Conferencia de resultados de Cohen & Steers (CNS) del 3T de 2026: 1.600 millones de dólares en entradas netas

Cohen & Steers (NYSE: CNS) presentó unos beneficios más sólidos en el tercer trimestre de 2026 y entradas netas generalizadas, aunque el aumento de los rendimientos de los bonos redujo los activos bajo gestión al cierre del trimestre. La dirección destacó la mejora del rendimiento de las inversiones, la continua adopción de ETF y una mayor cartera de mandatos institucionales.

Puntos clave

• El beneficio por acción ajustado aumentó a $0,89 desde $0,85 en el segundo trimestre. El beneficio neto se incrementó un 6% respecto al trimestre anterior y un 11% interanual hasta los 46,5 millones de dólares.
• Las entradas netas alcanzaron 1.600 millones de dólares, lo que representa más de un 6% de crecimiento orgánico anualizado, el quinto trimestre consecutivo positivo y las mayores entradas trimestrales desde el cuarto trimestre de 2021.
• Los activos bajo gestión al cierre del trimestre cayeron a 95.900 millones de dólares desde los 100.000 millones de dólares, ya que la evolución negativa del mercado compensó las entradas. Los activos bajo gestión medios aumentaron a 101.000 millones de dólares.
• El margen operativo se expandió al 37,2%, ya que el crecimiento de los ingresos superó a los gastos. Los ingresos aumentaron un 3% respecto al trimestre anterior hasta los 156 millones de dólares, mientras que los gastos operativos aumentaron un 2% hasta los 98 millones de dólares.
• La cartera de mandatos institucionales ganados y pendientes de financiación aumentó a 1.900 millones de dólares desde los 1.600 millones de dólares, su segundo nivel más alto registrado. La empresa también prevé aproximadamente 400 millones de dólares en salidas por reequilibrio parcial de cuentas institucionales.
• El rendimiento de las inversiones mejoró: el 74% de los activos bajo gestión obtuvo una rentabilidad superior durante el trimestre, mientras que el 57%, el 97% y el 98% lo hicieron en los periodos acumulados de uno, tres y cinco años, respectivamente.

Datos financieros clave

Desempeño comercial y operativo

El crecimiento fue generalizado en todas las estrategias de inversión, vehículos y canales de distribución. Todas las estrategias registraron entradas netas positivas, lideradas por el sector inmobiliario, los activos reales multiestrategia y las acciones preferentes.

El canal de gestión patrimonial aportó 1.300 millones de dólares de entradas netas, apoyado por fondos de inversión, ETF activos y SICAV. El AUM de los ETF activos aumentó un 22% durante el trimestre hasta los 1.300 millones de dólares. En agosto, Cohen & Steers lanzó su séptimo ETF activo, el Cohen & Steers Real Assets Active ETF (CSRA), que combina múltiples sectores de activos reales en una sola cartera.

El negocio de las SICAV offshore alcanzó aproximadamente 2.100 millones de dólares en AUM tras registrar sus segundos mejores flujos trimestrales, después de un segundo trimestre récord. La dirección destacó la actividad en el Reino Unido y Sudáfrica, con una mayor participación en Asia.

Las entradas netas institucionales fueron de 49 millones de dólares. Los nuevos mandatos de asesoramiento y subasesoramiento compensaron con creces una reasignación puntual de la cartera inmobiliaria por parte de un cliente japonés de subasesoramiento. Durante el trimestre, aproximadamente 700 millones de dólares de mandatos del pipeline se financiaron, mientras que más de 1.100 millones de dólares de nuevos mandatos fueron adjudicados.

El pipeline incluye activos inmobiliarios, infraestructuras cotizadas y activos reales multiestrategia, representando cada uno aproximadamente el 20%. Geográficamente, el 56% estaba en Norteamérica, el 22% en EMEA y el 16% en APAC. La dirección señaló que el período habitual desde la adjudicación de un mandato hasta su financiación es de aproximadamente cuatro meses.

Las infraestructuras cotizadas registraron su séptimo trimestre consecutivo de entradas netas. La dirección atribuyó la demanda a que los inversores combinan infraestructuras cotizadas y privadas para obtener liquidez, acceso al sector y diversificación. La empresa prevé un crecimiento del EBITDA del 9% para las infraestructuras cotizadas globales, en comparación con un promedio histórico del 6% al 7%.

