Evergy (EVRG) 2026年第三季度业绩电话会:上调EPS指引,大负荷项目储备扩大
Evergy公布2026年第三季度调整后每股收益为2.58美元,经天气调整后的零售用电需求增长4.5%。公司将2026年每股收益指引上调至4.35至4.50美元,并将季度股息提高4%至每年2.89美元。同时,公司重申到2030年每股收益实现6%至8%+的长期增长目标,未来将依托大负荷电力服务协议及拟议扩建项目支撑业务与资本开支增长。
核心要点
- Evergy公布2026年第三季度调整后收益为6.10亿美元,合每股收益2.58美元,高于2025年第三季度的4.75亿美元(合每股收益2.03美元)。
- 经天气调整后的零售用电需求增长4.5%,主要受商业用电增长8.7%、工业用电增长3.0%以及数据中心和松下(Panasonic)用电量增加的支撑。
- 管理层将2026年调整后每股收益指引从4.14至4.34美元上调至4.35至4.50美元,主要反映了第三季度有利的天气条件以及强劲的运营表现。
- 已签署的五份大负荷电力服务协议(LLPS)连同非LLPS客户,预计随着时间推移将支持3.1吉瓦(GW)的峰值需求。管理层预计,到2030年零售需求年均复合增长率约为7%至8%。
- Evergy已与Digital Realty就其现有600兆瓦(MW)项目旁的1.4吉瓦扩建工程签署了意向书。该潜在扩建项目可能需要约40亿美元的资本投资,但目前尚未纳入当前的五年期财务规划中。
- 公司将季度股息提高4%,使年化股息达到每股2.89美元,同时重申了到2030年调整后每股收益实现6%至8%+长期增长目标的承诺。
关键财务数据
| 指标 | 2026年第三季度 | 2025年第三季度 / 前值 | 评述 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 调整后收益 | 6.10亿美元 | 4.75亿美元 | 需求增加、大客户收入增长、气温偏高以及受监管投资回收 |
| 调整后每股收益 | 2.58美元 | 2.03美元 | 同比增加0.55美元 |
| 年初至今调整后每股收益 | 4.15美元 | 3.41美元 | 截至2026年第三季度累计业绩 |
| 经天气调整后的零售需求增长 | 4.5% | — | 商业用电需求增长8.7%,工业增长3.0%,居民增长0.8% |
| 年初至今经天气调整后的需求增长 | 3.7% | — | 符合管理层全年3%至4%的预期目标 |
| 制冷度日(CDD) | — | 同比+31% | 同时较常年平均水平高出26% |
| 需求、天气及大客户对每股收益的影响 | +0.46美元 | — | 包括数据中心收入及经天气调整后的增长 |
| 受监管投资回收 | +每股0.17美元 | — | 堪萨斯中部零售电价及受FERC监管的投资 |
| 运维、折旧及融资影响 | -每股0.15美元 | — | 包括扣除AFUDC后的更高运维费用、折旧及利息支出 |
| 其他项目 | +每股0.07美元 | — | 同比正向贡献 |
| 年化股息 | 每股2.89美元 | 增长4% | 符合公司50%至60%的长期派息率目标 |
业务与运营表现
Evergy表示,安全、可靠性和发电设备可用率均呈现好于目标的良好态势。在炎热天气以及Evergy与西南电力联营体(SPP)创纪录的峰值用电需求期间,其发电机组均保持了可靠运行。
经天气调整后,商业用电需求增长8.7%,主要受数据中心用电推动。工业用电需求增长3.0%,主要受松下(Panasonic)产能持续攀升驱动。居民用电需求增长0.8%。
已签约大客户的总需求预计将从目前的约350至400兆瓦增至2030年的约2250兆瓦,并在2030年后达到3100兆瓦。已签署的五份大负荷电力服务协议(LLPS)期限通常为16至17年,包含最低月度账单要求以及信用和抵押品保障条款。
Evergy宣布对现有两份协议进行修订,共增加了约110兆瓦的峰值负荷。另一项140兆瓦的扩建修订案则取决于预计于2026年底完成的输电研究结果。
与Digital Realty签订的意向书涵盖现有600兆瓦项目旁的1.4吉瓦扩建工程,使该站点的潜在总规模达到2吉瓦。在获得剩余审批并与拟议的堪萨斯州增强型电价框架保持一致的前提下,管理层预计将于2027年上半年签署正式供电服务协议。
除已签约项目外,Evergy还确定了约2.0至2.5吉瓦的一级(Tier 1)扩建机会,并与潜在新客户就1至2吉瓦的项目展开了深入谈判。管理层对未来最终达成总计5至7吉瓦的大负荷客户协议充满信心。
Evergy还强调了电价的可承受性。管理层表示,自2017年以来,其累计综合电价仅上涨了约7%,而同期区域同行平均上涨25%,整体通胀率达到33%。
管理层业绩指引
Evergy将其2026年调整后每股收益指引从4.14至4.34美元上调至4.35至4.50美元。调整后的区间主要反映了第三季度有利的天气,并计入了第四季度针对配电可靠性和发电机组的定向运维投资。
管理层重申了到2030年调整后每股收益实现6%至8%+的长期增长目标(以最初2026年指引中值每股4.24美元为基准计算)。公司预计2027年调整后每股收益将增长6%至8%,2028年至2030年年均增长率将超过8%。
基于预计约12%的费率基数复合年增长率(CAGR),管理层预测2028至2030年间每股收益年均增长约9.5%。该预测仅包含迄今已签署的供电服务协议。
公司公布的五年期资本计划为216亿美元。管理层表示,其2026年综合资源规划(IRP)增加了约10亿美元的增量投资,使截至2030年的预估资本支出达到225亿美元。该计划未包含潜在的1.4吉瓦Digital Realty扩建项目或附带条件的140兆瓦扩建项目。
Evergy预计2026年至2028年的运营现金流对债务比率(FFO/Debt)为14%至15%,并在2029年和2030年进一步改善。公司已通过场内增发(ATM)计划筹集了约7亿美元普通股,而此前预计到2029年每年的平均资金需求约为7亿至9亿美元。
风险及关注领域
- 1.4吉瓦的Digital Realty扩建项目仍取决于最终供电服务协议的达成、当地审批以及Evergy增强型堪萨斯州LLPS电价提案的监管进展。
- 另一项独立的140兆瓦扩建项目取决于预计于2026年底完成的输电研究结果。
- 大负荷需求的增长需要庞大的发电和输电投资。管理层预计,Digital Realty扩建项目的主体部分及相关资金需求将在2030年代出现。
- 拟议的堪萨斯州客户承受能力提升计划尚需监管部门批准。Evergy预计将在2027年年中收到裁决令,但审理程序时间表尚未最终敲定。
- 密苏里州的费率审裁案及发电审议程序仍受制于公用事业委员会的裁决、和解进程及证据听证会。
- 天气仍然是收益波动的来源之一,但管理层预计,随着高负荷率数据中心客户占比的提高,未来受天气影响的敏感度在百分比上将逐步降低。
分析师问答环节亮点
分析师重点关注了Digital Realty扩建项目的资金需求和推进时间表。管理层表示,该项目的负荷攀升可能始于2029年,在2030年加速,并持续至2033年。Evergy预计将拥有绝大部分所需发电资源的所有权,指示性资本需求约为40亿美元。
管理层阐述了以高效天然气机组、太阳能和电池储能为核心的发电组合,并强调了可调度资源的重要性。首席财务官布赖恩·巴克勒(Bryan Buckler)给出了一个经验法则,即每1吉瓦的客户需求对应约30亿美元资本支出,并表示该规模可为费率基数增长带来约200个基点的提振。
在监管保障机制方面,管理层表示,增强型LLPS框架将寻求让客户对新增发电设施承担更高比例的投入、争取潜在的预付款,并建立针对在建工程(CWIP)的应对机制。这些条款旨在保护现有客户,并提高项目建设期间的融资效率。
关于堪萨斯州的政治和政策变动,管理层表示对大负荷项目储备的抗风险能力依然充满信心。管理层强调了州政府分治格局的延续、堪萨斯州与密苏里州之间平衡的项目储备,以及项目机会主要集中在现有或相邻客户站点的优势。
管理层将西南电力联营体(SPP)潜在的输电投资定性为长期上行空间,并未计入当前的资本计划中。具体时间安排、竞标架构及最终项目评选仍未敲定,且大部分机会很可能会延续到2030年代。
财报电话会议完整实录
完整财报电话会议逐字稿
管理层陈述
Operator
