Neuronetics (STIM) 2026年第三季度财报电话会:利润率扩张与正向EBITDA
Neuronetics公布2026年第三季度财报,总营收同比增长12.5%至4200万美元,毛利率提升至52.2%,调整后EBITDA转正至190万美元。业绩增长主要得益于Greenbrook业务扩张、收入周期改善及AI编码工具的应用。公司维持全年营收指引在1.60亿美元至1.64亿美元不变,并上调毛利率预期。未来将通过调整销售策略、推进电子健康记录整合及为COMP360上市做准备,持续提升盈利能力与现金流。
Neuronetics (NASDAQ: STIM)公布了更为强劲的2026年第三季度盈利表现,主要得益于Greenbrook的增长、收入周期改善以及NeuroStar资本化销售占比提高推升了利润率。该公司维持了全年的营收预期,同时收窄了多项费用和现金流指引区间。
核心要点
- 2026年第三季度营收同比增长12.5%至4200万美元,其中Greenbrook营收增长20.1%成为主要推动力。
- 毛利率从45.9%扩大至52.2%,反映出Greenbrook收入周期管理的改善以及NeuroStar全新市场进入策略的成效。
- 营业利润达到50万美元,而上年同期为亏损730万美元。调整后EBITDA从负470万美元转正至190万美元。
- NeuroStar创下系统销售历史新高。当季销售的设备中,半数以上为资本化或租赁设备,对平均售价和毛利率形成了有力支撑。
- 管理层维持2026年全年营收指引在1.60亿美元至1.64亿美元不变,并将毛利率指引下限上调至49%。
- Greenbrook旗下诊所的使用率低端约为25%,表现最佳的诊所可达75%,这使得产能利用率成为未来提升盈利能力的关键杠杆。
关键财务业绩
| 指标 | 2026年第三季度 | 2025年第三季度 | 变动 / 点评 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 总营收 | 4200万美元 | 3730万美元 | 增长12.5% |
| Greenbrook营收 | 2620万美元 | 未披露 | 增长20.1% |
| NeuroStar营收 | 1580万美元 | 未披露 | 增长1.8% |
| 毛利率 | 52.2% | 45.9% | 提升6.3个百分点 |
| 营业费用 | 2130万美元 | 2440万美元 | 下降12.6% |
| 营业利润(亏损) | 50万美元 | -730万美元 | 改善790万美元 |
| 归属于股东的净亏损 | -170万美元 | -900万美元 | 亏损收窄 |
| 每股亏损 | -0.02美元 | -0.13美元 | 亏损收窄 |
| 调整后EBITDA | 190万美元 | -470万美元 | 改善660万美元 |
| 经营与投资活动现金流 | 80万美元 | -90万美元 | 由负转正 |
| 现金总额 | 2790万美元 | 截至2025年12月31日为3410万美元 | 包含580万美元受限现金 |
业务与经营表现
Greenbrook推动增长与利润率改善
在患者资质审核优化、理赔流程更规范、回款更高效以及SPRAVATO实现两位数增长的支撑下,Greenbrook营收达2620万美元。管理层表示,由于患者可进入维持治疗阶段,SPRAVATO的收入具有相对较强的持续性。
公司已开始部署AI赋能的编码优化工具Skypoint。管理层表示,该工作流程调整使首月回款实现了低两位数的改善,同时使部分后台员工得以分流至其他岗位。尽管部分收益反映了前期回款的集中补收,但大部分收入周期的改善被认为具有持续性。
Neuronetics计划将部分面向消费者的直接广告(DTC)预算转向Greenbrook的一线销售团队。公司计划在现有20人团队的基础上增加8名代表,在不增加整体销售与营销费用的情况下,于2027年第一季度某个时候扩充至28人。管理层预计新销售代表将在2027年年中带来显著贡献。
NeuroStar资本化销售弥补疗程收入下滑
NeuroStar营收增长1.8%至1580万美元。创纪录的系统销量以及资本型设备的强劲两位数增长,被因公司推行拓展后的市场进入策略而导致的疗程收入下滑部分抵消。
管理层预计NeuroStar的收入结构仍将偏向资本化销售,疗程收入将略微走低。不过,一年前已活跃的可比客户的治疗疗程量实现了适度增长。
公司已于8月向美国FDA提交了加速TMS(经颅磁刺激)方案的510(k)申请。此外,公司还与Wave Neuroscience签署了分销协议,将Wave的MeRT系统与NeuroStar进行整合,前提是计划寻求FDA批准将NeuroStar列为适用于Wave创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)适应症的兼容系统。
