AirSculpt Technologies (AIRS) Fiscal Q3 2026 Earnings Call: Revenue Falls 8.7%, Guidance Lowered
AirSculpt reported fiscal Q3 2026 revenue of $31.9 million, down 8.7% year over year, driven by a 9.6% decline in case volume and marketing headwinds from Google AI Overviews. Adjusted EBITDA dropped to $400,000. To mitigate traffic pressures, the company is diversifying marketing channels, expanding GLP-1 and alloClae procedures, and addressing center-level execution issues. Management lowered full-year 2026 revenue guidance to $144 million–$146 million and adjusted EBITDA to $9 million–$10 million. Additionally, AirSculpt completed a $44 million refinancing, extending its debt maturity to 2031 to enhance liquidity and financial flexibility.
Key Takeaways
- Fiscal Q3 2026 revenue fell 8.7% year over year to $31.9 million. Same-center revenue excluding London declined approximately 7.5%.
- Case volume decreased 9.6%, partly offset by a 2.3% increase in average selling price to approximately $12,900.
- Adjusted EBITDA declined to approximately $400,000, or 1.2% of revenue, from $3 million, or 8.7%, a year earlier.
- Google AI Overviews contributed to 16% fewer leads and a 26% increase in cost per lead. Customer acquisition cost rose to roughly $3,800 per case from $3,100.
- AirSculpt completed 250 GLP-1-related procedures, representing nearly 10% of total cases. Management continues to view this category as a potential revenue opportunity of more than $100 million across the existing center base.
- Management lowered full-year 2026 guidance to revenue of $144 million-$146 million and adjusted EBITDA of $9 million-$10 million.
Key Financial Data
| Metric | Fiscal Q3 2026 | Year-over-year comparison | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31.9 million | Down 8.7% | Lower lead generation and weaker performance at several centers |
| Same-center revenue, excluding London | — | Down approximately 7.5% | Case volume weakness partly offset by pricing |
| Case volume | — | Down 9.6% | Reflects lower marketing productivity and center-level execution issues |
| Average selling price | Approximately $12,900 | Up 2.3% | Remained within the company’s historical range |
| Gross margin | Approximately 60.0% | Up from 57.5% | Operating efficiencies, cost discipline and the London center closure |
| SG&A | Approximately $20.3 million | Up about $700,000 | Higher marketing spending and professional expenses |
| Customer acquisition cost | Approximately $3,800 per case | Up from approximately $3,100 | Lower website traffic and leads linked to AI Overviews |
| Adjusted EBITDA | Approximately $400,000 | Down from $3 million | Lower revenue and operating leverage, partly offset by cost controls |
| Adjusted EBITDA margin | Approximately 1.2% | Down from 8.7% | Revenue pressure reduced operating leverage |
| Quarter-end cash | Approximately $15 million | — | Total available liquidity was approximately $20 million |
Business and Operating Performance
Marketing productivity was the principal pressure point. Management said Google’s AI Overviews increasingly kept consumers within Google’s platform, reducing clicks to AirSculpt’s website even as competition for traffic remained unchanged. Leads declined 16%, while cost per lead rose 26%.
The company is optimizing its website and content for AI-generated search results, including efforts to secure citations within AI answers. It is also expanding local and community marketing, customer reviews, educational content and patient outreach to reduce dependence on Google. AirSculpt expects incremental brand marketing spending of $3 million versus last year, below the $5 million indicated in the prior quarter.
Several centers also experienced more pronounced issues in marketing, sales or operations. Management said corrective actions are underway, although some improvements could take several months.
GLP-1-related procedures remained a growth area. AirSculpt performed 250 such procedures during the quarter, or nearly 10% of total cases. These services are available in almost all centers and address stubborn fat, excess loose skin and volume loss associated with GLP-1 use.
AirSculpt is also expanding alloClae, which can serve patients without enough fat for a traditional fat transfer. The service was available in a handful of centers during the quarter, with management citing encouraging initial demand.
Management Guidance
AirSculpt now expects full-year 2026 revenue of $144 million-$146 million, down from its previous outlook of $151 million-$157 million.
Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be $9 million-$10 million, compared with the prior guidance range of $12 million-$14 million.
The revised outlook assumes that fiscal Q3 challenges continue through the fourth quarter. Management said the outcome will depend on the pace of improvements in AI-related marketing effectiveness and execution at underperforming centers.