Los activos reales multiestrategia generaron casi 900 millones de dólares de entradas en lo que va de año. El fondo de inversión de capital variable de esta categoría alcanzó 2.100 millones de dólares en AUM, frente a los 150 millones de dólares de 2020.

Los títulos preferentes registraron un tercer trimestre consecutivo de entradas de capital, liderados por las estrategias de baja duración. La dirección señaló que los rendimientos cercanos al 6% están respaldando la demanda por parte de asesores que buscan rentabilidad con menor sensibilidad a los tipos de interés.

Orientación de la dirección

Cohen & Steers mantuvo sus previsiones de gastos e impuestos:

• Gastos en remuneración y prestaciones de aproximadamente el 40% de los ingresos.
• Crecimiento de un dígito medio en los gastos generales y administrativos en comparación con 2025.
• Un tipo impositivo efectivo proforma del 25% al 26%.

La dirección afirmó que sigue centrada en transformar el impulso del negocio en apalancamiento operativo a lo largo del tiempo.

Riesgos y aspectos a vigilar

Los rendimientos de los bonos del Tesoro a largo plazo por encima del 5% ejercieron presión sobre los REIT, las infraestructuras cotizadas y los títulos preferentes desde sus máximos del verano. La dirección atribuyó casi la totalidad del incremento de aproximadamente 100 puntos básicos en el rendimiento del bono a 10 años durante el año a unos mayores rendimientos reales en lugar de a un aumento sustancial de las expectativas de inflación.

Cohen & Steers ha recibido la notificación de salidas por valor de aproximadamente 400 millones de dólares correspondientes al reequilibrio parcial de cuentas de dos clientes institucionales. La dirección indicó que estas decisiones no estaban relacionadas con el rendimiento de las inversiones: un cliente va a eliminar una clase de activos, mientras que otro va a cambiar su estrategia de cartera tras una adquisición.

La distribución inmobiliaria a través de las grandes firmas de intermediación financiera se mantiene limitada debido a que esta clase de activos resulta menos favorecida que las infraestructuras y el crédito privado. La dirección señaló que una adopción más amplia de CNSREIT podría requerir un mayor avance en el ciclo inmobiliario.

La exposición relacionada con la IA está presente, pero es limitada. Los centros de datos representan aproximadamente el 10% de la cartera inmobiliaria en Estados Unidos. Cerca de un tercio del negocio de infraestructuras está invertido en empresas de servicios públicos, que tienen exposición indirecta a la creciente inversión energética vinculada en parte —aunque no exclusivamente— a la demanda de IA y centros de datos.

Puntos clave de la sesión de preguntas y respuestas con analistas

Demanda inmobiliaria: La dirección señaló que la actitud de los inversores no ha cambiado sustancialmente a pesar del alza de los tipos de interés. La mejora del crecimiento de los alquileres y de los fundamentales respalda la confianza, mientras que la selección de títulos y sectores será clave, ya que los ganadores del próximo ciclo podrían ser distintos a los del ciclo anterior.

Sector inmobiliario privado: Cohen & Steers Income Opportunities REIT cuenta con aproximadamente 900 millones de dólares en activos totales y cerca de 400 millones de dólares en valor patrimonial. La dirección afirmó que su enfoque en centros comerciales al aire libre vinculados a supermercados y parques comerciales ha diferenciado su rendimiento. Se prevé que el vehículo alcance su historial de tres años en enero, lo que podría mejorar el acceso a plataformas de distribución de mayor tamaño.

Infraestructuras cotizadas frente a privadas: La dirección no considera que el creciente interés en las infraestructuras cotizadas se produzca a costa de las infraestructuras privadas. En su lugar, los gestores de activos consideran cada vez más ambas opciones de forma conjunta para mejorar la liquidez, la diversificación y la flexibilidad a lo largo de los ciclos de mercado.

Conversión institucional: El proceso de asignación institucional puede tardar unos nueve meses, mientras que la conversión de un mandato adjudicado a su financiación definitiva tarda de media unos cuatro meses. La dirección destacó que la cartera de proyectos en tramitación se mantiene diversificada entre distintas estrategias y regiones.