Neuronetics还将旗下TrakStar诊所管理平台与AdvancedMD进行了对接。该整合计划于2026年第四季度向符合条件的NeuroStar医疗服务提供商开放,旨在减少重复建档,并将治疗数据与排班、临床病历及收入周期工作流程相打通。
推动Greenbrook为COMP360做好准备
Neuronetics继续与Compass Pathways合作,为用于难治性抑郁症的COMP360预期上市做准备。管理层表示,Compass预计将在约两周内完成向FDA的申报,并预计于2027年上半年推出该产品。
Greenbrook预计将采用“中心辐射”(hub-and-spoke)模式切入,而非立即在目前提供SPRAVATO的全部84家诊所全面铺开该疗法。准备工作包括人员培训、对接医疗服务提供商、保险权益核查以及支付方对接准备工作。
管理层业绩指引
| 2026年全年指标 | 最新指引 | 此前指引 |
|---|---|---|
| 营收 | 1.60亿美元-1.64亿美元 | 1.60亿美元-1.64亿美元 |
| 毛利率 | 49%-50% | 48%-50% |
| 营业费用(不含股权激励费用) | 8900万美元-9200万美元 | 9100万美元-9600万美元 |
| 股权激励费用 | 约350万美元 | 约400万美元 |
| 营业费用总额 | 9250万美元-9550万美元 | 9500万美元-1.00亿美元 |
| 经营与投资活动现金流 | -1000万美元至-1200万美元 | -1050万美元至-1450万美元 |
管理层继续以2026年下半年经营与投资活动产生的净现金消耗极低或为零为目标。同时,管理层预计NeuroStar第四季度的收入结构仍将略微偏向资本型设备。
风险与关注点
- 随着资本化及租赁交易在销售结构中的占比提高,NeuroStar的疗程收入预计将略微走低。
- Greenbrook的诊所使用率依然不均衡,在约25%至75%之间不等,且预计新销售代表在2027年年中之前不会产生实质性贡献。
- 管理层预计,随着较易实现的效率红利已被挖掘,未来收入周期的改善幅度将趋于平缓。
- 在报销机制成熟之前,COMP360早期的支付方覆盖可能依赖于个案协议(individual case agreements)。
- NeuroStar加速方案仍处于FDA审查阶段,而计划中的NeuroStar与Wave Neuroscience针对PTSD的整合在上市前仍需获得额外审批。
分析师问答环节亮点
- Greenbrook增长:管理层将增长归因于收入周期改善以及SPRAVATO的增长,而非主要由诊所使用率或业务结构带动。
- NeuroStar设备质量:创纪录的设备销量代表新增系统或治疗椅,而非现有按疗程付费客户的会计核算转换。其中半数以上为资本化或租赁交易。
- 收入周期持续性:管理层表示,大部分改善应会持续,Skypoint加快了回款速度并减少了劳动密集型理赔工作。
- 电子健康记录(EHR)拓展:Neuronetics将在规划更多EHR合作之前,先行评估对接AdvancedMD的采用情况和客户价值。
- TMS治疗灵活性:一项针对逾6400名NeuroStar患者的分析显示,治疗出现间隔(包括长达13天的间隔)的患者在疗效上未见统计学显著差异。管理层认为这有望减轻患者对开始治疗的顾虑。
财报电话会完整实录
完整财报电话会议逐字稿
管理层陈述
Operator
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Neuronetics Reports Third Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Aman Patel with ICR Healthcare. Please go ahead.
Aman Patel
Good morning, and thank you for joining us for the Neuronetics Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Joining me on today's call are the Neuronetics President and Chief Executive Officer, Dan Reuvers; and Chief Financial Officer, Nir Naor.