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q3 2026 Evergy, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Peter Flynn, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Insurance. Please go ahead.
Peter Flynn
Thank you, Kelly, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Evergy's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. We posted a presentation on the Investor Relations page of our website that will be referenced by our speakers. As noted on Slide 2, today's discussion will include forward-looking statements that are accurate only as of the date of today's webcast. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, which are set forth in our earnings release, the slide presentation and our other SEC filings. Management will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations to the applicable GAAP measures are included in today's earnings release and slide presentation, both of which are available on the Investor Relations page of our website.
Joining us on today's call are David Campbell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Bryan Buckler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. David will cover third quarter highlights, our economic development progress and our regulatory agenda. Bryan will review third quarter financial results, retail sales trends and our 2026 and long-term financial outlook. Other members of management are with us and will be available during the Q&A portion of the call. I will now turn the call over to David.
David Campbell
Thanks, Pete, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Slide 5. This morning, we reported third quarter adjusted earnings of $2.58 per share compared to $2.03 per share a year ago. The year-over-year increase was driven primarily by warmer weather, continued load growth, revenue from large customers and recovery of regulated investments, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance and depreciation expense. Year-to-date adjusted earnings were $4.15 per share compared to $3.41 per share a year ago. Brian will discuss the financial drivers in more detail in his remarks.
During the quarter, we worked closely with two of our large customers to refine their anticipated load profiles and update their electric service agreements. As a result, we are announcing three amendments that we expect will increase peak load under those agreements by approximately 250 megawatts, adding incremental large load of the 2027 to 2030 period and beyond. Additionally, we signed a letter of intent with Digital Realty for 1.4 gigawatt expansion project which I'll discuss in more detail on Slide 7. These agreements demonstrate the strength of our customer relationships and continued large customer interest in locating and expanding in our Kansas and Missouri communities.
Operation results have been strong this year with safety, reliability and generation availability trending favorably to Target. Our generation team performed well through a demanding summer, maintaining reliable operations through hot weather and record peak demand for both Evergy and the Southwest Power Pool. Their execution helped ensure that we reliably serve our customers during the most strenuous tests of our fleet and the grid. Given strong year-to-date results, driven by solid operational performance and warmer-than-normal weather, we expect full year results to exceed the top end of our annual guidance range. We are increasing our 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $4.35 to $4.50 per share, up from $4.14 to $4.34 per share.