Refinancing and Liquidity
AirSculpt completed a new $44 million credit facility consisting of a $39 million term loan and a $5 million revolver. The facility matures in 2031.
The interest rate is SOFR plus 775 basis points and steps down as leverage declines. Management said this represents an increase of about 300 basis points from the previous facility, but provides lower near-term amortization, greater covenant headroom and more financial flexibility.
The company ended the quarter with approximately $15 million in cash and roughly $20 million in total available liquidity. Near-term priorities remain improving same-center sales and execution across existing locations.
Risks and Watchpoints
- Continued expansion of AI-generated search results could pressure website traffic, lead volumes and customer acquisition efficiency.
- A handful of centers face execution challenges across marketing, sales or operations, with some fixes expected to require several months.
- Management described the consumer environment as choppy, although AirSculpt’s customer base generally has household income above $100,000 and may be relatively more insulated.
- GLP-1-related procedures require more patient education and a different marketing and sales approach than legacy services.
- The refinancing extends debt maturity and improves flexibility but carries a higher interest rate than the prior facility.
Analyst Q&A Highlights
Management said consumer search intent for aesthetic procedures remained relatively stable and conversion rates held steady once AirSculpt captured a lead. The main disruption occurred between search activity and lead generation as Google retained more users within AI-generated results.
On GLP-1 services, management said patient engagement tends to be deeper and longer because consumers require more education about available procedures. The company is focused on accelerating commercialization but did not provide a timeline for a volume inflection.
Regarding center performance, management identified marketing, sales and operations as the three main areas behind location-level variability. Some corrective measures have already been implemented, while others will take longer.
Full Earnings Call Transcript
Complete Earnings Call Transcript
Management Remarks
Operator
Greetings, and welcome to the AirSculpt Technologies Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call.
[Operator Instructions]
Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Allison Malkin. Please go ahead.
Allison Malkin
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss AirSculpt Technologies results for the third quarter of fiscal 2026. Joining me on this call today are Yogi Jashnani, Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Arthur, Chief Financial Officer. For this morning's call, Yogi will begin with a review of our third quarter results and highlight the progress made on our strategic priorities. Then Michael will share a detailed review of our third quarter performance and guidance.
Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this conference call may include forward-looking statements.
These statements may include our future expectations regarding financial results and guidance, market opportunities and our growth. Risks and uncertainties that may impact these statements and could cause actual future results to differ materially from currently projected results are described in this morning's press release and the reports we will file with the SEC, all of which can be found on our website at investors.airsculpt.com.
We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements or information, except as required by law. During our call today, we will also reference non-GAAP financial measures. We use non-GAAP measures in some of our financial discussions as we believe they more accurately represent the true operational performance and underlying results of our business. A reconciliation of these measures can be found in our earnings release as filed this morning and in our most recent 10-K, which will also be available on our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Yogi.
Yogesh Jashnani
Thank you, Allison, and good morning, everyone. Let me start with the quarter. Our third quarter results were disappointing. While we expected a revenue decline, our performance fell short of our goals, reflecting lower productivity from our marketing investments and underperformance in a handful of clinics. We understand what drove the shortfall, and we are moving with urgency to address it.
This quarter presented challenges, but it does not change our conviction in the strategy or the opportunity ahead of us. 3 things reinforce that conviction. First, we performed 250 GLP-1-related procedures in the quarter, representing nearly 10% of total cases. We believe we are in the early innings of GLP-1-related aesthetic procedure growth. Second, conversion held steady, which indicates that we continue to be effective once we engage our patients. And third, we also continue to strengthen the foundation of the business.
This morning, we announced the refinancing of our term loan, extending our maturity to 2031 and giving us greater financial flexibility to support long-term growth, including de novo expansion.
Now turning to the 2 areas that held back performance in the quarter. The first is marketing, specifically the growing impact of Google's AI Overviews on how consumers find us. The second is performance issues in a handful of centers.
Let me start with AI Overviews. AI is changing how consumers discover and evaluate aesthetic providers, and it is increasingly affecting many businesses that rely on search for discovery. According to separate industry reports, queries featuring AI Overviews have now risen to nearly 90% of health care-related queries. For us, this meant fewer Google clicks because Google increasingly keeps consumers on its own platform, while competition for those clicks remained unchanged. That led to 16% lower leads versus prior year and 26% higher cost per lead in the quarter, impacting both revenue and profitability.
