cases. The investments that we have added in Richmond, Virginia facility are ramping up. Line rates exiting third quarter were 15% higher than the second quarter. We expect another sequential increase in line rates and output in the fourth quarter. We also completed the consolidation of the door frame production in Sylmar, California at the end of the quarter.
Segment margin was 18%. Margins in heat exchanges were robust as volumes outrun the significant investments in capacity build. With direct labor, less than 10% of its cost base, this business converts incremental volume exceptionally well. Those gains in heat exchangers were offset by cost of ramping production simultaneously across CO2 systems, specialty cases and refrigerator door cases ahead of higher demand and shipment rates in 2027, which is reflected in our backlog. Heat exchangers should continue to benefit from [ via ] leverage in 2027, with a good portion of Q1 revenue already in backlog.
In food retail, we have absorbed roughly $40 million of costs year-to-date from investments and extra labor costs associated with the production ramp along with duplicate fixed costs of running 2 facilities for the throughput of 1. As line rates continue to ramp and as the roll-off of fixed cost accelerates through the balance of the year, margins in Climate & Sustainability Technologies are poised to improve meaningfully in 2027.
I'll pass it over to Chris.
Christopher Woenker
Thanks, Rich, and good morning, everyone. Let's go to our cash flow statement on Slide 8. Year-to-date, free cash flow was $703 million or 11% of revenue, up $72 million over the prior year, driven primarily by increased operating cash conversion which more than offset working capital investments to support accelerating top line growth. Third quarter free cash flow was $383 million or 17% of revenue. We've taken up our full year CapEx guide for the year to reflect the organic investments we're making behind demand strength. Free cash flow accelerated in the third quarter, consistent with historical trends, and we expect a further increase in the fourth quarter, which is historically our highest cash-generating quarter. Our full year free cash flow guidance remains on track at 14% to 16% of revenue.
With that, let me turn it back to Rich.
Richard Tobin
Okay. I'm on Slide 9. Organic investment remains our highest return use of capital. On the left are our most meaningful projects. In support of our organic revenue trajectory, we have greenfield expansions underway in below ground retail fueling, cryogenic components, flow meters in the U.S. and single-use biopharma components in Asia, along with capacity investments in radio frequency equipment for space, printer and ink production and specialty cases in CO2 systems and large heat exchanges. Many of these projects will be online by the end of the first quarter of 2027.
On the productivity side, we are optimizing our vehicle services footprint, extracting synergies from our polymer processing acquisition and have now completed the footprint consolidation in food retail. These actions generate substantial carryover restructuring benefits which we will quantify when we provide full year guidance in January.
On the right side of the slide are the bolt-on acquisitions we announced in the quarter. Cloeren, which we closed in August, adds extrusion dies and feedblocks to our mag polymer processing platform, along with more than 300,000 square feet of U.S. manufacturing capacity close to the U.S. petrochemical and space launch infrastructure.
Leistung, which we signed and expect to close in the fourth quarter, gives our Clean Energy segment a low-cost state-of-the-art cryogenics components manufacturing presence in India. Both businesses carry excess capacity that other Dover operating companies will leverage its manufacturing hubs in highly strategic locations.
Moving to Slide 10. Our balance sheet remains a competitive advantage and our capital allocation priorities are unchanged. Organic investment generates our highest returns, and we are guiding full year CapEx of $200 million to $220 million, with the capacity and productivity projects I just covered delivering attractive returns into next year. We have committed approximately $80 million to our 2 announced acquisitions. And our pipeline remains active for bolt-on opportunities in high priority markets. We have also repurchased approximately $400 million of shares year-to-date, including $330 million in the third quarter, with over $3 billion of dry powder at quarter end. We have the ample flexibility to play offensive capital allocation and a near-term bias towards returning capital to shareholders.
