Cuộc họp công bố kết quả kinh doanh Q3 2026 của Intel: Tăng trưởng DCAI và Triển vọng Q4

Điểm tin chính

• Intel đã báo cáo doanh thu quý 3 năm 2026 đạt 16,5 tỷ USD, biên lợi nhuận gộp phi GAAP đạt 44,1% và EPS phi GAAP đạt 0,52 USD, vượt dự báo của chính công ty ở cả ba chỉ số.
• Doanh thu của Trung tâm Dữ liệu và AI (DCAI) đạt 7,3 tỷ USD, tăng 17% so với quý trước và gần 80% so với cùng kỳ năm ngoái, nhờ nhu cầu cơ sở hạ tầng AI và nguồn cung CPU máy chủ cải thiện đã thúc đẩy tăng trưởng.
• Doanh thu của Nhóm Sản phẩm Máy tính Cá nhân (CCPG) giảm 9% so với quý trước xuống 8,1 tỷ USD. Intel cho rằng sự sụt giảm này là do giá bộ nhớ tăng cao, ngân sách IT hạn chế và đợt điều chỉnh tồn kho PC gia tăng tốc độ.
• Doanh thu của Intel Foundry tăng 16% so với quý trước lên 6,7 tỷ USD, trong khi khoản lỗ hoạt động được cải thiện 236 triệu USD xuống còn 1,9 tỷ USD. Chi phí sản xuất tiến trình Intel 18A đã giảm khoảng 40% kể từ quý 1.
• Trong quý 4 năm 2026, ban lãnh đạo dự báo doanh thu đạt 15 tỷ - 16 tỷ USD, biên lợi nhuận gộp phi GAAP đạt 38% và EPS phi GAAP đạt 0,25 USD ở mức trung vị.
• Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến nguồn cung CPU máy chủ vẫn bị hạn chế trong suốt năm 2027 và sang năm 2028. Intel cũng cho biết năm 2027 nhiều khả năng sẽ là một năm đầu tư mà không có dòng tiền tự do dương do chi tiêu vốn tăng mạnh.

Dữ liệu tài chính cốt lõi

Kết quả Kinh doanh và Hoạt động

Nhu cầu trung tâm dữ liệu vượt quá nguồn cung

DCAI là động lực tăng trưởng chính của Intel. Granite Rapids trở thành dòng sản phẩm máy chủ lớn nhất của công ty, trong khi Clearwater Forest, sản phẩm máy chủ Intel 18A đầu tiên của Intel, đã bắt đầu xuất hàng để ghi nhận doanh thu. Diamond Rapids đang được cung cấp dưới dạng mẫu thử và vẫn theo đúng kế hoạch tăng sản lượng trên tiến trình Intel 18A-P vào năm 2027.

Doanh thu chip chuyên dụng tăng hơn 50% so với quý trước và tăng hơn gấp đôi so với cùng kỳ năm ngoái. Ban lãnh đạo cho biết mảng kinh doanh này đã tăng gấp ba lần trong ba năm qua và có thể tiếp tục tăng gấp ba lần nữa trong vài năm tới.

Intel ước tính tổng thị trường có thể tiếp cận (TAM) của CPU máy chủ có thể mở rộng từ 40 tỷ USD lên hơn 200 tỷ USD trong vòng 5 năm, phần lớn do các khối lượng công việc tự chủ (agentic workloads) thúc đẩy. Đây là ước tính của ban lãnh đạo chứ không phải dự báo chính thức của công ty.

Nguồn cung vẫn là hạn chế chính. Intel đề cập đến thời gian chu kỳ của tiến trình Intel 3, tình trạng thiếu hụt đế hữu cơ nâng cao và việc tạm ngừng hoạt động kéo dài tại Fab 28 ở Israel. Công ty đang nỗ lực bổ sung sản lượng Intel 3 tại Oregon và dự kiến việc mở rộng công suất đế chip sẽ mang lại tác động rõ rệt hơn trong nửa sau năm 2027.

Sự điều chỉnh của thị trường PC gia tăng

Doanh thu CCPG giảm do tình trạng thiếu hụt bộ nhớ và giá tăng gây áp lực lên nhu cầu PC cũng như ngân sách của khách hàng. Các khách hàng OEM đã đẩy nhanh việc giảm hàng tồn kho vào cuối quý 3.

Doanh thu PC AI của Intel vẫn tăng 35% so với cùng kỳ năm ngoái. Sản lượng Wildcat Lake tăng khoảng 70% so với quý trước và sản phẩm đã bán hết sạch. Panther Lake tiếp tục tăng sản lượng trên tiến trình Intel 18A, trong khi Nova Lake vẫn vượt tiến độ. Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến Nova Lake sẽ đạt số lượng hợp tác thiết kế gấp đôi Panther Lake khi ra mắt.

Intel dự báo tổng thị trường có thể tiếp cận (TAM) tính theo đơn vị sản phẩm PC của ngành sẽ giảm khoảng 12% trong năm 2026, bao gồm mức sụt giảm hơn 20% trong nửa cuối năm. Đối với năm 2027, ban lãnh đạo đang lên kế hoạch cho mức giảm sản lượng khoảng 10%, với áp lực lớn hơn trong nửa đầu năm.

Chi phí và hiệu suất sản xuất (yield) của mảng Foundry được cải thiện

Intel cho biết hiệu suất sản xuất lại cải thiện trên tiến trình Intel 3 và Intel 18A, trong đó hiệu suất Intel 18A tăng trưởng ở mức hai chữ số trong quý 3. Chi phí tiến trình Intel 3 đã giảm khoảng 15% so với quý 1, trong khi chi phí Intel 18A giảm khoảng 40% trong cùng kỳ.

Tỷ trọng CPU máy tính cá nhân Intel 18A đã tăng từ dưới 5% doanh thu CPU máy tính cá nhân trong quý 1 lên gần một phần ba trong quý 3. Tiến trình Intel 18A-P vẫn đúng tiến độ ra mắt vào cuối năm và ban lãnh đạo cho biết sự quan tâm từ các khách hàng bên ngoài đang tăng lên.

Đối với tiến trình Intel 14A, công ty đã phát hành bộ công cụ thiết kế quy trình (PDK) 0.9 cho một số khách hàng chọn lọc vào tháng 10. Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến ra mắt PDK 1.0 vào quý 1/2027 và tiếp tục đặt mục tiêu sản xuất rủi ro (risk production) vào năm 2027 trước khi sản xuất hàng loạt vào năm 2028.