Consumers are still interested in aesthetic procedures. We are focused on ensuring we appropriately capture that interest while the consumer search behavior is changing. We are beginning to see early signs of improvement in our presence in AI-generated search results.
We're also investing more in brand and local marketing to drive traffic that does not depend on Google.
Second, we experienced performance issues at a handful of centers. We recognize varying performance across centers is expected. However, this quarter, certain locations experienced operational challenges that we are working to course correct. These are within our control, and we are implementing targeted actions to improve performance at these locations. As we have shared in the past, transformations are not always linear, and this quarter reflects just that. I remain confident that we are better positioned today with a larger addressable market and the right actions in place to achieve sustained profitable growth.
Let me now turn to our progress on our 3 strategic priorities. As a reminder, these are: first, introducing new services to capture our GLP-1 market opportunity, enhancing our sales and marketing strategy; and maintaining strong financial discipline. First, introducing new services to capture our GLP-1 market opportunity. As a reminder, we introduced new services over the past year to capture the demand created by the GLP-1 transformation. We believe we are still in the early stages of this opportunity.
According to Gallup, 11% of U.S. adults or approximately 30 million people were using GLP-1 medications for weight loss in 2026, up from 3% in 2024. Additionally, McKinsey reports that 60% of U.S. consumers are actively trying to lose weight, while the American Society of Plastic Surgeons reported double-digit growth in several skin removal and lifting procedures in 2025.
Longer term, we believe procedures addressing the side effects of GLP-1s continue to represent a potential $100 million revenue opportunity across our existing center base. alloClae, which we announced last quarter, is another example of our focus on serving the GLP-1 patient population. With alloClae, we can reach patients we previously could not serve, including those without enough fat for a traditional fat transfer. It is currently available in a handful of centers. While early, we are encouraged by the initial response and are expanding it across our center network.
As we evolve from traditional fat removal to a more comprehensive body contouring platform, we are learning and refining our approach to patient education and sales execution. While these new procedures fit well within our existing business model, they require us to modify our marketing and sales compared to our traditional offerings. We are improving our ability to capture patient interest and convert that interest into completed procedures. We believe these efforts will enable us to accelerate the volume of newer procedures across our center network and increase center productivity.
Our second area of focus is enhancing our sales and marketing strategy. As I mentioned earlier, we are adapting our marketing strategy to changes in how consumers discover and evaluate aesthetic procedures. We continue to optimize our website for AI-driven search, including Google AI overviews and are strengthening our digital content, customer reviews and educational resources to improve visibility. While still early, we began to see encouraging movement in certain leading indicators following these changes.
We are also leveraging AI tools internally to improve patient follow-up and sales conversion, which further contributes to the relative stability in our conversion rates.
In addition, we are expanding our grassroot marketing efforts to build stronger connections within the communities we serve. We are increasing our focus on localized marketing initiatives and patient education opportunities to generate awareness, drive engagement and bring more prospective patients into our centers. Next week, on November 12, we will host our first-ever open house event across all 31 centers, bringing together surgeons and prospective patients through a combination of in-person experiences and virtual educational programming. The event is designed to engage prospective patients, reconnect with those who have previously expressed interest and drive consultations and bookings while extending our reach through local partnerships and digital content.
As it relates to brand marketing, we expect to spend an incremental $3 million versus last year. This amount is lower than the $5 million we indicated last quarter, which we believe is prudent given the environment and current business performance. We're also focused on improving sales productivity and execution across our center network. To this end, we are actively implementing best practices from our stronger performing locations across the portfolio to improve sales effectiveness and conversion.
Turning to our third priority, maintaining strong financial discipline. As I mentioned earlier, we have completed the refinancing of our existing term loan, providing greater financial flexibility to support our long-term strategy, including future de novo expansion. Michael will share more details on this shortly. We continue to make progress strengthening our financial position and ended the quarter with approximately $15 million in cash and $20 million in total available liquidity. While our near-term focus remains on improving same-center sales and strengthening execution across our existing centers, we continue to view de novo expansion, additional service lines and strategic partnerships as a meaningful long-term growth opportunity.
In summary, while our third quarter proved more challenging, we continue to see evidence that our GLP-1 strategy is the right one with growing demand from these patients and increasing traction across our expanded procedure offerings. We continue to make progress advancing our strategic initiatives and strengthening the foundation of our business. We are implementing targeted marketing initiatives and taking steps to improve performance across our centers. Our updated outlook contemplates third quarter performance trends continue into the fourth quarter, which we believe is prudent. That said, we are intently focused on returning to stability and accelerating our path to growth. With that, I will now turn the call over to Michael to review our third quarter financial results and outlook.