Before we begin, I would like to caution listeners that certain information discussed by management during this conference call will include forward-looking statements related to our business strategy, financial and revenue guidance and other operational issues and metrics. Actual results can differ materially from the company's business. For a discussion of risks and uncertainties associated with Neuronetics business, I encourage you to review the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's annual report on Form 10-K, which was filed in March and the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2026.
The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the course of this call, except as required by law. During the call, we will also discuss certain information on a non-GAAP basis, including EBITDA. Management believes that non-GAAP financial information taken in conjunction with U.S. GAAP financial measures provides useful information for both management and investors by excluding certain noncash and other expenses that are not indicative of trends in our operating results. Reconciliation between U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP results are presented in the tables accompanying our press release, which can be viewed on our website.
With that, it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Neuronetics' President and Chief Executive Officer, Dan Reuvers.
Daniel Reuvers
Thanks, Aman, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our third quarter 2026 earnings call. I'll first walk you through the quarter, reviewing our results on each side of the business, and then I'll turn it over to Nir to discuss our financial results in greater detail. I'll then come back with how we're thinking about the rest of the year and the setup for 2027 before opening it up for questions.
Turning to the quarter. We continue to execute against the profitability and operating cash goals we outlined earlier in the year, and we made meaningful progress on both fronts. Total revenue for the quarter was approximately $42 million, up over 12% versus the third quarter of last year. The results reflect a record quarter for NeuroStar system sales, driven by a welcome reception from customers toward our expanded go-to-market strategy as well as continued strength within our Greenbrook clinics as we realize ongoing impacts of our revenue cycle management efforts.
Diving deeper into our NeuroStar performance, let me start there. Total worldwide revenue was $15.8 million, up approximately 2% year-over-year. This was primarily driven by our capital equipment business, where we had a record quarter of system sales. We saw strong double-digit year-over-year performance here, and I believe it's being positively impacted by the go-to-market changes we introduced earlier this year. Notably, we believe many of these placements are with customers we would not have been able to compete for with our prior approach, including a recently awarded sole-source agreement with a large national player.
The strength of our capital business was partly offset by sessions revenue being down versus last year, which was expected as we implement our new sales strategy. We continue to expect the overall revenue mix to be weighed more towards NeuroStar Capital versus sessions going forward as we execute on our plan. As such, we expect session revenue to continue to trend slightly downwards. We believe that our go-to-market changes position us well to compete in a broader segment of the market and expect to yield higher overall net growth in 2027 and beyond.
It's also worth reiterating that for customers preferring our treatment session model built around a high-touch partnership with Neuronetics, nothing changes. We believe this sessions model continues to set us apart as we believe we're uniquely equipped to help emerging TMS practices establish a profitable therapy adjunct.
NeuroStar customers perform almost twice as many treatments per chair as the competitive landscape, a velocity differentiator we believe directly reflects the support and affirmation of value we bring. During the quarter, we also had several noteworthy advances that reinforced our commitment to growing the NeuroStar platform. On the regulatory front, in August, we submitted a 510(k) to the FDA for an accelerated TMS protocol and it's currently under review. We expect that condensed protocols can be an advantage for some patients, and this could be another way to expand access to TMS for even more patients.
We also had an important publication in the TMS Journal titled The Impact of Treatment Gaps on the Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder. The paper reflected analysis of over 6,400 patients whose depression was treated with NeuroStar under real-world conditions. It showed that approximately 15% of patients completed their treatment course with no gaps, leaving 85% of patients who missed 1 or more scheduled treatment days. Since missed days can be common, patients and physicians often wonder if a missed treatment day may negatively affect outcomes. The analysis found that there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between patients that experienced a gap in their treatment versus those that didn't. It further concluded that missing treatment for up to 13 days did not reduce effectiveness.
This is an important consideration as patients may otherwise put off initiating treatment based on their availability to commit to an uninterrupted sequence of days. Lastly, we signed a distribution agreement with Wave Neuroscience to integrate its MeRT system with NeuroStar. MeRT uses EEG data to personalize TMS protocols and received FDA clearance in June for treating adults with post-traumatic stress disorder, achieving 68% remission in its pivotal trial.
