tradingkey.logo
搜索

ZoomInfo (GTM) 2026财年第三季度业绩电话会:营收下滑3%,上调业绩指引

2026年11月4日 23:43
facebooktwitterlinkedin

ZoomInfo公布2026财年第三季度GAAP营收为3.09亿美元,同比下降3%,但调整后营业利润达1.19亿美元,利润率扩大至39%。净营收留存率降至88%,主要受软件垂直领域需求疲软拖累;高端市场表现稳健,年合同价值至少10万美元的客户数及ACV均创历史新高。公司管理层上调2026财年全年营收指引至12.235亿至12.265亿美元,并预计调整后营业利润为4.52亿至4.55亿美元。同时,公司计划推出GTM1平台并采用混合定价模式,以应对当前增长逆风。

该摘要由AI生成

核心要点

  • ZoomInfo (GTM)公布2026财年第三季度GAAP营收为3.09亿美元,同比下降3%。调整后营业利润增长1%至1.19亿美元,营业利润率扩大1.5个百分点至39%。
  • 净营收留存率从89%降至88%,主要原因是软件垂直领域的向上销售数量减少且规模变小。高端市场年化合同价值(ACV)同比持平,而低端市场ACV下降14%。
  • 超过10,000家客户通过较新的接口访问了ZoomInfo数据,包括其MCP服务器、命令行界面和更新后的API。尽管大多数使用消耗的是此前购买的点数,但这些渠道的消耗量环比翻倍。
  • 高端市场客户目前占ACV的77%。来自年消费额至少10万美元客户的ACV增长4%,同时公司在该群体中的百万美元级客户数量及ACV均创下历史新高。
  • 管理层上调了2026财年全年业绩指引,预计营收为12.235亿至12.265亿美元,调整后营业利润为4.52亿至4.55亿美元。
  • 管理层表示,相信ZoomInfo正接近增长逆风的低谷,理由是计划推出GTM1、数据消耗量上升,以及2026财年前九个月老客户回归数量增长超10%。

关键财务数据

指标2026财年第三季度变化或背景
GAAP营收3.09亿美元同比下降3%;高于公司指引
调整后营业利润1.19亿美元同比增长1%
调整后营业利润率39%同比扩大1.5个百分点
GAAP经营活动现金流4700万美元季度末拥有现金、现金等价物及投资1.42亿美元
无杠杆自由现金流8700万美元利润率为28%;调整后营业利润转化率为73%
净营收留存率88%低于此前89%
高端市场ACV占比77%高端市场ACV同比持平
低端市场ACV—同比下降14%
递延收入4.21亿美元季度末
剩余履约义务11亿美元预计将在12个月内确认7.93亿美元
总债务12亿美元净杠杆率改善至过去12个月调整后EBITDA的2.2倍

业务与运营表现

经营环境依然严峻,尤其是软件领域,该领域在ZoomInfo业务中的占比从2021年的45%降至约30%。管理层表示,买方决策团队扩大、对供应商审核趋严以及销售周期延长,继续对新业务和向上销售造成拖累。

在最大型客户群中的表现更为强劲,尤其是金融、保险、房地产和制造业。年合同价值至少在10万美元以上的客户ACV同比增长4%,尽管该群体的客户数量下降了2%。运营业务ACV继续保持两位数增长。

ZoomInfo计划在本季度末推出GTM1。该平台旨在将销售、营销、运营和AI Agent整合至统一的数据与上下文层。公司还引入了将固定承诺与数据及AI消耗点数相结合的混合定价模式,从而降低对基于席位定价的依赖。

通过新接口的消耗量环比翻倍。管理层提醒称,由于客户通常使用的是此前已购买的点数,该活动目前对近期营收的影响有限。只有当客户用尽现有额度、扩大合同规模或过渡到按需付费定价时,预计才会带来增量营收。

该公司还添加了与ClickUp和n8n的原生集成,并成为Salesforce外向型销售Agent“Hunter”的旗舰数据合作伙伴。对00.ai和WorkBounce的收购则为其增加了协调Agent团队的能力,以及用于整合结构化和非结构化客户数据的语义知识层。

第三季度期间,ZoomInfo以750万美元(平均价格为每股2.94美元)回购了250万股股票。公司还以3100万美元注销了3500万美元的高级债券,使预计的年度现金利息支出减少了100多万美元。