Let's finish with Slide 11. We are moving our full year guidance towards the upper end of the range. Our focus is on finishing the year strong, and our order book gives us confidence in the forecast with momentum carrying into 2027. Alongside a constructive demand backdrop and a strong order book, we will benefit from carryover restructuring savings contributions from completed acquisitions, a lower share count and a roll-off of transition costs in food retail. We look forward to closing out the year strong and are confident as we enter 2027 from a position of strength.
Over to you, Jack.
Jack Dickens
Leslie, we can go right to the Q&A.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Steve Tusa with Wells Fargo.
分析师问答
Charles Stephen Tusa
Just on the backlog, I think it's like a little bit above $3 billion now, I kind of like go back, do the math. And I think you said 50% of that is like shippable for next year. Is there anything in kind of the non-backlog business that you look out to next year that you would be like worried about being unsustainable or dropping off at all?
Richard Tobin
I'd characterize it this way. I guess, where we have been capacity constrained is what's driving the backlog into 2027. So the duration of the demand is a good indicator because customers are basically getting in line to reserve that capacity.
It is not overly influenced from some of our more traditional long-cycle businesses. Maag's pretty much as a bottom, same with Belvac. So it's not -- those numbers aren't influenced by those 2 businesses. So that's actually upside the backlog build as we go into 2027. And then our traditional short-cycle businesses, we don't have a lot of visibility going into next year, and we'll just book and ship as we normally do between now and the end of the year.
Charles Stephen Tusa
Right. And is there any reason for the growth to like slow materially in 4Q? I know you kind of like guided that number. The midpoint is a bit of a slowing. Like anything stand out? I mean the orders have been pretty good, book-to-bill above 1 seasonally.
Richard Tobin
Yes, not really, other than the fact that Q4 is not always in our control, right? We've got the orders, we can make the orders, then it becomes a question at the end of the year whether those orders get called off by our customers or does everybody play a kind of managing the working capital gain at the end of the year. So we're always a little bit cautious because December could go almost either way in any given year. But there's nothing based on the trajectory that we see that's any slowing. It's pure calendarization.
Charles Stephen Tusa
Okay. One more. Just on the buyback you've done, $300 million or something like that. Are you done with that? Or is there still some of that -- you have a ton of cash, ton of capacity is -- can you [ queue ] through some of that?
Richard Tobin
Yes. I think in corporate speak, what we said is that our bias was still on capital return. So take that for what it is.
Charles Stephen Tusa
Great. I don't understand all corporate speak, but that's pretty clear. So I appreciate that.
Operator
Our next question comes from Nigel Coe, Wolfe Research.
Nigel Coe
Maybe, Rich, could you just kind of give us a little kind of sense on the dual cost you called out, I think, $40 million of investment and deal cost that's now behind us. Maybe give us a sense on how you see CST margins in the fourth quarter, but more importantly, going into 2027. And you've said 20% margin target in the past for that segment. Are we on track for that in 2028?
Richard Tobin
Yes. Just for clarity's sake, it's the year-to-date headwind costs of the plant closure and the redundant labor that we've had to run as a result of that. And that's year-to-date, okay? So that number will actually probably go up between now and the end of the year because as line rates come up, we'll absorb that extra labor and then we'll begin to flip it over into productivity. So that's the $40 million.
Yes. I mean I think that we're well on track of meeting the targets that we put on that sector because of 2 things. Number one, that the carryover of not having those costs of consolidation between the 2 years is an add back. The volume across the segment goes up, and so the incremental margin of the fixed cost goes up along with it. So I think that's why I said that we can expect a material change in 2027 in the margin of that particular segment.
Nigel Coe
But no numbers?
Richard Tobin
Come on, Nigel. We're going to give you guidance when we get to the end of the year, but it's material.
Nigel Coe
Okay. You've said 20% of the past. I'm just trying to get a sense on that. But maybe -- can we just talk about the PPS orders -- sorry, not PPS, CST orders? Been strong for a long time now, no sign of slowdown. I'm just wondering maybe if you can just like try and give us another sort of second level detail on SWEP versus CO2 versus core refrigeration.