Prior to launch, we plan to seek FDA clearance to add NeuroStar as a TMS system compatible with Wave Neuroscience's PTSD indication. Approximately 9 million U.S. adults experience PTSD annually with an estimated 4-plus million of those seeking treatment. Thus, this partnership represents a significant opportunity to expand NeuroStar's clinical application. On the operational front, we announced in September what we believe is the first ever integration between a TMS system and an Electronic Health Record, or EHR, connecting our TrakStar practice management platform with AdvancedMD, a cloud-based EHR, practice management and revenue cycle platform serving more than 65,000 practitioners across 13,000 independent practices, including our own Greenbrook clinics.
Delivering TMS means coordinating care across a multi-session course of treatment, along with documentation and clinical notes, while claims and authorizations are often managed in separate systems. This creates duplicate work for practices. With this integration, treatment data flows into the same system where a practice manages its schedule, clinical records and notes and revenue cycle. It will be available in the fourth quarter to NeuroStar providers already using AdvancedMD.
We use AdvancedMD as our EHR at our Greenbrook clinics. So we expect to benefit from this efficiency just like our NeuroStar customers. This inaugural integration further paves the way for us to integrate TrakStar into additional EHRs, extending additional practice efficiencies to NeuroStar customers and prospects alike.
Moving to Greenbrook. Revenue was approximately $26 million, up over 20% year-over-year. Our work on revenue cycle management continued to produce results with better patient qualification, cleaner claims, and more efficient collections, all helping us convert more of each billed dollar to cash. This quarter, we also began deploying Skypoint, an AI-enabled coding optimization tool, which builds on automation technology established earlier this year. This advances the operational discipline we've been building throughout the organization by ensuring insurance claims are submitted quickly and accurately. We are very encouraged by the early results and believe there's still runway ahead for us.
We continue to believe that filling the capacity in our existing clinics remains an important profitability lever. Our focus will continue to be on finding the most efficient ways to serve even more qualified patients that can benefit from our therapies. Two key measures that we monitor closely are relative return on our direct-to-consumer advertising and field sales team effectiveness. We determined, based on what we're seeing to date, that field sales personnel deliver the better return and give us more control over patient acquisition cost and yield. As a result, we're shifting a portion of our direct-to-consumer ad spend towards expanding our Greenbrook field sales team. We expect this to sponsor a bigger sales team without increasing overall sales and marketing expense. We plan to begin this process in the fourth quarter.
We expect the new reps to be fully ramped up and contribute meaningfully by mid-'27. As we execute this strategy, we will update you on our progress. Overall, this quarter, we continued doing what matters most, executing against our new go-to-market strategy for NeuroStar while competing for customers who were previously out of reach, running our Greenbrook clinics more efficiently and delivering on our goals towards profitability and cash generation.
With that, I'll turn it over to Nir to take you through the financials, and then I'll come back with our outlook for the rest of the year. Nir?
Nir Naor
Thank you, Dan, and good morning, everyone. Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are third quarter 2026 versus third quarter 2025. Total revenue in the third quarter was $42 million, an increase of 12.5% compared to $37.3 million in the third quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher Greenbrook revenue. Greenbrook revenue was $26.2 million, a 20.1% increase. These results reflect continued growth of our Greenbrook business and operational gains across our clinics.
NeuroStar revenue was $15.8 million, an increase of 1.8%. As Dan explained, strong capital sales were partially offset by a decline in session revenue as we implement our new go-to-market strategy. Gross margin was 52.2% in the third quarter of 2026 compared to 45.9% in the prior year quarter. The increase was driven by a positive impact of our new go-to-market strategy and improved revenue cycle management within the Greenbrook clinic.
Operating expenses during the quarter were $21.3 million, a decrease of $3.1 million or 12.6% compared to $24.4 million in the third quarter of 2025. This was primarily due to lower sales and marketing expenses, partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses. Income from operations was $0.5 million compared to a loss of $7.3 million in the prior year quarter, an improvement of $7.9 million. Net loss attributable to Neuronetics stockholders was $1.7 million or $0.02 per share as compared to a net loss of $9 million or $0.13 per share in the prior year.