管理层业绩指引

指引指标2026财年第四季度2026财年全年
GAAP营收2.94亿至2.97亿美元12.235亿至12.265亿美元
调整后营业利润1.13亿至1.16亿美元4.52亿至4.55亿美元
非GAAP稀释每股收益0.285至0.295美元1.125至1.135美元
无杠杆自由现金流—4.05亿至4.25亿美元

按中点计算,全年营收指引意味着同比下降2%,而调整后营业利润率预计约为37%。

第四季度的展望假设经营环境保持不变,销售周期不缩短,且定价模式转变与GTM1推广均未带来净收益。管理层表示,上述任何领域的改善都将构成本次指引区间的上行空间。

风险与关注点

  • 软件领域的疲软继续对新业务、向上销售和净营收留存率造成压力。
  • 高端客户群体中偏中下层级的客户在增量采购方面面临最大的逆风。
  • 由于当前活动很大一部分使用的是此前承诺的点数,消耗量的增长可能不会立即转化为营收。
  • 当前剩余履约义务下降了4%,管理层认为这比季度当前预订额增长更具参考价值。较少的替代交易和大型早期续约影响了对比数据。
  • 第四季度是ZoomInfo销售活动规模最大的季度,导致高端和低端市场的ACV结果存在更大的不确定性。
  • 针对2024年证券诉讼计划达成的4400万美元和解协议仍需获得法院批准。ZoomInfo预计根据相关保险单可收回2500万美元,用于支付辩护费用和和解责任。

分析师问答精选

混合定价与客户经济学:管理层表示,客户可以在更多固定数据点数方案与可变AI点数消耗之间做出选择。一些用批量数据点数替代席位的客户以类似的支出水平续约,而其他客户最初以较低水平续约,但创造了未来由消耗驱动扩张的机会。

GTM1采纳情况:ZoomInfo最初组建了一支小型团队,向新老客户推介新平台和新定价模式。公司计划进行更大范围的推广,理由是数十家已在使用该平台的客户给出了积极的早期反馈。

AI Agent作为消耗驱动力:管理层表示,客户正在通过Grok、Vercel、Replit、n8n和Zapier等工具构建的Agent和工作流中使用ZoomInfo的数据。Agent团队将通过AI点数和数据点数双重模式实现商业化变现。

竞争定位:管理层将企业需求归因于数据质量、广度、隐私、安全和合规性。管理层指出,对于那些正在评估成本更低的AI原生替代方案的大型客户而言,这些因素尤为重要。

债务到期情况:ZoomInfo拥有将于2029年2月到期的5.57亿美元高级债券、2030年2月到期的5.78亿美元第一受偿权定期贷款,以及2028年2月到期的1亿美元已提用循环信贷额度。管理层表示,对债务到期结构及公司的现金产生能力感到满意。

业绩电话会议完整文字记录


完整财报电话会议逐字稿

管理层陈述

Operator

To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising that your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. And I'd like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Jerry Szczeski. Please go ahead.

Jeremiah Sisitsky

Thank you. Welcome to Zoom Info's Q3 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. With me on the call today are Henry Schuck, founder and CEO, and Graham O'Brien, Chief Financial Officer. this call, any forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of U.S. securities laws. Expressions of future goals, including business outlook, expectations for future financial performance, and similar items, including, without limitation, expressions using the terminology may, will, expect, and will not. and believe, and expressions which reflect something other than historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in the risk factors sections of our SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Because undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events that may arise after this conference call, except as required by law. For more information, please refer to the forward-looking statements in the slides posted to our Investor Relations website. at ir.zoominfo.com.

All metrics on this call are non-GAAP unless otherwise noted. A reconciliation can be found in the financial results press release or in the slides hosted to our IR website.

Henry Schuck

that, I'll turn the call over to Henry. Thank you, Jerry, and welcome everyone. We continue to operate the business efficiently and are encouraged by early feedback on our GTM1 platform and the consumption of our data and context across new surface areas. GAAP revenue was $309 million and adjusted operating income was $119 million, a margin of 39%, up one and a half points year over year. While we exceeded our guidance, we did not see improvement in the operating environment, particularly in software. Up market ACV was flat year over year and net revenue retention was 88%. We continue to see pressure in the software vertical, which is about 30% of our business, down from 45% since 2021.