And I do want to get a sense on one number, Rich, 3% growth in data center this year is impressive. But I would think it'd be even more impressive just given the growth in the market. And I'm wondering if there's any capacity constraints within SWEP that maybe gets released in 2027?
Richard Tobin
Well, yes. I mean I think that if you go on the slide of our capital investments and if you go back and read the transcript of what I said, yes, we've been capacity constrained all year. It doesn't seem to be preventing the actual build-outs, but everybody is trying to get in front of securing the supply. So there's a lot of signaling effect in there. But we are basically ramping to double capacity into the main product line that's been growing. This is SWEP now, that's been sent into data centers. That will change over time because there'll be a shift between the central cooling system demand, which we see it now, into more CDU mix into the future, and we're taking that into consideration.
In terms of the backlog, I don't want to say 50-50, but it's dominated by CO2 systems demand and SWEP.
Operator
Our next question comes from Mike Halloran with Baird.
Michael Halloran
So back to the backlog question on some level, what's the normal conversion ratio at this point? You have your backlog shippable next year. What does that normally look like? And maybe any thoughts on the lead times you're seeing in the industry and if those are starting to extend?
Richard Tobin
It is higher than average that we would see at this time. I said if we go back and read the transcripts, we would expect in a kind of, let's call it, a normal year, for book-to-bill to come down in Q3 just because of the order of magnitude of shipments. But because of the secular growth nature of some of these businesses that we're in, that customers in certain segments are securing supply, so trying to secure capacity, and so that they're ordering well in advance of what we would normally expect. And that's why we gave you the backlog figures, and that's why we tried to monetize how much of that is 2027 because that, in general terms, would not look like that except for the pace of the growth rate in some of those segments.
Michael Halloran
That makes sense. And on the buyback side, M&A side, obviously, it certainly makes sense that you're pushing more on the capital return time short term. But maybe what's just happening on the M&A side of things? Are you getting priced out of deals at this point? Has the activity slowed? Maybe just some thoughts there.
Richard Tobin
Yes. I mean the activity naturally slows in Q4. Very little comes to the market at the end of the year. So whatever has come to market is -- has come to market not to get into certain deals. Look, we've got return criteria that we stick to. So there are some things that we didn't get that we would have liked to get, but the purchase price that those assets sold forward above that criteria at the end of the day.
We'll see in 2027, but we've got a ton on our plate of organic investment, which is probably going to drive as much revenue growth as kind of bolt-on acquisitions would do. So we retain a posture of optionality, meaning that we'll participate in M&A. We've got some interesting stuff in the pipeline. But with all the cash that we're producing that we carried into this year and all the cash that we're going to produce this year, that clearly -- that our stance is now on capital return.
Operator
Our next question is from Joe O'Dea from Vertical Research.
Joseph O'Dea
Could you talk a little bit about pricing and what might be in the pipeline just with respect to the inflationary backdrop? It looked like the price this quarter was pretty similar to the second quarter, maybe a little bit tougher comp. But are you out there in the market and you need to do anything more on the pricing side -- to carryover into next year?
Richard Tobin
Yes, it depends, Joe. I mean we are actually have moved up pricing decisions this year and have been introducing pricing, which in a kind of a stable year of a low inflation environment, we'd kind of wait till the beginning of the year. We've actually accelerated that in certain instances depending on exposure to a variety of different things, whether it's commodity group metals or other things. So I think we're on the front foot of getting ahead of what anybody's view about price cost is going into '27. I think we're actually probably a full quarter in front of getting in front of that.
Joseph O'Dea
And then just another one on the food retail and the production ramp costs. As you think about full year being somewhere above 40, how much of that we can think about as being nonrepeat? Is there a carryover associated with it? Or do you think that those are all kind of contained costs that you'll be able to leverage...
Richard Tobin
It will -- so the speed is coming down as the volumes go up, right, you get the fixed cost absorption benefit. The balance of it is productivity. So it's just winding out kind of extra labor costs as you stabilize the line rates. So we would expect that to progressively get better over the balance of the year and then probably finish up by the end of Q1. But I don't expect the 40 or whatever it ends up being at the end of this year flows through in total going into next year unless volume drops. And based on our backlog right now, we've seen no indication of volume dropping in 2027.
