tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
Search

Angel Oak Mortgage REIT (AOMR) Q3 2026 Earnings Call: Book Value Falls on Rate Pressure

Nov 3, 2026 8:01 PM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
View all comments(0)

Angel Oak Mortgage REIT reported a Q3 2026 GAAP net loss of $16.7 million, driven by $24.4 million in net realized and unrealized securitization losses. Distributable earnings rose to $6.4 million, while interest income increased 16% year over year to $42.5 million. GAAP book value per share fell 11.5% to $8.97, and economic book value declined 6.5% to $11.45 due to higher rates and non-QM spread widening. Management noted stable underlying credit performance, with 90-day-plus delinquencies flat at 2.1%. New investment returns are expected to recover toward the 15%–20% target range as higher-coupon mortgage locks flow through.

AI-generated summary

Key Takeaways

  • Angel Oak Mortgage REIT reported a Q3 2026 GAAP net loss of $16.7 million, or $0.72 per diluted share, primarily due to $24.4 million of net realized and unrealized losses related to its securitization portfolio.
  • Distributable earnings increased to $6.4 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, from $0.5 million, or $0.02 per share, in Q3 2025.
  • GAAP book value declined 11.5% quarter over quarter to $8.97 per share. Economic book value fell 6.5% to $11.45 per share, reflecting higher rates and wider non-QM spreads rather than weaker underlying credit performance.
  • Interest income rose 16% year over year to $42.5 million as target assets increased, while net interest income remained flat at $10.2 million.
  • The company purchased $233.1 million of loans and completed two securitizations during the quarter. A third securitization closed in October 2026.
  • Management said returns on current investments were below its 15%–20% target but could recover to that range as newer mortgage locks near an 8% coupon flow through, provided interest rates remain near current levels.

Key Financial Data

MetricQ3 2026Comparison / Commentary
GAAP net income (loss)$(16.7) million$11.4 million in Q3 2025
GAAP diluted EPS$(0.72)$0.46 in Q3 2025
Distributable earnings$6.4 million$0.5 million in Q3 2025
Distributable earnings per diluted share$0.28$0.02 in Q3 2025
Interest income$42.5 millionUp 16% from $36.7 million in Q3 2025
Net interest income$10.2 millionFlat year over year
Operating expenses$2.1 millionIncreased marginally due to loan diligence and valuation costs
Loan purchases$233.1 million7.21% weighted average coupon
GAAP book value per share$8.97Down 11.5% from $10.13 at Q2 2026 end
Economic book value per share$11.45Down 6.5% from $12.24 at Q2 2026 end
Cash$49 millionAt quarter-end
Recourse debt-to-equity ratio2.0xAt quarter-end
Portfolio-wide 90-day-plus delinquency2.1%Flat versus Q2 2026 end
Common dividend$0.32 per sharePayable November 30, 2026

Business and Operating Performance

Loan purchases carried a weighted average combined loan-to-value ratio of 71.8% and a weighted average credit score of 758. Management said these purchases remained within the company’s established credit and return parameters. Current mortgage locks averaged approximately a 7.9% coupon.

AOMR executed the $280 million AOMT 2026-3 securitization early in the quarter. Its underlying loans had a 6.9% weighted average coupon, a weighted average non-zero credit score of 757 and a 69% weighted average CLTV. The AAA-rated senior bonds priced at 130 basis points over the Treasury yield curve.

The company also contributed $71 million of loans to the $221 million AOMT 2026-HB1 HELOC securitization. The underlying pool carried a 9.79% weighted average coupon, a weighted average non-zero credit score of 744 and a 64.8% weighted average CLTV.

In late October, AOMR closed the $250 million AOMT 2026-6 securitization. The pool had a 7.25% weighted average coupon, a weighted average non-zero credit score of 754 and a 71.6% weighted average CLTV.

At quarter-end, the company held $294 million of unsecuritized residential whole loans financed by $255 million of warehouse debt, $2.3 billion of residential loans in securitization trusts and $203 million of RMBS. It also had approximately $1 billion of undrawn loan financing capacity across four lending partners.

Three-month prepayment speeds for AOMR’s non-QM RMBS securitized loan portfolios declined to 11.2% from 15.2% at the end of Q2. The company continues to model investments using historical average prepayment assumptions of approximately 20%–30%.

Management Guidance

Management continues to expect approximately one securitization per quarter, or four per year.