As companies in that vertical manage through their own challenges, buying groups have gotten larger, vendor scrutiny has made sales cycles longer, and we see that in new business and upsells. With our largest customers, particularly those in finance, insurance, real estate, and manufacturing, we continue to perform well, ending the quarter with a record number of million-dollar customers and record ACV from that cohort. The divergence between the software vertical and our largest customers is reflected in our results. We have been working intentionally on initiatives to change that. First is GTM1, which launches this quarter and introduces the market to real multiplayer go-to-market AI, one platform where sales, marketing, and operations run on the same data and context with agents that work across all of it. With GTM One, our customers transition from buying seats or data files from us and instead buy a trusted, always-on, entity-resolved view of their market that they can put to work wherever their go-to-market work happens. that is in our application, in an AI agent, or in something they've built themselves. As more of that work moves to agents, the need for more accurate and governed data increases and is why our largest customers continue to expand with ZoomInfo.

The second is consumption. More than 10,000 customers have accessed our data and contacts through surfaces that did not exist at the beginning of the year. Our MCP server, our command line interface, and an updated API. Consumption across those surfaces doubled sequentially and is well on the way to becoming a meaningful contributor to financial results. Right now, most of that usage is customers drawing down capacity they have already bought from us. So today it shows up as utilization of credit they already hold rather than as new ACV. As customers use up what they've purchased and expand with us, and as we move more customers on to consumption pricing, the next increase in the amount of money they're going to be of usage comes with incremental revenue. We made progress across three areas of focus during the quarter.

First, we kept moving the business up market. More than three quarters of our ACV is now up market, a 14 point shift over the last three years. We have been intentional about this shift. We've moved sales resources to our more valuable customer relationships, and we lead down market with a digital motion that cost us less than it did a year ago. Second, in Q3, we introduced new hybrid pricing and packaging models geared to expand our non-seat mix. Since then, we have selectively introduced this to existing customers. While early, we've seen good results and received very positive feedback from the customer base.

We will continue to roll this out more broadly. Third, we delivered the second half product releases that we talked about in August. And each of them puts our data and context into more of the places where go-to-market work gets done. We launched native integrations with ClickUp and n8n, and were named a flagship data partner for Hunter, Salesforce's new outbound sales agent. Our acquisition of 00.ai introduced our agent team's functionality that coordinates teams of agents to run complete go-to-market plays within the controls customers set. Our acquisition of WorkBounce strengthened our go-to-market context graph, which now has a semantic knowledge layer, so structured and unstructured data from CRMs, emails, call transcripts, and other systems integrates with ZoomInfo data. We're unifying our platform together into GTM1, where the entire go-to-market organization, sales, marketing, operations, and agents runs on one ZoomInfo instance.

Two deals from the quarter highlight this. A Fortune 500 global industrial automation and aerospace conglomerate closed the Master Data Foundation project with us as part of its go-to-market AI program. Their AI initiatives stalled at the data layer with incomplete data stranded across legacy systems. Their sellers were already using Zoom info to prioritize accounts and act on buying signals, and we are now consolidating contact data from multiple CRM and marketing systems into a single trusted source for them. And a social media management platform signed a multi-year deal as a new customer with a combination of seats and data after comparing our data, functionality, and pricing across a broad competitive set. This transaction also reflects the success of our enterprise sales motion, closing larger, more comprehensive initial customer lands. We also closed upmarket opportunities with Tishman Speyer, one of the world's largest private real estate investment and development firms, Audacy, the US Audio Network, Garner Health, a data-driven health tech firm, and SurveyMonkey, the leading provider of survey and market research tools.

On capital allocation, during the quarter, we retired 35 million of senior notes for 31 million and repurchased 7.5 million of stock, with net leverage improving for the third consecutive quarter. The market is challenged, but the expansion and growth we see across our largest customers and the consumption growth we see across new surface areas gives us increased confidence in the durability of our data assets. What we are seeing from the early users of GTM1, and especially our field's excitement to bring it to market, gives us increased confidence in the opportunity in front of us. We fully expect to continue to deliver attractive free cashflow per share outcomes over time. I would lastly emphasize that we're running this company with a disciplined focus on long-term outcomes as we navigate near-term headwinds. That said, I believe we are approaching the trough of our growth headwinds, and I'm encouraged by the upside potential across several business drivers. that, I'll turn the call over to Graham. Thanks, Henry. Q3 GAAP revenue was $309 million, down 3% year over year, and above the high end of our guidance.