Dự báo của Ban Lãnh đạo

Triển vọng quý 4 bao gồm tác động ước tính 300 triệu USD đến doanh thu và tác động 200 điểm cơ bản đến biên lợi nhuận gộp từ sự cố Fab 28. Hầu như toàn bộ ảnh hưởng doanh thu đều liên quan đến các sản phẩm máy chủ 10 nanomet.

Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến doanh thu DCAI sẽ tăng trưởng ở mức khoảng 15% so với quý trước trong quý 4, với mảng chip chuyên dụng tăng trưởng nhanh hơn mức chung của toàn bộ phân khúc. Doanh thu CCPG dự kiến sẽ giảm hơn 20% so với quý trước khi khách hàng giảm tồn kho.

Intel duy trì dự báo chi tiêu vốn gộp năm 2026 là 20 tỷ USD và dự kiến chi tiêu năm 2027 sẽ tăng mạnh. Chi phí hoạt động phi GAAP cả năm 2026 dự kiến khoảng 16,3 tỷ USD.

Rủi ro và Các điểm cần theo dõi

• Hạn chế nguồn cung máy chủ: Nhu cầu tiếp tục vượt quá nguồn cung hiện có, với các giới hạn về wafer Intel 3 và đế đóng gói nâng cao dự kiến sẽ kéo dài sang nửa đầu năm 2027.
• Gián đoạn tại Fab 28: Ban lãnh đạo dự kiến tác động khoảng 300 triệu USD đến doanh thu trong cả quý 4/2026 và quý 1/2027, dựa trên đánh giá ban đầu.
• Áp lực từ thị trường PC và bộ nhớ: Intel không kỳ vọng tình hình thị trường bộ nhớ sẽ cải thiện trong năm 2027. Đợt điều chỉnh tồn kho PC có thể kéo dài từ quý 4 sang quý 1 và có khả năng ảnh hưởng đến một phần của quý 2.
• Áp lực lên biên lợi nhuận gộp: Doanh thu mảng khách hàng cá nhân thấp hơn, chi phí sản xuất cố định, việc chưa khai thác hết công suất ở tiến trình Intel 18A và đặc điểm biên lợi nhuận thấp hơn của chip chuyên dụng có thể gây áp lực lên biên lợi nhuận.
• Mức độ thâm dụng vốn: Ban lãnh đạo cho biết năm 2027 có thể sẽ không đạt dòng tiền tự do dương vì Intel sẽ đồng thời đẩy mạnh sản lượng Intel 18A, đầu tư vào Intel 18A-P và chuẩn bị đưa Intel 14A vào sản xuất.
• Khả năng sinh lời của mảng đúc chip (Foundry): Dù chi phí và hiệu suất sản xuất đang được cải thiện, Intel thừa nhận vẫn còn nhiều việc phải làm để xây dựng một mảng kinh doanh đúc chip có lợi nhuận bền vững.

Những điểm nổi bật trong phần Q&A với các chuyên gia phân tích

Tăng trưởng năm 2027: Giám đốc Tài chính (CFO) David Zinsner mô tả năm 2027 là một năm tăng trưởng, dẫn dắt bởi trung tâm dữ liệu và chip chuyên dụng. Tuy nhiên, tình trạng hạn chế nguồn cung dự kiến sẽ nghiêm trọng hơn trong nửa đầu năm, trước khi công suất sản xuất lớn hơn được mở ra vào cuối năm.

Dòng tiền tự do và chi tiêu vốn: Ban lãnh đạo chưa hoàn tất ngân sách chi tiêu vốn năm 2027, nhưng các đơn đặt hàng thiết bị đã tăng gần 40% so với quý trước. Zinsner cho biết khó có khả năng đạt dòng tiền tự do dương vào năm 2027 do mức đầu tư cao trên nhiều tiến trình công nghệ.

Thị phần máy chủ: Ban lãnh đạo cho biết thị phần máy chủ năm 2027 của Intel sẽ phụ thuộc lớn vào khả năng mở rộng nguồn cung. Công ty đang phân bổ lại một phần công suất từ sản xuất Panther Lake sang wafer máy chủ Intel 3 tại Oregon, mặc dù khả năng đáp ứng đế chip vẫn là một hạn chế khác.

Quỹ đạo biên lợi nhuận gộp: Granite Rapids bắt đầu gia tăng biên lợi nhuận gộp trong quý 3. Biên lợi nhuận của Panther Lake cải thiện đáng kể nhưng vẫn thấp hơn mức trung bình của công ty. Ban lãnh đạo kỳ vọng biên lợi nhuận gộp hàng năm sẽ mở rộng nếu Intel đạt mức tăng trưởng doanh thu, đồng thời lưu ý kết quả theo quý có thể thay đổi.

Khách hàng đúc chip bên ngoài: Intel kỳ vọng có thể đưa ra các thông báo về khách hàng tiềm năng cho dịch vụ đóng gói nâng cao trong vòng hai quý tới, tùy thuộc vào sự chấp thuận của khách hàng. Ban lãnh đạo cũng báo cáo về sự quan tâm từ bên ngoài đối với Intel 18A-P và việc trao đổi tích cực với một số khách hàng chọn lọc đối với Intel 14A.

Toàn văn cuộc họp báo cáo kết quả kinh doanh

Toàn văn cuộc gọi công bố kết quả kinh doanh

Phần trình bày của ban lãnh đạo

Operator

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Intel Corporation's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's program is being recorded.

And now I'd like to introduce your host for today's program, Mr. John Pitzer, Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

John Pitzer

Thank you, Jonathan, and good afternoon to everyone joining us today. By now, you should have received a copy of the Q3 earnings release and presentation. Both are available on our Investor Relations website, intc.com. For those joining us online today, the presentation is also available in our webcast window.

I'm joined today by our CEO, Lip-Bu Tan; and our CFO, Dave Zinsner. Lip-Bu will open on comments on third quarter results and progress on our strategic priorities. Dave will then discuss overall financial results, including fourth quarter guidance, before we transition to answer your questions.

Before we begin, please note that today's presentation does contain forward-looking statements based on the environment as we currently see it. As such, they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. It also contains references to non-GAAP financial measures that we believe provide useful information to our investors. Our earnings release, most recent annual report on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC provide more information on specific risk factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from our expectations. They also provide additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliation where appropriate to our corresponding GAAP financial measures.