Returns on new investments were temporarily below the company’s 15%–20% target after rates increased faster than mortgage locks could adjust. Management said newer locks around an 8% coupon should improve returns and could bring the next set of locks back to the target range, assuming the interest-rate environment remains similar.

The company plans to maintain disciplined underwriting and capital deployment rather than weaken credit standards to pursue incremental returns.

Risks and Watchpoints

Higher short-term yields and an upward shift in the yield curve pressured asset values and book value during the quarter. Management estimated that rate movements and non-QM spread widening contributed roughly equally to the decline.

AOMR hedges the base-rate exposure associated with securitization execution but does not hedge credit spreads, overall book value, securitized assets or retained bond positions after securitization. Management characterized the pressure on retained interests primarily as mark-to-market risk; expected cash flows would require credit performance outside its assumptions to change materially.

Although financing facilities were renewed at lower spreads, higher underlying base rates offset much of the immediate benefit. Wider capital-markets spreads could also reduce exit options for weaker underwriting programs across the market.

Analyst Q&A Highlights

Management estimated that book value had recovered by approximately two percentage points early in Q4 as market conditions became somewhat more favorable.

On capital allocation, management said liquidity remained strong and noted that the latest securitization generated slightly more than $20 million of proceeds. Share repurchases remain an option, but the company is weighing potential buybacks against retaining capital for investments if returns widen back toward target levels.

The 2029 notes became callable in July, but management said refinancing was not currently economically attractive. The company hopes market conditions may provide an opportunity to refinance at lower rates or repay the notes over the next few years.

AOMR reduced HELOC purchases after participating in AOMT 2026-HB1, while management described both non-QM and HELOC volumes as stable. It also noted that higher mortgage rates may support HELOC demand because borrowers may prefer incremental borrowing rather than refinancing an existing mortgage.

Full Earnings Call Transcript


Complete Earnings Call Transcript

Management Remarks

Operator

Good day, and welcome to the Angel Oak Mortgage REIT's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Randy Chrisman. Please go ahead.

Randy Chrisman

Good morning. Thank you for joining us today for Angel Oak Mortgage REIT's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call.

This morning, we filed a press release detailing these results, which is available in the Investors section on our website at www.angeloakreit.com. As a reminder, remarks made on today's conference call may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed today. We do not undertake any obligation to update our forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. For a more detailed discussion of the factors that may affect the company's results, please refer to our earnings release for this quarter and to our most recent SEC filings.

During this call, we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. More information about these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are contained in our earnings release and SEC filings.

This morning's conference call is hosted by Angel Oak Mortgage REIT's Chief Executive Officer, Sreeni Prabhu; and Chief Financial Officer, Brandon Filson. Management will make some prepared comments, after which we will open up the call to your questions. Additionally, we recommend reviewing our earnings supplement posted on our website.

Now I will turn the call over to Sreeni.

Sreeniwas Prabhu

Thank you, Randy, and thank you all for joining us today. During the quarter, non-QM and the fixed income market became more challenging as higher rate and a shift upward in the yield curve pressured asset valuations and compressed financing spreads across mortgage credit market. While this environment negatively impacted book values across the landscape as expected, Angel Oak's underlying credit performance of our portfolio remains stable and continue to perform in line with our expectations. We believe this distinction is important as the valuation pressure we experienced reflects broader market environments rather than deterioration in credit quality or performance of our underlying loans.

Notably, we completed 2 securitizations early in the period ahead of the more pronounced increase in rates during August and September. Additionally, despite less favorable conditions, we completed a third securitization in October to mitigate potential further interest rate risk. This consistent access to securitization markets provides us with an important tool to manage financing risk, recycle capital and support the long-term return profile of the portfolio across varying interest rate levels.

We also renewed and extended several financing facilities at reduced spreads during the quarter, reflecting our continued focus on actively managing funding costs, although higher underlying interest rates have offset that near-term benefit. While broader non-QM origination volumes have declined and the higher rate environment has temporarily compressed current returns on new investments, we continue to source and purchase loans that meet our credit and return criteria.

Our structure and position within the Angel Oak organization will continue to be a competitive advantage in a competitive market. We remain deliberate in pacing of our capital deployment across loan vintages and disciplined in maintaining underwriting standards that are central to our strategy rather than extending risk and pursuing incremental returns at the expense of long-term credit performance. We believe that this prudent approach will serve us and our shareholders well and will continue to provide its value through pockets of volatile and challenging interest rate environment.