Adjusted operating income was $119 million, also above the high end of our guidance, and up 1% year over year, with a margin of 39%. In a seasonally slower cash conversion quarter, unlevered free cash flow was $87 million, with $21 million in interest paid in cash during the quarter. In addition to exceeding our guidance in Q3, we are also raising guidance for the full year. Upmarket ACV mix is now 77%, and upmarket ACV was flat year-over-year, down from 3% growth in the second quarter. Downmarket ACV declined 14% year-over-year in Q3. Operations ACV continued to grow double digits. Our sales resources are focused on the highest customer lifetime value up market relationships and Our shift upmarket over the last few years has resulted in a more resilient and healthier customer base.

In the down market, leading with a product-led growth motion is helping us execute with fewer sales and marketing resources compared to a year ago. The current environment has been consistent with prior quarters. The software vertical, which represents approximately 30% of our business, remains challenged. We are seeing longer sales cycles with larger buying groups requiring more buy-in for projects of all sizes, which is primarily impacting new business and upsells. While we are seeing encouraging consumption trends across our new surface areas, that consumption is often drawing down on pre-existing commitments, which may lead to a timing difference between credit consumption and financial results. ACV from customers with at least $100,000 in ACV increased 4% year-over-year, while logos in that cohort decreased 2% year-over-year. The quality of that cohort is improving as our largest customers increase their spend with us.

In Q3, we reached a record level of million-dollar customers and record ACV from that cohort. Net revenue retention was 88% in Q3, down from 89%. Gross retention improved sequentially in both the software and non-software verticals. The step-down in net retention is largely driven by fewer and smaller upsells, primarily in software. Year-to-date total restructuring charges for the program announced in May were $29 million, and we estimate total charges of approximately $33 million. In October, we entered into a memorandum of understanding to settle our 2024 securities litigation, Pending approval by the court, we expect a payment of $44 million, and we are entitled to recover $25 million related to legal and litigation defense costs, as well as the settlement liability under applicable insurance policies. Turning to cash, GAAP operating cash flow was $47 million in Q3.

Unlevered free cash flow for the quarter was $87 million, 73% conversion from adjusted operating income, and a margin of 28%. GAAP stock-based compensation expense was $31 million, or 10% of revenue. We continue to be mindful of the mix of cash compensation and equity, and we are leaning into more performance-based equity, ensuring at-risk compensation is tied to achieving financial objectives. In the quarter, we repurchased 2.5 million shares of stock at an average price of $2.94 per share, for a total of $7.5 million. We retired $35 million in aggregate principal of our senior notes for $31 million, which reduces future cash interest payments by more than $1 million per year. We expect to be investing across the capital structure when opportunities present themselves. Weighted average diluted shares outstanding for the quarter used in calculating non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was 317 million, and the non-GAAP share count exiting Q3 2026 was 319 million.

We ended the quarter with $142 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments, and we carried $1.2 billion in gross debt. Our total net leverage ratio is 2.2 times trailing 12 months adjusted EBITDA and 2.2 times trailing 12 months cash EBITDA, which is defined as consolidated EBITDA in our credit agreements, compared with 2.3 times as of Q2, the third consecutive quarter of improved leverage. The aggregate remaining balance of $557 million in senior notes mature in 2029, and the $578 million first lien term loan matures in 2030. The $100 million balance under the first lien revolver is due in 2028. We believe we have sufficient liquidity and cash generation, and we are comfortable with our current maturity profile. With respect to liabilities and future performance obligations, unearned revenue at the end of the quarter was $421 million and remaining performance obligations or RPO were $1.1 billion, of which $793 million are expected to be recognized in the next 12 months. Shifting to guidance, for the fourth quarter, we expect GAAP revenue in the range of $294 to $297 million, adjusted operating income in the range of $113 to $116 million, and non-GAAP net income in the range of $28.5 to $29.5 cents per share.

Our fourth quarter guidance assumes the environment remains consistent, that sales cycles do not shorten, and the pricing transition and GTM-1 rollout contribute no net benefit. Any improvement in those factors will be upside to the range. For the full year 2026, we are raising our guidance, and we now expect GAAP revenue in the range of $1.2235 to $1.2265 billion, representing a 2% year-over-year decline at the midpoint of guidance. adjusted operating income in the range of $452 to $455 million, representing a 37% margin at the midpoint of guidance, We expect non-GAAP net income in the range of $1.12 and a half to $1.13 and a half per share, based on 318 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding. and we expect unlevered free cash flow in the range of $405 to $425 million. Similar to last quarter, we have rolled the third quarter overperformance into the full year range and otherwise held our approach to guidance unchanged. Now, I will turn it over to the operator to open the call for questions.