Third quarter adjusted EBITDA was $1.9 million as compared to a loss of $4.7 million in the prior year, an improvement of $6.6 million. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow. As of September 30, total cash was $27.9 million, consisting of $22.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $5.8 million of restricted cash as compared to total cash of $34.1 million as of December 31, 2025. Cash provided by operating and investing in the third quarter was $0.8 million compared to negative cash flow from operating and investing of $0.9 million in the prior year.
Now turning to guidance. For the full year 2026, we expect total revenue between $160 million and $164 million, unchanged from previous guidance. Gross margin between 49% and 50% compared to prior guidance of 48% to 50%. Operating expenses, excluding stock-based compensation of between $89 million and $92 million with estimated stock-based compensation of $3.5 million compared to prior guidance of $91 million to $96 million and stock-based compensation of $4 million.
Operating expenses between $92.5 million and $95.5 million compared to prior guidance of $95 million to $100 million. Cash flow from operating and investing in the range of negative $10 million to negative $12 million compared to prior guidance of negative $10.5 million to negative $14.5 million. We continue to target limited to no net cash utilization from operating and investing in the second half of the year.
In summary, this was a quarter of solid financial progress. We grew revenue, expanded gross margin, reduced operating expenses and delivered positive adjusted EBITDA and positive cash flow from operating and investing. Our goal is to turn this progress into sustained profitability and cash flow generation, and I look forward to building on this momentum into Q4 and next year.
With that, I'll turn it back to Dan for his closing remarks.
Daniel Reuvers
Thank you, Nir. I'd like to take this time to recognize and thank our Neuronetics colleagues for their efforts in the clinics, field, and across the organization. Their effort is what delivers value to our patients and the strong performance we're seeing.
As Nir discussed, we're pleased to have delivered another strong quarter, driven by both our go-to-market strategy in NeuroStar as well as our continued momentum at Greenbrook. At the same time, we're making meaningful progress toward profitability and cash generation and we believe we're well positioned for sustained overall growth in 2027.
In addition to the progress we've been making with NeuroStar, Greenbrook and operationally, we also continued our collaboration with Compass Pathways to prepare for the anticipated commercial launch of their psychedelic therapeutic for treatment-resistant depression, or TRD. Compass recently reported 52-week data from its Phase III COMP-005 trial, showing that an additional dose of COMP360 extended the benefit in TRD out to 1 year, which we believe further supports COMP360's differentiated profile and potential for long-lasting benefit.
Compass has reported that they expect to complete their FDA submission in approximately 2 weeks with the launch expected in the first half of 2027. We continue to believe therapies like this will need exactly the kind of delivery platform that we already operate for SPRAVATO, including a dignified in-office drug administration experience, along with monitoring, REMS programs, trained clinical staff, benefits investigation and prior authorization infrastructure.
Greenbrook's experience, scale, and available capacity position us to be an early leader as we look forward to providing the most comprehensive menu of interventional psychiatry options for patients. Looking to the fourth quarter, we continue to expect NeuroStar revenue mix to be weighted slightly towards NeuroStar capital as our expanded go-to-market and targeting efforts take root. For Greenbrook, we're deliberately rebalancing our sales and marketing spend with the goal of positioning us for sustained growth in 2027. And with that, operator, we're ready to open the line for questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of John Young with Canaccord.
分析师问答
John Young
Congratulations on the quarter. I want to focus on Greenbrook and the performance that you are seeing there. How much of the growth in Q3 was pricing or revenue cycle gains versus just overall patient volume increases? And can you talk about the unused capacity that continues to exist today?
Daniel Reuvers
Sure. Thanks, John, for the questions. First of all, revenue cycle management, I would say, is an area that we've continued to demonstrate really solid progress. So the growth was a combination of revenue cycle management, and we saw growth in SPRAVATO as well. I think we've described the SPRAVATO business as certainly more durable because there's a maintenance phase that patients continue within once they come into network. So it's really a combination between those 2.
I'm really -- I'm pleased with the revenue cycle progress we continue to make as well. I think it really demonstrates that we're positioning ourselves foundationally with just a better run business. From an occupancy standpoint, that continues to be an area of focus. And it's one of the reasons that we're making some of the changes in our go-to-market approach commercially trying to put more of our resources into expanding the sales team and revisiting the utility or efficiency of our direct-to-consumer ad approach.