With that, let me turn it over to Lip-Bu.

Lip-Bu Tan

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us. The demand environment in Q3 was more balanced than previous quarters. Strong momentum in DCAI drove upside and enabled the strongest revenue growth for the segment in 15 years. This was partially offset by weakness in CCPG driven by the industry-wide impacts from higher memory prices and limited IT budgets.

The industry continues to navigate one of the most significant supply shortages in history, driven by the unprecedented demand for super intelligence. Against this backdrop, I am pleased by the progress we make growing our server supply in Q3. I'm mindful about the ongoing challenges we face in the future quarters to keep pace with the server demand.

The successful completion of our equity offering in August provided us with the necessary financial resources to capture the growth ahead. I'm very pleased to add new sovereign funds and long-term growth investor, in addition to our existing shareholders. We are deploying this capital quickly and prudently. We expect CapEx and purchase commitments for key components to increase significantly over the next several quarters. I want to thank our substrate, memory, foundry, equipment suppliers for their strong partnership and collaborations as we work together to expand supply and support growing demand.

Turning to business units. First, DCAI within our server business, we are making steady progress on our road map. Granite Rapids on Intel 3 has become one of the fastest ramping server products. Clearwater Forest, our first Intel 18A server product, is shipping for revenue, and demand for 2027 is significant, especially in CPU-dense agentic rack-scale infrastructure.

Diamond Rapids, our first Intel 18A-P server product is sampling and on track to ramp in 2027, with strong interest for inference and agentic workloads. We were pleased to recently announce an agreement with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure to deploy our latest generation CPUs to support their AI buildout.

I also want to acknowledge headwinds limiting our progress to meet this extremely high AI-driven demand. First, Intel 3 yield and cycle time continue to improve, but I am demanding significant execution from the team. Second, even as our Intel 3 wafer output ramps quickly and industry-wide shortage of advanced organic substrates for our EMIB packaging is also impacting our ability to scale output.

Finally, early this month, an unfortunate and tragic accident led to an extended shutdown in our Israel factory. While the teams have worked quickly to address the situation, it will impact our Q4 10-nanometer server shipments.

Purpose-built silicon remains our fastest-growing business segment, tripling over the last 3 years, and posed to triple again over the next few years. We see further growth opportunity with both existing and new potential customers, including AI labs, and expanding our IP portfolio to meet the needs of a wider array of customers.

Lastly, we recently unveiled our Crescent Island inference optimized GPU. Early feedback is encouraging. Performance is tracking well. This is a new market for us, and it will take time to scale but customer engagements are progressing towards firm commitments.

Turning to our client business. In recent weeks, our customers began signaling a PC slowdown based on the memory prices and availability. Year-to-date system endpoint prices have increased significantly, placing additional pressure on already limited IT budgets. The pace of this PC correction has accelerated over the last 2 months, as our OEM partners are aggressively managing inventory to match the softer sell-through. We expect the current environment to persist until memory availability and prices begin to normalize.

While the next few quarters will be challenging for the PC market, our road map continues to strengthen and our long-term outlook remains positive. We have successfully ramped Panther Lake on Intel 18A, and demand for the Wildcat Lake is outstripping supply. Nova Lake, our first Intel 18A-P client product, is tracking ahead of schedule, with design wins expecting to be twice those of Panther Lake at launch. We look forward to sharing more at CES in January. As the market normalizes, we expect this portfolio drives meaningful share gain.

Intel Foundry execution continues to improve consistently. During the quarter, Intel 3 and Intel 18A yields both increased again, with Intel 18A improving at a double-digit rate. Wafer output on both nodes exceeded expectation. Intel 18A-P remains on track for launch by year-end across our internal product portfolio, and external customer engagement continues to build. We are engaged with a couple of highly strategic customers, and I'm increasingly confident that our Intel 18A-P will be an attractive node for external foundry customers.

Intel 14A also remains on track. In October, as committed, we released our industry standard 0.9 PDK to select customers. It is our highest-quality 0.9 PDK, meeting industry standard yield and performance criteria at release. As is standard practice in the foundry business, I have consistently maintained that we will not disclose customer details. That being said, I remain highly encouraged by the progress we are making with multiple potential customers on 14A.

On Advanced Packaging, we are pleased by the progress we are making with EMIB and EMIB-T for our internal products. Both continue to see significant external customer traction as well. We continue to improve on execution, working with our supply chain to secure the capacity to meet the needs of our Advanced Packaging customers. We are also seeing robust progress in the readiness of HBI, which is an enabler of 3D chip stacking for our upcoming server products.

Across our manufacturing network, additional capacity continues to come online. Intel 3 tool installation is progressing well in Ireland, as is in the ramp of the 18A in both Oregon and Arizona, including Fab 62, our second high-volume 18A fab. In New Mexico and Malaysia, we are adding capacity to support strong customer ramps for advanced packaging next year.

In New Albany, Ohio, the team recently achieved important construction milestone with installation of the first major structural truss, and we continue to evaluate unique and highly differentiated opportunity to accelerate our Ohio buildout. And I hope to share more on this in the near future.

Looking to the future, I have always emphasized that rebuilding Intel is going to be a multiyear journey, and I remain firmly committed to making it happen. We are only 1 year into this journey. We have made enormous strides in these 18 months, including dramatic resizing of our workforce, eliminating middle management and bureaucracy, streamlining our executive ranks and establishing an almost entirely new leadership team. We have installed once again an engineering-centric culture, streamlining our product portfolio and put in place a more competitive road map for Intel products and Intel Foundry. We still have much more to do.

The resurgence in demand for CPU is meaningful tailwind for us along our transformation journey. Increasingly, energy efficiency is becoming the most important metric for the AI infrastructure buildout. While GPUs are great at thinking tasks, deterministic CPU are far more efficient at finding tasks. While GPU reasoning query run as high as multiple watt-hours of energy, a single CPU query could cause only [ joules ] of energy.

Applying even conservative estimates to the total number of digital agents and agent serve per CPU, it is easy to anticipate a massive dollar and unit TAM for CPUs over the coming 5 years. By our estimates, server CPU TAM, largely driven by agentic workloads, could increase as much as 5x from where it is today, from $40 billion to more than $200 billion over 5 years. This makes the opportunity for Intel enormous.