Michael Arthur
Thank you, Yogi, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to begin with this morning's announcement that we completed our debt refinancing. This has been a priority for us over the last 9 months, and we are pleased with the results. The new $44 million facility made up of $39 million term loan and a $5 million revolver matures in 2031 and gives us greater long-term financial flexibility. We filed the credit agreement this morning under an 8-K with the SEC. This is a significant milestone, and it's worth putting in context. We successfully deleveraged over the last 2 years, and that combined with improved financial performance and stabilization we achieved over the past 9 months is what allowed us to complete this refinance on the terms we did.
With that, let me walk through the third quarter results. Revenue was $31.9 million, a decrease of 8.7% versus the prior year quarter. On a same-center basis, excluding London, revenue declined approximately 7.5%, reflecting a 9.6% decline in case volume, partially offset by a 2.3% increase in average selling price. Average selling price was approximately $12,900, well within our historical range.
Gross margin expanded to roughly 60% of revenue compared to 57.5% in the prior year quarter. That expansion reflects broad-based operating efficiencies and cost disciplines across our centers, including the benefits of closing our London center. SG&A was approximately $20.3 million, an increase of about $700,000 versus the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting higher marketing spend and professional expenses. Customer acquisition cost was roughly $3,800 per case compared to approximately $3,100 last year.
As Yogi discussed, that increase is primarily driven by AI overviews, which impacted traffic and leads reaching our website in the period. We're responding by diversifying our channels and optimizing our digital presence to improve efficiencies. Adjusted EBITDA was approximately $400,000 or roughly 1.2% of revenue compared to $3 million or 8.7% of revenue in the prior year quarter. The decline primarily reflects lower revenue and reduced operating leverage, partially offset by continued cost disciplines.
Turning to guidance. As you saw in our release, we're updating our full year 2026 outlook to reflect third quarter performance and our expectations for the balance of the year. We now expect revenue of $144 million to $146 million compared to our previous outlook of $151 million to $157 million and adjusted EBITDA of $9 million to $10 million compared to our previous outlook of $12 million to $14 million. This outlook assumes the challenges we saw in Q3 continue through the fourth quarter, which we believe is the prudent approach.
As it relates to our balance sheet, we ended the quarter with roughly $15 million in cash and $5 million available on our revolver, resulting in roughly $20 million of liquidity available to the company at the end of the quarter. Transformations are rarely linear and Q3 was a clear example of that, but I'm proud of the progress that we've made, a much stronger balance sheet with greater long-term financial flexibility, a more efficient cost structure and a clear plan to address the challenges in front of us. With disciplined operations, continued cost efficiencies and the long-term financial flexibility our refinancing provides, I'm confident in our ability to execute and to capitalize on the growth opportunities ahead. And with that, I'll turn it back to Yogi for closing remarks.
Yogesh Jashnani
Thank you, Michael. In closing, I want to thank our team for their hard work and dedication. While our third quarter performance was below the stability we achieved in the first half, we have made meaningful progress strengthening our business and have identified and are focused on the right strategies to improve our performance. Since last year, same-center sales trends have improved approximately 19 percentage points. We believe our expanded GLP-1-related procedures, evolving AI search strategy, enhanced lead generation efforts and continued focus on center-level execution position us well for growth. The combination of these efforts, along with the increased financial flexibility from our new term loan gives us a stronger platform to achieve sustainable, profitable long-term growth and value creation for our shareholders. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to the operator to begin the question-and-answer portion of the call.
Operator
[Operator Instructions]
Our first question will come from Sam Eiber with U.S. Bancorp BTIG.
Question-and-Answer Session
Sam Eiber
Maybe I can start on some of the challenges called out related to the Google AI search engine. And I just want to make sure I'm understanding this right. So it sounds like there's still patient interest in aesthetic procedures. They're using the search engines, but maybe they're just not being funneled at the same rate to your website. So I just want to make sure I'm understanding that right. And then I guess, second, how are you looking to maybe overcome some of those challenges? Do you need to redirect investments elsewhere? Just curious how you're looking to respond to that.