Operator

Thank you very much. At this time we will conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star 1 1 on your telephone and wait for the name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1 1 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first call comes from the line of Jaden Patel at JPMorgan. Jaden, your line is open.

分析师问答

Jaiden Patel

Hey, thanks for taking the question. Net retention slipped a point to 88% and upmarket ACV growth went from positive 3% to flat. Though you mentioned that the 1 million plus cohort is the strongest it's ever been. Can you talk a little bit about what's happening maybe in the middle of the upmarket base, maybe outside of the software vertical?.

Henry Schuck

follow up. Yes, the lower end of our upmarket business is we're seeing the kind of the greatest headwinds and that's showing up in incremental purchasing. So new business and upsell that upsell deficit is what is really driving the sequential decline in that overall retention number. The growth retention in the upmarket business is holding in very well in actually improving in software and continuing to hold in well across our non-software verticals.

Jaiden Patel

Got it. Okay. Thank you. And then, you know, SurveyMonkey was an interesting upmarket deal. Can you maybe talk a little bit about what drives customers like them to ZoomInfo versus potentially cheaper AI native competitors?.

Henry Schuck

I think it's largely high quality data, a broad set of data, and then more today than ever context around that data that agents can manage on top of. I think one of the things that we've been seeing in the competitive market is there are a bunch of low-end, vibe-coded applications that do a pretty poor job of putting data together and then they come and go. In the last couple of weeks, I've seen numerous of these companies actually just completely close their businesses. And so trust is very important in the upmarket, our ability to deliver high-quality data, data with the privacy, security, and compliance that comes along with that is really important to our upmarket customers. And where a downmarket customer might be wooed by a vibe-coded alternative, the upmarket is smarter about their buying decisions and the buying cycles there, and they value high quality, data that comes with privacy guarantees and compliance and security that is unmatched. Great. Thank you.

Operator

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Brad Zelnick of Deutsche Bank. Brad, your line is open.

Brad Zelnick

Awesome. Thank you guys so much for taking the question. You talked about the new hybrid pricing and packaging strategy. Can you walk us through the details, what it hopes to capture, what the upside and downside is for different types of customers, and just all the thinking and mechanics behind it? And related to that, maybe for Graham, as we think about backlog, RPO, CRPO, look to have deteriorated. And I'm curious, but I see your guide for cash flow in the full year still looks pretty healthy. Am I correlating the wrong things? Is there maybe any relationship to the new pricing? We'd love to hear any additional clarity that you can provide there as well. Thank you.

Henry Schuck

guys? Yes, I can start on the pricing approach and the modeling on that. You know, I think the idea here was that flexibility became paramount as we started building this and testing it internally and certainly with customers. You know, our stated goal from a few quarters ago was to move away from a seat-based model that doesn't necessarily mean that we're moving to a full consumption model. And what we found is we've been able to design not just the product and go-to-market align, but the actual pricing, packaging, provisioning of it in a way that can be flexible and meet the appetite of a customer that wants more of a fixed investment, while also being able to be packaged in a way that meets the customer that prefers a more variable arrangement. So what that means is that we're able to offer kind of fixed arrangements on the data credit consumption side, and then really make sure that we are doing a thoughtful job of sizing up the AI credit consumption purchase in a way that gives the customer a level of comfort in that first year on the new product. The, you know, throughout this process, it really came down to simplicity for the customer and then reducing barriers to consumption once they get into the product. And then on the RPO billing bookings front, you know, I say that the billings growth is pretty consistent with the revenue results and was in line with our expectations.

The current bookings is impacted by a few things. If you recall last year in this quarter, we had an upside result the other way in current bookings. I think that was like plus 18. It's really a story this year of fewer superseding deals, which can accelerate some of that RPO and bookings into a given period. Fewer larger early renewals, which can do the same thing. And then a little bit of nuance around how current bookings roll off in the final year of a long-term contract. with the organic decline. I think that the current RPO decrease of 4% is probably more telling than the current bookings growth in the quarter.

Brad Zelnick

Thank you so much for taking my questions. One moment for our next question.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Alan Borofsky of U.S. Bancorp. Your line is open.