Operator
Our next question comes from Scott Davis with Melius Research.
Steven Winoker
What -- Rich, what happens in retail fueling when prices -- when fuel prices are up this much? Does that create a little bit more cash flow for these guys to invest in their businesses? Seems like that -- it's been a while since we've had a big jump like this. But what does $6 diesel and $4 dollar gas do for these folks?
Richard Tobin
Yes. Not to talk about our customers' profitability, which -- many of which are publicly traded. At the end of the day, earnings spread on fueling products have been up substantially over the past 18 to 24 months, and I don't expect that to narrow. The better news -- so that's great. We like healthy customers that are making a lot of money, number one. And number two, the good part of what we've seen about the CapEx is there is supply constraints in that particular market, and that is just lengthening the duration of what we believe the demand cycle is. So we knew we were coming into a CapEx cycle for a variety of different reasons. We now believe that, that is going to extend. I think we called it out 1.5 years ago, it was a 3-year cycle. It's probably going to -- we could probably argue it's going to be at least 4.
Scott Davis
And is that an area where you're able to get price because of that supply chain dislocation?
Richard Tobin
It's -- in terms of the amount of market participants, it is a market that we like.
Operator
Our next question comes from Andy Kaplowitz, Citigroup.
Andrew Kaplowitz
Rich, so DII margin, I think, was the best margin that segment is recorded. I know you mentioned mix productivity effects, but I think you've been working on structural cost actions in that segment. So when you think about DII's margins even more sustainable, closer to Q3 rates, or maybe was that more of a one-time bump?
Richard Tobin
Look, I look at year-to-date at the end of the day because it's our most global business, there's a lot running through that, that some of our other businesses don't have to deal with specialty FX and then mix because of the disproportionate difference in margin between the consumables and the equipment. So it will move around for that.
Having said that, if you go back and take a look over a 3- to 5-year period, we've steadily marched up the margin in that business through a variety of different measures. We're making some pretty significant investments. We built a brand-new plant in Poland this past year, and we're going to finish up on basically rebuilding our ink production in 2027, so we expect some productivity to come out of that. So yes, I mean, I wouldn't get all excited about the quarters -- this quarter's margin. But if you look at it on a year-to-date basis, that's entirely sustainable.
Andrew Kaplowitz
That's great. And maybe a similar question on Clean Energy & Fueling. If I look at Q3 year-over-year margin, it's a little bit more difficult than the first half. I know you talked about cryo space production ramp impacting margin. But maybe update us some of the platform you created in that business, that journey, I think you talked about the 25% margin. Where is that?
Richard Tobin
Look, we're tracking there, but we've been -- the opportunities that we found on the cryo side over the past 18 months, which is driving the top line, is requiring a lot of investment on our part. So that has got a little bit of a dilutive effect, but we'll take that trade-off any day, right? Because it's driving the top line and they are -- these are businesses with secular growth that once we go through the build phase, we can expect what we saw in SWEP over the last couple of years where we had margins that were down because investment was running forward than the revenue.
Now we've got the revenue in SWEP and so the incremental margin is robust. We'd expect that same kind of trajectory. And that's the reason that we put that slide in about all the organic investments that we're making is, it's not only to kind of explain what we think about the durability of the revenue increase, but it's to give you a signal of we're going to invest here, there's some cost of making those investments. But we believe, over time, the return on invested capital there will be excellent.
Operator
Our next question comes from Brett Linzey, Mizuho.
We will move to our next question. Our next question comes from Amit Mehrotra with UBS.
Amit Mehrotra
Just maybe one quick one. SWEP lead times. Last time I checked in, they were like 25 weeks. Is that still the case? And I think that's where most of your copper exposure is, obviously, copper has come off a little bit, but sort of hit all-time highs in September. I think you have material pass-through on that. So no issue on price cost. Maybe you can enlighten me on that. But maybe there's a margin issue as copper rises in that business? Maybe you can talk about those 2 things?
