tradingkey.logo
搜索

Aethlon Medical (AEMD) 2027财年第一季度业绩电话会议:肿瘤试验进入最后一个队列

TradingKey2026年8月14日 08:02
facebooktwitterlinkedin

Aethlon Medical公布2027财年第一季度运营费用为160万美元,较上年同期下降11.9%。截至2026年6月30日,现金及现金等价物约490万美元,季后公开发售筹集约400万美元,现有资金可支持未来至少12个月运营。澳大利亚肿瘤学研究已进入第三个也是最后一个队列,首位受试者完成治疗与八周随访,未出现设备相关严重不良事件。管理层目标在2026日历年末或2027年初完成治疗和随访。队列2初步观察显示总细胞外囊泡及癌症进展相关微RNA有所减少。此外,该公司正评估Hemopurifier在新冠后遗症等其他领域的应用。

该摘要由AI生成

核心要点

  • Aethlon Medical(NASDAQ:AEMD)公布2027财年第一季度运营费用约为160万美元,较上年同期的180万美元下降11.9%。
  • 截至2026年6月30日,现金及现金等价物总额约为490万美元。季度结束后,该公司通过公开股票发售筹集了约400万美元的募集资金总额。
  • 管理层认为,根据现有计划,当前的现金资源足以支持未来至少12个月的运营。
  • 澳大利亚肿瘤学研究已进入第三个也是最后一个队列。首位受试者完成了三次4小时的Hemopurifier治疗及为期八周的随访,未出现与设备相关的严重不良事件或剂量限制性毒性。
  • 假设未发生符合条件的安全性事件,仍需对另外两名受试者进行治疗以完成研究。管理层的目标是在2026日历年末或2027年初之前完成治疗和随访。
  • 队列2的初步观察结果显示,总细胞外囊泡(包括肿瘤来源的细胞外囊泡)以及与癌症进展相关的微RNA有所减少。该公司强调,这些发现是基于有限的原始数据,尚未经过正式的统计分析。

关键财务数据

指标2027财年第一季度 / 2026年6月30日对比或背景
运营费用约160万美元较上年同期的180万美元下降11.9%
现金及现金等价物约490万美元截至2026年6月30日的余额
季后公开发售约400万美元普通股发行的募集资金总额
现金支撑期至少12个月管理层根据现有计划做出的估计

运营费用的下降反映了专业服务费、一般及行政费用以及临床前研究成本的减少。管理层还表示,运营亏损也相应减少。

业务与运营表现

Hemopurifier目前仍属于试验性医疗器械。Aethlon Medical在澳大利亚进行的肿瘤学试验正在三个队列中评估强度逐步递增的治疗方案。

队列1的受试者接受了一次4小时的治疗,而队列2的受试者在一周内接受了两次4小时的治疗。管理层表示,对队列2原始数据的审查表明,与队列1相比,受试者之间的生物标志物变化更加一致,积极的方向性变化持续时间更长,在某些情况下可延伸至八周的测量节点。

第三个队列在一周内接受三次4小时的治疗。在电话会议召开时,首位受试者的实验室结果尚未出来。正式的统计分析和剂量效应分析将在试验完成后进行。

Aethlon Medical还在评估Hemopurifier在肿瘤学之外领域的应用。2026年6月25日发表的研究报告称,新冠后遗症(Long COVID)患者血浆样本中的大小细胞外囊泡能够结合到Hemopurifier的专有亲和树脂上。暴露于该树脂还与免疫功能失调和炎症相关的微RNA水平降低有关。

该公司计划与学术机构及监管机构探讨新冠后遗症可能的临床开发路径。其实验室还在单独研究慢性肾脏病患者中与狼疮和心脏病相关的细胞外囊泡。

管理层指引

管理层的目标是在2026日历年末或2027年初之前完成澳大利亚肿瘤学试验剩余的Hemopurifier治疗和八周随访。随后的步骤将包括数据分析、完成临床研究报告以及与监管机构就注册前试验进行讨论。

管理层表示,如果队列3证实了队列2中所观察到的生物标志物模式,则每周三次治疗的方案可能会被推行至未来的疗效研究中。该决定仍取决于完整的数据集。

风险与关注事项

  • 生物标志物研究结果是初步的,涉及的受试者人数有限,不应被解释为安全性、有效性或临床获益的证据。
  • 队列之间的比较目前是基于原始观察结果,而非相对于基线的百分比变化或正式的统计检验。
  • 在不出现与设备相关的严重不良事件或剂量限制性毒性的前提下,试验仍需要增加两名受试者。
  • 管理层认为每周超过三次、每次4小时的治疗方案是不切实际的,因为每次治疗都需要准备和拆卸时间,这几乎需要患者投入整整一天的时间。
  • 将更多疾病适应症推进至临床试验阶段,可能需要新的资金、合作伙伴、政府补贴或其他资金来源。
  • 新冠后遗症的监管路径仍不确定。该公司现有的突破性医疗器械认定涵盖危及生命的病毒,而管理层表示新冠后遗症目前尚未纳入其中。