We're, of course, mindful of fierce competition underway as nearly every fabless company race to meet this unprecedented demand with their own offering. But Intel is uniquely positioned to benefit from this demand in 3 ways. First, as a custodian of x86, the most widely deployed ISA in the world, we are doubling down on x86 innovation, have an exciting Tick-Tock road map of CPO innovations in the pipeline. In addition, for the first time, we are making fully modular verified instances of our x86 CPUs, optimized for the custom workloads available to our customers.

Second, as 1 of the just 3 advanced node semiconductor foundries in the world and the only one domiciled in the United States, we are well positioned to support not only our own demand, but also the demand of wider fabless industry. We are also open to building any CPU at scale for our customers fully agnostic to underlying ISA.

Third, as modern computing platforms increasingly become complex system in the package, our leadership in advanced packaging offers highly differentiated solution, especially to meet the requirements of the massive AI infrastructure buildout underway. This is why I remain optimistic on the opportunities ahead for Intel even as we have work to do.

Lastly, while we remain focused on executing against our near-term priorities, we cannot lose sight of what's to come next. Intel has a deep portfolio of technology and IP that positions us to drive the next wave of computing. We are continuing to invest in breakthrough technologies, including silicon photonics, neuromorphic computing, advanced materials and quantum computing that we believe can unlock the importance of new opportunities over time.

This week, we announced our intent to acquire Classiq, an Israel-based quantum software provider, moving our quantum efforts from foundational research towards commercialization. Classiq's over-arching hardware-agnostic software platform layer provides a gateway for more consumers to explore quantum computing, and it is a wonderful complement to our already strong internal quantum hardware and software stacks, and enable us to further extend our compute platform offerings, to include QPUs in addition to CPUs, GPUs and ASICs. Post acquisition, Intel will become a full-stack revenue-generating quantum computing company.

In summary, while we did well in Q3, there's clearly more work to do. I'm disappointed that we were not able to meet strong customer demand in this quarter. We face near-term challenges, including manufacturing, supply shortage, the unprecedented memory crunch and the resulting softness in PC demand. But I remain confident in our path forward. We need to address these challenges with urgency, without losing sight of the massive opportunity in front of us.

I want to thank our employees, partners and suppliers for their tireless effort in this quarter. With that, I will turn the call over to Dave for additional details.

David Zinsner

Thank you, Lip-Bu. We delivered a strong quarter, exceeding our guidance for revenue, gross margin and earnings per share. This marks the eighth consecutive quarter of exceeding our financial expectations. Our Q3 results reinforce the essential role our server CPUs play in the build-out of Super Intelligence or AI infrastructure. Results also demonstrate our improving execution as we grow supply to capture the strong demand for AI compute.

Third quarter revenue was $16.5 billion, led by record year-over-year growth in DCAI. Strong execution across our factory network and external supply chain drove better-than-expected server CPU output. This strength was partially offset by weakness in client where industry-wide PC consumption is being impacted by memory shortages and limited IT budgets.

Third quarter non-GAAP gross margin was 44.1%, approximately 200 basis points higher than Q2 in our guidance. The sequential improvement was driven by improved costs on Intel 3 and Intel 18A and a more favorable product mix.

Third quarter non-GAAP EPS was $0.52, compared with our guidance of $0.38. The upside was driven by higher revenue, stronger gross margin and disciplined spending, which together produced better-than-expected operating leverage.

Operating cash flow was $5.1 billion. We ended the quarter with approximately $54 billion in cash and short-term investments, in addition to $15 billion of borrowing capacity under our new extended revolvers, up from $10 billion previously.

In early August, we further strengthened our balance sheet through a $23 billion equity offering. The incremental interest income associated with the offering contributed approximately $0.01 to Q3 EPS that was not contemplated in our original guidance.

Now moving to segment results. DCAI revenue was $7.3 billion, up 17% sequentially and nearly 80% year-over-year. Revenue was meaningfully ahead of our expectations as our factory network and external suppliers supported higher output. The work our teams have done to increase supply is having a tangible impact. Based on our current outlook, DCAI revenue is on track to finish 2026 nearly $10 billion above expectations entering the year.

Q3 growth was broad-based across hyperscale, enterprise and neocloud customers. We also continued to see strong momentum in purpose-built silicon with revenue increasing more than 50% sequentially and more than doubling year-over-year. Despite our progress to increase capacity, demand for DCAI products continues to meaningfully exceed available supply.

DCAI operating profit was $3 billion, representing 42% of revenue and increasing approximately $600 million sequentially. The improvement was driven by higher revenue and lower operating expenses. Granite Rapids is now the largest product family in our server portfolio as we continue to increase output from our Ireland facility.

Earlier this month, at the Open Compute Project, Global Summit, we demonstrated select Clearwater Forest configurations that scale beyond 46,000 cores per rack at approximately 133 kilowatts of total rack power, delivering best-in-class performance per watt. We also introduced the Intel GPU D Series, formerly code-named Crescent Island, which is designed to improve the economics of sustained memory-intensive AI inference. Customer interest in both product families is running ahead of our initial expectations.

CCPG revenue was $8.1 billion, down 9% sequentially and below our expectations. We previously noted that memory shortages could pressure the second half PC TAM. That pressure intensified during Q3, particularly late in the quarter, and resulted in a meaningful adjustment in customer purchasing patterns. Despite the near-term weakness, we saw several positive developments. Our AI PC revenue grew 35% year-over-year, even as total CCPG revenue declined 5%. Our client products on Intel 18A continued to ramp well. Wildcat Lake, our cost-optimized Intel 18A client CPU increased units by approximately 70% sequentially and is sold out. Lastly, our edge business was more resilient, supported by continued momentum in edge and physical AI design wins.

CCPG operating profit was $2.3 billion, representing 28% of revenue and approximately flat sequentially, primarily due to lower inventory charges.

Turning to Intel Foundry. Intel Foundry revenue was $6.7 billion, up 16% sequentially, driven by better-than-expected growth on Intel 3 and Intel 18A. External foundry revenue was $411 million, an increase of $118 million sequentially, primarily due to a nonrecurring customer program.

Intel Foundry reported an operating loss of $1.9 billion, an improvement of $236 million sequentially, even as we continued to invest aggressively to prepare Intel 14A for risk production next year. Higher yields, better cycle times and increased factory utilization continue to reduce wafer costs. Intel 3 costs improved approximately 15% from Q1 levels, while volumes increased in the mid-teens sequentially. Intel 18A costs have declined approximately 40% since Q1, reflecting continued yield and cycle time improvements.