We're also reaffirming our long-term adjusted EPS growth target of 6% to 8% plus through 2030, measured from the original 2026 guidance midpoint of $4.24. We continue to expect annual adjusted EPS growth to exceed 8% beginning in 2028 and through 2030. Finally, I'm pleased to announce a 4% increase in our quarterly dividend, bringing the annualized dividend to $2.89 per share. This is in line with last year's increase and consistent with our objective moving toward a payout ratio of 50% to 60% over time. Turning to Slide 6, we highlight the major gains in regional rate competitiveness Evergy has achieved over the past 9 years. This success since the merger that created Evergy directly supports the growth opportunities we're discussing today.
Since 2017, our rate trajectory has remained well below regional peers and far below inflation. The cumulative change in Evergy's all-in rates over that time is approximately 7% compared to our regional peer average of 25% and overall inflation of 33%. Holding electric rate increases to a 0.7% annual rate reflects the scale benefits and cost savings resulting from the merger, promises we made and promises we kept. Our continuous focus on affordability and cost discipline is critical to ensuring all of our customers benefit from a new era of economic development and infrastructure investment. Our commitment is further underpinned by the large load power service tariff or LPS.
Above all, the LLPS protects existing customers by ensuring large customers pay the full costs associated with serving them and their fair share of incremental system costs, all while delivering affordability benefits back to our other retail customers and providing for strong commission oversight. To that end, we recently made a filing to augment our approach in Kansas with the customer affordability enhancement plan, a new vintage of tariffs designed to incorporate the strong guardrails already in place, while generating incremental affordability benefits for our customers. I'll discuss this filing in more detail shortly. We look forward to advancing our affordability objectives and working with Governor like Holscher, who we know from our service to Kansas as a collaborative legislator at the State Senate.
We'd also like to thank Governor Kelly for her leadership throughout her two terms. In our Missouri service territory, we are equally focused on ensuring protections and driving benefits for our customers and communities as we advance our robust Missouri pipeline in tandem with the economic development and growth agenda of Governor Kehoe and state leaders. We understand that new large customers aren't a good fit in every community, and our strategy remains prioritizing large customer projects in areas that are well suited for these developments and backed by local permits and local support.
Turning to Slide 7. Execution of our large customer strategy continues to deliver tangible progress for energy customers and the communities we serve. The amendments we announced today at approximately 110 megawatts of make rental peak load across 2 existing large load SAs. As a result, the 5 executed ESAs now represent approximately 2.6 gigawatts of steady-state peak load, and together with non LPS large customers, we expect these projects to require approximately 3.1 gigawatts of peak load over time. Additionally, we executed a third agreement for 140-megawatt expansion of an existing project. The amendment is contingent on the results of a transmission study expected by the end of this year. We're also pleased to sign a letter of intent with Digital Realty for a 1.4 gigawatt expansion at a site adjacent to their 600-megawatt project with assigned ESA as announced on our Q1 earnings call.
Together, these projects represent 2 gigawatts of load with Digital Realty. This LOI demonstrates alignment on commercial terms, and a shared interest in investing in Kansas to deliver affordability benefits to our customers and enable economic growth in the local economy, part of a 9,000-acre industrial site, formerly a large U.S. Army ammunition plant that has since been remediated, that is well suited for this type of development. We anticipate executing an ESA in the first half of next year. Each of our 5 ESAs operates under a large load power service tariff for LPS which includes premium demand rates, binding, minimum bills and meaningful credit and collateral protections.
This framework is designed to ensure that large customers pay their direct costs and a fair share of existing and new system costs. while helping spread fixed costs across our broader base for the benefit of existing customers. We are very encouraged by the momentum across our pipeline and are advancing multiple expansion opportunities with current customers and several projects with prospective new customers. Over the next 12 to 18 months, we see the potential for a steady cadence of pipeline conversions to announce ESAs. These agreements would further establish Kansas, Missouri as premier destinations for infrastructure investment and contributed significantly to economic growth and long-term prosperity across our region.
Slide 8 summarizes the progress we've made in converting our large customer pipeline and signed agreements and provides an update on activity further down the queue. Starting the top row, the now 3.1 gigawatts of Tier 1 customers with active operations or binding ESAs, enables a transformative growth opportunity for Evergy and the communities we serve, supporting our expected 7% to 8% annual retail load growth through 2030. This total consists of projects already in operation, progressing towards a steady state of 1.4 gigawatts and as well as 1.7 gigawatts of additional projects that have executed ESAs, all of which require minimum monthly bill provisions, expanding 15 to 17 years, whether or not the capacity is full even.
Regionally, these will deliver significant benefits, including supporting a leading-edge economy, creating jobs and significantly expanding the local tax base, enabling us to spread system costs over a broader loan profile to maintain affordability for all customers. In the next category, we highlight approximately 2.0 to 2.5 gigawatts of Tier 1 expansion opportunities that are at or adjacent to our existing customer sites. This category includes the potential 1.4 gigawatt expansion with Digital Realty that I described earlier. Agreements related to these opportunities will require amending load ramps in existing SAs or new assets. In tandem, we are working on the transmission and generation solutions to enable them.
And to be clear, our 5-year financial plan does not yet incorporate any impact from these potential expansion projects, including the 1.4 gigawatt Digital Realty expansion, and the 140-megawatt contingent dirt ESA amendment described today, all of which would create additional growth into the 2030s. Our Tier 2 category includes approximately 1 to 2 gigawatts of advanced discussions with new customers. These projects have land or land rights, signed letters of agreement and we are actively reviewing transmission and generation capacity solutions. The opportunity from these customers is primarily beyond 2030. All of the projects in our expansion opportunities in advanced discussions categories made meaningful progress in recent months. We look forward to converting a large portion of these prospective customer initiatives in the ESAs in the quarters ahead.
