tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
Search

Arbitrum halts ETH transfers to contain fallout from KelpDAO hack

CryptopolitanApr 21, 2026 8:15 AM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
View all comments0

Arbitrum decided on an unprecedented move, freezing ETH to prevent further losses from the KelpDAO attack. The protocol may prevent some of the bad debt on its native version of Aave. 

Arbitrum has announced the freeze of 30,776 ETH held on Arbitrum One and traced it back to the KelpDAO. The tokens, valued at $71M, were not bridged back to Ethereum for mixing days after the hack, allowing Arbitrum a window of action. 

The chain’s Security Council decided to freeze the funds, as large hacks are becoming a burden for DeFi protocols. The funds were moved to a new secure wallet, not accessible to the hackers, and can only be released after a new governance decision by Arbitrum’s council. 

Arbitrum’s actions are one of the biggest freezes following a hack. The large losses in the past month raised the issue of freezing funds on time, despite the initial ethos of not censoring on-chain movements. Soon after the funds were frozen, the hacker started moving and mixing the remaining ETH, diminishing hopes of a recovery. 

The Security Council held a long discussion before deciding to act. In previous hacks, funds were rarely frozen, even by chains with the explicit right to blacklist wallets. In this case, Arbitrum decided to act and prevent bad debt contagion by reclaiming some of the lost ETH.

Arbitrum joins wider decision to freeze ETH

Arbitrum was the latest stage in a wider decision to contain the lost ETH and avoid DeFi contagion through bad debt. Aave immediately froze its two riskiest vaults to avoid more losses.

Aave has still frozen ETH on several networks where it has native vaults. 

The latest estimate of $196M in bad debt may diminish if the protocols are able to intercept and freeze some of the funds. Arbitrum used a forced state transition, which did not require the address owner to sign the transaction to a new wallet.

The ability to move funds from wallets raises the issue of the censorship-free nature of crypto ownership. This time, the funds were taken from the wallet of a bad actor, setting a new potential standard for reacting to hacks. 

As Web3 attacks accelerated in Q1, protocols seek ways to quickly intercept funds and not rely on ad-hoc solutions. 

Following the hack, Arbitrum lost $300M in total value locked, down to $1.7B. Aave was down to $16.52B, down from around $25B before the hack.  

Arbitrum DAO saved its own funds

Arbitrum DAO managed to save its own funds and prevent some of the bad debt on the L2 chain. Arbitrum may be affected heavily, as rsETH may not be fully backed on the L2 chain, but only on the Ethereum main net. 

Arbitrum has managed to claw back around 25% of the stolen funds. Currently, KelpDAO and other affected parties are negotiating with Layer Zero to discover the main flaw point for the hack and a way forward to recover losses. 

The recent hack was more influential due to the composability of DeFi, leaving multiple protocols exposed to rsETH and destroying multiple positions based on token collateral.

Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Comments (0)

Click the $ button, enter the symbol, and select to link a stock, ETF, or other ticker.

0/500
Commenting Guidelines
Loading...

Recommended Articles

tradingkey.logo
* References, analysis, and trading strategies are provided by the third-party provider, Trading Central, and the point of view is based on the independent assessment and judgement of the analyst, without considering the investment objectives and financial situation of the investors.
Risk Warning: Our Website and Mobile App provides only general information on certain investment products. Finsights does not provide, and the provision of such information must not be construed as Finsights providing, financial advice or recommendation for any investment product.
Investment products are subject to significant investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested and may not be suitable for everyone. Past performance of investment products is not indicative of their future performance.
Finsights may allow third party advertisers or affiliates to place or deliver advertisements on our Website or Mobile App or any part thereof and may be compensated by them based on your interaction with the advertisements.
© Copyright: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. All Rights Reserved.