Transcripción completa de la llamada de resultados

Transcripción completa de la conferencia de resultados

Comentarios de la dirección

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Cohen & Steers Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded Friday, October 16, 2026.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Brian Meta, Head of Financial Planning and Analysis and Investor Relations of Cohen & Steers. Please go ahead.

Brian Meta

Thank you, and welcome to the Cohen & Steers Third Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Joining me are Joe Harvey, our Chief Executive Officer; Amit Muni, our Chief Financial Officer; and Jon Cheigh, our President and Chief Investment Officer.

Before we begin, I want to remind you that statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially because of risks and uncertainties, including those described in today's earnings release and presentation, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in our other SEC filings. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Nothing on this call constitutes an offer or solicitation with respect to any fund or other investment vehicles. We will also refer to non-GAAP financial measures, also referred to as adjusted financial measures.

Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures are included in today's earnings release and presentation to the extent reasonably available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.cohenandsteers.com. Before I turn the call over to Amit, I want to note that we've made several enhancements to how we categorize our funds this quarter and have posted our historical results in the same format to the Investor Relations section of our website.

And with that, I'll turn the call over to Amit.

Amit Muni

Thank you, Brian, and good morning, everyone. On today's call, I'll begin with a review of our operating and financial highlights for the quarter. Jon will then discuss investment performance and the market environment, followed by Joe, who will close with our strategic growth priorities and the momentum we are seeing across the business. We will then open the call for your questions. I will focus my remarks on our adjusted results.

Turning to the highlights for the quarter. We reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.89, up from $0.85 in the second quarter. We ended the quarter with assets under management of $95.9 billion, down from $100 billion last quarter as negative market movement offset the strong flows generated during the period. But nevertheless, our average AUM increased to $101 billion in the quarter. We generated $1.6 billion of net inflows, representing our fifth consecutive quarter of organic growth and our strongest flow period since the fourth quarter of 2021.

Our institutional pipeline also increased to $1.9 billion from $1.6 billion last quarter. We also continue to make advancements in our strategic growth initiatives while maintaining consistent long-term investment performance across our platform. Turning to flows on the next slide. Our organic growth momentum continued to strengthen with more than 6% annualized organic growth in the quarter. Importantly, the breadth of the growth is encouraging. Wealth continued to lead with strong flows across mutual funds, SICAVs, and ETFs, while institutional flows also turned modestly positive. At the strategy level, every investment strategy generated positive net inflows led by real estate, multi-strategy real assets and preferred securities. Taken together, these results demonstrate increasingly broad-based growth across strategies, vehicles and distribution channels.

Turning to the next slide, I'll review our financial performance. Net income was $46.5 million for the quarter, an increase of 6% from the second quarter and 11% from the third quarter of last year. Our operating margin expanded to 37.2%, reflecting the benefit of higher revenues and controlled expenses, demonstrating the operating leverage inherent in our business model. Turning to the next slide, I'll review the quarter-over-quarter changes in revenues and expenses. Revenues increased 3% to $156 million, driven by higher average AUM, reflecting the continued strength in the business despite the negative market movement experienced mostly in September.

Total operating expenses increased 2% to $98 million, primarily due to higher incentive compensation accruals associated with increased revenues and lower G&A-related costs. Looking ahead, we are maintaining our expense guidance. We continue to expect compensation and benefits expenses of approximately 40% of revenues, mid-single-digit growth in G&A expenses relative to 2025 and a pro forma effective tax rate of 25% to 26%. We remain focused on translating the momentum we are experiencing in the business into operating leverage over time.

Thank you, and I'll turn the call over to Jon.

John Cheigh

Thank you, Amit, and good morning. Today, I'd like to cover 3 topics: our performance scorecard and the improving trend, the impact of higher interest rates and the positioning of our asset classes in the current environment. Beginning with our performance scorecard, 74% of our AUM outperformed in the third quarter, up from 40% in the second quarter.

Over the last 1, 3 and 5 years, 57%, 97% and 98% of our AUM, respectively, has outperformed. Last quarter, I addressed our 1-year result as an outlier driven by U.S. REITs and noted that we expected a reversion to our historical norm of 200 basis points of alpha. While 1 quarter doesn't make a trend, we are encouraged by the early evidence. 86% of our U.S. real estate AUM outperformed this quarter, up from 15% last quarter. Global real estate saw a similar turnaround from 2% outperforming to 67%. And while it's early, fourth quarter momentum is encouraging, and we believe our REIT performance is back on trend.