Looking ahead, our priorities remain consistent. We will continue to focus on disciplined credit underwriting, thoughtful capital deployment and maintaining access to securitization markets, while positioning the portfolio to perform across a range of market environments. We remain confident in the underlying credit performance of our investments and in the strength of the Angel Oak platform.

With that, I'll turn it over to Brandon, who will walk us through our third quarter financial performance in greater detail.

Brandon Filson

Thank you, Sreeni. During the quarter, the upward pressure on shorter-term yields negatively impacted reported book value as expected. That being said, the underlying portfolio performed in line with our expectations with low levels of delinquencies and continued growth in the target asset portfolio.

For the third quarter, we reported a GAAP net loss of $16.7 million or $0.72 per diluted common share compared with GAAP net income of $11.4 million or $0.46 per diluted common share in the third quarter of 2025. The primary driver of the loss was a $24.4 million net realized and unrealized net loss related to our securitization portfolio. This was largely attributable to the previously mentioned unrealized valuation declines during the last quarter.

Notably, distributable earnings for the quarter were $6.4 million or $0.28 per diluted common share compared with $0.5 million or $0.02 per diluted common share in the prior period. The primary drivers of the difference between distributable earnings and GAAP net income for the third quarter of 2026 were adjustments to exclude unrealized losses from our residential loans, the residential loans held in securitization trust, nonrecourse securitization obligations and derivative portfolios. During the quarter, we completed 2 securitizations with $1.8 million of securitization costs reflected in this distributable earnings metric.

Interest income for the quarter was $42.5 million, while net interest income was $10.2 million. This compares favorably with interest income of $36.7 million and net interest income of $10.2 million in the third quarter of 2025. Interest income increased 16%, while net interest income remained relatively flat. We've generated $5.8 million greater interest income for Q3 compared to the comparable period of 2025, driven by increases in the amount of our target assets.

Operating expenses for the third quarter were $2.1 million. Our operating expenses increased marginally compared to the comparative period due to increases in loan diligence fees and valuation costs associated with a larger overall balance in our target asset portfolio.

Loan purchases during the quarter totaled $233.1 million. The weighted average coupon on loans purchased during the quarter was 7.21% with a weighted average CLTV of 71.8% and a weighted average credit score of 758. These purchases continue to be well in line with the credit and return parameters we have discussed as our targets in prior quarters. Current mortgage locks averaged approximately a 7.9% coupon, reflecting the recent increase in rates as it flows through the mortgage origination process.

At the beginning of Q3, we executed the AOMT 2026-3 securitization. We were the sole contributor to the deal, which had $280 million unpaid principal balance and a weighted average coupon of 6.9%, weighted average non-zero credit score of 757 and a weighted average CLTV of 69%. The AAA-rated senior bonds priced at 130 basis point spread over the Treasury yield curve. Additionally, we participated in AOMT 2026-HB1, a $221 million co-mingled HELOC securitization to which we contributed $71 million in loans. Loans underlying the deal had a weighted average coupon of 9.79%, weighted average non-zero credit score of 744 and a weighted average CLTV of 64.8%. Securitization markets have remained constructive amid market uncertainty, and we continue to expect to execute roughly 1 securitization per quarter or 4 per year.

We also closed AOMT 2026-6 in late October 2026, which had a $250 million unpaid principal balance, a weighted average coupon of 7.25%, weighted average non-zero credit score of 754 and a weighted average CLTV of 71.6%. Additionally, we remained active on the financing front during the period. We renewed and rolled several financing facilities during the quarter at lower spreads. While the higher underlying base rates offset much of the immediate benefit, the lower spreads have improved the economics of those facilities and reflect our continued focus on actively managing financing costs. This will remain particularly important as we manage the portfolio through the existing rate environment.

As of quarter end, GAAP book value per share was $8.97, down 11.5% from $10.13 at the end of the second quarter. Economic book value per share, which fair values all nonrecourse securitization obligations, was $11.45 per share, down 6.5% from $12.24 at the end of Q2. The change in book value during the quarter was primarily driven by noncash mark-to-market valuation declines across the portfolio with higher rates and the upward shift in yield curve pressured asset values, partially offset by earnings generated during the quarter. As Sreeni noted, these valuation movements did not reflect a deterioration in the underlying credit performance of the portfolio.