Yogesh Jashnani
Sam, this is Yogi. Thank you for the question. Look, you're absolutely right. We continue to see that the demand for overall aesthetic procedures is staying consistent with past quarters, which is encouraging. And we are also seeing that our conversion rate is holding steady. So when we capture the lead, we are able to convert the patients, they are still showing the same interest and engagement with the AirSculpt brand.
A little bit more on what's been changing in Google AI search. So over the past few months, Google updated their AI search capabilities. That has progressively impacted how consumers research and find our services. Google tends to keep them within their own platform. This change in Google is impacting many consumer companies and many have called it out in the Q3 results. We have implemented countermeasures. That's things like being cited within AI answers and starting to see good traction there.
That's within our control, and that will help us overcome some of these challenges.
Secondly, we are building out our channels that don't depend on Google, such as local and community marketing and open house next week across all of our centers. And lastly, continuing to engage with patients to make sure that our conversion rate holds strong. So I have confidence that we are taking the right steps, and we're starting to see early signs of that. It will take some time for that to show up in our revenue numbers for sure, which is where the guidance comes in.
Sam Eiber
Okay. That's a really helpful explanation. And then maybe I can just use my follow-up here. It's a little bit of a higher-level question, but just curious on AirSculpt's brand and ability to still win and capture new patients. If that's changed at all just in terms of consumer reception to the brand? Is it still -- has it changed at all? And how you view AirSculpt within the marketplace generally versus other independent plastic surgeons?
Yogesh Jashnani
Yes. Sam, thanks for that. We still see a very strong reason for us to win and take market share in the long term. Based that on 3 things, 1, as I said, when people engage with our brand, people are still searching for the AirSculpt brand and when they engage with us, we are seeing conversion holding steady. Secondly, our strategic bet on changes in aesthetics, particularly as it relates to GLP-1 procedures, you're starting to see that play out. So consumers are responding positively to that. That's partially the strength of the brand, which is coming into play. And thirdly, as you think about whether it's Google AI overviews or the likes, everyone is impacted equally with that. We have the marketing depth and frankly, the strength of the organization to be able to pivot, invest in that and overcome those challenges. I would argue, faster than anybody else. We just need to bring that to bear.
Operator
And our next question will come from Kyle Bauser with Titan Partners.
Kyle Bauser
Maybe can you talk a little bit about trends in October and early November? It looks like the full year guidance assumes a step down in Q4 as well. So just kind of curious how things are kind of trending so far.
Michael Arthur
Yes. Kyle, this is Michael. On guidance, I think where our guidance landed in -- for the full year is basically a reflection of kind of Q3 trends continuing through Q4. And it's really what kind of will dictate that really is just the pace in which we're able to kind of evolve those 2 key areas that Yogi mentioned on the call, which is around our ability to kind of meet or evolve our marketing strategy around the AI reviews. And then second, there are a handful of centers that had executional issues in Q3 that we are improving and the pace of that is going to dictate, kind of, where Q4 lands in the full year.
Kyle Bauser
Got it. And then I'm not sure I caught all the details, but any more terms of the refinance debt you can walk through kind of interest rate, et cetera?
Michael Arthur
Yes. Yes. So the terms, we're excited about where we landed on the refi. So it's a 5-year term loan, $44 million facility, $39 million term loan, $5 million revolver. Interest rate is around -- is SOFR plus 775 and it steps down as leverage decreases over time. That's about a 300-basis point increase from the old facility that we had in place. We also structured in a way and designed in a way that provides us a lot more flexibility short term, lower amort payments, more cushion on covenants to allow us to execute these key initiatives that we think are important for us and provide necessary liquidity short term to make necessary investments. And so yes, we're excited. It's -- frankly, it's a pretty plain vanilla term loan, but glad to have it past us and extend the maturity out to 2031.
Operator
And we'll go next to Jeremy Pearlman with Maxim Group.
Jeremy Pearlman
So firstly, just I know you're attributing most of the same -- the case volume decline to the AI generated and how that's affecting getting in front of clients. But what gives you confidence that your client base really is not impacted at all by some maybe weakness in the economy, some inflation, higher gas prices, et cetera? Like how should we look at the profile of your customer base?