We've got a pretty big range, John, in occupancy. I'd say it's as low as 25% probably at the bottom and as high as 75% in our highest performers. But clearly, that's a big range, and we want to continue to move that bottom quartile up. So I think the -- some of the changes that we're making, as I said, we expect will certainly have impact as we go into 2027.
John Young
Thanks, Dan. And then just to double-click on SPRAVATO, too. I think last time we checked, you were at 84 sites that you're offering it. Has that changed? And then looking at J&J and their reported sales, I believe SPRAVATO grew about 36% year-over-year. I'm not sure if you're willing to quantify the contribution in a dollar amount that it contributed in Q3. But is that a good way to think about your growth as well, that 36% year-over-year growth?
Daniel Reuvers
Yes. I don't know if we've given that number in SPRAVATO growth. But certainly, as I mentioned, we've seen double-digit growth in SPRAVATO. And again, I think it's a laddered approach as patients come into the network and then continue on a maintenance phase. So the growth that we do see in SPRAVATO, we expect will continue to be quite durable.
Operator
Our next question is from Madison El-Saadi with B. Riley.
Madison Wynne El-Saadi
Congrats on the progress. A couple from us. Maybe on the Compass pilot, have you said how many clinics would be involved in that pilot program? I'm curious how you picked them and what needs to be true before you would roll this out across the network? And Greenbrook ran a SPRAVATO pilot back in 2021. Obviously, that was in the wake of COVID, but just wondering if that's a good proxy. And then a follow-up, if I may, afterwards.
Daniel Reuvers
Yes. Thanks for the question, Madison. We haven't shared how many sites we're going to introduce initially, but I think it's fair to assume that we'll probably initially start with a bit of a hub-and-spoke model. I don't know that we feel obligated to provide it in every one of our 84 SPRAVATO clinics that exists today as much as we want to be in each of the MSAs that we're in. So I think that's probably the key for us.
We expect we will learn a lot with the introduction. And what we're focused on right now are the work streams that are within our control. So things like making sure that we've got training programs and curriculums clearly established for both our caregivers and our sales teams. And I think the next one is taking an extension of that once our sales teams are trained, making sure that we've got a very thoughtful and targeted approach to HCP outreach from our field teams.
And then our whole benefit investigation piece and payer relations team is also attempting to ramp up their readiness. A lot of this in the early days is still going to be hand-to-hand combat. I mean single case agreements initially will likely rule the day until we see some of the coverage components become a bit more mature. But ultimately, we're -- we've got a very dedicated work stream to each of those, and we're downstream with our mitt open and ready to catch.
Madison Wynne El-Saadi
Awesome. And if I may, a second question related to NeuroStar. Sorry if I missed this. But how much of the record system sales was capital and lease conversions of your existing session customers versus new accounts? And then the treatment volume on the installed base grow in 3Q?
Daniel Reuvers
Sure. Yes. First, the question about mix, we do continue to see our mix moving more towards capital and lease. We're not recognizing unit sales if it's an existing customer that just paid off something. So these are new boxes or new chairs and new systems that are going out when we talk about a record number of units.
I think the other thing that we saw was over half of all of our units sold in Q3 were capital or lease units. That was good for ASP. It's also good for gross margin. And I think it's also a reflection that our customers appreciate the choices that we've given them. We're allowing customers to determine where the value they think is. And while the sessions did grow among like customers, so customers that were customers a year ago, modest, but we did see growth on the session side from those customers.
What we're also seeing is that when we start to focus more on larger accounts, multisite accounts, national accounts, enterprise, some of the things that have kind of become our hallmark, which is we can help you with marketing. We can help you build your practice with co-op. We can help you with training, reimbursement assistance, benefits investigation. I mean, bigger systems, they don't need some of those things like the private practice psychiatry offices do. So that's why, again, we've made the choice to expand our aperture on how we go to market, and we've been actually quite pleased on the kind of reception we're getting from each independent type of customer. We think we've got a value proposition for them.
Madison Wynne El-Saadi
Congrats again on the quarter.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Sam Eiber with U.S. Bancorp BTIG.