The remaining pipeline totaling well over 10 additional gigawatts highlights robust activity and a sustained interest in our region. Serving this load will require working collaboratively to identify creative solutions with our customers who stand ready to move forward as capacity opens, allowing us to prioritize the best fit projects as the Q evolves. And before I move on to the next topic, I will summarize by saying that we continue to have a high level of confidence in achieving a total of 5 to 7 gigawatts of large low customer agreements, which will drive significant affordability benefits for our existing customers and exceptional growth for the company well into the 2030s.
Moving to Slide 9, we are pleased to reach a partial revenue requirement settlement in our Missouri Metro rate review in October. Select items remain open for commission evaluation outside of the partial revenue settlement with staff, including return on capital. If the settlement is approved and if the midpoint of staff testimony, our return on capital is used 7% return on equity with a 52% equity ratio. We expect the revenue increase would equal approximately $118 million before the impact of large load. In addition, we filed a partial stipulation agreement related to the LLPS tariff. If approved, the settlement would deliver approximately $60 million of net benefits from new large customer revenues, resulting in a total net revenue increase of approximately $58 million.
Relative to our last rate case in Missouri Metro, the 2022 rate review, this increase would represent a 1.5% annualized impact. Relative to the end of 2017, the annualized impact is just 0.7%, incredible story for our customers when compared to the rate trajectory of other Midwest utilities and the cumulative impact of inflation in the U.S. economy over the same time period. Missouri Metro was the first rate case that we have advanced with LLPS customers, delivering $6 million annually to the benefit of reducing residential customer and industrial customers. serves as an early and powerful example of how a large customer strategy can deliver meaningful affordability benefits to all. In addition, the agreement provides for an earnings sharing mechanism.
In the event of large load revenues drive improvements in realized returns, earnings above the specified level would be shared 65-35 between customers and shareholders with customers receiving 65%. We believe these settlements provide a constructive path forward for customers and the company. We expect a commission order in December with new rates in January 2027. On Slide 10, I'll provide a brief update on our regulatory priorities in Kansas and Missouri. In Kansas, our natural gas, solar and battery storage predetermination proceeding is underway with an order expected by April 2027. These new resources are consistent with our all-of-the-above approach to meeting growing customer demand while maintaining reliability and affordability. Staff testimony is due January 6, followed by a settlement conference on February 4.
On October 29, we requested approval of our LLPS customer affordability enhancement plan in Kansas. Since the approval of the LPS tariff in November 2025. The marketplace for large load and new generation projects has continued to evolve. The enhancement plan is a proactive approach to build on the strong foundation of the LLPS tariff and add new tools. including a vintage cost rider to accommodate higher cost of new generation resources as well as nonrefundable advance payments. In tandem, these mechanisms would increase the financial contribution from new large load customers towards the investments needed to serve them. We believe these enhancements will generate additional affordability benefits for existing customers while further strengthening the financial framework supporting our large load growth strategy all while ensuring transparency and strong oversight from the Kansas Corporation Commission and other stakeholders.
While a procedural schedule has not yet been approved, we anticipate an order by midyear 2027. Separately, we filed a motion seeking clarification under our existing LLPS tariff that would allow voluntary customer advance payments prior to energization, a similar feature to the one filed as part of our customer affordability enhancement plan. We filed a settlement on October 30, which, if approved, would apply these conditions to future customers taking service under the existing LLPS vintage. We anticipate a commission decision in the coming months. Moving to Missouri. We filed a rate review from Missouri West on November 3. This case is primarily driven by new generation investments for which we've received CCN approvals as well as beneficial grid modernization projects that improved reliability for our customers.
As we've discussed in the past, Missouri West is our smallest utility, with some of the lowest rates in the region and in the country, reflecting in part the need for significant infrastructure investment including new dispatchable generation to reduce reliance on market energy. These investments will enhance reliability while supporting economic development and low growth. Importantly, our request also reflects approximately $61 million of revenue offset from largely customers, demonstrating how the benefits of low growth can accrue to existing customers in this jurisdiction similar to Missouri Metro. Longer term, as these benefits continue to grow as these customers ramp up these new large customers.
We remain confident in our ability to manage residential rate increases toward inflation while delivering the infrastructure needed to support reliability economic development and continued low growth. We look forward to working constructively with the Missouri Public Service Commission and stakeholders throughout the process to achieve a balanced outcome that supports much-needed investment in Missouri West while maintaining competitive rates and delivering long-term benefits for customers. Similar to Kansas, we also continue to make progress with our request for generation investments for Missouri customers. Our CCN request includes a new natural gas plant solar farm and battery storage facility. A settlement conference is scheduled for January 14 and evidentiary hearings on February 24.
And lastly, we were able to reach a nonunanimous stipulation and agreement for our CCN request for a second combustion turbine at Mullen Creek, and we anticipate a commission order by January. These proceedings represent important steps in advancing the generation of investments needed to support reliability and capacity needs for our growing customer base. I'll conclude on Slide 11 with the core tenets of our strategy: affordability, reliability and sustainability. Affordability remains central to our decision-making. Our capital investment plan is elevated relative to historical levels, but so too is the low growth supporting it. Large customers pay premium rates and fund the direct costs required to serve them while their additional usage spread system cost over a larger base.
