Cuộc gọi công bố kết quả kinh doanh quý 3/2026 của Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC): NII đủ chi trả cổ tức, NAV tăng

Blue Owl Capital Corporation (NYSE: OBDC) công bố thu nhập đầu tư ròng điều chỉnh quý 3/2026 đạt 0,33 USD/cổ phiếu, đủ bù đắp mức cổ tức cơ sở 0,31 USD. Giá trị tài sản ròng (NAV) tăng lên 14,32 USD/cổ phiếu do định giá danh mục đầu tư được cải thiện và các đợt mua lại cổ phiếu gia tăng giá trị đã bù đắp cho môi trường giao dịch thỏa thuận vốn vẫn còn trầm lắng.

Những điểm nhấn chính

• Thu nhập đầu tư ròng điều chỉnh đạt 0,33 USD/cổ phiếu, cao hơn mức cổ tức cơ sở 0,31 USD. Hội đồng quản trị cũng công bố mức cổ tức bổ sung 0,01 USD/cổ phiếu.
• NAV tăng lên 14,32 USD/cổ phiếu từ mức 14,26 USD. OBDC đã mua lại 35 triệu USD cổ phiếu trong quý, đóng góp thêm 0,02 USD/cổ phiếu vào NAV.
• Các cam kết đầu tư mới vượt 890 triệu USD, với hơn 700 triệu USD đã được giải ngân. Biên lãi suất bình quân gia quyền đối với các khoản đầu tư lãi suất thả nổi mới tăng lên 5,2% từ mức 4,8% trong quý 4/2025.
• Các chỉ số tín dụng duy trì ổn định. Nợ không ghi nhận lãi chiếm 0,8% danh mục đầu tư theo giá trị hợp lý, và không có tổ chức phát hành mới nào phát sinh trong quý.
• Ban lãnh đạo cho biết quý 3 đánh dấu bước ngoặt về lợi nhuận khi biên lãi suất mở rộng hơn bắt đầu đi vào danh mục và lãi suất cơ sở cao hơn hỗ trợ thu nhập từ các khoản đầu tư lãi suất thả nổi.
• OBDC kết thúc quý với tỷ lệ đòn bẩy ròng 1,13 lần và thanh khoản khoảng 3,6 tỷ USD, tạo dư địa cho các khoản đầu tư mới và tiếp tục mua lại cổ phiếu.

Dữ liệu tài chính quan trọng

Hoạt động kinh doanh và hiệu quả danh mục đầu tư

Các cam kết đầu tư mới vượt 890 triệu USD và tổng số vốn giải ngân đạt hơn 700 triệu USD. Hơn 50% số vốn giải ngân thuộc về các bên vay hiện hữu, trong khi các khoản cấp vốn mới bao gồm 14 công ty. Các khoản hoàn trả đạt khoảng 634 triệu USD, khiến đòn bẩy nhìn chung không đổi.

Biên lãi suất của các khoản đầu tư lãi suất thả nổi mới đạt 5,2%, so với mức 4,8% trong quý 4/2025. OBDC dẫn chứng khoản tài trợ bổ sung cho Big Brand Tire & Service như một ví dụ về lợi thế từ bên vay hiện hữu. Cả khoản vay mới và khoản vay hiện hữu đều được định giá ở mức S+575, tăng từ mức S+450 trước đó.

Các công ty trong danh mục đầu tư ghi nhận mức tăng trưởng doanh thu và EBITDA so với cùng kỳ năm trước ở mức một chữ số tầm trung. Danh mục đầu tư bao gồm 233 công ty thuộc 29 ngành, với quy mô vị thế trung bình khoảng 40 điểm cơ bản. Các khoản vay có bảo đảm ưu tiên chiếm 79% giá trị hợp lý.

Hệ số khả năng thanh toán lãi vay của bên vay duy trì ở mức khoảng 2 lần, đòn bẩy ròng trung bình của các công ty trong danh mục đầu tư là 5,9 lần và tỷ lệ cho vay trên giá trị tài sản (LTV) đạt khoảng 47%. Các khoản đầu tư trong danh sách theo dõi được xếp hạng từ 3 đến 5 chiếm khoảng 9,4% giá trị hợp lý, nằm trong biên độ lịch sử của ban lãnh đạo.

Thu nhập trả bằng hiện vật (PIK) giảm xuống còn 9,9% tổng thu nhập đầu tư từ mức 10,7% trong quý trước và hơn 13% hai năm trước đó. Ban lãnh đạo cho biết lượng tiền mặt thu hồi từ PIK từ đầu năm đến nay đã vượt quá số dồn tích PIK, phản ánh các khoản hoàn trả và việc hiện thực hóa các vị thế hiện có.

Ngành phần mềm chiếm khoảng 18% danh mục đầu tư. Ban lãnh đạo đánh giá đây là một trong những lĩnh vực hoạt động hiệu quả nhất của OBDC, với mức định giá tăng nhẹ cùng đà tăng trưởng doanh thu và EBITDA tiếp tục được duy trì. Các khoản đầu tư này chủ yếu là các khoản vay có bảo đảm ưu tiên quyền thế chấp thứ nhất cấp cho các công ty phần mềm doanh nghiệp đóng vai trò trọng yếu có EBITDA bình quân gia quyền trên 300 triệu USD.

Sau khi kết thúc quý, OBDC đã xử lý xong một số vị thế nợ không ghi nhận lãi lớn hơn, bao gồm National Dentex, QC Supply và Loparex. Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến tác động tiêu cực bổ sung lên NAV (nếu có) sẽ rất hạn chế vì các mức định giá cuối quý đã phản ánh các kết quả dự kiến này.

Triển vọng từ ban lãnh đạo

Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến đợt tăng lãi suất trong tháng 9 sẽ bắt đầu đóng góp vào lợi nhuận trong quý 4 do độ trễ điều chỉnh lãi suất đối với các khoản vay của OBDC. Với 95% khoản đầu tư nợ áp dụng lãi suất thả nổi, công ty ước tính rằng việc tăng lãi suất cơ sở thêm 100 điểm cơ bản sẽ đóng góp thêm khoảng 0,02 USD/cổ phiếu vào lợi nhuận hàng quý, trong điều kiện các yếu tố khác không đổi.