Notably, our infrastructure and preferred securities teams continue to deliver with 100% and 97% of AUM, respectively, outperforming over the last year. Turning to the market. Higher interest rates have weighed on our asset classes. REITs listed infrastructure and preferred securities have declined from their summer highs. The primary driver has been the sharp rise in long-term treasury yields now above 5%. Despite all the attention being given to oil, this has not been an inflation story. It's been a real yield story. Nearly all of the roughly 100 basis point rise in the 10-year this year has come from real yields, while inflation expectations have changed very marginally.

In our view, roughly half of the most recent move in yields reflects resilient economic growth and the other half reflects higher term premium associated with fiscal issues, debt supply and global factors. That distinction matters. Stronger growth supports the higher earnings of the companies we invest in, while higher term premium affects the valuation of essentially all asset classes, not just ours. So while higher rates have created near-term pressure, we don't believe they have changed the relative attractiveness of our asset classes. It's also important to put the current rate environment in historical perspective. Higher rates do not mean poor returns for real assets.

For example, REITs have generated positive returns in 4 of the last 5 Fed hiking cycles. The 2022, '23 hiking cycle was clearly different with REITs returning negative 11% annualized. But in the 2004 and 2016 hiking cycles, annualized returns were a positive 24% and 8%, respectively. The lesson is that the level of interest rates alone does not determine returns. What matters is the pace of change relative to market expectations, along with the underlying fundamental trajectory and valuations. And that leads to what I think is the most important point about today's environment. Unlike 2022, '23, we are entering this period with improving fundamentals. In listed real estate, we see an early to mid-cycle recovery.

Reduced new supply and growing demand should support growth above historical norms. And this isn't just a real estate story. Real assets broadly are benefiting from significant secular investment needs, which are driving earnings growth. We expect 9% EBITDA growth for global listed infrastructure versus a historical average of 6% to 7% and 20% earnings growth for natural resource equities versus a historical average of 6% to 8%. Rates matter, but valuations and fundamentals matter more.

And today, we believe both are increasingly supportive of our asset classes. So how should investors think about this environment and positioning their portfolios? We believe the investment regime has changed from the one that prevailed for much of the past 15 years. Investors we speak with are increasingly seeking diversifiers. Investors now have attractive opportunities in fixed income, but they also face greater inflation risk, greater equity market concentration and an acute need for diversification. That, in turn, makes the case for a barbelled approach.

On the one side, preferred securities can provide attractive income and real returns. On the other side, real estate, infrastructure and natural resource equities can provide growth, diversification and inflation protection. So we see distinct opportunities across our strategies. For investors seeking income, preferred securities, for investors looking to participate in the real estate recovery, our REIT strategies offer accelerating fundamentals. For investors seeking secular growth and diversification, listed infrastructure and natural resource companies are benefiting from powerful global tailwinds such as commodity undersupply, reindustrialization and AI infrastructure.

For investors seeking a broad real asset solution, our multi-strategy real assets portfolio brings these exposures together in a diversified allocation. We believe our asset classes offer compelling solutions for delivering income, inflation protection, diversification and liquidity, all while allowing investors to reduce exposure to the more concentrated and more expensively valued segments of the market.

With that, let me turn the call over to Joe.

Joseph Harvey

Thank you, Jon, and good morning. Today, I'll review key business trends, reports on our growth initiatives and discuss broadening interest in our listed infrastructure and multi-strategy real assets strategies.

Our third quarter results provide further evidence that our growth strategy continues to gain traction. Key indicators include strong 3- and 5-year investment performance, robust net inflows and a sizable won and unfunded pipeline. We generated $1.6 billion of net inflows, marking our fifth consecutive positive quarter and our strongest net flow quarter since the fourth quarter of 2021. Growth was broad-based across strategies, vehicles and distribution channels, and our institutional pipeline strengthened to $1.9 billion as it continued to replenish. We experienced modest quarterly asset depreciation, driven primarily by market-wide reaction to rising bond yields.