That is the value of our large load growth strategy, investing meaningfully in the system while leveraging incremental demand from new large customers paying premium rates. And reliability is equally fundamental. We are investing in grid modernization, resiliency and new generation capacity while maintaining strong operating performance across our transmission, distribution and generation fleets. Our teams remain focused on safety, customer service and dependable execution as we enter a period of significant construction and growth. And with respect to sustainability, we are inventing a cost effective, all of the above generation portfolio. Our planned investments in an efficient natural gas generation, solar resources and battery storage are designed to meet growing demand, preserve reliability and support the long-term prosperity of Kansas and Missouri.
We have positive momentum, a clear strategy and a motivated and aligned team. We are well positioned to convert unprecedented customer demand into durable long-term growth and meaningful affordability and economic development benefits for our customers and communities. I will now turn the call over to Bryan.
W. Buckler
Thank you, David. Thank you, Pete, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Slide 13 with a review of our third quarter results. For the third quarter of 2026, Evergy delivered adjusted earnings of $610 million or $2.58 per share compared to adjusted earnings of $475 million or $2.03 per share in the third quarter of 2025. As shown on the slide from left to right, the year-over-year drivers were as follows: [indiscernible] demand and large customer revenues contributed $0.46 per share. Cooling degree days were 31% higher than the third quarter of 2025 and 26% above normal. This category also benefited from weather-normalized demand growth of 4.5% and increased large customer revenues from data center projects currently operating.
Next, return on and recovery of regulated investments was driven by new retail rates in our Kansas Central jurisdiction and FERC regulated investments, which in total contributed $0.17 of EPS. The Offsetting these favorable drivers was the combination of higher O&M and increased depreciation and interest expense net of AFUDC related to our capital infrastructure investments, which drove a $0.15 decrease in EPS. And finally, other items increased earnings per share by $0.07. As David noted earlier, we've generated strong financial results through the third quarter and are raising our full year 2026 adjusted EPS guidance range to $4.35 to $4.50 per share from our original guidance range of $4.14 to $4.34 per share. Our updated guidance range includes an expectation to make targeted O&M reliability investments in our distribution grid and generation fleet during the fourth quarter.
Turning to Slide 14, I'll provide more detail on retail sales trends. Weather-normalized retail demand was strong with 4.5% growth in the third quarter, that level of growth is worth highlighting. A 4.5% increase in weather normalized electricity usage is well above what we've experienced in recent years and provides evidence of the step change in demand growth underway across our service territory. We believe this marks the beginning of a period of transformational growth, which we expect will accelerate, especially beginning in 2028 and create meaningful benefits for our customers, our communities and our company in the years ahead. The weather normalized results in Q3 include residential demand, which increased 0.8%, commercial demand, which increased 8.7% and industrial demand, which increased 3%.
Commercial growth reflects increased data center customer usage, while industrial results were driven primarily by Panasonic's continued ramp of operations. On a year-to-date basis through September 30, when the normalized retail demand is up 3.7% and tracking in line with our expectations for the full year of 3% to 4%. At a macro level, the robust customer demand in our service areas is supported by a solid labor market as Missouri, Kansas and the Kansas City metropolitan area unemployment rates remained below the national average. Our attractive service territories also continue to benefit from population growth and in-migration contributing to continued growth in residential customer counts. And few regions in the United States are as well positioned to benefit from the accelerating investment cycle in power infrastructure and AI-driven data centers as the Kansas City metro area including the cities of Overland Park, Kansas; Lenexa, Kansas; and Kansas City, Missouri as well as many other towns throughout Kansas and Western Missouri. The region's deep concentration of EPC firms and highly skilled engineering talent creates a competitive advantage that should drive sustained economic development, employment growth, increased electricity demand across both Kansas and Missouri for years to come.
Moving to Slide 15. We highlight our updated large load demand growth profile. The 5 executed LLPS ESAs, together with non-LLPS customers are expected to support 3.1 gigawatts of peacode over time. including today's binding ESA agreements that added 110 megawatts of peak and increased load across each year 2027 through 2030. In total, aggregate large customer demand is expected to build from approximately 350 to 400 megawatts today to approximately 2,250 megawatts in 2030, further expanding to 3,100 megawatts post 2030 at its peak. As a reminder, Digital Realty's 1.4 gigawatt expansion project and the aforementioned 140-megawatt expansion agreement are not reflected in these numbers, and therefore, would represent upside to this forecast potentially as early as 2029 and 2030.
This chart illustrates a powerful period of growth anchored by long-term contracts and clear parameters on monthly billings, providing significant visibility into our earnings growth and cash flow streams for the ESA LLPS contract terms that are generally spanning 16 to 17 years. In addition, we continue to make strong progress with several other large customers across multiple industries, and we remain very confident in the pipeline and our ability to continue converting these opportunities into executed ESAs for the next several quarters. The associated load and capacity from these potential incremental ESAs would represent further upside to load growth over the long term, and importantly, has the potential to extend our exceptional oil growth well into the 2030s.
As David described, we will continue working in a measured and disciplined manner through our substantial pipeline of prospective customers to build on the success we have achieved to date. Let's close on Slide 16 by summarizing our long-term growth outlook. First, based on signed ESAs and announced large customers that we expect will ultimately reach a steady state of 3.1 gigawatts, we forecast retail demand to grow approximately 7% to 8% annually through 2030. Additionally, ESAs would extend this growth profile with the largest impact expected in the 2030s. Secondly, our $21.6 billion capital plan supports strong foundational earnings growth. In fact, our 2026 IRP preferred plants provide approximately $1 billion of incremental investment taking our estimate of 5-year CapEx through 2030 to $22.5 billion, increasing -- which increases our projected rate base CAGR through 2030 from 11.5% to approximately 12%.