OBDC cũng kỳ vọng biên lãi suất nới rộng hơn ở các khoản đầu tư mới được giải ngân sẽ mang lại mức đóng góp lợi nhuận ngày càng tăng theo thời gian. Ban lãnh đạo cho biết cổ tức cơ sở vẫn được bảo đảm nhờ mức bù đắp lợi nhuận hiện tại, lãi suất cơ sở cao hơn và thu nhập tích lũy thặng dư (spillover income).

Đối với các bên vay, ban lãnh đạo ước tính việc lãi suất tăng thêm 100 điểm cơ bản nữa sẽ làm giảm hệ số khả năng thanh toán lãi vay từ khoảng 2 lần xuống khoảng 1,8 lần. Mức này vẫn sẽ cao hơn mức đáy 1,6 lần từng được ghi nhận khi lãi suất SOFR vượt 5% trong năm 2023 và 2024.

Công ty dự định tiếp tục cân đối giữa hoạt động mua lại cổ phiếu với các khoản đầu tư mới dựa trên mức đòn bẩy, tình hình trả nợ, danh mục cấp vốn tiềm năng và mức chiết khấu giao dịch của OBDC. Ban lãnh đạo cũng có kế hoạch giải ngân dần vào 8 khoản đầu tư liên doanh và vốn cổ phần chuyên biệt, hiện chiếm tổng cộng hơn 13% danh mục đầu tư.

Rủi ro và các yếu tố cần theo dõi

• Dòng giao dịch do các quỹ bảo trợ (sponsored deal flow) vẫn ở dưới mức lịch sử do hoạt động thoái vốn của các quỹ đầu tư tư nhân và các thương vụ mua lại bằng vốn vay (LBO) mới tiếp tục trầm lắng. Dẫu vậy, ban lãnh đạo vẫn nhận thấy các cơ hội tái tài trợ, cấp vốn bổ sung và từ các bên vay hiện hữu.
• Lãi suất cao hơn mang lại lợi ích cho thu nhập từ lãi suất thả nổi của OBDC nhưng lại làm tăng chi phí nghĩa vụ trả nợ cho các bên vay. Ban lãnh đạo hiện đánh giá tác động đối với danh mục đầu tư vẫn ở mức có thể kiểm soát được.
• Hơn 1 tỷ USD trái phiếu không bảo đảm sẽ đáo hạn trong 12 tháng tới. Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến chi phí lãi vay sẽ tăng đôi chút khi các trái phiếu lãi suất cố định phát hành trong thời kỳ lãi suất gần bằng 0 đáo hạn, nhưng điều này sẽ được bù đắp một phần nhờ biên lãi suất tài trợ có bảo đảm thấp hơn.
• Các khoản đầu tư Nhóm 3 tăng từ 7,2% lên 8,5%. Ban lãnh đạo cho biết biến động này phản ánh một vài đợt hạ bậc mang tính phòng ngừa rủi ro hơn là xu hướng suy giảm trên diện rộng; các khoản đầu tư được xếp hạng 4 và 5 vẫn ở dưới mức 1% danh mục đầu tư.
• Ban lãnh đạo xác định việc sàng lọc tín dụng là rủi ro hiện hữu hàng đầu của OBDC. Các yếu tố không chắc chắn khác bao gồm biến động của lãi suất cơ sở, sự thu hẹp biên lãi suất và các điều kiện kinh tế vĩ mô không đồng đều.
• Hiệu quả hoạt động của mảng phần mềm vẫn mạnh mẽ, nhưng ban lãnh đạo lưu ý sự không chắc chắn vẫn tiếp diễn liên quan đến tác động của trí tuệ nhân tạo đối với định giá phần mềm và các hoạt động thoái vốn của quỹ đầu tư tư nhân.

Những điểm nổi bật trong phiên hỏi đáp với chuyên viên phân tích

Quỹ đạo lợi nhuận: Ban lãnh đạo đồng tình rằng lợi nhuận dường như đang ở hoặc gần mức đáy và kỳ vọng sẽ có sự cải thiện khi lãi suất cơ sở cao hơn cùng biên lãi suất cấp vốn mới mở rộng hơn lan tỏa qua danh mục đầu tư.

Định giá danh mục đầu tư: OBDC II đã thoái vốn hoặc nhận được các khoản hoàn trả đối với khoảng 1 tỷ USD các khoản đầu tư kể từ đầu năm, tương đương hơn 60% danh mục 1,6 tỷ USD trước đây. Mọi thương vụ thoái vốn đều diễn ra ở mức bằng hoặc cao hơn giá trị sổ sách. Ban lãnh đạo cho biết sự trùng lặp đáng kể với OBDC củng cố niềm tin vào các mức định giá danh mục đầu tư của OBDC.

Tái tài trợ và thanh khoản: OBDC sở hữu năng lực tài trợ vốn lớn hơn nhu cầu hiện tại, bao gồm khoảng 3,6 tỷ USD thanh khoản. Ban lãnh đạo sẽ đánh giá cả thị trường có bảo đảm lẫn không bảo đảm khi tái tài trợ cho các khoản nợ sắp đáo hạn.

Mua lại cổ phiếu: OBDC sẽ tiếp tục xem cổ phiếu của chính mình như một phương án đầu tư thay thế bên cạnh các khoản cho vay mới. Công ty áp dụng kế hoạch mua lại theo Quy tắc 10b-18 thay vì kế hoạch 10b5-1, giới hạn việc mua lại trong các khung thời gian giao dịch mở.

Mức độ phơi nhiễm với trung tâm dữ liệu: Các khoản đầu tư liên quan đến trung tâm dữ liệu chỉ chiếm hơn 1% danh mục đầu tư và bao gồm tài trợ thiết bị có bảo đảm, bao gồm hệ thống phát điện và GPU với các đơn vị bao tiêu theo hợp đồng đạt mức xếp hạng tín nhiệm đầu tư. OBDC không nắm giữ các khoản đầu tư phát triển trung tâm dữ liệu hoặc đầu tư vốn cổ phần.