Sam Eiber
Congrats on a nice quarter here. Maybe I can start on Greenbrook and coming back to the revenue cycle management improvements. I guess I'm curious the durability of some of the progress that you made there and ability to, I guess, keep advancing some of that benefit into 2027. And then I'll have a quick follow-up question.
Daniel Reuvers
Sure. Thanks. Sam, I think I've talked a lot about the value drivers within Greenbrook. And I think foundationally, the first one is continued demonstration of improvement in our revenue cycle management approach. I think that the short answer is I think most of these changes are quite durable.
We talked a little bit about deploying an AI-enabled new partner, Skypoint. There's a lot of components of processing a claim that are largely labor-intensive. We have to pair clinic notes depending on who the payer is, what the requirement is, making sure that we're matching up everything for each individual payer, starting to use some software tools, including some AI optimization is bearing fruit. I can tell you that when we deployed Skypoint, just that change in workflow has led to a low double-digit improvement in the first month of collections. So we don't obviously collect all of our collections in the first month.
There's some that gets -- comes in, in month 2, month 3, month 4. But importantly, the faster we can collect, the better it is for the business, of course. And we saw meaningful progress from some of those changes. It also reduced some of the headcount in the back office which we were able to redirect into some other roles. So I do think that there is both durable impact from our efforts and I think there's continued improvement available to us. But I would also add, we're going to have to keep climbing a little higher on the tree to find the fruit. As we continue to get better, the improvements will become a bit more modest, but I do think that there's more runway ahead for us.
Nir Naor
Build on that, Sam. So yes, as Dan mentioned, the very nice improvements that we have done, some further improvements that we can do just built off of them. And basically, the only thing if you look at our, say, gross margin compared to the prior year, those improvements are, for the most part, durable. The ones that are not are simply some prior period RCM catch-ups. But otherwise, yes, they are durable, and we're building on them.
Sam Eiber
Okay. That's great. Makes sense. And then a quick follow-up on the EHR integrations. I'm curious how much of a selling point and maybe a competitive advantage that is seamlessly integrating the EMR platform. And then I think you hinted at maybe additional integrations coming with maybe some of the bigger platforms. Curious if you're able to put any sort of time line on when that might be?
Daniel Reuvers
Sure. Yes, I think that the AMD-TrakStar integration was an important first step for us. And there's a fairly fragmented EHR network of providers out there. AMD is the larger of a pretty long tail of EHRs. So that's why we selected them. We also selected them in part because that's who we use at Greenbrook. So not only could we benefit from the efficiencies of integrating the EHR with TrakStar, but we can also obviously bring it to our NeuroStar customers.
Our goal is to make sure that we are focused on existing AMD customers that aren't yet NeuroStar customers because we think that we bring another very unique value proposition that's unavailable to our competitors. It's -- there's a lot of work that goes on in managing the documentation within health care, as you know. So charting, all the clinic notes, et cetera, often have to be transcribed, entered into 2 places. This allows our clinician customers to be able to do that just once. It also enriches our own TrakStar data. We've talked a lot about how rich and unique the database that we continue to collect within TrakStar is. This will allow us to start to collect even more information on each of those patient experiences, including was the patient pregnant, what medications were they on, all of which I think can continue to be a powerful pool of data that will be available to us.
I think as far as next EHR partners, we're going to monitor how we do with the existing AMD user base, assuming that we can demonstrate the improvements and our customers find value in that. Certainly, we will start to sequence the second and third and subsequent EHRs. We've got a pretty good prioritized list but I want to see that we can make sure that we demonstrate the value through the AMD partnership as a bit of a predicate.
Operator
Our final question comes from the line of Daniel Stauder with Citizens JMP.
Daniel Stauder
I just wanted to follow up on some of the questions for -- on the segment level in terms of margin, specifically on clinics. So strong improvement in gross margin, even more so on the operating margin, and you gave some commentary there already. But was there anything else beyond your progress on efficiency and workflow there that led to a benefit, maybe broader change in the average occupancy or some product mix benefits within clinics.
And it sounds like you still think there's room to improve, but with that incremental sales rep investment, do you think that's going to be absorbed pretty well into margins? Just how should we think about that?