Additional large mode ESAs would provide further investment upside, and we'll update our capital plan on our fourth call in February. Regarding the Digital Realty expansion project, we anticipate owning the vast majority of the generation resources needed to serve their load. For this project alone, we anticipate capital investments could be in the neighborhood of $4 billion. To fund our investment plan, we will use -- we will utilize our expected strong cash flow from operations and reinvested earnings, along with a prudent mix of debt and equity financing to support our strong investment-grade credit rating and FFO to debt that we currently project to be in the range of 14% to 15% from 2026 to 2028, continuing to strengthen in 2029 and 2030.
On the equity front, we have made solid progress utilizing our ATM program with approximately $700 million of common equity price as compared to our forecasted average of approximately $700 million to $900 million annually through 2029. We have used our ATM program throughout this year to meet all our equity needs. Similarly, as we think about the rest of this year, we believe that our remaining needs will be addressable through issuances under our existing or any potential replacement ATM program.
Turning to our EPS outlook. We are reaffirming our long-term adjusted EPS growth target through 2030, up 6% to 8% plus measured from the original 2026 midpoint of $4.24 per share. For 2027, we are reaffirming our expectation to grow earnings per share in the 6% to 8% range. And we continue to expect adjusted EPS growth to exceed 8% annually beginning in 2028 and through 2030. As we have discussed on prior calls, we continue to forecast an approximate 250 basis point delta between rate base growth and EPS growth in 2028 and through 2030 and compared against an approximate 12% rate base CAGR discussed earlier. Driving on average 9.5% EPS growth annually in those 3 years. As a reminder, our financial forecast only incorporates the ESAs we have signed today with further upside to and/or extension of our exceptional growth well into 2030s, if additional ESAs of significance are signed in the future.
In summary, continued execution of our large customer strategy is further strengthening our financial outlook, supporting long-term growth and delivering meaningful affordability benefits for our customers. Lastly, with respect to the current year EPS outlook, we are raising our 2026 adjusted EPS guidance range to $4.35 to $4.50 per share compared to our prior range of $4.14 to $4.34 per share primarily due to favorable weather in the third quarter. I'd like to join David in thanking all of our employees for the strong operational and financial results year-to-date and most importantly, for working safely and keeping our customer rates as some of the lowest in the nation. And with that, we will open the call for your questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Richard Sunderland of Truist Securities.
分析师问答
Unknown Analyst
Good morning. Thanks for the time today. I wanted to start with that DLR update, the $4 billion CapEx potential for that project, could you speak to how much that could fall in the next 5-year period and what impact that may have on the kind of 12% upside rate base growth you quantified in the script there.
David Campbell
We won't go into those details today, but I will emphasize that this is a site where DLR has shown strong interest. You've heard them comment on it really for the past several months. It's at a great location for this kind of development. It's the old sunflower U.S. Army Ammunition Plant. It's over 9,000 acres, which is almost 60% the size of the island of Manhattan. So it's an old ammunition plan that's been remediated. It's well suited for industrial uses now, but really for that kind of purpose. So we're thrilled the DLRs made their big investment in that territory. And the LOI that we've signed reflects alignment on commercial terms, contemplates that we need to make sure they get any remaining local approvals and is aligned with our enhanced tariffs that we're seeking approval for. So we expect to sign an ESA in the first half of 2027.
The time line for the bulk of that is really into the 2030s. But we'll really give details about the specifics once we get that signed. But we're very excited about that opportunity sufficiently so that we are comfortable announcing on today's call. and as well as we anticipate that we would be providing the capacity to serve, which, as Bryan described, as in and of itself in the range of $4 billion of capital. Now typically, that capital trends along with when the ramp rate will occur and you need to have it in place little bit in advance. And again, the bulk of this will probably be in 2030 and beyond when it really hits its ramp. But there'll be meaningful capital that will be associated with this and under a structure with enhanced provisions on the LPS, all reflecting really our twin objectives, making sure that we've got a tariff where the large customers are paying their direct costs. And their share of any incremental system costs so that there are real benefits driven to our existing customers and making sure it's that at sites that really makes sense for this kind of activity. So again, we have more details when we sign the ESA and give a broader update. We're really excited about this partnership and opportunity.
Unknown Analyst
So that's a helpful overview, and maybe I'll follow up on that last point around the enhanced LLPS. Can you speak a little bit more to kind of the process out of that filing is -- is it something you could see settled on a more expedited basis than kind of a full procedural schedule contemplate? And I guess, if settled, could that also expedite finalizing the DLR USA.
David Campbell
It's a great question. I do think it is a proceeding that can move under a more accelerated schedule, certainly than relative to a rate case. But it is a proceeding where you want to make sure you get full input from stakeholders full commission oversight. You'll recall we went through the process with the original large load power service tariff because we wanted to make sure we had something that had full input and oversight and that we've signed that first wave of VSAs after we got that LLPS finalized. And that agreement in Kansas, I'll remind you, was a unanimous settlement. So the residential representative curb representative of the large industrial customers, existing customers, staff, all the stakeholders were participants in that settlement, which ultimately was approved by the commission. So we see the value of going through the process.
