tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
Search

IJJ vs. SLYV: Which Value ETF Is the Better Buy Today?

The Motley FoolJul 12, 2026 10:55 AM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
View all comments0

Key Points

  • IJJ has delivered a higher five-year total return with less volatility than SLYV.

  • SLYV carries a lower expense ratio and offers a higher dividend yield than IJJ.

  • IJJ concentrates on mid-caps, while SLYV targets smaller companies.

When hunting for undervalued U.S. stocks, investors don't have to pick just one corner of the market. Two popular value funds -- the iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (NYSEMKT:IJJ) and the State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:SLYV) -- offer very different ways to invest in the same theme.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricSLYVIJJ
IssuerState StreetiShares
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
1-year return (as of July 9, 2026)31.36%16.24%
Dividend yield1.81%1.59%
Beta1.070.96
AUM$4.8 billion$8.7 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

SLYV is the cheaper of the two funds, charging a 0.15% expense ratio versus 0.18% for IJJ. It also pays more in dividends, with a yield that’s 0.22 percentage points higher than IJJ's.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricSLYVIJJ
Max drawdown (5 yr)(28.68%)(22.67%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,418$1,521

Launched in 2000, IJJ tracks a benchmark of mid-sized U.S. equities that screen as undervalued. Its portfolio spans 304 stocks, led by US Foods (NYSE:USFD) at 1.3%, TD SYNNEX (NYSE:SNX) at 1.2%, and Reliance (NYSE:RS) at 1.1%. The fund’s top sectors include financial services at 21.8%, industrials at 19.1%, and consumer cyclical at 14.0%.

SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, focusing on the smaller end of the market-cap spectrum. SLYV casts a wider net with 462 different securities, and its largest positions include Molina Healthcare (NYSE:MOH) at 1.3%, Match Group (NASDAQ:MTCH) at 1.0%, and Eastman Chemical (NYSE:EMN) at 0.8%. Its top sectors include financial services at 20.2%, consumer cyclical at 15.2%, and technology at 13.4%. SLYV was also launched in 2000.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Deciding between these two ETFs is really a question about how much risk you want to take on for a similar style of investing.

Mid-cap value funds like IJJ tend to hold more established companies -- names with steadier cash flows and, often, less dramatic price swings -- which is part of why IJJ has seen a lower five-year maximum drawdown than SLYV. On the other hand, SLYV offers greater exposure to smaller companies that are earlier in their growth curve -- but it also has a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield.

Market-cap exposure is one of the biggest -- and most overlooked -- decisions in building a diversified portfolio. Investors who only own mega-cap or large-cap funds can miss out on the return potential smaller companies have historically offered over full market cycles, even if that potential comes with bumpier rides along the way. On the other hand, tilting too far into small caps can mean more volatility than some investors are comfortable holding, especially late in an economic cycle when smaller, more leveraged companies are typically the first to feel the pinch.

Either fund can be the right choice depending on what you’re looking for. Investors who prioritize stability and are willing to accept a slightly higher cost may lean toward IJJ, while those seeking higher income and lower fees -- and who can stomach more volatility -- may prefer SLYV. Some investors might also choose to split the difference, holding both to get exposure across the value spectrum.

Should you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $395,679!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,294,805!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 929% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 12, 2026.

Andy Gould has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Match Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Comments (0)

Click the $ button, enter the symbol, and select to link a stock, ETF, or other ticker.

0/500
Commenting Guidelines
Loading...

Recommended Articles

tradingkey.logo
Risk Warning: Our Website and Mobile App provides only general information on certain investment products. Finsights does not provide, and the provision of such information must not be construed as Finsights providing, financial advice or recommendation for any investment product.
Investment products are subject to significant investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested and may not be suitable for everyone. Past performance of investment products is not indicative of their future performance.
Finsights may allow third party advertisers or affiliates to place or deliver advertisements on our Website or Mobile App or any part thereof and may be compensated by them based on your interaction with the advertisements.
© Copyright: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. All Rights Reserved.