分析师问答环节亮点

管理层澄清称,队列1中大约三分之二的受试者表现出生物标志物变化,通常持续两到三周。在队列2中,受试者之间的原始信号显得更加一致,某些方向性变化持续到了八周。队列3对于确定治疗频率是否与生物标志物变化的幅度更大或持续时间更长相关至关重要。

该公司目前没有计划测试每周四次治疗。管理层认为,采取周一/周三/周五模式的每周三次、每次4小时方案,是患者耐受性和物流安排方面的实际上限。

关于Hemopurifier更广泛的应用,Aethlon Medical预计将利用其科学家、设备、试剂和外部获取的样本,继续开展低成本的内部研究。管理层表示,由此产生的数据和学术论文可能会带来合作选择,但未承诺任何交易或监管范围拓展。

业绩电话会议完整文字记录


完整财报电话会议逐字稿

管理层陈述

Operator

Good day, and welcome to the Aethlon Medical First Quarter Fiscal 2027 Earnings and Corporate Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Frakes, CEO and CFO of Aethlon Medical. Please go ahead.

James Frakes

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Aethlon Medical's First Fiscal Quarter ended June 30, 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Jim Frakes, and I'm the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Athlon Medical. At 4:15 p.m. Eastern Time today, Athlon Medical released financial results for its first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026.

If you have not seen or received Aethlon Medical's earnings release, please visit the Investors page at athlonmedical.com to view it. Following this introduction and the reading of the company's forward-looking statement disclaimer, Dr. Stephen LaRosa, our Chief Medical Officer; and I will provide an overview of Aethlon's strategy and recent developments. I will then make some brief remarks on Aethlon's financials. We will then open up the call for the Q&A session.

Before we start the business portion of the call, please note that the news release today and this call contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. The company cautions you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement. These statements are based on expectations and assumptions as of the date of this conference call.

Such forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and and actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements can be found under the caption Risk Factors in the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. The company's most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in the company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Except as may be required by law, the company does not intend nor does it undertake any duty to update this information to reflect future events or circumstances. I'd like to begin by highlighting progress during the first fiscal quarter ended June 30, as we continue to execute against our strategy of advancing the Hemopurifier platform while maintaining disciplined cost control.

During the period, we achieved important clinical research and intellectual property milestones. We continue to advance our oncology program while also expanding our evaluation of chemo purifier applications into additional disease areas through preclinical research.

As Steve will discuss, we are now in the final cohort of our oncology trial. We continue to generate encouraging preliminary biomarker observations, and we are expanding our research into potential applications beyond oncology. Taken together, we believe these achievements demonstrate continued execution against our key priorities of clinical development, platform expansion, intellectual property growth and disciplined resource management.

And now I will turn the call over to Dr. LaRossa, who will cover updates on the Australian oncology trial and then on our R&D efforts. Steve?

Steven Larosa

Thank you, Jim. Before discussing our clinical observation, I want to emphasize that the Hemopurifier remains an investigational device. Any biomarker observations discussed today are preliminary and are based on the limited number of participants and should not be interpreted as evidence of safety or effectiveness or clinical benefit. The first participated in our third and final cohort of our Australian oncology trial has been enrolled and treated. .

This participant received 3 4-hour HemoCue treatments over the course of a 1-week period. The participant is now 2 months into the follow-up period and has not experienced any device-related serious adverse events or dose-limiting consistency. We need to only treat 2 additional participants to complete the trial, provided that none of the future participants develop any of these safety events. The 3 investigative sites remain engaged and are actively prescreening potential participants. Our goal remains to complete all HP treatments and the 8-week follow-up central lab measurement period by the end of this year 2020. The next steps would the analysis of the data.

Clinical study report completion and preregistration clinical trial discussion with regulatory parties Central lab measurements of extracellular vesicles microRNAs and lymphocyte subsets have been completed by the University of Sydney on the samples from cohort 2 of the clinical trial, where participants received 2 4-hour chemopurified treatments over the course of 1 week. A review of the raw data has taken place. As stated in the press release on July 13, 2026. We continue to see decreases in total extracellular vesicle comps including tumor-derived to cellular vesicles, and microRNA linked to cancer progression following the HB treatment.