I do think that we will -- we do expect it to resolve in the first half of the year. we're well aligned with DLR and what they're seeking to approve the investment they've made in the land and what they're seeking to achieve. So we like this approach because it makes sure that we're delivering on that protections for existing customers that actually end up delivering benefits for customers and having a site that everyone's alone. So we expect those to move in tandem with ESA in the first half of the year.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Nicholas Campanella of Barclays.
Nicholas Campanella
So, I just wanted to ask just with the new leadership in the state of Kansas, obviously, there's been different views on large load customers through elections broadly. But you also have many opportunities that are in the Tier 1 bucket that are just expansions of current sites that I believe are already permitted or maybe ready to go. Can you just talk to how resilient the pipeline is if there is a change in policy understanding that there is real economic development and affordability benefits to these customers. Can you talk to that at all?
David Campbell
You bet, Nick. Great question, and thank you. So I'll first note that we look forward to working with government Holscher in Kansas. We know her from her service in the Canada Senate, where she has a collaborative legislator and supportive generally of critical infrastructure serve Kansas. I'll note that there weren't really any major state-wide elections in Missouri. So Governor Kehoe, Key state leaders are still in place there. what I'll remind folks of about Kansas, big change with respect to electing a Democratic U.S. senator. That hasn't happened for over 90 years. But in the state elections in Kansas, unlike some of the other states where there's a lot of news, what the result of those state elections is actually a continuation of the status quo.
Outgoing Governor Kelly is a 2-term Democratic governor. We worked collaboratively with her throughout her 8 years and thank you for her service to the state. Throughout that time, there has been a Republican majority Kansas Senate and a Republican majority Kansas House, and that's actually the status quo that will continue after this week's election. So a Democratic governor and a Republican majority Senate and Republican majority house. And with that split between the branches of the government, we worked effectively throughout that time, including passage of some very important legislation supporting infrastructure development and economic development in recent years.
So overall, we continue to have high confidence in achieving 5 to 7 gigawatts of large load customer agreements. So capitalizing on the pipeline that we have. as you noted, a big chunk of that are expansion in existing sites, and it's a pipeline that's balanced across both states. Once you take account of the DLR letter of intent that we signed today, the majority of the expansion opportunities and advanced discussions in Tier 1 and 2 are actually on the Missouri side. But as you noted, what I'd emphasize is that our approach will continue to take in both states is one that really focuses on making sure that we have a tariff in place that has large oil customers paying directly for what they the costs we need to incur and making sure that they're paying their share of incremental system costs so that it's really delivering benefits for existing customers, why we filed for the enhanced tariffs.
And we're also really focused on sites that work well for local communities and the sunflower site for DLRs LOI is a great example of that. It's a that really is only going to be well suited for industrial applications like this 1 in a massive acreage so you can have it in the right location. So we feel good about our pipeline, the benefits that we'll deliver as we look across our two states. And as you noted, in particular, as we look at a lot of these are expansions and a robust pipeline across both Missouri and Kansas.
Nicholas Campanella
That's great. I really appreciate it. And then thanks for the commentary on the $4 billion for DLR, just as we think about additional opportunities maybe outside of generation, SPP and the new ITP portfolios for '27 have been getting previewed. And obviously, those are going to get whittled down. But could you just give any sense of how much capital would be at play there? And I know a lot of this would maybe 2030. But is there a way to kind of put a framework around what the available opportunity set is for the next ITP?
David Campbell
It's probably early days to specify what the exact opportunity is other than to note that as you cited, it's a very robust overall program, the integrated transition plan that released about $20 billion, about $10 million of that involving projects that span across our service territory. Now there are going to be some important decisions to be made that haven't yet been made, how much of those will be competitively bid. How much will be noticed precede projects given a short-term reliability time line, that will have implications. And also what the ultimate time line is to build. A big chunk of those are 765 lines. which are certainly more efficient relative to the overall cost and land usage if you're going to have to build two 345s. But how much precedent for building those yet, certainly across our service territory.
So there's still some work to do. I would describe it as long-term upside. It's not in our current capital plan. And as we described, there are some significant drivers of additional upside in the capital plan that we see. So there's potential opportunity into the 2030s. I've been around long distance and long-term transmission build earlier in my career. So I shared with you it's likely into the 2030s. So I view it as something that could be a driver in not only incremental ESAs, carries in the decade. That's also when we get into the retirement phase for some of our older coal units. We have a number of wind and ruble PPAs will roll off in the time frame. I expect electrification will be a driver. And this transmission is another piece. It's a part of the overall long-term tailwind that outside.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Steve D'Ambrisi from RBC Capital Markets.
Stephen D’Ambrisi
Just to add a quick one or maybe two. On the $4 billion of upside capital to serve potentially this 1.4 gigawatts of Digital Realty LOI. Can you talk a little bit about the resource mix that you think is appropriate to serve that? And then I just have a follow-up.
David Campbell
Sure. I think if you -- you'll see in our slide a listing of the things that are included in our most recent integrated resource plan. Now those are our resources that are serving the agreements that we've already signed. But the mix that you'll see, I think, is pretty representative of what we'd look for going forward. there's a need for dispatchable baseload generation. So highly efficient natural gas resources that we've been committed to investing in so far and then receive approval, we expect to continue to be an important part of the mix.
But along with that, solar and storage, it's possible that over time, some of the large customers will bring resources in the system. But most of the customers with whom we're having discussions now are looking for us to provide the capacity in a system resource. So I think that mix of renewables and natural gas with a little bit of a balance towards dispatchable generation to make sure that we can meet the capacity energy needs to large customers. I expect you'll see that as pretty representative going forward as well.