Điều kiện tín dụng: Ban lãnh đạo báo cáo không có sự gia tăng đáng kể nào về các trường hợp vỡ nợ, tái cơ cấu hoặc hoạt động sửa đổi điều khoản. Một số công ty trong danh sách theo dõi cho thấy sự ổn định hoặc xu hướng doanh thu cải thiện, trong khi phần lớn danh mục đầu tư vẫn duy trì ổn định.

Toàn văn biên bản cuộc gọi công bố kết quả kinh doanh

Toàn văn cuộc gọi công bố kết quả kinh doanh

Phần trình bày của ban lãnh đạo

Operator

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Blue Owl Capital Corporation's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Mike Mosticchio, Head of BDC Investor Relations. Mike, please go ahead.

Michael Mosticchio

Thank you, operator, and welcome to Blue Owl Capital Corporation's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are Craig Packer, Chief Executive Officer; Logan Nicholson, President; and Jonathan Lamm, Chief Financial Officer.

I'd like to remind listeners that remarks made during today's call may contain forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are outside of the company's control. Actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described in OBDC's filings with the SEC. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. We'd also like to remind everyone that we will refer to non-GAAP measures on the call, which are reconciled to GAAP figures in our earnings presentation available on the Events and Presentations section of our website.

Certain information discussed on this call and in the company's earnings materials, including information related to portfolio companies, was derived from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. The company makes no such representations or warranties with respect to this information. Yesterday, OBDC issued its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, reporting adjusted net investment income of $0.33 per share and net asset value of $14.32 per share. All materials referenced during today's call, including the earnings press release, earnings presentation and 10-Q are available on the News and Events section of OBDC's website.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Craig.

Craig Packer

Thanks, Mike, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. We are very pleased with this quarter's results. Earnings more than covered the dividend. NAV is up. Our borrowers continue to perform well, and our balance sheet remains healthy.

In the third quarter, OBDC generated adjusted net investment income of $0.33 per share that comfortably covered our base dividend of $0.31 per share and resulted in an annualized ROE of approximately 9.2%. Based on these results, we also declared a supplemental dividend of $0.01 per share, consistent with our framework that allows shareholders to benefit from earnings in excess of our base dividend. Net asset value per share was up modestly at the end of the quarter to $14.32 from $14.26. The improvement in market sentiment drove tighter spreads and higher portfolio marks, while credit quality remained strong, including across our software borrowers.

Importantly, there were no new issuers added to nonaccrual this quarter. Together, our earnings and growth in NAV resulted in a net income ROE of 10.3%. We continued to repurchase shares during the quarter, buying back $35 million in stock, which was accretive to NAV per share and bringing our total repurchases over the past year to $254 million. We remain focused on deploying capital where we see the greatest opportunity to drive value for our shareholders, thoughtfully balancing the accretive impact of share repurchases with attractive new investment opportunities.

Turning to the market environment. The stabilization in direct lending that we described last quarter is starting to be reflected in valuations, NAV stability and earnings. While deal activity remained relatively light during the quarter, we continue to benefit from improved market economics as deployment modestly increased. Weighted average spreads on new investment commitments increased from last quarter, while our scaled portfolio continued to generate attractive opportunities through incumbent borrowers.

Looking at the rate environment, the Fed raised rates by 25 basis points in September, its first increase since 2023, and the forward curve now points to a higher for longer environment. Given the predominantly floating rate nature of our portfolio, these higher rates should be a net benefit to our earnings as these loans reset. For our borrowers, we believe the impact of higher debt service costs is very manageable. Rates were more than 100 basis points higher just 2 years ago, and the portfolio at that time performed well throughout the period.

Importantly, we continue to see strong credit quality and portfolio performance even through the volatility this year. We diligently monitor for early signs of credit stress, which remain very limited across the portfolio. In fact, several of our existing watch list names we have been following most closely showed modest improvement in operating performance, which is encouraging at a time when we are seeing greater dispersion in credit performance across the broader industry. That performance reinforces our conviction that disciplined underwriting, thoughtful portfolio construction and the depth of our team remain critical differentiators, particularly in an uncertain credit environment.

Taken together, our earnings outlook has reached an inflection point. Wider spreads are beginning to flow into the portfolio, while higher base rates should provide an additional tailwind over the coming quarters.

Now I will turn the call over to Logan to provide more details on our investment activity and portfolio performance.

Logan Nicholson

Thanks, Craig. Starting with investment activity, regular way sponsored deal flow continues to remain below historical levels, although activity has picked up since last quarter, and we continue to find attractive opportunities across our existing portfolio. New investment commitments came in at over $890 million with fundings of over $700 million. Over 50% of fundings were to incumbent borrowers with origination activity spread across 14 new names.

As Craig mentioned earlier, we began to see the improved economics that we've discussed in recent quarters flow through our funded activity with the weighted average spread of our new floating rate investments increasing to 5.2%, up from 4.8% since the fourth quarter of last year. Repayments totaled approximately $634 million during the quarter. This volume was in line with historical levels, although down compared to recent years where opportunistic refinancings drove repayment activity higher. Even at this pace, approximately 15% of our portfolio has turned over year-to-date, providing additional capacity to redeploy capital into new investments at attractive spreads. Taken together, repayments mostly offset new fundings this quarter, resulting in net leverage of 1.13x, roughly in line with last quarter.

Importantly, we don't need a significant pickup in broader deal activity to capture today's more attractive spreads. Our existing portfolio can create opportunities to deploy additional capital through refinancings, add-ons and new transactions with companies where we have deep existing relationships. Our investment in Big Brand Tire & Service this quarter provides a good example of this incumbency benefit. We know the auto services sector well, including through our prior investment in Mavis Tire, which we discussed last quarter.

We first invested in Big Brand last year. And during the third quarter of this year, we provided additional financing to support an add-on acquisition for the business, creating one of the largest auto-service platforms in the country. As part of the transaction, both our new and existing loans were priced at S+ 575, up from S+ 450 previously, reflecting broader widening in market spreads and the benefit of having scale, incumbency and deep market expertise. Big Brand continues to grow and perform well, benefiting both our debt investment and equity co-investment, which is now marked well above our cost.