Richard Tobin
Yes. Let's deal with copper first. I think that it is -- and we do have copper exposure there, but it's built into the pricing mechanism with our supplier contracts in SWEP. I don't know what lead times are off the top of my head. I mean, we're bringing on additional capacity sequentially through the year, but with a pretty big jump this quarter going into Q1, then it becomes a big debate of well, but the lead times keep going out because the orders keep coming in, in advance of that capacity build. Does that wind down in '27? Hard to say. Right now, we don't see it, but we are bringing on more capacity because the fact that we believe in the durability of the demand.
Amit Mehrotra
But it's not measured in years, it's measured in quarters, right?
Richard Tobin
Yes, yes. No, no, we're not -- it's not in years.
Amit Mehrotra
So I guess just my follow-up question, my clarifying question then. If I think about quarterly order in dollar terms over the last 3 quarters. So this year, sort of averaged $2.3 billion to $2.4 billion depending on the quarter. That's about 9%, 10% higher than the average quarterly revenue of this year. I'm sure you're going to tell me to curb my enthusiasm, but is that the wrong way to think about maybe the organic growth opportunity next year?
Richard Tobin
Let me answer it this way. We've given your book-to-bill. Against my own advice, we gave you the number of the backlog increase to get into the high-level math when you don't know what the duration is of the timing of those orders is a fool's game. I'm sure Jack can give you all kinds of clarifying questions, but I can't go there right now.
Amit Mehrotra
I guess that was my question about lead times, right?
Richard Tobin
Yes, yes. Look, I mean we're not losing share because of lead times, right? Because generally speaking, we're in very concentrated markets from a supply base. So those who bring on the capacity proactively tend to win, and that's why we've been investing in advance of some of this demand to the detriment of margins, by the way. But it's -- but they end up being good investments once they roll over and absorb the fixed cost. So we can see that in SWEP right now.
Operator
Our next question is from Andrew Obin, Bank of America.
David Ridley-Lane
This is David Ridley-Lane on for Andrew. Clean Energy & Fueling, there's a comment that you're planning a greenfield expansion and below-ground retail fueling. I know that there is a regulatory or replacement cycle there for underground tanks, but adding capacity expansion suggests that you think this is kind of a multiyear durable cycle. Is that the right interpretation?
Richard Tobin
Yes. I think I answered it a minute ago to Scott. The -- there is capacity constraints and underground equipment to become into compliance on tanks. And that -- and because there's capacity -- by the way, we don't supply. But what that is doing is lengthening the duration of the demand because you can't get the tanks to do the work, right? What we're expanding in is all of the products that are around that where we see robust demand and our margins are quite good. So that's the way I would answer it.
David Ridley-Lane
And just a quick follow-up. Have you been hearing any impact from higher interest rates from any of your more capital planning type businesses? Is that something that's pulled up to your level?
Richard Tobin
None.
David Ridley-Lane
That's very clear.
Operator
Our next question is from Joe Ritchie with Goldman Sachs.
Joseph Ritchie
So Rich, look, the Slide 9 is great, right, gives you a lot of detail on your capacity expansions, organic investments, et cetera. I guess the question I have is as you -- as we're getting closer and closer to 2027, like how much does this set you up for growth beyond '27 based on what you know today? Or do you think there's going to possibly be additional capacity expansion beyond what you've already announced?
Richard Tobin
Well, I hope we have additional capacity expansion, but the capacities that we are laying in are for multiyear, especially the greenfields, right? I mean we're building -- greenfield is like building a new site, and we would never capacitize a new site for the next 12 months unless -- because you never get the return on capital there. So they're all -- have been sized on the initial investment for a multiyear duration. So in a way, if we have the same slide again next year and there are additional capacity on top of it, it's a great sign because it's just more demand than we've sized the initial investment. So right now, these investments we believe that we can capture our share of the market of the growth rates that I think that we showed you on Slide 5.