W. Buckler
Yes. And Steve, just to add to that. If you think about the ramp rate for Digital Realty, it probably started in 2029, really kicks in, in earnest in 2030 and then ramps up each year thereafter through 2033. So as David mentioned, you're looking at something that looks like solar and battery storage by 2030, 2031. So some of that capital would come in service within our new 5-year plan that will roll out February or whenever we update the 5-year plan for digital really could be a few months after February. But that's a mix that all -- you'll see once we finalize that ESA come into a 5-year view. And we kind of just have a rule of thumb. When you think about a 1 gig customer and whether it's Digerati or others, we could have several of those type projects going forward.
The rough math on that is about $3,000 at KW. That's kind of going rate for a combined cycle today, which continues to go up. But think about it, we use about a $3 billion per CapEx per gigawatt of customer, and we expect to have multiple of those over time and are adding up to multiple over time and roll thumb to our rate base CAGR, that would roughly equate to about 200 basis point increase to rate base growth.
Stephen D’Ambrisi
Very helpful. And Bryan, you kind of -- maybe I bury the lead or you kind of answered my next question, but with the rest of the expansion opportunities bucket, if Digital Realty is $1.4 million and then you've got the 140 megawatts. I mean we've been tracking, obviously, a very large opportunity in Missouri that we think is in that bucket. Just can you talk a little bit about -- I guess, can you talk a little bit about what is the rest of that to 2.5 expansion opportunities bucket look like? And then what are the gating items to converting that into ESAs because it does seem like there's a significant amount of activity at some of these sites.
W. Buckler
Yes. Steve, I think it's similar to what David described around digitally. The -- those -- that pipeline is real. They have real sites. They still need to get through their full suite of local permitting for the larger expansion opportunities or new projects, you're going to see those fall under an enhanced type of LLPS, similar to the 1 that we've filed in Kansas and when that David described, that will make sure they're paying their full fair share. It will cover aspects such as CWIP and rates, which will provide, again, additional affordability benefits for customers as well as allow for advanced payments of future revenue streams.
So it's a really broad type of LLPS framework as we move into some of these larger loads for the next wave of customers. We feel great about them across both states. The pipeline, as David mentioned, is deep in both states. And so if we ever -- so I kind of leave it at that, Steve. It's just one that we continue to have a very high level of confidence in achieving the total 5 to 7 gigawatt opportunity, and we'll continue to finance it in a balanced way like we have in the past.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Shar Pourreza of Wells Fargo.
Andrew Kadavy
It's actually Andrew Kanavy on for Shar. So with the large load pipeline additions and some possibility of having some advanced payments. Can you talk about maybe the impact that might have on your equity issuance plans moving forward? And could that also maybe push out some future rate cases?
David Campbell
So I'll ask Bryan to supplement, but you hit on it. I think there are several features of the enhanced LPS that are attractive. One is that it's in effect adding to the LPS structure, given that the cost of new build is rising. We're making adjustments to the LPS to take account of those higher costs and making sure the new customers are paying for that and paying their fair share. And there's also a feature that has advanced payments. That mitigates the financial impact of CWIP, potential financial impact of CWIP during the build-out phase before the compressors reach their full ramp. And as a knock-on effect also helps from an overall cash flow perspective, because you're making sure that you're receiving some cash payments as you're going through that build-out phase.
So I think it is, most importantly, a set of enhancements that ensure that we have protections for existing customers and are delivering benefits for existing customers. and we're adjusting to market circumstance that has evolved. But I think it's also a mechanism that can allow for a little bit more efficient overall financing strategy. And as we announced CSAs and potential expansions to capital plans associated with them. Obviously, we'll talk about the net strategy associated with it. I don't know if there's anything you'd add?
W. Buckler
Nothing to add. Andrew, did that answer your question?
Andrew Kadavy
Yes, very helpful. And then we've seen weather be both a headwind and a tailwind for Evergy. With the data center load ramping, does the cooling load that brings online, does that increase EPS sensitivity to weather? Or would the higher baseline kind of reduce that sensitivity?
David Campbell
Well, I think net overall will likely reduce the sensitivity. You're going to have some high -- a significantly higher percentage of high load factor customers whose load levels are going to be more consistent than the current mix, which is still relatively highly weighted as legacy [indiscernible] business. We've got a pretty high mix of residential and commercial. It's more sensitive to weather. So I think as we add the higher load factor customers, they were not immune to the temperature, but their load factors are more driven by the underlying demand for the servers and other equipment that they're running. So we think it will reduce over time.
We'll continue to evaluate as it makes sense in our jurisdictions, whether there are mechanisms to sort of dampen the impact of weather. I've now been at Evergy is my sixth year. And there have been some significant volatility in weather, and that can go to customers' benefits in years like '24 and '25 when it's a milder summer and lower bills. And then when the years like '22 and '26 when it's a hot summer, it just creates a little more volatility. So they're many jurisdictions that have opted for some dampening or smoothing, not something that's been of interest in the past for our regulators, but that may be a conversation to have over time. But to your point, the mix overall will shift in a way that will reduce the overall sensitivity at least on a percentage basis.
Operator
This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it back to David Campbell, Chairman and CEO, for closing remarks.
David Campbell
Great. Thank you, Kelly, and thanks, everyone, for your -- I think the mic would have been on there for someone. Thank you, Kelly, and thanks, everyone, for your participation in today's call. We look forward to seeing you at EEI, and have a great day. We'll wrap up there.
Operator
Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.
本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。