Overall, our results demonstrate the strength and diversity of our business. Our wealth channel continues to drive organic growth with $1.3 billion of net inflows this quarter. Growth was balanced across mutual funds, active ETFs and SICAVs, demonstrating alignment between our vehicle lineups and client investment models. Along those lines, we launched our seventh active ETF in August, the Cohen & Steers Real Assets Active ETF, symbol CSRA. This ETF is an actively managed multi-strategy real assets portfolio, which we believe offers inflation sensitivity, long-term total returns and diversification across real asset sectors within a single allocation. We believe this is an attractive strategy for investors who want a turnkey allocation to real assets.

In addition, we see compelling use cases in both the retirement and health care markets. Adoption of our active ETFs is accelerating with growth of 22% during the quarter to $1.3 billion. Industry-wide, U.S. ETFs, both active and passive, have taken in a record $1.5 trillion so far this year, which beats the full year record set in 2025. ETFs are becoming the preferred vehicle for advisers and individuals, and we believe our active ETF strategies offer compelling solutions with tax efficiency, attractive expense ratios, intraday trading and transparency and a track record of alpha generation that passive cannot offer.

We continue to review options for the next phase of our ETF strategy, which may include more core strategy launches, ETFs as a share class for existing funds and potential international vehicles. Preferred securities are an example of strategy diversification compared with real assets in our business. This strategy had its third consecutive quarter of net inflows with low-duration preferreds being the standout. This is a compelling environment for this strategy as advisers look for income without taking on meaningful rate risk.

And with yields near 6%, we believe it's one of the best risk-adjusted income opportunities in fixed income today, especially as advisers are looking for alternatives to fixed income that has underperformed, such as municipal bonds. Institutional flows were modestly positive with $49 million in the quarter. This includes strong net inflows from new advisory and sub-advisory mandates, which more than offset a onetime portfolio reallocation by a Japanese sub-advisory client in real estate. We are seeing continued progress with our institutional tactical real estate LP fund as it continues to contribute to our won and unfunded pipeline. We are also seeing success in our sub-advisory ex Japan business with the funding of several new mandates driven primarily by takeaways from peers.

In Global sub-advisory, we intend to build on our recent momentum in the U.S., Canada, New Zealand and Australia. We're focusing as well on opportunities in other countries and look forward to reporting on those initiatives in the future. Looking ahead, we have been notified of approximately $400 million in partial account rebalancing outflows from 2 institutional clients, which are not related to investment performance. One client is eliminating an asset class and the other is being acquired and changing portfolio strategy for a portion of its accounts. While institutional flows can be uneven from quarter-to-quarter, the sustaining replenishment of our pipeline gives us confidence in the direction of the business.

Our won and unfunded pipeline grew to $1.9 billion in the third quarter, the second-largest ever. The velocity of the pipeline continues with $700 million of fundings reloaded with over $1.1 billion of new mandates awarded within the quarter. Similar to our flows, we continue to see diversification in our pipeline with 20% in each of real estate, listed infrastructure, multi-strategy real assets as well as diversification by region with 56% in North America, 22% in EMEA and 16% in APAC. We continue to invest in distribution.

One example is our SICAVs business, where we are seeing strong results and want to invest more as wealth markets develop in countries such as South Africa and regions like Asia. We are pleased to welcome Erik Schneberger to Cohen & Steers as our new Chief Marketing Officer. Erik has many years of experience leading and building award-winning marketing teams. We look forward to Erik elevating our global marketing efforts and expanding our brand and media strategies, digital innovation and client engagement.

Finally, I want to shine a spotlight on 2 strategies where allocator demand is broadening. Listed infrastructure is increasingly becoming recognized as a dedicated strategic allocation in portfolios. While early allocators favored private infrastructure, they are realizing the benefits of allocating to both listed and private together, especially as liquidity has become a growing need in institutional portfolios. While replacing and expanding aging infrastructure has been an investment theme for some time, capital investment has reemerged at the forefront of the growth of AI, reindustrialization and supply chain trends, giving the asset class renewed and widespread appeal.

These trends have contributed to our seventh straight quarter of net inflows in the strategy. As allocators look at their real assets allocations holistically, infrastructure has been gaining portfolio share. We have been a direct beneficiary and right now, picking any time period, 1, 3, 5, 10 years and since inception going back to 2004, our performance has never looked better. We are seeing interest in newer markets such as Europe and South Africa with growing interest in Asia, including South Korea. We believe our 22 years of consistently generating alpha with our team of dedicated specialists makes us a natural partner.