Intel 18A yields continued their upward trajectory to industry standard levels, ahead of our internal projections. Since Q1, Intel 18A client CPUs have grown from less than 5% of revenue to now nearly 1/3 of client CPU revenue. These results represent meaningful progress, although we still have considerable work ahead of us to deliver a sustainably profitable foundry business.

Now turning to outlook. Demand signals from our data center customers continue to strengthen. We expect the industry to remain supply-constrained throughout 2027 and into 2028. As Lip-Bu discussed, the adoption of agentic AI is broadening the role of CPU compute. AI workloads are moving beyond crop-based responses toward multistep reasoning, orchestration and autonomous persistent action. Our CPUs play a central role in enabling these workloads.

As a result, we continue to see strong demand for our DCAI products. We now expect industry server CPU units to grow more than 30% in both 2026 and 2027. Growth would be higher in both years if additional industry supply were available. At the same time, the PC market is weakening after remaining resilient during the first half of 2026. We expect the 2026 PC unit TAM to decline approximately 12%, with second half units down more than 20%. We do not expect a sustained recovery until memory availability improves and pricing begins to normalize. For 2027, we're planning for the PC unit TAM to decline roughly 10%. We expect year-over-year declines to be more pronounced during the first half, with the potential for improvement in the second half against an easier comparison.

Our longer-term view of the PC market remains unchanged. Traditional PCs will play an important role in enabling AI applications and driving strong returns on AI infrastructure spending. In addition, we're just now seeing new agentic systems in the market. We also continue to see attractive longer-term opportunities in edge and physical AI as a genetic applications spread across the economy.

Taking these factors together, we're guiding Q4 revenue to a range of $15 billion to $16 billion. At the midpoint of $15.5 billion, we expect a gross margin of 38%, a tax rate of 11% and EPS of $0.25, all on a non-GAAP basis. Our guidance includes an impact of roughly $300 million to revenue and 200 basis points to gross margin based on our early assessment of the incident at Fab 28.

By segment, we expect DCAI revenue to grow mid-teens percent sequentially, with purpose-built silicon growing faster than DCAI overall. Please note almost all of the $300 million impact from Fab 28 is related to 10-nanometer server products.

We expect CCPG revenue to decline greater than 20% sequentially as customers move quickly to reduce weeks of inventory and align purchases with their expectations for 2027 consumption. The sequential decline in Q4 gross margin primarily reflects lower overall revenue against our fixed cost base as we adjust client wafer starts to current demand conditions. In addition, revenue mix, especially the strong growth expected in purpose-built silicon, is creating difficult quarter-on-quarter comparison. These headwinds will be partially offset by continued yield and cost improvements on Intel 3 and 18A.

We expect non-GAAP operating expenses of approximately $4.4 billion in Q4 and approximately $16.3 billion for the full year. We expect noncontrolling interest, or NCI, to be approximately $250 million in Q4, and we currently expect NCI of approximately $1.1 billion in both 2027 and 2028. Lastly, we expect Q4 fully a diluted share count of 5.44 billion, representing a full quarter of shares issued for our August equity offering.

Moving to CapEx, our 2026 gross capital expenditures remains on track to be $20 billion, and we expect 2027 gross capital spending to be up strongly. We have made good progress securing the equipment required to support our growth plans, with firm purchase orders to equipment suppliers increasing nearly 40% sequentially. We're also accelerating [ clean room ] build-outs, including Fab 62 in Arizona, and exploring opportunities to accelerate in Ohio. Despite this increase in capital spending and working capital, we remain committed to deleveraging in 2027.

We will remain disciplined as we invest, and we will not spend $1 of capital unless we have confidence in the health of our products and process technologies and clear evidence of customer demand. Our confidence in all 3 is improving.

In closing, I want to offer a few words outlining the opportunity we see ahead. Our core server CPU market is growing faster than ever, and edge and physical AI represent meaningful incremental opportunities for client-class CPUs even as we navigate the current market conditions.

Importantly, as we improve our product execution and road map, we have opportunities to regain share and grow even faster than our underlying markets. Beyond our core x86 franchise, we are investing in 3 large opportunities where we have meaningful momentum but relatively modest revenue today: purpose-built silicon, advanced packaging and external wafer foundry. Each represents tens of billions of dollars of new markets where our technology, manufacturing assets and customer relationships provide us a differentiated opportunity to participate.

Taken together, we have line of sight to long-term double-digit revenue growth with meaningful leverage and improving margins. We have significant work ahead of us. However, the combination of stronger markets and the cultural changes set into motion by Lip-Bu to improve execution, transparency and discipline gives us increasing confidence in Intel's long-term earnings power and free cash flow growth, a solid foundation for building sustainable shareholder value.

With that, I'll turn it over to John to begin the Q&A.

John Pitzer

Thank you, Dave. [Operator Instructions] With that, Jonathan, can we take the first question?

Operator

Certainly. And our first question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.

Phần hỏi đáp

Timothy Arcuri

Dave, I'm wondering with all the puts and takes and what's going on in PC. I'm wondering if you can give us maybe some guardrails maybe you could say it next year? I mean it seems like DCAI could grow $10 billion to $15 billion year-over-year, but PC, I'm guessing, is maybe down a touch. So can you just maybe give us guardrails for the year and sort of how to think about the shape of the year?

David Zinsner

Yes, Tim. Yes, I'm not obviously going to guide next year, but maybe I'll give you some qualitative information. I would say at a high level, we see next year as a growth year. We feel like the momentum that we saw in data center this quarter, and taking away the impact from Israel, that momentum would have continued into the fourth quarter, we see that continuing next year.

The only little nuance is the first half of the year, we are still a bit constrained. We've talked about putting 40% more capacity in substrates, but a lot of that doesn't hit until the back half of the year. In addition, we are still constrained on Intel 3, and we're going to work towards moving, as Lip-Bu said, some of our supply into Oregon, but it's going to take a while before that comes out of the fab and gets into products. But we're very optimistic and enthusiastic about the opportunities for us next year in terms of growth on the data center business.

In addition, we talked about within DCAI, we also have purpose-built silicon. That business has been growing at a 3x rate over the last 3 years. We see that growing at a 3x rate in the next 3 years. And so we're really bullish about that throughout 2027.