Our balance sheet has remained well positioned with $49 million in cash and a recourse debt-to-equity ratio of 2x. We ended the quarter with unsecuritized residential whole loans at a fair value of $294 million, financed with $255 million of warehouse debt, $2.3 billion of residential loans in securitization trust and $203 million of RMBS. We also maintained approximately $1 billion of undrawn loan financing capacity across 4 lending partners.

Credit performance remained solid during the quarter with portfolio-wide 90-day plus delinquency of approximately 2.1%, flat compared to the end of the second quarter. Three-month prepayment speeds for our non-QM RMBS securitized loan portfolios were 11.2% at the end of the quarter compared with 15.2% at the end of the second quarter. We continue to model our investments using historical average prepayment assumptions of approximately 20% to 30%.

Lastly, the company declared a $0.32 per share common dividend payable on November 30, 2026, to common stockholders of record as of November 23, 2026. For additional detail on our financial results and portfolio composition, please refer to the earnings supplement available on our website.

Sreeniwas Prabhu

Thank you, Brandon. The proven, well-established Angel Oak origination, purchase and securitization platform provides us with the confidence to perform well in a variety of macro environments. The fundamental backdrop for our business is positive. And while risk remains, we will continue to focus on what we can control, expansion of earnings, consistent securitization market activity and disciplined credit selection and management.

With that, we will open the call for your questions. Operator?

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Doug Harter with BTIG.

Question-and-Answer Session

Douglas Harter

In the press release, you've talked about kind of the near-term impact on returns from higher rates. I'm wondering if you could quantify that and then kind of how you think about what gets you back to kind of the historical normalized level that you have talked about?

Brandon Filson

Right now, there's -- as rates rose and we're buying loans, locks take 30, 60 days to run through the process. Current returns are not quite as good as we expect that 15% to 20% level. However, they're starting to recover with new locks coming in at around 8%. That's going to pull that back up a little bit lower than our target. But so we -- I mean, I expect if this rate environment stays the way it is, then the next set of locks we get over the next month that we'll be back to the 15% to 20% level, provided that the interest rate environment stays similar to what it is today.

Douglas Harter

That is helpful. And I guess, can you just talk about, I guess, as you go through periods of volatility, kind of what is the hedging? What is the forward commitment and ways that you look to protect yourself from this volatility?

Brandon Filson

Really, what we do, we're hedging the securitization execution on the base rate side. We're not hedging the spread. So over the last quarter, obviously, we had hedging making up some of the losses we would have had in terms of securitization proceeds. But we don't -- we're not hedging our book value, the securitized product out there or the retained bond positions once they're securitized.

Douglas Harter

Got it. And just remind us what -- is there any mismatch in the fundamentals or the cash flows of those retained pieces? Or is that more mark-to-market risk versus actual change in expected cash flows?

Brandon Filson

Yes, that's really mark-to-market risk, not yet -- I mean, we have to have some kind of credit problem to change our -- outside of our expectation to change our expected cash flows on our retained pieces.

Operator

The next question comes from Marissa Lobo with UBS.

Ameeta Lobo Nelson

Just a follow-up on the book value question. How much of that was due to rate moves versus non-QM spread widening? And also on the retained interest, is that just mainly driven from rate mark-to-market? Or is there also some spread widening in that?

Brandon Filson

Yes. I mean, I would say it's -- this quarter is kind of everything. If you just look at what spreads did on our product, early in the quarter, '26-3 priced at the AAA at 130 over. Then '26-6, which closed just a few days ago, was 160 over on the AAA. And then, of course, the 2- and the 5-year also moved up, shifted up. So it's really kind of a bit of both driving it. It probably almost equal share between the 2.

Ameeta Lobo Nelson

And that's captured in third quarter book value as opposed to...

Brandon Filson

Yes.

Ameeta Lobo Nelson

Okay. So how much -- can you give us a sense of where book value is tracking so far in 4Q?

Brandon Filson

Yes. I think book value has probably made a couple of point recovery as of today, a little bit more favorable environment, but I mean, I would say, again, like, about a 2-point recovery.

Ameeta Lobo Nelson

Got it. That's helpful. And on competition, last quarter, you noted there were some weaker programs that AOMR was unwilling to pursue. How is that looking currently? And is it showing up more in pricing or on credit metrics?

Brandon Filson

Not sure I got that question, Marissa. I'm sorry.

