tradingkey.logo
tradingkey.logo
Search

CFTC sues Utah to shield prediction markets from state gambling laws

CryptopolitanOct 27, 2026 10:10 PM
facebooktwitterlinkedin
View all comments(0)

On October 27, 2026, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a lawsuit against the state of Utah to prevent it from enforcing its gambling laws on prediction markets operating under federal jurisdiction.

For prediction exchange operators, such as Kalshi, the issue is larger than Utah’s gambling laws. The question is whether these prediction markets can work within the framework of a single set of federal regulations or whether they have to abide by specific gambling laws of every state.

Two lawsuits pointing in opposite directions

On October 20, 2026, Utah Attorney General Derek Brown filed a lawsuit against five entities owned by Kalshi and Susquehanna for the alleged facilitation of illegal gambling. The state sought an injunction and restoration of losses and various fees estimated to be between $30.6 million and $61.2 million. According to Cryptopolitan, naming Susquehanna broadens the legal battle to the market makers, who are the providers of liquidity and trades.

Kalshi claims that its contracts are derivatives that are regulated under federal jurisdiction. But Utah states that the Commodity Exchange Act still allows room for state gambling laws. The new case being brought by the CFTC puts that disagreement in a federal-state showdown.

An August ruling and 44 states push back

The federal argument has faced challenges in the courtroom. On August 4, a federal judge in Utah ruled that the Act does not prevent states from enforcing its laws. Appellate courts have different decisions. The Third Circuit supported Kalshi in New Jersey. The Ninth Circuit supported Nevada, and the Sixth Circuit sided with Ohio and Tennessee.

Opposition has not just been confined to the courts. In July, 44 state attorneys general contested the authority of the CFTC over contracts related to sports. On October 9, 2026, the agency suggested classifying some event contracts as swaps. This rule is not final yet.

Furthermore, the CFTC is suing states directly. Utah is the tenth state that it has filed suit against after states Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Rhode Island, New Mexico, and Kentucky.

CFTC vs. US States: Prediction Market Regulation Battle and $419.1B Trading Volume

What a $419.1 billion business stands to lose

The legal dispute can have significant financial consequences. Artemis reports that the prediction market registered trading volume of $419.1 billion for the year up to October 27, 2026. Sports contracts took the top share at $173.6 billion (41.4%), followed by exotics at $149.3 billion and crypto at $60.3 billion.

Kalshi has plenty riding on sports contracts. Reuters reported the company’s valuation at roughly $40 billion, while CEO Tarek Mansour said sports still account for nearly 65% of its revenue, down from around 95% nine months earlier.

A patchwork of state rules could make these contracts more expensive to offer or restrict access in certain markets. Legal pressure on liquidity providers could also widen trading spreads and reduce market activity. So far, however, there is no evidence that Susquehanna has withdrawn from Kalshi.

Europe restricts, Asia hesitates

The US is not alone in trying to draw the line between financial trading and gambling. In July, ESMA warned that event contracts classified as derivatives fall under existing retail binary-option bans. Firms distributing these products also need authorization as investment firms, while national gambling laws may still apply.

Asia faces a similar challenge. Tiger Research warns that restrictive regulations could drive trading activity offshore and leave users without adequate protection, even as major technology companies show growing interest in prediction markets.

Mansour told Reuters the dispute could reach the Supreme Court and expressed confidence in Kalshi’s position. But New Jersey—not Kalshi—petitioned the justices after losing in the Third Circuit. The Court has not agreed to hear the case.

For now, watch Utah’s federal lawsuit, Kalshi’s appeal, and the CFTC’s pending swaps proposal.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice.

Comments (0)

Click the $ button, enter the symbol, and select to link a stock, ETF, or other ticker.

0/500
Commenting Guidelines
Loading...

Recommended Articles

tradingkey.logo
Risk Warning: Our Website and Mobile App provides only general information on certain investment products. Finsights does not provide, and the provision of such information must not be construed as Finsights providing, financial advice or recommendation for any investment product.
Investment products are subject to significant investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested and may not be suitable for everyone. Past performance of investment products is not indicative of their future performance.
Finsights may allow third party advertisers or affiliates to place or deliver advertisements on our Website or Mobile App or any part thereof and may be compensated by them based on your interaction with the advertisements.
© Copyright: FINSIGHTS MEDIA PTE. LTD. All Rights Reserved.