Joseph Ritchie
Got it. Okay. That's super helpful. And then going back to the question earlier about the $40 million and the $40 million potentially going higher as the year progresses. I guess, quick math, right, taking a look at your revenue year-to-date in CST, it's like -- that equates like roughly 300 basis points, if I'm doing the math right. So I guess the question I have is you get into 2027, like when would you expect to see a turn in CST margins and starting to -- obviously, you've been taking on these extra costs throughout the year and will continue. But I'm just curious when you would expect to be a turn based on what you know today?
Richard Tobin
I think that we will beat our comp in Q1.
Operator
Our next question is from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas.
Andrew Buscaglia
If you could -- just kind of tying this all together, I get -- sort of get the sense -- your outlook for '27 or your confidence in '27 has improved in the last few months. I mean just based on some of these higher-growth markets and like the visibility you have. Am I right in that, that's the core reason you're kind of sounding better on '27 or sounding positive on '27 or -- or Slide 6 sort of suggests like your underlying just kind of core markets are seeing some improvements cyclically. So I guess where is more of the confidence coming from? Is that high-growth stuff or like that core business?
Richard Tobin
Yes. Well, I mean, the slides are put in there for a reason, and it's the trajectory growth rates on where we've been investing, have -- I mean, we're looking at, I don't know, what did we say, 500 basis points of improvement over the past 24 or not even 24 months, 20 months. So that we're good there. And we have a data point in terms of orders and backlog earlier this year than we would have in a normal year. So growth -- where we've chosen to participate, those markets are performing well. And the customers that we have across the broader portfolio are beginning to order into 2027 for a variety of reasons that we usually are kind of cautious until we get into giving full year guidance because usually, we don't have that kind of visibility.
Andrew Buscaglia
Yes. That's the sense I get. Okay. And then just on the heat exchanger side, you talked about -- you sort of said you hope you have more capacity investments because I mean things are probably going well. What are capacity requirements like heat exchangers, in your opinion? And then just given the really strong growth we're seeing in that data center cooling side, what's the competitive dynamics there? That's always been sort of a risk that you're not alone in identifying this growth in -- yes, if you could kind of comment on that too, please?
Richard Tobin
Yes. Everybody wants to be in data centers. I see the M&A presentations all the time. Look, this is -- that's a highly automated process. You need to make capacity decisions 18 months in advance before them coming online. So this is not kind of hire a bunch of people and get bigger throughput. It's actually very little people in the process. And so it's a very highly engineered -- probably one of the most highly engineered products that we have in the entire portfolio.
It's a very concentrated market, but those competitors that we have, if you went and looked, are also announcing capacity expansion. So I don't -- I think that we've done a very good job of proactively investing in capacity in advance of the market to the detriment of margins in the past. So we'll get our fair share here.
But I can't disagree with you. I mean everybody wants to be in data center. So you've got to be -- we're going to find out altogether about the duration of the demand. Right now, I don't think we're getting over our skis just because our backlog says what it is, and we believe there is going to be a conversion into more CDU mix than we see now. But I think that we're positioned competitively and from a capacity point of view, appropriately.
Operator
Our final question comes from Brandon Knutson, Morgan Stanley.
Brandon Knutson
Just a quick follow-up on CST mark. So you said it's going to be stronger -- growth from -- flat. A lot of that...
Jack Dickens
Brandon, we're having a hard time hearing you. Are you far away from the microphone?
Brandon Knutson
Hello?
Jack Dickens
Hey, can you hear us, Brandon?
Brandon Knutson
Yes. Can you hear me?
Jack Dickens
Yes, we can hear you now. Go ahead.
Brandon Knutson
CST, you saw strong growth accelerate the margins...
Richard Tobin
Brandon, you're cutting out. You know what, give Jack a call, he'll get to you. But -- you're cutting in and out.
Jack Dickens
Okay. I think we can wrap up the call, Leslie.
Operator
That concludes our question-and-answer period and Dover's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. You may now disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day.
本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。