Yogesh Jashnani
Jeremy, thank you for the question. This is Yogi. Look, for the consumer base, we've called it out -- as we've called it out before, consumer is still choppy. We continue to see that. Having said that, our consumer tends to be higher income, so average above $100,000. And this is someone with discretionary income that she's willing to invest in herself. We're seeing that population is slightly more insulated, certainly not completely insulated in the current economy. As it relates to Q3, though, we are seeing that demand, which we would measure through search intent, that held relatively stable. The bigger gap came from how that demand went from search intent to leads, and that's why we are calling that out as the primary driver over here in Q3.
Jeremy Pearlman
Okay. Understood. And then just my second question relating to maybe, the GLP-1, the patients who are using that, is that a higher -- how should we look at the conversion rate for a patient who's coming in for the GLP-1 procedures versus maybe some of your legacy procedures?
Yogesh Jashnani
Yes. So GLP-1 procedures, just as a reminder, are things like fat removal of stubborn fat deposits, addressing excess loose skin as well as loss of volume, which are the side effects of GLP-1s, which we are able to address. We introduced these approximately a year ago, and now they have grown to 10% of our total procedure mix. That growth, that acceleration is a strong indicator that the procedures are resonating. Our brand is resonating with these consumers as well. We continue to see that folks who are coming in for GLP-1-related procedures, they need a little bit more education on what are the options that are available to them. So the engagement is a little bit deeper and a little bit longer, but we continue to see that they are converting and they are engaging with the brand. There's a ton more upside. We're in really early innings over here. We see this as a long-term $100 million-plus as a revenue opportunity.
Operator
And our last question will come from Ben Haynor with Lake Street.
Benjamin Haynor
First off for me on the GLP-1-associated procedures, it seems like you've been ratcheting those higher by about 50 per quarter. Can you talk a little bit about how many centers that those are in and kind of when we should see an inflection beyond adding an additional 50 or so a quarter?
Yogesh Jashnani
Ben, thank you for the question. So we now have GLP-1-related procedures in almost all of our centers. There is 1 or 2 which wouldn't have that or which wouldn't be doing that at scale.
From an inflection perspective, that's our next area of focus. So as you remember, what we had said and what we've been doing is, first, pilot new procedures, run it for a few months, make sure that the results are up to par to where we can stand behind those as a brand and our medical protocols and processes are refined. Those usually take a few months.
Now we've reached a point where all of that has been addressed. Now we are pivoting more towards how do we get more consumers in through the door. There is a slight different approach, as I alluded to earlier. Folks who are looking for solutions to GLP-1 side effects, they need a slightly different marketing approach. They need a slightly different sales approach. That's what we are actively working on, on how to accelerate the commercialization. I don't have the time line, but that's an active work in progress right now.
Benjamin Haynor
Okay. And can you talk a little bit about -- well, like the cohort of the first 5 that have those procedures available, how they're doing versus the ones that kind of just came on?
Yogesh Jashnani
Yes. Ben, we don't have -- at these volumes, as you can imagine, we're not breaking it out as much into those cohorts. What I would say is across the board, we are seeing relatively stable consumer interest across all of our locations. I'm not seeing any degradation in cohorts that came online later. Remember, the activation was primarily marketing focused towards the end because we had already refined our procedures and our surgeons are more than skilled to do all of these procedures.
Benjamin Haynor
Okay. That makes sense. And then lastly for me on kind of the performance of centers, the operational issues that you've identified and corrected. Can you give any examples of what those are? People just forgetting to unlock the office? Is it more profound? What's the story on that?
Yogesh Jashnani
Yes. Ben, thankfully, it's not forgetting to unlock the office for sure. But to operate a successful center, 3 main factors need to come together in our business: marketing to drive the leads, sales to convert them and operations to execute on those. As with any multiunit, there's always a variability in performance. At these handful of centers, we experienced challenges in 1 of these 3 areas that were more pronounced than what we would typically encounter in the normal course of business. Specific issues varied by location, but all fall within these 3 areas, whether it's marketing, sales or operations. And these performance challenges are within our control. It's something we're actively addressing. Some solutions are well underway and fixed and some will take a few months to address. But for the ones which are longer, we are taking steps to mitigate the impact in the meantime.
Operator
And this now concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Yogesh Jashnani for closing comments.
Yogesh Jashnani
Thank you again for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you at upcoming investor conferences and when we report Q4.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.
This article may include AI-generated content that is human-reviewed, which is for reference and general information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Recommended Articles










Comments (0)
Click the $ button, enter the symbol, and select to link a stock, ETF, or other ticker.