Daniel Reuvers
Sure. I think there's probably 2 components to the margin, and let me just revisit the rep cost issue. On Greenbrook, most of the margin improvement was better revenue cycle management, more so than mix. I think on the NeuroStar side, it's a mix function. We continue to see, as I said, more than half of our capital units went out -- more than half of our units went out as capital or lease purchases. And when that happens, they go out at a premium. So I think the combination between those 2 were probably the most significant contributors on the gross margin side. Just back to the rep cost. Our goal is to add 8 reps to our already base of 20 that would take us to 28 by sometime in Q1. We don't expect any incremental cost associated with that. And it doesn't -- it's not magic. It's just we're going to repurpose a number of the dollars that are going into direct-to-consumer adds and sponsor more salespeople.
And we've done enough data dive to be quite convinced that our return on our field salespeople is much higher. First of all, they have access to pharma data. We know who the prescribers are at a primary care or psychiatry office in the communities where we have Greenbrook clinics. We also know how many patients each of them treat with 2 or more MDD drugs. So it's easier to target the right audience. And what we find is the patients that are referred to us from those practices are come in much better qualified and more likely for us to be able to help them.
Patients who come in through DTC, while they're well intentioned and we'd love to help them if they don't qualify, if they haven't failed on 2 meds, we can't, yet it can clog up our intake teams as well, trying to help patients that ultimately won't qualify and we can't get them into a treatment room. So I think that we expect the yield to be better and we also expect that our allocation of sales and marketing dollars to provide a better return for us.
Daniel Stauder
That's great color. And just a follow-up there. You hit on NeuroStar margins. Just with some of the shifting dynamics with capital, even within capital and session mix, how should we think about a more steady state gross margin here as this normalizes the levels we've seen this quarter and in 2Q, what we should think about going forward? Or is there any puts and takes we should consider?
Daniel Reuvers
Yes. I don't know that I would predict any dramatic swings in gross margin on NeuroStar. I think we're already starting to see the mix settle in a little bit more to a predictable future state mix. So I think we're starting to see a reflection of what that margin might look like. So I think it continues to depend on what the adoption rates are in our offering. But at this point, I don't know that I would expect any dramatic swings either way on gross margin from what we've seen more recently.
Daniel Stauder
Great. And I'll try to squeeze one more in here. Just you talked about some of that data on gap in treatment and missed days. Do you feel that this could alter how providers think about treatment regimens in the future? And how could that give patients more flexibility and optionality? And what's the pathway for that potential change becoming a reality?
Daniel Reuvers
Yes. I think that's a great question. And I think it's an important one. This is the reference to the article in the TMS Journal that we had published demonstrating that a patient could miss days as many as 13 days. It doesn't mean that they don't get their full treatment. It just means that there could be lapses in those days. And with up to 13 days of missed treatments, there was no demonstrated reduction in effectiveness.
And I think the relevance there is that for patients that have been reluctant to say, yes, I will go ahead and start a regimen of TMS. I think a lot of them may -- like all of us in life, life is busy. And gee, I've got a commitment next week or there's a holiday trip I'm going to take or my kids are off school that day or I can't get off work, whatever it might be, it's a commitment to be in TMS therapy for 7 weeks. The ability to be able to understand that I can actually take a break and still get the benefit, I think it's a welcome mat for patients that have been reluctant to start or for referral sources for the same reasons, who've been reluctant to send them our way.
And then even in the fourth quarter, you think about holidays, a lot of times, patients may be reluctant to start. The message that I think this sends resoundingly is start now, don't wait. If there has to be a break, there has to be a break but suffering from depression can be a debilitating condition. So we want to help patients start to initiate the therapy as quickly as we can.
Operator
This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it back to Dan Reuvers for final remarks. Dan?
Daniel Reuvers
Thank you, and thanks for everybody for participating and joining us for the call. We're delighted to continue to demonstrate progress, and we certainly look forward to sharing our full year results once they're completed in 2027. Until then, thank you again.
Operator
We appreciate you for participating in today's conference call. This does conclude the presentation. You may now disconnect. Thank you.
本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。