Investors are likewise turning to our multi-strategy real asset solutions with almost $900 million of year-to-date inflows. Our multi-strategy portfolios are a compelling solution to diversification, offering equity-like return potential with less of the volatility of any single asset class plus meaningful inflation protection. And the sustained inflationary environment is motivating investors to make this allocation more strategic. Furthermore, we believe we have moved into an era of scarcity and that we're still early in the large build-out of supply chains and physical assets.

To illustrate the characteristics of the real asset blend, an index would have delivered annualized returns of 11% during periods of inflation since 1998 compared with 3.1% for global equities and 2.7% for TIPS. With the S&P more concentrated at 40% in its top 10 stocks than any other point in modern history, investors are seeking solutions that have a low correlation to global equities. This is why I believe that all 401(k) plans should have a multi-strategy real assets fund for participants. Our open-end mutual fund has reached $2.1 billion in AUM, up from $150 million in 2020.

Taken together, these trends support our view that real assets are becoming a core allocation in portfolios, and we are well positioned to capture that demand. To summarize, we believe our third quarter results demonstrate that our business strategy is working. Organic growth in our strategies has returned. Our investment teams are strong. Our range of vehicles is opening new avenues for growth, and our investments in distribution are extending our reach with clients around the world. We believe Cohen & Steers is well positioned to build on this momentum and deliver sustainable long-term growth.

Thank you, and we will now take your questions. Julianne, can you please open up the lines for questions?

Operator

[Operator Instructions]

And our first question comes from John Dunn from Evercore ISI.

Preguntas y respuestas

John Dunn

You framed the broader picture in the prepared remarks, but maybe to drill down a little more with rates likely moving higher, what gives you confidence demand for real estate can sustain? And maybe give a flavor of the conversations you're having with FAs and then in the wealth channel and with institutional investors and consultants. Any differences between like the 2 sides?

Joseph Harvey

I'll ask Jon Cheigh to take the question on real estate, and I'll respond to the question on wealth versus institutional markets.

John Cheigh

John, thanks for your question. I would say that we haven't really seen any kind of notable change in tone in how the investors we're talking to are looking at the real estate opportunity. I think for most investors, real estate has been in the so-called dog house, if you will, over the course of '22, '23, '24.

So the idea that there's very good value here is very appreciated. The question has just been about the timing of the recovery and what that recovery looks like. And as I said, we are seeing improving rental growth and so that improvement in fundamentals is giving more investors greater confidence. So that's why we're seeing the pipeline continuing to grow. That being said, the winners and losers within real estate and by that, I mean the kinds of sectors that have been winners or losers, they're going to be different. And so it's not just about the beta or exposure to real estate.

We've talked for the last couple of calls about how strong, for example, our nontraded REIT performance has been since inception and since this year. And that's because it's positioned very differently, frankly, than its peers that have been out in the market. And so again, we think that's going to create an opportunity that as investor interest in real estate continues to grow, there will also be a greater realization that it's not just getting the beta, it's about picking the new winners for this new cycle.

Joseph Harvey

Then, Jon, just to talk a little bit about institutional and wealth. On the institutional side, the process is one where allocations are deliberated over and made over, say, a 9-month time period. So you can't really look at the on-the-run data points to really see what that market is doing. But as we've been talking about in these calls, our won and unfunded pipeline has now been very strong for about 5 quarters. And as I mentioned, we hit a second best all-time number this quarter.

Importantly, it's broader than it has been historically across our investment strategies. And in terms of the pace of prospect and client activity that we're conducting, it's nothing has really changed as it relates to the changes in the macro over the past couple of months. And so when we look at the searches that we're in and the so-called backlog pipeline, we feel good about the increased interest in our strategies. As it relates to the wealth channel, of course, with our vehicles, our open-end daily vehicles, we can get more real-time views on investor sentiment. And I think that the historical view of retail is very coincident with the market. But we're increasingly spending our time with advisers who are more sophisticated allocators. They follow more like an endowment model.

So I would expect to see less of the coincident type flow activity and get a real good read on how investors are thinking. If you look at our average daily flows over the period for this quarter, July, August, September, our average daily flows increased in each of those months. So as far as we can see today, no real impact on flow activity from the changes in the macro environment recently.