Allan M. Verkhovski

Awesome. Hey guys, thanks for taking the question here. It's encouraging to hear that gross retention improved sequentially Henry can you unpack? What gives you confidence that you're approaching the trough of growth headwinds you mentioned at the end of your prepared remarks?.

Henry Schuck

I think it was a couple of things. One, we have not gotten benefit from or are building in any benefit from our new GTM One platform, which is by all measures the best technology and product we've ever built at ZoomInfo. We expect to launch that later this quarter. Our entire sales team is on it, and we have a couple dozen customers who are on it today that are big fans of the product and recognize its ability to bring data and context together in a unique way for agents and humans to operate across. So we have a lot of confidence about that new product. And then the next thing is on consumption. We've been focused on driving consumption across our customer base.

We now have over 10,000 users who are using our 10,000 customers using our new surface areas and consuming data on surface areas that didn't exist a year ago and consuming our data and our context at significantly higher rates than they had been in the past on our legacy platforms. We think that's a trend that's going to continue. And then we're seeing a lot of customers come back to us from even just a year ago. In the first three quarters of the year, the number of customers who left and came back is up more than 10% year over year. And I think what's happening is they're getting burned by promises from other providers in the space and they're coming to us in and at higher rates than than we've seen in the past. That's all great to hear. And I guess just a quick.

Allan M. Verkhovski

follow up for you, Graham. Do you mind just sharing what your expectations are for upmarket ACV? in Q4 and maybe some of the assumptions behind that?.

Unknown Speaker

Yes, Q4 is our largest sales activity quarter. So naturally, there's a little bit more variability there. We continue to assume a range of outcomes across upmarket and downmarket, where the growth rate of each could stay the same or get worse in the guidance. But overall, it's a consistent approach to guidance. Got it. Thank you guys. Appreciate it. One moment for our next question.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Billy Fitzsimmons of Piper Sandler. Billy, your line is open.

William Fitzsimmons

Hey guys, thanks for taking the question here. I guess with I imagine it is still very early with this new hybrid pricing model, but maybe for you, Henry, any initial takes or customer anecdotes you can share on how kind of the first wave of customers are utilizing the product and the new pricing and packaging and kind of similar to maybe the last two questions isn't the core question maybe for you Graham on kind of monetization is how How do we start to think about those customers when they move from seats to a hybrid model ultimately paying the same on a per dollar basis after they make that transition. Any early reads from the initial customers you can share would be helpful. Thank you, guys.

Henry Schuck

Sure, I think that the product strategy and the pricing and packaging strategy really follow what we anticipated would happen to software generally, but our business specifically, which is a lot of customers want to build their own front end application layers. They large engineering teams and they want to build custom workflow for their internal teams. And that workflow requires data and context and data from us and context that we're able to deliver by marrying an entity matching their data. And so we're seeing customers show up and say, listen, I'm going to build all of the front end application layer myself. And so we're seeing customers who show up and say, I'm going to build all of the front-end application layer in Replit or Vercel or in Claude, but I need your data and I need way more of it than I've ever needed before, but I don't need the seats. And so we made the data and the context super modular. They can take it anywhere they want.

We've built native integrations into a number of these systems so they can get it in the systems that they're already operating in. And so what you'll see with those customers is kind of two things. One, we can shift the seats into a larger space larger bulk credit consumption package. And so they get significantly more data and they're able to use that data in any of their own internal applications. We see some customers renew flat there. We see some customers who renewed down a bit, but put us in a position to drive consumption with them again over time. And so I think that's the big thing that we're seeing and the reason why we've evolved the product strategy and the pricing and packaging strategy around that.

Our data is still incredibly valuable into go-to-market workflows, but a number of our customers have their own want to build their own front end application layers. And we're happy to be the key component into that.

Operator

thank you very much one moment for our next question our next question comes from the line of matthew bullock of bank of america Matt your line's open.

Jacob Gideon

Hi, this is Jacob Gideon on for Matt. Could you just maybe talk about what customers you're targeting for the selective rollout of the new model? Is it all or only new customers, or are you targeting existing customers for the new model? And then, I guess, related to that, what verticals, specifically maybe across the 10,000 that are hitting the new surface areas are really kind of the strongest with this kind of ramping consumption approach to using the data. Thanks.