Additionally, we observed increases in lipid success as well as positive directional changes and laboratory permit ratios that have been associated with responses to immunotherapy. The changes appear to be more consistent across participants and persisted for longer in cohort 2 compared with cohort 1, where participants received a single hemophurifiine treatment, independent formal statistical analysis, including a dose response analysis will be performed upon completion of the trial. Segue now to preclinical R&D activities. Our prior work in Long cove was published in the Preview Journal International Journal of Molecular Sciences on the 25 June 2026.

In this publication, we present data demonstrating that both small and large EV extractor vesicles in noncoded patient plasma samples bind to the proprietary G&A affinity resin within our Athlon Hemopurifier. Furthermore, following exposure of the patient plasma to the resin, a decrease in microRNAs associated with immune disregulation and inflammation was observed.

This data, coupled with the data from an outside group demonstrating the presence of the COVID spike protein and protein associated with inflammation and amoral clotting within the EVs of long cover patients, raises the possibility of EV removal as a potential parametal therapeutic strategy and Ronco. We plan discussions with academic institutions as well as regulatory agencies to see if there's a clinical development path forward or if additional preclinical work will be necessary. Finally, our lab continues to perform experiments exploring the ability of the Hemopurifier technology to bind to remove EVs implicated in other diseases, such as lupus and heart disease in those with chronic kidney disease.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Jim for the financial discussion and the questions.

James Frakes

Thanks, Steve, and good afternoon, again, everyone. Let me turn briefly to our financial position and our focus on disciplined spending. At June 30, 2026, a we have approximately $4.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, providing resources to support ongoing clinical and research activities. Subsequent to quarter end, we further strengthened our balance sheet by raising approximately $4 million in gross proceeds through a public offering of common stock. Based on current plans, we believe our cash resources are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next 12 months.

Our consolidated operating expenses for the quarter decreased 11.9% and to approximately $1.6 million compared with $1.8 million in the prior year quarter. That decrease was driven by lower professional fees and reduced general and administrative and preclinical research costs and our operating loss declined accordingly. You will find additional detail on these expense changes in our 10-Q, which breaks down specific drivers by category. We included these earnings results and related commentary in our press release issued this afternoon. The release also included the balance sheet for June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026.

The and the consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. We will file our quarterly report on Form 10-Q following this call. Our next earnings call for the fiscal second quarter ending September 30, 2026, will coincide with the filing of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q in November 2026, and now we would be happy to answer any questions that you may have. Operator, please open the call for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions]

The first question today comes from Marla Marin with Zacks.

分析师问答

Marla Marin

So I want to go back to something, Steve, that you said in your prepared remarks. I want to make sure that I understood. So the 3 different cohorts of the Australia study, increase dosage, increase treatment with the hemopuriapier. And I think what you said was currently, even though it's early in terms of a full data set, you're thinking that Phase II participants exhibit a longer benefit than those who participated in Phase 1. Is that the right way to think about what your comments were .

Steven Larosa

Right. So in cohort 1, the participants received only a single 4-hour HP treatment in Cohort 2, they received to 4-hour treatment. So cohort 1 would be like on Friday 4 hours, whereas Cohort 2 would be Monday and Friday for 4 hours. All cohorts within had samples done before and after the Hemopurifier treatments and then weekly in the follow-up period for 4 weeks, so week 1, 2, 3, and 4 and 8. And we looked at EVs, T cells as well as microRNAs over the course of all those time points. When you look at the raw data, and again, this is based purely on observations of the raw data, this is now looking at change from baseline, percent change from baseline or formal statistical out.

If you look purely at the raw data, typically in Cohort 1, we were seeing changes in 2 out of 3 participants where in Cohort 2, we tended to see it more consistent across participants. And then if you look at the positive directional change in those parameters, where in Cohort 1, you see those changes go out, say, 2, 3 weeks. We're seeing more times in Cohort 2 where we're seeing the positive directional change go out as far as the 8-week time period. So at least what I can say is it looks like the biologic signal is more consistent across 3 participants in Cohort 2.

And then it seems the positive directional change seems to last long. So it really cohort 3 will follow the tail if we continue to see that kind of increased magnitude and change as well as duration of change that will tell us that what we've seen to date is real, but encourage nonetheless, by at least the signal and the raw data that we're seeing.

Marla Marin

Got it. Got it. And you can't really comment yet on Cohort 3 because it's so early, correct?

Steven Larosa

Yes. We don't have any result. The first patient is like I said, just finish their 2-month or their 8-week follow-up period. So we don't have any data back yet on that patient in terms of the oral .

Marla Marin

But let's say that the trajectory continues along the same lines, as you just described in Cohort 3 participants show an even longer duration of improvement and more consistent across the participants. -- would there be a reason to think that you should -- when you -- if and when you go forward and design the next set of research parameters, would there make any sense to design a cohort that gets 4 treatments weekly? Or you think that the retreatment .