Ameeta Lobo Nelson

I just wanted to understand the competitive environment, if you're seeing that show up more in credit underwriting slipping or more competitive pricing?

Sreeniwas Prabhu

Yes. So this is Sreeni here. So I think if the spreads are widening out, what we're seeing is weaker underwriting is getting priced even wider. So there's been a little bit of weakness in that from a competitor's perspective. And that will show up in whole loan tape selling at slight discounts to market, which we are seeing. We're not seeing that in big proportion to be fair. We're seeing that in small ways, but we're definitely seeing that. What will show up in -- if we continue to see spreads being wider, what it will show up in is that those weaker programs will potentially slow down because there will be no exit in the capital markets.

So yet to be seen from a competitor. But I would like to think that we are seeing that in terms of AAA spreads for other shelves. I hope I answered that question.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Timothy D'Agostino with B. Riley Securities.

Timothy D'Agostino

I guess just on liquidity and capital allocation. Just trying to think through how you all are thinking about it. Does the Board look at a share repurchase program? Is the dividend kind of the key return of capital to shareholders? And then obviously, much longer dated, but the 2029 notes became callable in July. So I just wanted to understand how you think about liquidity position generally and capital allocation going forward.

Brandon Filson

Yes. Timothy, I think our liquidity position is pretty strong today. I mean, again, we've got consistent access to the securitization markets, freeing up. I mean, the last securitization we did, it gave about -- just over $20 million of proceeds, which provides a good amount of runway in terms of buying things back.

And I mean, you mentioned the '29 notes. Today, they're theoretically callable, but not really in the money. I would think from that perspective, we're hopeful over the next few years that the market gives us a better opportunity to call and refinance at lower rates or just to pay off.

And then share repurchase programs, I mean, we've done kind of targeted repurchases here and there. Post IPO, we had a program that we had a couple of targeted ones with Davidson Kempner buying back at what we thought at times opportunistic levels. But obviously, we're very sensitive on the overall size of the balance sheet, what we can do with the capital and what the forecast is. And right now, like I mentioned before, the returns are a little bit compressed. Not too far off from even our dividend yield at today's pricing, but there's an opportunity here where that will widen back out and be where we should keep the capital in the vehicle versus spending the money to repurchase shares and reduce the size, reduce the float of the stock.

Timothy D'Agostino

Okay. Great. And then I guess just a second question, if I can ask here. Just on loan purchases in the quarter, I guess maybe I missed it, but could you break out or maybe just directionally kind of give us some color on non-QM versus HELOC. Just it would be great to hear maybe what the appetite of the market is? Are you seeing more HELOC volume now? Or are you continuing to see more non-QM?

Brandon Filson

Yes. I think from our perspective, the non-QM market is strong. I mean, we personally, AOMR, once we did HB1 or participated in HB1, we pulled back a little bit on the HELOC purchasing for the quarter. So we didn't really purchase too many in the quarter, but that's a switch and a valve that we can turn on and off very easily and source assets out there. I think as rates go up, there's a bit of more HELOC demand than when rates are going down as people have much more propensity to take a little bit of incremental borrowing costs on top of their existing mortgage. But I would think that both volumes are consistent even in a higher rate environment that we had at the end of the last quarter. I mean our mortgage company it's about the same size that it was before. There's been no real drop-off in demand nor any real increase.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I will now transfer the conference over to Brandon Filson. Please go ahead, sir.

Brandon Filson

Yes. Well, good morning. Thank you, everybody, for joining us today. We look forward to connecting with you again next quarter. Have a great day.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect your lines.

This article may include AI-generated content that is human-reviewed, which is for reference and general information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Comments (0)

Click the $ button, enter the symbol, and select to link a stock, ETF, or other ticker.

0/500
Commenting Guidelines
Loading...

Recommended Articles

tradingkey.logo
Risk Warning: Our Website and Mobile App provides only general information on certain investment products. Finsights does not provide, and the provision of such information must not be construed as Finsights providing, financial advice or recommendation for any investment product.
Investment products are subject to significant investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested and may not be suitable for everyone. Past performance of investment products is not indicative of their future performance.
Finsights may allow third party advertisers or affiliates to place or deliver advertisements on our Website or Mobile App or any part thereof and may be compensated by them based on your interaction with the advertisements.
© Copyright: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. All Rights Reserved.