Henry Schuck

Yes. On the first question, it's both. We spent the first month of the quarter with a small tiger team, both on existing business and for new business, taking the new platform and the new pricing and packaging out to our customer base. So it is both. When we think about it, it's both. about the rest of the quarter, we anticipate being more aggressive with the customers we put our new platform and new pricing and packaging in front of. I think the goal there is customers know ZoomInfo in one way, and they think of us as data, and particularly companies contact data. And we've spent the last two years really rebuilding our platform to be agent first. And we've built everything from the ground up, which allows us to iterate and innovate much faster than before. And so the thing that we hear most often when we show up to the customers is like, okay, wow, I didn't think of ZoomInfo this way. did all of these things.

I was looking at this other provider, but now I know that you guys can do this already, and I want to try that out with you." And so we're getting a lot of positive feedback in that direction, and we want to really press the gas on having this new platform in front of as many of our customers as possible. so we'll be pretty aggressive around the rollout, around the customers who are... consuming across our new surface areas. Actually, the industries are pretty diverse. So there isn't like one specific industry or type of company that's using it the most. What I would tell you is the highest consumption comes from go-to-market builders, those who are in sales ops, rev ops, marketing ops, go-to-market engineers, people on the business intelligence or engineering side of their companies are the largest consumers of our data through those new surface areas. got it thank you appreciate it.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader of KeyBank Capital Markets. Jackson, your line is open.

Nathaniel Van Ruoss

Great. Hey guys, this is Nate Rose on for Jackson Adder. Thanks for taking our questions. So I know it's a new product, but how should we think about the commercialization of agent teams since it doesn't require a separate SKU and it's embedded inside a studio? And then what are the adoption proof points we should be looking at going forward?.

Henry Schuck

The agent teams will monetize through both AI credits and data credits. And so the same sort of pricing and packaging where a customer buys consumption credits, both AI and data credits will run through agent teams. And so those end up being the metrics consumption across both of those vectors. Those end up being the metrics.

Nathaniel Van Ruoss

Okay, yes, super helpful. And then I'm curious about AI agents accessing Zoom info data. Are you guys seeing a ramp of this activity? Yes. Could this possibly create an inflection for the consumption element as part of the hybrid model?.

Henry Schuck

And I think that is what we're seeing in the doubling of consumption quarter over quarter on those new surface areas. And particularly across the customers who are using the most credits, what they're building are agents that go out and find net new buyers and build into a key go-to-market workflow on a repeatable basis. And so like if today you built a Grok bot, you could plug ZoomInfo into the Grok bot and it'll search across ZoomInfo data and bring your context and your data together within the Grok bot. Or the same thing applies to... a Vercel application you build, a Replit application you build, a workflow that you build in N8n or Zapier where we've built native integrations. And so in all of those places where ZoomInfo data now exists natively through our MCP and our APIs, when you build an ongoing workflow that an agent runs for you, it pulls ZoomInfo data on a regular basis or in a dynamic way.

Operator

Thanks, guys. Thank you very much. Our next call comes from the line of Patrick Walravens of Citizens. Patrick, your line is open.

Patrick Walravens

Oh, great. This is Kincaid on for Pat. Thanks for taking the question. Graham, could you just walk us again through the components of the debt when it matures, if the part that matures in 2028 must be addressed in 2027 and what the overall plan is to reduce debt load?.

Unknown Speaker

Sure. We've got our senior notes that mature in February, 2029. got our first lien term loan that matures in February 2030. And then we have a revolver where we've drawn 100 million and that matures in February 2028. On the senior notes, there's about 557 million outstanding and on the first lien, 578 million million dollars outstanding. We continue to generate significant cash flow and are really comfortable with the ability to continue to do that and to deploy that capital in attractive ways ahead of those maturities. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Operator

This concludes our question and answer session. Thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program, and you may now disconnect.

This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review.

[Call has ended.]

This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review.

本文部分内容由AI生成和翻译并经人工审核,仅供参考与一般资讯用途,不构成投资建议。

免责声明:本网站提供的信息仅供教育和参考之用,不应视为财务或投资建议。

推荐文章

tradingkey.logo
风险提示:我们的网站和移动应用程序仅提供关于某些投资产品的一般信息。Finsights 不提供财务建议或对任何投资产品的推荐,且提供此类信息不应被解释为 Finsights 提供财务建议或推荐。
投资产品存在重大投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金,且可能并不适合所有人。投资产品的过去表现并不代表其未来表现。
Finsights 可能允许第三方广告商或关联公司在我们的网站或移动应用程序的任何部分放置或投放广告,并可能根据您与广告的互动情况获得报酬。
© 版权所有: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. 版权所有