Steven Larosa

I think it's an excellent question. The thing you start running up against this tolerability and feasibility. So what we thought based on clinical medicine. And then we're drawing on the experience in hemodialysis mostly that anything more than 4 hours of treatment 3 times a week, say, a Monday, Wednesday, Friday, schedule this will not be tolerable to patients. That's about as much as the old tolerate. And so no, we're not considering going to 4 treatments that on .

Marla Marin

Okay. And that is not a function of the white Hemopurifier treatment is currently administered that could possibly change if you do move to a simplified treatment -- streamline treatment system. Is that correct? It's not -- it has nothing to do with the way you're treating people. It really is just having that treatment in and of itself probably cannot be tolerated more than 3 times a week. .

Steven Larosa

Yes, well tolerated both in terms of logistics and what patients themselves. I mean you talk about 4 hours, but there's also time in terms of hooking the patient up, timing the system taking them off. So it ends up being a complete day, it's not just 4 hours. So yes, anything more than 3 days. .

Again, and if we see in cohort 3, what we're seeing in Cohort 2 where we're seeing the directional changes we want, hopefully even greater magnitude with 3 treatments then we would take that 3 treatment in a week strategy forward for an efficacy trial. But they're kind of getting a little bit of ahead of ourselves, we have to see the data first. .

Marla Marin

Okay. One last question. So you mentioned also that there are many other conditions and diseases where EVs are indicated -- so you've been really good in the past. And Jim, I think that this is more of a question for you probably. You've been very good in the past at maintaining certain maintaining research on the Hemopurifier without incurring significant costs, not actual critical testing, but publishing papers speaking at medical conventions and other ways of trying to test the hypothesis that the Hemopurifier can be beneficial across the spectrum, of different indications.

Are there other opportunities do you think for doing more and broader work about the Hemopurifier in an extremely cost-effective way. .

James Frakes

Well, we can continue to do what we're doing, which is exactly as you described, Marla, using our in-house scientists, our in-house equipment, buying reagents and things, but that's not expensive. And trying to get samples either given to us or an extensively purchased. And we can continue to do that, continue to write articles -- but to really move forward, eventually, we would need to either bring in more capital to finance a clinical trial in 1 of these -- 1 or more of these diseases, to partner up with somebody, other government grants or 2 there are options out there and -- but I think we would need to support 1 of those ways to actually conduct a clinical trial in 1 of these things. So we will continue to do what we're doing. And try to find the right opportunities to move forward. .

Marla Marin

Okay. That's makes sense. But is it also fair to say that what you're doing, even though it's clear that you need to proceed to more structured clinical research -- is it fair to think that what you are doing gives you much more optionality in terms of finding a potential partner for certain or a variety of indications.

James Frakes

It's possible. We are talking to people. If another option is in future discussions with the FDA, if they chose to broaden or add to our breakthrough device designation in viruses.

Right now, it's just for life-threatening viruses, which long coba is not considered a life-threatening virus. But if they were to expand it to include that, then we could do potential emergency use the one-off treatments actually get some human data. But again, that's just a possibility. I'm not promising anything, but those options could happen.

Operator

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jim Frakes for any closing remarks.

James Frakes

Thank you. In closing, I'd like to recap some items to keep on your radar screens. First, we are now in the final cohort of our Australian oncology trial, with the goal of completing treatment and related follow-up by the end of calendar 2026 or early 2027. Second, the preliminary cohort 2 biomarker observations provide additional data for us to analyze as we complete the trial and move toward our next regulatory discussions. .

And third, as just discussed, we continue to explore the broader potential of the Hemopurifier platform, including in long COVID and in other diseases in which extracellular vesicles may play a role. We remain focused on advancing the Hemopurifier platform through disciplined clinical execution, rigorous analysis of our data and careful capital management. We appreciate your continued interest and support. Thank you for attending our call.

Operator

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

免责声明:本网站提供的信息仅供教育和参考之用,不应视为财务或投资建议。

推荐文章

tradingkey.logo
风险提示:我们的网站和移动应用程序仅提供关于某些投资产品的一般信息。Finsights 不提供财务建议或对任何投资产品的推荐,且提供此类信息不应被解释为 Finsights 提供财务建议或推荐。
投资产品存在重大投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金,且可能并不适合所有人。投资产品的过去表现并不代表其未来表现。
Finsights 可能允许第三方广告商或关联公司在我们的网站或移动应用程序的任何部分放置或投放广告,并可能根据您与广告的互动情况获得报酬。
© 版权所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版权所有