John Dunn

Got it. And then thinking about some of the newer growth areas, could you give a little more detail on the SICAVs lineup, like where the demand preferences are? You mentioned a couple of regions, but were there any others to highlight stuff like relative fee rates and any differences you're experiencing versus what you have seen for a long time in the U.S. wealth channel?

Joseph Harvey

Well, our offshore mutual funds, the SICAVs, we've had a really strong quarter in flows. It was our second best quarter, and that followed our best quarter in the second quarter. So I'm very excited about this business. We're at about $2.1 billion in overall AUM. So it's not huge, but I think it has a very strong potential. And we're seeing good activity in the U.K.

As I've mentioned a couple of times, we're seeing good activity in South Africa, and we're seeing increasing activity in Asia. So one of the things that we're seeing in a couple of these markets is the development of the wealth business, the advisory business. And South Africa is a good example of that. So as we interact with these advisers, you can just kind of tell that their businesses are developing and they're being educated on more asset classes globally. So it's a great opportunity for us to educate on real assets. in a country like South Africa, they have appreciation for things like natural resources.

So we're having some success there. Asia is the most rapidly growing wealth market in the world. It's much bigger and a little more complicated, but we're seeing some similar activity as it relates to the early development of the wealth market. So taking a step back, based on this success, we're going to invest more in this area by virtue of our sales professionals and data to know where to go. And so it's a very exciting part of our business.

Operator

Our next question comes from Craig Siegenthaler from Bank of America.

Ivory Gao

This is Ivory Gao on for Craig. On infrastructure, it had another quarter of strong inflows, and you stated that listed infra is becoming a dedicated strategic allocation. Are you seeing allocators move from private infra to listed because of liquidity or slow distributions? And are you considering a semi-liquid infra product for the wealth channel as you kind of did with C&S REIT?

Joseph Harvey

So I would say that the growing interest in listed infrastructure is not coming at the expense of private infrastructure. Private infrastructure has been one of the largest growth areas in the institutional allocation. So we -- it does look like the allocations to private infrastructure are -- the rates of acceleration are leveling off. But I think it's just a natural evolution, just as we've seen in real estate where investors recognize that you put the 2 together, listed and private, and you can end up with better results.

And that comes from many dimensions, whether it's the sectors you can get allocated to, the management teams that you can get in each sector and the fact that the return cycles are out of phase so that allocators who have the capability to move between the listed and private markets can generate alpha from those things. So I think that infrastructure is still in a bull market, and it's going to continue to be based on the things that Jon and I talked about with respect to the capital investment cycle pertaining to AI and power and such.

As it relates to the wealth market, it's been a bull market in the vehicles for private infrastructure. We have something that's in the lab, but we're not ready to talk about it. But as it relates to private strategies in the wealth channel, we're very focused on our nontraded REIT CNSREIT.

Ivory Gao

Got it. And just as a follow-up, you said data centers are one of the booming parts of real estate and your deck now puts listed infra at the forefront of AI growth. How much of the recent performance and pipeline in your REIT and infra strategies depends kind of specifically on the AI and data center demand? And if AI CapEx were to slow, how exposed would the flows be across the 2?

John Cheigh

Yes, sure. I'll take that. So within our U.S. real estate strategy, just roughly speaking, data centers are about 10% of our portfolio. They've been beneficiaries of, obviously, the significant demand for data centers. But most of that has come from existing assets as opposed to new development. So is there some exposure?

I would say, yes, certainly, at the margin, there's some exposure. But this roughly 10% of the portfolio is not very frontier or development oriented. On the infrastructure side, there's less direct exposure, but there is indirect exposure in the sense that, let's just say, roughly 1/3 of our infrastructure business is in the utility space, where historically, earnings for utilities have been, call it, 4% or so. And there's been a step-up in that growth rate more in the 7% to 8% range. A part of that is because of the need for investment for power generation, of which, of course, AI and data centers are a big, but definitely not the only part of that.

So look, there is some exposure there, but it's not direct. And as we look out over the next 3, 4, 5 years or so, in both cases, we'd say data centers and power -- this is a so-called infrastructure layer, if you will. We don't believe there's excess capacity of compute. And so to the extent certain stocks sell off because of a concern about the future trajectory of growth slowing. I mean that's not really going to have an impact on this infrastructure layer. It might change the long-term growth, but it's certainly not having any kind of a short-term direct impact.