Obviously, the client is going to be the most difficult to call. As I talked about, we see TAM declining in '26 by about 12% on a unit basis. We think that's going to be about 10% next year on a unit basis. So that will be one dynamic. Then there's going to be this kind of inventory correction. We're in the throes of that right now. We felt a little bit of it in the third quarter; we're going to feel a lot of it in the fourth quarter. We think it extends at least out into the first quarter. After that, I think you'll start to see like the inventory correction part of this start to kind of wane and we'll be back into more of like what's going to go on, on the TAM side, which, as I said, we're thinking about 10% down.

The one added piece of this is we come into next year with Nova Lake as our product offering. And we think this is the best set of products we've had in a very long time. We think it covers the gamut of what's required to participate in client. We're very excited about it. We think next year and in the future years, we're in a kind of a market share gain type of environment for our clients. So obviously, unfortunate that we run into this challenge on the memory side and its impact on client, but we are very enthusiastic about the product side.

And I just -- you didn't ask this question, but I'll just extend it out beyond this year. We do think that the PC is going to go through a renaissance despite this. And we think that as AI workloads start to shift around, there's going to be a lot of workload required in the client space, either as a PC or a some kind of agentic box. And so we do see this market as being pretty interesting. It's got to obviously get through this bit of challenge that we have. But longer term, feel really good about the market.

John Pitzer

Tim, do you have a quick follow-up question?

Timothy Arcuri

I do. Yes. So Dave, you did say that CapEx is going to be up a lot next year. I think a lot of us are thinking kind of like $30 billion. But I guess the real question is, are you committed to generating free cash flow next year? Or do you think because of the CapEx burden, that that will be hard?

David Zinsner

Yes, it's a good question. Yes, we haven't exactly locked into the number. We don't do that until we get to towards the end of this year. But we have kind of a directional understanding of what's likely to happen. And we have been putting POs in place with equipment vendors given the lead time. So we have some sense of what's going to happen.

I think next year is an investment year for us as we look at the year. Probably not a dynamic where we're going to have positive free cash flow next year. But it's because we see this as a tremendous opportunity to invest into the growth. And one thing that we have seen is you make the right investments, you ramp the node in the right way, you see profitability and you see return on invested capital. And we talked about this as we were doing the equity offering at the beginning of August, that we think we should be getting at least 20% ROI on all of these nodes as we invest in them.

But this -- next year is going to be one of those years where there's a couple of things going on at the same time. We're ramping 18A, we're ramping 18A to some extent, and we're making the appropriate investments to position 14A to begin production in '28. That's a lot of investment all kind of hitting us in 1 year. So I don't think that this will be a year in which we see positive cash flow.

And by the way, that is why we raised the money that we did at the beginning of August, was to get ourselves positioned to do this. Longer term though, these businesses generate lots of cash flow. And if you look at Intel 7 today, kind of 10-nanometer 7, that's already a profitable node to us. Intel 3 is going to be profitable next year for us. So we know we can make these businesses profitable. We know we can generate good cash flow from them. We know we can get 20% return. We just got to get through what is basically a [ nut hole ] here in '27 to go realize that.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ben Reitzes from Melius.

Benjamin Reitzes

I wanted to ask about some of the issues that you noted for 4Q and that may linger into 1Q and see if you can kind of size them versus prior expectations and then when they get better. You cited execution, obviously, the Israel situation, which is $300 million. Wondering what that's going to be in the quarters after that and when that is solved. And sorry that happened, by the way. And then the client. And in the context that the guide is about [ 1.8 ] below the Street, maybe you can kind of go through those 3 things, how big they are to the cut of [ 1.8 ] and when they get better, that would be great.

David Zinsner

Yes. What was the -- so Israel, the client, what was the third one?

John Pitzer

Just relative to the guide in the Street.

Benjamin Reitzes

The execution, Dave. There was an extra comment around execution, and Lip-Bu and made some comments. I'm wondering how big that was in terms of the guidance cut.

David Zinsner

Okay. Well, on Israel, we've been shut down for about 2 weeks. We feel like we're going to be starting up production here by the end of this week. While we're doing that, we're trying to assess all the wafers that are in the line and what's usable and what's not usable from those materials. So this is somewhat of an early assessment, both really of 4Q and 1Q. But I think the current thinking is that we'll have about a $300 million impact to the fourth quarter. That's likely to be similar in the first quarter.

We think most of the write-offs of wafers or scrapping of wafers is likely to all kind of happen in the fourth quarter. That's kind of what's driving the 200 basis point. But I wouldn't expect to see additional scrapping going on in the first quarter. But just keep in mind, it's early, we're going through all of that as we speak, and we'll, of course, update you as we go along.

I think on the client side, obviously, it's going to kind of reset to this level, and we're going to have -- I think, usually, you have a very similar inventory correction quarter-to-quarter. So I would expect it to generally be similar other than there will be more -- you will have a seasonality effect in Q1 on client as well. So the likelihood is that whatever the level that we're talking about for the fourth quarter, we'll see somewhat of a seasonal decline next quarter.

Beyond that, I think from an execution perspective, I have to think about some of the negative things, but a lot of the execution has been really positive. I mean Lip-Bu has -- and the team have done a very good job driving Intel 3 yields, driving 18A yields and working with the substrate vendors. Lip-Bu was in Japan talking to many of the substrate vendors, to make sure that we were getting allocated the appropriate supply. So I think we're as positioned -- or as well positioned as anyone out there in terms of delivering supply. It's tight. It's going to be tight this next quarter. It's going to be tied into the first half. But I think we've positioned ourselves well that, beyond that, we should start to see some pretty healthy growth in the data center business.

John Pitzer

Ben, do you have a quick follow-up?

Benjamin Reitzes

Yes. Then just with regard to the server velocity, there's shortages and whatnot. But do you have an idea for when you think you can ramp and grow in line with the market that's going on that $200 billion plus? Is that more second half next year based on your commentary?

Lip-Bu Tan

Yes. Good question. I think, Ben, first of all, I think the server, the biggest revenue for us is the Granite Rapids, that's on the Intel 3. Clearly, we are continuing to drive efficiency in terms of yield. And then secondly, we also try to expand the capacity. And I think that Dave mentioned about Oregon, we are planning to have that Intel 3 in the second half of next year to be in the production so that we can supply some of the demand from the customer.

And so I think overall, I think we'll be good to address the Intel 3. And then clearly, we have the Clearwater Forest coming up, and we are in the shipping [indiscernible] on 18A, we should have capacity for that. And then Diamond Rapids, that will be 2027, we have 18A-P, we'll be ready for that. And of course, the Coral Rapids coming up in 2028, that will be on the 14A. So those, I think, we'll be in pretty good shape.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Moore from Morgan Stanley.