Turning to the portfolio. Our borrowers continue to perform well with revenue and EBITDA growing again in the mid-single digits year-over-year. We also saw a greater percentage of companies that met or exceeded our earnings expectations this quarter, reinforcing the strength we see across the portfolio. We continue to keep an eye on broader macro trends, including higher rates, elevated energy prices and areas of the economy where consumer trends are mixed. And these pressures have had minimal impact across our portfolio to date. As a reminder, we have limited exposure to these more cyclical areas such as certain consumer-facing industries or building products. Our resilience reflects our focus on larger companies in defensive industries, which tend to benefit from more stable demand and diversified revenue streams.

OBDC remains highly diversified across 233 companies in 29 industries with an average position size of approximately 40 basis points and 79% of the portfolio at fair value invested in senior secured loans. Credit metrics were stable this quarter with nonaccruals constant at 0.8% at fair value. There were no new issuers added to nonaccrual this quarter, only one additional tranche of an existing name already on nonaccrual. It's also worth mentioning that subsequent to quarter end, we resolved several of our larger nonaccrual positions, including National Dentex, QC Supply and Loparex. We have been actively managing these situations for some time and are pleased to have reached their resolutions.

Importantly, our marks as of quarter end already reflected our visibility on these outcomes, so we expect limited, if any, future impact to NAV. Borrower interest coverage is in line with last quarter at approximately 2x, while revolver utilization and amendment activity remains steady. Portfolio company net leverage averaged 5.9x and LTVs remained stable at approximately 47%, reflecting significant equity cushions beneath our loans. Our watch list remained in line with historical averages with 3 to 5 rated names at approximately 9.4% of the portfolio at fair value.

We believe our borrowers remain well positioned for higher rates, even with another 100 basis point increase and holding all else equal, interest coverage would remain around 1.8x, above the 1.6x trough level our portfolio managed through when SOFR was over 5% in 2023 and 2024. PIK income declined to 9.9% of total investment income this quarter, down from 10.7% last quarter and from peak levels of more than 13% 2 years ago. As a reminder, the vast majority of our PIK was structured at inception rather than added through amendments related to credit stress, and these investments continue to perform as expected.

Our software exposure represents approximately 18% of the portfolio and continues to be one of our strongest performing areas with modestly higher marks this quarter. As a reminder, our investments remain primarily first lien senior secured loans to large mission-critical enterprise software companies with a weighted average EBITDA of over $300 million.

Looking ahead, we remain encouraged by the resilience of our portfolio and the progress we're making on the credits we're actively managing. Our modest leverage provides flexibility to capitalize on increasingly favorable market conditions for lenders.

Now I'll turn it over to Jonathan to review our financial results.

Jonathan Lamm

Thank you, Logan. In the third quarter, OBDC earned adjusted NII of $0.33 per share, exceeding the base dividend of $0.31 per share. Earnings benefited primarily from elevated dividend income, while nonrecurring fee income was more modest than last quarter and slightly below long-term averages. The Board declared a fourth quarter base dividend of $0.31 per share, which will be paid on January 15 to shareholders of record as of December 31 and a supplemental dividend of $0.01 per share, which will be paid on December 15 to shareholders of record as of November 30.

Looking ahead, higher base rates and the wider spreads on new commitments should provide an additional tailwind in the coming quarters. To put this potential impact into perspective, with 95% of our debt investments floating rate and all else equal, a 100 basis point rise in base rates would increase quarterly earnings by approximately $0.02.

Given the lag in how our loans reset, we expect the benefit from the September rate hike to begin flowing through in the fourth quarter. With earnings covering the dividend, additional support from higher base rates and spillover income, we believe the dividend remains well supported.

Moving to the balance sheet. Third quarter NAV per share was $14.32, up from $14.26 last quarter. The increase was driven by improved portfolio marks and accretive share repurchases. In the third quarter, we repurchased $35 million of stock, which was accretive to NAV per share by $0.02. We ended the quarter with approximately $195 million of remaining capacity under our current $300 million repurchase authorization.

Net leverage was 1.13x at quarter end within our target range of 0.9 to 1.25x, driven by repayments mostly in line with new fundings as well as allocating capital to repurchasing shares.

Looking at our capital structure. In September, we closed a $292 million CLO at an attractive spread of SOFR plus 160 basis points, marginally reducing our cost of secured financing while maintaining a diverse funding mix. Total liquidity, including cash and undrawn capacity on our credit facilities remains robust at approximately $3.6 billion, comfortably exceeding our unfunded commitments. Our diversified funding sources and staggered maturity schedule position us well to deploy prudently as opportunities arise. Overall, we remain pleased with the strength of our balance sheet and the financial flexibility it affords us to take advantage of the current market environment.

Now I will turn it over to Craig for some closing remarks.

Craig Packer

Thanks, Jonathan. A year ago, sentiment toward private credit shifted meaningfully as investors became increasingly concerned that credit issues would begin to emerge across the asset class. That change in sentiment created significant volatility for BDC stock prices, including OBDC. One year later, we believe OBDC's performance has demonstrated the quality and durability of the portfolio. Our borrowers continue to perform well with healthy earnings growth, while credit quality remained strong with nonaccruals at just 0.8% of the portfolio at fair value.

Taking a step back, that resilience has been a hallmark of OBDC over a much longer period. NAV per share has remained stable over the past decade, while our annualized loss rate has averaged just 33 basis points, below broader industry rates. As another validation of our NAV and valuations, I think it is helpful to provide an update on OBDC II, particularly given the high overlap with OBDC. As you may recall, we have been pursuing a path to return capital to OBDC II shareholders, which has resulted in significant realization activity this year.

Since the beginning of the year, we have now exited approximately $1 billion of investments, representing more than 60% of OBDC II's portfolio across all or a portion of approximately 130 investments, reducing the portfolio from approximately $1.6 billion to $600 million. That includes over $450 million of additional repayments following the asset sale we completed earlier this year.

Importantly, every single exit has been at or above our marks. Because each of these investments is also held by OBDC, we believe this provides clear validation of the quality and valuation of these positions in OBDC's portfolio. As we look ahead, we believe OBDC is well positioned for the coming quarters. Investments originated at wider spreads are now funding and beginning to contribute to earnings. That benefit should build over time as we deploy additional capital, while higher base rates should provide another tailwind as our existing loans reset.