So if anything, we think real estate and infrastructure are a really good risk/reward way to play AI and the need for compute. Obviously, there's other ways to invest in those themes that can be much higher reward. But as we've seen over the last few days, also much higher risk because of the operating leverage or financial leverage embedded in some of those other non-infrastructure, non-real estate business models.

Operator

Our next question comes from John Dunn from Evercore ISI.

John Dunn

On private real estate, it seems to be gaining some traction lately. When do you think we could see an acceleration in organic growth there? And then is the theme that there are advantages to being a newer platform? And does that resonate with investors like when you're competing against the legacy brands in that space?

Joseph Harvey

John, I missed the very beginning of your question, but I think I know what it is. So let me start and then you can follow up. But as it relates to CNSREIT, our nontraded real estate vehicle, we continue to have among the best performance in the peer group. Since our inception, it's the #1 performing nontraded REIT.

And that's based on our investment team nailing it as it relates to an investment thesis around open-air shopping centers, grocery-anchored shopping centers and power centers. And so we've continued to work toward getting critical mass. Our portfolio is about $900 million in total assets with equity value of about $400 million. So we're getting to the point size-wise and track record-wise, i.e., we're going to hit our 3-year track record in January, where it's now more viable to get platformed at larger distributors. We've been very focused on working with endowment type RIA firms, and that's where the majority of our capital has been raised.

In terms of the onboarding process at the wirehouses, real estate is still a less favored strategy compared with infrastructure and private credit. So we're going to have to get further into the cycle to see a broader take-up from the largest distributors. That said, in the RIA channel, these allocators get the investment thesis. They've enjoyed the returns that we have delivered. And as our team starts to think about what is next on the investing front, we think we're going to be able to sustain the type of relative performance that we have delivered in Cohen & Steers Income Opportunities REIT. So we're very excited about the whole initiative. The investment landscape is going to get even better for us. And we've been talking about in these calls and other places.

I think about your second question, which is a lot of capital has gone into certain segments of the real estate industry, namely apartments and industrial. And the current rate environment is going to pressure the return cycle of those strategies. So we aren't affected by that because we haven't been allocating to them. However, in 2 years' time, it may present a great investment opportunity for our private team. So we're excited about where we're at in the real estate cycle and what the rate environment is doing to private markets that maybe got a little excessive and are going through their down cycle. But that's the Cohen & Steers brand. We're about innovating and innovating around performance. So we're ready.

John Dunn

Got it. And then if I could sneak one on the pipeline. You talked about 9 months to kind of win the mandate. What about the timing of converting the pipeline? And you mentioned it's broadening. Maybe just a flavor of the composition of what's in it.

Joseph Harvey

Well, the life cycle in terms of getting to -- from the pipeline to fund is roughly about 4 months. In terms of getting to the point, that it can be very short or it can be very long in terms of years. So the composition of it, just like last quarter, is very diverse. And so that's very exciting. It's across real estate, both U.S. real estate and global real estate. And that is something that's changed a little bit.

There was a period of time amidst peak U.S. exceptionalism where global allocations weren't very prevalent. We've seen more global allocations in real estate. So it's real estate, it's infrastructure, it's multi-strategy real assets. And I'd say that has gone up in the pipeline and flows. And again, it's -- if 3 years ago, people were saying, yes, I see inflation has ticked up, but I think that's transitory. It's going to come back down. And they didn't think about real assets as a strategic allocation. I think by now, inflation is so embedded in our economy and the psyche. So inflation-sensitive allocations have to become strategic in investor portfolios. So -- and then, of course, other real estate strategies, our institutional listed private vehicle that I referenced, the tactical real estate fund is a part of the pipeline.

We're seeing a lot of interest in that strategy from institutions who own the core property funds, the so-called ODCE Funds. And the tactical real estate fund is a solution for them to get a better allocation in terms of having a better core real estate allocation by virtue of returns and diversity and liquidity. So the composition of the pipeline looks very good.

Operator

We have no further questions. I would like to turn the call back to Joe Harvey for closing remarks.

Joseph Harvey

Well, thank you, Julianne. As I said, it was a good quarter, and we'll look forward to reporting to you on the fourth quarter and at the beginning of the new year. So thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.