Joseph Moore

Yes. I mean along the same lines, does the PC weakness give the opportunity to reallocate wafers and sort of address some of this and accelerate that transition?

David Zinsner

The answer, yes. We had -- what we're taking off-line to put Intel 3 into Oregon is 18A wafers, which we're generally going to build Panther Lake products. So we see the opportunity with some of that capacity freed up to go produce more data center wafers.

Just keep in mind that we're not only constrained on the wafer side, we're also constrained on the substrate side. So it's important we get the substrate piece of this ramped up to be able to meet the demand.

John Pitzer

Joe, do you have a follow-up question?

Joseph Moore

Yes, I do. How do you see server market share next year? I think you talked about 30% unit growth. AMD has guided to 70% revenue growth. The ARM camp seems to be growing quite quickly. Just I understand you're constrained, but how do you sort of see market share playing out?

Lip-Bu Tan

Sure. I think that's a good question. So clearly, we have a road map. We like what we have, in terms of Coral Rapids, we will be competitive to AMD. And the next-generation product, the Tick-Tock, we'll be ahead of the AMD on that. So I think stay tuned, we'll continue to drive leadership. CPU is really our franchise. We are determined to drive success there. And then I think that's a good opportunity for us to really drive that.

David Zinsner

I'd say maybe one other addition is I really see market share next year being a function of supply. And so the more we can improve our supply on a relative basis, the better we'll do in terms of market share.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research.

Stacy Rasgon

I wanted to dig into gross margins a little bit. So I get that the 38% guidance, I guess, would have been 40% without the unfortunate situation in Israel. But as I'm looking into next year, how do I think about the overall drivers? I've got a -- clearly, I have a client flush and maybe utilization issue, which is a negative. I've got depreciation probably going up from CapEx, which is a negative.

And then maybe like as 18A and 3 ramp, I guess the yields are getting better, but I guess you can tell us if the gross margins on those parts are still below 10.7%. I wonder if that mix shift is a headwind plus ASICs and packaging and everything.

And maybe on the other side though, maybe mix towards servers as a positive, maybe pricing helps. I'm just trying to get a feeling of the gross margin evolution in this kind of an environment given all of those puts and takes? It just seems like there's a lot of them. I'm hoping you could...

David Zinsner

That's a good question, Stacy. There are definitely a lot of moving pieces. I think from a margin perspective, the Israel piece, it's, probably on a margin basis, is going to be really more of a Q4 event. I don't expect a significant amount in Q1 in terms of scrapping. Usually, if we can identify it, we'll scrap it in the quarter. We have Xeon demand remains really strong. And I think I mentioned Granite Rapids is now margin accretive for us. So growth in Granite Rapids is helpful to gross margins. And we will also continue to be focused on both Intel 3 and 18A.

Their structural cost is what we can focus on more, as well as yields, throughput, all of those. We did very well in Q3, we expect to do better in Q4. And the goal is to continue to drive that through the year.

You're right on 18A, the loading isn't going to be where we want it. We're fixing a little bit of that with putting Intel 3 in Oregon. But nevertheless, there will be a little bit of a under-loading scenario for 18A that's going to be a little bit of a headwind.

The other headwind for us, which is, I think, a positive viewed the right way, is our purpose-built silicon business, and it's kind of in its early stages, its margins are below the corporate average. But we see tremendous growth there. And Lip-Bu and I really decided to focus on driving the gross profit. And so we're just going to grow the gross profit. That will grow the earnings. It may put a little pressure on the operating margin percentage through next year, but I think it will be goodness at the bottom line.

I think when you put all that together, and it's so many puts and takes, it's hard to quantify, I still lean towards the [ 40 to 60 ] fall-through. That's probably what we're shooting for. So if we have a growth here next year, we should see gross margin expansion given that kind of rule of thumb. It may not work out every quarter that way. But I think when you look at it on a year-over-year basis, it's going to be in that kind of range.

John Pitzer

Stacy, do you have a follow-up question?

Stacy Rasgon

I do, yes. I guess I wanted to ask about PC. So I mean, Q3 was probably the worst Q3 I've seen for PCs in at least 20 years, maybe more, sequentially. So it does sound like customers probably built inventory in Q2. I guess, can you confirm that? And then it sounds like that they're flushing out a bunch in Q4. I'm trying to get -- and maybe even in Q1. It sounds like you think things get better in the second half as, I suppose, memory supply. What gives you confidence that memory supply is actually going to improve? If you listen to [ the AMD ] guys, they seem to be suggesting that it won't.

David Zinsner

Yes, let me -- yes, it's a good question. Stacy, let me be clear. We think that when you're dead-on that Q4, Q1 are going to be likely the 2 quarters in which there's most of the inventory correction, and that impacts us more than the TAM declines. So we will see that in the first, call it, Q4, Q1, maybe stretching a little bit into Q2.

After that, it does recover back to where, theoretically, where billings to us are somewhat equivalent to consumption. So we get a little bit of a recovery from that. But make no mistake, we are not optimistic about next year in terms of memory. We think that it is going to impact the TAM. We think TAM will be down 10% on a unit basis next year. And then we'll have to see in '28 whether things improve. But our expectation is that it does not improve in '27.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities.

Vivek Arya

For the first one, if I take your, I think, implied DC guidance for, that puts it at about $8.5 billion or so. And if I annualize that, that's like mid-30s billion in terms of a conceptual target for next year. So I'm curious, is that a doable floor? Can you do better? Is there kind of ASP expansion, just given demand is outstripping supply? Or are there other factors we should keep in mind as we think about how large your data center business could be in '27?

David Zinsner

Yes. I think that's a good starting point. I think that's the right way to think about it. What we would characterize is that the first half of 27 is likely to be tighter in terms of wafers and substrates. But we've put a lot of work in place, both in terms of as I talked about increasing our wafer output of Intel 3, improving yields as a free way to get more product, and the investments we've made in the substrates with vendors unlock that capacity in the back half of the year. So we do expect it to be big growth.

I mean keep in mind also that we roll our purpose-built silicon, our ASIC business in under that business unit. So that's part of what's driving a lot of the growth in the fourth quarter. And again, we expect that to continue in '27.

John Pitzer

Vivek, do you have a follow-up?