At the same time, credit quality remains strong and with leverage within our target range and ample liquidity, we have the flexibility to deploy into attractive opportunities while remaining selective. As we discussed at our recent Analyst Day, that flexibility is supported by a deep experienced team and a disciplined underwriting and portfolio management process that has been refined over many years. We believe that combination of portfolio quality, improving earnings power and a strong balance sheet positions us well to continue driving long-term value for shareholders. Thank you for your time today. We will now open the line for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from Chris Muller from Citizens Capital Markets.

Phần hỏi đáp

Christopher Muller

Congrats on a nice quarter here. So, I guess, yields, ROEs, spreads, NAV all inflected higher in the quarter. Is it fair to assume that at least on the earnings side, we're at or near a trough for earnings, especially with the September rate hike not fully reflected in third quarter results?

Craig Packer

Chris, look, I think that we tried to highlight in our prepared comments that we're -- we feel very good about the outlook. As you said, rates, higher spreads, higher credit quality, stable. So we -- I think your characterization is a good one. We expect things to continue to improve from here.

Christopher Muller

Got it. And then the commentary on OBDC II is very helpful, especially with some price discovery out there. I guess the question is, how can you guys, kind of, close that gap between the underlying valuations and the public stock price? Is it really just putting that data out there so investors can understand it? Or is there anything else you guys can do from your side?

Craig Packer

So, it's a great question, and it's one we spend a lot of time thinking about and maybe beyond the investing, it's certainly right up there in terms of our focus. It's our hope by sharing detailed updates on how OBDC II is performing that, that will get at the core of what we hear concerns from investors on, which is the quality of the NAV and the quality of the marks. And I don't think that's specific to OBDC. I think that's been a general concern around private credit over the last year or so. I think our valuation process is very good. I won't repeat how we do it. We use a third party. But we think here we have at OBDC II, a fund that was $1.6 billion less than a year ago. We've now exited or gotten repaid on $1 billion of the $1.6 billion and every position has come out at our marks. And we think by highlighting that to investors on this call and in individual conversations, given all those names are in OBDC that, that should give investors significantly improved confidence in the quality of the marks.

Obviously, we're trying to do all else we can to communicate the positive trend on earnings, the good fund position, et cetera. But I think the valuation point has been one that's been concerning to investors. And we think there's no better demonstration than sales and repayments at book value. And we did the initial asset sale, and that was $600 million. There were some that said, well, it's not enough. Now we've done another $450 million in very short order, and all of that capital has been returned to OBDC II investors at book value. So we're going to continue to work very closely with OBDC's Board and do all we can to close this discount. But I think that it's understandable this year given all the scrutiny and the concern. But as we and some of the other funds continue to perform well, we hope that those discounts will narrow.

Operator

Our next question is coming from Jason Stewart from Compass Point.

Dylan Ritter

Dylan Ritter here for Jason. It looks like there's over $1 billion of unsecured notes coming due over the next 12 months. So how are you thinking about refinancing them? And what increase in interest costs should we assume versus what's rolling off given where rates are today and headed?

Jonathan Lamm

No, thanks for the question. We've done a fair amount in terms of unsecured over the course of this year with some -- obviously, some positions, some notes maturing. And so we feel like we're in a very good position to be opportunistic around certainly the near-term refinancings. We're north of 52% in unsecured, so well north of where we would need to be. And so we'll take a look at the unsecured market and certainly look at secured and secured is going -- is generally going to be cheaper, and we'll make the decisions then.

The most important point is that we have way more financing now than we possibly need. We've got over $3.6 billion of cash and available liquidity relative to a much lower number of unfunded commitments. In terms of some of the cost questions that you've highlighted, there are some notes that are coming off this year, and we've talked about that in prior scripts and calls where we had fixed rate notes going back to the 0 rate environment. So, you will see a little bit of a tick up there, but we've been talking about all the other things that we've done to lower financing costs, in particular, on the spread side in secured in order to offset that.

Dylan Ritter

Great. And then as a follow-up, how do you feel about where leverage stands today, especially as you continue to repurchase stock? And how are you guys balancing that with growing the portfolio?

Craig Packer

I think we're in a great spot. I think we like where we are from a leverage standpoint. I think it gives us flexibility if we see an especially good origination quarter to take advantage of that. I think that we are properly using leverage to make sure we're generating returns. So, I think it's ideal and gives us -- if we were a little higher, a little lower, I think that would be fine as well. But I think I like where we are.

Operator

Our next question is coming from Robert Dodd from Raymond James.

Robert Dodd

First, thanks for the detail on OBDC II. I mean it's -- some of that's in the 8-Ks, obviously, but I appreciate that and the color. Moving on to the outlook and less -- I'm not going to ask you to predict M&A because we've all got our fingers burnt on that. More the correlation obviously between rising rates is good for earnings. We've seen a rising rate cycle before that wasn't, frankly, that bad for credit, I don't think. But I mean, what's your view on how the portfolio companies themselves, some of them are new since the rate cycle, some of them are pre-rate cycle, but they've been through a rate cycle now.

How do you think the portfolio companies are set to handle a rising rate cycle? I mean it looks like it might be 100 basis points this time, not 500 again, but I'm just trying to get your view on how that shakes out on a credit quality when -- I mean, rates are already going up, but if they peak in the mid- to high 4s.

Logan Nicholson

Sure. Thanks, Robert, for the question. It's Logan. Look, we think they're set up really nicely. A couple of key stats just to reiterate from earlier, we think at 2x interest coverage today, even with that full 100 basis points, we would only drop about halfway back to the trough interest coverage levels. So, companies are set up really well today.

I'd also point out that going back to the last rate cycle, we were coming off a period of time post COVID where there were a lot of other inflationary pressures that were fairly acute like labor cost inflation, commodity price inflation. And so there was a lot more going on under the surface in those portfolio companies, and they all managed it really well. We did not see a material uptick in defaults there. And so, I feel like with the strength in the portfolio today and where it sits today from a cash flow coverage standpoint, we're set up quite nicely. And as you know, the forward curve currently shows SOFR topping out around 4.6%, which is significantly inside of where it topped out last cycle at around 5.25%.