Vivek Arya

Yes. I was hoping to get an update on engagements with external customers in your foundry both on the packaging side? And then also more importantly, Lip-Bu, on the kind of the wafer processing side. Are you expecting external customers for 18A-P? Or should we assume that all the engagements will be on 14A? And when do you think Intel gets the confidence to move them from sort of the evaluation to the tape-out or tangible revenue column, so we're all kind of set in terms of when we should start modeling external revenue for Intel over the next few years?

Lip-Bu Tan

Good. Vivek, thank you so much for the question. So I think clearly the first question you have is about the packaging. Our EMIB-T making great progress. We have been very focused on capacity in the substrate, making sure that we can secure the capacity we need and also the yield profile for the capacity from substrate material.

Secondly, we focus on the yield, and we are improving substantially. And then thirdly, it's the cycle time. And then so far, under the leadership of Seok-Hee Lee, he used to be the CEO of SK Hynix, expert in the process integration. He's done fabulous job, very dedicated. I think we get a lot of capacity in the next 2 years in terms of the substrate material. And we're also improving the yield as the they go by.

And then overall, I think we're going to have some -- stay tuned, we're going to have a couple of customers already to announce in the next 2 quarters. And then, so clearly, we always want to wait for the customer. If they want to announce, we will respond to that.

And then secondly, on the 18A-P, we're making great progress in volume production from Panther Lake, and then clearly on the Wildcat Lake. And so I think those, I think, internally, we've been using. The yield, we are quite happy with the performance. And right now, we also have inbound interest from the external customer, and we are intensively working with them, and they are very pleased with the yield. And right now, we are focused on the die size, make sure that we can deliver to them and also make sure that IP ready for that. So I think 18A-P, stay tuned. We have some good progress on that.

On the 14A, we made tremendous progress. I think we announced the 0.9 PDK. We already released to our select customers. They already respond very actively working with us. And then the other part is also, I think, in terms of performance, yield, all the metrics and [ defect ] density and the variation, we are making daily improvement on that. So far, we are very pleased. We should be able to do the 1 PDK by Q1 next year, and we can start engaging with customers with products they like to use our fab. And so I think stay tuned again, we will have time to announce some of the customers when they are ready.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan.

Harlan Sur

Commencing second half of this year, there's a number of new GPU and XTU platform launches. Most of these new launches are going to continue to ramp through the first half of next year. Given the strong CPU attached to these platforms and many of them are Intel x86 DPU-based platforms. And then additionally, in addition to the overall sort of supply dynamics, which remain tight, but the team is bringing on more capacity, yields are improving, as you mentioned. Given all of this, should we anticipate continued sequential growth in DCAI in the first quarter?

David Zinsner

Yes. I mean I would avoid guiding too much the quarter. I think your overall premise is right. There's going to be a strong driver of demand for CPUs. We see that continuing all through next year. We're working on the supply side of the equation to make sure that we can meet what customers need. We will likely not fully meet what they require. But I think we're going to be in a more challenging situation in the first half of the year than we are in the second half. So maybe that's one added data point I'd just make sure that you're using when you're modeling. Outside of that, I'd prefer to wait for another quarter and see how things kind of play out before we guide Q1's data center.

Lip-Bu Tan

Harlan, just to add on that. I think clearly you saw our announcement with Oracle Cloud. And we also have multiple customers, they are all interested to sign up the LTA agreement with us. So that make sure that we can secure the CPU rollout for them. So I think those are encouraging signs that CPU is high demand.

John Pitzer

Harlan, do you have a follow-up question?

Harlan Sur

Yes. On the factors that the team has control over and as a reflection of the continued yield, reliability, manufacturability improvements, I think back in Q2, both Panther Lake and Granite Rapids gross margins were below corporate average. But as Intel 3 and 18A saw further yield improvements in the third quarter, you did mention [indiscernible] Granite Rapids on Intel 3 accretive to gross margins in Q3. Did the team also drive core Series 3 Panther Lake gross margins above the low mid-40% level in Q3 as well?

David Zinsner

So we have definitely made meaningful improvement on the gross margins of Panther Lake. It's not yet at or above the corporate average, but we have made huge strides. And this is just a matter of grinding it out on yields and throughput and driving the right scale and so forth. And these will be accretive gross margins over time. It's just not quite there yet.

John Pitzer

Jonathan, we've got time for one last question, please.

Operator

Certainly. Then our final question for today comes from the line of C.J. Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.

Christopher Muse

I guess first question, going back to CapEx, you talked up significantly. Curious how you're thinking about spending on WFE versus buildings. I think in the past, you've talked about majority of the incremental spend on buildings. I wanted to confirm that that's still kind of the direction that we're going.

David Zinsner

Yes. So we have, I think, a significant ramp in equipment spend this quarter, and it's expected to be even more significant next quarter. So a lot of what we're spending on now is really equipment. We have made the investments. I would call it, putting -- in a lot of cases, putting the finishing touches on some of the space and just most of the spend is going towards equipment, with the only exception we're still in the heavy construction phase of Ohio. But outside of that, it's really about equipment.

John Pitzer

C.J., do you have a quick follow-up?

Christopher Muse

Yes. On the PC side, I know you've talked about units down 10% next year for the industry. Curious if you could comment on how you're thinking about your mix shift and what impact that might have on your pricing?

David Zinsner

Mix shift in terms of like low end versus high end and so forth? Is that what you mean?

Christopher Muse

Yes, exactly.

David Zinsner

Yes. I mean we have -- I would say we have seen we have seen strong demand in Panther Lake on a relative basis. Obviously, the whole market is coming off, but Panther Lake is holding its own. We also put a lot of effort into a product called Wildcat Lake, which is a cost-optimized part. We've seen significant growth in Wildcat Lake. It's coming exactly at the right time because it's cost-optimized and we're seeing a lot of focus in that regard.

As we go into next year, we'll have Nova Lake. And I think the important aspect of Nova Lake is we've had a bit of a hole in our portfolio for high-end desktop, and Nova Lake filled in that gap. So I would expect us to do pretty well on a mix basis because we should see better traction on the high-end desktop as well. So we'll see how it goes. We do feel like we go into the year as a market share gainer with our Nova Lake portfolio. And obviously, we'll kind of monitor the market and see how things kind of play out.

Lip-Bu Tan

With that, I want to thank everyone for joining us today. We made good progress this quarter on our journey to transform Intel, but we still have a lot to work ahead of us. I'm looking forward to seeing many of you throughout the quarter and providing another update in January.

Operator

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.