Robert Dodd

Got it. And on, kind of, like you have asked about the strategic opportunities in the portfolio, and you've added several different types of cross-asset opportunities, et cetera. I mean, is there any update on those or the same, kind of, target range? I mean that's obviously those more specialized areas where you have expertise may be more defensible than some of the pure, I don't want to say, commodity direct lending, but there's an element to that. But so any update on your view on that mix going forward?

Logan Nicholson

Yes. I think we continue to like our 8 different JV and specialty equity investments that we have across the portfolio. We continue to deploy into them and like the returns. The returns across the group from an ROE perspective have been in the low double digits consistently. And there's no change to that today. So we'd like to continue to grow it today. If you look at all 8 together, they represent just over 13% of OBDC. And I think adding a percentage point or 2 would be something we'd continue to look to do in any given year. So slow, steady and disciplined deployment to grow that book is our goal.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from Arren Cyganovich from Truist Securities.

Arren Cyganovich

We've been hearing that the upper middle market has been generally more attractive than it had been assuming from the slower flows going into nontraded BDCs. Are you still seeing, kind of, the same level of spread widening, documentation improvements, leverage levels? Or is that starting to get competed away as folks are starting to really look into the upper middle market again?

Craig Packer

I think it's an attractive environment to invest in upper middle market direct lending. Spreads are wider. I think deals generally are coming at reasonable leverage with good documentation as they always do and as they have for years. The -- as you sort of pointed out, as the industry has had outflows out of the nontraded funds, that creates better supply-demand characteristics for the public BDCs that aren't subject to those outflows. So, I think that creates a better environment. I think that we are -- the M&A environment is modest. And I think we -- a pickup in M&A, sponsor M&A would help, but there's enough activity for us to continue to deploy and take advantage of these wider spreads, and we highlighted that in the script, that could be through add-ons or refis. We can do it from our existing portfolio companies.

So, I feel really good about upper middle market lending and where we can deploy capital in all the components, economic, structural, the types of credits that we can finance. I think this is a good environment.

Arren Cyganovich

Great. On the dividend income side, you had a nice pop this quarter, and it was attributed to a strategic equity investment. Can you highlight what that was? And is that something that is recurring? Or is that more of a, just, kind of, onetime dividend that was paid to OBDC?

Logan Nicholson

Sure. So the bulk of our dividend income is recurring. We did have a specific transaction for Moore, where the company went about a share buyback transaction as part of that accelerated a little bit of income. So there was a slight bump of $0.01 to $0.02 in our income across the dividends this quarter that was transactional, but the vast majority of it is recurring in nature. So, there is a transaction-specific bump this quarter. And we've had, as you've heard us talk about with LSI earlier this year, in any given quarter, there's the potential for a transaction that's nonrecurring to bump those dividends up from time to time, but Moore was the specific one this quarter that contributed a couple of pennies.

Operator

Next question is coming from Paul Johnson with KBW.

Paul Johnson

I was wondering just in terms of the specialty investments, what sort of progress, I guess, there's been in terms of data center investments in any of the specialty investments within OBDC.

Logan Nicholson

Sure. We have very -- I'll just maybe segment this a little bit. We don't have any data center equity investments, development investments in OBDC. Where we have participated in small size, altogether, it's just over 1% of the portfolio today. We've done a handful of equipment finance deals, either in our specialty finance business, Wingspire or on our balance sheet at OBDC. And so very small size. Where we have done that, we've tried to focus on equipment like power generation and GPUs with strong contractual investment-grade off-takers. And so we think about it as very strong contractual cash flows on the other side.

And we try to think about it in terms of attractive LTVs with secured collateral and short duration. So, the average duration of our transaction there is around 2 years or less weighted average life for our equipment finance deal. So, we played it selectively. It's very small size in the portfolio in the form of secured equipment finance only, not long-duration data centers. That's not particularly relevant for this fund. It's other pockets at Blue Owl.

Paul Johnson

Got it. Appreciate it and very helpful. And then, I guess in terms of new deployment, you sound pretty optimistic about spreads and appreciate the examples of some refinancing opportunities there to widen out spreads within the book. I guess where does, like, the emphasis fall today in terms of pricing versus the documentation? Like, are you in a position where you're essentially getting both better documentation and the pricing? Or are you leaning a little bit harder on the spread widening the pricing?

Craig Packer

Look, I don't want to sound, sort of, dismissive of the premise, but we don't make investments that we're not comfortable with the documentation. It has been good for 10 years. That's the nature of direct lending. We're very disciplined around that. Certainly, any one deal at any one moment in time, you can get a term that's better, but it's just not something that we relax in any market environment. I would say in terms of our focus, it's not going to sound profound. We're in a really good spot. Our leverage is right in our sweet spot. We're overearning the dividend with the prospect that, that will increase. And it is to a certain level, we're matching deployment to repayments. And we feel we've got a good opportunity each and every quarter to do that based on the existing portfolio companies and new deals to the extent that there's a wider set of opportunities, we will make the optimal choices. We'll pick the best deals that have the best combination. But they'll tend to be, I think, more economic than documentation driven.

But we also like diversification. And so it's not binary. We tend to just -- if there's more opportunities, we'll tend to spread around a little bit. I would say at its core, we are most looking for just high-quality credits to add to the portfolio that come with attractive economics and want to make sure that the capital structure is appropriate and that the documentation protects us. And I think we have seen those. We saw a good amount of them in the most recent quarter, and we continue to see them in our pipeline.

Paul Johnson

Got it. Appreciate that. And then maybe just in terms of the request for PIK on origination, what you've seen there? Has that become less frequent? And that's all for me.

Logan Nicholson

So the request for PIK at origination, it has been a little less frequent, but there's still the market has evolved. Larger cap issuers do seek to have the PIK option as an option in the first couple of years in many of our first lien financings. I think that, that option has been requested on the margin a little less given the rate cycle that we're in is a bit lower today than it was 2 or 3 years ago. But it's still an option that's embedded. What we have seen is borrowers have just elected to use that option with less frequency, and that's because it costs more. You pay a spread premium when you're using that option.

And so, I would say that it's a feature that some of the largest, highest quality borrowers continue to ask for, but we just don't see as much utilization under it today. And then some of our larger PIK investments have paid off in the portfolio. So, the decline in PIK in the portfolio is not just from slightly lower utilization of the existing options, it's from some payoffs. This quarter, we included some disclosure in our cash flow statement that year-to-date shows our PIK cash collections. We broke that line item out.

And if you look at that year-to-date, it's actually greater than our PIK accruals. So, we've actually been monetizing a fair amount of our PIK this year and shows that our PIK loans are performing as we intended and paying off regularly.

Craig Packer

I just want to underscore this for those that aren't going into the detail, our PIK this quarter of investment income percentage PIK is down. It's down the last 2 quarters. It's the lowest level it's been in a year. Now we've gone to great pains in these calls to highlight that we are structuring our PIK intentionally, and we don't see it by itself as an indicator of stress.

But we also know some investors are skeptical about that. And so, I would highlight for those that are skeptical, it's gone down 2 quarters in a row. So, if you believe that's a sign of stress, then you should believe that stress is reduced. Now again, that's not how we see it, but some do. And if you do, this should be welcome news. We use it opportunistically where we get compensated for it. It tends to be the most demanded when there's a robust new deal environment, which we're not in right now. So, we get asked for it from time to time, and we consider it based on the circumstances of the deals.

Operator

Our next question today is coming from Erik Zwick from Lucid Capital Markets.

Erik Zwick

I noticed the percentage of new debt commitments with floating interest rates in 3Q was 81%, so a little bit lower than we would typically see. I'm curious if you're seeing more borrowers that are negotiating for fixed rates given an outlook for, I guess, higher rates possibly or something else that maybe drove that decline in the quarter?

Logan Nicholson

No. We really just had one substantial origination. It was in the GPU asset-backed finance, equipment finance space that I mentioned that was a fixed rate origination with a substantial upfront fee component as well. And so, really just a one-off origination this quarter. It's not something we're seeing change in our traditional corporate direct lending market in terms of fixed versus floating. The vast majority of what we're doing is still going to be floating rate, but we did have one origination in that category of fixed this quarter.

Erik Zwick

Appreciate the color there. And then last one for me. Just, kind of, revisiting the discussion about 3Q being an inflection point on a number of, kind of, key metrics, but looking at it from maybe a different perspective. As a lender of money, you're obviously in the business of managing downside risk. So, as you sit there today, what are the biggest risks to the continued improvement? And how are you managing for them today?

Craig Packer

Look, it's going to sound pretty basic, but the biggest risk for us is always credit selection, and that's something that we've done extremely well. But that's a day in, day out focus is picking the right credits. And I think that, that without repeating our strategy, I think folks are familiar, the world is uncertain. It's always uncertain. And you can all have a view on where the economy is going to go and what the priorities are going to be. We're trying to pick credits that are endure regardless of the general economic conditions. So, I think that's first and foremost.

Again, we've highlighted higher rates will help. And that's just math. If rates are lower, then we won't earn as much. I mean it's not -- there's not, I think, much you can do about that. It's the nature of investing in floating rate loans, which is the nature of what we do. We are, again, having the capacity to take advantage of that is a way to prepare for that, and we have it. I think the spread environment is a good one. Of course, that could reverse. Again, there's -- we can't control that market. But I feel like it's pretty well balanced.

Look, what we're going to be able to do at OBDC is regardless of what we're trying to do, regardless of the economic environment, regardless of those rate and spread environments, we're trying to deliver premium returns, then we can get in the public markets and deliver very consistent dividend, ROE performance and stable NAV growth. That's what we're trying to do. And we do that managing a very diversified portfolio, having very strong liability structures, having a very wide funnel. That's the model, and we think that model has worked well, high rates, low rates and in between. And we're going to continue doing that.

Operator

Our next question today is coming from Derek Hewett from Bank of America.

Derek Hewett

So, I appreciate the additional color or, excuse me, disclosure on whether it was Blue Owl II or the revised disclosure on PIK collections. And most of my questions were already addressed. So, really, I just have a housekeeping issue. And it has to do with the rise in the excise tax on a quarter-over-quarter basis. Any color there on what caused the jump? And then what are your expectations for it going forward?

Jonathan Lamm

We actually would say that on a go-forward basis, it should come down. We just filed our 2025 tax return. And the tax return, obviously, excise tax is driven off of taxable income. And there are true-ups that happen effectively 9 months after you finalize your year. And through those true-ups, you should expect that number to actually trend down on the next quarter basis.

Operator

Our next question today is coming from John Hecht from Jefferies. Please rejoin the queue, John.

Our next question is coming from Mickey Schleien from Clear Street.

Mickey Schleien

A lot of good questions this morning. But I wanted to just quickly ask you about credit quality. Your Category 3 investments increased a bit from 7.2% to 8.5%. Curious what's driving that increase? And are you seeing any broader credit deterioration among your otherwise performing borrowers? And are you seeing any meaningful changes in the performance? I think you talked about this, but I'll just reiterate, are you seeing any meaningful changes in the performance of your weaker credits, particularly in terms of amendments and restructurings, et cetera?

Logan Nicholson

Great. Thanks for the question, Mickey. Look, I think on the 3s to 5s rated 3s specifically, there was a slight increase this quarter, but I would just zoom out a little bit. Over the last 2 years, the 3s to 5s rated category has been between 8% to 10% of the portfolio. So we're, sort of, squarely in the middle of that range in the low 9s. If you look back 3 or 4 years in the 2022, '23 time frame, that category was 10% to 12% of the portfolio. So we add things and take things off of the watch list and downgrade them to 3 periodically and really as a precautionary measure when something underperforms.

There wasn't any specific category or trend in the handful of businesses that we downgraded this quarter, and we had some upgrades as well. So, I really wouldn't say anything out of the ordinary. If you look at the earnings company by company this quarter, as we alluded to in the script, on the margin, more companies exceeded our expectation for the quarter than they did last quarter. And so on the margin, we felt it was a slightly stronger quarter. If you also scrutinize the 4s to 5s rated, the 4s to 5s rated is below 1% of the portfolio, and that's towards the low end of the range.

So, some of the movements in the buckets were in the higher category. Nothing cautionary about the quarter. In fact, on the margin, a little bit better than expectations. And we didn't really see any surprises or any large movements on the watch list in terms of markdowns, any companies hitting the wall. Material amendments were squarely in the middle of the range that we've had for the last 2 years in terms of amendment activity. So, really just nothing out of the ordinary in the portfolio this quarter.

Mickey Schleien

That's really helpful. And my follow-up is regarding share repurchases, which continued in the quarter. Happy to see that. I've been at this a long time, and I've seen share repurchase programs announced and then never executed, but you're doing it. But at the same time, you've reiterated several times that economics on new deals are looking more interesting. So, just curious with the stock still trading below NAV, but these investment opportunities improving, how are you weighing the accretion from additional repurchases against deploying capital into new investments?

Jonathan Lamm

First of all, Mickey, welcome back. Great to have you back on the call after a couple of quarters. So, just on the repurchase plans, I think you're spot on. We weigh it with the consideration of what is our -- where is our current leverage, what do repayments look like, what does the origination pipeline look like? And then, certainly, where is the stock trading? And as you've seen, we've purchased a fair amount of stock back over the course of the last 9 months or so, and we've continued to do that.

You should expect us to continue to look at the stock as another investment opportunity alongside other attractive investment opportunities, and you should expect us to continue to look at it and look at those things really balanced side by side. The only point that I would make on the repurchase plan is that we do want it and have valued it, notwithstanding the fact that we've bought back more stock in our plans than really, I think, any other BDC platform, we do not run a 10b5-1 plan. We run a 10b-18 plan. And so we're only open during certain windows. And so that does limit us to only certain periods of time purchasing stock. But during those periods, as you've seen, we've been active, and you should expect us to continue to be looking at those opportunities.

Operator

Our next question is coming from John Hecht from Jefferies.

John Hecht

Most of my questions have also been asked and answered. I'm wondering at this part of the rate cycle and thinking about the forward curve, maybe do you guys have a sense for the trajectory of repayment or prepayment rates, how sensitive portfolio companies are to higher rates with that?

Craig Packer

Look, I -- obviously, there are several factors that go into when there are repayments. Companies, private equity firms generally don't wait until the last year or so. They want to get ahead of that. So with the maturity schedule is a forcing function. On average, our loans get repaid in 3 or 4 years. Exits or significant acquisitions will drive prepayments and rates will certainly be a factor. But I'd say it's not the driving factor. It tends to be more corporate finance decisions made at the company.

We're -- at the risk of stating the obvious, we're a floating rate lender. And so they're paying SOFR regardless of where rates are. And so unless they swap it, which most don't, but some do, even if you capture a really low rate when you happen to do your financing, 2 years later, rates are higher, you're paying a higher rate. So, I don't think the rate environment itself is going to drive activity. I think M&A activity picking up will drive activity.

But bottom line is, I think we made a comment in the script, 15% of the portfolio has turned over in the first part of this year. So it gives you a sense. And I expect you'll continue to see regular prepayments, refinancings even if rates are higher.

John Hecht

Okay. That's super helpful. And then, in the prepared remarks, you guys said the portfolio companies are showing good fundamental trends, and there was even you've observed some upside in a portion of the portfolio relative to your internal forecast. Can you characterize where that's coming from? I mean is it on the revenue side? Is it on the expense side generally? Or is it more industry specific?

Logan Nicholson

I think it's some of our watch list names. We saw a handful of our watch list names stabilize a bit and a couple of them with some positive revenue trends. So, I don't want to call any single name out, but it was a positive quarter in terms of stabilization in a handful of names that were on the watch list. As I said before, no real material surprises or large markdowns or large misses that weren't otherwise already expected.

So, it was really some -- maybe some green shoots in the watch list of some revenue turning and some inflection points in those names. And really just stability in the rest. The other 91% of the book, just really continuing to be stable, no real surprises there either. So again, as we go through portfolio reviews, we try to think about where we expect things to come, where companies have budgeted for the year, how they've guided us for the next quarter. And on the margin, this was a slightly better quarter in terms of performance financially for our portfolio.

Operator

Next question today is coming from Christopher Nolan from Ladenburg Thalmann.

Christopher Nolan

Craig, in your comments, you mentioned deal flows below historic levels. Can you give us an update in terms of why you think that might be the case right now?

Craig Packer

I think it's pretty broadly documented. Private equity activity is below historical levels. And so, we're -- obviously, our deal flow is in part driven by private equity activity. And there's a lot that's been written about this. But generally, I think private equity firms have had a tougher time exiting at valuations they find attractive. They're keeping companies longer. There's been significant growth in the continuation vehicle market for sponsors keeping their companies.

So, generally, it's been just a lower exit environment for private equity firms resulting in a lower new deal environment. Again, when I say new deals, I mean a brand-new LBO as opposed to a refinancing of one of our credits or an add-on to one of our portfolio companies.

Christopher Nolan

Great. And with all that in mind, given the increase in software exposure and given the recovery in valuations for software, should we expect a wave of private equity exits from their software investments and for OBDC, could that portend some realized gains down the road?

Craig Packer

I mean I think that question will be better directed to the private equity firms than us. I would say while there's been some recovery in sentiment around software, public software stocks and loans, and we're seeing some recovery in our marks. I think there's still some uncertainty around AI impact on software. And so, I don't think, I suspect, we haven't seen enough of a recovery that's going to result in a significant pickup. But look, our software businesses are doing really well. Their operating performance remains strong. It's one of our best-performing sectors on an operating basis, revenues and EBITDA growth.

So, we feel good about the companies we have. We feel good about the loans that we have. And I'm pleased with the direction. I'm pleased with the markets, I think, evolving more balanced appreciation for software. I think it's probably a little bit longer to where that results in exits, but there'll be a few.

Operator

We reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over for any further or closing comments.

Craig Packer

All right. Thanks, everyone, for joining. We're coming up on time. We really felt great about the quarter and I think we delivered on all fronts. And hopefully, the comments today gave you a sense of our confidence and enthusiasm for the future. We're always reachable for follow-up questions from anyone. Just reach out. We'd be pleased to hear from you. And with that, thank you.

Operator

Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.